BIOASSAY
By :Dr. Sumit Kumar Mahato
Junior Resident( Academic)
Guide: Dr. Uma Shanker Pd. Keshri
Associate Professor
Department of Pharmacology
RIMS, Ranchi
 An assay is an investigative (analytic) procedure
in laboratory medicine, pharmacology,
environmental biology, and molecular
biology for qualitatively assessing or
quantitatively measuring the presence or
amount or the functional activity of a target
entity (the analyte) which can be
a drug or biochemical substance or
organic sample
 Chemical Assay
 Immunoassay
 Bioassay
Chemical Assay:
It is the study of the separation, identification,
and quantification of the chemical components of natural and
artificial materials.
Immunoassay:
A technique that makes use of the binding between an antigen
and its homologous antibody in order to identify and quantify the
specific antigen or antibody in a sample.
 Comparative assessment of relative potency of a test compound to a
standard compound on a living or biological tissue.
 Quantitative measurement of the amount of active principle or substance in
a pharmaceutical preparation or biological material using a suitable
biological system
Introduced by Paul Ehrlich - biostandardization of Diphtheria antitoxin
5
Bioassay
Bioassay
Chemical Assay
 Less Precise
 More time consuming
 More expensive
 Active constituent &
structure not known.
 More sensitive
 More men power
Required
 Difficult to handle
 More Precise
 Less time consuming
 Less expensive
 Active constituent &
structure fully
established.
 Less sensitive
 Less men power
required
 Easy to handle
7
Biological
assay
Bio
metrics
Biological
standadizatio
n
Bio-
standadizati
on
To compare the test substance with the
International Standard preparation of the same
To find out how much test substance is
required to produce the same biological effect,
as produced by the standard
Activity assayed should be the activity of
interest
8
Standard & test sample - similar pharmacological
effects & mode of action
Both should be compared for their established
pharmacological effect using specified technique
Ex: *Ach – contractile response on frog rectus
abdominis muscle
*Histamine – contractile response on guinea
pig ileum
9
 Problem of biological variation must be
minimized
 Experimental conditions - kept constant
 Animals - same species, sex and weight
 Number of animals - large enough to
minimize error (individual variation)
 Isolated preparations - sensitive
10
 No chemical method has been developed
 Chemical assay is too complex /not sensitive enough to
measure (ex: insulin, Ach)
 To measure the pharmacological activity of new or
chemically undefined substances
 For biological standardization of drugs obtained from
natural sources as these cannot be obtained in pure form.
Eg:
Oxytocin,Vasopressin,Insulin,Heparin..
11
 To compare the strength of a drug obtained
from various sources due to different
compositions
 Chemicals with similar structure, but different
biological activity
 Chemical structure of the active principle is
unknown
 Chemical structure known; cannot be actively
purified. Eg: Peptide hormones
12
 Sensitivity
 Specificity
 Repeatability
 Reproducibility
 Precision
 Accuracy
 Stability – tissue has to stay “bioassay-
fit
13
14
•Intact
animals
Invivo
•Isolated
tissuesInvitro
WHOLE ANIMALS
 Nor Adrenaline – Cat
 Cardiac Glycosides – Guinea Pig
 Insulin – Mice
 Estrogens – Ovariectamised Female Rat
ISOLATED TISSUE
 Acetyl Choline – Frog Rectus Abdominus muscle
 Histamine – Guinea Pig ileum
 Adrenaline – Rat uterus
 Oxytocin – Rat uterus oestrogen primed
15
Qualitative bioassay
Is used for assessing the physical effects of a substance that
may not be quantified, such as abnormal development or
deformity.
Eg: Arnold Adolph Berthold's famous experiment on castrated
chickens. This analysis found that by removing the testes of a
chicken, it would not develop into a rooster because the
endocrine signals necessary for this process were not available.
Quantitative bioassays
involve estimation of concentration/potency of a substance by
measurement of the biological response it produces. These
bioassays are typically analyzed using the methods of
biostatistics
1.Direct end point assay (DEPA)
2.Quantal assay (all or none assay)
3.Graded assay :
a) Bracketting assay
b) Matching assay
c) Interpolation assay
d) Multiple point assay ( 3-point, 4point, 6-
point, 8-point).
Principle: is to measure direct response of dose of standard and
test preparation. The threshold dose required for response is
determined for each experimental unit.
Ratio between these doses estimates the potency of the test
preparation relative to the standard.
Concentration of test= TDS/TDT×CSD
Where, TDS= Threshold dose of standard
TDT= Threshold dose of test
CSD= Concentration of standard drug
Threshold dose of standard = Total period of infusion × rate
of drug administration
Advantage:
 Drug effects appear rapidly and are easily recognised
 Drug effect is directly proportional to drug dose
 Rapid end-point detection.
Disadvantages:
 Only toxicity study or high dose study is possible
 Dose ranging study cannot be done
 Quantal response – the unknown is compared with the standard with
respect to potency which produces the quantal affect, i.e change is easily
recognised sign or often death.
 In a quantal assay there is use of dose response relationship.
 quantal response to a drug is obtained and percentage of positive
response at each dose is calculated.
 The response in quantal assay is varying, i.e some responses are
irreversible and hence animal used is once and some responses have no
permanent effect and animal can be used in next experiment
 e.g –
 Determination of LD50
 Hypoglycemic convulsion in mice in the assay of insulin
20
 Graded response - In these assays, as the dose
increases there is an equivalent rise in response.
The potency of a test agonist is determined by
comparing its mean response to standard mean
response.
 This process is also known as “analytical dilution
assay”
 GRA is the simplest way of determining potency of a
test drug because it does not require statistical
analysis
21
22
standard
Test/unknow
n
23
DRC & Log DRC
30%
70%
Sigmoid curve
Wide range of doses
can plot
 Rectangular hyperbola
• Potency
• Efficacy
• Slope of curve
24
 Used when test sample is too small.
 Comparison of potency between unknown and standard drug is done
by trial and error method.
 Response is matched at only one dose
 Does not need dose respone curve of test compound
 It require most sensitive tissue
 Concentration of test= (Dose of standard/ Dose of test)× conc. Of standard
 Disadvantage:
 Experimental error is not excluded out
 There is no sign of parallelism as it lack dose response relationship.
 Used when test sample is too small.
 Single or few responses is taken by using any test drug
concentration.
 This response is bracketed between two responses one
higher and one lower of the standard drug.
 The strength of the unknown can be found by simple
interpolation of this bracketted response on dose axis
28
 less accurate,time consuming, troublesome
 cannot get exact match of response
 quantitative difference b/w test & standard not
obtained
30
standard
Test/unknow
n
 A log dose-response curve is plotted with the standard,
 Single or few responses of test drug are plotted.
 The dose of test drug which comes at the linear log dose-
response is interpolated from the dose respone plot
31
100
50
0 x x1
standard%
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
E
LOG DOSE
 Sensitivity of tissue is 1st determined by prior
plotting of a conc-response curve with known
agonist
 Dose can be plotted even if it varies over
thousand fold range
 Error is normally distributed
 Sensitivity of tissue changes with time
 Timing of doses not taken into account
 Variation in mode of application of drugs
 Responses are repeated several times and the
mean of each is taken
 Chances of error are minimized
 3 point method - 2 doses of std+1 dose of test
 4 point method - 2 doses of std+2 doses of test
 6 point method - 3 doses of std+3 doses of test
 Latin square method of randomization to avoid
any bias
35
36
t s1 s2
s1 s2 t
s2 t s1
3
cycles
37
%
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
E
LOG DOSE
s1
T
t
S2
s2
S1
s1 s2 t
t s1 s2
s2 s1 t
t s2 s1
• Mean responses of these 3 sets plotted
• Log potency ratio (M) =
(T-S1÷ S2-S1)× log d
where, d – dose ratio = s2/s1
• Strength of unknown = s1/t × antilog of M
S1, S2- length of standard dose response selected between
25-75%
T-length of test dose response selected in between of
two standard responses
s2/s1 -standard drug dose which came in contact with tissueand
given the response S1, S2. respectively
t = Test drug dose which came in contact with tissu and given the
response T
39
41
4 - POINT ASSAY
42
%
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
E
LOG DOSE
s1
T1
t1
S2
s2
S1
T2
t2
s2 t1 t2 s1
t1 t2 s1 s2
t2 s1 s2 t1
s1 s2 t1 t2
• Mean responses of 4 sets plotted
• Log potency ratio (M)
(T2-S2)+(T1-S1) × Log d
(S2-S1)+(T2-T1)
where, d-dose ratio = s2/s1
• Strength of unknown =
s1/t1 × antilog of M
44
 3+3 dose assay
 3 conc each of std & test drug are used
 6 sets of experiments using 6 doses in each
set
 More time consuming,lesser in use
 Reliability is excellent
 to measure the pharmacological activity of new/
chemically undefined substances
 to investigate the function of endogenous
mediators
 to measure drug toxicity and unwanted effects
 to measure the conc of drugs and other active
substances in the blood or other body fluids
47
 Determination of potency, ED50/LD50 of
drugs
 New drug development
 Measure clinical effectiveness
48
• Biological variation
• Troublesome
• Time consuming
• Expensive
• Less accurate than physico-chemical
methods
49
 Successful tool in estimation & discovery of
biologically active substances
 Sensitivity & Specificity – important tool in
pharmacology
Bioassay ppt by dr sumit

Bioassay ppt by dr sumit

  • 1.
    BIOASSAY By :Dr. SumitKumar Mahato Junior Resident( Academic) Guide: Dr. Uma Shanker Pd. Keshri Associate Professor Department of Pharmacology RIMS, Ranchi
  • 2.
     An assayis an investigative (analytic) procedure in laboratory medicine, pharmacology, environmental biology, and molecular biology for qualitatively assessing or quantitatively measuring the presence or amount or the functional activity of a target entity (the analyte) which can be a drug or biochemical substance or organic sample
  • 3.
     Chemical Assay Immunoassay  Bioassay
  • 4.
    Chemical Assay: It isthe study of the separation, identification, and quantification of the chemical components of natural and artificial materials. Immunoassay: A technique that makes use of the binding between an antigen and its homologous antibody in order to identify and quantify the specific antigen or antibody in a sample.
  • 5.
     Comparative assessmentof relative potency of a test compound to a standard compound on a living or biological tissue.  Quantitative measurement of the amount of active principle or substance in a pharmaceutical preparation or biological material using a suitable biological system Introduced by Paul Ehrlich - biostandardization of Diphtheria antitoxin 5
  • 6.
    Bioassay Bioassay Chemical Assay  LessPrecise  More time consuming  More expensive  Active constituent & structure not known.  More sensitive  More men power Required  Difficult to handle  More Precise  Less time consuming  Less expensive  Active constituent & structure fully established.  Less sensitive  Less men power required  Easy to handle
  • 7.
  • 8.
    To compare thetest substance with the International Standard preparation of the same To find out how much test substance is required to produce the same biological effect, as produced by the standard Activity assayed should be the activity of interest 8
  • 9.
    Standard & testsample - similar pharmacological effects & mode of action Both should be compared for their established pharmacological effect using specified technique Ex: *Ach – contractile response on frog rectus abdominis muscle *Histamine – contractile response on guinea pig ileum 9
  • 10.
     Problem ofbiological variation must be minimized  Experimental conditions - kept constant  Animals - same species, sex and weight  Number of animals - large enough to minimize error (individual variation)  Isolated preparations - sensitive 10
  • 11.
     No chemicalmethod has been developed  Chemical assay is too complex /not sensitive enough to measure (ex: insulin, Ach)  To measure the pharmacological activity of new or chemically undefined substances  For biological standardization of drugs obtained from natural sources as these cannot be obtained in pure form. Eg: Oxytocin,Vasopressin,Insulin,Heparin.. 11
  • 12.
     To comparethe strength of a drug obtained from various sources due to different compositions  Chemicals with similar structure, but different biological activity  Chemical structure of the active principle is unknown  Chemical structure known; cannot be actively purified. Eg: Peptide hormones 12
  • 13.
     Sensitivity  Specificity Repeatability  Reproducibility  Precision  Accuracy  Stability – tissue has to stay “bioassay- fit 13
  • 14.
  • 15.
    WHOLE ANIMALS  NorAdrenaline – Cat  Cardiac Glycosides – Guinea Pig  Insulin – Mice  Estrogens – Ovariectamised Female Rat ISOLATED TISSUE  Acetyl Choline – Frog Rectus Abdominus muscle  Histamine – Guinea Pig ileum  Adrenaline – Rat uterus  Oxytocin – Rat uterus oestrogen primed 15
  • 16.
    Qualitative bioassay Is usedfor assessing the physical effects of a substance that may not be quantified, such as abnormal development or deformity. Eg: Arnold Adolph Berthold's famous experiment on castrated chickens. This analysis found that by removing the testes of a chicken, it would not develop into a rooster because the endocrine signals necessary for this process were not available. Quantitative bioassays involve estimation of concentration/potency of a substance by measurement of the biological response it produces. These bioassays are typically analyzed using the methods of biostatistics
  • 17.
    1.Direct end pointassay (DEPA) 2.Quantal assay (all or none assay) 3.Graded assay : a) Bracketting assay b) Matching assay c) Interpolation assay d) Multiple point assay ( 3-point, 4point, 6- point, 8-point).
  • 18.
    Principle: is tomeasure direct response of dose of standard and test preparation. The threshold dose required for response is determined for each experimental unit. Ratio between these doses estimates the potency of the test preparation relative to the standard. Concentration of test= TDS/TDT×CSD Where, TDS= Threshold dose of standard TDT= Threshold dose of test CSD= Concentration of standard drug Threshold dose of standard = Total period of infusion × rate of drug administration
  • 19.
    Advantage:  Drug effectsappear rapidly and are easily recognised  Drug effect is directly proportional to drug dose  Rapid end-point detection. Disadvantages:  Only toxicity study or high dose study is possible  Dose ranging study cannot be done
  • 20.
     Quantal response– the unknown is compared with the standard with respect to potency which produces the quantal affect, i.e change is easily recognised sign or often death.  In a quantal assay there is use of dose response relationship.  quantal response to a drug is obtained and percentage of positive response at each dose is calculated.  The response in quantal assay is varying, i.e some responses are irreversible and hence animal used is once and some responses have no permanent effect and animal can be used in next experiment  e.g –  Determination of LD50  Hypoglycemic convulsion in mice in the assay of insulin 20
  • 21.
     Graded response- In these assays, as the dose increases there is an equivalent rise in response. The potency of a test agonist is determined by comparing its mean response to standard mean response.  This process is also known as “analytical dilution assay”  GRA is the simplest way of determining potency of a test drug because it does not require statistical analysis 21
  • 22.
  • 23.
    23 DRC & LogDRC 30% 70% Sigmoid curve Wide range of doses can plot  Rectangular hyperbola • Potency • Efficacy • Slope of curve
  • 24.
  • 25.
     Used whentest sample is too small.  Comparison of potency between unknown and standard drug is done by trial and error method.  Response is matched at only one dose  Does not need dose respone curve of test compound  It require most sensitive tissue  Concentration of test= (Dose of standard/ Dose of test)× conc. Of standard  Disadvantage:  Experimental error is not excluded out  There is no sign of parallelism as it lack dose response relationship.
  • 26.
     Used whentest sample is too small.  Single or few responses is taken by using any test drug concentration.  This response is bracketed between two responses one higher and one lower of the standard drug.  The strength of the unknown can be found by simple interpolation of this bracketted response on dose axis
  • 28.
  • 29.
     less accurate,timeconsuming, troublesome  cannot get exact match of response  quantitative difference b/w test & standard not obtained
  • 30.
  • 31.
     A logdose-response curve is plotted with the standard,  Single or few responses of test drug are plotted.  The dose of test drug which comes at the linear log dose- response is interpolated from the dose respone plot 31
  • 32.
  • 33.
     Sensitivity oftissue is 1st determined by prior plotting of a conc-response curve with known agonist  Dose can be plotted even if it varies over thousand fold range  Error is normally distributed
  • 34.
     Sensitivity oftissue changes with time  Timing of doses not taken into account  Variation in mode of application of drugs
  • 35.
     Responses arerepeated several times and the mean of each is taken  Chances of error are minimized  3 point method - 2 doses of std+1 dose of test  4 point method - 2 doses of std+2 doses of test  6 point method - 3 doses of std+3 doses of test  Latin square method of randomization to avoid any bias 35
  • 36.
    36 t s1 s2 s1s2 t s2 t s1 3 cycles
  • 37.
  • 38.
    s1 s2 t ts1 s2 s2 s1 t t s2 s1
  • 39.
    • Mean responsesof these 3 sets plotted • Log potency ratio (M) = (T-S1÷ S2-S1)× log d where, d – dose ratio = s2/s1 • Strength of unknown = s1/t × antilog of M S1, S2- length of standard dose response selected between 25-75% T-length of test dose response selected in between of two standard responses s2/s1 -standard drug dose which came in contact with tissueand given the response S1, S2. respectively t = Test drug dose which came in contact with tissu and given the response T 39
  • 41.
  • 42.
  • 43.
    s2 t1 t2s1 t1 t2 s1 s2 t2 s1 s2 t1 s1 s2 t1 t2
  • 44.
    • Mean responsesof 4 sets plotted • Log potency ratio (M) (T2-S2)+(T1-S1) × Log d (S2-S1)+(T2-T1) where, d-dose ratio = s2/s1 • Strength of unknown = s1/t1 × antilog of M 44
  • 46.
     3+3 doseassay  3 conc each of std & test drug are used  6 sets of experiments using 6 doses in each set  More time consuming,lesser in use  Reliability is excellent
  • 47.
     to measurethe pharmacological activity of new/ chemically undefined substances  to investigate the function of endogenous mediators  to measure drug toxicity and unwanted effects  to measure the conc of drugs and other active substances in the blood or other body fluids 47
  • 48.
     Determination ofpotency, ED50/LD50 of drugs  New drug development  Measure clinical effectiveness 48
  • 49.
    • Biological variation •Troublesome • Time consuming • Expensive • Less accurate than physico-chemical methods 49
  • 50.
     Successful toolin estimation & discovery of biologically active substances  Sensitivity & Specificity – important tool in pharmacology

Editor's Notes

  • #9 The standards are internationally accepted samples of drugs maintained and recommended by the Expert Committee of the Biological Standardization of W.H.O. In India, standard drugs are maintained in Government institutions like Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, Central Drug Laboratory, Calcutta, etc
  • #14 Repeatability: Same observation using same instruments and operators, and over short time periods Reproducibility: Same observation using different instruments and operators, and over longer time periods
  • #16 Estrogens – Ovariectamised Female Rat / vaginal cornification
  • #24 Initial portion of curve is so steep that it is impossible to guage the magnitude of response corresponding to small increase in dose When the response reaches max, large increase in dose required to produce small change in response In arithmetic scale, it is difficult to display wide dose range
  • #49 Biological standardization – comparison & adjustment of strength of the sample with that of std under controlled conditions