Detailed description of clinical examination of higher mental functions like conscoiusness, cognition, memory, pereception,etc. in neurological conditions.
The following slideshow contains the overview of blood supply of the brain viz. arterial and venous; Blood brain Barrier, Cavernous Sinus. It also has the various Neuropsychiatric manifestations related to alteration in the blood supply of brain.
Detailed description of clinical examination of higher mental functions like conscoiusness, cognition, memory, pereception,etc. in neurological conditions.
The following slideshow contains the overview of blood supply of the brain viz. arterial and venous; Blood brain Barrier, Cavernous Sinus. It also has the various Neuropsychiatric manifestations related to alteration in the blood supply of brain.
این ارائه در کارگاه تخصصی تقلید و آپراکسی سرنخ هایی برای مداخلات مبتنی بر شواهد توسط دکتر هاشم فرهنگ دوست تدریس شده است.
برای مطالعه مطالب بیشتر در این زمینه به وب سایت فروردین مراجعه کنید.
www.farvardin-group.com
Knee anatomy and clinical tests 2024.pdfvimalpl1234
This includes all relevant anatomy and clinical tests compiled from standard textbooks, Campbell,netter etc..It is comprehensive and best suited for orthopaedicians and orthopaedic residents.
These simplified slides by Dr. Sidra Arshad present an overview of the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract.
Learning objectives:
1. Enlist the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract
2. Briefly explain how these functions are carried out
3. Discuss the significance of dead space
4. Differentiate between minute ventilation and alveolar ventilation
5. Describe the cough and sneeze reflexes
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 39, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 34, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
3. Chapter 17, Human Physiology by Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
4. Non-respiratory functions of the lungs https://academic.oup.com/bjaed/article/13/3/98/278874
Explore natural remedies for syphilis treatment in Singapore. Discover alternative therapies, herbal remedies, and lifestyle changes that may complement conventional treatments. Learn about holistic approaches to managing syphilis symptoms and supporting overall health.
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...i3 Health
i3 Health is pleased to make the speaker slides from this activity available for use as a non-accredited self-study or teaching resource.
This slide deck presented by Dr. Kami Maddocks, Professor-Clinical in the Division of Hematology and
Associate Division Director for Ambulatory Operations
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, will provide insight into new directions in targeted therapeutic approaches for older adults with mantle cell lymphoma.
STATEMENT OF NEED
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for 5% to 7% of all lymphomas. Its prognosis ranges from indolent disease that does not require treatment for years to very aggressive disease, which is associated with poor survival (Silkenstedt et al, 2021). Typically, MCL is diagnosed at advanced stage and in older patients who cannot tolerate intensive therapy (NCCN, 2022). Although recent advances have slightly increased remission rates, recurrence and relapse remain very common, leading to a median overall survival between 3 and 6 years (LLS, 2021). Though there are several effective options, progress is still needed towards establishing an accepted frontline approach for MCL (Castellino et al, 2022). Treatment selection and management of MCL are complicated by the heterogeneity of prognosis, advanced age and comorbidities of patients, and lack of an established standard approach for treatment, making it vital that clinicians be familiar with the latest research and advances in this area. In this activity chaired by Michael Wang, MD, Professor in the Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma at MD Anderson Cancer Center, expert faculty will discuss prognostic factors informing treatment, the promising results of recent trials in new therapeutic approaches, and the implications of treatment resistance in therapeutic selection for MCL.
Target Audience
Hematology/oncology fellows, attending faculty, and other health care professionals involved in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Learning Objectives
1.) Identify clinical and biological prognostic factors that can guide treatment decision making for older adults with MCL
2.) Evaluate emerging data on targeted therapeutic approaches for treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory MCL and their applicability to older adults
3.) Assess mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies for MCL and their implications for treatment selection
Report Back from SGO 2024: What’s the Latest in Cervical Cancer?bkling
Are you curious about what’s new in cervical cancer research or unsure what the findings mean? Join Dr. Emily Ko, a gynecologic oncologist at Penn Medicine, to learn about the latest updates from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2024 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Dr. Ko will discuss what the research presented at the conference means for you and answer your questions about the new developments.
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journeygreendigital
Tom Selleck, an enduring figure in Hollywood. has captivated audiences for decades with his rugged charm, iconic moustache. and memorable roles in television and film. From his breakout role as Thomas Magnum in Magnum P.I. to his current portrayal of Frank Reagan in Blue Bloods. Selleck's career has spanned over 50 years. But beyond his professional achievements. fans have often been curious about Tom Selleck Health. especially as he has aged in the public eye.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Many have been interested in Tom Selleck health. not only because of his enduring presence on screen but also because of the challenges. and lifestyle choices he has faced and made over the years. This article delves into the various aspects of Tom Selleck health. exploring his fitness regimen, diet, mental health. and the challenges he has encountered as he ages. We'll look at how he maintains his well-being. the health issues he has faced, and his approach to ageing .
Early Life and Career
Childhood and Athletic Beginnings
Tom Selleck was born on January 29, 1945, in Detroit, Michigan, and grew up in Sherman Oaks, California. From an early age, he was involved in sports, particularly basketball. which played a significant role in his physical development. His athletic pursuits continued into college. where he attended the University of Southern California (USC) on a basketball scholarship. This early involvement in sports laid a strong foundation for his physical health and disciplined lifestyle.
Transition to Acting
Selleck's transition from an athlete to an actor came with its physical demands. His first significant role in "Magnum P.I." required him to perform various stunts and maintain a fit appearance. This role, which he played from 1980 to 1988. necessitated a rigorous fitness routine to meet the show's demands. setting the stage for his long-term commitment to health and wellness.
Fitness Regimen
Workout Routine
Tom Selleck health and fitness regimen has evolved. adapting to his changing roles and age. During his "Magnum, P.I." days. Selleck's workouts were intense and focused on building and maintaining muscle mass. His routine included weightlifting, cardiovascular exercises. and specific training for the stunts he performed on the show.
Selleck adjusted his fitness routine as he aged to suit his body's needs. Today, his workouts focus on maintaining flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular health. He incorporates low-impact exercises such as swimming, walking, and light weightlifting. This balanced approach helps him stay fit without putting undue strain on his joints and muscles.
Importance of Flexibility and Mobility
In recent years, Selleck has emphasized the importance of flexibility and mobility in his fitness regimen. Understanding the natural decline in muscle mass and joint flexibility with age. he includes stretching and yoga in his routine. These practices help prevent injuries, improve posture, and maintain mobilit
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Oleg Kshivets
RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2252.1±1742.5 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 73.2%, 10 years – 64.8%, 20 years – 42.5%. 513 LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3124.6±1525.6 days), 148 LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5054.4±1504.1 days).199 LCP died because of LC (LS=562.7±374.5 days). 5YS of LCP after bi/lobectomies was significantly superior in comparison with LCP after pneumonectomies (78.1% vs.63.7%, P=0.00001 by log-rank test). AT significantly improved 5YS (66.3% vs. 34.8%) (P=0.00000 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time (P=0.000-0.038). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12 (rank=2), thrombocytes/CC (3), erythrocytes/CC (4), eosinophils/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10); leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0).
CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) LC cell dynamics; 10) surgery type: lobectomy/pneumonectomy; 11) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracic surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis.
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...kevinkariuki227
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
4. READING AND WRITING : ALEXIA and
AGRAPHIA
• VWFA-visual word form area
• Equivalent to Auditory phoneme perception
area.
• Left occipito-temporal sulcus & left fusiform
gyrus.
6. Reading with comprehension
• Visual information from the
left occipital lobe reaches
directly the left fusiform
gyrus.
• From the rt occipital lobe
has to cross over to (corpus
callosum)reach the left
fusiform GYRUS.
• ANGULAR GYRUS-
interpretation of visual-
verbal materials.
9. Reading
CONDITIONS FEATURES
BROCA’S APHASIA OFTEN IMPAIRED(THIRD ALEXIA)
WERNICKE’S APAHSIA IMPAIRED FOR COMPREHENSION,
READING ALOUD
GLOBAL IMPAIRED
CONDUCTION APHASIA INABILITY TO READ ALOUD, SOME
COMPREHENSION
TRANSCORTICAL MOTOR INTACT
TRANSCORTICAL SENSORY IMPAIRED
TRANSCORTICAL MIXED IMPAIRED
ANOMIC APHASIA INTACT
10. ALEXIA WITHOUT AGRAPHIA
• PURE/POSTERIOR ALEXIA
• CAN NOT : read and
understand
• CAN UNDERSTAND: words
spelled aloud, written on the
palm
• Visual function intact(Naming
objects)
• left occipital lobe with
splenium
• Left PCA infarcts
ALEXIA WITH AGRAPHIA
• CENTRAL ALEXIA
• Aquired illiteracy
• Unable to read or write
• Dominant ANGULAR gyrus
15. THIRD ALEXIA
• Inability to comprehend syntax
• “Ravana was killed by rama” vs “ Rama killed
Ravana”
• Seen in Broca’s aphasia
16. OTHER ALEXIAS
SURFACE ALEXIA
• Grapheme to phoneme
conversion problem
• Irregular orthography
• CAN read: mint,dog,cat
• CAN NOT read: pint, dough,
laugh
•
PARALEXIA(DEEP)
• Problem of READIN ALOUD
• SEMANTIC paralexia –m.c
• Eg: infant read as baby
17. WRITING
CONDITIONS FEATURES
BROca’s APAHSIA IMPAIRED(DYSMORPHIC, AGRAMMATICAL)
WERNICKE’S APHASIA WELL FORMED PARAGRAPHIC
GLOBAL APHASIA IMPAIRED
CONDUCTION APHASIA VARIABLE
TRANSCORTICAL MOTOR APHASIA INTACT
TRANSCORTICAL SENSORY APHASIA IMPAIRED
TRANSCORTICAL MIXED APHASIA IMPAIRED
ANOMIC APHASIA INTACT (EXCEPT FOR ANOMIA)
24. CONCEPTUAL AND IDEATIONAL
APRAXIA(Ochipa’s model)
• PRAXIS conceptual system has 3 types of
knowledge
Knowledge of objects and tools
Knowledge of actions
Knowledge of organization of actions in a
sequence
• 1st two impaired in conceptual A.
• 3rd knowledge in ideational A.
25. Transitive movements
• Movements or pantomimes where an object is
used
1. Act of omission(forgets to spread the Paste)
2. Act of misuse(uses key instead of hammer)
3. Act of mislocation(holds the pen upside down)
26. IDEOMOTOR
• ABNORMALITIES of the action production
system
• Perform poorly on pantomime
• Significant improvement with object.
27. LIMB KINETIC APRAXIA
• PREMOTOR CORTEX
• Deficit confined to finger and hand
movements c/l to the lesion regardless of the
hemispheric side, with preservation of power
28. OTHER APRAXIA’S
• Eg .how to drink using a straw, whistle , cough
• Ventral pemotor cortex
BUCCO-FACIAL
APRAXIA
• Genu and body
• Unilateral apraxia of the non dominant limb
CALLOSAL
APRAXIA
• Inability to generate voluntary saccades to a
visual target
OCULOMOTOR
APRAXIA
• High level gait disorder
• NPHGAIT APRAXIA
37. IDEOMOTOR APRAXIA
• PANTOMIME using a hammer or a
screw driverTRANSITIVE
• Wave good bye, salute
INTRANSITIVE
MOVEMENTS
• Imitation of meaningful and
meaningless posturesIMITATION
ACTUAL TOOL
USE
43. LIMBKINETICAPRAXIA Ask the patient to oppose their
thumb to their index , middle , ring
and little fingers in rapid succession
Ask the patient to imitate some
random hand position
47. ACALCULIA• PRIMARY acalculia
• A basic defect in computational ability
• Left angular gyrus
ANARITHMIA
• SECONADRY ACALCULIA
• Alexia for numbers
• Also in central alexia & alexia without agraphia
ALEXIC
ACALCULIA
• Difficulty in Written arithmetics
• Carrying over problem
• Mental arithmetics better than written calculation
• Rt . PARIETAL pathology
SPATIAL
ACALCULIA
48. Testing procedure
1. FORWARD and backward counting
2. Symbolic transcoding
1. Numerical to verbal: 109---- one hundred nine
2. Verbal to numerical: vice versa
3. Reading and writing arithmetic signs
4. Mental calculation(add,subsract,multiply,divide)
5. Written calculation
6. Aligning numbers in columns for adding.(eg.
32+333+3456+2)
7. Arithmetic problems requiring planning. (perform the
ebove calculation)
49.
50. FINGER AGNOSIA
• Inability to recognise , distinguish or name
fingers
1. patients own hand
2. examiners hand
3. Drawing of a hand.
• m.C problems index, middle and ring fingers
51. Testing procedure
1. Hands visible: identification of fingers touched by the
examiner
2. Hands visible: identification of examiners fingers
3. Hands hidden: identification of fingers touched by the
examiner
4. Hands hidden: identification of pairs fingers
simultaneously touched by the examiners.
52. RIGHT LEFT DISORIENTATION
• Inability to identify right & left sides of
1. Own body
2. Person seated opposite
3. Photograph/drawing
• Patients also have problems with
1. Up & down
2. Above & below
3. Over & under
53. Testing procedure
ORIENTATION TOWARDS OWN BODY
1. Naming single lateral body parts touched
2. Pointing to single lateral body parts on verbal
command
3. Executing double uncrossed movements on
command(touch left ear with left hand)
4. Executing double crossed movements on verbal
command(touching left ear with right hand)
54. ORIENTATION TOWARDS CONFRONTING
EXAMINER OR PICTURE
1. Naming single lateral body parts shown by the
examiner
2. Pointing to single lateral body parts on verbal
command
3. Imitating double uncrossed movements on
command(touch left ear with left hand)
4. Imitating double crossed movements on verbal
command(touching left ear with right hand)
55. COMBINED ORIENTATION TOWARDS ONE’S
OWN BODY AND CONFRONTING PERSON.
Placing the right hand of the patient on
confronting persons left ear
56. AGRAPHIA
• Aquired abnormalities of writing
• called apraxic agraphia
• Not associated with alexia
• The usual missing element in incomplete
gerstmann
57. AGRAPHIA
• anterior(BROCA’s)-agrammatism with spelling
mistakes
• Posterior(WERNICKE’S)-unintelligible & non-
sensical
Aphasic
agraphia
• Correct letters and words
• Problem with orientation on a paper
• eg,. Moving on to the next line, wider space on
one side
Visuospatial
agraphia
• Language formation is correct along with spatial
arrangement
• Handwriting loses its personal
characters(becomes a scrawl)
Apraxic
agraphia
58. Testing procedure
A. Spontaneous writing:
1. Interpretation of cookie theft picture
2. Why have u come here?
B. Writing to dictation
C. copying
74. 3. marking locations of objects with
respect to the patient
• Ask the patients to report ten objects in the
room seating him in the middle of the room.
1. Neglect: report items items from only one side
2. Hemianopia: try to compemste by moving their
head a7 eyes to the contralesional space.
75. CONSTRUCTIONAL APRAXIA
• Inability to copy drawings or three
dimensional constructions accurately.
• No difficulty in making relevant individual
movements.
• commonly used diagrams:
1. Necker’s cube
2. Intersecting pentagons
76.
77. EXPLOSION OF THE CONSTITUENT PARTS
SIMPLIFICATION OF THE
DRAWINGS
78. DRESSING APRAXIA(DA)
• Automatic spontaneous capacity for dressing
oneshelf is lost
• Not a true DA if due to ideational or
ideomotor apraxia
• TEST: put on a jacket given to the patient
upside down with its sleeves deliberately
turned upside down.
81. EGOCENTRIC DISORIENTATION
• Dysfunction of localization in space by vision
• Can identify objects
• Have trouble reaching for them & navigating around
them
• Can localize auditory stimuli
• Judge relative location btw objects using proprioceptive
inputs
82. Examples(egocentric d.)
• Bump into things
• Unable to negotiate paths even in familiar
territory
• May walk directly into an obstacle even when
he can see it
• While going towards towards the door the
patient towards the wall & then search for the
door
83. Testing
1. Ask the pt to point in the direction of the
object
2. Touch an object in the visual field
3. Judge the distance of an object
4. Count the no.of objects on a paper placed on
the table
84.
85. Count the number of dots without
pointing at them(ACE)
86. HEADING
DISORIENTATION
• Allocentric
orientation lost
• Can localize objects
wrt their body
• Unable to describe
route fam. Places
• Can not Draw maps
familiar places
• POSTERIOR
CINGULATE
LANDMARK
AGNOSIA
• Inability to
recognize
landmarks
• LINGUAL GYRUS
ANTEROGRADE
DISORIENTATION
• Inability to aquire
novel topographic
memory
• Getting lost easily
in unfamiliar places
• Eg. Tell me the way
to the bathroom to
a hospitalized
patient
• PARA-
HIPPOCAMPUS
• Common in AD
Editor's Notes
ALSO important in color integration and facial recognition.
Visual information from the left occipital lobe reaches directly the left fusiform gyrus.
From the rt occipital lobe has to cross over to (corpus callosum)reach the left fusiform GYRUS.
Or the grapheme perception sysytem
ANGULAR GYRUS- interpretation of visual-verbal materials.
paralexia
Third alexia is agrammatism or difficulty understanding grammars
ALEXIA’S ARE OF TWO TYPES
WE LL HAVE A LOOK AT THE CENTRAL ALEXIA IN PARIETAL LOBE FUNCTION
Copies written language as if it was a foreign language.
Color naming impaired
Which means he has alexia and not aphasia
Explaination: a disconnecgion between the rt intact visual cortex and the left angular gyrus.
Like wernicke’s where reading is impaired more than auditory perception
INFERIOR PARIETAL LOBULE : CONCEPTUAL SYSTEM
SUP. PARIETAL LOBULE: PRODUCTION SYTEM
FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AVERBAL COMMAND
FAILURE TO IMITATE
FAILURE TO HANDLE AN OBJECTY CORRECTLY
FAILURE TO IDENTIFY MOVEMENT PERFORMED BY THE BY THE EXAMINER
MEDIAL PATHWAY : REACHING THE OBJECT
LATERAL PATHWAY: GRASPING AND MANIPULATION THE OBJECT
Transitive movements: activities requiring objects
Act of omission ,misuse and mislocation
Transitive poor in ideational
Improvement with transitive in ideomotor
Spatial errors are the most characteristic
What is the device will u use to put this nail through
For example I m brushing my teeth
Mistakes have been discussed
PANTOMIME MEANS TO EXPRESS MEANINGS WITH GESTURES
TRANSITIVE DOES NOT MEAN WE HAND OVER AN OBJECT TO THE PATIENT
HE KNOWS THE SEQUENCE BUT SEEMS TO HAVE A PROBLEM USING PREVIOUSLY USED THINGS
Posterior part of the dominant inferior parietal lobule.
Carrying over in additions and multiplications
Aquired loss of the ability to perform calculation task
Aquired abnormalities of writing: agraphia
They have been asked to describe the cookie jar picture.
Just like the speech
Handwriting a scribble(APRAXIC AGRAPHIA)
APRAXIC AGRAPHIA
Orientation on a page(VISUOSPATIAL AGRAPHIA)
Multiple streams of sensory data to form a body schema which determines relationship of our body parts to ourselves and to other objects in extra personal space.
Rt-represenattional
One thing we must have noticed is that in all of these cases it’s the keft side of the hemifield that’s neglected.
Important clue could be ……neglect start scanning the page from the right in contrast to normal persons who do so from the left side (bcoz of the writing)
Cortical brain region –angular gyrus of the rt parietal lobe
Despite their visual loss, hemianopic patients direct more eye movements towards their contralesional blind side during visual search [2], [8]. In contrast, the scanpaths of hemineglect patients typically ignore contralesional space [2], [3]. During line bisection, when subjects have to indicate the middle of a line segment [9], hemianopic patients bias their perceived midpoint slightly towards the contralesional side [10], [11], [12], [13] whereas hemineglect patients make large bisection errors towards the ipsilateral side [14], [15]. Studies of eye movements during line bisection show that hemianopic patients cluster fixations at both the contralesional end of the line and a second central location just contralesional to the true midpoint, while hemineglect patients fail to explore the contralesional space and show a broad ipsilesional distribution of fixations
Lets see how does a person with left hemianopia bisects the lines.
Contrary to belief ………………….