APPENDICITIS
BY: Dr BIENFAIT MUMBERE VAHWERE
LECTURER/ KIU SURGERY DPT
FEB, 2024
OUTLINE
• DEFINITION
• INTRODUCTION
• EPIDEMIOLOGY
• PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
• CLINICAL MANIFESTATION
• CLASSIFICATIONS
• DIAGNOSIS
• MANAGEMENT
• COMPLICATIONS
DEFINITION
• APPENDIX VERMIFORM: The appendix is a
finger-shaped pouch that sticks out from the
colon on the lower right side of the abdomen.
• APPENDICITIS: is the inflammation of the
appendix
HISTORIQUE PERSPECTIVE
• 1736: The first appendectomy was
performed by AMYAND
• 1886: The word “appendicitis” was
introduced by REGINALD FITZ
• 1899: MC BURNEY, described the clinical
manifestation of early appendicitis,
including the point of maximum tenderness
in the R.I.F.
INTRODUCTION
• Appendicitis is one of the most common cause of
acute abdomen world wide with a life risk 8.6 %
in males and 6.9% in females
• For over a century, open appendectomy was the
only standard treatment for appendicitis.
• Contemporary management of appendicitis is
laparoscopic appendectomy
• treat uncomplicated appendicitis nonoperatively
with antibiotics alone.
EMBRYOLOGY
• First becomes visible in the eighth week of
embryologic development as a protuberance
off the terminal portion of the cecum.
• During both antenatal and postnatal
development, the growth rate of the cecum
exceeds that of the appendix, displacing the
appendix medially toward the ileocecal valve
ANATOMY
• Small blind-ending, muscular tube at the meeting
point of the 3 taenia coli, just distal to the I. C.
junction.
• located in the right lower section of the abdomen.
• The average length is 7.5-10cm(2-20cm)
• The normal lumen (< 6mm): , irregular, being
encroached by multiple longitudinal folds of M.M.
• Blood supply: app. A. I. C. A
• Venous drainage: app. V. I.C.V.
• Lymphatic vessels: 4,6,more I.Caecal. L.Ns.
ABA-The Appendix- 4th
year Lectures
Normal position of appendix
Exceptions exist in the classic presentation due to
anatomic variability of the appendix
EPIDEMIOLOGY
• Most common acute surgical condition of the
abdomen
• Peak incidence in early adulthood
• 7-10% of population develop acute appendicitis
• More in males 1.3-2 : 1
• Mortality is 0.3to 0.85% but in elderly it is >20%
• Despite newer imaging techniques, acute
appendicitis can be very difficult to diagnose.
ETIOLOGY
• Luminal obstruction.
• Lymphoid hyperplasia 60%
• Faecolith 35%.
• Inspissated barium.
• Fruit seeds. }<4%
• Worms. < 1%
• Extra-luminal obstruction eg Ca Cecum
• Raised intra-luminal pressure
• Mucus accumulation
• Multiplication of bacteria.
• ( E.Coli, Bacteroids, peptostreptococcus, Psuedomonas)
• Venous and lymphoid congestion and.
etio
• STRICTURE (fibrosis, Crohn’s disease )
• FOREIGN BODY
• NEOPLASM: ca. of caecum, carcinoid synd.
• PARASITES:oxyuris vermicularis (pin warm
• INFECTION:
- bacterial proliferation within the appendix
- mixed growth of aerobic & anaerobic
(E.coli 85%, Enterococi 30%, Bacteroids, Cl. Welchi)
• RACE &DIET: The incidence is lowest in societies with high
dietary fiber intake.
• SOCIAL STATUS: more common among the upper & middle class
CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION
• ACUTE APPENDICITIS
• SUBACUTE APPENDICITIS
• RECURENT APPENDICITIS
• CHRONIC APPENDICITIS
PATHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION
• OBSTRCUCTIVE
• NON OBSTRUCTIVE
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
• Acute appendicitis is thought to begin with
obstruction of the lumen
• Obstruction can result from food matter,
adhesions, or lymphoid hyperplasia
• Mucosal secretions continue to increase
intraluminal pressure
• Eventually the pressure exceeds capillary
perfusion pressure and venous and lymphatic
drainage are obstructed.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY…cont.
• With vascular compromise, epithelial mucosa
breakdown and bacterial invasion by bowel
flora occurs.
• Increased pressure also leads to arterial stasis
and tissue infarction
• End result is perforation and spillage of
infected appendiceal contents into the
peritoneum
CLOSED LOOP OBSTRUCTION (fecalith, foreign body, etc.)
DISTENTION (Mucosal secretion, bacteria....)
INFECTION, EDEMA
INFARCTION (gangrene, perforation.)
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
• NONE OBSTRUCTIVE APPENDICITIS
• Inflammation start from the mucosa membrane
but no obstruction, less distention but if serosa is
involved patient develop local peritonitis and
hence pain in the RIF
• This inflammation can lead to: suppuration, or
gangrene, perforation or resolution
• Subacute, recurrent and chronic peritonitis
results from this none obstructive type
Pictorial Explanation
Appendiceal
obstruction/early
appendicitis – visceral
peritoneal irritation
Appendiceal distension Irritation of parietal
peritoneum (localised)
Perforation,
localised/generalised
peritonitis, mass
obstruction
Distention
mucus
Distention
causing
Ischemia
Gangrene
EPIDEMIOLOGY
• Incidence of appendicitis is higher in developed
countries due to consumption of low fiber diet
• Incidence of appendicitis is lower in cultures
with higher fiber diet is intake
• Peak incidence in early adulthood
• 7-10% of population develop acute appendicitis
• More in males 1.3-2 : 1
Clinical Manifestations
• PAIN- dull, vague, Epigastric or peri-umblical, for 6-12 hrs. then
• shifts to the right lower quadrant.
• ANOREXIA ( constant c.feature > 90%, children)
• NAUSEA and
• INFREQUENT VOMİTING (1or 2 episodes,75%).
• Constipation, occasionally diarrhea
• Often, H.O. similar discomfort that settled spontaneousl
• Family H. ( up to 1/3rd
of children)
Atypical presentation:
• Pain , predominantly somatic/ visceral,&
poorly localized (elderly).
• R.L.Q.
• L.L.Q long app., infl. tip in the L.L.Q.
• Flank/ back: retroperitoneal app.
• Supra-pubic: pelvic
Clinical SIGNS
• Appears uncomfortable,
• Activity: quiet
• Position: frequently shifting position(flexed hip)
• Vital signs:
In the 1st
6 hrs., rare alteration in temp. & P.R. (normal)
• Slight pyrexia (37.2- 37.7°C ) + P.R. to 80 or 90/min.
• 39-40°C: perforation/ gangrene, then if shock ensue.
• > 40°C- abscess, septicemia, infection in C.N.S, Lungs,
U.T.I.
Clinical SIGNS
• Muscle guarding
• Localized tenderness in the R.L.Q. (Maximal at the Mc
Burney’s p.)
• Rebound tenderness
• Cutaneous hyperasthesia
• Rovsing Sign
• Iliopsoas Sign
• Obturator Sign
• Rectal exam. : extreme anterior pelvic tenderness
Psoas Sign Pain on extension of the rt. thigh
Obturator Sign;
“Pain on flexion and rotation
MANTRELS Score(Alvarado)
Established in 1986 for Murphy.
• Migration of pain:1
• Anorexia: 1
• Nausea / vomiting: 1
• Tenderness RLQ: 1
• Rebound: 2
• Elevated temp:1
• Leukocytosis:2
• Shift to left(Neutrophilia):1
ALVARADO SCORE
Total score:10
Score 8-10: acute appendicitis=> Appendectomy
Score 6-8: possibility of appendicitis(need for
Abd USS or CT Scan for confirmation
Score <6: less likely appendicitis
Atypical Presentations
Most common in:
• – elderly
• – children
• – pregnancy
HIGH RISK PATIENTS, CONT'D
• Pregnancy
– Most common surgical emergency in pregnancy
– Mortality rate if missed = 2 % for mother, up to 35
% for fetus
– WBC elevated in pregnancy
– Appendix changes location
HIGH RISK PATIENTS, CONT'D.
• Pediatrics
– Most common surgical disorder in kids
– Accounts for 5 % of abd. pain visits
– Up to 50 % initially misdiagnosed
• < 2 yrs. : perforation rate approaches 100 %
• 3 to 5 yrs. = 71 %
• 6 to 10 yrs. = 40 %
– Most common misdiagnosis is AGE
– Sequence of pain and vomiting may be helpful
– Localized tenderness not a feature of AGE
HIGH RISK PATIENTS, CONT'D.
• Elderly
– Vital signs and exam may not reflect severity
– > age 60 : only 5 to 10 % diagnosed without delay
– Perforation rate = 46 to 83 %
– RLQ tenderness absent in 23 %
– N/V, anorexia less common
– Leukocytosis less pronounced
– Only 20 % classic presentation
HIGH RISK PATIENTS
• Ovulating women
– PID, TOA, ovarian cyst rupture can mimic
appendicitis
– Look for cervical motion tenderness, adnexal
tenderness, history of STD’s
– Can have CMT with pelvic appendix
HIGH RISK PATIENTS, CONT'D.
Immunocompromised
– HIV, chronic steroids, sickle cell anemia,
chemotherapy, DM, dialysis
– Increased risk of complications and misdiagnosis
• Inflammatory response decreased
INVESTIGATIONS
• CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS
IS IRREFUTABLE, NO INVESTIGATION CAN
REPLACE IT
LABORATORY STUDIES
• FBC
– 75 to 85 % have elevated WBC, but it is
nonspecific
– WBC normal in 80 % in the first 24 hrs.
– WBC usually 12 to 18,000 in appendicitis
• Chemistry panel
– May help with diagnosis of dehydration
•
IMAGING STUDIES
• Plain films
– Low sensitivity and specificity
– Appendicolith specific, but seen in only 2 %
– May see local air-fluid levels, psoas obliteration, soft tissue
mass, gas in appendix : all nonspecific
• Ultrasound
– 75 to 90 % sensitive, 86 to 100 % specific
– Noninvasive, low cost, but operator-dependent
– Good for diagnosing GYN disorders
USS
CT SCAN
– Early studies showed low yield, but helical CT much more
accurate
– Sensitivity 97 to 100 %, specificity 95 % (similar no matter
what type or whether contrast is used)
– Often shows alternative diagnosis
– More expensive, radiation exposure
Criteria for appendicitis :
• Diameter > 6 mm
• Failure to completely fill with contrast or air
• Appendicolith
• Wall thickening or enhancement
– Other contributory signs include fat stranding, fluid,
inflammatory mass, adenopathy
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES
Systemic
• Diabetic ketoacidosis
• Henoch-Schonlein
purpura
Pulmonary
• Pleuritis
• Pneumonia (basilar)
• Pulmonary infarction
Genitourinary
• Kidney stone
• Pyelonephritis
• Wilms' tumor
Other
• Parasitic infection
• Psoas abscess
• Rectus sheath hematoma
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES
Gastrointestinal
•Cholecystitis
•Crohn's disease
•Duodenal ulcer perforate
•Gastroenteritis
•Pancreatitis
•Meckel's diverticulitis
•Mesenteric lymphadenitis
•Necrotizing enterocolitis
•Neoplasm (carcinoid,
carcinoma, lymphoma)
Gynecologic
•Ectopic pregnancy
•Endometriosis
•Ovarian torsion
•Pelvic inflammatory
disease
•Ruptured ovarian cyst
•Tubo-ovarian abscess
TREATMENT
The goal of the surgical approach
An early diagnosis with resection of an acutely
inflamed appendix prior to perforation,
A minimum of negative appendectomies.
• Appendectomy is the standard of care
• Patients should be NPO, given IVF, and preoperative
antibiotics
• Antibiotics are most effective when given preoperatively
and they decrease post-op infections and abscess
formation
MANAGEMENT
• Pre-operative treatment
• Operation
• post operative treatment
• Treatment of complications
Problems encountered during appendectomy
• A normal appendix is found. This demands careful exclusion of other
possible diagnoses, particularly terminal ileitis, Meckel’s diverticulitis and
tubal or ovarian causes in women. It is usual to remove the appendix to
avoid future diagnostic difficulties, even though the appendix is
macroscopically normal
• The appendix cannot be found. The caecum should be mobilised, and the
taeniae coli should be traced to their confluence on the caecum before the
diagnosis of ‘absent appendix’ is made.
• An appendicular tumour is found. Small tumours (under 2.0 cm in diameter)
can be removed by appendicectomy; larger tumours should be treated by a
right hemicolectomy
• An appendicular tumour is found. Small tumours (under 2.0 cm in
diameter) can be removed by appendicectomy;mlarger tumours
should be treated by a right hemicolectomy
Management of an appendix mass
• If an appendix mass is present and the condition of
the patient is satisfactory, the standard treatment is
the conservative
• This strategy is based on the premise that the
inflammatory process is already localised and that
inadvertent surgery is difficult and may be
dangerous.
• Give antibiotics and anti inflammatory and then do
interval appendicectomy after 4 to 6 weeks
PRE-OPERATIVE TREATMENT
• Pain…Analgenic?.Important:Only after
diagnosis
• Antibiotics
• Fluids
• Preparation: Skin, NGT, Urine Catheter
• Consent
OPERATIVE TREATMENT
• Transverse Rocky-Davis or the classical McBurney
or midline skin incision is made in the abdomen
over the area of maximal tenderness.
• If purulent or cloudy peritoneal fluid is
encountered, it should be sent for culture and
sensitivity.
• The appendix is identified at the confluence of the
taeniae coli, and the mesoappendix is clamped and
divided.
APPENDECTOMY PROCEDURE
These involve:
-Open appendectomy – an incision is made through the
skin, the underlying tissue and the abdominal wall in
order to access the appendix.
-Laparoscopic (‘keyhole’) appendectomy – this involves
making three small incisions in the abdomen, through
which particular instruments are inserted. A gas is gently
pumped into the abdominal cavity to separate the
abdominal wall from the organs. This makes it easier to
examine the appendix and internal organs.
COMPLICATIONS
• Perforation
• Abscess and mass formation
• Liver abscess
• Gen.peritonitis
• Septicemia
Appendicular abscess
• Incision and dreinage
• antibiotics
• Appendicectomy if possible otherwise
• Skin of surgical site should be left opened
• Interval appendicectomy
operative complications
• – infection
• – hemorrhage
• – damage to other organs
• – ileus
• – adhesions
SUMMURY
• If diagnosis of appendicitis is clear from history and
physical examination no further testing is needed
• When diagnosis of appendicitis is uncertain CT &
ultrasonography may reduce the rate of
perforation and are cost effective
• CT is a better imaging modality for appendicitis
than ultrasonography
• Be aware of other imaging modalities especially
MRI in inconclusive
● ultrasonography or MRI in pregnant females

APPENDICITIS DR BIENFAIT246578+89788.pptx

  • 1.
    APPENDICITIS BY: Dr BIENFAITMUMBERE VAHWERE LECTURER/ KIU SURGERY DPT FEB, 2024
  • 2.
    OUTLINE • DEFINITION • INTRODUCTION •EPIDEMIOLOGY • PATHOPHYSIOLOGY • CLINICAL MANIFESTATION • CLASSIFICATIONS • DIAGNOSIS • MANAGEMENT • COMPLICATIONS
  • 3.
    DEFINITION • APPENDIX VERMIFORM:The appendix is a finger-shaped pouch that sticks out from the colon on the lower right side of the abdomen. • APPENDICITIS: is the inflammation of the appendix
  • 4.
    HISTORIQUE PERSPECTIVE • 1736:The first appendectomy was performed by AMYAND • 1886: The word “appendicitis” was introduced by REGINALD FITZ • 1899: MC BURNEY, described the clinical manifestation of early appendicitis, including the point of maximum tenderness in the R.I.F.
  • 5.
    INTRODUCTION • Appendicitis isone of the most common cause of acute abdomen world wide with a life risk 8.6 % in males and 6.9% in females • For over a century, open appendectomy was the only standard treatment for appendicitis. • Contemporary management of appendicitis is laparoscopic appendectomy • treat uncomplicated appendicitis nonoperatively with antibiotics alone.
  • 6.
    EMBRYOLOGY • First becomesvisible in the eighth week of embryologic development as a protuberance off the terminal portion of the cecum. • During both antenatal and postnatal development, the growth rate of the cecum exceeds that of the appendix, displacing the appendix medially toward the ileocecal valve
  • 7.
    ANATOMY • Small blind-ending,muscular tube at the meeting point of the 3 taenia coli, just distal to the I. C. junction. • located in the right lower section of the abdomen. • The average length is 7.5-10cm(2-20cm) • The normal lumen (< 6mm): , irregular, being encroached by multiple longitudinal folds of M.M. • Blood supply: app. A. I. C. A • Venous drainage: app. V. I.C.V. • Lymphatic vessels: 4,6,more I.Caecal. L.Ns.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Exceptions exist inthe classic presentation due to anatomic variability of the appendix
  • 11.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY • Most commonacute surgical condition of the abdomen • Peak incidence in early adulthood • 7-10% of population develop acute appendicitis • More in males 1.3-2 : 1 • Mortality is 0.3to 0.85% but in elderly it is >20% • Despite newer imaging techniques, acute appendicitis can be very difficult to diagnose.
  • 12.
    ETIOLOGY • Luminal obstruction. •Lymphoid hyperplasia 60% • Faecolith 35%. • Inspissated barium. • Fruit seeds. }<4% • Worms. < 1% • Extra-luminal obstruction eg Ca Cecum • Raised intra-luminal pressure • Mucus accumulation • Multiplication of bacteria. • ( E.Coli, Bacteroids, peptostreptococcus, Psuedomonas) • Venous and lymphoid congestion and.
  • 13.
    etio • STRICTURE (fibrosis,Crohn’s disease ) • FOREIGN BODY • NEOPLASM: ca. of caecum, carcinoid synd. • PARASITES:oxyuris vermicularis (pin warm • INFECTION: - bacterial proliferation within the appendix - mixed growth of aerobic & anaerobic (E.coli 85%, Enterococi 30%, Bacteroids, Cl. Welchi) • RACE &DIET: The incidence is lowest in societies with high dietary fiber intake. • SOCIAL STATUS: more common among the upper & middle class
  • 14.
    CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION • ACUTEAPPENDICITIS • SUBACUTE APPENDICITIS • RECURENT APPENDICITIS • CHRONIC APPENDICITIS
  • 15.
  • 16.
    PATHOPHYSIOLOGY • Acute appendicitisis thought to begin with obstruction of the lumen • Obstruction can result from food matter, adhesions, or lymphoid hyperplasia • Mucosal secretions continue to increase intraluminal pressure • Eventually the pressure exceeds capillary perfusion pressure and venous and lymphatic drainage are obstructed.
  • 17.
    PATHOPHYSIOLOGY…cont. • With vascularcompromise, epithelial mucosa breakdown and bacterial invasion by bowel flora occurs. • Increased pressure also leads to arterial stasis and tissue infarction • End result is perforation and spillage of infected appendiceal contents into the peritoneum
  • 18.
    CLOSED LOOP OBSTRUCTION(fecalith, foreign body, etc.) DISTENTION (Mucosal secretion, bacteria....) INFECTION, EDEMA INFARCTION (gangrene, perforation.) PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
  • 19.
    PATHOPHYSIOLOGY • NONE OBSTRUCTIVEAPPENDICITIS • Inflammation start from the mucosa membrane but no obstruction, less distention but if serosa is involved patient develop local peritonitis and hence pain in the RIF • This inflammation can lead to: suppuration, or gangrene, perforation or resolution • Subacute, recurrent and chronic peritonitis results from this none obstructive type
  • 20.
    Pictorial Explanation Appendiceal obstruction/early appendicitis –visceral peritoneal irritation Appendiceal distension Irritation of parietal peritoneum (localised) Perforation, localised/generalised peritonitis, mass obstruction Distention mucus Distention causing Ischemia Gangrene
  • 21.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY • Incidence ofappendicitis is higher in developed countries due to consumption of low fiber diet • Incidence of appendicitis is lower in cultures with higher fiber diet is intake • Peak incidence in early adulthood • 7-10% of population develop acute appendicitis • More in males 1.3-2 : 1
  • 22.
    Clinical Manifestations • PAIN-dull, vague, Epigastric or peri-umblical, for 6-12 hrs. then • shifts to the right lower quadrant. • ANOREXIA ( constant c.feature > 90%, children) • NAUSEA and • INFREQUENT VOMİTING (1or 2 episodes,75%). • Constipation, occasionally diarrhea • Often, H.O. similar discomfort that settled spontaneousl • Family H. ( up to 1/3rd of children)
  • 23.
    Atypical presentation: • Pain, predominantly somatic/ visceral,& poorly localized (elderly). • R.L.Q. • L.L.Q long app., infl. tip in the L.L.Q. • Flank/ back: retroperitoneal app. • Supra-pubic: pelvic
  • 24.
    Clinical SIGNS • Appearsuncomfortable, • Activity: quiet • Position: frequently shifting position(flexed hip) • Vital signs: In the 1st 6 hrs., rare alteration in temp. & P.R. (normal) • Slight pyrexia (37.2- 37.7°C ) + P.R. to 80 or 90/min. • 39-40°C: perforation/ gangrene, then if shock ensue. • > 40°C- abscess, septicemia, infection in C.N.S, Lungs, U.T.I.
  • 25.
    Clinical SIGNS • Muscleguarding • Localized tenderness in the R.L.Q. (Maximal at the Mc Burney’s p.) • Rebound tenderness • Cutaneous hyperasthesia • Rovsing Sign • Iliopsoas Sign • Obturator Sign • Rectal exam. : extreme anterior pelvic tenderness
  • 26.
    Psoas Sign Painon extension of the rt. thigh
  • 27.
    Obturator Sign; “Pain onflexion and rotation
  • 28.
    MANTRELS Score(Alvarado) Established in1986 for Murphy. • Migration of pain:1 • Anorexia: 1 • Nausea / vomiting: 1 • Tenderness RLQ: 1 • Rebound: 2 • Elevated temp:1 • Leukocytosis:2 • Shift to left(Neutrophilia):1
  • 29.
    ALVARADO SCORE Total score:10 Score8-10: acute appendicitis=> Appendectomy Score 6-8: possibility of appendicitis(need for Abd USS or CT Scan for confirmation Score <6: less likely appendicitis
  • 30.
    Atypical Presentations Most commonin: • – elderly • – children • – pregnancy
  • 31.
    HIGH RISK PATIENTS,CONT'D • Pregnancy – Most common surgical emergency in pregnancy – Mortality rate if missed = 2 % for mother, up to 35 % for fetus – WBC elevated in pregnancy – Appendix changes location
  • 32.
    HIGH RISK PATIENTS,CONT'D. • Pediatrics – Most common surgical disorder in kids – Accounts for 5 % of abd. pain visits – Up to 50 % initially misdiagnosed • < 2 yrs. : perforation rate approaches 100 % • 3 to 5 yrs. = 71 % • 6 to 10 yrs. = 40 % – Most common misdiagnosis is AGE – Sequence of pain and vomiting may be helpful – Localized tenderness not a feature of AGE
  • 33.
    HIGH RISK PATIENTS,CONT'D. • Elderly – Vital signs and exam may not reflect severity – > age 60 : only 5 to 10 % diagnosed without delay – Perforation rate = 46 to 83 % – RLQ tenderness absent in 23 % – N/V, anorexia less common – Leukocytosis less pronounced – Only 20 % classic presentation
  • 34.
    HIGH RISK PATIENTS •Ovulating women – PID, TOA, ovarian cyst rupture can mimic appendicitis – Look for cervical motion tenderness, adnexal tenderness, history of STD’s – Can have CMT with pelvic appendix
  • 35.
    HIGH RISK PATIENTS,CONT'D. Immunocompromised – HIV, chronic steroids, sickle cell anemia, chemotherapy, DM, dialysis – Increased risk of complications and misdiagnosis • Inflammatory response decreased
  • 36.
    INVESTIGATIONS • CLINICAL DIAGNOSISOF ACUTE APPENDICITIS IS IRREFUTABLE, NO INVESTIGATION CAN REPLACE IT
  • 37.
    LABORATORY STUDIES • FBC –75 to 85 % have elevated WBC, but it is nonspecific – WBC normal in 80 % in the first 24 hrs. – WBC usually 12 to 18,000 in appendicitis • Chemistry panel – May help with diagnosis of dehydration •
  • 38.
    IMAGING STUDIES • Plainfilms – Low sensitivity and specificity – Appendicolith specific, but seen in only 2 % – May see local air-fluid levels, psoas obliteration, soft tissue mass, gas in appendix : all nonspecific • Ultrasound – 75 to 90 % sensitive, 86 to 100 % specific – Noninvasive, low cost, but operator-dependent – Good for diagnosing GYN disorders
  • 39.
  • 40.
    CT SCAN – Earlystudies showed low yield, but helical CT much more accurate – Sensitivity 97 to 100 %, specificity 95 % (similar no matter what type or whether contrast is used) – Often shows alternative diagnosis – More expensive, radiation exposure Criteria for appendicitis : • Diameter > 6 mm • Failure to completely fill with contrast or air • Appendicolith • Wall thickening or enhancement – Other contributory signs include fat stranding, fluid, inflammatory mass, adenopathy
  • 41.
    DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES Systemic • Diabeticketoacidosis • Henoch-Schonlein purpura Pulmonary • Pleuritis • Pneumonia (basilar) • Pulmonary infarction Genitourinary • Kidney stone • Pyelonephritis • Wilms' tumor Other • Parasitic infection • Psoas abscess • Rectus sheath hematoma
  • 42.
    DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES Gastrointestinal •Cholecystitis •Crohn's disease •Duodenalulcer perforate •Gastroenteritis •Pancreatitis •Meckel's diverticulitis •Mesenteric lymphadenitis •Necrotizing enterocolitis •Neoplasm (carcinoid, carcinoma, lymphoma) Gynecologic •Ectopic pregnancy •Endometriosis •Ovarian torsion •Pelvic inflammatory disease •Ruptured ovarian cyst •Tubo-ovarian abscess
  • 43.
    TREATMENT The goal ofthe surgical approach An early diagnosis with resection of an acutely inflamed appendix prior to perforation, A minimum of negative appendectomies. • Appendectomy is the standard of care • Patients should be NPO, given IVF, and preoperative antibiotics • Antibiotics are most effective when given preoperatively and they decrease post-op infections and abscess formation
  • 44.
    MANAGEMENT • Pre-operative treatment •Operation • post operative treatment • Treatment of complications
  • 45.
    Problems encountered duringappendectomy • A normal appendix is found. This demands careful exclusion of other possible diagnoses, particularly terminal ileitis, Meckel’s diverticulitis and tubal or ovarian causes in women. It is usual to remove the appendix to avoid future diagnostic difficulties, even though the appendix is macroscopically normal • The appendix cannot be found. The caecum should be mobilised, and the taeniae coli should be traced to their confluence on the caecum before the diagnosis of ‘absent appendix’ is made. • An appendicular tumour is found. Small tumours (under 2.0 cm in diameter) can be removed by appendicectomy; larger tumours should be treated by a right hemicolectomy • An appendicular tumour is found. Small tumours (under 2.0 cm in diameter) can be removed by appendicectomy;mlarger tumours should be treated by a right hemicolectomy
  • 46.
    Management of anappendix mass • If an appendix mass is present and the condition of the patient is satisfactory, the standard treatment is the conservative • This strategy is based on the premise that the inflammatory process is already localised and that inadvertent surgery is difficult and may be dangerous. • Give antibiotics and anti inflammatory and then do interval appendicectomy after 4 to 6 weeks
  • 47.
    PRE-OPERATIVE TREATMENT • Pain…Analgenic?.Important:Onlyafter diagnosis • Antibiotics • Fluids • Preparation: Skin, NGT, Urine Catheter • Consent
  • 48.
    OPERATIVE TREATMENT • TransverseRocky-Davis or the classical McBurney or midline skin incision is made in the abdomen over the area of maximal tenderness. • If purulent or cloudy peritoneal fluid is encountered, it should be sent for culture and sensitivity. • The appendix is identified at the confluence of the taeniae coli, and the mesoappendix is clamped and divided.
  • 49.
    APPENDECTOMY PROCEDURE These involve: -Openappendectomy – an incision is made through the skin, the underlying tissue and the abdominal wall in order to access the appendix. -Laparoscopic (‘keyhole’) appendectomy – this involves making three small incisions in the abdomen, through which particular instruments are inserted. A gas is gently pumped into the abdominal cavity to separate the abdominal wall from the organs. This makes it easier to examine the appendix and internal organs.
  • 50.
    COMPLICATIONS • Perforation • Abscessand mass formation • Liver abscess • Gen.peritonitis • Septicemia
  • 51.
    Appendicular abscess • Incisionand dreinage • antibiotics • Appendicectomy if possible otherwise • Skin of surgical site should be left opened • Interval appendicectomy
  • 52.
    operative complications • –infection • – hemorrhage • – damage to other organs • – ileus • – adhesions
  • 53.
    SUMMURY • If diagnosisof appendicitis is clear from history and physical examination no further testing is needed • When diagnosis of appendicitis is uncertain CT & ultrasonography may reduce the rate of perforation and are cost effective • CT is a better imaging modality for appendicitis than ultrasonography • Be aware of other imaging modalities especially MRI in inconclusive ● ultrasonography or MRI in pregnant females