The document provides an evaluation of the student's FMP (Final Major Project) for a magazine. It summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of the student's research, planning, and time management. It then describes the aesthetic qualities and design elements included in the magazine to appeal to the target audience. Finally, it summarizes feedback received from peers, noting praise for the aesthetics and readability but also suggested areas for improvement like using a consistent theme, improving the logo and text formatting, and adding more content to some pages.

1. FMP Evaluation
Your name

2. Production Process Evaluation

3. Research
• The strengths of my research were that it helped me come up with the
layout of my magazine and different way text was formatted. It helped me
design the general layout and helped with imaging. Weakness were I could
have focused on different aspects of the magazine instead of certain ones

4. Planning
• The strengths of my planning were that I was able to understand what
design would be better for my type of magazine. It helped me decide what
format would be best to attract the readers eye and keep it following the
page.

5. Time Management
• for the time I knew I had yes. My project was completed on time but
wasn’t handed in due to me being ill. If I was at 100% I would be able to of
done extra work on it and improve it massively.

6. Aesthetic Qualities
A custom title made for
my magazine to add a
unique touch
After finding a custom font I was
able to create a theme title for
the double spread page
Adding the “next month issue” shows that the
magazine is allows checking what’s going on so it can
be trusted
Having images of the developer
and the game shows the reader
that it’s not just a bunch of
rummers
Custom barcode
which shows the
magazine is fully
committed to its
genre.

7. Audience AppealYes I’ve appealed to my target audience.
This is seen with all the different games
used which are all in the age range but not
below. Also the games used are for my
social-geographic
4 types of games
making sure every
type of audience
enjoys what I would
be provided
Using a large picture of the game make
the reader intrigued in what the game
would look like, additionally the text is in
a way the reader would be able to see the
different between heading at text

8. Peer
Feedback

9. Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– Aesthetically pleasing
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– The way the text is laid out should be in
transparent boxes

10. Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
– No blur anywhere on the magazine
– Good use of text drawing the eye of the reader
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– Better looking text in general
– Don’t mess up circles

11. Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
– Back spread of 2nd page and words easy to read
– Front page good side stories
– Easy to differentiate
• What improvements could have been made to the
product?
– Have a theme for the magazine like colour palate or
shapes.
– Need a better logo
– Need better colours for the text
– Makes sure the images aren’t touching the text
– Back page is dead, add a blurb
– Have a logo (image for the type of magazine)

12. Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
– I agree about having a theme for my magazine and
also fixing the text in general
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?
– Disagree with the circle comment

13. Peer Feedback Summary
– I would start with fixing some boxes around the
text since it would improve the visibility of the
text.
– I would also make the pictures not touch, whilst
also making sure every picture makes sense where
it has been placed
– Finally I would have a logo for my magazine to an
some unique effects