A 27-year old female presented with persistent central intrascapular pain after a high-speed skiing injury in Japan. Imaging revealed fractures at C7, T1 spinous processes, and T7 vertebral body. She was initially managed conservatively with a cervical collar and neuro checks. However, evidence shows cervical collars may do more harm than good and their use is based more on tradition than clinical evidence. Proper history and exam, along with imaging as indicated, are more important for assessing spinal injury and instability than routine hard collar use.
Damage control is a Navy term defined as “the capacity of a ship to absorb damage and maintain mission integrity". Damage Control Orthopaedics (DCO) is a relatively recent concept in orthopaedic practice it means early rapid containment & stabilization of orthopedic injuries without worsening the patient general condition. It is indicated in critically ill polytrauma patient, unfavorable surgical environment, battlefield limb injuries & mass casualties.
describing the decision making process in deciding which implant to use for trochanteric fractures and its complications - done for Basic AO course in Bengbu, China
Damage control is a Navy term defined as “the capacity of a ship to absorb damage and maintain mission integrity". Damage Control Orthopaedics (DCO) is a relatively recent concept in orthopaedic practice it means early rapid containment & stabilization of orthopedic injuries without worsening the patient general condition. It is indicated in critically ill polytrauma patient, unfavorable surgical environment, battlefield limb injuries & mass casualties.
describing the decision making process in deciding which implant to use for trochanteric fractures and its complications - done for Basic AO course in Bengbu, China
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...kevinkariuki227
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
The prostate is an exocrine gland of the male mammalian reproductive system
It is a walnut-sized gland that forms part of the male reproductive system and is located in front of the rectum and just below the urinary bladder
Function is to store and secrete a clear, slightly alkaline fluid that constitutes 10-30% of the volume of the seminal fluid that along with the spermatozoa, constitutes semen
A healthy human prostate measures (4cm-vertical, by 3cm-horizontal, 2cm ant-post ).
It surrounds the urethra just below the urinary bladder. It has anterior, median, posterior and two lateral lobes
It’s work is regulated by androgens which are responsible for male sex characteristics
Generalised disease of the prostate due to hormonal derangement which leads to non malignant enlargement of the gland (increase in the number of epithelial cells and stromal tissue)to cause compression of the urethra leading to symptoms (LUTS
Recomendações da OMS sobre cuidados maternos e neonatais para uma experiência pós-natal positiva.
Em consonância com os ODS – Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável e a Estratégia Global para a Saúde das Mulheres, Crianças e Adolescentes, e aplicando uma abordagem baseada nos direitos humanos, os esforços de cuidados pós-natais devem expandir-se para além da cobertura e da simples sobrevivência, de modo a incluir cuidados de qualidade.
Estas diretrizes visam melhorar a qualidade dos cuidados pós-natais essenciais e de rotina prestados às mulheres e aos recém-nascidos, com o objetivo final de melhorar a saúde e o bem-estar materno e neonatal.
Uma “experiência pós-natal positiva” é um resultado importante para todas as mulheres que dão à luz e para os seus recém-nascidos, estabelecendo as bases para a melhoria da saúde e do bem-estar a curto e longo prazo. Uma experiência pós-natal positiva é definida como aquela em que as mulheres, pessoas que gestam, os recém-nascidos, os casais, os pais, os cuidadores e as famílias recebem informação consistente, garantia e apoio de profissionais de saúde motivados; e onde um sistema de saúde flexível e com recursos reconheça as necessidades das mulheres e dos bebês e respeite o seu contexto cultural.
Estas diretrizes consolidadas apresentam algumas recomendações novas e já bem fundamentadas sobre cuidados pós-natais de rotina para mulheres e neonatos que recebem cuidados no pós-parto em unidades de saúde ou na comunidade, independentemente dos recursos disponíveis.
É fornecido um conjunto abrangente de recomendações para cuidados durante o período puerperal, com ênfase nos cuidados essenciais que todas as mulheres e recém-nascidos devem receber, e com a devida atenção à qualidade dos cuidados; isto é, a entrega e a experiência do cuidado recebido. Estas diretrizes atualizam e ampliam as recomendações da OMS de 2014 sobre cuidados pós-natais da mãe e do recém-nascido e complementam as atuais diretrizes da OMS sobre a gestão de complicações pós-natais.
O estabelecimento da amamentação e o manejo das principais intercorrências é contemplada.
Recomendamos muito.
Vamos discutir essas recomendações no nosso curso de pós-graduação em Aleitamento no Instituto Ciclos.
Esta publicação só está disponível em inglês até o momento.
Prof. Marcus Renato de Carvalho
www.agostodourado.com
HOT NEW PRODUCT! BIG SALES FAST SHIPPING NOW FROM CHINA!! EU KU DB BK substit...GL Anaacs
Contact us if you are interested:
Email / Skype : kefaya1771@gmail.com
Threema: PXHY5PDH
New BATCH Ku !!! MUCH IN DEMAND FAST SALE EVERY BATCH HAPPY GOOD EFFECT BIG BATCH !
Contact me on Threema or skype to start big business!!
Hot-sale products:
NEW HOT EUTYLONE WHITE CRYSTAL!!
5cl-adba precursor (semi finished )
5cl-adba raw materials
ADBB precursor (semi finished )
ADBB raw materials
APVP powder
5fadb/4f-adb
Jwh018 / Jwh210
Eutylone crystal
Protonitazene (hydrochloride) CAS: 119276-01-6
Flubrotizolam CAS: 57801-95-3
Metonitazene CAS: 14680-51-4
Payment terms: Western Union,MoneyGram,Bitcoin or USDT.
Deliver Time: Usually 7-15days
Shipping method: FedEx, TNT, DHL,UPS etc.Our deliveries are 100% safe, fast, reliable and discreet.
Samples will be sent for your evaluation!If you are interested in, please contact me, let's talk details.
We specializes in exporting high quality Research chemical, medical intermediate, Pharmaceutical chemicals and so on. Products are exported to USA, Canada, France, Korea, Japan,Russia, Southeast Asia and other countries.
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/lK81BzxMqdo
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/Ve4P0COk9OI
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
Pulmonary Thromboembolism - etilogy, types, medical- Surgical and nursing man...VarunMahajani
Disruption of blood supply to lung alveoli due to blockage of one or more pulmonary blood vessels is called as Pulmonary thromboembolism. In this presentation we will discuss its causes, types and its management in depth.
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...i3 Health
i3 Health is pleased to make the speaker slides from this activity available for use as a non-accredited self-study or teaching resource.
This slide deck presented by Dr. Kami Maddocks, Professor-Clinical in the Division of Hematology and
Associate Division Director for Ambulatory Operations
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, will provide insight into new directions in targeted therapeutic approaches for older adults with mantle cell lymphoma.
STATEMENT OF NEED
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for 5% to 7% of all lymphomas. Its prognosis ranges from indolent disease that does not require treatment for years to very aggressive disease, which is associated with poor survival (Silkenstedt et al, 2021). Typically, MCL is diagnosed at advanced stage and in older patients who cannot tolerate intensive therapy (NCCN, 2022). Although recent advances have slightly increased remission rates, recurrence and relapse remain very common, leading to a median overall survival between 3 and 6 years (LLS, 2021). Though there are several effective options, progress is still needed towards establishing an accepted frontline approach for MCL (Castellino et al, 2022). Treatment selection and management of MCL are complicated by the heterogeneity of prognosis, advanced age and comorbidities of patients, and lack of an established standard approach for treatment, making it vital that clinicians be familiar with the latest research and advances in this area. In this activity chaired by Michael Wang, MD, Professor in the Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma at MD Anderson Cancer Center, expert faculty will discuss prognostic factors informing treatment, the promising results of recent trials in new therapeutic approaches, and the implications of treatment resistance in therapeutic selection for MCL.
Target Audience
Hematology/oncology fellows, attending faculty, and other health care professionals involved in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Learning Objectives
1.) Identify clinical and biological prognostic factors that can guide treatment decision making for older adults with MCL
2.) Evaluate emerging data on targeted therapeutic approaches for treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory MCL and their applicability to older adults
3.) Assess mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies for MCL and their implications for treatment selection
Title: Sense of Smell
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the primary categories of smells and the concept of odor blindness.
Explain the structure and location of the olfactory membrane and mucosa, including the types and roles of cells involved in olfaction.
Describe the pathway and mechanisms of olfactory signal transmission from the olfactory receptors to the brain.
Illustrate the biochemical cascade triggered by odorant binding to olfactory receptors, including the role of G-proteins and second messengers in generating an action potential.
Identify different types of olfactory disorders such as anosmia, hyposmia, hyperosmia, and dysosmia, including their potential causes.
Key Topics:
Olfactory Genes:
3% of the human genome accounts for olfactory genes.
400 genes for odorant receptors.
Olfactory Membrane:
Located in the superior part of the nasal cavity.
Medially: Folds downward along the superior septum.
Laterally: Folds over the superior turbinate and upper surface of the middle turbinate.
Total surface area: 5-10 square centimeters.
Olfactory Mucosa:
Olfactory Cells: Bipolar nerve cells derived from the CNS (100 million), with 4-25 olfactory cilia per cell.
Sustentacular Cells: Produce mucus and maintain ionic and molecular environment.
Basal Cells: Replace worn-out olfactory cells with an average lifespan of 1-2 months.
Bowman’s Gland: Secretes mucus.
Stimulation of Olfactory Cells:
Odorant dissolves in mucus and attaches to receptors on olfactory cilia.
Involves a cascade effect through G-proteins and second messengers, leading to depolarization and action potential generation in the olfactory nerve.
Quality of a Good Odorant:
Small (3-20 Carbon atoms), volatile, water-soluble, and lipid-soluble.
Facilitated by odorant-binding proteins in mucus.
Membrane Potential and Action Potential:
Resting membrane potential: -55mV.
Action potential frequency in the olfactory nerve increases with odorant strength.
Adaptation Towards the Sense of Smell:
Rapid adaptation within the first second, with further slow adaptation.
Psychological adaptation greater than receptor adaptation, involving feedback inhibition from the central nervous system.
Primary Sensations of Smell:
Camphoraceous, Musky, Floral, Pepperminty, Ethereal, Pungent, Putrid.
Odor Detection Threshold:
Examples: Hydrogen sulfide (0.0005 ppm), Methyl-mercaptan (0.002 ppm).
Some toxic substances are odorless at lethal concentrations.
Characteristics of Smell:
Odor blindness for single substances due to lack of appropriate receptor protein.
Behavioral and emotional influences of smell.
Transmission of Olfactory Signals:
From olfactory cells to glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, involving lateral inhibition.
Primitive, less old, and new olfactory systems with different path
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journeygreendigital
Tom Selleck, an enduring figure in Hollywood. has captivated audiences for decades with his rugged charm, iconic moustache. and memorable roles in television and film. From his breakout role as Thomas Magnum in Magnum P.I. to his current portrayal of Frank Reagan in Blue Bloods. Selleck's career has spanned over 50 years. But beyond his professional achievements. fans have often been curious about Tom Selleck Health. especially as he has aged in the public eye.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Many have been interested in Tom Selleck health. not only because of his enduring presence on screen but also because of the challenges. and lifestyle choices he has faced and made over the years. This article delves into the various aspects of Tom Selleck health. exploring his fitness regimen, diet, mental health. and the challenges he has encountered as he ages. We'll look at how he maintains his well-being. the health issues he has faced, and his approach to ageing .
Early Life and Career
Childhood and Athletic Beginnings
Tom Selleck was born on January 29, 1945, in Detroit, Michigan, and grew up in Sherman Oaks, California. From an early age, he was involved in sports, particularly basketball. which played a significant role in his physical development. His athletic pursuits continued into college. where he attended the University of Southern California (USC) on a basketball scholarship. This early involvement in sports laid a strong foundation for his physical health and disciplined lifestyle.
Transition to Acting
Selleck's transition from an athlete to an actor came with its physical demands. His first significant role in "Magnum P.I." required him to perform various stunts and maintain a fit appearance. This role, which he played from 1980 to 1988. necessitated a rigorous fitness routine to meet the show's demands. setting the stage for his long-term commitment to health and wellness.
Fitness Regimen
Workout Routine
Tom Selleck health and fitness regimen has evolved. adapting to his changing roles and age. During his "Magnum, P.I." days. Selleck's workouts were intense and focused on building and maintaining muscle mass. His routine included weightlifting, cardiovascular exercises. and specific training for the stunts he performed on the show.
Selleck adjusted his fitness routine as he aged to suit his body's needs. Today, his workouts focus on maintaining flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular health. He incorporates low-impact exercises such as swimming, walking, and light weightlifting. This balanced approach helps him stay fit without putting undue strain on his joints and muscles.
Importance of Flexibility and Mobility
In recent years, Selleck has emphasized the importance of flexibility and mobility in his fitness regimen. Understanding the natural decline in muscle mass and joint flexibility with age. he includes stretching and yoga in his routine. These practices help prevent injuries, improve posture, and maintain mobilit
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,sisternakatoto
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,ABORTION WOMEN’S CLINIC +27730423979 IN women clinic we believe that every woman should be able to make choices in her pregnancy. Our job is to provide compassionate care, safety,affordable and confidential services. That’s why we have won the trust from all generations of women all over the world. we use non surgical method(Abortion pills) to terminate…Dr.LISA +27730423979women Clinic is committed to providing the highest quality of obstetrical and gynecological care to women of all ages. Our dedicated staff aim to treat each patient and her health concerns with compassion and respect.Our dedicated group ABORTION WOMEN’S CLINIC +27730423979 IN women clinic we believe that every woman should be able to make choices in her pregnancy. Our job is to provide compassionate care, safety,affordable and confidential services. That’s why we have won the trust from all generations of women all over the world. we use non surgical method(Abortion pills) to terminate…Dr.LISA +27730423979women Clinic is committed to providing the highest quality of obstetrical and gynecological care to women of all ages. Our dedicated staff aim to treat each patient and her health concerns with compassion and respect.Our dedicated group of receptionists, nurses, and physicians have worked together as a teamof receptionists, nurses, and physicians have worked together as a team wwww.lisywomensclinic.co.za/
Spinal Trauma: The Legend of the C-Spine Collar - A Case Report
1. Spinal Trauma:
The Legend of the C-Spine Collar
Trauma Grand Rounds 14/04/15
Dr Emma McVeigh
Emergency Medicine Registrar
2. Case Report
27 year old female presents 18/7 post high
speed ski injury in Japan
c/o persistent central intrascapular pain
worse on lifting
Denies any focal or peripheral neurology
Systemically well
3. Mechanism/ Hx of Injury
Injury at approximately 60kph
Hyperflexion injury with axial loading
c/o “excruciating 10/10 pain” at time of injury over cervical and thoracic
spine
No paraesthesiae/ No weakness
Patient mobilised 10min post-injury and continued to ski down slope
C/o severe intermittent pain localised Cervico-Thoracic junction over
next 1/52
Some relief from simple analgesia
Continued to ski again 2/7 post injury
Went surfing twice
Returned to work for 2/52 in a physical occupation
4. HxPc
Urged to present to ED on the advice of friends due
to persistent pain
Maximal pain over T1 post lifting/mobilising lasting
for several hours
Intermittent Naproxen 1000mg SR provided relief
No paraesthesia
No weakness
No incontinence
5. O/E:
Vitals: Stable
GCS: 15
Mobilising
No focal neurology
No peripheral neurology
Tender to palpation over cervico-thoracic
junction to mid-thoracic spine
All other examination grossly normal
6.
7.
8. Epidemiology
US 10,000 Spinal fractures/ year
Peak incidence 15-35yo, 61%Male
Associated w/ RTAs and Sports injuries
USA nationwide study 8634 spinal fractures 2000-2008
Alpine tertiary centre 728 fractures 2000-2006
– Subluxation/dislocation 73 patients
Skiers = C-spine Vs Snowboarders= Lumbar
– Cervical 19.6%
– Thoracic10.9%
– Lumbar 6%
13. Stable Vs Unstable
Most important concept is that of “stability”White et Al.
Definition of Instability:
“The loss of ability of the cervical spine under
physiological loads to maintain relationships between
the vertebrae in such a way, that spinal cord or nerve
roots are not damaged or irritated and deformity or
pain does not occur”Leemans and Calder 2012
16. An Approach to the Spinal Patient
1) Full spinal immobilization care until cleared
2) Detailed Hx and Exam
Mechanism of injury
Speed
Other injuries
1) CT C-Spine (High Resolution)
2) Formal Radiologist/Orthopaedic/Neurosurgical opinion
3) Any doubt
High risk injury / Neuro deficit MRI
CT Abnormal MRI
Normal Clear C-Spine
21. C-Spine X-rays
A standard series of X-rays of the cervical spine consists of three views:
– AP
– Lateral
– AP odontoid peg
Lateral view must show the top of the T1 vertebral body
Odontoid peg view should show the lateral masses of the atlanto-axial articulation
In children aged <10, use a AP and lateral radiographs,
No peg view
CT imaging to clarify abnormalities or uncertainties
Indications:
– Patients with neck pain or midline tenderness if aged ≥65 years
– Any age if there was a dangerous mechanism of injury
– Definitive diagnosis of cervical spine injury is needed urgently (eg, before surgery)
– Any patients where it is considered unsafe to assess movement.
22. C-spine CT Scanning
CT scan is indicated immediately if:
– GCS <13
– Intubated
– Multi-region trauma
CT is also indicated:
– If plain films are inadequate/suspicious/definitely abnormal
– High clinical suspicion
CT is superior to plain radiography
– Sensitivity: 100%
– Specificity: 99%.
23. C-spine MRI Scanning
Soft tissue structures
Intervertebral disc injury
– Sensitivity: 93%
Posterior longitudinal injury
– Sensitivity: 93%
Interspinous Ligament injury
– Sensitivity: 100%
MRI is indicated for patients with neurological signs, even if plain films
are negative
MRI can distinguish haematoma from oedema
25. Case Report
Diagnosis of:
– C7 Fracture
– T1 Spinous Process Fractures
– T7 Vertebral Body Compression Fracture
26. Initial Management
Full C-spine Precaution
Neurology Examination: Normal
4-hourly Neuro Observation
Further imaging including CT
Cervical/Thoracic Spine and MRI Spine
27.
28.
29.
30. Definitive Management
Transfer to RPH Spinal Unit in full spinal
precautions awaiting Spinal Review
Initial decision for C7/T1 Fusion
Remained in full spinal precaution 4.5/7
S/B Spinal Consultant 5/7 post diagnosis
Decision for conservative mx in Thoracic
Aspen collar
31.
32. Discussion: When can we clear the c-
spine?
Controversial issue
C-spine clearance can be clinical +/- Radiological
Treatments are vastly different
– Stability
Until patients are cleared they must be immobilized
in a hard-collar, in line stabilisation and log rolled
33. Hard collars
Use of hard-collars is standard of care
– Fear of not using the collar in undx SCIs or
worse….being judged by colleagues
35. Why do we use the collar?
American Association of neurological
surgeons
– Guidelines mandate use of hard collar
– 1970s full Neurological Lesions 55%
– In 1980s Partial lesion 61%.......at same time as
hard collars introduced
Correlation vs Causality
36. But it’s a harmless intervention…
Ulcers
Raised ICP – ‘Brain tourniquet’
Actually could make fractures worse
Intoxicated patient
Airway management
Painful
Increased cost and time
– 4hr rule…
37. Is it harmful?
Myths of the cervical collar…
1. Injured patients may have an unstable injury of the
cervical spine
2. Further movement of the c-spine could cause addition
damage to the spinal cord over and above that already
caused by the initial trauma
3. The application of a semi-rigid collar prevents potentially
harmful movements of the c-spine
4. Immobilisation of the c-spine is a relatively harmless
measure and can therefore be applied to a large number
of patients with a relatively low risk of injury “as a
precaution”.
38. Take Home Message…….
Mechanism of injury should arouse suspicion
– i.e. falling while skiing at 60kph Vs tripping over
your shoelaces
Knowledge of anatomy and the concept of
stability
Ax rules are useful but not very specific, a
senior clinician’s gestalt is all important
The hard collar is not the be all and end all
39. THM cont…
Don’t transfer a trauma patient to RPH the
same week as FSH changeover….
Don’t go skiing with two other emergency
registrars…
44. References
[1] Sanders KM1, Seeman E, Ugoni AM, Pasco JA, Martin TJ, Skoric B, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA.
Age- and gender-specific rate of fractures in Australia: a population-based study. Osteoporosis
International. 1999; 10 (3) 240-7
[2] Hubbard M.E., Jewell R.P., Dumont T.M., Rughani A.R. (2011). Spinal injury patterns among skiers and
snowboarders. Neurosurgical FOCUS. Nov 2011; 31: 5
[3] White AA 3rd, Johnson RM, Panjabi MM. Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical
spine. Clin Orthop. 1975;(109):85-96. [Medline].
[4] Leemans and Calder. The Unstable Cervical Spine. In: (eds) Johnston I, Harrop-Griffiths W. and Gemmell
L. AAGBI Topics in Anaesthesia 2012. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackhall 2012 p88-104
[5] Sundstrøm T, et al. Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review.Review
article J Neurotrauma. 2014
[6] Wee B, Reynolds JH, Bleetman A; Imaging after trauma to the neck. BMJ. 2008 Jan 19;336(7636):154-7.
Triage - assessment - investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children and
adults; NICE Clinical Guideline (September 2007)
Can anyone describe this xray?
There are fractures through C7 and T1 spinous processes.
Can anyone describe this xray?
In addition, there is a wedge compression fracture of T7 vertebral body, with 35% anterior vertebral body height loss. See CT cervicothoracic spine for further details.
There is little population-based data concerning fracture rates in Australia.
SCIs are a major cause of morbidity and mortality for skiiers and snowboarders. One nationwide inpatient sample 200-2008 demonstrated 8634 patients presented with spinal injuries. Another large tertiary centre study carried out in July 200-2006 showed 728 SCIs with severe SCI (Fracture – subluxation/dislocation found in 73 patients. From a paper on thoracic and lumbar spine fractures associated with skiing thoracic ocmpression injuries accounted for 94.7%
[1] Sanders KM1, Seeman E, Ugoni AM, Pasco JA, Martin TJ, Skoric B, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA.
Age- and gender-specific rate of fractures in Australia: a population-based study. Osteoporosis International. 1999; 10 (3) 240-7
[2] Hubbard M.E., Jewell R.P., Dumont T.M., Rughani A.R. (2011). Spinal injury patterns among skiers and snowboarders. Neurosurgical FOCUS. Nov 2011; 31: 5
It is important with any patient with this mechanism of action to have a high index of suspicion and understand the architecture / anatomy of the spine. This will allow a better understanding of the classification of fracture and whether the fracture is stable or unstable.
The spinal column has three main sections-the cervical spine, the thoracic spine, and the lumbar spine.
It is worth noting:
normally the cervical spinal nerves are named for the vertebra that they emerge under; T9 spinal nerve emerges in the intervertebral foramen between T9 and T10
the first cervical spinal nerve (C1/sub-occipital nerve) emerges above C1 vertebra (actually between the skull and C1)
therefore C7 spinal nerve emerges above the C7 vertebra and the C8 spinal neve emerges below the C7 vertebra
C1 is the Atlas
C2 is the Axis
Transverse Process
Spinous Process
Body of the vertebrae
The cervical vertebrae allow greater range of motion than all the other vertebrae.
Each vertebra has several important parts: the body, vertebral foramen, spinous process, and transverse process.
The body is the main weight-bearing region of a vertebra, making up the bulk of the bone’s mass.
Extending from the body, the transverse processes are thin columns of bone that point out to the left and right sides of the body.
The spinous process extends from the ends of the transverse processes in the posterior direction.
Between the body, transverse processes and spinous process is the vertebral foramen, a hollow space that contains the spinal cord and meninges.
The spine is commonly split up into three columns
Anterior – ant longitudinal ligament and ant 2/3 of vertebral bodies
Middle – post longitudinal ligament and post 1/3 of vertebral bodies
Posterior – ligamentum flavum and pedicles, lamina, spinous processes
If one column is disrupted, other columns may provide sufficient stability to prevent spinal cord injury. If 2 columns are disrupted, the spine may move as 2 separate units, increasing the likelihood of spinal cord injury.
Understanding of this anatomy is important when assessing the stability of a c-spine fracture
Cervical spinal injuries are classified by their mechanism of action.
It is important to undestand the diffrence between a stable and an unstable cervical spine as the treatment and outcome differs greatly.
[3] White AA 3rd, Johnson RM, Panjabi MM. Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop. 1975;(109):85-96. [Medline].
[4] Leemans and Calder. The Unstable Cervical Spine. In: (eds) Johnston I, Harrop-Griffiths W. and Gemmell L. AAGBI Topics in Anaesthesia 2012. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackhall 2012 p88-104
White and Punjabi Scale for measuring instability of a c spine fracture where &gt;5 indicative of an unstable c spine
White and Panjabi&apos;s work on cervical instability culminated in the creation of a scoring checklist to serve as an algorithm and an objective assessment of instability.
Patients are assessed anatomically, radiographically, neurologically, and physiologically. The patient is graded on each of these criteria, and the grades are added to obtain the final score. A total score of 5 or more is indicative of a patient with an unstable spine.
So if we go through our patient’s case step by step we can assess the stability of her spinal injury….
Ant elements in tact – 0
Posterior elements destryed – 2
Stretch test .
In the stretch test, the patient is placed supine with the head supported on a roller platform to reduce friction. The head is placed in a traction rig with and 10-lb loads of weight are applied. The 10-lb weights are added in the presence of the treating physician. The maximum weight allowed is equivalent to 33% of the patient&apos;s body weight. The physician performs serial neurologic assessments of the patient with each addition of weight. A lateral C-spine radiograph is obtained with each addition of weight. The time interval between weight increments should be at least 5 minutes. The stretch test is considered positive for instability if one of the following situations occurs: (1) the patient sustains a change in neurologic function, (2) on comparison with the pretraction radiograph, there is greater than 1.7 mm of interspace separation of the anterior or posterior elements, or (3) there is greater than 7.5° change in the angle between vertebrae. Theoretically useful but not performed in practice
Radiographic criteria – Flexion/ext xrays not done
- Resting xrays: Sagital displacement – neg. 1 for relative angulation
Disc narrowing – 0
Spinal canal – no narrowing
SC Damage – 0
Nerve route damage – 0
Dangerous loading – 1
Total 4-5 ???Stable Vs unstable
As mentioned before in the classfication
[3] White AA 3rd, Johnson RM, Panjabi MM. Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop. 1975;(109):85-96. [Medline].
The distance (a) is measured from the posterior-inferior corner of the vertebral body above the allegedly unstable disk space, to the posterior-superior corner of the vertebral body below the allegedly unstable disk space. The distance (b) is the anterior-posterior sagittal-plane diameter of the vertebral body above the allegedly unstable disk space. According to White and Panjabi&apos;s outline, evidence of instability exists if the distance (a) is greater than 20% of distance (b). Alternatively, if the linear distance (a) is greater than 3.5 mm, instability is evident. In conclusion: If (a)/(b) x 100 &gt; 20%, or if (a) &gt; 3.5 mm, then instability is evident.
The American Spinal Injury association imparment scale is widely used by neurosurgeons to aid assessment of the patient.
Assess for manifestations of injury at the cervical / thoracic or lumbar region
So how do we assess the c-spine?
We are all familiar with the Canadian Cspine rules and the Nexus C spine rules
CCR was developed to help physicians determine which trauma patients need c-spine imaging
CCR is highly sensitive for CSI with the majority of studies finding it catches 99-100% of these types of injury
Applying the CCR allows HC providers to safely decrease need for imaging among this patient pop by over 40%
Subsepquent studies have found a sens of 90-100% for CSI with 99-100% sens.
Patients that are high risk due to age, dangerous mechanism of injury, or presence of paresthesias must have radiography.
2.Patients with any 1 to 5 low risk characteristics may safely undergo clinical assessment if active range of motion is possible. Low risk criteria include:
a. Ambulatoryb. Without midline tenderness or immediate onset of painc. Able to sit upd. Simple rear-end motor vehicle collisione. Cna cctively turn head 45 degrees in both directions
3. Patients who are able to actively rotate their neck 45 degrees to the left and right regardless of pain do not require imaging.
Exclusion criteria
Non trauma patients
GCS &lt;15
Unstable vitals
Age &lt;16
Acute paralysis
Known vertebral diseasee
Previous c spine surg
[3] Sundstrøm T, et al. Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review.
Review article J Neurotrauma. 2014.
A study included a prospective observational sample of 34,069 patients aged 1-101 presenting to 21 us trauma centres. 1.7% had clinically significcant CSI. NEXUS criteria senstivity of 99.6% for ruling out CSI
Detected 99.0% of ALL cspine injuries
Unlike ccr, nexus does not have age cut offs and is theoretically application to all patients. However literature suggest caution when applying to &gt;65 yoa as sensitibity 66-84%
One trial to prospective head to head complarison of nexus to ccr and ccr was found to have superior sensitvity 99.$ vs 90.7. also there is increasing sway towards using ct as a more appropriate imaging modality in this patient population
[5] Sundstrøm T, et al. Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review.
Review article J Neurotrauma. 2014.
So once we have clarified that we need to image the patient, what imaging should we perform?
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends using an adapted version of the Canadian cervical spine rules that incorporates some aspects of the NEXUS rule to identify patients who need imaging of the cervical spine
A standard series of X-rays of the cervical spine consists of three views: anteroposterior, lateral and anteroposterior odontoid peg views.
The lateral view must show the top of the T1 vertebral body, and the odontoid peg view should show the lateral masses of the atlanto-axial articulation.
In children aged &lt;10, use anterior/posterior and lateral radiographs without an anterior/posterior peg view, and use CT imaging to clarify abnormalities or uncertainties.
The following patients should have plain radiography (three views) of the cervical spine:[6]
Patients with neck pain or midline tenderness if aged ≥65 years, or any age if there was a dangerous mechanism of injury (see &apos;Risk factors for severe injury&apos;, above).
Patients where a definitive diagnosis of cervical spine injury is needed urgently (eg, before surgery).
Any patients where it is considered unsafe to assess movement.
[6] Wee B, Reynolds JH, Bleetman A; Imaging after trauma to the neck. BMJ. 2008 Jan 19;336(7636):154-7.
Triage - assessment - investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children and adults; NICE Clinical Guideline Sept 2007
The patient had a Glasgow coma scale &lt;13 on initial assessment
The patient has been intubated, or is being scanned for multi-region trauma
If clinical suspicion of injury continues despite a normal radiograph
CT is superior to plain radiography, with a reported sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 99%.
[6] Wee B, Reynolds JH, Bleetman A; Imaging after trauma to the neck. BMJ. 2008 Jan 19;336(7636):154-7.
Triage - assessment - investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children and adults; NICE Clinical Guideline (September 2007)
MRI depicts soft tissue structures well, with reported sensitivities for intervertebral disc injury of 93%,
posterior longitudinal ligament injury of 93%,
and interspinous ligament injury of 100%.[5]
MRI is indicated for patients with neurological signs, even if plain films are negative.
MRI can distinguish haematoma from oedema, which can have prognostic importance.
[6] Wee B, Reynolds JH, Bleetman A; Imaging after trauma to the neck. BMJ. 2008 Jan 19;336(7636):154-7.
Triage - assessment - investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children and adults; NICE Clinical Guideline (September 2007)
At this point it is important to remember the potential devastating effects SCIs.
So back to our patient. On xray she was diagnosed with c7 fracture, t1 spinous process fracture and t7 vertebral body compression fracture.
So how was our patient managed…
Initially she was put in full spinal precautions with c-spine collar/immobilization and log rolling
A full history and examination was taken and neurology was reassuringly normal
4 hourly neurology observations were taken
And some further imaging was performed including a ct cervico-thoracic spine and full mri spine
CT imaging showed C7 bilateral lamina fractures. The left fracture line extends into the left facet joint. Importantly there is no dislocation
Minimally displaced C7 and T1 spinous process fractures are seen with no associated soft tissue swelling
Compression wedge fracture of T7 with 25% loss of height anteriorly.
Minimally displaced C7 and T1 spinous process fractures are seen with no associated soft tissue swelling
Compression wedge fracture of T7 with 25% loss of height anteriorly.
Here the MRI is highlighting the fractures at C7/ T1 and T7 are highlighted
Here you can see the stylish aspen collar…
So what is the evidence for the cspine collar
The cervical collar has been routinely used for trauma patients for more than 30 years and is the standard of care in the emergency medical service.
However, the existing evidence for this practice is limited: Randomized, controlled trials are largely missing, and there are uncertain effects on mortality, neurological injury, and spinal stability. Even more concerning, there is a growing body of evidence and opinion against the use of collars
[5] undstrøm T, et al. Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review.
J Neurotrauma. 2014.
The American Association of neurological surgeons produced guideline for the mx of acute cervical spine and scis which highlight why we use the collar.
During the 1970s the majority of patients referred to regional SCI centres arrived with complete neurological lesions. In the 1980s, however the majority of scis arrived with incomplete lesions. This improvement in the neurological statys of patients has been attributed to the the development of EMS initiated in 1971 and introduction of the hard collar.
[6] Guidelines for the Management of Acute Cervical Spine and Spinal Cord Injuries. American Association of Neurological Surgeons. May 2001. Full guidelines.
[
But hey it’s a harmless intervention so why wouldn’t we use collars.
Wrong….
Cspine collars can lead to
Ulcers
Raised icp
Believed that in fact they may worsen fractures
Cause more problems and aggravate the combative intoxicated patient
Difficult airway management – trying to intubate a collared patient is not an easy feat!
Painful – study showed that in a group of people told to wear collar 100% complained of pain after 30 minutes
Also with increased cost and time it is not going to be conducive to the 4 hr rule!!!
One interesting article addresses the case of the cervical collar. It is a review article in the Scandinavian journal of trauma by benger et al and addresses some of the “myths of the cervical collar
Myth 1
Of course, trauma patients may have an unstable cervical spine injury. But the incidence seems to be low. In two studies on trauma patients who were considered at high risk of head and neck trauma, they found an incidence of 0,7% for significant cervical spine injury.
Myth 2
In a patient cohort with confirmed cervical vertebral injury, 8% of them did not have their spine immobilised – but outcome did not differ.
In a study comparing the incidence of neck injuries in a first world country where cervical collars are applied, to a third world country without collars, there was no difference in the incidence of neurological injuries from the cervical spine
Myth 3
I don’t know if you have every applied or seen a collared patient but the collar is pretty useless at stabilising the neck. Even a perfectly apllied collar allows for at least 30 degrees of flexion/extension/rotation.
Myth 4
Just out the collar on to be on the safe side….Well as mentioned before there are risks with the collar….
In a cadaver study where they inflicted neck injury on the cadavers and then place a semi rigid collar around the neck, radiological studies showed that the collar increased the fracture crease by over 7 mm! The conclusion was that a cervical collar on these patients probably would have made the neck injury worse.
The collar we put on millions of trauma patients every year has no proven benefit, no proven protection against secondary injuries. Still, we put it on with the A in ABC and take focus and time from more important interventions. For the patient with a high suspicion of spine injury, careful handling is needed – but not a cervical collar. For all other trauma patients, they will more than likely be better off without the collar.
[7] Benger et al. Why do we put cervical collars on conscious trauma patients? SJTREM, 2009. Full text.
So what are the take home messages from this case…..