1) The document summarizes key behaviors and strategies from the first season of the TV show Survivor, including both productive and unproductive team dynamics and ways individuals made themselves relevant. 2) Richard Hatch was able to succeed in Season 1 by being strong in challenges early on and forming alliances to manipulate others later in the game. 3) While the team aims to exhibit positive behaviors like teamwork, destructive behaviors seen on Survivor like bluntness, not listening, and undermining others could undermine people's ability to succeed.

1. Justin Cowan, Nick Yeager, SimonaIsklander, and Nick Hoban

2. Survivor Season 1 Cast

3. Ways not to Communicate Beg. Season Mid/End Season People were being demanding/upset with each other Especially starting off on island together Some members not working hard like others Older members especially Tribes were eliminated People started working alone more Alliances were more important to last in the game Some members were too blunt towards others Caused them to be eliminated earlier than more quiet members

5. Productive Communication Beg. Season Mid/End Season First reaching island worked together well Had to build living space, find food/water Team Challenges showed teamwork Members had to work together or would lose Losing team votes off member Friendships and alliances from previous tribes overpower single players Teamwork pays off with more power Final episode is vote for who they want to win Positive communication in past pays off in end

6. Building Teamwork Beg. Season Mid/End Season Teamwork was very productive Teams had to build camp from scraps Teamwork started all of the alliances and friendships that lasted during game Teamwork started to disappear Game was based more on individual efforts Only lasting teamwork was alliances that were made earlier in the game

7. Who made themselves relevant and therefore succeed? Season 1, it was Richard Hatch

8. How they made themselves relevant Early in the game: The Strongest Who can win challenges for their tribe The Providers Who can fish, hunt, or gather Later in the game: The Manipulators Who make alliances, backstab, and deceive

9. Are any behaviors from Survivor represent on your team? The team building is more of the positive aspects of the show but there aren’t really any of the negative aspects.

10. Destructive behaviors that undermined someone’s ability to become relevant: Blatant or Subtle Jokes: both blatant and subtle. Uses humor to distract what the person is saying. Not hearing/overruling/not listening to people: Subtle if pretending not to hear the person. Blatant if you tell the person to shut up. “Not the one bitchin”: Blatant. Directly tells the group that the person is being detrimental to the group.

12. Behaviors determining Relevance: Blatant or Subtle cont. People overworking: Subtle. This puts others off that they think they are better than the rest of the group Making the negatives of people pointed out for the reason they need to go home: Blatant, directly insinuating they won’t be relevant. Alliances: Subtle, people group up to not allow others to succeed. Voting person off: Blatant, it is part of the game, but shows the person is not a true survivor

14. Misleading people Utilitarianism: Misleading people is normal if the greater good is achieved. The ends justify the means. Kant: Ethical stance that the way a person gets to the end decision is important and universal truths. If everyone misleads each other it causes deceit, chaos, and distrust. If everyone tells the truth and works together toward common goal it creates bond and an utopian society.

16. Is it more important to tell the truth bluntly or be sensitive and still truthful? It is always better to be sensitive and still truthful rather than being blunt. Being blunt can make people become defensive and can break the relationships in a team. Politeness, even if criticizing, provides higher chances to get a good outcome/ solution to a problem.

17. Have you witnessed any of these behaviors in life? One person of a team did someone else's part of the project to be “nice” without being asked to. The other person had nothing left to do for the project and received a C based on team rating. In one of my classes during a team project, one team member out of 4 showed up with his own project because he did not blended into the group.

18. Is it always best to tell the truth and nothing but the truth even if it hurts someone? It depends on the situation and the truth. If someone will be hurt a lie is better. If the truth is constructive criticism, than truth is better. In our case study, as long as the truth does not hurt you and hurts someone else is perfectly fine as long as you do not get caught, if you do you will be voted off. Ethics versus money, or truth versus being voted off.

19. What did you learn from this project? The best one does not always win. Don’t trust anyone. Watch your back. Sweet talk bring more advantages. You have to decide if money or ethics are more important to you.