1. AS Pre-production Tasks Feedback
Student Name: STANGHELLINI Carlo
Blog: http://carlostanghelliniasmedia.blogspot.com/
Task 1 – Pre-production: Research & Planning Evidence on
blog
1. Similar Products – film beginning analysis
There is a lot of describing what we see but there is some
analysis and some attempt to link affect on audience.
Terminology used correctly, though more could have been
written on mise-en-scene. Analysis of Citizen Kane is the
strongest – clear and precise with good use of connotations.
Back to the Future is also good in parts.
Yes
2. Genre Analysis
Brief but goo detail on genre with key themes, codes and
conventions identified. Good use of images.
Yes
3. Target Audience
Research has been done on typical TA with some use of
statistical data used as evidence. Nice use of avatar to
represent TA.
Yes
4. Script
Completed and formatted correctly. Good effective genre
piece.
Yes
6. Storyboard
Good and clear storyboard that shows some variety of shots
and movement. Easy to follow. Tech detail included.
Yes
7. Shotlist
Very detailed - includes shot type, location, sound, equipment
and description.
Yes
8. Layouts – floor plan
Clear plan for different settings. Detail on actor and camera
movement.
Yes
2. 9. Locations
Nice detail on choice of location and how it will be used in
production. Images included. You have managed to get some
very striking rooms to film.
Yes
10.Costumes
Images and detail on how costume reflects character and hint
at narrative.
Yes
11.Props
Good detail on props and how they will be used in key
scenes. Images included.
Yes
12.Actors
Very good detail on choice of actor, images included.
Yes
13.Equipment
Images and reasons for choice of equipment.
Yes
14.Production schedule
Lots of good detail on shooting and editing to assist with
production though could have had pre-production information.
Yes
Teachers comments
Carlo has fully completed his pre production for his course working at a
proficient level. More detail needed on audience and genre. Work well
presented.
All posts have been added to a good level with key features identified.
Mark out of 20: 13
Teacher name: M Drummond Date: January 2016
Student action plan for improvement
Final mark out of 20: 15 Date: March 2016
