The document summarizes the student's film project evaluation in several areas: Research - The student conducted surveys and interviews to inform their horror/comedy concept. However, they could have researched layouts more for the DVD/poster. Planning - Mind maps and researching other videos helped with planning, but the student changed their plan halfway and could have planned timing better. Time Management - The student timed tasks weekly but should have written plans down and possibly spent more time on items. Peer feedback noted the poster/DVD cover were too plain but camera skills were good. The student agrees more detail was needed and will change the visuals to better represent the plot.

1. FMP
EvaluationBenjamin-Partner

2. Production Process
Evaluation

3. Research
• The strengths
• I got a lot of help for what idea I should use and I went with a mix of both horror and comedy but
with more comedy because most people said they like comedy more.
• I surveys to get answers from people and it helped me for my project because I learned what my
audience liked.
• I also interviewed a couple of my friends and got some answers that also helped me.
• and the research I got helped Make all my products
• It also helped me know what my audience likes so I can add to my work so it looks better to them.
• Weaknesses
• I should of researched the layout more of the DVD cover and the poster and maybe thought of
something more scary than a stalker

4. Planning
• Strengths
• I found things that helped me with my ideas and look at different videos of
the idea I had and used it to find data for my products
• I planned in when and what I would like I would plan to make a product for
a day and do it and I also would try and plan how long they took
• Weaknesses
• I could of planned better by not changing everything half way through the
project but I was going to do more stuff but in the end I did a video, poster
and a DVD cover.
• Mind maps I think went well but I could spent more time planning how to
do them and thinking of better things to write so I could do more stuff

5. Time Management
• Strengths
• I timed everything so I would do w things a week. So 1 and 2 the first
week, 3 and 4 the second week and then 5 and 6 the third week then did
my main project in half term and the poster and DVD cover when
returned to college.
• Weaknesses
• I maybe could of spent more time on instead of 3 days for 2 and changed
it so I just did it without 2 a week
• I should of wrote down a plan for it instead of keeping it In my head so
that I could keep track on when and how to make them.

6. Technical Qualities
SAME COLOUR BUT DIFFERENT
BACKGROUNDAND IS MORE
DETIALED.
SAME IDEA JUSTWITH NO HAND
AND IT’S A DARK.

7. Aesthetic QualitiesStrengths the writing stands out and says a
lot about what the short film will be about
and how it’s going to turn out.
The colour also shows how the short film will
go out and what genre it will be.
Weaknesses
I needed to add more detail and don’t make
it as plain.
Maybe looked for a better logo/picture
because the Skelton is a bit boring.
I also could of spent more time making it.

8. Audience Appeal
My target audience is 14-19 and I think I did
Well and got the right idea to my target
Audience.
The red and black represent sadness and
Darkness which is what some teenagers
Deal with so it’s like they can relate to the
Short film.
The title of the short film is called dark nigh
Because its about teenagers who try to
Escape their normal lives and reality it
Doesn’t get any better for them.

9. Peer
Feedback

10. Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
THE DESIGN IS UNIQUE,THE GOLD MASK ANDWRITING FITS IN
WITHTHE BLACK BACKGROUND.
• What improvements could have been made to the
product?
• IT IS REALLY PLAIN AND DOES SAY MUICH ABOUT
WHATTHEY CAN EXPECT INTHE MOVIE.

11. Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
• THE DESIGN IS ORIGINAL ANDTHETITLEON ITS SIDE FITSWELL
WITHTHE BACKGROUND.
• What improvements could have been made to the product?
• IT SHOWS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUTTHE PLOT OR
THE CHARACTERS INTHE MOVIE.

12. Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
• IT SHOWEDGOOD CAMERA SKILLWITHTHE ANGLES I USED
ANDTHE STORY LINEWAS GOOD.
• What improvements could have been made to the
product? COULD OF SPENT MORETIMETHINKING OF
WHERETO PLACE PEOPLE AND USETHE SET.

13. Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer feedback?
• I DOAGREE ITWASVERY PLAINANDTHE DETAIL IS GOOD
WITHTHEWRITING.
• What do you disagree with from your peer feedback?
• I DISAGREETHAT IT SHOWS NOTHGINGABOUTTHE PLOT

14. Peer Feedback Summary
IWOULD CHANGE
THE POSTERAND
DVD COVER AND
MAKE
THEM BETTERTO
FIT INTHE STORY
OFTHE SHORT
FILM.
A LITTLE BETTER
AND ADD MORE
DETAIL AND SO
PEOPLE
WHO SEE IT
UNDERSTAND IT
BETTER.