© 2014 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of
ARTBA.
Highlights from FHWA’s 2013 National Bridge Inventory Data:
 Of the 17,044 bridges in the state, 2,274 bridges, or 13% are classified as structurally deficient.
This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or
substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
 There are 1,362 bridges, or 8% of all state bridges, classified as functionally obsolete. This
means the bridge does not meet design standards that are in line with current practice.
 Federal-aid investment in Mississippi has supported $1.4 billion in bridge construction spending
on 966 bridges between 2003 and 2012, according to FHWA data.2
 Since 2004, 1,926 new bridges have been constructed in the state and 98 bridges have
undergone major reconstruction.
 The state estimates that it would cost approximately $3.3 billion to fix a total of 7,328 bridges in
the state.3
Bridge Inventory:
All Bridges Structurally deficient Bridges
Type of Bridge Total
Number
Area (sq.
meters)
Daily
Crossings
Total
Number
Area (sq.
meters)
Daily
Crossings
Rural Bridges
Interstate 477 653,628 6,922,960 2 494 63,000
Other principal arterial 1,404 1,659,720 8,255,141 26 35,247 147,000
Minor arterial 1,368 888,705 4,476,616 59 33,474 153,330
Major collector 3,902 1,537,783 4,504,341 390 121,915 379,520
Minor collector 837 289,874 713,328 59 14,310 17,719
Local 7,383 1,633,905 1,525,924 1,633 223,604 164,973
Urban Bridges
Interstate 298 671,945 8,892,050 1 66,698 29,400
Other freeway 108 192,126 1,418,750 1 1,416 7,500
Principal arterial 381 907,093 5,160,444 12 6,889 111,200
Minor arterial 209 171,087 1,539,447 16 3,636 73,975
Collector 293 117,793 1,010,361 24 3,920 64,162
Local 384 99,720 433,621 51 8,041 25,511
Not classified 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 17,044 8,823,379 44,852,983 2,274 519,646 1,237,290
1
According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck,
superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for
structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed
condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section
loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2
ARTBA analysis of FHWA data, includes all bridge construction related spending on projects approved by FHWA between 2003 and 2012.
3
This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement
and Rehabilitation Program. However, for some states this amount is very low and likely not an accurate reflection of current costs.
State Bridge Profile
Mississippi
© 2014 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of
ARTBA.
Proposed bridge work:
Type of Work Number Cost (millions) Daily Crossings Area (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement 4,823 $2,724.9 6,179,795 1,366,865
Widening & rehabilitation 1,237 $400.8 7,990,325 783,164
Rehabilitation 814 $89.2 694,745 187,850
Deck rehabilitation/replacement 117 $22.7 217,675 34,497
Other work 337 $57.1 467,499 124,838
Top 10 Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State
County Year
Built
Daily
Crossings
Type of Bridge Location
(route/water under the bridge, traffic on the bridge and location)
Jackson 1977 49,000 Rural Interstate STREAM, I 10, 1.4 MI E SR 63
Warren 1973 29,400 Urban Interstate MISSISSIPPI RIVER, I 20, MISS/LA STATE LINE
Covington 1964 21,000 Rural arterial UNNAMED STREAM, US 49, 0.7 MI N SR 35
Harrison 1938 17,500 Urban other
principal arterial
FLAT BRANCH, US 49, 3.2 MI N I 10
Pearl River 1948 15,000 Urban other
principal arterial
HOBOLOCHITTO CREEK, US 11, 0.3 MI S SR 43 NORTH
Hinds 1950 14,000 Urban other
principal arterial
TOWN CREEK, MONUMENT ST, SEC 4 T 5N R 1E
Tate 1959 14,000 Rural Interstate SR 306, I 55, I 55 OVER SR 306
Sunflower 1933 11,000 Rural arterial SUNFLOWER RIVER, US 82, 3.9 MI E US 49W
Harrison 1938 11,000 Rural arterial LITTLE BILOXI RIVER, US 49, 6.4 MI N I 10
Prentiss 1934 11,000 Urban other
principal arterial
KINGS CREEK, SR 145, 0.4 MI N SR 4
Sources: All data is from the 2013 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in March 2014.
Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as
part of the data and have been adjusted to 2013$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state
and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other
contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total
in this profile.

Mississippi State Bridge Profile

  • 1.
    © 2014 TheAmerican Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of ARTBA. Highlights from FHWA’s 2013 National Bridge Inventory Data:  Of the 17,044 bridges in the state, 2,274 bridges, or 13% are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1  There are 1,362 bridges, or 8% of all state bridges, classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards that are in line with current practice.  Federal-aid investment in Mississippi has supported $1.4 billion in bridge construction spending on 966 bridges between 2003 and 2012, according to FHWA data.2  Since 2004, 1,926 new bridges have been constructed in the state and 98 bridges have undergone major reconstruction.  The state estimates that it would cost approximately $3.3 billion to fix a total of 7,328 bridges in the state.3 Bridge Inventory: All Bridges Structurally deficient Bridges Type of Bridge Total Number Area (sq. meters) Daily Crossings Total Number Area (sq. meters) Daily Crossings Rural Bridges Interstate 477 653,628 6,922,960 2 494 63,000 Other principal arterial 1,404 1,659,720 8,255,141 26 35,247 147,000 Minor arterial 1,368 888,705 4,476,616 59 33,474 153,330 Major collector 3,902 1,537,783 4,504,341 390 121,915 379,520 Minor collector 837 289,874 713,328 59 14,310 17,719 Local 7,383 1,633,905 1,525,924 1,633 223,604 164,973 Urban Bridges Interstate 298 671,945 8,892,050 1 66,698 29,400 Other freeway 108 192,126 1,418,750 1 1,416 7,500 Principal arterial 381 907,093 5,160,444 12 6,889 111,200 Minor arterial 209 171,087 1,539,447 16 3,636 73,975 Collector 293 117,793 1,010,361 24 3,920 64,162 Local 384 99,720 433,621 51 8,041 25,511 Not classified 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 17,044 8,823,379 44,852,983 2,274 519,646 1,237,290 1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour. 2 ARTBA analysis of FHWA data, includes all bridge construction related spending on projects approved by FHWA between 2003 and 2012. 3 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. However, for some states this amount is very low and likely not an accurate reflection of current costs. State Bridge Profile Mississippi
  • 2.
    © 2014 TheAmerican Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of ARTBA. Proposed bridge work: Type of Work Number Cost (millions) Daily Crossings Area (sq. meters) Bridge replacement 4,823 $2,724.9 6,179,795 1,366,865 Widening & rehabilitation 1,237 $400.8 7,990,325 783,164 Rehabilitation 814 $89.2 694,745 187,850 Deck rehabilitation/replacement 117 $22.7 217,675 34,497 Other work 337 $57.1 467,499 124,838 Top 10 Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State County Year Built Daily Crossings Type of Bridge Location (route/water under the bridge, traffic on the bridge and location) Jackson 1977 49,000 Rural Interstate STREAM, I 10, 1.4 MI E SR 63 Warren 1973 29,400 Urban Interstate MISSISSIPPI RIVER, I 20, MISS/LA STATE LINE Covington 1964 21,000 Rural arterial UNNAMED STREAM, US 49, 0.7 MI N SR 35 Harrison 1938 17,500 Urban other principal arterial FLAT BRANCH, US 49, 3.2 MI N I 10 Pearl River 1948 15,000 Urban other principal arterial HOBOLOCHITTO CREEK, US 11, 0.3 MI S SR 43 NORTH Hinds 1950 14,000 Urban other principal arterial TOWN CREEK, MONUMENT ST, SEC 4 T 5N R 1E Tate 1959 14,000 Rural Interstate SR 306, I 55, I 55 OVER SR 306 Sunflower 1933 11,000 Rural arterial SUNFLOWER RIVER, US 82, 3.9 MI E US 49W Harrison 1938 11,000 Rural arterial LITTLE BILOXI RIVER, US 49, 6.4 MI N I 10 Prentiss 1934 11,000 Urban other principal arterial KINGS CREEK, SR 145, 0.4 MI N SR 4 Sources: All data is from the 2013 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in March 2014. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2013$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.