APPENDICITIS
Dr Phillipo Leo Chalya
M.D. (Dar); M.Med Surg (Mak)
Specialist surgeon - Bugando Medical Centre
FORMAT
 Definition
 A historical perspective
 Epidemiology
 Aetiology
 Classification
 Pathophysiology
 Clinical presentation
 Differential Diagnosis
 Work up
 Treatment
 Complications
DEFINITION
 Appendicitis refers to inflammation of the vermix
appendix
A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
 First described by Reginald Fitz in 1886 who
also was the first to advocate appendicectomy
as the cure
 In 1889 Charles McBurney described the
clinical findings of acute appendicitis including
the point of maximum tenderness in RIF which
bears his name
EPIDEMIOLOGY
 Incidence:
 The incidence is higher in developed countries and in
developing countries which are adopting a more refined
western type diet
 Incidence of appendicitis is lower in cultures with a higher
intake of dietary fiber
EPIDEMIOLOGY [cont’d]
 Mortality/Morbidity:
 The overall mortality rate of 0.2-0.8% is attributable to
complications of the disease rather than to surgical intervention
 Mortality rate rises above 20% in patients older than 70 years,
primarily because of diagnostic and therapeutic delay
 Perforation rate is higher among patients younger than 18 years
and patients older than 50 years, possibly because of delays in
diagnosis
 Appendiceal perforation is associated with an increase in
morbidity and mortality rates
EPIDEMIOLOGY [cont’d]
 Sex:
 The incidence of appendicitis is approximately 1.4 times
greater in men than in women
 The incidence of primary appendectomy is approximately
equal in both sexes
EPIDEMIOLOGY [cont’d]
 Age:
 Appendicitis may occur at all ages, but is most commonly
seen in the 2nd
and 3rd
decades of life
 The incidence of appendicitis gradually rises from birth,
peaks in the late teen years, and gradually declines in the
geriatric years
 Although rare, neonatal and even prenatal appendicitis
have been reported in literature
 The emergency physician must maintain a high index of
suspicion in all age groups
AETIOLOGY
 Etiological factors for appendicitis include:-
 Appendiceal luminal obstruction
 Diet
 Social status
 Familial susceptibility
Appendiceal luminal obstruction
 Luminal causes
 Feacolith
 Lymphoid follicle hyperplasia
 Worms e.g. ascaris
 Foreign body
 In the wall
 Stricture
 Neoplasms
 Outside the wall
 Adhesions
 kinks
Diet
 Low intake of dietary fiber is associated with
increased incidence of appendicitis
 Dietary fiber is thought to decrease the viscosity of
feces, decrease bowel transit time, and discourage
formation of fecaliths that predispose individuals to
obstructions of the appendiceal lumen
Familial tendency
 Appendicitis tends to run in certain families
may be due to peculiar position of the organ
which predisposes to infection
CLASSIFICATION
 Clinical classification
 Pathological classification
Clinical classification
 Acute appendicitis
 Subacute appendicitis
 Recurrent appendicitis
 Chronic appendicitis
Pathological classification
 Obstructive appendicitis
 Non-obstructive appendicitis
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
 Two types:-
 Obstructive appendictis
 Non-obstructive appendicitis
Obstructive appendicitis
 Luminal obstruction and mucus production result in
increased intraluminal pressure
 Bacteria trapped within the appendiceal lumen begin to
multiply, and the appendix becomes distended
 Luminal distention stimulates visceral nerve endings
concerned with pain [visceral pain]
 This produce dull aching pain felt periumbilically
according to nerve supply of the appendix (T10) 
referred pain
 Venous congestion and edema follow next, and by 12 hours
after onset, the inflammatory process may become
transmural
Obstructive appendicitis[ cont]
 Peritoneal irritation then develops
 If the obstruction is left untreated, arterial blood
flow to the appendix is compromised, and this
leads to tissue ischemia and necrosis
 This stimulates parietal nerve endings→ shift of
pain to the RIF
 Full thickness necrosis of the appendiceal wall
leads to perforation with the release of fecal and
suppurative contents into the peritoneal cavity
Obstructive appendicitis [cont]
 Depending on the duration of the disease process,
either a localized walled-off abscess or mass occurs,
or if the pathologic process has advanced rapidly, the
perforation is free in the peritoneal cavity and
generalized peritonitis occurs
 The commonest bacterial growth from inflamed
appendices include Escherichia coli, Kleblesiella
spp., Proteus spp and Bacteroids
Non-obstructive appendicitis
 This is less dangerous type
 Inflammation commences in the mucous membrane or in the
lymphoid follicles and gradually spread to the submucosa
 As there is no obstruction there is not much distension, but
when the serosa is involved localizing peritonitis develops
and the patient c/o RIF pain
 Such inflammation terminates either by:-
 Suppuration
 Gangrene
 Fibrosis
 Resolution
 Many of the sub-acute appendicitis, recurrent appendicitis
and chronic appendicitis develop from this variety
CLINICAL PRESENTATION
 History: classic symptoms include:-
 Periumbilical pain [visceral pain] which shifts and
localize to the RIF [parietal or somatic pain]
 Periumbilical pain is colicky in nature in obstructive type
and is dull aching and constant in non-obstructive type
 RIF pain is sharp intense and well localized to the RIF
 Anorexia
 Nausea & Vomiting
CLINICAL PRESENTATION [cont’d]
 Physical examination
 Pyrexia
 RIF tenderness
 Muscle guarding
 Rebound tenderness
 Special test to elicit in appendicitis
 Pointing sign
 Rovsing’s sign [RIF pain with palpation of the LIF ]
 Psoas sign [RIF tenderness with internal rotation of the flexed
right hip]
 Obtrurator sign [RLQ pain with hyperextension of the right hip ]
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
 Abdominal disorders
 Gynecological disorders
 Retroperitoneal disorders
 Thoracic disorders
 Others
Abdominal disorders
 Acute cholecytitis
 Perforated peptic ulcers
 Entecolitis
 Intestinal obstruction
 Carcinoma caecum
 Crohn’s diseases
 Amoebic colitis
 Meckel’s diverticulitis
 Acute pancreatis
Gynecological disorders
 PID
 Ectopic pregnancy ®
 Twisted ovarian cyst ®
 Ruptured ovarian follicles ®
Retroperitoneal disorders
 Right ureteric colic
 Right sided acute pyelonephritis
 Right sided testicular torsion
 Retroperitoneal haematoma
Thoracic disorders
 Basal pneumonia
 Pleurisy
Miscellaneous
 Henoch-Schoenlein purpura
 Porphyria
 Diabetic abdomen
WORK UP
 Lab investigations
 Complete blood cell count
 Leucocytosis
 Neutrophilia greater than 75%
 C-reactive protein test
 Urinalysis
WORK UP [cont’d]
 Imaging investigations
 Abdominal radiography
 The kidneys-ureters-bladder (KUB) view is typically used
 Visualization of an appendicolith in a patient with symptoms
consistent with appendicitis is highly suggestive of appendicitis,
but this occurs in fewer than 10% of cases
 The consensus in the literature is that plain radiographs are
insensitive, nonspecific, and is not cost-effective
•
WORK UP [cont’d]
 Abdominal Ultrasonography
 An outer diameter of greater than 6 mm,
noncompressibility, lack of peristalsis, or
periappendiceal fluid collection characterizes an
inflamed appendix
 The normal appendix is not visualized
 It’s noninvasive, short acquisition time, lack of
radiation exposure, and potential for diagnosis of
other causes of abdominal pain, particularly in the
subset of women of childbearing age
 However it is operator dependent
WORK UP [cont’d]
 Computed tomography
 Abdominal CT has become the most important imaging study in the
evaluation of patients with atypical presentations of appendicitis
 Advantages of CT scanning include
 Sensitivity and accuracy compared with those of other imaging
techniques
 Readily available
 Noninvasive
 potential to reveal alternative diagnoses
 Disadvantages
 lengthy acquisition time if oral contrast is used
 patient discomfort if rectal contrast is used
 Exposure to radiation
 It is really required to make diagnosis of acute appendicitis
DIAGNOSTIC SCORING SYSTEM
 Various scoring systems have been devised to aid diagnosis
of appendicitis
 Although many diagnostic scores have been advocated,
most are complex and difficult to implement in the clinical
situation
 The Alvarado score, is a simple scoring system that can be
instituted easily
 The Classic Alvarado score [1986] is based on three
symptoms, three signs and two laboratory findings and has
a total score of 10
Classic Alvarado Score [1986]
Features Score
Symptoms
 Migratory RIF pain 1
 Anorexia 1
 Nausea & vomiting 1
Signs
 Pyrexia 1
 Tenderness RIF 1
 Rebound tenderness RIF 2
Lab investigations
 Leucocytosis 2
 left shift of neutrophil maturation 1
Total 10
Diagnostic Scoring System [cont]
 Kalan et al [1994] omitted one lab parameter [left
shift of neutrophil maturation] which is not
routinely available in many laboratories, and
produced a modified score which have only one
lab findings
 A modified Alvarado score [1994] is based on three
symptoms, three signs and one laboratory findings
[total score of 9]
 MAS is commonly used
Modified Alvarado Score [1994]
Features Score
Symptoms
Migratory RIF pain
Anorexia
Nausea & vomiting
1
1
1
Signs
Pyrexia
Tenderness RIF
Rebound tenderness RIF
Lab investigation
leucocytosis
1
1
2
2
Total 9
MASS- interpretation
 A score of 1-4:[ discharging group] The diagnosis
of acute appendicitis is unlikely
 A score of 5-6: [observing group] Probable to have
appendicitis but not convincing to have urgent
appendicectomy
 A score of 7-9: [emergency group] Regarded as
probable to have acute appendicitis and needs
emergency appendicectomy
TREATMENT
 The treatment of appendicitis is appendicectomy
 Appendicectomy can be elective, emergency or
interval
 Two types of appendicectomy:-
 Conventional open appendicectomy
 Laparoscopic appendicectomy
Preoperative care
 Iv fluid
 Analgesics
 Preoperative antibiotics with broad spectrum
antibiotics
 Check Hb, blood grouping and crossmatching
 Shaving
 Written informed consent
 Pre-anaesthetic visit
Intraoperative care
 Open appendicectomy
 Incisions
 Grid-iron sss
 Rurtherford Morrison’s
 Lanz’s [transverse skin crease]
 SUMI when the diagnosis is not clear
 Rt lower paramedian
 Midline incision
Intraoperative care cont’d
 Appendiceal locations of the tip
 Retrocaecal appendix [70%]
 Pelvic appendix [25%]- the tip hangs in the pelvic brim
 Subcaecal appendix [2%]
 Splenic appendix [1%]- either pre- or post-ileal i.e anterior or
posterior to the terminal ileum
 Paracaecal appendix [1%]
 Paracolic appendix [1%]-either to the right or left of ascending
colon, the tip in the extraperitoneal tissue
 Location of the base-is constant, being found at
confluence of 3 taeniae coli of the caecum which fuse to
form the outer longitudinal muscle coat of the appendix
Post operative care
 Iv fluids
 Analgesics
 Antibiotics
 Monitor-
 Vital signs
 Discharge home in 2-3 days postoperatively
COMPLICATIONS
 Complications of acute appendicitis
 Postoperative complications
i. Complications of acute appendicitis
 Appendicular mass
 Appendicular abscess
 Recurrent appendicitis
 Perforation peritonitis
Treatment of complications
 Appendicular abscess
 Appendicular mass
 Peritonitis
 Recurrent appendicitis
a.Appendicular mass
 Use conservative Ochsner-Sherren regime
 Iv fluid
 NGT
 Analgesics
 Antibiotics –parenteral
 Mark the limits of the mass on the abdominal wall
using a skin pencil
 Monitor- vital sign, size of the mass, input/output chart
 Clinical improvement is expected in 24-48 hours
Appendicular mass [cont]
 Criteria for stoping OSR
 Increased pulse rate
 Increasing or spreading abdominal pain
 Increasing the size of the mass
 Vomiting or increasing gastric contents
b.Appendicular Abscess
 I & D
 Antibiotics
c.Recurrent appendicitis
 Elective appendicectomy
ii.Postoperative complications
 Wound infections
 Intrabdominal abscess
 Paralytic ileus
 Feacal fistula
 Adhesive intestinal obstruction
 Portal pyaemia due to septicemia in the portal venous
system
 Respiratory complications
 DVT embolism
 RIH due to damage to iliopogastric / ilioinguinal
nerves
 Incisional hernia
03. appendicitis dr phillip bmc
03. appendicitis dr phillip bmc

03. appendicitis dr phillip bmc

  • 1.
    APPENDICITIS Dr Phillipo LeoChalya M.D. (Dar); M.Med Surg (Mak) Specialist surgeon - Bugando Medical Centre
  • 2.
    FORMAT  Definition  Ahistorical perspective  Epidemiology  Aetiology  Classification  Pathophysiology  Clinical presentation  Differential Diagnosis  Work up  Treatment  Complications
  • 3.
    DEFINITION  Appendicitis refersto inflammation of the vermix appendix
  • 4.
    A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE First described by Reginald Fitz in 1886 who also was the first to advocate appendicectomy as the cure  In 1889 Charles McBurney described the clinical findings of acute appendicitis including the point of maximum tenderness in RIF which bears his name
  • 5.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY  Incidence:  Theincidence is higher in developed countries and in developing countries which are adopting a more refined western type diet  Incidence of appendicitis is lower in cultures with a higher intake of dietary fiber
  • 6.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY [cont’d]  Mortality/Morbidity: The overall mortality rate of 0.2-0.8% is attributable to complications of the disease rather than to surgical intervention  Mortality rate rises above 20% in patients older than 70 years, primarily because of diagnostic and therapeutic delay  Perforation rate is higher among patients younger than 18 years and patients older than 50 years, possibly because of delays in diagnosis  Appendiceal perforation is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality rates
  • 7.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY [cont’d]  Sex: The incidence of appendicitis is approximately 1.4 times greater in men than in women  The incidence of primary appendectomy is approximately equal in both sexes
  • 8.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY [cont’d]  Age: Appendicitis may occur at all ages, but is most commonly seen in the 2nd and 3rd decades of life  The incidence of appendicitis gradually rises from birth, peaks in the late teen years, and gradually declines in the geriatric years  Although rare, neonatal and even prenatal appendicitis have been reported in literature  The emergency physician must maintain a high index of suspicion in all age groups
  • 9.
    AETIOLOGY  Etiological factorsfor appendicitis include:-  Appendiceal luminal obstruction  Diet  Social status  Familial susceptibility
  • 10.
    Appendiceal luminal obstruction Luminal causes  Feacolith  Lymphoid follicle hyperplasia  Worms e.g. ascaris  Foreign body  In the wall  Stricture  Neoplasms  Outside the wall  Adhesions  kinks
  • 11.
    Diet  Low intakeof dietary fiber is associated with increased incidence of appendicitis  Dietary fiber is thought to decrease the viscosity of feces, decrease bowel transit time, and discourage formation of fecaliths that predispose individuals to obstructions of the appendiceal lumen
  • 12.
    Familial tendency  Appendicitistends to run in certain families may be due to peculiar position of the organ which predisposes to infection
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Clinical classification  Acuteappendicitis  Subacute appendicitis  Recurrent appendicitis  Chronic appendicitis
  • 15.
    Pathological classification  Obstructiveappendicitis  Non-obstructive appendicitis
  • 16.
    PATHOPHYSIOLOGY  Two types:- Obstructive appendictis  Non-obstructive appendicitis
  • 17.
    Obstructive appendicitis  Luminalobstruction and mucus production result in increased intraluminal pressure  Bacteria trapped within the appendiceal lumen begin to multiply, and the appendix becomes distended  Luminal distention stimulates visceral nerve endings concerned with pain [visceral pain]  This produce dull aching pain felt periumbilically according to nerve supply of the appendix (T10)  referred pain  Venous congestion and edema follow next, and by 12 hours after onset, the inflammatory process may become transmural
  • 18.
    Obstructive appendicitis[ cont] Peritoneal irritation then develops  If the obstruction is left untreated, arterial blood flow to the appendix is compromised, and this leads to tissue ischemia and necrosis  This stimulates parietal nerve endings→ shift of pain to the RIF  Full thickness necrosis of the appendiceal wall leads to perforation with the release of fecal and suppurative contents into the peritoneal cavity
  • 19.
    Obstructive appendicitis [cont] Depending on the duration of the disease process, either a localized walled-off abscess or mass occurs, or if the pathologic process has advanced rapidly, the perforation is free in the peritoneal cavity and generalized peritonitis occurs  The commonest bacterial growth from inflamed appendices include Escherichia coli, Kleblesiella spp., Proteus spp and Bacteroids
  • 20.
    Non-obstructive appendicitis  Thisis less dangerous type  Inflammation commences in the mucous membrane or in the lymphoid follicles and gradually spread to the submucosa  As there is no obstruction there is not much distension, but when the serosa is involved localizing peritonitis develops and the patient c/o RIF pain  Such inflammation terminates either by:-  Suppuration  Gangrene  Fibrosis  Resolution  Many of the sub-acute appendicitis, recurrent appendicitis and chronic appendicitis develop from this variety
  • 21.
    CLINICAL PRESENTATION  History:classic symptoms include:-  Periumbilical pain [visceral pain] which shifts and localize to the RIF [parietal or somatic pain]  Periumbilical pain is colicky in nature in obstructive type and is dull aching and constant in non-obstructive type  RIF pain is sharp intense and well localized to the RIF  Anorexia  Nausea & Vomiting
  • 22.
    CLINICAL PRESENTATION [cont’d] Physical examination  Pyrexia  RIF tenderness  Muscle guarding  Rebound tenderness  Special test to elicit in appendicitis  Pointing sign  Rovsing’s sign [RIF pain with palpation of the LIF ]  Psoas sign [RIF tenderness with internal rotation of the flexed right hip]  Obtrurator sign [RLQ pain with hyperextension of the right hip ]
  • 23.
    DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS  Abdominaldisorders  Gynecological disorders  Retroperitoneal disorders  Thoracic disorders  Others
  • 24.
    Abdominal disorders  Acutecholecytitis  Perforated peptic ulcers  Entecolitis  Intestinal obstruction  Carcinoma caecum  Crohn’s diseases  Amoebic colitis  Meckel’s diverticulitis  Acute pancreatis
  • 25.
    Gynecological disorders  PID Ectopic pregnancy ®  Twisted ovarian cyst ®  Ruptured ovarian follicles ®
  • 26.
    Retroperitoneal disorders  Rightureteric colic  Right sided acute pyelonephritis  Right sided testicular torsion  Retroperitoneal haematoma
  • 27.
    Thoracic disorders  Basalpneumonia  Pleurisy
  • 28.
  • 29.
    WORK UP  Labinvestigations  Complete blood cell count  Leucocytosis  Neutrophilia greater than 75%  C-reactive protein test  Urinalysis
  • 30.
    WORK UP [cont’d] Imaging investigations  Abdominal radiography  The kidneys-ureters-bladder (KUB) view is typically used  Visualization of an appendicolith in a patient with symptoms consistent with appendicitis is highly suggestive of appendicitis, but this occurs in fewer than 10% of cases  The consensus in the literature is that plain radiographs are insensitive, nonspecific, and is not cost-effective •
  • 31.
    WORK UP [cont’d] Abdominal Ultrasonography  An outer diameter of greater than 6 mm, noncompressibility, lack of peristalsis, or periappendiceal fluid collection characterizes an inflamed appendix  The normal appendix is not visualized  It’s noninvasive, short acquisition time, lack of radiation exposure, and potential for diagnosis of other causes of abdominal pain, particularly in the subset of women of childbearing age  However it is operator dependent
  • 32.
    WORK UP [cont’d] Computed tomography  Abdominal CT has become the most important imaging study in the evaluation of patients with atypical presentations of appendicitis  Advantages of CT scanning include  Sensitivity and accuracy compared with those of other imaging techniques  Readily available  Noninvasive  potential to reveal alternative diagnoses  Disadvantages  lengthy acquisition time if oral contrast is used  patient discomfort if rectal contrast is used  Exposure to radiation  It is really required to make diagnosis of acute appendicitis
  • 33.
    DIAGNOSTIC SCORING SYSTEM Various scoring systems have been devised to aid diagnosis of appendicitis  Although many diagnostic scores have been advocated, most are complex and difficult to implement in the clinical situation  The Alvarado score, is a simple scoring system that can be instituted easily  The Classic Alvarado score [1986] is based on three symptoms, three signs and two laboratory findings and has a total score of 10
  • 34.
    Classic Alvarado Score[1986] Features Score Symptoms  Migratory RIF pain 1  Anorexia 1  Nausea & vomiting 1 Signs  Pyrexia 1  Tenderness RIF 1  Rebound tenderness RIF 2 Lab investigations  Leucocytosis 2  left shift of neutrophil maturation 1 Total 10
  • 35.
    Diagnostic Scoring System[cont]  Kalan et al [1994] omitted one lab parameter [left shift of neutrophil maturation] which is not routinely available in many laboratories, and produced a modified score which have only one lab findings  A modified Alvarado score [1994] is based on three symptoms, three signs and one laboratory findings [total score of 9]  MAS is commonly used
  • 36.
    Modified Alvarado Score[1994] Features Score Symptoms Migratory RIF pain Anorexia Nausea & vomiting 1 1 1 Signs Pyrexia Tenderness RIF Rebound tenderness RIF Lab investigation leucocytosis 1 1 2 2 Total 9
  • 37.
    MASS- interpretation  Ascore of 1-4:[ discharging group] The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is unlikely  A score of 5-6: [observing group] Probable to have appendicitis but not convincing to have urgent appendicectomy  A score of 7-9: [emergency group] Regarded as probable to have acute appendicitis and needs emergency appendicectomy
  • 38.
    TREATMENT  The treatmentof appendicitis is appendicectomy  Appendicectomy can be elective, emergency or interval  Two types of appendicectomy:-  Conventional open appendicectomy  Laparoscopic appendicectomy
  • 39.
    Preoperative care  Ivfluid  Analgesics  Preoperative antibiotics with broad spectrum antibiotics  Check Hb, blood grouping and crossmatching  Shaving  Written informed consent  Pre-anaesthetic visit
  • 40.
    Intraoperative care  Openappendicectomy  Incisions  Grid-iron sss  Rurtherford Morrison’s  Lanz’s [transverse skin crease]  SUMI when the diagnosis is not clear  Rt lower paramedian  Midline incision
  • 41.
    Intraoperative care cont’d Appendiceal locations of the tip  Retrocaecal appendix [70%]  Pelvic appendix [25%]- the tip hangs in the pelvic brim  Subcaecal appendix [2%]  Splenic appendix [1%]- either pre- or post-ileal i.e anterior or posterior to the terminal ileum  Paracaecal appendix [1%]  Paracolic appendix [1%]-either to the right or left of ascending colon, the tip in the extraperitoneal tissue  Location of the base-is constant, being found at confluence of 3 taeniae coli of the caecum which fuse to form the outer longitudinal muscle coat of the appendix
  • 42.
    Post operative care Iv fluids  Analgesics  Antibiotics  Monitor-  Vital signs  Discharge home in 2-3 days postoperatively
  • 43.
    COMPLICATIONS  Complications ofacute appendicitis  Postoperative complications
  • 44.
    i. Complications ofacute appendicitis  Appendicular mass  Appendicular abscess  Recurrent appendicitis  Perforation peritonitis
  • 45.
    Treatment of complications Appendicular abscess  Appendicular mass  Peritonitis  Recurrent appendicitis
  • 46.
    a.Appendicular mass  Useconservative Ochsner-Sherren regime  Iv fluid  NGT  Analgesics  Antibiotics –parenteral  Mark the limits of the mass on the abdominal wall using a skin pencil  Monitor- vital sign, size of the mass, input/output chart  Clinical improvement is expected in 24-48 hours
  • 47.
    Appendicular mass [cont] Criteria for stoping OSR  Increased pulse rate  Increasing or spreading abdominal pain  Increasing the size of the mass  Vomiting or increasing gastric contents
  • 48.
    b.Appendicular Abscess  I& D  Antibiotics
  • 49.
  • 50.
    ii.Postoperative complications  Woundinfections  Intrabdominal abscess  Paralytic ileus  Feacal fistula  Adhesive intestinal obstruction  Portal pyaemia due to septicemia in the portal venous system  Respiratory complications  DVT embolism  RIH due to damage to iliopogastric / ilioinguinal nerves  Incisional hernia