This document discusses various aspects of plagiarism in research including definitions, forms, causes, and ethical issues. It defines plagiarism as using others' work without proper attribution or acknowledgement. Ten main forms of plagiarism are identified based on a survey, including verbatim copying, significant portions copied from one source, and properly citing sources but relying too closely on the original work. Causes of plagiarism discussed include study pressure, lack of referencing skills, and careless attitudes. The document also covers ethics in research such as maintaining integrity, confidentiality, and avoiding discrimination.
This document provides an overview of various bibliometric tools and metrics for measuring scientific output and impact. It discusses journal ranking metrics like impact factor, eigenfactor, SNIP, and SJR. It also covers article-level metrics including F1000 factors and citation analysis tools from Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus. Additionally, it introduces author-level metrics such as the h-index and its variants that can be calculated using various databases and tools. Finally, the document briefly discusses altmetrics and ways to track scholarly impact on social media and the open web.
When publishing research, one needs to be aware of all such actions that are unethical and hence, must be avoided. This presentation gives an overview of the topic.
This document discusses publication ethics and outlines guidelines for ethical publishing. It begins by defining publication and the key parties involved - authors, editors, peer reviewers, and publishers. Authors should contribute significantly to the work and properly attribute contributions from others. Unethical practices include guest and gift authorships, plagiarism, and research fraud through fabrication or falsification of data. Conflicts of interest should be disclosed. Predatory journals are identified as having questionable standards and practices aimed at profit rather than quality. UGC works to identify and remove predatory journals from their listings to help researchers identify legitimate publication options. Overall the document provides guidance on ethical authorship, reviewing, editing and publishing of research.
This document discusses scientific misconduct and responsible research practices. It defines scientific misconduct as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in research. This includes making up data, manipulating research materials to misrepresent results, and using other's ideas without credit. Responsible research involves following approved protocols, protecting participants, accurately recording and sharing results, and publishing ethically. Maintaining integrity is important to ensure reliable research and public trust.
Predatory publishers and journals exploit academic authors by charging publication fees without providing proper editorial and quality review services. They prioritize profits over quality. Characteristics include lack of peer review, editorial boards, and transparency about fees and operations. Jeffrey Beall created criteria to help identify predatory journals, and Cabell's Blacklist now catalogs over 4,000 questionable journals. Savitribai Phule Pune University developed a software tool to help researchers identify predatory publications. Several journal selection tools can also help match articles to legitimate journals.
This document discusses various publication ethics issues including duplicate publication, authorship, scientific misconduct, and conflicts of interest. It provides definitions and examples of these issues, noting that journals exist to enhance the scientific database but also other interests like profits. The document cites a study that found around 0.04% of papers involved plagiarism and 1.35% involved duplicate publication. It discusses best practices for authorship including determining order upfront and documenting responsibilities. Conflicts of interest can mislead readers and include financial, personal, political or academic interests. The Committee on Publication Ethics was founded to address integrity concerns in medical journal publishing.
1) A journal can refer to a daily record of events, a newspaper or periodical published regularly, or the record of a scholarly society.
2) In academia, a journal is a serious, peer-reviewed scholarly publication.
3) There are several tools that can help researchers identify the best journal to publish their work, such as by matching keywords, subject area, target audience, and journal metrics and standards. These tools analyze the manuscript and recommend suitable journals.
This document provides an overview of various bibliometric tools and metrics for measuring scientific output and impact. It discusses journal ranking metrics like impact factor, eigenfactor, SNIP, and SJR. It also covers article-level metrics including F1000 factors and citation analysis tools from Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus. Additionally, it introduces author-level metrics such as the h-index and its variants that can be calculated using various databases and tools. Finally, the document briefly discusses altmetrics and ways to track scholarly impact on social media and the open web.
When publishing research, one needs to be aware of all such actions that are unethical and hence, must be avoided. This presentation gives an overview of the topic.
This document discusses publication ethics and outlines guidelines for ethical publishing. It begins by defining publication and the key parties involved - authors, editors, peer reviewers, and publishers. Authors should contribute significantly to the work and properly attribute contributions from others. Unethical practices include guest and gift authorships, plagiarism, and research fraud through fabrication or falsification of data. Conflicts of interest should be disclosed. Predatory journals are identified as having questionable standards and practices aimed at profit rather than quality. UGC works to identify and remove predatory journals from their listings to help researchers identify legitimate publication options. Overall the document provides guidance on ethical authorship, reviewing, editing and publishing of research.
This document discusses scientific misconduct and responsible research practices. It defines scientific misconduct as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in research. This includes making up data, manipulating research materials to misrepresent results, and using other's ideas without credit. Responsible research involves following approved protocols, protecting participants, accurately recording and sharing results, and publishing ethically. Maintaining integrity is important to ensure reliable research and public trust.
Predatory publishers and journals exploit academic authors by charging publication fees without providing proper editorial and quality review services. They prioritize profits over quality. Characteristics include lack of peer review, editorial boards, and transparency about fees and operations. Jeffrey Beall created criteria to help identify predatory journals, and Cabell's Blacklist now catalogs over 4,000 questionable journals. Savitribai Phule Pune University developed a software tool to help researchers identify predatory publications. Several journal selection tools can also help match articles to legitimate journals.
This document discusses various publication ethics issues including duplicate publication, authorship, scientific misconduct, and conflicts of interest. It provides definitions and examples of these issues, noting that journals exist to enhance the scientific database but also other interests like profits. The document cites a study that found around 0.04% of papers involved plagiarism and 1.35% involved duplicate publication. It discusses best practices for authorship including determining order upfront and documenting responsibilities. Conflicts of interest can mislead readers and include financial, personal, political or academic interests. The Committee on Publication Ethics was founded to address integrity concerns in medical journal publishing.
1) A journal can refer to a daily record of events, a newspaper or periodical published regularly, or the record of a scholarly society.
2) In academia, a journal is a serious, peer-reviewed scholarly publication.
3) There are several tools that can help researchers identify the best journal to publish their work, such as by matching keywords, subject area, target audience, and journal metrics and standards. These tools analyze the manuscript and recommend suitable journals.
Violation of publication ethics can take several forms, including data manipulation, duplicate publication, simultaneous submission, plagiarism, and salami slicing. Upholding publication ethics is important to establish the integrity and credibility of scholarly research. It is the responsibility of authors to avoid fabricating or manipulating data, plagiarizing, submitting manuscripts to multiple journals simultaneously, or including guest authors who did not meaningfully contribute. Organizations like COPE and ICMJE provide guidelines to help authors, editors, and reviewers maintain high standards of ethical publication practices.
Selective reporting and misrepresentation of data can lead to false conclusions and flawed decision making. Selective reporting involves intentionally presenting only information that supports a viewpoint while ignoring contradictory information. Misrepresentation distorts data to create a false impression. Both can occur through publication bias, outcome reporting bias, data dredging, spin, selective citation, data falsification, cherry-picking, manipulation, misinterpretation, and omission. Researchers should ensure transparency, present all relevant data, use appropriate statistical methods, verify sources, obtain independent review, follow ethical standards, and acknowledge limitations to avoid these issues.
Publication misconduct refers to unethical behavior in publishing, such as fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, inappropriate authorship, and duplicate or overlapping publications. It undermines the integrity of research. Reasons for misconduct include career pressures, lack of training, and inadequate supervision. Consequences include losing one's career and destroying public trust in researchers. Key types of misconduct are fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, inappropriate authorship, duplicate submission, overlapping publication, and salami publishing. Retractions can help make misconduct visible but have limitations as they may not provide full details or be widely disseminated. More transparency is needed regarding misconduct to help prevent and address it.
This presentation in intended to introduce Open Access (OA); the OA movement; OA advantages for authors, institutions and society; OA business models and publishing in OA; important tools for research and publishing; and other ‘open’ initiatives.
This document discusses journal performance metrics available through Journal Citation Reports on the ISI Web of Knowledge. It defines common metrics like the Journal Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Journal Cited Half-Life, Eigenfactor Score, and Article Influence Score which provide objective means for evaluating leading academic journals. Additional information and questions about Journal Citation Reports can be directed to Linda Galloway.
I explain plainly what is salami silcing, a practice of fragmenting single research into as many publications as possible. Salami publishing and hazards
There are some common criteria you should consider when choosing a journal to publish in. Once you have a publication strategy in place, choose journals that meet all of your criteria.
The document discusses the history and development of open access initiatives for scholarly publications. It notes several important declarations from 2002-2005 that supported open access, including making publications freely available online. It describes how open access initiatives aim to unite organizations in supporting free and unrestricted access to peer-reviewed research. The document also discusses definitions of open access, copyright considerations, launching open access journals, and the Budapest Open Access Initiative of 2002.
Rmc0001 research publications & ethics - module 3 (5)KURMAIAHA20PHD1086
This document discusses publication ethics and responsible research practices. It provides definitions and guidelines around topics like plagiarism, authorship, peer review, and conflicts of interest. It also describes organizations that establish standards and best practices for publication, such as the Committee on Publication Ethics and the World Association of Medical Editors. Finally, it discusses issues like misconduct, causes of unethical behavior, and predatory publishers.
Gives an overview of Open Access Initiatives in India. It covers some Journals, Repositories and other Open Access Initiatives from India. This presentation was made at IGNCA on 1st Feb 2009 in the Seminar on "Digital Preservation and Access to Indian Cultural Heritage with special reference to IGNCA Cultural Knowledge Resources", 31st January - 1st February 2009.
This document provides information about indexing databases and citation databases. It defines a database as a collection of organized information that can be easily accessed and updated. Indexing databases are described as optimizing database performance by minimizing disk accesses during queries through the use of indexes. The document outlines different types of indexing, including clustered, non-clustered, and multi-level indexing. It then defines citation databases as collections of referenced academic works that can be used to evaluate publications by counting citations. The benefits of using citation databases over general search engines are discussed.
This document summarizes a virtual workshop on thesis writing and publication organized by Lavender Literacy Club and Cape Comorin Trust in collaboration with other institutions. It discusses research metrics, which are quantitative measures used to assess scholarly research outputs and impacts. Various metrics are explained, including journal metrics like impact factor, author metrics like h-index, and alternative metrics. The importance of research profiles, publishing ethics, and increasing research visibility and impacts are also covered.
Predatory journals actively solicit manuscripts from researchers but lack proper peer review and editorial boards. They often publish low-quality papers solely to charge publication fees without providing legitimate scholarly services. Researchers should be wary of these journals as publishing in them can corrupt the academic literature and mislead others about the quality of their work. Various studies have exposed predatory journals by getting computer-generated nonsense papers and unqualified scientists accepted. Scholars can check for warning signs like missing or fake editorial boards, poor website quality, and surprise article fees to identify potentially predatory journals.
Ethics is not based on scientific principles but rather on personal value systems. Three key points about research ethics are:
1) Researchers must respect all individuals affected by their research through honest, respectful treatment and ensuring no unreasonable demands are made.
2) Informed consent is required where participants are made aware of how their information will be used and how they will be involved.
3) Confidentiality of personal information must be maintained and anonymity ensured where possible.
This document discusses various ethical issues in scientific research, including intellectual honesty, research integrity, scientific misconduct such as falsification and plagiarism. It addresses principles like duty to society, informed consent, and protecting research participants. Forms of problematic publishing are defined, like duplicate/overlapping publications and "salami slicing" research. Selective reporting or misrepresenting data to bias results undermines reproducibility. Upholding integrity requires monitoring at the individual researcher, work group and institutional levels.
This document discusses research misconduct and issues of reproducibility. It defines research misconduct as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism. While science aims to be self-correcting, many published findings are not reproducible or trustworthy. Several factors make results less likely to be true, such as small studies, small effect sizes, and conflicts of interest. Efforts are underway to improve reproducibility through replicating studies, publishing negative results, and establishing standards for transparent and ethical research.
Open Access (OA) is a system provide access to knowledge resources with free of cost and other restrictions. This PPT answer to the questions what, why, types, benefits etc. and also describes the creative commons licensing, concept of predatory journals, open access journals, and Sharpa RoMeO.
This document discusses scientific misconduct in publishing, including various types of misconduct such as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. It outlines reasons for misconduct like desire for advancement and pressure to publish. Major types discussed include fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, peer review manipulation, inappropriate authorship, citation manipulation, and conflict of interest. Consequences of misconduct are outlined for society, fellow researchers, medical practitioners, and individuals. The Committee on Publication Ethics is presented as a resource for editors on publication ethics issues.
The document discusses open access publishing options, policies, and best practices. It begins with definitions of open access and describes the conventional publication cycle versus open access models. It outlines the green road of self-archiving and gold road of open access journals. It discusses policies from ETH Zurich, Switzerland, and funders like SNSF regarding open access mandates and compliance options. It notes challenges in transitioning to more open access publishing.
Selective reporting and misrepresentation of data undermine the integrity of academic research. Selective reporting refers to intentionally presenting or omitting certain information, data, or results in a biased manner to support a particular viewpoint. There are several types of selective reporting and misrepresentation, including publication bias, outcome reporting bias, data dredging, spin, and selective citation. Upholding honesty, objectivity, and integrity in experimental design, data analysis, and reporting is important. Fabrication, falsification, or misrepresentation of data is unethical. Journals should verify consent forms and data sources if concerns about accuracy or legitimacy arise.
The document discusses plagiarism in higher education institutions and how to avoid it. It defines plagiarism and outlines its various forms according to different studies. Plagiarism can be avoided through a holistic approach at the national, institutional, and individual level. At the national level, policies aim to establish plagiarism prevention guidelines and oversight bodies. Institutions implement measures like educating students and faculty, developing plagiarism policies, and using detection software. Individuals should be taught proper citation practices and research ethics to promote academic integrity.
Violation of publication ethics can take several forms, including data manipulation, duplicate publication, simultaneous submission, plagiarism, and salami slicing. Upholding publication ethics is important to establish the integrity and credibility of scholarly research. It is the responsibility of authors to avoid fabricating or manipulating data, plagiarizing, submitting manuscripts to multiple journals simultaneously, or including guest authors who did not meaningfully contribute. Organizations like COPE and ICMJE provide guidelines to help authors, editors, and reviewers maintain high standards of ethical publication practices.
Selective reporting and misrepresentation of data can lead to false conclusions and flawed decision making. Selective reporting involves intentionally presenting only information that supports a viewpoint while ignoring contradictory information. Misrepresentation distorts data to create a false impression. Both can occur through publication bias, outcome reporting bias, data dredging, spin, selective citation, data falsification, cherry-picking, manipulation, misinterpretation, and omission. Researchers should ensure transparency, present all relevant data, use appropriate statistical methods, verify sources, obtain independent review, follow ethical standards, and acknowledge limitations to avoid these issues.
Publication misconduct refers to unethical behavior in publishing, such as fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, inappropriate authorship, and duplicate or overlapping publications. It undermines the integrity of research. Reasons for misconduct include career pressures, lack of training, and inadequate supervision. Consequences include losing one's career and destroying public trust in researchers. Key types of misconduct are fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, inappropriate authorship, duplicate submission, overlapping publication, and salami publishing. Retractions can help make misconduct visible but have limitations as they may not provide full details or be widely disseminated. More transparency is needed regarding misconduct to help prevent and address it.
This presentation in intended to introduce Open Access (OA); the OA movement; OA advantages for authors, institutions and society; OA business models and publishing in OA; important tools for research and publishing; and other ‘open’ initiatives.
This document discusses journal performance metrics available through Journal Citation Reports on the ISI Web of Knowledge. It defines common metrics like the Journal Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Journal Cited Half-Life, Eigenfactor Score, and Article Influence Score which provide objective means for evaluating leading academic journals. Additional information and questions about Journal Citation Reports can be directed to Linda Galloway.
I explain plainly what is salami silcing, a practice of fragmenting single research into as many publications as possible. Salami publishing and hazards
There are some common criteria you should consider when choosing a journal to publish in. Once you have a publication strategy in place, choose journals that meet all of your criteria.
The document discusses the history and development of open access initiatives for scholarly publications. It notes several important declarations from 2002-2005 that supported open access, including making publications freely available online. It describes how open access initiatives aim to unite organizations in supporting free and unrestricted access to peer-reviewed research. The document also discusses definitions of open access, copyright considerations, launching open access journals, and the Budapest Open Access Initiative of 2002.
Rmc0001 research publications & ethics - module 3 (5)KURMAIAHA20PHD1086
This document discusses publication ethics and responsible research practices. It provides definitions and guidelines around topics like plagiarism, authorship, peer review, and conflicts of interest. It also describes organizations that establish standards and best practices for publication, such as the Committee on Publication Ethics and the World Association of Medical Editors. Finally, it discusses issues like misconduct, causes of unethical behavior, and predatory publishers.
Gives an overview of Open Access Initiatives in India. It covers some Journals, Repositories and other Open Access Initiatives from India. This presentation was made at IGNCA on 1st Feb 2009 in the Seminar on "Digital Preservation and Access to Indian Cultural Heritage with special reference to IGNCA Cultural Knowledge Resources", 31st January - 1st February 2009.
This document provides information about indexing databases and citation databases. It defines a database as a collection of organized information that can be easily accessed and updated. Indexing databases are described as optimizing database performance by minimizing disk accesses during queries through the use of indexes. The document outlines different types of indexing, including clustered, non-clustered, and multi-level indexing. It then defines citation databases as collections of referenced academic works that can be used to evaluate publications by counting citations. The benefits of using citation databases over general search engines are discussed.
This document summarizes a virtual workshop on thesis writing and publication organized by Lavender Literacy Club and Cape Comorin Trust in collaboration with other institutions. It discusses research metrics, which are quantitative measures used to assess scholarly research outputs and impacts. Various metrics are explained, including journal metrics like impact factor, author metrics like h-index, and alternative metrics. The importance of research profiles, publishing ethics, and increasing research visibility and impacts are also covered.
Predatory journals actively solicit manuscripts from researchers but lack proper peer review and editorial boards. They often publish low-quality papers solely to charge publication fees without providing legitimate scholarly services. Researchers should be wary of these journals as publishing in them can corrupt the academic literature and mislead others about the quality of their work. Various studies have exposed predatory journals by getting computer-generated nonsense papers and unqualified scientists accepted. Scholars can check for warning signs like missing or fake editorial boards, poor website quality, and surprise article fees to identify potentially predatory journals.
Ethics is not based on scientific principles but rather on personal value systems. Three key points about research ethics are:
1) Researchers must respect all individuals affected by their research through honest, respectful treatment and ensuring no unreasonable demands are made.
2) Informed consent is required where participants are made aware of how their information will be used and how they will be involved.
3) Confidentiality of personal information must be maintained and anonymity ensured where possible.
This document discusses various ethical issues in scientific research, including intellectual honesty, research integrity, scientific misconduct such as falsification and plagiarism. It addresses principles like duty to society, informed consent, and protecting research participants. Forms of problematic publishing are defined, like duplicate/overlapping publications and "salami slicing" research. Selective reporting or misrepresenting data to bias results undermines reproducibility. Upholding integrity requires monitoring at the individual researcher, work group and institutional levels.
This document discusses research misconduct and issues of reproducibility. It defines research misconduct as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism. While science aims to be self-correcting, many published findings are not reproducible or trustworthy. Several factors make results less likely to be true, such as small studies, small effect sizes, and conflicts of interest. Efforts are underway to improve reproducibility through replicating studies, publishing negative results, and establishing standards for transparent and ethical research.
Open Access (OA) is a system provide access to knowledge resources with free of cost and other restrictions. This PPT answer to the questions what, why, types, benefits etc. and also describes the creative commons licensing, concept of predatory journals, open access journals, and Sharpa RoMeO.
This document discusses scientific misconduct in publishing, including various types of misconduct such as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. It outlines reasons for misconduct like desire for advancement and pressure to publish. Major types discussed include fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, peer review manipulation, inappropriate authorship, citation manipulation, and conflict of interest. Consequences of misconduct are outlined for society, fellow researchers, medical practitioners, and individuals. The Committee on Publication Ethics is presented as a resource for editors on publication ethics issues.
The document discusses open access publishing options, policies, and best practices. It begins with definitions of open access and describes the conventional publication cycle versus open access models. It outlines the green road of self-archiving and gold road of open access journals. It discusses policies from ETH Zurich, Switzerland, and funders like SNSF regarding open access mandates and compliance options. It notes challenges in transitioning to more open access publishing.
Selective reporting and misrepresentation of data undermine the integrity of academic research. Selective reporting refers to intentionally presenting or omitting certain information, data, or results in a biased manner to support a particular viewpoint. There are several types of selective reporting and misrepresentation, including publication bias, outcome reporting bias, data dredging, spin, and selective citation. Upholding honesty, objectivity, and integrity in experimental design, data analysis, and reporting is important. Fabrication, falsification, or misrepresentation of data is unethical. Journals should verify consent forms and data sources if concerns about accuracy or legitimacy arise.
The document discusses plagiarism in higher education institutions and how to avoid it. It defines plagiarism and outlines its various forms according to different studies. Plagiarism can be avoided through a holistic approach at the national, institutional, and individual level. At the national level, policies aim to establish plagiarism prevention guidelines and oversight bodies. Institutions implement measures like educating students and faculty, developing plagiarism policies, and using detection software. Individuals should be taught proper citation practices and research ethics to promote academic integrity.
Ethical and Unethical Methods of Plagiarism Prevention in Academic WritingNader Ale Ebrahim
K. Bakhtiyari, H. Salehi, M. A. Embi, M. Shakiba, A. Zavvari, M. Shahbazi-Moghadam, N. Ale Ebrahim, and M. Mohammadjafari, “Ethical and Unethical Methods of Plagiarism Prevention in Academic Writing,” International Education Studies, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 52-62, 19 June, 2014.
This document discusses academic integrity in scientific publications. It begins by defining an author as someone who has made a significant intellectual contribution to a paper. It notes there are necessary conditions to be considered an author, such as contributing to the design, analysis and interpretation of data. The document also discusses explicit and tacit knowledge, the pressure to "publish or perish", and definitions of plagiarism from Indonesian regulations. It states that plagiarism violates academic ethics and standards. Overall, the document provides background on authorship, knowledge sharing, and defines plagiarism in the context of academic integrity in research publications.
This document discusses research ethics and issues related to academic honesty. It begins by defining ethical issues in computer science research as how professionals make ethical decisions. It then discusses five key principles of ethical research: truthfulness and confidentiality, autonomy and informed consent, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. The document also discusses the importance of avoiding plagiarism, falsification, and fabrication. It defines these terms and provides examples of each. Finally, it discusses the importance of academic honesty and defines misleading authorship as an unethical practice.
This document discusses plagiarism and academic integrity. It defines plagiarism as presenting another's work as one's own, whether intentionally or unintentionally, and notes the consequences can include penalties, job loss, and damage to reputation. It outlines different forms of plagiarism and discusses how to avoid it by properly citing sources and distinguishing personal ideas from others' content. Maintaining academic integrity requires honesty, trust, fairness, respect and responsibility in scholarly work.
The document discusses various ethical issues that researchers may face, including where students learn ethical decision making, definitions of plagiarism and responsible authorship, detecting plagiarism in papers, examples of scientific misconduct, and the responsibilities of authors and journals in maintaining integrity in scientific publishing. It provides guidance on ethical research practices for avoiding misconduct like fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism.
This document summarizes a presentation on research ethics and scientific publication. It discusses author responsibilities including submitting original work and obtaining proper permissions. It defines plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other ethical violations. It provides examples of plagiarized papers that were retracted from journals. It discusses how journals detect problems, handle ethical violations, and work to uphold integrity. It emphasizes sharing knowledge through peer-reviewed publication and the importance of ethical conduct in research.
Students Responses To Plagiarism Thesis Making (Study at Law Faculty of Muham...inventionjournals
The purpose of this study was to analyze the responses and views of law students against plagiarism behavior that is quite common among college students, and motivation that led to the behavior of plagiarism rife among students, as well as regulations on plagiarism. The experiment was conducted using reseacrh and development models and methods of the survey, with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Data retrieved through the instrument and interviews, as well as the source of data is the students of the Faculty of Law, University of North Sumatra Muhammadiyah, with the number of respondents 600 semester students 8. The results show that: the behavior of plagiarism among students have an average to agree 36%; motivation plagiarism among students, has an average for the category agree 27%; media socialization early prevention of plagiarism had average for the category agree 48%. Internally the occurrence of plagiarism because laziness, stress, fear of failure, pessimism, the view that the act of plagiarism is not a thing wrong, and feel such actions are not known to others. Externally plagiarism occurred because the institutions are not firm, and fear of negative image on the institutions.
How do you define research ethics? Discuss Ethics and the Research Process. ...Md. Sajjat Hossain
How do you define research ethics? Discuss Ethics and the Research Process. Why researcher should be ethical. Discuss General Ethical Theories and Ethical Principles. What are the Specific Ethical Problems? Describe Ethics and Online Research.
Ethics are the moral principles that a person must follow, irrespective of the place or time. Behaving ethically involves doing the right thing at the right time. Research ethics focus on the moral principles that researchers must follow in their respective fields of research.
This document provides information on quantitative and qualitative research methods. Quantitative research uses measurable data and statistics, while qualitative research seeks an in-depth understanding through naturalistic processes focused on human experiences, words, and meanings. Examples are given of qualitative research studies across different fields, including a study exploring why social media use makes people happy, a study on black women's sense of belonging in STEM fields, and a study analyzing gallery talks through a social phenomenological method.
The document discusses the importance of research and publication. It states that without research and publications, science cannot progress and individuals may not get placements, promotions, or have their projects sanctioned. Publications and research keep individuals ahead of their communities and colleagues, and make their work "immortal." It emphasizes that a publication is anything published, such as a book, research paper, or news article, and a research paper describes the output of research. If published in a journal or conference, it is considered a published research paper.
This document discusses research ethics from an Islamic perspective. It begins by defining ethics and exploring ethics in Islam's history. It then discusses ethics in different aspects of research, including objectives of research ethics, ethics that should be followed at different research stages, and ethical issues like informed consent, privacy, and deception. The document also examines sources of tension in research ethics between principles like beneficence and human dignity. It outlines researchers' responsibilities to participants and the research community, such as protecting safety, reputation and enabling further research. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of awareness and understanding of ethical issues in research.
Ethics in medical sciences research may not always translate into ethical publications.
Ethical violations in conducting medical research always promote unethical scientific publications.
Published research influences other researchers and establishes credibility for individual or journal.
Beyond Open Access: Open Science and Research IntegrityHeidi Laine
Presentation given at the 2015 Academic Mindtrek Conference at the workshop "Beyond Open Access: The changing culture of producing and disseminating scientific knowledge". Workshop was organised by the Open Knowledge Foundation Finland Open Science Working Group.
Research Methodology: Why it Matters? (1).pptxRinkalDangar
The document discusses the importance of research methodology. It begins by defining methodology as a set of methods and procedures used in research. It then discusses how methodology guides the research process, ensures validity and reliability, minimizes bias, allows replication, facilitates generalization, enhances ethical considerations, and optimizes resource use. The document also discusses various research methods like oral history, visual methodologies, discourse analysis, ethnographic methods, textual analysis, interviewing, creative writing, and digital humanities. It concludes by stating that methodology is essential in research for producing valid and reliable findings.
An overview of ethical research practices by Malcolm MacLean, Chair of UoG Research Ethics Committee.
Reader in the Culture & History of Sport, Faculty of Applied Sciences
Similar to Confronting ethical issues in research for avoiding plagiarism (20)
Plagiarism and its relevance in academics.pptxDr. Utpal Das
Plagiarism is one of the growing concepts in the field of education and having and acquiring knowledge about it by researchers is one of the relevant aspects of research.
Understanding IPR and Copyright Law Presentation Jorhat Kendriya Mahavidyalay...Dr. Utpal Das
Understanding IPR and Copyright Law are important for the general public. Librarians are the stakeholders in making the general public aware of these rights to its users.
How to avoid plagiarism while thesis writing.pptxDr. Utpal Das
Avoiding plagiarism while writing a thesis during the Ph.D. program. Different types of plagiarism exist which need to be addressed by the researchers to avoid unethical practices.
Role of College Libraries in meeting user’s information needs issues and chal...Dr. Utpal Das
The document discusses the role and issues facing college libraries in India in the digital era. It outlines the objectives of college libraries as enriching academic activities, providing information/knowledge support, providing electronic access to resources, preserving intellectual assets, and generating awareness through literacy programs. It also examines challenges such as limited budgets, poor infrastructure, increased R&D in ICT, information overload, pressure from agencies, and lack of human resources. Finally, it explores how the digital shift is impacting functions like collections, access, services, and archiving.
This document discusses the basics of subject indexing in libraries. It defines subject indexing as providing subject access to microdocuments like journal articles and research reports by assigning appropriate subject terms. The key points covered are:
- Subject indexing allows users to identify documents on a given subject and find related documents.
- Indexes are helpful for retrieving information from both print and digital collections. They provide subject access through assigned terms.
- Effective subject indexing requires identifying the main concepts in a document and re-expressing them as index terms so the document and terms express the same concepts.
- Principles of indexing include using terminology familiar to users and bringing related documents together under consistent, unambiguous headings. Specificity and exhaustivity must
Avoiding plagiarism in this era of digital availabilityDr. Utpal Das
This document discusses avoiding plagiarism in research. It defines research and outlines some key characteristics like novelty and originality. It also discusses research ethics and integrity, noting that ethics govern researchers' behavior and distinguish right from wrong. The document outlines six key principles for ethical research according to the Economic and Social Research Council in the UK. It provides examples of ethical principles researchers should follow, such as honesty, objectivity, integrity, and respecting intellectual property. The document concludes by defining three types of research misconduct: fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism.
Confronting ethical issues in research for avoiding plagiarismDr. Utpal Das
1) The document discusses confronting ethical issues in research and avoiding plagiarism. It defines research, academic integrity, and discusses the key characteristics of novelty and originality in research works.
2) Ten main forms of plagiarism are identified based on a survey, including clone, ctrl-c, find-replace, remix, recycle, hybrid, mashup, 404 error, aggregator, and re-tweet. Ethical issues in research like research design, data source, informed consent, copyright, and plagiarism are also discussed.
3) Avoiding academic plagiarism requires a holistic approach including national level regulations and policies, institutional prevention measures, and principles for individuals to follow.
Truth, fact and ethics in academic researchDr. Utpal Das
Truth in academic research refers to facts that have been proven through repeated experiments and evidence. Scientific truths must be reproducible, verifiable, and falsifiable. Facts are statements that have been proven true through evidence, while opinions and beliefs are not necessarily based on evidence. Research ethics provide guidelines for responsible and moral conduct in research to maximize benefits and minimize harms. Key principles include honesty, objectivity, integrity, openness, respecting intellectual property, confidentiality, and non-discrimination.
Ethics in academic research: avoiding plagiarismDr. Utpal Das
This document discusses ethics in academic research and avoiding plagiarism. It defines academic research as time-bound, investigative in nature, leading to an academic degree or enhancing knowledge. Exploratory research is described as limitless in time and leading to path breaking discoveries. The document outlines characteristics of facts, opinions, and beliefs and how to distinguish between them. It also discusses research misconduct, principles of research ethics, and some key ethical considerations in conducting academic research.
Success and growth of Dibrugarh University Library during new normalDr. Utpal Das
1) The library at Dibrugarh University adapted policies and practices to operate safely during the COVID-19 pandemic, referred to as the "new normal".
2) Measures included curbside book drop-off, quarantining returned items, converting services to social distancing, and increasing access to online resources.
3) While limiting physical access, the library also aimed to maximize use of resources by improving its digital offerings, procuring more e-resources, and communicating with users through social media and other digital channels.
Information seeking and information use behaviour in librariesDr. Utpal Das
The document discusses how information seeking and use behaviors have changed with disruptive technologies over time. Specifically, it notes the paradigm shift brought about by digital transformation, which has significantly changed behaviors from print-based to online/electronic. This is due to factors like the extensive use of ICT, exponential growth of the internet and digital media, and the convenience of online accessibility. As a result, libraries have also had to change and now provide both print and electronic resources, as well as platforms for online access. Survey results show this trend towards electronic resources and decline in print materials. Overall, digital transformation has fundamentally changed how users seek and interact with information.
The document discusses the concept of information literacy in various contexts. It defines information literacy and related terms. It discusses the needs and purpose of information literacy programs in the changing education system and with the growth of digital information. Finally, it examines the role of information literacy in society, work, education, health and well-being.
Chemical factors of deterioration of documentsDr. Utpal Das
This document discusses chemical factors that contribute to the deterioration of documents, including acidity, browning of paper, reactions with ink, and the actions of pigments. It focuses on acidity, which can intrinsically exist in wood-origin manuscripts and papers due to various acidic components. Acidic gases in the air can also deteriorate documents through chemical reactions with cellulose. The document then examines specific chemical issues like browning of paper through oxidation, damage caused by acidic iron-gall ink, and reactions of some metal-based pigments. It concludes by outlining several deacidification processes pioneered by W.J. Barrow to neutralize acidity, including using calcium hydroxide, calcium bicarbonate
Remedies for biological deterioration of wood origin documentary heritageDr. Utpal Das
1. Proper control of temperature and relative humidity is key to preventing biological deterioration of documents as specific levels promote microbial and fungal growth.
2. Both air conditioning and HVAC systems can be used to maintain optimal temperature and humidity, but require constant monitoring and adjustment.
3. Relative humidity also affects paper chemistry and dimensional stability, with both high and fluctuating levels causing damage.
4. Various chemical, physical, and integrated pest management approaches are recommended to control insects, mold, and other organisms infesting documents.
Definition, factors and actions of preservation of ManuscriptsDr. Utpal Das
This document defines key terms related to the preservation of manuscripts and outlines factors that can lead to the deterioration of manuscripts as well as actions that can be taken to preserve them. It defines preservation, conservation, restoration, and reformatting and discusses the goals of each. The main factors that can cause deterioration are environmental conditions like temperature and humidity, biological agents like insects and mold, chemical composition of the manuscripts, man-made factors like improper handling, and natural disasters. Specific techniques for controlling temperature, humidity, and biological infestations are also outlined.
Manuscripts: Concept, Importance and History of manuscripts in AssamDr. Utpal Das
This document provides definitions and context around manuscripts in Assam. It begins by defining manuscripts based on dictionaries and Assamese terminology. It describes the various writing materials used in ancient Assam, including wood, copper plates, rock inscriptions, and clay seals. The importance of manuscripts is discussed in terms of preserving history, being repositories of knowledge, supporting hidden economies, and enabling education and research. The history of manuscripts in Assam is divided into ancient, medieval, and modern periods, with examples given of manuscript types from each era. Subjects of medieval Assamese manuscripts are listed along with some paintings from medieval Assam artists.
The document discusses the components and design of information storage and retrieval systems (ISRS). It describes ISRS as having three main components: the user interface, knowledge base, and search agent. The user interface allows users to input queries and view results, and should be intuitive. The knowledge base stores the information to be retrieved in a database. And the search agent acts to translate user queries and match them to the knowledge base to retrieve relevant information. The document provides details on each of these components and discusses best practices for designing an effective ISRS.
Indexing language concept types and characteristicsDr. Utpal Das
This document discusses subject indexing languages. It defines subject indexing language as a set of controlled vocabulary terms and their relationships that are used to describe the concepts in documents. There are three main types of indexing languages: natural language, which uses terms directly from the document; controlled vocabulary, which uses standardized terms from an authority list; and free indexing language, which uses any terms. The key aspects of subject indexing languages are that they allow concepts from documents to be represented in a structured way to facilitate information retrieval.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
3. According to The Research Excellence
Framework, (2014)
Research is “ leading
to , ”
Research is a
are central to the research process.
a process of investigation
new insights effectively shared
multi-stage process
Ethics
5. Novelty and originality of a research work is
holistically depended on 3 main aspects:
Experimental or observed facts
Analytic/scientific truth
Intellectual honesty
6. All the above three aspects of Novelty and
Originality may be encompassed in one phrase
as :
“Academic Integrity”
7. Integrity = Moral Principles
honesty, uprightness, righteousness, morality,
nobility, right-mindedness, noble-mindedness,
virtue, decency, fairness, sincerity, truthfulness,
trustworthiness
"I never doubt his integrity"
09-Aug-16 utpaldas@dibru.ac.in 7
8. Academic Integrity
UGC Regulation 2018 defines:
“Academic Integrity” is the intellectual honesty in
proposing, performing and reporting any activity,
which leads to the creation of intellectual
property.
9. Research Ethics
Ethics are the moral principles that govern a
person’s behaviour
Ethics are Code for conduct that distinguish
between right and wrong, and acceptable and
unacceptable behaviour
Research ethics may be referred to as doing what
is morally and legally right in research
10. Research ethics provides:
guidelines for the responsible conduct of research
educates scientists conducting research, and
monitors to ensure a high ethical standard
11. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), UK adheres
six key principles for ethical research are:
• research should aim to maximise benefit for individuals and
society and minimise risk and harm
• the rights and dignity of individuals and groups should be
respected
• participation should be voluntary and appropriately informed
• research should be conducted with integrity and
transparency
• lines of responsibility and accountability should be clearly
defined
• independence of research should be maintained and where
conflicts of interest cannot be avoided they should be made
open.
12. According to the Research Excellence Framework,
(2014)
• Researchers need to take care of various ethical
issues at different levels of research process
13. Ethical issues in research
Five most common but serious ethical issues
confronted in research are:
1. Research Design
2. Data source
3. Ethical approval & Informed Consent
4. Copyright/Intellectual Property Right
5. Plagiarism
14. Other common ethical issues
• Impartiality:
Strive to avoid bias in experimental design,
data analysis, data interpretation, peer review,
personnel decisions, grant writing, expert
testimony, and other aspects of research
• Confidentiality:
Protect confidential communications, such as
papers or grants submitted for publication,
personnel records, trade or military secrets,
and patient records
15. • Social Responsibility:
Strive to promote social good and prevent or
mitigate social harms or problems through
research, public education, and advocacy
• Non-Discrimination:
Avoid discrimination against colleagues or
students on the basis of sex, race, ethnicity, or
other factors that are not related to their
scientific competence and integrity
16. • Competence:
Maintain and improve your own professional
competence and expertise through lifelong education
and learning; take steps to promote competence in
science as a whole
• Legality:
Know and obey relevant laws and institutional
and governmental policies.
19. Plagiarism: Definition
Gipp, Bela (2014). Citation-based Plagiarism Detection: Detecting Disguised and Cross-language
Plagiarism using Citation Pattern Analysis. Springer Vieweg. ISBN 978-3-658-06393-1. p.10
Bela Gipp (2014) defined plagiarism as the following:
"The use of ideas, concepts, words, or structures
without appropriately acknowledging the source
to benefit in a setting where originality is expected
20. Contd…
The ‘Council of Writing Program Administrators’ of
Princeton University , in their Statement on Best Practices
(2012), describes plagiarism as:
‘the "deliberate" use of "someone else's language, ideas,
or other original (not common-knowledge) material
without acknowledging its source’
"Defining and Avoiding Plagiarism: The WPA Statement on Best Practices". Princeton University. 2012-07-
27
21. Contd…
As defined by the Brown University Writing Center,
Plagiarism is
‘Appropriating another person's ideas or words (spoken or
written) without attributing those word or ideas to their
true source…’
Source: https://library.brown.edu/libweb/plagiarism.php
22. Plagiarism: Forms
Different classifications of academic plagiarism forms
have been proposed by many scientists like:
John Walker (1998)
Mozgovoy et al (2010) (Maxim Mozgovoy, Tuomo Kakkonen, and Georgina Cosma)
Zakiy Firdaus Alfikri and Ayu Purwarianti (2014)
Debora Weber-Wulff (2014)
Velasquez et al (2016) (Juan D. Velásquez , Yerko Covacevich, Francisco Molina, Edison
Marrese-Taylor, Cristián Rodríguez, and Felipe Bravo-Marquez)
Hussain A. Chowdhury and D.K. Bhattacharyya (2016)
23. contd...
In 2015, Turnitin , made a survey of professors and
teachers both from HEI and Secondary Education
and based on feedback from 879 survey
respondents , identified 10 main forms of plagiarism
and ranked them according to frequency of
occurrences:
Source: “WHITE PAPER The Plagiarism Spectrum” Turnitin, retrieved on 26/05/2020
24. Contd…
1. CLONE:
An act of submitting another’s work, word-for-word, as one’s own.
2. CTRL-C:
A written piece that contains significant portions of text from a single source
without alterations.
3. FIND–REPLACE:
The act of changing key words and phrases but retaining the essential content
of the source in a paper.
4. REMIX:
An act of paraphrasing from other sources and making the content fit
together seamlessly.
5. RECYCLE:
The act of borrowing generously from one’s own previous work without
citation; To self plagiarize.
Source: “WHITE PAPER The Plagiarism Spectrum” Turnitin, retrieved on 26/05/2020
25. Contd…
6. HYBRID:
The act of combining perfectly cited sources with copied passages—
without citation—in one paper.
7. MASHUP:
A paper that represents a mix of copied material from several different
sources without proper citation.
8. 404 ERROR:
A written piece that includes citations to non-existent or inaccurate
information about sources
9. AGGREGATOR:
The “Aggregator” includes proper citation, but the paper contains almost
no original work.
10. RE-TWEET:
This paper includes proper citation, but relies too closely on the text’s
original wording and/or structure.
Source: “WHITE PAPER The Plagiarism Spectrum” Turnitin, retrieved on 26/05/2020
26. A systematic literature review by Tomas et.
el. in 2019 deductively derived a typology of
academic plagiarism extending the classic
three-layered language model (lexis, syntax,
and semantics) to four layers (ideas &
structures) and categorized plagiarism forms
according to the layer of the model they affect
as the following:
Foltýnek, Tomáš; Meuschke, Norman; Gipp, Bela (2019-10-16). "Academic Plagiarism Detection: A
Systematic Literature Review". ACM Computing Surveys. 52 (6): 1–42. doi:10.1145/3345317
27. Contd...
1. Characters-preserving plagiarism
• Literal plagiarism (copy and paste i.e. Verbatim copying)
• Possibly with mentioning the source
2. Syntax-preserving plagiarism
• Technical disguise (e.g. using identically looking glyphs from
another alphabet)
• Synonym substitution
3. Semantics-preserving plagiarism
• Translation
• Paraphrase (mosaic, clause quilts, restatement, additional
manner of expression)
Foltýnek, Tomáš; Meuschke, Norman; Gipp, Bela (2019-10-16). "Academic Plagiarism Detection: A Systematic
Literature Review". ACM Computing Surveys. 52 (6): 1–42. doi:10.1145/3345317
28. Contd…
4. Idea-preserving plagiarism
• Structural plagiarism (Reusing text structure)
• Appropriation of concepts and ideas only
5. Ghost-writing
• Collusion (secret cooperation or deceitful
agreement in order to deceive others)
• Contract cheating ( to pay others to complete
their coursework)
Foltýnek, Tomáš; Meuschke, Norman; Gipp, Bela (2019-10-16). "Academic Plagiarism Detection: A Systematic
Literature Review". ACM Computing Surveys. 52 (6): 1–42. doi:10.1145/3345317
29. Besides above, the following are also categorised
as plagiarism:
• Failure to acknowledge assistance
• Use of materials written by professional agencies
• Repetitive research (repeating same idea)
• Replication (Duplication or Reproduction)
• Re-publication in translation without permission &
• acknowledgement
• Reverse plagiarism (refers to falsely giving authorship
credit over a work to a person who did not author
it, or falsely claiming a source)
09-Aug-16 utpaldas@dibru.ac.in 29
30. Why do people plagiarize?
• Study Pressure,
• Disorganization,
• Poor Study habits,
• Cut-and-Paste culture,
• English as the international language
• Lack of understanding of seriousness of plagiarism.
• Lack of strict Academic Discipline
• Careless attitude
• Lack of referencing skills
30
31. The Menace
The problem of academic plagiarism is not new but has been
present for centuries in the literary world.
The Latin word "plagiarius" (literally "kidnapper") was coined in
the 1st century, to denote stealing someone else's work . It was
pioneered by the Roman poet Marcus Valerius Martialis, who
complained that another poet had "kidnapped his verses“
The Latin word plagiārius, meaning "kidnapper“ and plagium,
meaning "kidnapping", is based on the Indo-European root -
plak, "to weave”
The word plagiarism was derived from here and introduced into
English around 1620 indicating its existence in 17 Century AD
32. Contd...
However, the rapid and continuous
advancement of information technology (IT),
which offers convenient and instant access to
vast amounts of information, has made
plagiarizing easier than ever.
At the same time, IT also facilitated the
detection of academic plagiarism in a faster
and convenient way.
33. Technology driven society
• The massive ongoing explosion of information
• Impact of Social Media
• Growing impact of technology
• Increasing complexity and volatility due cross
disciplinary research.
• increasingly questioning the value of the research in
universities and also the economy and of graduate
employability
09-Aug-16 utpaldas@dibru.ac.in 33
34. Contd…
Plagiarism in HEI:
For the first time in the year 2000, the higher educational
institutions in UK started deeper investigation into
problems of plagiarism.
Scientists like, Carroll & Appleton (2001) Bretag (2005) ,
Joyce (2008), East (2009), highlighted holistic approach
towards plagiarism prevention and claimed that it is
impossible to reduce the extent of plagiarism in higher
educational institutions, applying separate or isolated
measures.
35. How to avoid Academic Plagiarism
Scientists believe that avoiding the menace of
academic plagiarism needs a holistic approach,
may be divided in to three ways:
1. National approach
2. Institutional approach
3. Individual approach
36. 1. National Approach:
Sarlauskiene (2012) summarised results of research policies
that could be suggested following groups of plagiarism
prevention measures at national level:
• It is recommended in all countries and institutions to use
holistic approach for plagiarism prevention;
• Universities and other institutions of higher education are
initiating preparation of plagiarism prevention policy
more often and easier, if are conducted research surveys and
(or) are established responsible offices on national
level;
• Plagiarism prevention policies and measures at universities
have be prepared and implemented systematically,
pursuing management of institutional changes;
37. • Measures for plagiarism prevention and procedures of
implementation these measures have meet legal
• Each institution can and have follow regulations approved
by the state authorities and examples of good practice
published in scientific literature, however, institutional
plagiarism prevention policies have be prepared taking
into account experience of a certain institution, existing
academic culture, procedures and peculiarities of study
process. Otherwise suggested regulations could be not
understandable for academic society and procedures
would not be implemented.
39. 09-Aug-16 utpaldas@dibru.ac.in 39
UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION
NOTIFICATION
UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION (PROMOTION OF
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PREVENTION
OF PLAGIARISM IN HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS)
REGULATIONS, 2018
New Delhi, the 23rd July, 2018
40. 2. Institutional approach:
Gibson et al. (2006) proposed practical measures for
plagiarism prevention in institutions:
• Combat ignorance (faculty members should help
students to select proper sources);
• Sharing responsibility (the procedure should be
provided at the faculty so, that students could present
their works in parts and lecturers could to check them
and to provide remarks);
41. Contd…
• Prevention of bought works (all lecturers have to
know how many possibilities students have to buy
works and to give students actual topics and ask to
show the sources analysed);
• Changes in academic environment and culture
(requirements have be determined, accepted and
followed, students have be informed about academic
integrity);
• Creation of barriers for plagiarism (for instance,
using measures for plagiarism detection).
42. 3. Individual approach
The case analysis done at Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-
Yvelines University (UVSQ), Paris by Annane & Annane
(2012) reveals six principles to follow be each student to
avoid plagiarism.
A student has to commit that: he or she not to:
• he or she not to copy books and other parts of the
sources, but use only small parts quoting them and
indicating the source;
• he or she not to illustrate works with pictures, figures
and diagrams without referencing their original source;
43. • he or she not to present other authors ideas without
referencing their authorship;
• he or she not to present texts translated by other
authors without referencing their authorship;
• he or she not to use works of other people even in
case of having their permission or agreement on co-
authorship if co authorship is not indicated in the
document;
• he or she not to appropriate the part or entire
work prepared by another person.
44. Important terminologies related to Plagiarism:
Author/Writers and the researchers need to understand
the intricacies of the following terminologies before writing
a research output:
1. Attribution
2. Citation
3. Copyright
4. Quote/Quotation Mark
5. Public Domain
6. Fair Use
7. Common Knowledge09-Aug-16 44
utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
45. 1. What is Attribution ?
Attribution is an act of providing acknowledgement to
the source from where some ideas have been borrowed.
For example:
Barrow, in his book "The Manufacture and Testing of
Durable Book Papers,” demonstrated that it was possible
to treat newly manufactured papers with solutions of
magnesium and calcium bicarbonates, thus neutralizing
acidity and prolonging the life of such papers materially.
09-Aug-16 45utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
46. 2. What is Citation?
A “citation” is a piece of detail and complete
information which describes the source(s) from
where certain materials / ideas have been borrowed
or analysed. It must enable the readers to find out
the source(s) again. A citation includes:
• information about the author(s)
• the title of the work
• the name and location of the company
that published the copy of the source
• the date the copy was published
• the page numbers of the material that have
borrowed/analysed
09-Aug-16 46utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
47. Example of Citation:
1. Gelbrich, J., Mai, C., &Militz, H. (2008). Chemical
changes in wood degraded by bacteria. International
Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 61(1), 24-32.
2. Agrawal, O. P., & Barkeshi, M. (1997). Conservation of
books, manuscripts and paper documents. Lucknow,
India: INTACH Indian Council of Conservation Institute.
(There are many citation styles: APA, MLA, Chicago,
Turabian, IEEE, etc; author may choose any one style
according to the need and convenience)
09-Aug-16 47utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
48. When does a writer need to cite?
The following situations always require citation:
• Whenever a writer uses quotes
• Whenever a writer paraphrases
• Whenever a writer uses ideas that someone
else has already expressed
• Whenever a writer makes a specific reference
to the work of another
• Whenever someone else’s work has been
critical in developing writer’s own ideas
09-Aug-16 48utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
49. 3. What is Copyright?
Copyright is a law that protects the intellectual
property created by an individual. It provides the
individual exclusive legal rights over distribution
and reproduction of that property. Intellectual
property of an individual may include music,
images, written words, text, video, and a variety of
other media.
Without written permission of the owner,
reproducing someone else’s ideas or information is
considered illegal as per copyright law.
.
09-Aug-16 49utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
51. Is copyright violation is legal offence?
Improper use of copyrighted material, such as, copying
without permission, alteration of the original text, not
providing acknowledgement or citation, substantial
similarity to the original, etc. are severe violation of
the Copyright Act and considered as legal offence
which may invite prosecution in the court of law.
09-Aug-16 51utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
52. Can facts be copyrighted?
When “facts” are result of some individual
research then it is considered as intellectual
property of the researcher and thus absolutely
copyrighted
09-Aug-16 52utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
53. Are all published works copyrighted?
All published works may not be copyrighted. One can
borrow from the following domain without fear of
plagiarism:
• Compilations of readily available information, such as
the phone book, yearbook, atlas, etc.
• Works published by the government, such as
Economic Survey, Census of India, etc.
• Facts that are not the result of original research of an
individual (such as, there are 29 states & 7 union
territories in India, or Hemoglobin contains 4 iron
molecules)
• Works in the “public domain”.
In all the above cases one need to cite properly.09-Aug-16 53utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
54. 4. USING QUOTE- HOW MUCH
A quote is a word, sentence, or sentences that a
writer copies exactly from a source
• You may use 3-4 words without citing a source. if you
use five or more words from a sentence, you should
quote and cite it.
• A quote is enclosed in quotation marks (for quotes
up to 39 words).
• For quotes of 40 or more words, it stands alone
without quotation marks and is indented five (5)
spaces from the left margin.
09-Aug-16 utpaldas@dibru.ac.in 54
55. SINGLE VS DOUBLE QUOTATION MARKS
• You should use double quotation marks when you quote
material from a source. If you are also quoting passages
from that source that were quoted in the original
source, use single quotation marks to indicate that the
original source contained the quotation.
• http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k70847&tabgroupid=icb.tabgroup108986
09-Aug-16 utpaldas@dibru.ac.in 55
56. 5. What is Public Domain?
All works that are no longer protected by copyright,
or never under any copyright act, are considered as
“public domain.”
One may freely make use material from these works
without fear of plagiarism, provided he or she
provides proper attributions of it.
09-Aug-16 56utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
57. How do I know if something is public
domain or not?
In general, anything published more than 75
years ago is now in the public domain.
Works published after 1978 are protected for
the lifetime of the author plus 60 years.
09-Aug-16 57utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
58. 6. What is “fair use”?
Fair use is a doctrine in the law of the United States that
permits limited use of copyrighted material without having to
first acquire permission from the copyright holder.
The “fair use policy” acts as guideline to decide whether the
use of a source is acceptable or contravene copyright laws.
Below some are viewpoints that determine the fairness of any
given usage
The nature of use
The amount used
The effect of used material on the original
09-Aug-16 58utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
59. The nature of use
If an author has merely copied something from
an original source, it is unlikely to be
considered ‘fair use’. But if the original source
has been transformed through interpretation,
analysis, modification, etc. and presented as
an original output, it is more likely to be
considered as ‘fair use.’
09-Aug-16 59utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
60. The amount used
If the amount of borrowing from an original
source is less then it is less likely it is to be
considered fair use. The more you borrow, the
more it is likely to be considered as fair use.
09-Aug-16 60utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
61. The effect of used material on the original
If an author has substantially borrowed from an
original source and created a work that competes
with the original source in the market which may
do the original author economic harm, is likely to
be considered fair use.
It is always better to have difference in objective of
the work or its target audience from that of the
original work to avoid possibilities of ‘fair use’.
09-Aug-16 61utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
62. 7. WHAT IS “COMMON KNOWLEDGE”?
• A well-known fact
• Information that is likely to appear in numerous
sources and to be familiar to large numbers of
people
• This is the only time you do not need to cite
information, provided that you do not copy that
information word-for-word from a source
• If you are not sure if the information you want to use
meets these definitions, cite it
• If at least 10 peer-review papers in your discipline
don’t give a citation for the information, then you
don’t need to
09-Aug-16 utpaldas@dibru.ac.in 62
63. EXAMPLES OF COMMON KNOWLEDGE
• Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated on April 4,
1968
• East Carolina University is located in Greenville, NC
and is part of the UNC system
• Smoking can cause respiratory diseases such as
emphysema and cancer
09-Aug-16 utpaldas@dibru.ac.in 63
64. What may be Excluded from Plagiarism check?
The following may be excluded at the time of
performing the plagiarism check:
A. Quotes
B. Bibliography
C. Phrases
D. Small matches upto 14 words
E. Mathematical Formula/Scientific Laws
F. Name of Institutions, Departments etc.
G. Small similarity less than 1%
09-Aug-16 64utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
65. As Per UGC Regulation 2018, the similarity checks for
plagiarism shall exclude the following:
i. All quoted work reproduced with all necessary
permission and/or attribution.
ii. All references, bibliography, table of content, preface
and acknowledgements.
iii. All generic terms, laws, standard symbols and
standards equations.
09-Aug-16 utpaldas@dibru.ac.in 65
66. The UGC Regulation 2018 also states that
• The research work carried out by the student, faculty,
researcher and staff shall be based on original ideas,
which shall include abstract, summary, hypothesis,
observations, results, conclusions and
recommendations only and shall not have any
similarities.
• It shall exclude a common knowledge or coincidental
terms, up to fourteen (14) consecutive words
09-Aug-16 utpaldas@dibru.ac.in 66
67. Whether plagiarism invites penalty?
a. Penalties for independent researcher:
Violation of Copyright Act by independent
researcher or author through plagiarism is
considered as legal offence which may attract
prosecution in the court of law leading to several
kinds of penalties depending on the severity of
crime
09-Aug-16 67utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
68. b. Penalties for student/research scholar
An academic institute may consider following
penalties for student depending on the severity of
crime as it deems fit:
i. Written apology
ii. Rewriting or alternate piece of work
iii. Deduction of marks (Partial or Full)
iv. Imposing Fine
v. Restriction in publication of thesis or any chapter
as article
vi. Withdrawal of degree
vii. Rustication, temporarily or permanently for
further higher education
09-Aug-16 68utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
69. c. Penalties for academician
An academic institute may consider following penalties
for academician depending on the severity of crime as
it deems fit:
i. Disgrace to both Individual and institution
ii. May face disciplinary action as per institute rules
iii. It can cost a person his or her professional credibility
or even a job
iv. Debarment from eligibility to receive research funds
for grants and contracts from any government
agency in India
09-Aug-16 69utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
70. UGC Regulation 2018 defines
Levels of Plagiarism
Plagiarism would be quantified into following levels in
ascending order of severity for the purpose of its
definition:
i. Level 0: Similarities upto 10% - Minor similarities, no
penalty
ii. Level 1: Similarities above 10% to 40%
iii. Level 2: Similarities above 40% to 60%
iv. Level 3: Similarities above 60%
09-Aug-16 utpaldas@dibru.ac.in 70
71. Acknowledgement
Thanks to the
authors of
various sources
from where
references have
been cited in this
presentation
In spite of all-
round efforts
to cite the
references,
any omission
is duly
regretted
This presentation is
only a part of
awareness
campaign by this
author against
plagiarism & its
growing menace in
the academic
research, so
suggestions are
welcome to make
this presentation
more effective
09-Aug-16 71utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
72. References• http://www.turnitin.com/guidelines_staff_students_plagarism.pdf
• Zhang, Y.H. Helen (2016). Against Plagiarism: A Guide for Editors and Authors. Springer
pp.162 (Google Books – Copy)
• http://www.jnu.ac.in/Guidelines for Plagiarism Check Delhi University.pdf
• Guidelines to check Plagiarism by Jagnnaath University - Copy.pdf
• Plagiarism_Policy_Pune University_14-5-12.pdf
• http://www.ugc.ac.in/UGC Ph.D regulation on minimum standards and procedure for the
award of M.Phil. PhD Degree regulation 2009 And clarification on guidelines for admission
in M. Phil. Phd clarification.pdf
• Self-Plagiarism or Fair Use? Communication of the ACM August1994/Vol.37. No.8.pdf
• WWW.ITHENTICATE.COM/ 06122014ithenticate-pressure-to-publish.pdf
• WWW.ITHENTICATE.COM/ 06122014ithenticate-selfplagiarism.pdf
• Mater Sociomed. 2014 Apr; 26(2): 141-146/Plagiarism in Scientific Research and
Publications and How to Prevent It/DOI: 10.5455/msm.2014.26.141-146
• http://static.urkund.com/manuals/URKUND_Plagiarism_Handbook_EN.pdf
• http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/moredetails/UGC_Guidelines_for_Shodhganga.pdf.
• http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/faking-it-3/#sthash.8Frj7Upk.dpuf
• Shodhganga and Deterring Plagiarism in Research Outputs.pdf @ Manoj Kumar K.
• Researchgate.com
• Anti Plagiarism_PPT.pdf @ Suboohi Siddiqui09-Aug-16 72utpaldas@dibru.ac.in
73. • https://library.brown.edu/libweb/plagiarism.php
• Gipp, Bela (2014). Citation-based Plagiarism Detection: Detecting Disguised and Cross-
language Plagiarism using Citation Pattern Analysis. Springer Vieweg. ISBN 978-3-658-
06393-1. p.10
• "Defining and Avoiding Plagiarism: The WPA Statement on Best Practices". Princeton
University. 2012-07-27
• Foltýnek, Tomáš; Meuschke, Norman; Gipp, Bela (2019-10-16). "Academic Plagiarism
Detection: A Systematic Literature Review". ACM Computing Surveys. 52 (6): 1–
42. doi:10.1145/3345317
• https://library.brown.edu/libweb/plagiarism.php
• “WHITE PAPER The Plagiarism Spectrum” Turnitin, retrieved on 26/05/2020
• http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k70847&tabgroupid=icb.tabgroup108986