This document provides an overview of the natural system of plant classification developed by George Bentham and Joseph Dalton Hooker in their book Genera Plantarum. It describes the key features of their system, including dividing plants into two major groups - cryptogams (non-flowering plants) and phanerogams (flowering plants). Flowering plants are further divided into dicotyledons, monocotyledons, and gymnosperms. The system places plant families into a hierarchical structure of orders, cohorts, and series based on morphological characteristics. While pioneering for its time, the system is not fully phylogenetic and has limitations such as not clearly addressing the origin of angiosperms.
Classification denotes the arrangement of a single plant or group of plants an distinct category following a system of nomenclature, and in accordance with a particular and well established plan.
* The members of this family are mainly distributed in the tropical parts of the world. The plants occur mostly in dry regions.
* Several shrubby species of Capparis occur in the Mediterranean region.
* Reference - Taxonomy of Angiosperms - Dr. B. P. Pandey
From its initiation in 1998, the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) has focused on the production of an ever-more stable system of classification of the flowering plants (angiosperms). Based largely on analyses of DNA sequence data, the system is compiled by a larger group of experts than any previous system and has the advantage of being testable, allowing for confidence levels in the system to be estimated for the first time.
Classification denotes the arrangement of a single plant or group of plants an distinct category following a system of nomenclature, and in accordance with a particular and well established plan.
* The members of this family are mainly distributed in the tropical parts of the world. The plants occur mostly in dry regions.
* Several shrubby species of Capparis occur in the Mediterranean region.
* Reference - Taxonomy of Angiosperms - Dr. B. P. Pandey
From its initiation in 1998, the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) has focused on the production of an ever-more stable system of classification of the flowering plants (angiosperms). Based largely on analyses of DNA sequence data, the system is compiled by a larger group of experts than any previous system and has the advantage of being testable, allowing for confidence levels in the system to be estimated for the first time.
Poaceae or Gramineae is a large and nearly ubiquitous family of monocotyledonous flowering plants known as grasses. It includes the cereal grasses, bamboos and the grasses of natural grassland and species cultivated in lawns and pasture. The latter are commonly referred to collectively as grass
Angiosperms are the flowering plants also known as Magnoliophyta. The botanical term "Angiosperm" meaning ‘bottle or vessel’ is derived from the ancient Greek. These are the most diverse group of land plants. Angiosperms are seed-producing plants and the distinguished features of angiosperms over gymnosperms are angiosperms bear flowers, endosperm within the seeds and the production of fruits that contain the seed. According to the botanists the flowering plants diversified and widespread 120 million years ago. The classification of the flowering plants also has a long history.
In the past, classification systems were typically produced by an individual botanist or by a small group resulting large number of systems. Different systems and their updates were generally favored in different countries. Bentham and Hooker’s system was popular in the Britain and the Engler’s system was famous in the Europe etc. These systems were introduced before the availability of genetic evidences and angiosperms were classified using their morphology and biochemistry. After the 1980’s genetic evidences were available and phylogenetic methods came into the classification procedures.
In the late 1990s, an informal group of researchers from major institutions worldwide came together and they established the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG). The objective was to provide a widely accepted and more stable point of reference for angiosperm classification. APG I was published in 1998 as their first attempt in Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. The initial 1998 paper by the APG made angiosperms the first large group of organisms to be systematically re-classified primarily on the basis of genetic characteristics. The group emphasized the need for a classification system for angiosperms at the level of families, orders and above. The existed systems are rejected is because they are not phylogenetically classified. The outline of a phylogenetic tree of all flowering plants became established and several well supported major clades involving many families of flowering plants were identified. The new knowledge of phylogeny revealed relationships in conflict with the then widely used modern classifications.
The principles of APG system are retaining the Linnean system of orders and families, Use of monophyletic groups (Consist of all descendants of a common ancestor), taking a broad approach to defining the limits of groups such as orders and families and use of term ‘clades’ above or parallel to the level of orders and families. A major outcome of the classification is the disappearance of the traditional division of the flowering plants into two groups, which are monocots and dicots.
Even though there are several controversies about APG the botanists worldwide are influenced by the concept and are currently practice the system.
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification
APG I
APG II
APG III
APG IV
Molecular Based system
features and organization
Merits and demerits
Difference in APG system.
Arrangement of plants in an orderly sequence based upon their similarities and relationship in hierarchy such as species, genus, family, order, class and division in conformity with the nomenclatural system
The closely related plants are kept within a group and unrelated plants are kept far apart in separate groups.
Poaceae or Gramineae is a large and nearly ubiquitous family of monocotyledonous flowering plants known as grasses. It includes the cereal grasses, bamboos and the grasses of natural grassland and species cultivated in lawns and pasture. The latter are commonly referred to collectively as grass
Angiosperms are the flowering plants also known as Magnoliophyta. The botanical term "Angiosperm" meaning ‘bottle or vessel’ is derived from the ancient Greek. These are the most diverse group of land plants. Angiosperms are seed-producing plants and the distinguished features of angiosperms over gymnosperms are angiosperms bear flowers, endosperm within the seeds and the production of fruits that contain the seed. According to the botanists the flowering plants diversified and widespread 120 million years ago. The classification of the flowering plants also has a long history.
In the past, classification systems were typically produced by an individual botanist or by a small group resulting large number of systems. Different systems and their updates were generally favored in different countries. Bentham and Hooker’s system was popular in the Britain and the Engler’s system was famous in the Europe etc. These systems were introduced before the availability of genetic evidences and angiosperms were classified using their morphology and biochemistry. After the 1980’s genetic evidences were available and phylogenetic methods came into the classification procedures.
In the late 1990s, an informal group of researchers from major institutions worldwide came together and they established the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG). The objective was to provide a widely accepted and more stable point of reference for angiosperm classification. APG I was published in 1998 as their first attempt in Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. The initial 1998 paper by the APG made angiosperms the first large group of organisms to be systematically re-classified primarily on the basis of genetic characteristics. The group emphasized the need for a classification system for angiosperms at the level of families, orders and above. The existed systems are rejected is because they are not phylogenetically classified. The outline of a phylogenetic tree of all flowering plants became established and several well supported major clades involving many families of flowering plants were identified. The new knowledge of phylogeny revealed relationships in conflict with the then widely used modern classifications.
The principles of APG system are retaining the Linnean system of orders and families, Use of monophyletic groups (Consist of all descendants of a common ancestor), taking a broad approach to defining the limits of groups such as orders and families and use of term ‘clades’ above or parallel to the level of orders and families. A major outcome of the classification is the disappearance of the traditional division of the flowering plants into two groups, which are monocots and dicots.
Even though there are several controversies about APG the botanists worldwide are influenced by the concept and are currently practice the system.
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification
APG I
APG II
APG III
APG IV
Molecular Based system
features and organization
Merits and demerits
Difference in APG system.
Arrangement of plants in an orderly sequence based upon their similarities and relationship in hierarchy such as species, genus, family, order, class and division in conformity with the nomenclatural system
The closely related plants are kept within a group and unrelated plants are kept far apart in separate groups.
This presentation has been intended to offer a bird's eye view about the phylogenetic classification of the plant kingdom in general and the Engler and Prantl system in particular with merits and demerits.
The Arum Family“
The diversity of Aroids”
Dr DON J SCOTT BERIN G BHMS(MD)
DEPARTMENT OF MATERIA MEDICA
WHITE MEMORIAL HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL
COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL VEEYANOOR, ATTOOR, K K DIST.
This PPT has been made to explore the plant classification in general and the classification as made by Bentham & Hooker for the classification of the flowering plants. It also offers the history of plant classification along with the merits and demerits of this aforesaid classification.
Amentiferae Order or taxon ?
अमेंटिफेरी क्यों खास है ? Phylogeny and characteristics.
Dr. Praveen Mohil
Assistant Professor
Department of Botany, university of Rajasthan
Centrospermae : Salient features, floral & families diversity, and phylogeny
Salient features of Centrospermae
Floral diversity in Centrospermae
Diversity of families in Centrospermae
Phylogeny of order Centrospermae
Dr. Praveen Mohil
Assistant Professor,
Department of Botany
University of Rajasthan
Jaipur.
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Sérgio Sacani
The ambient solar wind that flls the heliosphere originates from multiple
sources in the solar corona and is highly structured. It is often described
as high-speed, relatively homogeneous, plasma streams from coronal
holes and slow-speed, highly variable, streams whose source regions are
under debate. A key goal of ESA/NASA’s Solar Orbiter mission is to identify
solar wind sources and understand what drives the complexity seen in the
heliosphere. By combining magnetic feld modelling and spectroscopic
techniques with high-resolution observations and measurements, we show
that the solar wind variability detected in situ by Solar Orbiter in March
2022 is driven by spatio-temporal changes in the magnetic connectivity to
multiple sources in the solar atmosphere. The magnetic feld footpoints
connected to the spacecraft moved from the boundaries of a coronal hole
to one active region (12961) and then across to another region (12957). This
is refected in the in situ measurements, which show the transition from fast
to highly Alfvénic then to slow solar wind that is disrupted by the arrival of
a coronal mass ejection. Our results describe solar wind variability at 0.5 au
but are applicable to near-Earth observatories.
The increased availability of biomedical data, particularly in the public domain, offers the opportunity to better understand human health and to develop effective therapeutics for a wide range of unmet medical needs. However, data scientists remain stymied by the fact that data remain hard to find and to productively reuse because data and their metadata i) are wholly inaccessible, ii) are in non-standard or incompatible representations, iii) do not conform to community standards, and iv) have unclear or highly restricted terms and conditions that preclude legitimate reuse. These limitations require a rethink on data can be made machine and AI-ready - the key motivation behind the FAIR Guiding Principles. Concurrently, while recent efforts have explored the use of deep learning to fuse disparate data into predictive models for a wide range of biomedical applications, these models often fail even when the correct answer is already known, and fail to explain individual predictions in terms that data scientists can appreciate. These limitations suggest that new methods to produce practical artificial intelligence are still needed.
In this talk, I will discuss our work in (1) building an integrative knowledge infrastructure to prepare FAIR and "AI-ready" data and services along with (2) neurosymbolic AI methods to improve the quality of predictions and to generate plausible explanations. Attention is given to standards, platforms, and methods to wrangle knowledge into simple, but effective semantic and latent representations, and to make these available into standards-compliant and discoverable interfaces that can be used in model building, validation, and explanation. Our work, and those of others in the field, creates a baseline for building trustworthy and easy to deploy AI models in biomedicine.
Bio
Dr. Michel Dumontier is the Distinguished Professor of Data Science at Maastricht University, founder and executive director of the Institute of Data Science, and co-founder of the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) data principles. His research explores socio-technological approaches for responsible discovery science, which includes collaborative multi-modal knowledge graphs, privacy-preserving distributed data mining, and AI methods for drug discovery and personalized medicine. His work is supported through the Dutch National Research Agenda, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Horizon Europe, the European Open Science Cloud, the US National Institutes of Health, and a Marie-Curie Innovative Training Network. He is the editor-in-chief for the journal Data Science and is internationally recognized for his contributions in bioinformatics, biomedical informatics, and semantic technologies including ontologies and linked data.
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
insect taxonomy importance systematics and classification
Bentham and hooker system of classification
1. Sharad Suresh Kambale
Assistant Professor,
Department of Botany,
Maratha Vidya Prasarak Samaj’s Arts, Commerce
& Science College, Tryambakeshwar,
Nashik- 422212.
Email: skambalesu@gmail.com
Contact no.: 09623127314
Natural system of classification by
Bentham and Hooker
2. Natural system of classification according to Bentham and Hooker
George Bentham (1800-1884) Joseph Dalton Hooker(1817-1911)
3. Introduction:
Artificial system of classification found to be irrational.
Comparative morphology is important to determine relationships.
System which reflects the natural affinities in plants is known as
‘Natural system of Classification’.
George Bentham & Joseph Dalton Hooker, two British botanists
published ‘Genera plantarum’.
They provided the natural system of classification in their book.
Names, description and classification of 200 families, 7569 genera
and 97205 species have been given.
Larger genera subdivided into subgenera and sections.
They used term ‘Order’ for ‘Family’ and ‘Cohort’ for ‘Order’.
14. Series 2: Discifloreae
Hypogynous disc often present.
Stamens definite.
As many as or twice the petals.
Cohort/ Order 7: Geraniales (Androecium
obdiplostemonous, ovules pendulous, raphe ventral)
Linaceae Ochnaceae Rutaceae
Meliaceae
Burseraceae
19. Series 3: Calycifloreae
Sepals united.
Stamens peri or epigynous.
Cohort/ Order 11: Rosales
(Stamens indefinite, often twice
or more the number of petals,
styles distinct).
Rosaceae
Connaraceae
Leguminosae
Droseraceae
Crassulaceae
20. Cohort/ Order 12: Myrtales (Stamens definite, rarely
indefinite, flowers peri or epigynous).
Myrtaceae Rhizophoraceae
Combretaceae
Onagraceae
Lythraceae
22. Cohort/ Order 14: Ficoidales (Perianth undifferentiated, ovules on axile
or basal placentation).
Cactaceae
Molluginaceae
23. Cohort/ Order 15: Umbellales (Inflorescence umbellate).
Apiaceae Araliaceae
24. Subclass Gamopetalae (Corolla of united petals).
Series 4: Inferae (Stamens as many as petals and alternating with them,
ovary inferior).
Cohort/Order 16: Rubiales (Stamens epipetalous, anthers distinct, ovary
2- many locular, locules 1- many ovuled)
Rubiaceae
25. Cohort/Order 17: Asterales (Stamens epipetalous, anthers distinct or united, ovary 1
locular, locules 1 ovuled)
Asteraceae
26. Cohort/Order 18: Campanulales (Stamens not adnate to corolla, ovary 2-6 locular,
locules many ovuled)
Lobeliaceae Stylidiaceae
27. Series 5 Heteromerae (Stamens as many as corolla lobes or many, ovary superior or
inferior, carpels more than 2, generally isomerous with corolla lobes).
Cohort/Order 19: Ericales (Stamens twice the corolla lobes or isomerous and
alternating with them).
Ericaceae Vacciniaceae
28. Cohort/Order 20: Primulales (Stamens twice the corolla lobes or
isomerous and alternating with them).
Primulacae Plumbaginaceae
29. Cohort/Order 21: Ebenales (Stamens as many as corolla lobes
or many and opposite with them).
Ebenaceae
Sapotaceae
Symplocaceae
30. Series 6 Bicarpellate (Stamens as many as corolla lobes
and or few and alternate with them, ovary usually bicarpellary
and superior).
Cohort/Order 22: Gentianales (Corolla
actinomorphic, leaves usually opposite).
Gentianaceae
Salvadoraceae
Apocynaceae
Oleaceae
33. Cohort/Order 24: Personales
Corolla Zygomorphic .
Posterior stamens usually reduced to
staminodes.
Ovules often more than 4.
Martyniaceae
Bignoniaceae
Bignoniaceae
36. Subclass Monochlamydeae (Perianth 1 or biseriate, mostly sepaloid, minute or
absent)
Series 7: Curvembryeae (Seeds usually with mealy endosperm, embryo curved,
lateral or peripheral; ovary usually single ovuled)
Amaranthaceae Chenopodiaceae Polygonaceae
50. Series 20 Apocarpae
Perianth 1 to 2 seriate or absent,
Carpel solitary or apocarpous,
Seeds non-endospermic
Aponogetonaceae Alismataceae
51. Series 21 Glumaceae
Flowers in dense inflorescences
subtended by bracts or glumes,
Perianth reduced, glumaceous or
absent
Ovary one loculed with one ovule
Cyperaceae Poaceae
Eriocaulaceae
52. Merits:
First ad best natural system.
Easy to understand and most connvinient in the field.
The position of Discifloreae in between Thalamifloreae and
Calycifloreae is acceptable.
The place of order Ranales is rational.
Monocots are placed after dicots which shows they are derived
from dicots which is acceptable
53. Limitations:
Its not phylogenetic.
Many important floral characters are not considered.
Gymnosperms are kept in between dicot and monocot which is not
correct.
Closely related families have been widely separated and vice-versa.
eg. Chenopodiaceae and Caryophylaceae are kept away from each other.
Monochlamydeae is kept away from polypetalae.
Monochlamydeae has not been subdivided into series but direct orders.
Apocarpae in monocot should have been placed in thebeginning.
Orchidaceae and Scitamineae which are with many advanced characters
are kept in the beginning.
Origin of Angiosperms is not clear.