The document discusses assets created for a group project. It summarizes drawings by Pawel showing people from different perspectives, and suggests showing the shoe shiner's face for focus. It notes Pawel was asked to draw the same characters in the future. It also discusses a logo created by Cameron that was recolored by the author to match the group's color scheme. Finally, it critiques a casebook by Nikki that contained spelling and factual errors.

1. Assets the group made

2. The drawings
Pawel drew these.
I think that the drawings are quite good, they show
the types of people that we are aiming the video
towards. However I think that the drawing of the guy
shining someone's shoes, could have been closer up
to the guy shining the shoes because he’s meant to be
the focus of the picture and its difficult to tell who is
meant to be the focal point. Also I think it could have
shown his face as it would have made it seem more
personal.
Pawel was meant to draw a second set of the same
characters but in the future where they can be
whoever they want to be. This would have worked
better for the video as it would show a significate
change.

3. The logo
Cameron made the logo.
At first we decided that we did not need a logo, as it was not really
needed as part of the project. However Cameron decided to make it.
He first drew it out on paper to mock it up. Then he made the final
version on photoshop, however the colours that he chose was not
very nice and did not match the color scheme that we had chosen.
So I decided to re-colourize it so that it would match our color
scheme. I wanted to keep the colors similar to the ones that he
originally chose, but make them pastel. I then added a gradient in the
background to add some more detail to the logo. I also added some
highlights at the tops of the buildings and shadows to the bottom, so
that it would match the gradient of the background.

4. Casebook
Nikki wrote the casebook.
There are lots of grammatical and spelling mistakes. For
instance she spelt ‘Footage’ like ‘Photoaged’.
She also added lots of things that were incorrect, such as she
said that Sophie Knight was given the task of drawing the city
scape from the beginning, however it was Pawels task first.
She did not write anything about the posters however.