TOTAL
PHYSICAL
RESPONSE
JESSA I. CERBITO
Reporter
Developed by James Asher, a
Professor Emeritus of
Psychology at San José State
University the first public
institution of higher learning
in California, founded in 1857.
Developed the total physical
response method as a result
of his observation of the
language development of
young children.
TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR)
Based on the theory that the memory is
enhanced through association with physical
movement.
It is based on the coordination of language
and physical movement.
The method is an example of the
comprehension approach to language
teaching.
T M
H A
R A
E I
E N
H
Y
P
O
T
H
E
S
E
S
The brain is naturally predisposed to learn
language through listening.
Effective language learning must engage
the right hemisphere of the brain.
Language learning should not involve any
stress, as stress and negative emotions
inhibit the natural language-learning
process.
P
R
I
N
C
I
P
L
E
S
Total physical response is an example of the
comprehension approach to language
teaching.
The ultimate goal of the method is to
develop oral fluency.
Total physical response is both a teaching
technique and a philosophy of language
teaching.
P
R
O
C
E
D
U
R
E
The majority of class time in
TPR lessons is spent doing drills in
which the instructor gives commands
using the imperative mood. Students
respond to these commands with
physical actions. Initially, students
learn the meaning of the commands
they hear by direct observation. After
they learn the meaning of the words
in these commands, the teacher issues
commands that use novel
combinations of the words
the students have learned.
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
 It is fun and easy.
 It does not require a
great deal of
preparation on the
part of the teacher.
 It is a good tool for
learning vocabulary.
 Class size does not
need to be a problem.
 There is no age
barrier.
 It is not a very creative
method. Students are not
given the opportunity to
express their own views
and thoughts in a creative
way.
 It is limited, since
everything cannot be
explained with this method.
It must be combined with
other approaches.
APPLICATION
ACTION STORY
SONG
TOES
KNEES
SHOULDER
HEAD
GAME
(Simon Says)
CHARADES
TOTAL PHYSICAL
RESPONSE
THANK YOU!

Total Physical Response

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Developed by JamesAsher, a Professor Emeritus of Psychology at San José State University the first public institution of higher learning in California, founded in 1857. Developed the total physical response method as a result of his observation of the language development of young children.
  • 3.
    TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE(TPR) Based on the theory that the memory is enhanced through association with physical movement. It is based on the coordination of language and physical movement. The method is an example of the comprehension approach to language teaching.
  • 4.
    T M H A RA E I E N H Y P O T H E S E S The brain is naturally predisposed to learn language through listening. Effective language learning must engage the right hemisphere of the brain. Language learning should not involve any stress, as stress and negative emotions inhibit the natural language-learning process.
  • 5.
    P R I N C I P L E S Total physical responseis an example of the comprehension approach to language teaching. The ultimate goal of the method is to develop oral fluency. Total physical response is both a teaching technique and a philosophy of language teaching.
  • 6.
    P R O C E D U R E The majority ofclass time in TPR lessons is spent doing drills in which the instructor gives commands using the imperative mood. Students respond to these commands with physical actions. Initially, students learn the meaning of the commands they hear by direct observation. After they learn the meaning of the words in these commands, the teacher issues commands that use novel combinations of the words the students have learned.
  • 7.
    ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES  Itis fun and easy.  It does not require a great deal of preparation on the part of the teacher.  It is a good tool for learning vocabulary.  Class size does not need to be a problem.  There is no age barrier.  It is not a very creative method. Students are not given the opportunity to express their own views and thoughts in a creative way.  It is limited, since everything cannot be explained with this method. It must be combined with other approaches.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 15.