Future
Telecommunications
Challenges & opportunities
Professor Peter Cochrane OBE, DSc
Future
Telecommunications
Challenges & opportunities
Professor Peter Cochrane OBE, DSc
Future Communications >6G
NetworldEurope, Lisbon, 07/11/23
ChallengeS
An industry riven by old
thinking & business models
Massive infrastructure and
huge investments
Slow to change always
on the back foot
OTT operators are now
prime service providers
of customer needs
Energy, real estate, and
manpower top heavy
KEY PROBLEMS (1)
Telcos can’t quite believe growth
in customer demand is ‘endless’
KEY PROBLEMS (2) Asking really dumb questions,
and poor business thinking
Why would a customer want:
64 kbit/s
256 kbit/s
2 Mbit/s
10 Mbit/s
100 Mbit/s
1 Gbit/s
10 Gbit/s
????
And what would they do with it?
There is no proven business case?
Missed opportunities: Skype, Zoom,
Teams, Clouds, Streaming, ISP, Apps
Cyber Security, Tower-Free Mobility ++
KEY PROBLEMS (5)
A reliance on suppliers
Death of R&D, deep understanding,
and the rise of retail thinking
Outsourced services
Follow the herd
Short termism
Contractors
“Everyone loves a
dumb customer”
“Box shifting’ thinking/culture”
Specifics
Radical thinking (?) based on projections, engineering,
economics, sustainability, and what is now possible
“Bandwidth is now in
fi
nite & free (wireless +
fi
bre) - we can a
ff
ord to use/waste
it to reduce signal processing complexity, save on equipment, and energy”
“When Bandwidth is free - Distance is irrelevant - and Time is not chargeable
-
fl
at fee service provision greatly reduces billing costs and allows customers
to buy, set up, and control services directly”
local Loop Decades of wasted investments, opportunities,
powered by a determination not to go FTTH/P
$Bns wasted upgrading copper
networks fundamentally unable
to provide the required service
PONs conceived when
fi
bre >$20/m,
today is <$0.05/m - now far cheaper
to install FTTH with a dedicated end
-to-end
fi
bre link
Shared
fi
bre (PONs) are bit rate
limited, asymmetric, and unable
to satisfy future demands
local Loop
Active splitters and distribution points consume
signi
fi
cant amounts of energy, reduce reliability,
limit bandwidth & introduce service asymmetry
Optical
fi
bre cables occupy less duct
space and easily replace old copper
cables to deliver future proof networking
T o b e c l e a r
Lean, low energy, high reliability, future proof
S i m p l e , v e r y l o w c o s t , h i g h
r e l i a b i l i t y , v e r y l o w e n e r g y ,
f u t u r e p r o o f , a n d f a r f e w e r
b u i l d i n g s
D e d i c a t e d f i b r e ( s ) /
c u s t o m e r / b u i l d i n g
W i r e l e s s d o n g l e o n f i b r e
m o d e m f o r 4 & 5 G + W i F i
•>1Gbit/s bi-directional
•100% ducted - no overhead
•WiFi + 3G dongle per terminal
•Future proof and low energy
•Reduced OPEX, CAPEX, Faults
•Profitability improved <12 months
•Company turnover doubled in < 5 years
•New services - 50% of income from overseas
•Island experienced an in
fl
ux of new business
•Dedicated Fibre per customer
J T F T T H 2012
W i r e l e ss r e ac h
Topology, buildings, trees, re
fl
ection limiters
As we move up the spectrum these
coverage limiting factors (+) become
more severe necessitating far more
towers and hotspots!
We can contemplate evermore serious
problems at 26GHz (+) with 6G
An even bigger & overriding problem
is looming due to the energy demands
of the signal processing at each node
JT has the option to deploy 4,5,6G
dongles in every home and o
ffi
ce to
achieve 100% coverage “Perhaps an untapped option is raw wireless over
fi
bre”
Direct Path
Re
fl
ected
Steered
Ampli
fi
ed
Controlled
Penetration
Ampli
fi
cation
Contained
WLAN Signal
Wall = Large
Active/Passive
Array
S M A R T
Ac t i v e
S u r fac e s
Another potential solution, beam
steering smart materials that direct
signal energy to where it is most required,
but it is not clear what the energy cost will be!
6G
5G
4G
3G
2G
1G 2G 3G
2.5G
Voice centric
Same genome 3.5G
~9 years
4G 5G
Data centric
New genome
6G
Smarts centric
Radical genome !
7G?
~3kW
~1kW
G
r
e
a
t
e
r
B
W
M
o
r
e
D
a
t
a
L
o
w
e
r
L
a
t
e
n
c
y
M
o
r
e
T
o
w
e
r
s
D
e
n
s
e
r
N
e
t
H
i
g
h
e
r
P
o
w
e
r
<100kW?
~9 years
~9 years
~9 years
~0.5kW
~10-20kW
IMPLICATIONS
TIP OF THE ICEBeRG ?
THE BIG PICture
S m a r t C i t I E S
SMART HIGHWAYS
SMART SECTORS
N e t w o r k e d f o r L I F E
This redefines the expression - ‘Always On-Line’
Why?
To save the planet and humanity by
powering sustainability!
We have no suitable networks or
wireless systems & technologies!
We will amplify the Cyber Attack
surface by orders of magnitude we
have no e
ff
ective defence !
I4.o: Kernel
New materials, sciences, tech,
engineering, processes, robotics,
intelligences, thinking…
BIO-TECH nano-TECH
AI
AL
QC
Robotics
Superior metals, plastics,
ceramics, electronics and
eletro-optics, mechtranics,
sensors and actuators +++
High efficiency processing
+ forming @ very low energy
& material cost >95% 3/4R
IoT
The IoT as the nervous system of
societies, resources & the planet
BIO-TECH nano-TECH
Lower energy
Lower waste
Less friction
New materials
New industries
New processes
New capabilities
I 4 . 0 c ata ly t i c
s ta r t i n g p o i n t
AI
AL
QC
Robotics
S E L F H E A L I N G
D U M B t o S M A R T
Wired and wireless vehicle IoT
D o z e n s o f s e n s o r s ,
r e c o r d e r s , c o n t r o l
u n i t s , a g g r e g a t e d b y
o n - b o a rd a n a l y s i s w i t h
I o T / I n t e r n e t c o n n e c t
v i a m u l t i p l e c h a n n e l s
WiFi,3, 4, 5G Direct
to Service Centre
Communication
Direct Car-to-Car
Avoiding 3, 4, 5G Congestion
R E TA I L
W A S T E
We over manufacture/produce due
to outdated logistics systems !
Categories
Devices
Sensors
Vehicles
Systems
Buildings
Wearables
Appliances
Components
Infrastructure
Function
Safety
Security
Logistics
Inventories
Monitoring Use
Industrial Control
Monitoring Health
Historical Records
Environmental Control
Purpose
Repair
ReUse
Recycle
RePurpose
Materials Recovery
Environmental Policing
Performance Assurance
Maintenance Scheduling
++++
THE Categorising of
T H I N G S i s E n d l e s s
Lists of this kind see estimates
of 30 - 100 Bn IoT Things
2000 04 08 12 16 2020
Initial Over
Optimism
Corrective
Pessimism
50
10
20
30
40
Actuality Following
Moore’s
Commercial IoT
‘Things’ Forecast
2030 - 50 looks to BE
a d i f f e r e n t p i c t u r e
LoRaWan 4/5G/LTE WiFi BlueTooth ZigNee
Range ~20km ~10km ~100m ~50m ~50m
BitRate ~50kb/s ~1Mbit/s ~500Mbit/s ~1Mbit/s ~200kb/s
Power Low High Medium Low Low
Topology Star Star Star-Mesh
P2P, Star,
Mesh, Broadcast
Star
Cost/Module ~$10 ~$20 ~$5 ~$3
~$15
sample IoT wireless
All energy and space hungry, too expensive, too
complex, & do not fit future operational needs
Recorded power
received over a
24 hour period
Mehdawi (2013). Spectrum
Occupancy Survey HULL
Artificial spectrum crowding
DUE To old wireless model
Allocated Bandwidth
Active Bandwidth
Band Occupancy
=
Even VHF & UHF Seldom
> 20%
Occupancy
So FULL YET
So EMPTY !
O2
O2
H2O
H2O
<1.0% <0.01%
A natural
fi
lter for high
density short distance
networking
50
10
dB/km 1
0.1
0.01
0.0010
10 20 30 GHz 100 200 400
Occupancy <10%
NO spectrum Shortage!
Degrees of
f r e e d o m
S/N
Frequency
Time
I = k.B.T.log2(1+kS/N)
Invisible @ >10dB below the thermal noise
Think information volume
and not signal space !
The same information conveyed by different
combinations of S/N , BW and Time
100% digital realisation, ultra low energy (µW- pW)
signalling << thermal noise over very short distances
with little/no control of frequency occupancy
BW ~ 500MHz
U W B - T O - H y p e r ( H W B )
All digital no analogue - mixers, amplifies, filters
UWB
HWB Hyper Wide Band
BW ~ 50GHz
Negates phase noise, oscillator stability, scattering, interference,
reflections, improves security and link resilience…
<1bit/Hz
<<1bit/Hz
Active Node
Repeater Node
Last Hop Node
NOTE 1: A simplified 3 hop
network is shown for clarity -
5 hop limits may be ideal…
Last Hop Vector sees
no further propagation
Aggregating Access Node
Common practice depicts nets as 2D, static,
and planar, which they are not! The grey
layer indicates further hidden dimensions.
CoNceptual
IOT MESHNET
CoNceptual
S I M U L AT I O N
In this simple (all nodes are equal) simulation
the predominance of dynamic clustering is
soon evident having started from a random
distribution
So what Of
S e c u r i t y
Nothing from our past
fi
ts the bill
and we need something new!
The Iot will magnify
the attack surface
We are already losing the cyber
war hands down and the ‘Dark
Side’ earnings are now over
$28Tn per year
Legacy thinking and tech
will see us wide open to
attack and completely
defenceless
AI must replace humans
in this domain - and we
need a new operating
philosophy
Auto-immunity
Mirrors biological forebears
ICs
ISPs
WiFi
Hubs
LANs
Cards
Traffic
Servers
Circuits
Devices
Internet
Networks
Organisations
Companies
Platforms
Groups
People
Mobile
Fixed
Autonomous and evolutionary
Relentless everywhere 365 x 24 x 7
Can
W
E EMULATE THIS
BIO
Phalange IN
THE
SILICON
W
ORLD
Broadcasting
Malware
Responding
with updated
protection Wider
Network
Updated
Latest
Solution
Update
Dynamic isolation of infected
devices and components
leading to repair
A mix of clean and infected
Auto-immunity
Prediction
/Surprise
“The IoT will see the spontaneous emergence
of new forms of Arti
fi
cial Intelligence”
Things that think want to link
and
Things that link want to think
Natural
Process
Linking at an atomic, molecular, cellular and
organism level occurs throughout the biological
world, and it happens in the electronic world too !
Things that think want to link
and
Things that link want to think
T H E L a s t B I G
Q u e s t i o n ?
“Will we be smart enough to recognise
new intelligences when they
spontaneously appear”
Th
e
fu
ture belongs
to
th
e
most adaptable and
th
ose
who dare !
Th
ank You
petercochrane.com

Future Telecoms Challenges & Opportunities

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Future Telecommunications Challenges & opportunities ProfessorPeter Cochrane OBE, DSc Future Communications >6G NetworldEurope, Lisbon, 07/11/23
  • 3.
    ChallengeS An industry rivenby old thinking & business models Massive infrastructure and huge investments Slow to change always on the back foot OTT operators are now prime service providers of customer needs Energy, real estate, and manpower top heavy
  • 4.
    KEY PROBLEMS (1) Telcoscan’t quite believe growth in customer demand is ‘endless’
  • 5.
    KEY PROBLEMS (2)Asking really dumb questions, and poor business thinking Why would a customer want: 64 kbit/s 256 kbit/s 2 Mbit/s 10 Mbit/s 100 Mbit/s 1 Gbit/s 10 Gbit/s ???? And what would they do with it? There is no proven business case? Missed opportunities: Skype, Zoom, Teams, Clouds, Streaming, ISP, Apps Cyber Security, Tower-Free Mobility ++
  • 6.
    KEY PROBLEMS (5) Areliance on suppliers Death of R&D, deep understanding, and the rise of retail thinking Outsourced services Follow the herd Short termism Contractors “Everyone loves a dumb customer” “Box shifting’ thinking/culture”
  • 7.
    Specifics Radical thinking (?)based on projections, engineering, economics, sustainability, and what is now possible “Bandwidth is now in fi nite & free (wireless + fi bre) - we can a ff ord to use/waste it to reduce signal processing complexity, save on equipment, and energy” “When Bandwidth is free - Distance is irrelevant - and Time is not chargeable - fl at fee service provision greatly reduces billing costs and allows customers to buy, set up, and control services directly”
  • 8.
    local Loop Decadesof wasted investments, opportunities, powered by a determination not to go FTTH/P $Bns wasted upgrading copper networks fundamentally unable to provide the required service PONs conceived when fi bre >$20/m, today is <$0.05/m - now far cheaper to install FTTH with a dedicated end -to-end fi bre link Shared fi bre (PONs) are bit rate limited, asymmetric, and unable to satisfy future demands
  • 9.
    local Loop Active splittersand distribution points consume signi fi cant amounts of energy, reduce reliability, limit bandwidth & introduce service asymmetry Optical fi bre cables occupy less duct space and easily replace old copper cables to deliver future proof networking
  • 10.
    T o be c l e a r Lean, low energy, high reliability, future proof S i m p l e , v e r y l o w c o s t , h i g h r e l i a b i l i t y , v e r y l o w e n e r g y , f u t u r e p r o o f , a n d f a r f e w e r b u i l d i n g s D e d i c a t e d f i b r e ( s ) / c u s t o m e r / b u i l d i n g W i r e l e s s d o n g l e o n f i b r e m o d e m f o r 4 & 5 G + W i F i
  • 11.
    •>1Gbit/s bi-directional •100% ducted- no overhead •WiFi + 3G dongle per terminal •Future proof and low energy •Reduced OPEX, CAPEX, Faults •Profitability improved <12 months •Company turnover doubled in < 5 years •New services - 50% of income from overseas •Island experienced an in fl ux of new business •Dedicated Fibre per customer J T F T T H 2012
  • 12.
    W i re l e ss r e ac h Topology, buildings, trees, re fl ection limiters As we move up the spectrum these coverage limiting factors (+) become more severe necessitating far more towers and hotspots! We can contemplate evermore serious problems at 26GHz (+) with 6G An even bigger & overriding problem is looming due to the energy demands of the signal processing at each node JT has the option to deploy 4,5,6G dongles in every home and o ffi ce to achieve 100% coverage “Perhaps an untapped option is raw wireless over fi bre”
  • 13.
    Direct Path Re fl ected Steered Ampli fi ed Controlled Penetration Ampli fi cation Contained WLAN Signal Wall= Large Active/Passive Array S M A R T Ac t i v e S u r fac e s Another potential solution, beam steering smart materials that direct signal energy to where it is most required, but it is not clear what the energy cost will be!
  • 14.
    6G 5G 4G 3G 2G 1G 2G 3G 2.5G Voicecentric Same genome 3.5G ~9 years 4G 5G Data centric New genome 6G Smarts centric Radical genome ! 7G? ~3kW ~1kW G r e a t e r B W M o r e D a t a L o w e r L a t e n c y M o r e T o w e r s D e n s e r N e t H i g h e r P o w e r <100kW? ~9 years ~9 years ~9 years ~0.5kW ~10-20kW IMPLICATIONS
  • 15.
    TIP OF THEICEBeRG ? THE BIG PICture S m a r t C i t I E S
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
    N e tw o r k e d f o r L I F E This redefines the expression - ‘Always On-Line’
  • 19.
    Why? To save theplanet and humanity by powering sustainability! We have no suitable networks or wireless systems & technologies! We will amplify the Cyber Attack surface by orders of magnitude we have no e ff ective defence !
  • 20.
    I4.o: Kernel New materials,sciences, tech, engineering, processes, robotics, intelligences, thinking… BIO-TECH nano-TECH AI AL QC Robotics Superior metals, plastics, ceramics, electronics and eletro-optics, mechtranics, sensors and actuators +++ High efficiency processing + forming @ very low energy & material cost >95% 3/4R
  • 21.
    IoT The IoT asthe nervous system of societies, resources & the planet BIO-TECH nano-TECH Lower energy Lower waste Less friction New materials New industries New processes New capabilities I 4 . 0 c ata ly t i c s ta r t i n g p o i n t AI AL QC Robotics
  • 22.
    S E LF H E A L I N G
  • 23.
    D U MB t o S M A R T Wired and wireless vehicle IoT D o z e n s o f s e n s o r s , r e c o r d e r s , c o n t r o l u n i t s , a g g r e g a t e d b y o n - b o a rd a n a l y s i s w i t h I o T / I n t e r n e t c o n n e c t v i a m u l t i p l e c h a n n e l s WiFi,3, 4, 5G Direct to Service Centre Communication Direct Car-to-Car Avoiding 3, 4, 5G Congestion
  • 24.
    R E TAI L W A S T E We over manufacture/produce due to outdated logistics systems !
  • 25.
    Categories Devices Sensors Vehicles Systems Buildings Wearables Appliances Components Infrastructure Function Safety Security Logistics Inventories Monitoring Use Industrial Control MonitoringHealth Historical Records Environmental Control Purpose Repair ReUse Recycle RePurpose Materials Recovery Environmental Policing Performance Assurance Maintenance Scheduling ++++ THE Categorising of T H I N G S i s E n d l e s s Lists of this kind see estimates of 30 - 100 Bn IoT Things
  • 26.
    2000 04 0812 16 2020 Initial Over Optimism Corrective Pessimism 50 10 20 30 40 Actuality Following Moore’s Commercial IoT ‘Things’ Forecast 2030 - 50 looks to BE a d i f f e r e n t p i c t u r e
  • 27.
    LoRaWan 4/5G/LTE WiFiBlueTooth ZigNee Range ~20km ~10km ~100m ~50m ~50m BitRate ~50kb/s ~1Mbit/s ~500Mbit/s ~1Mbit/s ~200kb/s Power Low High Medium Low Low Topology Star Star Star-Mesh P2P, Star, Mesh, Broadcast Star Cost/Module ~$10 ~$20 ~$5 ~$3 ~$15 sample IoT wireless All energy and space hungry, too expensive, too complex, & do not fit future operational needs
  • 28.
    Recorded power received overa 24 hour period Mehdawi (2013). Spectrum Occupancy Survey HULL Artificial spectrum crowding DUE To old wireless model
  • 29.
    Allocated Bandwidth Active Bandwidth BandOccupancy = Even VHF & UHF Seldom > 20% Occupancy So FULL YET So EMPTY !
  • 30.
    O2 O2 H2O H2O <1.0% <0.01% A natural fi lterfor high density short distance networking 50 10 dB/km 1 0.1 0.01 0.0010 10 20 30 GHz 100 200 400 Occupancy <10% NO spectrum Shortage!
  • 31.
    Degrees of f re e d o m S/N Frequency Time I = k.B.T.log2(1+kS/N) Invisible @ >10dB below the thermal noise Think information volume and not signal space ! The same information conveyed by different combinations of S/N , BW and Time 100% digital realisation, ultra low energy (µW- pW) signalling << thermal noise over very short distances with little/no control of frequency occupancy
  • 32.
    BW ~ 500MHz UW B - T O - H y p e r ( H W B ) All digital no analogue - mixers, amplifies, filters UWB HWB Hyper Wide Band BW ~ 50GHz Negates phase noise, oscillator stability, scattering, interference, reflections, improves security and link resilience… <1bit/Hz <<1bit/Hz
  • 33.
    Active Node Repeater Node LastHop Node NOTE 1: A simplified 3 hop network is shown for clarity - 5 hop limits may be ideal… Last Hop Vector sees no further propagation Aggregating Access Node Common practice depicts nets as 2D, static, and planar, which they are not! The grey layer indicates further hidden dimensions. CoNceptual IOT MESHNET
  • 34.
    CoNceptual S I MU L AT I O N In this simple (all nodes are equal) simulation the predominance of dynamic clustering is soon evident having started from a random distribution
  • 35.
    So what Of Se c u r i t y Nothing from our past fi ts the bill and we need something new!
  • 36.
    The Iot willmagnify the attack surface We are already losing the cyber war hands down and the ‘Dark Side’ earnings are now over $28Tn per year Legacy thinking and tech will see us wide open to attack and completely defenceless AI must replace humans in this domain - and we need a new operating philosophy
  • 37.
  • 38.
    Broadcasting Malware Responding with updated protection Wider Network Updated Latest Solution Update Dynamicisolation of infected devices and components leading to repair A mix of clean and infected Auto-immunity
  • 39.
    Prediction /Surprise “The IoT willsee the spontaneous emergence of new forms of Arti fi cial Intelligence” Things that think want to link and Things that link want to think
  • 40.
    Natural Process Linking at anatomic, molecular, cellular and organism level occurs throughout the biological world, and it happens in the electronic world too ! Things that think want to link and Things that link want to think
  • 41.
    T H EL a s t B I G Q u e s t i o n ? “Will we be smart enough to recognise new intelligences when they spontaneously appear”
  • 42.
    Th e fu ture belongs to th e most adaptableand th ose who dare ! Th ank You petercochrane.com