SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
© 2014 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of
ARTBA.
Highlights from FHWA’s 2013 National Bridge Inventory Data:
 Of the 27,015 bridges in the state, 2,242 bridges, or 8% are classified as structurally deficient.
This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or
substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
 There are 4,405 bridges, or 16% of all state bridges, classified as functionally obsolete. This
means the bridge does not meet design standards that are in line with current practice.
 Federal-aid investment in Ohio has supported $3.6 billion in bridge construction spending on
4,093 bridges between 2003 and 2012, according to FHWA data.2
 Since 2004, 2,687 new bridges have been constructed in the state and 1,343 bridges have
undergone major reconstruction.
 The state estimates that it would cost approximately $6.2 billion to fix a total of 1,505 bridges in
the state.3
Bridge Inventory:
All Bridges Structurally deficient Bridges
Type of Bridge Total
Number
Area (sq.
meters)
Daily
Crossings
Total
Number
Area (sq.
meters)
Daily
Crossings
Rural Bridges
Interstate 854 916,267 17,250,327 29 19,713 640,730
Other principal arterial 1,390 1,146,246 10,611,125 34 18,941 222,753
Minor arterial 909 419,051 4,414,243 28 8,787 139,820
Major collector 3,811 1,286,891 8,905,702 242 64,602 550,756
Minor collector 3,009 560,679 2,797,444 299 43,726 188,223
Local 10,559 1,748,617 7,511,179 1,153 143,612 660,648
Urban Bridges
Interstate 1,347 2,563,885 69,025,181 47 139,767 2,028,119
Other freeway 776 1,131,059 17,260,730 17 66,685 360,611
Principal arterial 903 1,292,243 14,356,487 56 131,130 1,060,106
Minor arterial 1,083 1,091,671 11,840,836 84 106,287 1,323,374
Collector 994 665,496 6,866,748 85 52,183 567,470
Local 1,380 589,091 4,300,807 168 61,888 268,502
Not classified 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 27,015 13,400,000 175,140,809 2,242 857,323 8,011,112
1
According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck,
superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for
structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed
condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section
loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2
ARTBA analysis of FHWA data, includes all bridge construction related spending on projects approved by FHWA between 2003 and 2012.
3
This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement
and Rehabilitation Program. However, for some states this amount is very low and likely not an accurate reflection of current costs.
State Bridge Profile
Ohio
© 2014 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of
ARTBA.
Proposed bridge work:
Type of Work Number Cost (millions) Daily Crossings Area (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 886 $637.4 1,000,173 146,187
Widening & rehabilitation 122 $768.0 632,992 110,466
Rehabilitation 262 $2,531.1 1,501,291 289,968
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 114 $806.1 2,420,730 195,814
Other work 121 $1,438.9 842,243 84,944
Top 10 Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State
County Year
Built
Daily
Crossings
Type of Bridge Location
(route/water under the bridge, traffic on the bridge and location)
Licking 1940 300,087 Urban minor
arterial
CEMETERY RUN, N BUENA VISTA ST, BUENA VISTA CEMETERY
RUN
Cuyahoga 1968 144,240 Urban Interstate I490-RAMP-ES&I90-1463R(W, I-71, 1.36 MI. N. OF JCT. US-42
Franklin 1973 139,740 Urban Interstate OVER FISHER RD, I 70, 0.83 MI W OF IR670
Cuyahoga 1959 132,090 Urban Interstate CUY. RIV VALLEY-RTA45, I-90, .57 MI. E. OF JCT. I-71
Franklin 1971 122,640 Urban Interstate IR 70, RAMP TO 270NB, 0.20 MI E OF I-270
Franklin 1963 112,980 Urban Interstate RAMP I670 EB TO I71NB, I-71, 0.24 MI E OF SR3
Summit 1961 112,688 Urban Interstate OVER BROWN ST CR-652, I-76, 0.26 MI W OF SR 8
Cuyahoga 1953 98,104 Urban Interstate ABANDONED INDUSTRIAL DR, I-77, .78 MI. S. OF JCT. SR-14
Cuyahoga 1976 81,910 Urban Interstate CUY RVR&SR17&CANAL RD&CS, I-77, .41 MI. N. OF JCT. I-480
Hamilton 1931 70,604 Urban other
principal arterial
WESTERN HILLS VIADUCT, WESTERN HILLS VIAD, WEST OF I-75
WHV INTERCHG
Sources: All data is from the 2013 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in March 2014.
Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as
part of the data and have been adjusted to 2013$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state
and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other
contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total
in this profile.

More Related Content

What's hot

Kentucky State Bridge Profile
Kentucky State Bridge ProfileKentucky State Bridge Profile
Kentucky State Bridge Profileartba
 
Maine State Bridge Profile
Maine State Bridge ProfileMaine State Bridge Profile
Maine State Bridge Profileartba
 
Connecticut State Bridge Profile
Connecticut State Bridge ProfileConnecticut State Bridge Profile
Connecticut State Bridge Profileartba
 
Arkansas State Bridge Profile
Arkansas State Bridge ProfileArkansas State Bridge Profile
Arkansas State Bridge Profileartba
 
Minnesota State Bridge Profile
Minnesota State Bridge ProfileMinnesota State Bridge Profile
Minnesota State Bridge Profileartba
 
West Virginia State Bridge Profile
West Virginia State Bridge ProfileWest Virginia State Bridge Profile
West Virginia State Bridge Profileartba
 
Illinois State Bridge Profile
Illinois State Bridge ProfileIllinois State Bridge Profile
Illinois State Bridge Profileartba
 
Vermont State Bridge Profile
Vermont State Bridge ProfileVermont State Bridge Profile
Vermont State Bridge Profileartba
 
Wisconsin State Bridge Profile
Wisconsin State Bridge ProfileWisconsin State Bridge Profile
Wisconsin State Bridge Profileartba
 
Missouri State Bridge Profile
Missouri State Bridge ProfileMissouri State Bridge Profile
Missouri State Bridge Profileartba
 
State Bridge Profile New York 2014
State Bridge Profile New York 2014State Bridge Profile New York 2014
State Bridge Profile New York 2014artba
 
Tennessee State Bridge Profile
Tennessee State Bridge ProfileTennessee State Bridge Profile
Tennessee State Bridge Profileartba
 
Iowa State Bridge Profile
Iowa State Bridge ProfileIowa State Bridge Profile
Iowa State Bridge Profileartba
 
DC State Bridge Profile
DC State Bridge ProfileDC State Bridge Profile
DC State Bridge Profileartba
 
Oklahoma State Bridge Profile
Oklahoma State Bridge ProfileOklahoma State Bridge Profile
Oklahoma State Bridge Profileartba
 
Massachusetts State Bridge Profile
Massachusetts State Bridge ProfileMassachusetts State Bridge Profile
Massachusetts State Bridge Profileartba
 
South Dakota State Bridge Profile
South Dakota State Bridge ProfileSouth Dakota State Bridge Profile
South Dakota State Bridge Profileartba
 
New Hampshire State Bridge Profile
New Hampshire State Bridge ProfileNew Hampshire State Bridge Profile
New Hampshire State Bridge Profileartba
 
Maryland State Bridge Profile
Maryland State Bridge ProfileMaryland State Bridge Profile
Maryland State Bridge Profileartba
 
Oregon State Bridge Profile
Oregon State Bridge ProfileOregon State Bridge Profile
Oregon State Bridge Profileartba
 

What's hot (20)

Kentucky State Bridge Profile
Kentucky State Bridge ProfileKentucky State Bridge Profile
Kentucky State Bridge Profile
 
Maine State Bridge Profile
Maine State Bridge ProfileMaine State Bridge Profile
Maine State Bridge Profile
 
Connecticut State Bridge Profile
Connecticut State Bridge ProfileConnecticut State Bridge Profile
Connecticut State Bridge Profile
 
Arkansas State Bridge Profile
Arkansas State Bridge ProfileArkansas State Bridge Profile
Arkansas State Bridge Profile
 
Minnesota State Bridge Profile
Minnesota State Bridge ProfileMinnesota State Bridge Profile
Minnesota State Bridge Profile
 
West Virginia State Bridge Profile
West Virginia State Bridge ProfileWest Virginia State Bridge Profile
West Virginia State Bridge Profile
 
Illinois State Bridge Profile
Illinois State Bridge ProfileIllinois State Bridge Profile
Illinois State Bridge Profile
 
Vermont State Bridge Profile
Vermont State Bridge ProfileVermont State Bridge Profile
Vermont State Bridge Profile
 
Wisconsin State Bridge Profile
Wisconsin State Bridge ProfileWisconsin State Bridge Profile
Wisconsin State Bridge Profile
 
Missouri State Bridge Profile
Missouri State Bridge ProfileMissouri State Bridge Profile
Missouri State Bridge Profile
 
State Bridge Profile New York 2014
State Bridge Profile New York 2014State Bridge Profile New York 2014
State Bridge Profile New York 2014
 
Tennessee State Bridge Profile
Tennessee State Bridge ProfileTennessee State Bridge Profile
Tennessee State Bridge Profile
 
Iowa State Bridge Profile
Iowa State Bridge ProfileIowa State Bridge Profile
Iowa State Bridge Profile
 
DC State Bridge Profile
DC State Bridge ProfileDC State Bridge Profile
DC State Bridge Profile
 
Oklahoma State Bridge Profile
Oklahoma State Bridge ProfileOklahoma State Bridge Profile
Oklahoma State Bridge Profile
 
Massachusetts State Bridge Profile
Massachusetts State Bridge ProfileMassachusetts State Bridge Profile
Massachusetts State Bridge Profile
 
South Dakota State Bridge Profile
South Dakota State Bridge ProfileSouth Dakota State Bridge Profile
South Dakota State Bridge Profile
 
New Hampshire State Bridge Profile
New Hampshire State Bridge ProfileNew Hampshire State Bridge Profile
New Hampshire State Bridge Profile
 
Maryland State Bridge Profile
Maryland State Bridge ProfileMaryland State Bridge Profile
Maryland State Bridge Profile
 
Oregon State Bridge Profile
Oregon State Bridge ProfileOregon State Bridge Profile
Oregon State Bridge Profile
 

Similar to Ohio's Structurally Deficient Bridges

New Mexico State Bridge Profile
New Mexico State Bridge ProfileNew Mexico State Bridge Profile
New Mexico State Bridge Profileartba
 
State Bridge Profile California 2014
State Bridge Profile California 2014State Bridge Profile California 2014
State Bridge Profile California 2014artba
 
South Carolina State Bridge Profile
South Carolina State Bridge ProfileSouth Carolina State Bridge Profile
South Carolina State Bridge Profileartba
 
Nebraska State Bridge Profile
Nebraska State Bridge ProfileNebraska State Bridge Profile
Nebraska State Bridge Profileartba
 
North Carolina State Bridge Profile
North Carolina State Bridge ProfileNorth Carolina State Bridge Profile
North Carolina State Bridge Profileartba
 
Colorado State Bridge Profile
Colorado State Bridge ProfileColorado State Bridge Profile
Colorado State Bridge Profileartba
 
Mississippi State Bridge Profile
Mississippi State Bridge ProfileMississippi State Bridge Profile
Mississippi State Bridge Profileartba
 
State Bridge Profile Colorado 2014
State Bridge Profile Colorado 2014State Bridge Profile Colorado 2014
State Bridge Profile Colorado 2014artba
 
State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014
State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014
State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014artba
 
State Bridge Profile South Carolina 2014
State Bridge Profile South Carolina 2014State Bridge Profile South Carolina 2014
State Bridge Profile South Carolina 2014artba
 
State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014
State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014
State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014artba
 

Similar to Ohio's Structurally Deficient Bridges (11)

New Mexico State Bridge Profile
New Mexico State Bridge ProfileNew Mexico State Bridge Profile
New Mexico State Bridge Profile
 
State Bridge Profile California 2014
State Bridge Profile California 2014State Bridge Profile California 2014
State Bridge Profile California 2014
 
South Carolina State Bridge Profile
South Carolina State Bridge ProfileSouth Carolina State Bridge Profile
South Carolina State Bridge Profile
 
Nebraska State Bridge Profile
Nebraska State Bridge ProfileNebraska State Bridge Profile
Nebraska State Bridge Profile
 
North Carolina State Bridge Profile
North Carolina State Bridge ProfileNorth Carolina State Bridge Profile
North Carolina State Bridge Profile
 
Colorado State Bridge Profile
Colorado State Bridge ProfileColorado State Bridge Profile
Colorado State Bridge Profile
 
Mississippi State Bridge Profile
Mississippi State Bridge ProfileMississippi State Bridge Profile
Mississippi State Bridge Profile
 
State Bridge Profile Colorado 2014
State Bridge Profile Colorado 2014State Bridge Profile Colorado 2014
State Bridge Profile Colorado 2014
 
State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014
State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014
State Bridge Profile Ohio 2014
 
State Bridge Profile South Carolina 2014
State Bridge Profile South Carolina 2014State Bridge Profile South Carolina 2014
State Bridge Profile South Carolina 2014
 
State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014
State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014
State Bridge Profile Michigan 2014
 

More from artba

2017 media kit
2017 media kit2017 media kit
2017 media kitartba
 
September October tb_2016
September October tb_2016September October tb_2016
September October tb_2016artba
 
Transportation Builder July/August 2016
Transportation Builder July/August 2016Transportation Builder July/August 2016
Transportation Builder July/August 2016artba
 
The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016
The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016
The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016artba
 
ARTBA 2016 National Convention Program
ARTBA 2016 National Convention ProgramARTBA 2016 National Convention Program
ARTBA 2016 National Convention Programartba
 
May/June Transportation Builder
May/June Transportation BuilderMay/June Transportation Builder
May/June Transportation Builderartba
 
Northeastern regional meeting
Northeastern regional meetingNortheastern regional meeting
Northeastern regional meetingartba
 
Southern regional meeting
Southern regional meetingSouthern regional meeting
Southern regional meetingartba
 
Central regional meeting
Central regional meetingCentral regional meeting
Central regional meetingartba
 
Western regional meeting
Western regional meetingWestern regional meeting
Western regional meetingartba
 
Western regional meeting
Western regional meetingWestern regional meeting
Western regional meetingartba
 
July/August 2015 TB magazine
July/August 2015 TB magazineJuly/August 2015 TB magazine
July/August 2015 TB magazineartba
 
September/October 2015 TB magazine
September/October 2015 TB magazineSeptember/October 2015 TB magazine
September/October 2015 TB magazineartba
 
November/December 2015 TB
November/December 2015 TBNovember/December 2015 TB
November/December 2015 TBartba
 
January/February 2016 TB
January/February 2016 TBJanuary/February 2016 TB
January/February 2016 TBartba
 
March/April 2016 TB
March/April 2016 TBMarch/April 2016 TB
March/April 2016 TBartba
 
2016 ­ARTBA FIP Schedule
2016 ­ARTBA FIP Schedule2016 ­ARTBA FIP Schedule
2016 ­ARTBA FIP Scheduleartba
 
2016 ARTBA FIP Program
2016 ARTBA FIP Program2016 ARTBA FIP Program
2016 ARTBA FIP Programartba
 
2016 ILDP Agenda
2016 ILDP Agenda2016 ILDP Agenda
2016 ILDP Agendaartba
 
P3 Agenda 2016
P3 Agenda 2016P3 Agenda 2016
P3 Agenda 2016artba
 

More from artba (20)

2017 media kit
2017 media kit2017 media kit
2017 media kit
 
September October tb_2016
September October tb_2016September October tb_2016
September October tb_2016
 
Transportation Builder July/August 2016
Transportation Builder July/August 2016Transportation Builder July/August 2016
Transportation Builder July/August 2016
 
The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016
The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016
The National Work Zone Management Conference Agenda 2016
 
ARTBA 2016 National Convention Program
ARTBA 2016 National Convention ProgramARTBA 2016 National Convention Program
ARTBA 2016 National Convention Program
 
May/June Transportation Builder
May/June Transportation BuilderMay/June Transportation Builder
May/June Transportation Builder
 
Northeastern regional meeting
Northeastern regional meetingNortheastern regional meeting
Northeastern regional meeting
 
Southern regional meeting
Southern regional meetingSouthern regional meeting
Southern regional meeting
 
Central regional meeting
Central regional meetingCentral regional meeting
Central regional meeting
 
Western regional meeting
Western regional meetingWestern regional meeting
Western regional meeting
 
Western regional meeting
Western regional meetingWestern regional meeting
Western regional meeting
 
July/August 2015 TB magazine
July/August 2015 TB magazineJuly/August 2015 TB magazine
July/August 2015 TB magazine
 
September/October 2015 TB magazine
September/October 2015 TB magazineSeptember/October 2015 TB magazine
September/October 2015 TB magazine
 
November/December 2015 TB
November/December 2015 TBNovember/December 2015 TB
November/December 2015 TB
 
January/February 2016 TB
January/February 2016 TBJanuary/February 2016 TB
January/February 2016 TB
 
March/April 2016 TB
March/April 2016 TBMarch/April 2016 TB
March/April 2016 TB
 
2016 ­ARTBA FIP Schedule
2016 ­ARTBA FIP Schedule2016 ­ARTBA FIP Schedule
2016 ­ARTBA FIP Schedule
 
2016 ARTBA FIP Program
2016 ARTBA FIP Program2016 ARTBA FIP Program
2016 ARTBA FIP Program
 
2016 ILDP Agenda
2016 ILDP Agenda2016 ILDP Agenda
2016 ILDP Agenda
 
P3 Agenda 2016
P3 Agenda 2016P3 Agenda 2016
P3 Agenda 2016
 

Ohio's Structurally Deficient Bridges

  • 1. © 2014 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of ARTBA. Highlights from FHWA’s 2013 National Bridge Inventory Data:  Of the 27,015 bridges in the state, 2,242 bridges, or 8% are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1  There are 4,405 bridges, or 16% of all state bridges, classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards that are in line with current practice.  Federal-aid investment in Ohio has supported $3.6 billion in bridge construction spending on 4,093 bridges between 2003 and 2012, according to FHWA data.2  Since 2004, 2,687 new bridges have been constructed in the state and 1,343 bridges have undergone major reconstruction.  The state estimates that it would cost approximately $6.2 billion to fix a total of 1,505 bridges in the state.3 Bridge Inventory: All Bridges Structurally deficient Bridges Type of Bridge Total Number Area (sq. meters) Daily Crossings Total Number Area (sq. meters) Daily Crossings Rural Bridges Interstate 854 916,267 17,250,327 29 19,713 640,730 Other principal arterial 1,390 1,146,246 10,611,125 34 18,941 222,753 Minor arterial 909 419,051 4,414,243 28 8,787 139,820 Major collector 3,811 1,286,891 8,905,702 242 64,602 550,756 Minor collector 3,009 560,679 2,797,444 299 43,726 188,223 Local 10,559 1,748,617 7,511,179 1,153 143,612 660,648 Urban Bridges Interstate 1,347 2,563,885 69,025,181 47 139,767 2,028,119 Other freeway 776 1,131,059 17,260,730 17 66,685 360,611 Principal arterial 903 1,292,243 14,356,487 56 131,130 1,060,106 Minor arterial 1,083 1,091,671 11,840,836 84 106,287 1,323,374 Collector 994 665,496 6,866,748 85 52,183 567,470 Local 1,380 589,091 4,300,807 168 61,888 268,502 Not classified 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 27,015 13,400,000 175,140,809 2,242 857,323 8,011,112 1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour. 2 ARTBA analysis of FHWA data, includes all bridge construction related spending on projects approved by FHWA between 2003 and 2012. 3 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. However, for some states this amount is very low and likely not an accurate reflection of current costs. State Bridge Profile Ohio
  • 2. © 2014 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of ARTBA. Proposed bridge work: Type of Work Number Cost (millions) Daily Crossings Area (sq. meters) Bridge replacement 886 $637.4 1,000,173 146,187 Widening & rehabilitation 122 $768.0 632,992 110,466 Rehabilitation 262 $2,531.1 1,501,291 289,968 Deck rehabilitation/replacement 114 $806.1 2,420,730 195,814 Other work 121 $1,438.9 842,243 84,944 Top 10 Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location (route/water under the bridge, traffic on the bridge and location) Licking 1940 300,087 Urban minor arterial CEMETERY RUN, N BUENA VISTA ST, BUENA VISTA CEMETERY RUN Cuyahoga 1968 144,240 Urban Interstate I490-RAMP-ES&I90-1463R(W, I-71, 1.36 MI. N. OF JCT. US-42 Franklin 1973 139,740 Urban Interstate OVER FISHER RD, I 70, 0.83 MI W OF IR670 Cuyahoga 1959 132,090 Urban Interstate CUY. RIV VALLEY-RTA45, I-90, .57 MI. E. OF JCT. I-71 Franklin 1971 122,640 Urban Interstate IR 70, RAMP TO 270NB, 0.20 MI E OF I-270 Franklin 1963 112,980 Urban Interstate RAMP I670 EB TO I71NB, I-71, 0.24 MI E OF SR3 Summit 1961 112,688 Urban Interstate OVER BROWN ST CR-652, I-76, 0.26 MI W OF SR 8 Cuyahoga 1953 98,104 Urban Interstate ABANDONED INDUSTRIAL DR, I-77, .78 MI. S. OF JCT. SR-14 Cuyahoga 1976 81,910 Urban Interstate CUY RVR&SR17&CANAL RD&CS, I-77, .41 MI. N. OF JCT. I-480 Hamilton 1931 70,604 Urban other principal arterial WESTERN HILLS VIADUCT, WESTERN HILLS VIAD, WEST OF I-75 WHV INTERCHG Sources: All data is from the 2013 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in March 2014. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2013$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.