Theories of First Language
         Learning




                         1
Questions

• Why do children learn their first language in a
  short time?
• Why do children learn their first language in
  sequences and stages?
• How do children learn the rules of their first
  language when what is heard is variable?
• Why do children produce language that they
  have never heard?

                                                    2
Behaviorism in general

• Learning is habit formation




                                3
Behaviorism in language learning

• Language learning is also habit
  formation
• Successful performance of a behavior
  • Good pronunciation
  • Grammatically correct sentences
  • New words
• Leads to reward from parents
• Finally, behavior becomes automatic
                                         4
Evaluation of behaviorism 1

• Habit formation takes a long time
  • The same process must be repeated over
    and over again for each grammar feature and
    word
• Habit formation would result in variation
  • What each child hears is unique so what she
    learns should be unique.
  • However, we observe sequences and stages

                                                  5
Evaluation of behaviorism 2

• Habit formation requires uniform language
  to be successful
  • Language is not uniform; it is variable
• Children only imitate what they hear
  • Children, however, produce unique words
    and sentences



                                              6
Evaluation of behaviorism 3

• Behaviorism doesn’t answer our four
  questions
• Thus, behaviorism doesn’t seem to be a
  good explanation of how children learn
  languages




                                           7
Universal Grammar

• Language Acquisition Device (LAD) is an
  internal innate ability to process
  languages
• LAD is like a computer
• There is no LAD in the brain; it’s an idea to
  explain the theory



                                              8
Universal Grammar

• UG is a set of principles that are
  common to all languages
  • Not a set of grammar rules
  • For example, UG tells us that all languages
    use word order and hearing the language tells
    children which word order to use
• UG is like software for a computer


                                                9
Evaluation of Universal Grammar 1


• UG makes it simple for children to
  discover rules
  • Thus, language learning doesn’t take a lot of
    time
• UG is an innate set of principles
  • Because UG is the same for everyone,
    sequences and stages are likely


                                                    10
Evaluation of Universal Grammar 2


• UG operates like a computer program and
  tells children what is possible and not
  possible
  • Children can still construct rules even though
    language is variable
• UG helps children create rules
  • Rules allow children to be creative and make
    words they’ve never heard before

                                                   11
Evaluation of Universal Grammar 3


• UG is a powerful explanation of how
  children learn grammar
• UG doesn’t explain how children learn
  words or how to use language socially




                                          12
Cognitive Development

• The way the we see and understand the
  world develops in stages.




                                          13
Cognitive Development &
Language learning

• Children learn language by making
  connections between what they hear and
  objects, events and situations
• Children put the connections that they
  make in categories and make
  generalizations



                                           14
Cognitive Theory

• Language learning is part of a
  child’s cognitive development
• Language ability and cognitive
  development are not separate
• How much language children can
  understand depends on their cognitive
  development.

                                          15
Evaluation of the Cognitive Theory 1

• Cognitive abilities develop quickly, and so
  do language abilities
• Cognitive abilities develop in stages, and
  so do language abilities
• Making categories and generalizations
  lets children overcome variability
• Making generalizations leads to new
  language

                                            16
Evaluation of the Cognitive Theory 2


• The cognitive theory is a good explanation
  of how children learn vocabulary
• The cognitive theory is less satisfactory in
  explaining how children learn grammar
  • Grammatical features with several meanings
     • I’m writing now.
     • I’m living in Paris, but I usually live in London.
     • I’m playing tennis tomorrow.

                                                            17
Functional Theory 1

• Learning occurs by listening to
  people and speaking with people




                                    18
Functional Theory 2

• Listening is a chance to understand what
  is heard
• Speaking is a chance to
  • Send a message
  • Check one’s understanding
  • Learn how to express messages
    grammatically


                                             19
Evaluation of the Functional Theory 1


• Not all parents talk a lot; some more than
  others
  • All children learn to speak in about the same
    time
• Conversations with children are all unique
  • Because they are unique, it is difficult to
    explain sequences and stages


                                                    20
Evaluation of the Functional Theory 2


• Language is variable
  • Checks for comprehension by both parents
    and children help make rules clear
• The functional theory provides no
  explanation for why children produce
  words they’ve never heard



                                               21
Conclusion 1

• Language is complicated
• Difficult for one theory to explain how we
  learn all aspects of language
• Each of the theories explains some
  aspects of language




                                               22
Conclusion 2

• Behaviorism – sociolinguistic knowledge
  • Many aspects of being polite are learned
    habits.
  • When to say please and thank you.
• Universal Grammar – grammatical
  knowledge
  • An innate computer program perhaps best
    explains how we master grammar

                                               23
Conclusion 3

• Cognitive – Vocabulary
  • When we look at the world, we tend to
    categorize and generalize about what we see
    and this is the same thing that we do with
    new words.
• Functional – How to talk
  • Babies talking with their parents learn
    conversation rules.
  • They learn to talk by talking
                                              24

Theories of first language learning

  • 1.
    Theories of FirstLanguage Learning 1
  • 2.
    Questions • Why dochildren learn their first language in a short time? • Why do children learn their first language in sequences and stages? • How do children learn the rules of their first language when what is heard is variable? • Why do children produce language that they have never heard? 2
  • 3.
    Behaviorism in general •Learning is habit formation 3
  • 4.
    Behaviorism in languagelearning • Language learning is also habit formation • Successful performance of a behavior • Good pronunciation • Grammatically correct sentences • New words • Leads to reward from parents • Finally, behavior becomes automatic 4
  • 5.
    Evaluation of behaviorism1 • Habit formation takes a long time • The same process must be repeated over and over again for each grammar feature and word • Habit formation would result in variation • What each child hears is unique so what she learns should be unique. • However, we observe sequences and stages 5
  • 6.
    Evaluation of behaviorism2 • Habit formation requires uniform language to be successful • Language is not uniform; it is variable • Children only imitate what they hear • Children, however, produce unique words and sentences 6
  • 7.
    Evaluation of behaviorism3 • Behaviorism doesn’t answer our four questions • Thus, behaviorism doesn’t seem to be a good explanation of how children learn languages 7
  • 8.
    Universal Grammar • LanguageAcquisition Device (LAD) is an internal innate ability to process languages • LAD is like a computer • There is no LAD in the brain; it’s an idea to explain the theory 8
  • 9.
    Universal Grammar • UGis a set of principles that are common to all languages • Not a set of grammar rules • For example, UG tells us that all languages use word order and hearing the language tells children which word order to use • UG is like software for a computer 9
  • 10.
    Evaluation of UniversalGrammar 1 • UG makes it simple for children to discover rules • Thus, language learning doesn’t take a lot of time • UG is an innate set of principles • Because UG is the same for everyone, sequences and stages are likely 10
  • 11.
    Evaluation of UniversalGrammar 2 • UG operates like a computer program and tells children what is possible and not possible • Children can still construct rules even though language is variable • UG helps children create rules • Rules allow children to be creative and make words they’ve never heard before 11
  • 12.
    Evaluation of UniversalGrammar 3 • UG is a powerful explanation of how children learn grammar • UG doesn’t explain how children learn words or how to use language socially 12
  • 13.
    Cognitive Development • Theway the we see and understand the world develops in stages. 13
  • 14.
    Cognitive Development & Languagelearning • Children learn language by making connections between what they hear and objects, events and situations • Children put the connections that they make in categories and make generalizations 14
  • 15.
    Cognitive Theory • Languagelearning is part of a child’s cognitive development • Language ability and cognitive development are not separate • How much language children can understand depends on their cognitive development. 15
  • 16.
    Evaluation of theCognitive Theory 1 • Cognitive abilities develop quickly, and so do language abilities • Cognitive abilities develop in stages, and so do language abilities • Making categories and generalizations lets children overcome variability • Making generalizations leads to new language 16
  • 17.
    Evaluation of theCognitive Theory 2 • The cognitive theory is a good explanation of how children learn vocabulary • The cognitive theory is less satisfactory in explaining how children learn grammar • Grammatical features with several meanings • I’m writing now. • I’m living in Paris, but I usually live in London. • I’m playing tennis tomorrow. 17
  • 18.
    Functional Theory 1 •Learning occurs by listening to people and speaking with people 18
  • 19.
    Functional Theory 2 •Listening is a chance to understand what is heard • Speaking is a chance to • Send a message • Check one’s understanding • Learn how to express messages grammatically 19
  • 20.
    Evaluation of theFunctional Theory 1 • Not all parents talk a lot; some more than others • All children learn to speak in about the same time • Conversations with children are all unique • Because they are unique, it is difficult to explain sequences and stages 20
  • 21.
    Evaluation of theFunctional Theory 2 • Language is variable • Checks for comprehension by both parents and children help make rules clear • The functional theory provides no explanation for why children produce words they’ve never heard 21
  • 22.
    Conclusion 1 • Languageis complicated • Difficult for one theory to explain how we learn all aspects of language • Each of the theories explains some aspects of language 22
  • 23.
    Conclusion 2 • Behaviorism– sociolinguistic knowledge • Many aspects of being polite are learned habits. • When to say please and thank you. • Universal Grammar – grammatical knowledge • An innate computer program perhaps best explains how we master grammar 23
  • 24.
    Conclusion 3 • Cognitive– Vocabulary • When we look at the world, we tend to categorize and generalize about what we see and this is the same thing that we do with new words. • Functional – How to talk • Babies talking with their parents learn conversation rules. • They learn to talk by talking 24

Editor's Notes

  • #4 Here the habit has been learned. The rat knows that to obtain food, it has to press the lever. If you have ever trained a dog or any other pet to do a trick, you have probably used habit formation.
  • #6 2 – It would not lead to sequences
  • #9 LAD is not a real device and it is not one place in the brain. It is an idea to help describe the theory. Analogy – computer   = LAD and software = UG
  • #10 Distinguish sounds Tell what is possible Able to discover grammatical relationships Construct simplest grammar rules
  • #16 Show Cognitive Development video clip of Piaget Stage 2
  • #18 the present progressive tense, be doing , is used to describe an action that is taking place at the moment of speaking ( I'm writing now ), to describe a present situation that is temporary ( I'm living in Paris, but I usually live in London ) and to describe future plans ( I'm playing tennis tomorrow ).
  • #20 Show video clip of child talking