ADDRESSING THE SUBJECT
-Catherine Belsey
Catherine Belsey is a British Literary Critic
 Visiting Professor of English at the University of
Derby
 Fellow of English Association – Fellow of Learned
Society of Wales
 Her work Critical Practice (1980), an influential
post structuralist text - suggests new directions
for literary studies.
 Also wrote about the effect of romance novels on
modern soiciety
 Criticized the traditional ways of criticism
 Made a scientific analysis of the techniques and
styles of the last century
 Other major works includes :
• Desire : Love Stories in Western Culture (1980)
• Shakespeare and the Loss of Eden: The
Construction of Family Values in Early Modern
Culture (1999)
 Taken from Critical Practice
 Belsey attempts to explain the process by which a
text constructs reader as its subject
 She works from general to specific
 Introduces the concept of Lacan’s ‘mirror image’,
Saussure’s ‘language as a system’ and Althusser’s
‘ideology’.
 She draws on Althusser’s concept of ideology to
explain how a reader is fixed in a particular
ideological position within a text
 How a reader is constituted as a subject by a text
 Analyses Lacan’s theory of mirror image as a
formative of the ‘I’
 Adding insights into ‘Resistance’, and‘Desire’
 Explains about the complementary relationship
between a reader and a text on lines of
subjectivity
 A set of ideas that determines one’s goals,
expectations and actions
 The word ‘Ideology’ coined by Destutt de Tracy in
1796 by fusing ‘idea’ and ‘logy’ to mean ‘’science of
ideas’’
 Marx defined ideology as a range of representations
related to the real relationships which people live
 Ideology is not simply a set of iluusions
 Ideology can’t be defined as a whole truth. It
presents partial truths
 It is a set of omissions, gaps, rather than lies,
appears to provide answers to questions
 Ideology has no creators
 According to Althusser, ideological practises are
produced and reproduced in the institutions of
our society – Ideological State Apparatuses, ISA
 The subject is what speaks or signifies
 Traditional sense of subject was ego or self
 Subject represents the individual’s self-consiousness
and consiousness of the self
 For post-structuralism the subject is rather
secondary, constructed by the language and volatile
 Language allows an individual to refer to himself as ‘I’
and everyone except him as ‘You’
 ‘I’ has a set of beliefs and practices which is at
variance with that of ‘You’
 Within ideology the individual speaker is the
origin of the meaning of his utterence
 According to Derrida language is not aa function
of speaking subject
 It implies that subject is inscribed in the language,
that it is a function of language
 Jacques Lacan,eminent French psychoanalyst
argues that subjectivity is not acquired, but
created
 He observes at the age of six, an infant has no
sense of identity :it is not able to distinguish itself
from others
 But between the age of six and eighteen months,
children became capable of recognising their
mirror image
 The subject is not static
 After the first stage of recognition, the child enters
the ‘symbolic order’
 To be a part of social formation, a child must have
recourse to language
 The child not only identifies itself as ‘I’ , but also as
‘he’ and ‘she’, ‘son’ or ‘daughter’, according to the
subject positions it happens to be in
 Ideology has the role of constituting individuals as
subjects, because it is produced in the identification
of ‘I’ of language
 It is not easy to come out of it
 To resist ideology means to refuse act or speak
 Ideology addresses concrete individuals as subjects
 It may be possible to resist ideology in a theoretical
level with a concept of ruling ideology that is by
protesting against it
 There is a distinction between the consious
subject represented in a speech and the subject
speaks
 In the gap formed we find unconsious- in the
moment of entry into the symbolic order
 It is the consiousness which repress human beings
in obedience to the discipline imposed by
language and culture
 Unconsiousness is the only source of disruption of
the obedience
 Once the child enters the symbolic order, it
overcomes its difficulty in the pre-linguistic stage
to vent its wants
 The acquisition of lanuage helps him to phrase his
desires
 Language satisfies the child’s wish to express its
desires
 It confines the wishes to those that can be
expressed through conventions of language
 For instance when a child says it wants a rose, the
rose it has in mind may be white in colour, though
it may get red.
 The concept of subject is constantly in the process
of construction and deconstruction
 Driven by the unconsious desire the subject is
restless, dissatisfied and eager to change
 This dissatisfaction leads to the possiblity of
transformation
 A reader in a way author also
 By interpreting the signs in a text in a personal
fashion every reader creates his own versions of
the same literary text
 Every reader brings his own aspirations and
dreams in the reading of a text
 The quality of our literary experience depends not
only on the text and on what the author offers
 But also depends on the releveance of padt
experience and presnet intersets that the reader
brings in
o Interpellation
A concept used in Marxist theory
Explains how individuals are constructed as
subjects by major social and political
institutions
Propounded by Louis Althusser in his Essays
on Ideology
No texts create a determinate meaning but
by social formation
o Classic Realism
The dominant literary form of the 19th
century
Subjectivity is the major theme of Classic
Realism
Inconsistency of character or the
inappropriateness of particular actions to
particular characters is seen as a weakness of
classic realism
 Catherine Belsey streches toeards an explicitly
philosophical approach to literary theory
 She works towards a pluralistic theory of
interpretation but her work is not a post modern
work
 She yokes together linguist theories, psychoanalysis
and Marxist philosophy
 Explains the interplay between a text, reader and the
social formation
 She succeede in uniting various disciplines in
analysing the literary texts
Addressing the subject  : Catherine Belsey

Addressing the subject : Catherine Belsey

  • 2.
  • 3.
    Catherine Belsey isa British Literary Critic  Visiting Professor of English at the University of Derby  Fellow of English Association – Fellow of Learned Society of Wales  Her work Critical Practice (1980), an influential post structuralist text - suggests new directions for literary studies.  Also wrote about the effect of romance novels on modern soiciety
  • 4.
     Criticized thetraditional ways of criticism  Made a scientific analysis of the techniques and styles of the last century  Other major works includes : • Desire : Love Stories in Western Culture (1980) • Shakespeare and the Loss of Eden: The Construction of Family Values in Early Modern Culture (1999)
  • 5.
     Taken fromCritical Practice  Belsey attempts to explain the process by which a text constructs reader as its subject  She works from general to specific  Introduces the concept of Lacan’s ‘mirror image’, Saussure’s ‘language as a system’ and Althusser’s ‘ideology’.  She draws on Althusser’s concept of ideology to explain how a reader is fixed in a particular ideological position within a text
  • 6.
     How areader is constituted as a subject by a text  Analyses Lacan’s theory of mirror image as a formative of the ‘I’  Adding insights into ‘Resistance’, and‘Desire’  Explains about the complementary relationship between a reader and a text on lines of subjectivity
  • 7.
     A setof ideas that determines one’s goals, expectations and actions  The word ‘Ideology’ coined by Destutt de Tracy in 1796 by fusing ‘idea’ and ‘logy’ to mean ‘’science of ideas’’  Marx defined ideology as a range of representations related to the real relationships which people live  Ideology is not simply a set of iluusions
  • 8.
     Ideology can’tbe defined as a whole truth. It presents partial truths  It is a set of omissions, gaps, rather than lies, appears to provide answers to questions  Ideology has no creators  According to Althusser, ideological practises are produced and reproduced in the institutions of our society – Ideological State Apparatuses, ISA
  • 9.
     The subjectis what speaks or signifies  Traditional sense of subject was ego or self  Subject represents the individual’s self-consiousness and consiousness of the self  For post-structuralism the subject is rather secondary, constructed by the language and volatile  Language allows an individual to refer to himself as ‘I’ and everyone except him as ‘You’  ‘I’ has a set of beliefs and practices which is at variance with that of ‘You’
  • 10.
     Within ideologythe individual speaker is the origin of the meaning of his utterence  According to Derrida language is not aa function of speaking subject  It implies that subject is inscribed in the language, that it is a function of language
  • 11.
     Jacques Lacan,eminentFrench psychoanalyst argues that subjectivity is not acquired, but created  He observes at the age of six, an infant has no sense of identity :it is not able to distinguish itself from others  But between the age of six and eighteen months, children became capable of recognising their mirror image  The subject is not static
  • 12.
     After thefirst stage of recognition, the child enters the ‘symbolic order’  To be a part of social formation, a child must have recourse to language  The child not only identifies itself as ‘I’ , but also as ‘he’ and ‘she’, ‘son’ or ‘daughter’, according to the subject positions it happens to be in
  • 13.
     Ideology hasthe role of constituting individuals as subjects, because it is produced in the identification of ‘I’ of language  It is not easy to come out of it  To resist ideology means to refuse act or speak  Ideology addresses concrete individuals as subjects  It may be possible to resist ideology in a theoretical level with a concept of ruling ideology that is by protesting against it
  • 14.
     There isa distinction between the consious subject represented in a speech and the subject speaks  In the gap formed we find unconsious- in the moment of entry into the symbolic order  It is the consiousness which repress human beings in obedience to the discipline imposed by language and culture  Unconsiousness is the only source of disruption of the obedience
  • 15.
     Once thechild enters the symbolic order, it overcomes its difficulty in the pre-linguistic stage to vent its wants  The acquisition of lanuage helps him to phrase his desires  Language satisfies the child’s wish to express its desires  It confines the wishes to those that can be expressed through conventions of language
  • 16.
     For instancewhen a child says it wants a rose, the rose it has in mind may be white in colour, though it may get red.  The concept of subject is constantly in the process of construction and deconstruction  Driven by the unconsious desire the subject is restless, dissatisfied and eager to change  This dissatisfaction leads to the possiblity of transformation
  • 17.
     A readerin a way author also  By interpreting the signs in a text in a personal fashion every reader creates his own versions of the same literary text  Every reader brings his own aspirations and dreams in the reading of a text  The quality of our literary experience depends not only on the text and on what the author offers  But also depends on the releveance of padt experience and presnet intersets that the reader brings in
  • 18.
    o Interpellation A conceptused in Marxist theory Explains how individuals are constructed as subjects by major social and political institutions Propounded by Louis Althusser in his Essays on Ideology No texts create a determinate meaning but by social formation
  • 19.
    o Classic Realism Thedominant literary form of the 19th century Subjectivity is the major theme of Classic Realism Inconsistency of character or the inappropriateness of particular actions to particular characters is seen as a weakness of classic realism
  • 20.
     Catherine Belseystreches toeards an explicitly philosophical approach to literary theory  She works towards a pluralistic theory of interpretation but her work is not a post modern work  She yokes together linguist theories, psychoanalysis and Marxist philosophy  Explains the interplay between a text, reader and the social formation  She succeede in uniting various disciplines in analysing the literary texts