By
Dr. H.S. ABZAL BASHA, M.B.A., Ph.D., L.L.B.
Assistant Professor,
Department of Management Studies,
G. Pullaiah College of Engineering & Technology,
Kurnool.
EMPOWERMENT PROCESSES
UNIT-2
“Empowerment is not a verb.
It is more a state of mind & way of working”
- Ken Gilliver
Topics
 Delegation and Decentralisation vs. Empowerment.
 Empowerment Processes.
 Job Enrichment,
 Leadership Styles; Likert’s Management Systems including
Tannenbaum and Schmidt leadership continuum.
 Objectives Setting and MBO.
 Team Building; Task Forces, Committees Effectiveness; and Self
Managing Groups.
 TQM and Employee Involvement,
 Quality Circles,
 Involvement of Managerial Personnel.
Delegation and Decentralisation
In delegation, a superior delegates or
transfers some rights and duties to a
subordinate but his responsibility in
respect of that work does not end.
In other words Delegation is the
assignment of authority to another
person to carry out specific activities. It is
the process of distributing and entrusting
work to another person.
On the other hand, decentralisation
relieves him from responsibility and the
subordinate becomes liable for that
work.
Major differences b/w delegation and decentralization
Major differences
1.Responsibility: In delegation, a superior delegates or transfers
some rights and duties to a subordinate but his responsibility in
respect of that work does not end.
2. Process: Delegation is process while decentralisation is the end
result of a deliberate policy of making delegation of authority to the
lowest levels in managerial hierarchy.
3. Need. Delegation is almost essential for the management to get
things done in the organisation i.e., delegating requisite authority
for performance of work assigned. Decentralisation may or may not
be practiced as a systematic policy in the organisation.
4. Control: In delegation the final control over the activities of
organisation lies with the top executive while in decentralisation
the power of control is exercised by the unit head to which the
authority has been delegated.
Major differences
5. Authority: Delegation represents selecting dispersal of authority
whereas decentralisation signifies the creation of autonomous and
self-sufficient units or divisions.
6. Scope: Delegation hardly poses any problem of co- ordination to
the delegator of authority. While decentralisation poses a great
problem in this regard since extreme freedom of action is given to
the people by creating self-sufficient or autonomous units.
7. Good Results: Decentralisation is effective only in big
organisations whereas delegation is required and gives good results
in all types of organisations irrespective of their size.
8. Nature: Delegation is the result of human limitation to the span
of management. Decentralisation is the other hand, is the result of
the big size and multi-farious functions of the enterprise.
Delegation
Decentralisation
The Empowerment Processes
J.W. Weiss states that empowerment is
the process of sharing power with
others through decentralizing structures,
roles, and responsibilities and through
delegating work that has inherent
authority.
Prager pointed-out “the process of
empowerment that centre on involving
people and enabling them to take
ownership of their work process and
outcomes”.
Empowered individuals “have a sense of
trust, energy, commitment,
responsibility and pride in their work
and its product or service”.
Empowerment: From Domination to Delegation
Job Enrichment
Frederick Herzberg, an American
psychologist, originally developed
the concept of 'job enrichment' in
1968. The concept stemmed from
Herzberg's motivator-hygiene
theory.
Job enrichment is a process that is
characterized by adding dimensions
to existing jobs to make them more
motivating.
Examples of job enrichment include
adding extra tasks increasing skill
variety, adding meaning to jobs,
creating autonomy, and giving
feedback.
Leader and Leadership
Leadership is the art of motivating a
group of people to act toward
achieving a common goal. In a
business setting, this can mean
directing workers and colleagues
with a strategy to meet the
company's needs.
Leader is a person who leads or
commands a group, organization, or
country.
Leadership is ability to influence
people to achieve the given goals in
an organization.
The leader is characterized by his
vision, ability to inspire followers,
communication skills, and personality
characteristics such as charisma,
appearance maneuvering skills, high
energy levels, adaptability,
aggressiveness, enthusiasm, self-
confidence, initiative and a strong
capacity to convert the unfavourable
situation to a favourable one for the
benefit of the organization.
System 1 : Exploitative
Democratic- The leaders are
highlyautocratic and they take
decisions unilaterally. They
have no confidence on their
subordinates and have no
confidence on there
subordinates
System 2: Benevolent
Autocratic- The leaders are
autocratic but not highly
autocratic. They sometimes
consult theresubordinates and
have some confidence in them
but keep strict control over
them.
Likert’s 4 System Of Management
System 3: Consultative
• The leaders consult their
subordinates beforetaking
final decisions and also
believe in delegating some
authority to them.
System 4: Democratic
• The leadersdiscuss the issues
with their subordinates and
decisions are taken by
consensus.
Leadership as Continuum
 They are in fact a variety of styles of leadership behavior
between two extremes of autocratic and free rein.
Autocratic
Free- rein
Useof authority by the
manager
Areaof freedom by the
subordinates
Boss-centered Employee-centered
Managerial Grid
1.9 9.9
5.5
1.1 9.1
This style develoved by Blake & Mouton is based on two dimensional view
of leadership style. They proposed “concern for people” and “concern for
production” as the two dimensions
They given a model in the form of grid which has been formulated on two
9 point scales as depicted in the following diagram and have identified
five leadership styles.
Concern for production
Concern for people
1,9- Low concern for production and high
concern for people
9,9- High concern for both peopleand production
5,5- Moderateconcern for both peopleand production
9,1- High concern forproduction and lowconcern for
people
1,1- Low concern for both production and people
In this approach there are four basic styles resulting into 8 styles
these eight styles result from 8 possible combination of task
orientation , relationship orientation and effectiveness as shown
in figure below
Basic style Less effective style More effective style
Integrated Compromiser Executive
Dedicated Autocrat Benevolent Autocrat
Related Missionary Developer
Separated Deserter Bureaucrat
Management By Objectives
Management by objectives (MBO), also known as management
by planning (MBP), was first popularized by Peter Drucker in his
1954 book The Practice of Management.
Management by objectives is the process of defining specific
objectives within an organization that management can convey to
organisation members, then deciding how to achieve each
objective in sequence.
This process allows managers to take work that needs to be done
one step at a time to allow for a calm, yet productive work
environment. This process also helps organization members to
see their accomplishments as they achieve each objective, which
reinforces a positive work environment and a sense of
achievement.
Concept and framework
MBO at its core is the process of
employers/supervisors attempting
to manage their subordinates by
introducing a set of specific goals
that both the employee and the
company strive to achieve in the
near future, and working to meet
those goals accordingly.
Five steps:
1. Review organizational goal
2. Set worker objective
3. Monitor progress
4. Evaluation
5. Give reward
Team Building
Empowerment Process

Empowerment Process

  • 1.
    By Dr. H.S. ABZALBASHA, M.B.A., Ph.D., L.L.B. Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, G. Pullaiah College of Engineering & Technology, Kurnool. EMPOWERMENT PROCESSES UNIT-2
  • 2.
    “Empowerment is nota verb. It is more a state of mind & way of working” - Ken Gilliver
  • 3.
    Topics  Delegation andDecentralisation vs. Empowerment.  Empowerment Processes.  Job Enrichment,  Leadership Styles; Likert’s Management Systems including Tannenbaum and Schmidt leadership continuum.  Objectives Setting and MBO.  Team Building; Task Forces, Committees Effectiveness; and Self Managing Groups.  TQM and Employee Involvement,  Quality Circles,  Involvement of Managerial Personnel.
  • 4.
    Delegation and Decentralisation Indelegation, a superior delegates or transfers some rights and duties to a subordinate but his responsibility in respect of that work does not end. In other words Delegation is the assignment of authority to another person to carry out specific activities. It is the process of distributing and entrusting work to another person. On the other hand, decentralisation relieves him from responsibility and the subordinate becomes liable for that work.
  • 6.
    Major differences b/wdelegation and decentralization
  • 7.
    Major differences 1.Responsibility: Indelegation, a superior delegates or transfers some rights and duties to a subordinate but his responsibility in respect of that work does not end. 2. Process: Delegation is process while decentralisation is the end result of a deliberate policy of making delegation of authority to the lowest levels in managerial hierarchy. 3. Need. Delegation is almost essential for the management to get things done in the organisation i.e., delegating requisite authority for performance of work assigned. Decentralisation may or may not be practiced as a systematic policy in the organisation. 4. Control: In delegation the final control over the activities of organisation lies with the top executive while in decentralisation the power of control is exercised by the unit head to which the authority has been delegated.
  • 8.
    Major differences 5. Authority:Delegation represents selecting dispersal of authority whereas decentralisation signifies the creation of autonomous and self-sufficient units or divisions. 6. Scope: Delegation hardly poses any problem of co- ordination to the delegator of authority. While decentralisation poses a great problem in this regard since extreme freedom of action is given to the people by creating self-sufficient or autonomous units. 7. Good Results: Decentralisation is effective only in big organisations whereas delegation is required and gives good results in all types of organisations irrespective of their size. 8. Nature: Delegation is the result of human limitation to the span of management. Decentralisation is the other hand, is the result of the big size and multi-farious functions of the enterprise.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 12.
    The Empowerment Processes J.W.Weiss states that empowerment is the process of sharing power with others through decentralizing structures, roles, and responsibilities and through delegating work that has inherent authority. Prager pointed-out “the process of empowerment that centre on involving people and enabling them to take ownership of their work process and outcomes”. Empowered individuals “have a sense of trust, energy, commitment, responsibility and pride in their work and its product or service”.
  • 13.
  • 15.
    Job Enrichment Frederick Herzberg,an American psychologist, originally developed the concept of 'job enrichment' in 1968. The concept stemmed from Herzberg's motivator-hygiene theory. Job enrichment is a process that is characterized by adding dimensions to existing jobs to make them more motivating. Examples of job enrichment include adding extra tasks increasing skill variety, adding meaning to jobs, creating autonomy, and giving feedback.
  • 17.
    Leader and Leadership Leadershipis the art of motivating a group of people to act toward achieving a common goal. In a business setting, this can mean directing workers and colleagues with a strategy to meet the company's needs. Leader is a person who leads or commands a group, organization, or country. Leadership is ability to influence people to achieve the given goals in an organization. The leader is characterized by his vision, ability to inspire followers, communication skills, and personality characteristics such as charisma, appearance maneuvering skills, high energy levels, adaptability, aggressiveness, enthusiasm, self- confidence, initiative and a strong capacity to convert the unfavourable situation to a favourable one for the benefit of the organization.
  • 18.
    System 1 :Exploitative Democratic- The leaders are highlyautocratic and they take decisions unilaterally. They have no confidence on their subordinates and have no confidence on there subordinates System 2: Benevolent Autocratic- The leaders are autocratic but not highly autocratic. They sometimes consult theresubordinates and have some confidence in them but keep strict control over them. Likert’s 4 System Of Management
  • 19.
    System 3: Consultative •The leaders consult their subordinates beforetaking final decisions and also believe in delegating some authority to them. System 4: Democratic • The leadersdiscuss the issues with their subordinates and decisions are taken by consensus.
  • 20.
    Leadership as Continuum They are in fact a variety of styles of leadership behavior between two extremes of autocratic and free rein. Autocratic Free- rein Useof authority by the manager Areaof freedom by the subordinates Boss-centered Employee-centered
  • 21.
    Managerial Grid 1.9 9.9 5.5 1.19.1 This style develoved by Blake & Mouton is based on two dimensional view of leadership style. They proposed “concern for people” and “concern for production” as the two dimensions They given a model in the form of grid which has been formulated on two 9 point scales as depicted in the following diagram and have identified five leadership styles. Concern for production Concern for people
  • 22.
    1,9- Low concernfor production and high concern for people 9,9- High concern for both peopleand production 5,5- Moderateconcern for both peopleand production 9,1- High concern forproduction and lowconcern for people 1,1- Low concern for both production and people
  • 23.
    In this approachthere are four basic styles resulting into 8 styles these eight styles result from 8 possible combination of task orientation , relationship orientation and effectiveness as shown in figure below Basic style Less effective style More effective style Integrated Compromiser Executive Dedicated Autocrat Benevolent Autocrat Related Missionary Developer Separated Deserter Bureaucrat
  • 24.
    Management By Objectives Managementby objectives (MBO), also known as management by planning (MBP), was first popularized by Peter Drucker in his 1954 book The Practice of Management. Management by objectives is the process of defining specific objectives within an organization that management can convey to organisation members, then deciding how to achieve each objective in sequence. This process allows managers to take work that needs to be done one step at a time to allow for a calm, yet productive work environment. This process also helps organization members to see their accomplishments as they achieve each objective, which reinforces a positive work environment and a sense of achievement.
  • 25.
    Concept and framework MBOat its core is the process of employers/supervisors attempting to manage their subordinates by introducing a set of specific goals that both the employee and the company strive to achieve in the near future, and working to meet those goals accordingly. Five steps: 1. Review organizational goal 2. Set worker objective 3. Monitor progress 4. Evaluation 5. Give reward
  • 27.