Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Virtual lab meeting 12 August 2020
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Virtual lab meeting
12 August 2020
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and ...apaari
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Virtual lab meeting
13 August 2020
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and ...apaari
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Virtual lab meeting
14 August 2020
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and ...apaari
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Virtual lab meeting 11 August 2020
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and ...apaari
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Virtual lab meeting
10 August 2020
4th SEALNET meeting, item 8: Training on internal quality control - Preparing...Soils FAO-GSP
How to prepare and use internal quality control soil samples - Rob De Hayr, GLOSOLAN Vice-Chair
4th Asian Soil Laboratory Network (SEALNET) meeting (online), 30 June - 2 July 2020
The document discusses Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards which were mandated by the FDA and EPA in the 1970s after cases of laboratory malpractice and fraudulent research studies surfaced. GLP standards establish rules for conducting non-clinical safety studies submitted to regulatory agencies and help assure the quality and integrity of study data. Key aspects of GLP compliance include requirements for documentation, equipment calibration and maintenance, proper labeling and use of reagents and chemicals.
4th SEALNET meeting, item 8: Training on internal quality control - Overview ...Soils FAO-GSP
Overview of internal quality control measures - Rob De Hayr, GLOSOLAN Vice-Chair
4th Asian Soil Laboratory Network (SEALNET) meeting (online), 30 June - 2 July 2020
CCK Discussion Forum on Impurity Emergence: A Wake Up Call for Drug Safety & Quality - 13 Oct 2019 at ICCBS, University of Karachi. Session largely participated by qualified and experienced pharmaceutical professionals having diversified educational background and experience.
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and ...apaari
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Virtual lab meeting
13 August 2020
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and ...apaari
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Virtual lab meeting
14 August 2020
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and ...apaari
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Virtual lab meeting 11 August 2020
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and ...apaari
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Virtual lab meeting
10 August 2020
4th SEALNET meeting, item 8: Training on internal quality control - Preparing...Soils FAO-GSP
How to prepare and use internal quality control soil samples - Rob De Hayr, GLOSOLAN Vice-Chair
4th Asian Soil Laboratory Network (SEALNET) meeting (online), 30 June - 2 July 2020
The document discusses Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards which were mandated by the FDA and EPA in the 1970s after cases of laboratory malpractice and fraudulent research studies surfaced. GLP standards establish rules for conducting non-clinical safety studies submitted to regulatory agencies and help assure the quality and integrity of study data. Key aspects of GLP compliance include requirements for documentation, equipment calibration and maintenance, proper labeling and use of reagents and chemicals.
4th SEALNET meeting, item 8: Training on internal quality control - Overview ...Soils FAO-GSP
Overview of internal quality control measures - Rob De Hayr, GLOSOLAN Vice-Chair
4th Asian Soil Laboratory Network (SEALNET) meeting (online), 30 June - 2 July 2020
CCK Discussion Forum on Impurity Emergence: A Wake Up Call for Drug Safety & Quality - 13 Oct 2019 at ICCBS, University of Karachi. Session largely participated by qualified and experienced pharmaceutical professionals having diversified educational background and experience.
Calibration and Quality controls of automated hematology analyzerPranav S
This document discusses calibration and quality control of automated hematology analyzers. It begins with a brief history of hematology and automation in the field. Ensuring accurate results through quality assurance is important, involving preventative, assessment, and corrective activities like standardization, internal quality control, and external quality proficiency testing. Proper documentation, training, environment control, and management of preanalytical variables are among the general requirements for quality control and calibration. Calibration must be performed on new or repaired analyzers, and internal and external quality controls help monitor and ensure accuracy of results.
This document discusses key concepts in quality assurance and quality control for analytical chemistry measurements. It defines terms like accuracy, precision, systematic and random errors. It also describes common quality control measures used to ensure quality of analytical data, including calibration standards, blanks, recovery studies, precision and accuracy studies, and method detection limits. Key quality control samples are discussed like matrix spikes, laboratory control samples, and surrogates.
Handling of Refernce Standards_Dr.A.Amsavel Dr. Amsavel A
Definition
Requirements
Guidelines
Pharmacopiea
Types of Reference Standards
SOP for handling of Reference Standards
Qualification of Secondary Standards
Assigning Potency, Storage and Use
Documents & Records
analytical method validation and validation of hplcvenkatesh thota
The document summarizes a seminar on analytical method validation and validation of HPLC. It discusses parameters for method validation according to USP, BP, and ICH guidelines such as accuracy, precision, linearity, range, specificity, detection limit, and quantitation limit. It also covers validation of typical HPLC systems through qualification, design, installation, operational, and performance qualification. Key parameters evaluated during HPLC method validation are discussed, including system suitability tests involving retention factor, relative retention, theoretical plates, resolution, and tailing factor.
This document discusses key concepts in quality control and quality assurance for analytical chemistry measurements. It defines terms like quality assurance, quality control, accuracy, precision, calibration curves, blanks, recovery studies, method detection limits, and quantitation limits. Accuracy refers to how close a measurement is to the true value, while precision refers to the agreement between multiple measurements. Systematic errors can be controlled, while random errors are unavoidable. Quality control measures like calibration, blanks, spikes, and duplicate samples ensure accuracy and precision.
This document discusses key concepts in quality control and quality assurance for analytical chemistry measurements. It defines terms like quality assurance, quality control, accuracy, precision, calibration curves, blanks, recovery studies, method detection limits, and more. Quality control measures like standards, blanks, recovery studies, precision/accuracy studies, and method detection limits are used to assess data quality.
This document outlines Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulations which provide a framework for laboratory studies. It discusses general GLP requirements including laboratory premises, personnel, equipment, chemicals and reagents, housekeeping, maintenance, calibration, reference materials, microbiological cultures, quality systems, audits, standard operating procedures, protocols, raw data storage and archiving. Specific requirements are provided for laboratory design, equipment, chemicals, safety practices, calibration, reference standards, microbial cultures, quality systems, audits and corrective actions. Internal audits are conducted periodically to ensure ongoing compliance.
The document discusses Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) which have been introduced as law in India. GLP aim to ensure quality and validity of safety test data for chemicals, pharmaceuticals, foods and cosmetics. Key aspects of GLP include infrastructure, personnel training, equipment calibration and validation of analytical methods. Proper documentation of standards, reagents, equipment calibration and analyst training are important for maintaining GLP compliance in quality control laboratories. Adhering to GLP helps generate accurate and reliable analytical results.
GLP (Good Laboratory Practice) is a set of principles established by the FDA in 1978 to ensure the quality and integrity of safety data submitted for regulatory purposes. Key aspects of GLP include standardized facilities, equipment, test systems, operating procedures, personnel responsibilities, and record keeping. Studies must follow detailed study plans and SOPs. Quality assurance programs verify compliance. Proper storage and retention of raw data, samples, and reports is also required under GLP guidelines.
GLP (Good Laboratory Practice) is a formal regulation created by the FDA in 1978 to ensure the quality and integrity of safety data involved in regulatory decision making. It was developed because of cases of poor laboratory practices, fraudulent activities, and inaccurate reporting of studies. GLP principles provide a framework for planning, conducting, monitoring, recording, reporting and archiving laboratory studies according to standard operating procedures. Following GLP helps ensure the reliability and integrity of data, provides better control and guidelines for laboratory processes, and gives companies conducting research a quality image in the global market.
The document discusses the history and evolution of good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines and their application to bioanalytical laboratories. It notes that GCP principles began emerging in the 1960s-1980s and became more established in the 2000s-2010s. Bioanalytical labs were traditionally viewed as preclinical "GLP areas" but are now expected to also follow GCP principles when analyzing samples from clinical trials. The document examines how GCP has impacted various areas of bioanalytical work like method changes, communication, and reporting of anomalous results.
This document provides an overview of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards. GLP standards are concerned with ensuring quality in non-clinical health and safety studies. They aim to promote quality data and sound management of laboratory studies. GLP standards apply to non-clinical studies intended to evaluate safety for submission to regulatory authorities. Key aspects of GLP covered include resources, facilities, equipment, personnel responsibilities and training, characterization of test items, study protocols, record keeping, and quality assurance.
Calibration establishes the relationship between instrument measurements and known standard values through a series of steps. Key aspects of calibration include identifying instruments and sources, following calibration procedures, documenting results, accounting for sources of error, and ensuring traceability to national standards. Calibration procedures vary based on instrument type, but generally involve evaluating instrument performance, establishing calibration curves using certified reference materials at multiple concentration levels, and quantifying samples based on the calibration curves.
Points to Consider in QC Method Validation and Transfer for Biological ProductsWeijun Li
The document discusses considerations for analytical method validation and transfer for biological products. It provides three case studies as examples:
1) Creating spiking materials for size exclusion chromatography (SEC) validation by inducing chemical reactions to form aggregates and low molecular weight species for use in spiking studies.
2) Conducting a practice run with mock samples prior to an analytical method transfer to identify potential issues. The practice run failed equivalence testing, indicating differences between the labs.
3) Troubleshooting the practice run by examining potential differences in stock standards and standard curves between labs. Analysis found a less than 1% difference in stock standards but differences in standard curve slopes and intercepts between labs.
The document describes several kaizen projects undertaken by the QC Microbiology department to improve processes. One project reduced the frequency of potable water sampling from once every 15 days to once a month, saving over Rs. 80,000 annually in testing costs and technician time. Another harmonized standard operating procedures for microbial cell banks, reducing the number of documents from 20 to 3. A further project eliminated the use of open flames inside biosafety cabinets, improving safety and airflow.
The document discusses Good Laboratory Practices (GLP), which are standards that provide a framework for conducting and reporting laboratory studies. It notes that GLP was developed in response to cases of fraud and poor practices found by the FDA in the 1970s. Key aspects of GLP include standardized operating procedures, trained personnel, appropriate facilities and equipment, meticulous record-keeping, and reporting of study results. GLP is intended to ensure reliability and integrity of nonclinical safety data submitted to regulatory authorities.
Planning: The Difference Between a Successful Medical Device Preclinical GLP ...Surpass, Inc
Excellent planning of your Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) preclinical study for your medical device or combination product is critical for successful translation into the clinic. In the following slides we present helpful hints for study planning to ensure a successful pivotal GLP safety study.
The document discusses Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), which are quality standards that regulate the conduct of laboratory studies related to health and safety. It provides background on GLP, including that GLP was created by the FDA in the 1970s in response to cases of fraudulent laboratory practices. The key objectives of GLP are to ensure laboratory study data is accurate, traceable, and can be relied upon for regulatory decision making. GLP establishes requirements for facilities, equipment, personnel, methods, records, and management to ensure the integrity of all safety data generated during nonclinical health and environmental safety studies.
Countries’ presentation on internal quality control: China 1ExternalEvents
The second lab managers’ meeting of the South-East Asia Laboratory NETwork (SEALNET) took place on 19 - 23 November 2018 in ICAR-IISS (Indian Institute of Soil Science), Bhopal, India.
Ms. Liping Yang , China National Center for Quality Supervision and Test of Chemical Fertilizers, Beijing, 2nd Day
Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulations are applied to non-clinical safety of study items contained in pharmaceutical products, cosmetic products, veterinary drugs, devices as well as food additives. The purpose of testing these items is to obtain information on their safety with respect to human health and environment. GLP is also required for registration purpose and licensing of pharmaceuticals, pesticides, food additives, veterinary drug products and some bio-products.
GLP is a formal FDA regulation created in 1978 that provides principles for conducting laboratory studies in a standard, consistent manner. It aims to ensure quality and integrity of data submitted to the FDA. Key GLP principles include requirements for test facility organization, quality assurance programs, facilities, equipment, test systems, standard operating procedures, study conduct, reporting, and record keeping. GLP helps provide reliable results and protects study integrity and data for regulating products like drugs and pesticides.
This document outlines the principles of Good Laboratory Practices (GLP). GLP provides a framework for conducting laboratory studies and ensuring quality and integrity of data. The key points covered include defining GLP and its purpose of certifying valid study steps. Ten GLP principles are described relating to laboratory organization, facilities, equipment, test systems, methods, and record keeping. Maintaining proper documentation, conducting quality assurance inspections, and retaining records and materials are emphasized. In conclusion, following GLP guidelines helps produce high quality data and ensures proper laboratory management.
Calibration and Quality controls of automated hematology analyzerPranav S
This document discusses calibration and quality control of automated hematology analyzers. It begins with a brief history of hematology and automation in the field. Ensuring accurate results through quality assurance is important, involving preventative, assessment, and corrective activities like standardization, internal quality control, and external quality proficiency testing. Proper documentation, training, environment control, and management of preanalytical variables are among the general requirements for quality control and calibration. Calibration must be performed on new or repaired analyzers, and internal and external quality controls help monitor and ensure accuracy of results.
This document discusses key concepts in quality assurance and quality control for analytical chemistry measurements. It defines terms like accuracy, precision, systematic and random errors. It also describes common quality control measures used to ensure quality of analytical data, including calibration standards, blanks, recovery studies, precision and accuracy studies, and method detection limits. Key quality control samples are discussed like matrix spikes, laboratory control samples, and surrogates.
Handling of Refernce Standards_Dr.A.Amsavel Dr. Amsavel A
Definition
Requirements
Guidelines
Pharmacopiea
Types of Reference Standards
SOP for handling of Reference Standards
Qualification of Secondary Standards
Assigning Potency, Storage and Use
Documents & Records
analytical method validation and validation of hplcvenkatesh thota
The document summarizes a seminar on analytical method validation and validation of HPLC. It discusses parameters for method validation according to USP, BP, and ICH guidelines such as accuracy, precision, linearity, range, specificity, detection limit, and quantitation limit. It also covers validation of typical HPLC systems through qualification, design, installation, operational, and performance qualification. Key parameters evaluated during HPLC method validation are discussed, including system suitability tests involving retention factor, relative retention, theoretical plates, resolution, and tailing factor.
This document discusses key concepts in quality control and quality assurance for analytical chemistry measurements. It defines terms like quality assurance, quality control, accuracy, precision, calibration curves, blanks, recovery studies, method detection limits, and quantitation limits. Accuracy refers to how close a measurement is to the true value, while precision refers to the agreement between multiple measurements. Systematic errors can be controlled, while random errors are unavoidable. Quality control measures like calibration, blanks, spikes, and duplicate samples ensure accuracy and precision.
This document discusses key concepts in quality control and quality assurance for analytical chemistry measurements. It defines terms like quality assurance, quality control, accuracy, precision, calibration curves, blanks, recovery studies, method detection limits, and more. Quality control measures like standards, blanks, recovery studies, precision/accuracy studies, and method detection limits are used to assess data quality.
This document outlines Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulations which provide a framework for laboratory studies. It discusses general GLP requirements including laboratory premises, personnel, equipment, chemicals and reagents, housekeeping, maintenance, calibration, reference materials, microbiological cultures, quality systems, audits, standard operating procedures, protocols, raw data storage and archiving. Specific requirements are provided for laboratory design, equipment, chemicals, safety practices, calibration, reference standards, microbial cultures, quality systems, audits and corrective actions. Internal audits are conducted periodically to ensure ongoing compliance.
The document discusses Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) which have been introduced as law in India. GLP aim to ensure quality and validity of safety test data for chemicals, pharmaceuticals, foods and cosmetics. Key aspects of GLP include infrastructure, personnel training, equipment calibration and validation of analytical methods. Proper documentation of standards, reagents, equipment calibration and analyst training are important for maintaining GLP compliance in quality control laboratories. Adhering to GLP helps generate accurate and reliable analytical results.
GLP (Good Laboratory Practice) is a set of principles established by the FDA in 1978 to ensure the quality and integrity of safety data submitted for regulatory purposes. Key aspects of GLP include standardized facilities, equipment, test systems, operating procedures, personnel responsibilities, and record keeping. Studies must follow detailed study plans and SOPs. Quality assurance programs verify compliance. Proper storage and retention of raw data, samples, and reports is also required under GLP guidelines.
GLP (Good Laboratory Practice) is a formal regulation created by the FDA in 1978 to ensure the quality and integrity of safety data involved in regulatory decision making. It was developed because of cases of poor laboratory practices, fraudulent activities, and inaccurate reporting of studies. GLP principles provide a framework for planning, conducting, monitoring, recording, reporting and archiving laboratory studies according to standard operating procedures. Following GLP helps ensure the reliability and integrity of data, provides better control and guidelines for laboratory processes, and gives companies conducting research a quality image in the global market.
The document discusses the history and evolution of good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines and their application to bioanalytical laboratories. It notes that GCP principles began emerging in the 1960s-1980s and became more established in the 2000s-2010s. Bioanalytical labs were traditionally viewed as preclinical "GLP areas" but are now expected to also follow GCP principles when analyzing samples from clinical trials. The document examines how GCP has impacted various areas of bioanalytical work like method changes, communication, and reporting of anomalous results.
This document provides an overview of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards. GLP standards are concerned with ensuring quality in non-clinical health and safety studies. They aim to promote quality data and sound management of laboratory studies. GLP standards apply to non-clinical studies intended to evaluate safety for submission to regulatory authorities. Key aspects of GLP covered include resources, facilities, equipment, personnel responsibilities and training, characterization of test items, study protocols, record keeping, and quality assurance.
Calibration establishes the relationship between instrument measurements and known standard values through a series of steps. Key aspects of calibration include identifying instruments and sources, following calibration procedures, documenting results, accounting for sources of error, and ensuring traceability to national standards. Calibration procedures vary based on instrument type, but generally involve evaluating instrument performance, establishing calibration curves using certified reference materials at multiple concentration levels, and quantifying samples based on the calibration curves.
Points to Consider in QC Method Validation and Transfer for Biological ProductsWeijun Li
The document discusses considerations for analytical method validation and transfer for biological products. It provides three case studies as examples:
1) Creating spiking materials for size exclusion chromatography (SEC) validation by inducing chemical reactions to form aggregates and low molecular weight species for use in spiking studies.
2) Conducting a practice run with mock samples prior to an analytical method transfer to identify potential issues. The practice run failed equivalence testing, indicating differences between the labs.
3) Troubleshooting the practice run by examining potential differences in stock standards and standard curves between labs. Analysis found a less than 1% difference in stock standards but differences in standard curve slopes and intercepts between labs.
The document describes several kaizen projects undertaken by the QC Microbiology department to improve processes. One project reduced the frequency of potable water sampling from once every 15 days to once a month, saving over Rs. 80,000 annually in testing costs and technician time. Another harmonized standard operating procedures for microbial cell banks, reducing the number of documents from 20 to 3. A further project eliminated the use of open flames inside biosafety cabinets, improving safety and airflow.
The document discusses Good Laboratory Practices (GLP), which are standards that provide a framework for conducting and reporting laboratory studies. It notes that GLP was developed in response to cases of fraud and poor practices found by the FDA in the 1970s. Key aspects of GLP include standardized operating procedures, trained personnel, appropriate facilities and equipment, meticulous record-keeping, and reporting of study results. GLP is intended to ensure reliability and integrity of nonclinical safety data submitted to regulatory authorities.
Planning: The Difference Between a Successful Medical Device Preclinical GLP ...Surpass, Inc
Excellent planning of your Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) preclinical study for your medical device or combination product is critical for successful translation into the clinic. In the following slides we present helpful hints for study planning to ensure a successful pivotal GLP safety study.
The document discusses Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), which are quality standards that regulate the conduct of laboratory studies related to health and safety. It provides background on GLP, including that GLP was created by the FDA in the 1970s in response to cases of fraudulent laboratory practices. The key objectives of GLP are to ensure laboratory study data is accurate, traceable, and can be relied upon for regulatory decision making. GLP establishes requirements for facilities, equipment, personnel, methods, records, and management to ensure the integrity of all safety data generated during nonclinical health and environmental safety studies.
Countries’ presentation on internal quality control: China 1ExternalEvents
The second lab managers’ meeting of the South-East Asia Laboratory NETwork (SEALNET) took place on 19 - 23 November 2018 in ICAR-IISS (Indian Institute of Soil Science), Bhopal, India.
Ms. Liping Yang , China National Center for Quality Supervision and Test of Chemical Fertilizers, Beijing, 2nd Day
Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulations are applied to non-clinical safety of study items contained in pharmaceutical products, cosmetic products, veterinary drugs, devices as well as food additives. The purpose of testing these items is to obtain information on their safety with respect to human health and environment. GLP is also required for registration purpose and licensing of pharmaceuticals, pesticides, food additives, veterinary drug products and some bio-products.
Similar to Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Virtual lab meeting 12 August 2020
GLP is a formal FDA regulation created in 1978 that provides principles for conducting laboratory studies in a standard, consistent manner. It aims to ensure quality and integrity of data submitted to the FDA. Key GLP principles include requirements for test facility organization, quality assurance programs, facilities, equipment, test systems, standard operating procedures, study conduct, reporting, and record keeping. GLP helps provide reliable results and protects study integrity and data for regulating products like drugs and pesticides.
This document outlines the principles of Good Laboratory Practices (GLP). GLP provides a framework for conducting laboratory studies and ensuring quality and integrity of data. The key points covered include defining GLP and its purpose of certifying valid study steps. Ten GLP principles are described relating to laboratory organization, facilities, equipment, test systems, methods, and record keeping. Maintaining proper documentation, conducting quality assurance inspections, and retaining records and materials are emphasized. In conclusion, following GLP guidelines helps produce high quality data and ensures proper laboratory management.
GLP (Good Laboratory Practices) regulations were established by the FDA in the late 1970s after investigations uncovered fraudulent practices and poor laboratory standards in toxicology testing submitted to the agency. The regulations provide a framework to ensure uniformity, quality and integrity of safety testing data. Noncompliance can result in disqualification of a testing facility, rejection of study data, and other consequences like public notification or legal action. A disqualified facility can apply for reinstatement by demonstrating corrective actions taken to assure future compliance.
The document discusses the 12 quality system essentials for managing laboratory equipment. It covers:
1) Proper selection, acquisition, installation, operation qualification, performance qualification, off-label use, calibration, maintenance, and decommissioning of equipment.
2) The selection qualification process includes defining selection criteria such as costs, maintenance needs, and equipment features.
3) Equipment must be uniquely identified and an equipment master file created. Installation qualification confirms proper installation. Operational qualification confirms functionality. Performance qualification confirms acceptable results under normal operation.
This document provides an overview of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) principles established by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). GLP was created in response to cases of fraudulent laboratory practices and aims to ensure the quality and validity of non-clinical safety studies. The key principles include requirements for test facility organization, quality assurance programs, facilities, equipment, test systems, test items, standard operating procedures, study conduct, reporting, and record keeping. Following GLP aims to yield data that accurately reflect study results and ensure international acceptance of safety tests.
The document provides details on method development for chromatography. It discusses defining key terms, developing a test method plan, optimizing methods through experimental design techniques like factorial design. The method development process involves studying samples, setting goals, reviewing literature, selecting an approach, optimizing parameters, and finalizing the method. Critical parameters like column length and temperature, flow rate, mobile phase composition are identified for optimization. Formal validation is required once the method is developed.
This document summarizes ICH Q7 guidelines for good manufacturing practices for active pharmaceutical ingredients. It discusses general requirements including documentation, testing methods, certificates of analysis, stability monitoring, expiry and retest dates, and retention of samples. Key aspects covered are specifications for impurities, handling of out-of-specification results, management of reagents and standards, contents of certificates of analysis, types and frequency of stability studies, and retention policies for reserve samples.
This document discusses quality assurance in blood banking. It outlines that quality is an ongoing process involving planning, doing, checking, and acting in a continuous cycle. Quality control ensures processes, procedures, and products meet requirements through consistency checks. Blood banking requires separate areas for donor selection, collection, processing, storage, and laboratory and auxiliary facilities. Quality requirements involve quality control testing, audits, personnel organization, premises/equipment/materials, documentation, processing, complaints/recalls, and investigating errors/accidents.
Forms and formats help for lab accreditationNaadhNadiya
Dr. Neeraj has provided a list of records and formats necessary to meet ISO standards for laboratories. The list includes over 50 documents across various areas like management, employees, equipment, quality control, audits and more. Standard operating procedures and formats are given for communication, document control, service agreements, evaluations, audits, training and more. The laboratory may use these suggested formats or modify them as needed and add more over time to maintain compliance with ISO standards.
GLP (Good Laboratory Practice) is a quality system with defined standards for conducting studies and reporting results. It ensures uniformity, consistency, reliability and reproducibility of testing through elements like SOPs, personnel roles, equipment validation and laboratory safety practices. Key aspects of GLP include establishing an independent quality assurance unit, documenting all study activities, ensuring personnel are qualified and equipment is properly maintained and calibrated, and archiving records for a defined period of time. Following GLP helps provide reasonable assurance that study results were collected as outlined and can be relied upon, even if it does not guarantee the scientific merit of the study itself.
Good laboratory practice guidelines. GLP IN INDIA. selvaraj227
The document discusses Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) guidelines. It provides an introduction to GLP, including that GLP deals with how laboratory studies are planned, performed, monitored and reported to ensure quality and validity of test data. The history and purpose of GLP are then outlined, noting it was established to prevent fraud and promote standardized, high-quality non-clinical safety testing. Ten GLP principles are also summarized, covering topics like facilities, equipment and management responsibilities. Finally, the scope and current status of GLP in India are briefly addressed.
This document provides an overview of Good Laboratory Practices (GLP). It discusses that GLP aims to assure regulatory authorities that safety study data submitted to them are reliable and accurate. The document traces the history and development of GLP from cases of poor laboratory practices in the 1970s. It describes the key principles of GLP including requirements for facilities, equipment, test systems, personnel responsibilities, standard operating procedures, and reporting of study results. Adherence to GLP aims to produce high quality and integrity of nonclinical safety data.
It is difficult to maintain the sterility and It is more difficult to investigate when the status is Non sterile. So this ppt narrate the way for you to investigate the Non sterility.
Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) is a formal set of regulations established by the US FDA in 1976 to ensure that non-clinical safety studies are of high quality and are accurately reported. GLP covers the organizational processes and conditions under which non-clinical health and environmental safety studies are planned, performed, monitored, recorded, reported and archived. It aims to assure that study data accurately reflect the results obtained during the study and allows for mutual acceptance of data between countries. GLP requires strict adherence to standard operating procedures, record keeping, facilities management, and quality assurance programs to ensure the integrity of preclinical safety testing.
The document discusses the performance of studies according to Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) guidelines. It covers the key aspects of performing a study, including developing a study plan, specifying the content of the study plan such as objectives, methods and records to be retained, and properly conducting the study according to the plan. The study plan should exist prior to initiating the study and include identification of tests, sponsors, facilities, methods, dose levels and experimental design. All raw data generated during the study should be recorded accurately and any changes documented. Unique identification should be given to each study and it must adhere to the approved study plan.
ISO/IEC 17025 outlines the requirements for laboratories to demonstrate competence and generate reliable test and calibration results. It covers management requirements like documentation, audits, and reviews as well as technical requirements for personnel, methods, equipment, measurement traceability and reporting. The standard requires laboratories to have a quality management system in place to ensure consistent, valid results and provide traceable measurements that can be compared internationally through an unbroken chain of calibrations.
Presentation on good laoratory practice (glp)AshishVerma571
GLP is a formal regulation established by the FDA in 1978 that provides a framework for conducting laboratory studies in a planned, monitored and documented manner. It was introduced in response to cases of fraud in safety data submitted to the FDA. GLP requires that facilities, equipment, personnel and study plans be qualified and that studies be conducted according to standard operating procedures to ensure the quality and integrity of data. Studies must be properly designed, performed, monitored, recorded, reported and archived to comply with GLP.
Similar to Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Virtual lab meeting 12 August 2020 (20)
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and ...apaari
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Inception Meeting,
7 August 2020
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and ...apaari
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Inception Meeting,
6 August 2020
Transformation of Agricultural Innovation System, the Roleof the National Agr...apaari
Transformation of Agricultural Innovation System, the Roleof the National Agricultural Research System (NARS): A Success Story from the Philippines by Marita A. Carlos, Richard E. Amansec, Alexandra Cabrera, Jose Tomas Cabagay, Melvin B. Carlos and Reynaldo V. Ebora, Department of Science and Technology, Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic and Natural Resources Research and Development DOST-PCAARRD
The Role of Knowledge Management in Agricultural Innovation Systems (AIS)apaari
The Role of Knowledge Management in Agricultural Innovation Systems (AIS) by Martina Spisiakova, Knowledge Management Coordinator, Asia Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions (APAARI)
Conceptual Model on Establishing Agricultural Knowledge Sharing Network of Ir...apaari
Conceptual Model on Establishing Agricultural Knowledge Sharing Network of Iran (AKSI) by Mazier Amirhosseini, PhD
Agricultural Research, Education, Extension Organization (AREEO), Academic Relations and International Affairs (ARIA)
APAARI Webinar with Universities on Capacity Development for Agricultural Inn...apaari
APAARI Webinar with Universities on Capacity Development for Agricultural Innovation Systems - Bringing system-wide change in Asia-Pacific - 30 November 2018
Biosafety Assessment and Regulations of Gene Editing apaari
Biosafety Assessment and Regulations of Gene Editing by Dr. Vibha Ahuja during the Regional Expert Consultation on Gene Editing in Agriculture and its Regulations Technical Session III
Editing rice-genome with CRISPR/Cas9: To improve agronomic traits for increa...apaari
Editing rice-genome with CRISPR/Cas9: To improve agronomic traits for increased crop productivity by MK Reddy during the Regional Expert Consultation on Gene Editing in Agriculture and its Regulations Technical Session III
The Regulatory Status of Genome Editing Technology in Thailand apaari
The Regulatory Status of Genome Editing Technology in Thailand by Dr. Piyarat Thammakijjawat during the Regional Expert Consultation on Gene Editing in Agriculture and its Regulations Technical Session II
Regulatory Status of Gene Editing: Philippinesapaari
Regulatory Status of Gene Editing: Philippines by Saturnina C Halos during the Regional Expert Consultation on Gene Editing in Agriculture and its Regulations Technical Session II
Regulatory Status of Genome Editing in Vietnam apaari
Regulatory Status of Genome Editing in Vietnam during the Regional Expert Consultation on Gene Editing in Agriculture and its Regulations Technical Session II
Current Status of Gene-editing Product and Relative Regulations in Taiwan apaari
Current Status of Gene-editing Product and Relative Regulations in Taiwan by Chwan-Yang Hong during the Regional Expert Consultation on Gene Editing in Agriculture and its Regulations Technical Session II
Japanese Regulatory Policy of Genome Editing Technologyapaari
This document discusses Japan's regulatory policies for genome editing technology and genetically modified organisms (GMOs). It provides an overview of the country's regulatory framework for GMOs, which assesses impacts on biodiversity and requires food/feed safety assessments. Genome-edited organisms that do not contain foreign DNA or its remnants are not considered GMOs. The document outlines what information developers must provide to authorities for genome-edited foods, including the editing method, modified gene functions, and confirmation of no adverse health effects or foreign DNA. It aims to provide public understanding of genome-edited foods while still requiring a safety assessment for those containing extracellular DNA.
Regulatory Status of Gene Editing in the Pacific SIDSapaari
Regulatory Status of Gene Editing in the Pacific SIDS by Dr Ramakrishna Akkinapally during the Regional Expert Consultation on Gene Editing in Agriculture and its Regulations Technical Session II
Global Regulatory Status of Gene Edited Products apaari
Global Regulatory Status of Gene Edited Products by S. Ruthner during the Regional Expert Consultation on Gene Editing in Agriculture and its Regulations Technical Session I
Gene editing with CRISPR/Cas9: sorghum as a case studyapaari
This document summarizes a presentation on using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to improve sorghum. The presentation discusses using gene editing to increase grain size and protein content in sorghum, which could improve its use for animal feed. It describes ongoing research knocking out specific genes to increase grain size by over 10% and protein content by up to 24%. If successful, this could increase sorghum yields and protein per hectare for uses like poultry feed. The presentation notes that gene edited crops may not be classified as GMOs, depending on regulatory decisions, and outlines ongoing research using this technology in sorghum.
“AgMOOCs in Flipped Classroom”: To Promote Interactive Learning in Agricultu...apaari
Webinar on Making University Lessons More Interactive “AgMOOCs in Flipped Classroom”: To Promote Interactive Learning in Agriculture Education – by Guntuku Dileepkumar Iowa State University
Regional Workshop on Underutilized Fish and Marine Genetic Resources (FMGR) a...apaari
This document discusses Taiwan's underutilized fisheries and marine genetic resources. It provides statistics on Taiwan's fisheries production, consumption, imports, and exports. It identifies over 3,000 species of underutilized fishes, mollusks, crustaceans, and other organisms. The document outlines Taiwan's infrastructure for research including vessels and facilities. It details the budget and human resources of Taiwan's Fisheries Research Institute. Finally, it discusses strategies for conserving genetic resources and improving species such as tilapia through selective breeding and biotechnology.
Monitoring Health for the SDGs - Global Health Statistics 2024 - WHOChristina Parmionova
The 2024 World Health Statistics edition reviews more than 50 health-related indicators from the Sustainable Development Goals and WHO’s Thirteenth General Programme of Work. It also highlights the findings from the Global health estimates 2021, notably the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on life expectancy and healthy life expectancy.
Food safety, prepare for the unexpected - So what can be done in order to be ready to address food safety, food Consumers, food producers and manufacturers, food transporters, food businesses, food retailers can ...
This report explores the significance of border towns and spaces for strengthening responses to young people on the move. In particular it explores the linkages of young people to local service centres with the aim of further developing service, protection, and support strategies for migrant children in border areas across the region. The report is based on a small-scale fieldwork study in the border towns of Chipata and Katete in Zambia conducted in July 2023. Border towns and spaces provide a rich source of information about issues related to the informal or irregular movement of young people across borders, including smuggling and trafficking. They can help build a picture of the nature and scope of the type of movement young migrants undertake and also the forms of protection available to them. Border towns and spaces also provide a lens through which we can better understand the vulnerabilities of young people on the move and, critically, the strategies they use to navigate challenges and access support.
The findings in this report highlight some of the key factors shaping the experiences and vulnerabilities of young people on the move – particularly their proximity to border spaces and how this affects the risks that they face. The report describes strategies that young people on the move employ to remain below the radar of visibility to state and non-state actors due to fear of arrest, detention, and deportation while also trying to keep themselves safe and access support in border towns. These strategies of (in)visibility provide a way to protect themselves yet at the same time also heighten some of the risks young people face as their vulnerabilities are not always recognised by those who could offer support.
In this report we show that the realities and challenges of life and migration in this region and in Zambia need to be better understood for support to be strengthened and tuned to meet the specific needs of young people on the move. This includes understanding the role of state and non-state stakeholders, the impact of laws and policies and, critically, the experiences of the young people themselves. We provide recommendations for immediate action, recommendations for programming to support young people on the move in the two towns that would reduce risk for young people in this area, and recommendations for longer term policy advocacy.
United Nations World Oceans Day 2024; June 8th " Awaken new dephts".Christina Parmionova
The program will expand our perspectives and appreciation for our blue planet, build new foundations for our relationship to the ocean, and ignite a wave of action toward necessary change.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Combined Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported (IUU) Vessel List.Christina Parmionova
The best available, up-to-date information on all fishing and related vessels that appear on the illegal, unregulated, and unreported (IUU) fishing vessel lists published by Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) and related organisations. The aim of the site is to improve the effectiveness of the original IUU lists as a tool for a wide variety of stakeholders to better understand and combat illegal fishing and broader fisheries crime.
To date, the following regional organisations maintain or share lists of vessels that have been found to carry out or support IUU fishing within their own or adjacent convention areas and/or species of competence:
Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR)
Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT)
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM)
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC)
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC)
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO)
North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC)
North Pacific Fisheries Commission (NPFC)
South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO)
South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO)
Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA)
Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)
The Combined IUU Fishing Vessel List merges all these sources into one list that provides a single reference point to identify whether a vessel is currently IUU listed. Vessels that have been IUU listed in the past and subsequently delisted (for example because of a change in ownership, or because the vessel is no longer in service) are also retained on the site, so that the site contains a full historic record of IUU listed fishing vessels.
Unlike the IUU lists published on individual RFMO websites, which may update vessel details infrequently or not at all, the Combined IUU Fishing Vessel List is kept up to date with the best available information regarding changes to vessel identity, flag state, ownership, location, and operations.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Contributi dei parlamentari del PD - Contributi L. 3/2019Partito democratico
DI SEGUITO SONO PUBBLICATI, AI SENSI DELL'ART. 11 DELLA LEGGE N. 3/2019, GLI IMPORTI RICEVUTI DALL'ENTRATA IN VIGORE DELLA SUDDETTA NORMA (31/01/2019) E FINO AL MESE SOLARE ANTECEDENTE QUELLO DELLA PUBBLICAZIONE SUL PRESENTE SITO
Asia Pesticide Residue Mitigation through the Promotion of Biopesticides and Enhancement of Trade Opportunities (APRMP), Virtual lab meeting 12 August 2020
1. GLP TRAINING
Wayne Jiang, PhD
IR-4, Michigan State University, jiangwa@msu.edu
Michael Braverman, PhD
IR-4 Headquarters, Rutgers University
Sample Receipt,
Handling, and Storage
3. Q & A
Which of the following requirements is NOT
true for a laboratory Standard Operating
Procedures to comply with GLP?
(A) Approved by TFM
(B) Immediately accessible
(C) Periodically reviewed
(D) Describing QA inspection
(E) Performing non-routine maintenance
4. Q & A
Experimental termination date means :
(A) The date on which last data is collected from
the study
(B) The date when SD signs the final report
(C) The date when the archiving is completed
(D) The date when the last sample are disposed
(E) The date when the ASR is signed.
5. Q & A
Study Completion date means :
(A) The date on which last data is collected from
the study
(B) The date when SD signs the final report
(C) The date when the archiving is completed
(D) The date when the last sample are disposed
(E) The date when the ASR is signed.
6. Q & A
Which studies require Good Laboratory
Practice (GLP)? Select all correct answers.
(A) Pesticide registration
(B) PFAS contaminant monitoring
(C) Food additives
(D) Food product marketing
(E) Nonclinical safety studies of development of
drugs
7. Sample Shipping
• Frozen samples are shipped from field sites to
the Laboratory
• Samples are placed in a proper container
(plastic ice chest better)
• With appropriate temperature monitoring
• If shipped with dry ice, recommended ratio is
Sample : dry ice = 1:4
(by weight)
9. Sample Receipt
In the Laboratory:
• Sample conditions are checked upon receipt.
• Samples identified with shipping form/protocol
and logged in.
• Unique lab numbers are cross referenced to
field sample numbers.
10. Example: IR-4 Form 8B
IR-4 Field Data Book
Part 8 Residue Sample Shipping
B. Residue Sample Chain of Custody Form
11. IR-4 Form 8B
Trial Info
FRD
Lab unique
Sample ID
Sign.
Date
Check these boxes
13. • After grinding, place samples
in a freezer (shor-term)
• After dry ice sublimed, transfer
samples to a walk-in freezer
(long term)
•Record the movements
•Montor the freezer temperatures
Short-Term Storage
-20°C
Standalone
Freezer
37. Standard Form - Part 2
• For standard solution
only
- Analytical Reference Standard
Record and Use Log – Part 2.
- The % purity of the reference
standard is taken into account
when the stock solution
concentration is calculated.
38. Standard Solution Labels
• All containers of reagents
and solutions must be
labeled correctly including
chemical name,
concentration, solvent (when
used), preparation, and
expiration dates as well as
storage conditions.
• Handwriting is also
acceptable as long as all
information is included and
they are legible.
39. Reagents & Solutions
For standard, reagents, and solvents:
• Be Kept in original bottles (with exp. date)
For all solutions:
• Add adequate labeling, including
– Identity
– Concentration
– Solvent
– Storage requirements
– Expiration date
– Prepared by and prep date
41. Q & A
Which of the following requirements is NOT true for
a laboratory Standard Operating Procedures to
comply with GLP?
(A) Approved by TFM
(B) Immediately accessible
(C) Periodically reviewed
(D) Describing QA inspection
(E) Performing non-routine maintenance
42. Q & A
Experimental termination date means :
(A) The date on which last data is collected from
the study
(B) The date when SD signs the final report
(C) The date when the archiving is completed
(D) The date when the last sample are disposed
(E) The date when the ASR is signed.
43. Q & A
Study Completion date means :
(A) The date on which last data is collected from
the study
(B) The date when SD signs the final report
(C) The date when the archiving is completed
(D) The date when the last sample are disposed
(E) The date when the ASR is signed.
44. Q & A
Which studies require Good Laboratory
Practice (GLP)? Select all correct answers.
(A) Pesticide registration
(B) PFAS contaminant monitoring
(C) Food additives
(D) Food product marketing
(E) Nonclinical safety studies of development of
drugs
46. Form QA4 Revised effective 1/31/10 SOP 8.6 Rev.5 App. A
A) Study Title:____________________________________________________________
Lab I.D. Number_______________________________________________________
*Phase of the study reviewed: ____________________________________________
Inspection Date: ________________________________________________________
B) Laboratory Research Director:
Name:_________________________________________________________________
Address:_______________________________________________________________
Phone: ( )__________________________________________________________
E-mail: _______________________________________________________________
C) Regional / ARS Laboratory Research Coordinator:
Name:_________________________________________________________________
Address:_______________________________________________________________
Phone: ( )__________________________________________________________
E-mail: _______________________________________________________________
D) Quality Assurance Inspector:
Name:_________________________________________________________________
Address:_______________________________________________________________
Phone: ( )__________________________________________________________
E-mail: _______________________________________________________________
E) Study Director:________________________________________________________
E-mail: _______________________________________________________________
F) Test Site Location:______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
G) Please fill out the following checklist.
Provide a narrative on any items marked No and provide suggestions and
recommended actions to be taken as appropriate for all QA findings. Use
additional forms if needed. Study personnel must respond to QA Findings.
Please Note:
Any problems which are likely to affect the study’s integrity found during the course of the
review must be brought to the attention of the Study Director/Testing Facility Management at
IR-4 HQ immediately.
*Phase of the study is very important:
Please indicate on the line provided. Each study must have at least one phase inspection. Use
one QA review form per phase per study.
IR-4 PROJECT
Analytical In-Life Inspection
□ Circulate to TFM/SD simultaneously
Page 1 of -----
_________
47. Form QA4 Revised effective 1/31/10 SOP 8.6 Rev.5 App. A
Page 2 of ____
Analytical In-Life Inspections
ID #_________________
A. General YES NO N/A
* 1. Protocol and method available to appropriate personnel.
* 2. Discovered changes/revisions of approved protocol documented
* 3. Procedures, as listed in the protocol, being followed
* 4. Modifications to the validated method documented and approved
by the LRD and Study Director
* 5. Lab operations relating to study conducted according to SOPs.
* 6. SOPs available to lab personnel.
* 7. SOP deviations documented in raw data.
* 8. SOP deviations approved by the Study Director
* 9. Adequate number of trained personnel.
* 10. Observed procedures relating to study.
*11. Observed procedures conducted for protocol.
* Minimal GLP requirements associated with Series 860.
N/A=Not Applicable
Comments
48. Form QA4 Revised effective 1/31/10 SOP 8.6 Rev.5 App. A
Page 3 of ____
Analytical In-Life Inspections
ID #____________________
B. Equipment / Instrument YES NO N/A
*12. Equipment calibrated / standardized.
*13. Equipment cleaning / maintenance is documented.
*14. Logbooks up-to-date.
*15. SOP for equipment in place and current.
C. Samples YES NO N/A
*16. Sample is uniquely identified according to:
a. Protocol.
b. SOP.
*17. Sample ID appears on container.
*18. Sample container is identified by:
a. Test system.
b. Field I.D. Number
c. Nature of the sample
d. Date of collection / site.
e. Test substance.
*19. Samples are maintained under proper storage.
a. Sample storage located documented.
b. Temperature and maintenance records up-to-date.
*20. Sample preparation (i.e. processing, extraction, analysis, etc.) is
properly recorded.
*22. Sub samples properly identified during
a. Processing.
b. Weighing.
*22. Sample integrity maintained during preparation.
* Minimal GLP requirements associated with Series 860.
N/A=Not Applicable
Comments
49. Form QA4 Revised effective 1/31/10 SOP 8.6 Rev.5 App. A
Page 4 of ____
Analytical In-Life Inspections
ID #________________
D. Reagents, Solvents, and Solutions YES NO N/A
*23. Reagents, Solutions, Solvents are labeled:
a. Identity / concentration / storage requirements.
b. Expiration date
*24. Standard Solutions:
a. Have been prepared according to SOP/method.
b. Have been properly labeled.
I. Identity / concentration.
ii. Date prepared / prepared by (if applicable).
iii. Storage conditions / expiration date.
c. Are not out-of-date.
d. Are properly stored.
E. Recording of Data YES NO N/A
*25. Hand generated data are properly recorded.
a. Directly, promptly, legibly.
b. In indelible ink.
c. On an appropriate form or in lab raw data.
*26. Entries are dated and initialed appropriately.
*27. Analytical standards used are properly identified in raw data.
*28. Changes to raw data. Do not obscure the original entry.
a. Explained.
b. Dated.
c. Initialed.
*29. Computer generated data.
a. Program has been validated.
b. Input personnel identified.
c. Data calculation verified.
*30. Lab raw data stored according to SOP.
* Minimal GLP requirements associated with Series 860.
N/A=Not Applicable
Comments
50. Form QA4 Revised effective 1/31/10 SOP 8.6 Rev.5 App. A
Page _______ of ______
Study Title:
Study No.:___________________________ Study Dir.:
Findings/Actions
QA Findings Response/Actions Taken*
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
______________________________ ______________________________
____________________________________ ____________________________________
Quality Assurance Date Responder** Date
* - Place responses/ explanation of corrective action in space provided to the right side of the findings or
use a separate sheet of paper.
** Responder(s) are to assure they have identified themselves either by signing the bottom of this page
or by initialing and dating the written response(s).
51. Form QA4 Revised effective 1/31/10 SOP 8.6 Rev.5 App. A
Page ______ of ______
Study Title:__________________________________________________________________
Study No.: _________________________________ Study Director:
Findings, Responses and Actions Taken*:
____________________________________ ____________________________________
Quality Assurance Date Responder** Date
* - Place responses/ explanation of corrective action in space provided between findings or use a
separate sheet of paper.
** Responder(s) are to assure they have identified themselves either by signing the bottom of this page
or by initialing and dating the written response(s).