Theories of
By RALPH NICOLE A. SEVILLA
Theory of Learning
• Theories of learning are
set of conjectures and
hypotheses that explain
the process of learning
or how learning takes
place.
Definitions of Learning
1.Ornstein (1990)
Learning is a reflective
process wherby the
learner either develops
new insights and
understanding or changes
and restructures his
mental process.
2. Lardizabal (1991)
Learning is an integrated,
on-going process occurring
within the individual,
enabling him to meet
specific aims, fulfill his needs
and interests, and cope
with the learning process.
3. Slavin (1995)
Learning is a change in an
individual caused by
experience.
4. Calderon (1998)
Learning is the acquisition through
maturation and experience of new and
more knowledge, skills, and attitudes
that will enable the learner to make
better and more adequate reactions,
responses, and adjustments to new
situations.
How about you,
how do you
define learning?
Behavioral Theories
of Learning
Behavioral Theories of Learning
• Behavioral learning theories help us
to explain much of human behavior,
particularly observable behavior.
1. Pavlov’s Classical Conditioning Theory
In the late 1800s and early 1900s, Pavlov and
his colleagues studies the digestive process in
dogs. During the research, the scientists noticed
changes in the timing and rate of salivation of
these animals. Pavlov observed that if meat
powder was placed in or near the mouth of a
hungry dog, the dog would salivate.
Because the meat powder provoked this
response automatically without any prior
training or conditioning the meat powder is
referred to as an unconditioned stimulus.
Similarly, because salivation occurred
automatically in the presence of meat, also
without the need for any training of
experience, this response of salivating is
referred to as an unconditioned response.
Pavlov’s experiments showed that if a
previously neutral stimulus (ringing of the bell)
is paired with an unconditioned stimulus, the
neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned
stimulus and gains the power to prompt a
response similar to that produced by the
unconditioned stimulus.
Principles of Classical Conditioning
a. Generalization appears to explain the transfer of
a response to a situation other than that in which
the original learning occurred.
b. Discrimination refers to the process by which we
learn not to respond to similar stimuli in an
identical manner.
c. Extinction refers to the process by which
conditioned responses are lost.
2. Thorndike’s S-R Theory
Thorndike, like many of the early behavioral
learning theorists, linked behavior to physical
reflexes. In his early work he also viewed most
behavior as a response to stimuli in the
environment. This view that stimuli can
prompt responses was the forerunner of what
became known as stimulus-response (S-R)
theory.
Thorndike went beyond Pavlov by showing that
stimuli that occurred after a behavior had an
influence on future behaviors. In many of his
experiments, Throndike placed cats in boxes
from which they had to escape to get food. He
observed that over time, the cats learned how
to get out of the box more and more quickly by
repeating the behaviors that led to escape and
not repeating the behaviors that were
ineffective.
Laws of Learning by Thorndike
a. Law of Effect
It states that if an act is followed by a
satisfying change in the environment,
the likelihood that the act will be
repeated in similar situations increases.
b. Law of Readiness
It states that when an organism, both human
and animal, is ready to form connections to do so
is satisfying and not to do so is annoying.
c. Law of Exercise
It states that any connection is strengthened in
proportion to the number of times it occurs and
in proportion to the average vigor and duration
of the connection.
3. B.F. Skinner’s Operant Conditioning Theory
He proposed that reflective behavior accounts for
only a small proportion of all actions. He
proposed another class of behavior, which he
labeled operant behaviors because they operate
on the environment in the apparent absence of
any unconditioned stimuli, such as food. The use
of pleasant and unpleasant consequences to
change behavior is often referred to as operant
conditioning.
The operant conditioning theory was based on
Skinner’s experiment with a hungry rat that was
placed in a box. Upon its accidental pressing of a
lever in the box, it was rewarded with a food
pellet which served as reinforcement to the
reinforcing behavior. Reinforced thus, the rat kept
on pressing that bar, this time no longer
accidentally but intentionally. Skinner has shown
that basic to operant conditioning is the use of
reinforcement.
• Reinforcement
- It is defined as any behavioural
consequence that strengthens a
behavior. It refers to any event that
increases the probability that a
particular response will increase in
frequency.
2 Forms of Reinforcers
a. Positive reinforcers (Presentation)
- These are events that are presented after a
response has been performed and that
increases the behavior or activity they follow.
b. Negative reinforcers (Removal)
- These are escapes from unpleasant situations
or ways of preventing something unpleasant
from occurring.
4. Social Learning Theory
This theory is a major outgrowth of the behavioural
learning theory tradition. Developed by Albert
Bandura, the social learning theory accepts most of the
principles of behavioural theories but focuses to a much
greater degree on the effects of cues on behavior and
on internal mental processes, emphasizing the effects of
thought on action and action on thought. Bandura felt
that much of human learning is not shaped by his
consequences but is more efficiently learned directly
from a model.
Bandura’s Model of Observational Learning
a. Attention. An observer must attend to and
recognize the distinctive features of the model’s
response because mere exposure to a model
does not ensure acquisition of behavior.
b. Retention. Reproduction of the desired behavior
implies that a student symbolically retains the
observed behavior.
c. Reproduction. Bandura believes that symbolic
coding produces internal models of the
environment that guide the observer’s future
behavior.
d. Motivation. Although an observer acquires and
retains the ability to perform modelled behavior,
there will be no overt performances unless
conditions are favorable.
REFERENCE
Vega, V.A. & Prieto, N.G., (2006), Facilitating
Learning, Mandaluyung City, Philippines

Theories of learning

  • 1.
    Theories of By RALPHNICOLE A. SEVILLA
  • 2.
    Theory of Learning •Theories of learning are set of conjectures and hypotheses that explain the process of learning or how learning takes place.
  • 3.
    Definitions of Learning 1.Ornstein(1990) Learning is a reflective process wherby the learner either develops new insights and understanding or changes and restructures his mental process.
  • 4.
    2. Lardizabal (1991) Learningis an integrated, on-going process occurring within the individual, enabling him to meet specific aims, fulfill his needs and interests, and cope with the learning process.
  • 5.
    3. Slavin (1995) Learningis a change in an individual caused by experience.
  • 6.
    4. Calderon (1998) Learningis the acquisition through maturation and experience of new and more knowledge, skills, and attitudes that will enable the learner to make better and more adequate reactions, responses, and adjustments to new situations.
  • 7.
    How about you, howdo you define learning?
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Behavioral Theories ofLearning • Behavioral learning theories help us to explain much of human behavior, particularly observable behavior.
  • 10.
    1. Pavlov’s ClassicalConditioning Theory In the late 1800s and early 1900s, Pavlov and his colleagues studies the digestive process in dogs. During the research, the scientists noticed changes in the timing and rate of salivation of these animals. Pavlov observed that if meat powder was placed in or near the mouth of a hungry dog, the dog would salivate.
  • 11.
    Because the meatpowder provoked this response automatically without any prior training or conditioning the meat powder is referred to as an unconditioned stimulus. Similarly, because salivation occurred automatically in the presence of meat, also without the need for any training of experience, this response of salivating is referred to as an unconditioned response.
  • 12.
    Pavlov’s experiments showedthat if a previously neutral stimulus (ringing of the bell) is paired with an unconditioned stimulus, the neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus and gains the power to prompt a response similar to that produced by the unconditioned stimulus.
  • 14.
    Principles of ClassicalConditioning a. Generalization appears to explain the transfer of a response to a situation other than that in which the original learning occurred. b. Discrimination refers to the process by which we learn not to respond to similar stimuli in an identical manner. c. Extinction refers to the process by which conditioned responses are lost.
  • 15.
    2. Thorndike’s S-RTheory Thorndike, like many of the early behavioral learning theorists, linked behavior to physical reflexes. In his early work he also viewed most behavior as a response to stimuli in the environment. This view that stimuli can prompt responses was the forerunner of what became known as stimulus-response (S-R) theory.
  • 16.
    Thorndike went beyondPavlov by showing that stimuli that occurred after a behavior had an influence on future behaviors. In many of his experiments, Throndike placed cats in boxes from which they had to escape to get food. He observed that over time, the cats learned how to get out of the box more and more quickly by repeating the behaviors that led to escape and not repeating the behaviors that were ineffective.
  • 18.
    Laws of Learningby Thorndike a. Law of Effect It states that if an act is followed by a satisfying change in the environment, the likelihood that the act will be repeated in similar situations increases.
  • 19.
    b. Law ofReadiness It states that when an organism, both human and animal, is ready to form connections to do so is satisfying and not to do so is annoying. c. Law of Exercise It states that any connection is strengthened in proportion to the number of times it occurs and in proportion to the average vigor and duration of the connection.
  • 20.
    3. B.F. Skinner’sOperant Conditioning Theory He proposed that reflective behavior accounts for only a small proportion of all actions. He proposed another class of behavior, which he labeled operant behaviors because they operate on the environment in the apparent absence of any unconditioned stimuli, such as food. The use of pleasant and unpleasant consequences to change behavior is often referred to as operant conditioning.
  • 21.
    The operant conditioningtheory was based on Skinner’s experiment with a hungry rat that was placed in a box. Upon its accidental pressing of a lever in the box, it was rewarded with a food pellet which served as reinforcement to the reinforcing behavior. Reinforced thus, the rat kept on pressing that bar, this time no longer accidentally but intentionally. Skinner has shown that basic to operant conditioning is the use of reinforcement.
  • 22.
    • Reinforcement - Itis defined as any behavioural consequence that strengthens a behavior. It refers to any event that increases the probability that a particular response will increase in frequency.
  • 23.
    2 Forms ofReinforcers a. Positive reinforcers (Presentation) - These are events that are presented after a response has been performed and that increases the behavior or activity they follow. b. Negative reinforcers (Removal) - These are escapes from unpleasant situations or ways of preventing something unpleasant from occurring.
  • 24.
    4. Social LearningTheory This theory is a major outgrowth of the behavioural learning theory tradition. Developed by Albert Bandura, the social learning theory accepts most of the principles of behavioural theories but focuses to a much greater degree on the effects of cues on behavior and on internal mental processes, emphasizing the effects of thought on action and action on thought. Bandura felt that much of human learning is not shaped by his consequences but is more efficiently learned directly from a model.
  • 25.
    Bandura’s Model ofObservational Learning a. Attention. An observer must attend to and recognize the distinctive features of the model’s response because mere exposure to a model does not ensure acquisition of behavior. b. Retention. Reproduction of the desired behavior implies that a student symbolically retains the observed behavior.
  • 26.
    c. Reproduction. Bandurabelieves that symbolic coding produces internal models of the environment that guide the observer’s future behavior. d. Motivation. Although an observer acquires and retains the ability to perform modelled behavior, there will be no overt performances unless conditions are favorable.
  • 27.
    REFERENCE Vega, V.A. &Prieto, N.G., (2006), Facilitating Learning, Mandaluyung City, Philippines

Editor's Notes

  • #3 An opinion or idea formed without sufficient evidence Hypothesis is idea that is not proven but that leads to further study or discussion
  • #4 Think deeply, metacognition
  • #5 Connection with other sources of learning
  • #6 Personal or vicarious experinces
  • #7 Mentally and emotionally
  • #12 Stimulus something that causes a change or behavior
  • #15 Experience of an older brother, about a teacher who is terror When able to realze that the teacher is not terror when experienced himself He has no fear of the teacher at all
  • #19 If the teacher praises the child to recite, the child will recite again.
  • #20 Give the child a chance to play, and after playing let him engage in learning He is used of being praised because he draws
  • #24 Giving praises, rewards, A child who does not want to do the dishes may just want to do his assignments to escape from the duty.
  • #26 observe, I like to be a doctor, a police, a teacher (watch probinsiyano who holds a gun Make internal images in their brains (dream and even tell it to the people his parents
  • #27 c. When he sees a playmate he might play as a police and fighting against the criminal d. Extrinsic (behaves well to receive a toy gun) and intrinsic motivation (inspired to take criminology in college)