The Solar System Machine Moves Completely Different From Newton Theory

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
The Solar System Machine Moves Completely Different From Newton Theory
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo –Egypt –10th
July 2021
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The solar planets move by a force different completely from The Sun Mass Gravity.
Newton Theory is created out of imagination
Paper Hypothesis
The Inner Planets Move By An Electric Field
The Outer Planets Move By The Transportation Of Motion From the inner planets.
These facts are proved by the following 5 proves:
(1) Planet Motion Depends On Its neighbor Planet Motion And Not On The Sun
(2) The Outer Planets Motions are distinguish from the inner planets motions in
their geometrical features. Which proves that both types of motions can't be
created by the same one force.
(3) The Distances Equality in the solar system proves that planet motion doesn't
depend on the sun gravity force, on the contrary it depends on Its neighbor
planet motion. (Appendix no. 1)
(4) The solar planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion. this
unified motion be similar to the train carriages motion. and the unified general
motion proves that Planet motion depends on Its neighbor planet motion and
not on the sun.
(5) The Planets Motion Dependency shows a clear trajectory of energy passes
through the solar system. This energy trajectory starts from the inner planets to
Jupiter to Uranus to Pluto and then to Neptune and again to the inner planets.

I do this research
2nd
2
The energy trajectory proves that planet motion depends on Its neighbor planet
motion and not on the sun.
Please scan the figure (ORCID)

I do this research
2nd
3
Contents
Subject Page No.
1- Introduction 4
2- Methodology 5
3- The Machine Motor Description 8
3-1 Preface 8
3-2 The Machine Motor Description 9
4- The Inner Planets Motions 14
4-1 Preface 14
4-2 The Inner Planets Motions 16
5- Proof No. 1 (Planet Motion Depends On Its Neighbor) 21
5-1 Preface 21
5-2 Planet Orbital Distance Equation 22
5-3 Jupiter Orbital Circumference Analysis 26
6-Proof No. 2 (The Distances Equality Wide Using In The Solar System) 29
6-1 Preface 29
6-2 The Equal distances in the solar system 30
7- Proof No. 2 (The Planets Motions Create One Unified General Motion) 34
7-1 The Unified Motion Proof Idea 34
7-2 The planets motions is a complementary motion 36
7-3 The planets motions is a team motion (or unified motion) 40
8- The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time 44
8-1 Preface 44
8-2 Earth And Pluto Rate Of Time 46
8-3 Mercury Motion Rate Of Time 56
8-4 Saturn Motion Rate Of Time 60
9- Proof No.4 (The Energy Trajectory Analysis) 63
9-1 Preface 63
9-2 The Inner Planets Motions (A Summary) 64
9-3 Jupiter Motion depends on the inner planets motions 64
9-4 Jupiter Motion transports the energy to the outer Planets 65
9-5 Jupiter Energy reaches to Pluto 66
10- Proof No. 5 (The Inner And Outer Planets Motions Are Distinguish) 70
10-1 The Energy Transportation from the inner planets to Jupiter 70
10-2 There Are 2 different types of Motions 71
Appendix No.1 The Solar System Equal Distances List 75
Appendix No.2 (Planet Gravity Equation) 77
Appendix No.3 (The Outer Planet Orbital Circumference Analysis) 78
References and Biography

I do this research
2nd
4
1-Introduction
- Why Does This Paper Provide A Heavy Claim?
- Newton had supposed that, The Sun Mass Gravity causes the planet motion.
- The idea be acceptable.
- The next question be (By What Mechanism The Sun Mass Gravity Cause The
Planet Motion?)
- Through 400 years, the scientists have tried to find an answer for this question.
- One great try to do this task is the general relativity which provides an interesting
mechanism to explain how the sun mass cause a planet to move
- But, let's ask (Does The Sun Mass Gravity Cause The Planet Motion? is it a fact?)
- The fact is NOT
- The Planet Motion Depends On Its Neighbor Planet Motion And Doesn’t
Depend On The Sun.
- That’s why the paper provides a heavy claim. Because
- If planet motion depends on its neighbor planet motion and not on the sun, In this
case, Newton Concept for the Sun Mass Gravity will be removed from the physics
book and also the general relativity may face the same fate
- The point is that,
- The machine uses a different motor from what Newton theory tells about.
- The machine different motor is proved by Planets Motions data
- Let's consider the paper contents
- Point No. (3) provides The Machine Real Motor Description
- Point No. (4) provides The Inner Planets Motions supposed Motor
- Point no. (5) provides the first proof for the paper hypothesis
- Point no. (6) provides the second proof for the paper hypothesis
- Points no. (7) and (8) provides the third proof for the paper hypothesis
- Point no. (9) provides the fourth proof for the paper hypothesis
- Point no. (10) provides the fifth proof for the paper hypothesis

I do this research
2nd
5
2-Methodology
(I)
- I use Planets Data Analysis to discover the solar planets creation and motion.
- This method put planets data in comparison with physics theory trying to know if
the theory is sufficient to explain the planets motions data.
- The method is useful because it creates questions and shows the consistency or
inconsistency between planets motions data and the theory
(II)
- This method also tries to discover how the planet get its data. So, questions (why
the moon diameter =3475 km?) be usual question. The method tries to know if the
planet data be created based on any geometrical reason or by an effect of other
planets or any other force.
- The vision tells, Planet moves depending on its data, by that, the research method
tries to discover the relationship between planet motion and its data, for example it
tries to answer the question (If a planet velocity changes what data will be changed
as a result?).
(III)
- The research method considers planet data be very useful source of knowledge for
planet motion explanation. Let's use one example to explain that
Example no. (1)
- The solar planets order contradicts the gravitation equation strongly, when we
asked why? the answer was because of (The Initial Conditions)!!
- Jupiter occupies the order no (5) in the solar system, and the 3 planets (Earth –
Venus – Mercury) shows that greater mass needs longer orbital distance and not
shorter. And even Uranus (less mass) be more near to the sun than Neptune
(greater) mass. these are clear contradictions with the gravitation equation. Why
the equation be acceptable spite?! Because of (The Initial Conditions)!!
- And what are these (The Initial Conditions)?!

I do this research
2nd
6
- The planets positions be inherited through the history. These positions restricted
the planets and prevented them to correct their positions to follow the gravitation
equation. This answer simply disregards the planet motion, because it considers
the planet motion has no any effect on this planet data.
- I want to say, not only the answer is wrong. But the answer also shows that, no
attention is paid for the planet data as if the plant motion be done regardless any
planet data. and that's the wrong concept. Because the fact is that, planet does its
motion depending on its data. And based on that,
- Planet data be (modified) according to this planet motion (modification).
Example no. (2)
- The Diameter =12430
- There's no a planet in the solar group its diameter =12430 km, this number I have
invented it.
- The idea behind this diameter is, We try to know if Planets Data be created
independently from other planets data or dependent on each other.
o The (supposed) diameter 12430 km in the one middle value between Venus
diameter (12104 km) and Earth diameter (12756 km).
o (Earth diameter / its moon diameter) = (Jupiter diameter) / (12430 x π)
o Mars (24.1 km/s) moves during (12430 seconds) a distance = 300000 km =
light (0.3 mkm/s) motion distance for 1 second.
o Saturn (13.1 km/s) moves during (12430 seconds) a distance = 120536 km
= Saturn Diameter
- The data shows that, the number (12430 km) is in harmony with other planets data.
and behaves as any other (real) planet diameter. the following data supports this
conclusion
o Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 sec a distance = 142984 km (=
Jupiter diameter) where (10921 km = the Earth moon circumference)

I do this research
2nd
7
o Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 7510 sec a distance = 51118 km (=Uranus
diameter) where (7510 km = Pluto circumference)
o Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 10921 sec a distance = 51118 km (=Uranus
Diameter) where (10921 km = The Earth Moon Circumference)
o Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 51118 sec a distance = 2 x 120536 km
(=Saturn Diameter)
o Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 2 x 120536 sec a distance = 1.1318 mkm
(Jupiter Motion Distance During A Solar Day)
- Planets data shows that, some geometrical mechanism be found behind their
creation. We should try to answer the question (Why a geometrical mechanism or
system be found behind Planets Data Creation?)
- The example provides us the question and we should discuss it in the paper.
- This short summary about the planets data analysis method shows its positive
effect on planets motions understanding.

I do this research
2nd
8
3- The Machine Motor Description
3-1 Preface
3-2 The Machine Motor Description
3-1 Preface
- What important discovery this paper provides?
- I have discovered The Machine Real Motor.
- Let's try to explain that in following:
o Newton Description tells (The Sun Mass Gravity Causes The Solar Planet
Motion)
o By that, The Sun is The Planet Motion Reason
o While this idea be acceptable generally. The next question be (By What
Mechanism The Sun Gravity Causes The Planet Motion?) This question
supposes that The Sun Mass Gravity Concept Is A Correct One.
o The whole concept depends on the outer observation, because Planets
Motions data isn't used in this concept creation.
BUT
o The fact is that,
o The Solar Planet Motion Depends On Its Neighbor Planet Motion And
Not On The Sun.
o Means, The Machine Uses A Different Motor
o As A Result
o The geometrical features of the real motor are different from Newton
Theory Motor, and that creates a gab between the 2 visions.
o The real motor basic feature is The Planet Motion Dependency On Its
Neighbor Planet Motion while Newton Theory Motor basic feature is The
Planet Motion Dependency On The Sun.

I do this research
2nd
9
3-2 The Machine Motor Description
- What's The Machine Real Motor? It's (The Equal Distances)
- Let's explain it in following:
o The planets move equal distances in defined periods of time. For example,
Earth moves during its day period a distance = Pluto motion distance during
its day period (error 1%).
o The 2 Distances Are Equal And Be Passed In Defined Periods Of Time.
o This is the basic requirement of the machine real motor. The machine works
depending on this requirement.
o That means, to cause the machine to work. It's necessary to cause 2 planets
to move equal distances in defined periods of time.
o Defined periods of time means a period is defined by a cycle, as planet day
period or rotation period or orbital period, also any planet can use any other
planet defined periods of time for its motion.
BUT
o What Proves, This Is The Real Motor?
o This is the real motor because this method is used thousands of times in the
solar system motion. it's a very famous method and be used by all planets in
their motions. because of that 50% of all distances in the solar system equal
one another (please see appendix no. 1). And the rest part of the distances in
the solar system are defined also depending on the distances equality.
How does the real motor work?

I do this research
2nd
10
How Does The Real Motor Work?
- Why the equal distances cause a planet motion? I don't know yet, even I don't
know what planet be moving as a result of the distances equality. But let's try to
discover the motor basic features of motion in following:
- The motor works by a geometrical rule, as a waterwheel, it rotates by the water
motion depends on a geometrical rule. Also it's similar to a lever which can be
created by a long piece of wood and one rock, these simple tools can cause to raise
a heavy weight by small one.
- means, The Motor Depends On A Geometrical Rule
- based on that, we have 2 points to discuss (1st
) the tool itself (2nd
) the geometrical
rule by which the tool works.
- (1st
Point) (The Tool)
- Equal Distances Be Passed By 2 Planets Motions In Defined Periods Of Time
- This geometrical feature importance is its repeated using, where this feature is
used in the solar system motion thousands of times
- (2nd
Point) (The Geometrical Rule)
- What's the geometrical effect of these distances equality? Let's see that in Earth
and Pluto motions data.
DATA
(A)
- Earth moves during its day period a distance = Pluto motion distance during its day
period = the moon displacements total during its day period (error 1%).
(B)
- (Earth velocity / Pluto velocity) = (Pluto Day period/ Earth day period) = 6.37 (0.8%)
- Pluto orbital distance 5906 mkm = Earth orbital circumference 940 mkm x 2π

I do this research
2nd
11
- Pluto orbital period 90560 days = Earth Cycle (1461 days) x 2π3
(C)
- (Pluto motion distance daily406000 km/ the moon displacement daily88000 km)=4.61
- (The Moon Day Period 708.7 h / Pluto Day Period 153.3 h) = 4.61
- Tan (12.2) x 708.7 h (The Moon Day Period) = 153.3 hours (Pluto Day Period)
- Tan (13.17) x 655.7 h (The Moon rotation Period) = 153.3 hours (Pluto Day Period)
- (Where 13.17 deg = the moon daily motion degrees, and 12.2 deg =13.17 deg – 0.9856
deg Earth motion daily degrees)
Discussion
(I)
- The equal distances create a clear proportionality for the 2 planets motions data. So
let's summarize my discovery in short words…
- I have found the equal distances method be used thousands of times in the solar
system motion and each time this method be used the 2 planets motions data be in
proportionality with one another clearly.
- Because of this data I have supposed this is The Real Motor
(II)
- The data analysis shows, the equal distances work basically between 2 neighbors
planets. For example, Jupiter motion creates equal distance with Saturn motion.
and then Saturn motion creates equal distance with Neptune motion! (why not
Uranus?!). the data shows the equal distances be used between neighbors planets
and because of that, Saturn has to create its equal distance with Uranus but because
Uranus has an interaction with Pluto, that forces Saturn to create its equal distance
with Neptune. This idea is proved clearly in (Planet 8 days cycle) which we should
discuss in this paper.

I do this research
2nd
12
(III)
- The data analysis shows that, the equal distances be used among the outer planets
more than the inner planets. And in the outer planets the equal distances method be
more regular and understandable.
- By this data, I conclude that, the inner planets motions depend on their data but the
outer planets motions depend on the inner planets motions and the equal distances
method is used for the motion transportation from the inner planets to the outer
planets. By that I had to find a reason for the inner planets motions and because
Earth mass be = the rest inner planets masses total, this data helped me to conclude
that (some electric field must be found between the inner planets and cause their
motions) (as we should discuss in the next point no.4)
(IV)
- The equal distances method is a very famous because by it the inner planets
motions be transported to the outer planets and the motion be transported among
the outer planets. For that reason the equal distances method is used widely in the
solar system motion.
(V)
- Because the distances are equal, that creates a general proportionality with data.
for example, Jupiter motion distance during (8 Jupiter days) = Saturn motion
distance during (10 Saturn days) = Neptune motion distance during (12 Neptune
days), because of the equality, The data can show that, Jupiter distance = Neptune
distance. In fact the method depends on the neighbor planets, so the far planets
also show equal distances based on this vision. And by that we find Earth motion
distance = Pluto motion distance.
(VI)
- The equal distances causes many geometrical features on the planets motions as a
result. means, the previous short description gives a notice only about this method
which is the main motor for the solar system motion, For example

I do this research
2nd
13
- The equal distances method causes to create different rates of time for the planets
motions. as a result, 1 hour of Earth motion be = 6.37 hours of Pluto motion. this
feature we should discuss and prove clearly in this paper.
(VII)
- The equal distances method creates different effects on the planets motions, these
effects show that the real motor is different from Newton Theory Motor. This
hypothesis is proved by the following proves:
o Planet Motion Depends On Its neighbor Planet Motion And Not On The Sun
(As A Result Planet orbital distance be defined depending on its neighbor
planet orbital distance) (Point No.5)
o The Distances Equality Wide Using In The Solar System refers to an
essential continuous using for it in the solar system motion. (Point No.6)
o The solar planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion. this
unified motion be similar to the train carriages motion. and the unified
general motion proves that Planet motion depends on Its neighbor planet
motion. (Point No.7)
o The Outer Planets Motions are distinguish from the inner planets motions in
their geometrical features. Which proves that both types of motions can't be
created by the same one force. (Point No.8)
o The Planets Motion Dependency shows a clear trajectory of energy passes
through the solar system. This energy trajectory starts from the inner planets
to Jupiter to Uranus to Pluto and then to Neptune and again to the inner
planets. The energy trajectory proves that planet motion depends on Its
neighbor planet motion and not on the sun. (Point No.9)

I do this research
2nd
14
4- The Inner Planets Motions
4-1 Preface
4-2 The Inner Planets Motions
4-1 Preface
- This point of discussion tries to prove that
- Planet Independent Motion Concept Is Incorrect.
- The inner planets motions depend on electric field, which depends on supposed
charges attributed to the inner planets as we should explain in the next point.
- The outer planets motions depend on the inner planets motions transportation, by
that no planet motion be considered independent from the other planets motions.
- The point is, Planet Independent Motion Concept is An Imaginary Concept.
- We need to ask why many concepts be considered as imaginary ideas? The secret
behind that is the big bang theory. The big bang theory was not a just theory in the
physics book. It created The Classical Solar Planets Motions Whole Description.
because of that many imaginary ideas still live in our physic book. Let's try to
explain that in following.
- The classical description tells the solar planets are rigid bodies independent from
each other in their creation and motion. (why?) because the description supposes
the planets be created by collisions among one another and by that planets data be
created as Random Data Without Geometrical Reasons (!!). let's analyze this
part of the classical description.
- Let's suppose the planets be created by collisions among one another. why the
planets data should be random data created without geometrical reasons
behind? Because
- The Planet Motion Effect On This Planet Data (here one negative point against
the classical description, because the description supposes the planets data be
inherited from historical factors and no change can be occurred for this data.). that

I do this research
2nd
15
shows the big bang theory effect. The description supposes the planets data be
inherited from historical factors and this data be fixed and can't be changed at any
case because of these historical factors! Here the description disregards the Planet
motion and considers it has no (any) effect on the planet motion data.
- To see this point clearly, let's try to answer the following question (if the planet
velocity changes what other data will be changed as a result?) Nothing
- Why?
- Because the planets data be inherited from historical factors and events and the
planets has to save this data without change whatsoever the planet motion be!
- Let's use an example for better explanation
An Example
- The solar planets order contradicts the gravitation equation strongly, when we
asked why? the answer was because of (The Initial Conditions)!!
- Jupiter occupies the order no (5) in the solar system, and the 3 planets (Earth –
Venus – Mercury) shows that greater mass needs longer orbital distance and not
shorter. And even Uranus (less mass) be more near to the sun than Neptune
(greater) mass. these are clear contradictions with the gravitation equation. Why
the equation be acceptable spite?! Because of (The Initial Conditions)!!
- And what are these (The Initial Conditions)?!
- The planets positions be inherited through the history. These positions restricted
the planets and prevented them to correct their positions to follow the gravitation
equation. On the other side the planets revolve around the sun but their revolutions
and motions have no any effect on the planets motions data or positions, But the
unknown historical factors have the massive effects and by magic prevent the
planets to follow the gravitation equation and correct their positions. (for myself I
prefer to think that, the equation may be mistaken!)
- This explanation shows the importance of using planets data in comparison with
any theory tries to explain the planets motions.

I do this research
2nd
16
4-2 The Inner Planets Motions
I- Data
(1)
Earth Mass = The Masses total of (Mercury + Venus + Mars)
(2)
Earth Circumference = The 5 inner planets diameters total
(Means the diameters total of (Mercury + Venus + The Moon + Earth + Mars))
(3)
2 x Earth Circumferences = 2 Mars Circumferences + Venus Circumference
(4)
Earth Circumference = The moon freedom space of motion
II- Discussion
- The double production experiment tells us
- From Gamma ray one electron and one positron can be created, 2 particles equal in
mass and opposite in charge.
- Equation no. (1) tells, Earth Mass = The 3 Inner Planets Masses Total (error 1%)
- Can we imagine that, a great gamma ray be used to create the inner planets.
- Earth is (The Great Electron) (means, Earth atom has a positive nucleus and
negative charges revolve around)
- The 3 Inner Planets Consist Together (The Great Positron) (means, the inner
planets " Mercury – Venus – Mars ", Their atoms have negative nucleus and
positive charges move around)
- If these hypotheses be working, the inner planets can create One Electric Field to
cause their motions around the sun.
- The error (1%) refers to a part of mass be consumed to create the required energy
for these planets motions through their orbits.
- By that the error (1%) is found for a physical necessity and not be found as an
error in measurements.

I do this research
2nd
17
- The previous description provides a suitable base to create an eclectic field
- The electric field is better for the planets motions than the sun gravity force.
- Newton has no one proof for the sun mass gravity force but the electric field
theory depends on the masses equality fact.
- The next discussion can support the electric field theory.
Equation no. (2)
Earth Circumference = The 5 inner planets diameters total
(Means the diameters total of (Mercury + Venus + The Moon + Earth + Mars))
Equation no. (3)
2 x Earth Circumferences = 2 Mars Circumferences + Venus Circumference
- For what we search? For Electric Charges
- If we can prove that, some electric charge be found in the inner planets. That can
support this idea greatly
- Why these 2 equations refer to charges in the inner planets data?
- Because of Gauss Law!
- Gauss law tells, The Charges Be On The Outer Surface, that means, the outer
surface can be effected Geometrically by electric charges. Because more wide
outer surface receives more charges. That tells The Charge Electric Field Effect on
the matter dimensions must be A Geometrical Effect
- I want to say
- If some planet be charged its outer surface formation and dimensions should be
effected Geometrically because of the electric charge.
- Means, the geometrical effects should be used as a proof for charges existence.
- The previous 2 equations no. (2 and 3) can support this idea because the inner
planets circumferences and diameters be created in proportionality which can refer
to geometrical effects be produced by electric charges on their creation.

I do this research
2nd
18
Equation no. (4)
Earth Circumference = The moon freedom space of motion
- The moon orbital period radius =363000 km
- The moon orbital apogee radius =406000 km
- The difference 43000 km
- But the space without the moon diameter =43000 km- 3475 km = 39500km= Earth
Circumference (error 1.3%)
- This data is used for the same argument, A geometrical effect be found on the
surface distances which can be used as a reference for an electric field effects on
the matter dimensions
- Notice
- We know the distance can't be charged unless under specific conditions, but I try
to show geometrical effects are found. It's not necessary for this effect to be a
direct one, but it can be found through interactions.
- Notice
- 43000 km (the distance from perigee to apogee) x 3475 km (the moon diameter)
=149.6 mkm (Earth Orbital Distance). I try to show that, geometrical features are
found behind the dimensions and distances definition in the inner planets. And
these geometrical features supports the electric field effect claim.
- Notice
- We have discovered that the planets motions can't be independent from the other
planets motions on the contrary the planets motions be similar to chess board
motions where each motion be calculated geometrically. This features (Chess
Board Motion) we should discuss in point no. (8) of this paper in which we discuss
the planets unified general motion. but I want to say that, the electric field is the
best method can provide this type of motion (Chess Board Motion)
- That supports the claim, (The Inner Planets Motions Depend On Electric Field)

I do this research
2nd
19
A Conclusion
- The electric field idea aims to create a source of motion for the inner planets. By
that the moving planets are the inner planets. That tells the inner planets motions
depend on the inner planets electric field. But the outer planets motions depend on
the motion transportation from the inner planets motions to the outer planets
motions.
- By that we have 2 different types of motions but both originated from the same
one source by 2 different methods and that enable the planets motions to be
integrated in one unified general motion as we will discuss in point no (8) of this
paper.

I do this research
2nd
20
The Paper Hypothesis Proves
- Proof No. (1) Planet Motion Depends On Its neighbor Planet Motion And Not On
The Sun (As A Result Planet orbital distance be defined depending on its neighbor
planet orbital distance) (Point No.5)
- Proof No. (2) The Distances Equality Wide Using In The Solar System refers to an
essential continuous using for it in the solar system motion. (Point No.6)
- Proof No. (3) The solar planets motions be integrated into one unified general
motion. this unified motion be similar to the train carriages motion. and the unified
general motion proves that Planet motion depends on Its neighbor planet motion.
(Point No.7)
- Proof No. (4) The Outer Planets Motions are distinguish from the inner planets
motions in their geometrical features. Which proves that both types of motions
can't be created by the same one force. (Point No.8)
- Proof No. (5) The Planets Motion Dependency shows a clear trajectory of energy
passes through the solar system. This energy trajectory starts from the inner
planets to Jupiter to Uranus to Pluto and then to Neptune and again to the inner
planets. The energy trajectory proves that planet motion depends on Its neighbor
planet motion and not on the sun. (Point No.9)

I do this research
2nd
21
5- Proof No. 1 (Planet Motion Depends On Its Neighbor)
5-1 Preface
5-2 Planet Orbital Distance Equation
5-3 Jupiter Orbital Circumference Analysis
5-1 Preface
- How does this proof work? let's discuss in following
- Let's suppose planet motion depends on its neighbor planet motion, what would
happen? We should discover this dependency in planets motions data.
- This proof analyzes planets motions data to show that, this data is created because
planet motion depends on it neighbor planet motion.
- For example, planet orbital distance equation shows that, planet orbital distance is
defined based on its neighbor planet orbital distance, Why?
- The proof provides 3 basic data which are
(1)
- Planet orbital distance is defined based on its neighbor planet orbital distance
(2)
- Jupiter orbital circumference be = the inner planets orbital circumferences total
and this data refers to that Jupiter motion depends on the inner planets motions
(3)
- The outer planet orbital circumference almost equal = all previous planets orbital
circumferences total.
- We should discuss this data deeply to prove these ideas. But if the ideas be proved
that supports the hypothesis (Planet motion depends on its neighbor planet motion)

I do this research
2nd
22
5-2 Planet Orbital Distance Equation
(I)
We study this equation here to prove that (Planet motion depends on its neighbor
planet motion).
(II)
Gerges Equation For Planet Orbital Distance
d2
= 4do (d – do)
Where
d= A Planet Orbital Distance
do= The Previous Planet Orbital Distance
Earth depends on Mercury
Mars depends on Venus
Pluto depends on Uranus
Discussion
Why Does A Planet Orbital Distance Depend On Its Neighbor Planet?
- That's one result of the solar planets motions real force. no planet depends on the
sun in orbital distance definition. Each planet depends on its neighbor. That shows
planets depend on their neighbor in their motions and not on the sun.
- We can see Newton description mistake clearly, the lines among the planets create
these planets data where the lines from these planets to the sun have no effect on
these planets data. The Solar Planets real motion is done by a transportation of
motion (or dependency of motion) from a point to its neighbor point, which creates
a network of motions. this network of motions be similar to a textile be (yarn). As
a woman weaves a piece of cloth. By a needle moves from a point to another and
then the cloth will be created. the network of motions proves that planet motion
can't depend on the sun but on its neighbor planet motion.

I do this research
2nd
23
The Equation Application
Gerges Equation For Planet Orbital Distance
d2
= 4do (d – do)
d= A Planet Orbital Distance
do= The Previous Planet Orbital Distance
- (227.9 mkm)2
= 4 (108.2 mkm) (119.7 mkm)
- Where
- 227.9 mkm = Mars Orbital Distance
- 108.2 mkm = Venus Orbital Distance
- 119.7 mkm = Venus Mars Distance
- (108.2 mkm)2
= 4 (57.9 mkm) (50.3 mkm)
- Where
- 57.9 mkm = Mercury Orbital Distance
- 50.3 mkm = Mercury Venus Distance
- (149.6 mkm)2
= 4 (57.9 mkm) (91.7 mkm) (error 2.5%)
- Where
- 149.6 mkm = Earth Orbital Distance
- 57.9 mkm = Mercury Orbital Distance
- 91.7 mkm = Mercury Earth Distance
- (Earth depends on Mercury in place of its direct neighbor Venus)
- (227.9 mkm)2
= 4 (108.2 mkm) (119.7 mkm)
- Where
- 119.7 mkm = Venus Mars Distance
- (Mars depends on Venus in place of its direct neighbor The Earth )

I do this research
2nd
24
- (415 mkm)2
= 4 (227.9 mkm) (187.1 mkm)
- Where
- 415 mkm = Ceres Orbital Distance
- 187.1 mkm = Mars Ceres Distance
- (778.6 mkm)2
= 4 (415 mkm) (363.6 mkm)
- Where
- 778.6 mkm = Jupiter Orbital Distance
- 415 mkm = Ceres Orbital Distance
- 363.6 mkm = Ceres Jupiter Distance
- (1433.5 mkm)2
= 4 (778.6 mkm) (655 mkm)
- Where
- 1433.5 mkm = Saturn Orbital Distance
- 778.6 mkm = Jupiter Orbital Distance
- 655 mkm = Saturn Jupiter Distance
- (2872.5 mkm)2
= 4 (1433.5 mkm) (1439 mkm)
- Where
- 2872.5 mkm = Uranus Orbital Distance
- 1433.5 mkm = Saturn Orbital Distance
- 1439 mkm = Saturn Uranus Distance
- (4495.1 mkm)2
= 4 (2872.5 mkm) (1622.6 mkm) (error 4%)
- Where
- 4495.1 mkm = Neptune Orbital Distance
- 1622.6 mkm = Uranus Neptune Distance

I do this research
2nd
25
- (5906 mkm)2
= 4 (2872.5 mkm) (3033.5 mkm)
- Where
- 5906 mkm = Pluto Orbital Distance
- 3033.5 mkm = Uranus Pluto Distance
(Pluto depends on Uranus in place of its direct neighbor Neptune)
Notice
- 3 Planets Violate The Equation, (Why?)
- For example
- Pluto depends on Uranus and not on Neptune why?
- I can't answer here, we should keep in mind this question, and see how Uranus
depends on Pluto day period in (Plant 8 days cycle). Simply, Uranus uses Pluto
data always and frequently. There's a deep reason for this relationship, I can't
explain it in a short sentence. The fact is that, Uranus caused Pluto day period to be
so long (153.3 h) and uses Pluto day period in Uranus motion through (Planet 8
days cycle), also Pluto depends on Uranus in many other features of motion and
this equation shows one side only
- We still have the positive result from the equation, because it tells the lines among
planets are so important than the lines between the planets and the sun. because
based on these lines, the planets data be created. Shortly, the planets motions
depend on their neighbor planets motions and not on the sun mass gravity. And
because the neighbor planets data be registered because of their effect. If the sun
gravity has any effect it would be registered in the planets data also, Which shows
NO Effect of The sun gravity be found on the planets motions.
- If the effects aren't seen on the data, so the other planets effects shouldn't be seen
also which is wrong because the planets effects are seen in the effected planets
data. But no data shows the sun effect, means, no gravity is provided from the sun

I do this research
2nd
26
5-3 Jupiter Orbital Circumference Analysis
(A)
- Jupiter orbital circumference = The inner planets orbital circumferences total
- In numbers,
4900 mkm = 360 mkm + 680 mkm + 940 mkm + 1433 mkm +1433 mkm (1%)
- Where
- 4900 mkm = Jupiter Orbital Circumference
- 360 mkm = Mercury Orbital Circumference
- 680 mkm = Venus Orbital Circumference
- 940 mkm = Earth Orbital Circumference
- 1433 mkm = Mars Orbital Circumference
- If we accept that, The Earth moon orbital circumference around the sun = 1433
mkm = Mars orbital circumference (Later We Should Discuss Why?)
- If we accept that, So
Jupiter Orbital Circumference be = The Inner Planets Orbital Circumferences
Total, Why?
(B)
- Mercury moves during its day period a distance = 720.7 mkm = Mercury Jupiter
distance
- Venus orbital circumference =680 mkm = Venus Jupiter distance 671 mkm (1.2%)
- Earth orbital circumference =940 mkm =Earth Jupiter distance 928 mkm (1.2%)
(Earth and Jupiter should be on 2 different sides of the sun to create 928 mkm)
- The 3 Inner Planets Define Their Orbital Circumferences To Be = Their
Distances To Jupiter.

I do this research
2nd
27
(C)
(1)
778.6 mkm = 1.0725 x 720.7 mkm (Mercury Jupiter Distance)
(2)
720.7 mkm = 1.0725 x 671 mkm (Venus Jupiter Distance)
(3)
671 mkm = 1.0725 x 629 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance)
(D)
(4)
778.6 mkm (Jupiter orbital distance) = 1.16 x 671 mkm
(5)
720.7 mkm = 1.16 x 629 mkm (error 1%)
(6)
671 mkm = 1.16 x 580 mkm
- The data shows, the distances between Jupiter and the inner planets are defined
based on Geometrical Calculations, because of that all distances are rated with
(1.0725) and (1.16).
- Means, these planets motions are not independent motions, on the contrary they
are (complementary motions) and be created based on One Geometrical Design.
By That each planet motion data is defined in proportionality with other Planets
motions data.
- Please Notice
- We deal with the same players, Jupiter on one side and the 3 inner planets on the
other side. Their data be used frequently in different rates and forms. If there's no
geometrical reason be found behind this data, We would have to suppose tenths of
data of the same players are found by (Pure Coincidences), which is a claim has no
a piece of logic.
- The fact is clear. Some geometrical mechanism or (complementarity of motions)
be found among these planets and as a result this geometrical mechanism be seen
in their different motions data.

I do this research
2nd
28
II-Discussion
- If The Space = Energy (i.e. The Distance = Energy)
- we conclude that,
- The Energy Be Transported From The Inner Planets To Jupiter,
- The Rule (Distance = Energy) we should remember because it's used frequently in
Jupiter Motion Data.
- Notice
- The data considerers the moon orbital circumference =1433 mkm = Mars orbital
circumference (please remember, 4900 = 360+680+940+1433+1433), because
- Jupiter connects with the inner planets through 2 basic points (Mercury the first
inner planet) and Mars (the last inner plant). Jupiter connection with the inner
planets aims to support the Earth moon motion and creates its motion orbit.
Because of that, Jupiter tries to make the moon belong to one of these 2 points, but
Mercury is so far from the moon, because of that, Jupiter considers the moon
belongs to Mars.
- The 3 planets (Mercury, Mars and Jupiter) Motions Complementarity can be more
clear by study the planets unified general motion we should do in point no. (8) of
this paper.
- The data tries to prove that, Jupiter motion depends on the inner planets motions
which supports the hypothesis (planet motion depend on its neighbor planet
motion)
- This point be discussed in more details in point no. (9) (the solar system energy
trajectory).
- Notice
- Please review appendix no. (3) it supports Jupiter orbital circumference discussion,
and shows that, the outer planet orbital circumference depends on its previous
planets orbital circumferences total.

I do this research
2nd
29
6-Proof No. 2 (The Distances Equality Wide Using In The Solar System)
6-1 Preface
6-2 The Equal distances in the solar system
6-1 Preface
- The machine real motor is the equal distances
- in point no. 3 we have discussed the equal distances meaning and effect in the
solar system motion.
- nothing can be added about this subject to what's written in point no. (3) it explains
the idea as clear as possible
- Please review the point (3-2 The Machine Motor Description)
- BUT
- In this current point I have to refer to the equal distances using in the solar system.
The using shows clearly the massive effect of this feature in the solar system
motion. in the next point I should refer to the basic data shows the equal distances
using in the solar system

I do this research
2nd
30
6-2 The Equal Distances In The Solar System
DATA
(1)
In appendix no. (1) of this paper I have inserted a list for the equal distances in the
solar system. Where 50% of the solar system all distances are equal one another
Also
There's another list for the using of the rate (1.0725)
Where 40% of the solar system all distances be rated with the same one rate (1.0725)
The explanation of the rate (1.0725) supposes that these (40%) of distances also were
equal one another by one effect be occurred for have of them and by that the rate
(1.0725) be found as a rate between all these distances
(2)
Planet 8 days Cycle depends on the rule
(Planets move equal distances in defined periods of time)
Planet 8 days Cycle we should discuss in point no. (8) of this paper (the planets
unified general motion) (in this cycle we find tenths of equal distances one another)
Also
Planet 6 days Cycle depends on the rule
(Planets move equal distances in defined periods of time)
Planet 6 days Cycle we should discuss in point no. (8) of this paper (the planets
unified general motion) (in this cycle we find tenths of equal distances one another)
(3)
The equal distances using in the solar system is so wide more the previous data.
because we can discover this method using as a basic tool of the planet motion. but
we need to discover the meaning of this equality for that we use her one more in
following:
Mercury moves during its day period a distance = 243 mkm (error 1%)
Mars moves during Venus day period a distance = 243 mkm.

I do this research
2nd
31
Discussion
How to understand this data?
Mercury moves during its day period a distance = 243 mkm (error 1%)
Mars moves during Venus day period a distance = 243 mkm.
We should know also that,
(Mercury day period / Venus day period) = (Mercury orbital period / Mercury rotation
period). The data shows that, Venus day period is created with Mercury Data. the
equal distances of Mars and Mercury gives more great effect on 3 planets data.
But let's ask
- Why this data isn't created by pure coincidence of numbers? Why a geometrical
mechanism and reason must be found behind? Because
- If the planets move independent motions, each planet will interest for its period.
By that, Mars moves during its orbital period (687 days) the distance = its orbital
circumference 1433 mkm.
- And
- During other planets periods Mars should move random distances. (i.e. a distance
isn't one of the solar system distances and not be passed by other planets in define
periods of time)
- But
- Mars moves during (Venus Day period 116.75 days) a distance = Mercury motion
distance during Mercury rotation period.
- It's another example for the equal distances. And
- This data shows, Planets Motions Are Not Independent But Complementary
Motions.
- It's motion similar to the chess board motion. where each motion is calculated
geometrically.

I do this research
2nd
32
- This idea will be more clear in our discussion for the planets unified general
motion.
- The planets unified motion analysis shows that, the planets motions be done as
(chess board motions), each motion be calculated geometrically and done based
on other planets motions and in comparison with them.
- This result is produced by The Equal Distances Method
- As in Chess motion. the board is divided into columns vertical and horizontal
because of that each piece moves a defined motion obligatory by the system.
- That's perfectly what's one by the equal distances. The solar system became a
network of motions and each planet motion be calculated geometrically and
dependent in other planets motions. which disproves Newton theory of the sun
mass gravity.
- This is a basic difference with the classical description which considers the planets
motions be done independently, and each planet moves as if no other planet moves
beside. It's wrong in principle. The motions be complementary and dependent on
one another and because of that, the equal distances has this massive effect on the
planet motion.
- One more advantage of this description is that, any planet motion effects on all
other planets motions (regardless the distance) because all motions be controlled
by one force which is The Planets Unified General Motion.
Notice
- Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = Neptune motion distance during
the solar day (this is one more example for the equal distances)

I do this research
2nd
33
Discussion (continued)
- The basic objective behind this point no. (6) (the equal distances) is that, to show
the wide using of the equal distances method in the solar system motion.
- So, all data tried to do this task,
- And the data shows clearly that, the equal distances is a feature controls the planets
motions data.
- The question should be (Why The Distances Are Equal?)
- This question should be in our minds and kept by heart. Because
-
- I built my theory based on my a hypothesis tells that Newton Theory o the sun
gravity is a wrong one.
- Now
- Suppose the respectful reader refuses my hypothesis, and accepts Newton theory
as fact. What useful result the respectful reader can get from this paper?
- THE EQUAL DISTANCES
- Suppose Newton Theory is a correct one, we need it to answer the question (why
the distances are equal?)
- No pure coincidences claim can be used here because all distances almost equal
one another. the distances equality be created based on a geometrical reason and
my theory provides an explanation for this geometrical reason and now we need
Newton theory to explain this feature.
Notice
- Many important points will be more clear with the discussion of (The planets
unified general motion) in point no. (7) that because huge amount of data be
provided in this discussion.

I do this research
2nd
34
7- Proof No. 2 (The Planets Motions Create One Unified General Motion)
7-1 The Unified Motion Proof Idea
7-2 The planets motions is a complementary motion
7-3 The planets motions is a team motion (or unified motion)
7-1 The Unified Motion Proves Idea
- Let's summarize this idea in following
- A hypothesis tells (The Solar Planets Motions Create One Unified General
Motion) let's try to explain it in following…
- The hypothesis tells the planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- The hypothesis discovers One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary
with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result,
The Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
- Based on that, The Solar Planet Can't Change Its Motion.
- The Solar Planet creates its data to be in consistency with its motion.
- Because, the planet can't change its motion, but can change its data to be in
consistency with its motion. and because of that, the planet data be created in
consistency with its motion.
- Because the planet motion be complementary with other planets motions.
- The planet data be created complementary with other planets data
- Based On This Vision
- The solar planets data be created based on One Geometrical Design.
- And

I do this research
2nd
35
- The Planets Creation And Motions Data Be Controlled By One Equation Only
- The hypothesis gives a different vision from the solar planets classical description.
because its tells that, (The Solar Planet Data Be Created Based On Geometrical
Calculations And Rules). The classical description tells planets data be created by
random process and without geometrical reasons behind.
THE PROVES
- The planets unified general motions depends on 3 proves which are
- (1) The Solar Planets Motions Are Complementary Motions
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions is a team motion (or unified Motion)
- (3) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- These proves depend on huge number of data, because of that, the proves no. 1 and
2 be discussed in this point but the proof of no. (3) be discussed in the next point
no. (8).
- So, we should consider the points no. (7) and (8) together consist one proof
- The Planets Unified General Motion Proves That, (PLANET MOTION
DEPENDS ON ITS NEIGHBOR PLANET MOTION AND NOT ON THE
SUN)

I do this research
2nd
36
7-2 The Planets Motions Is A Complementary Motion
(The Interaction between Mercury, Mars and Jupiter)
(Sub-Point No. 1) (Mercury and Mars Motions)
- Mercury moves during its day period (4222.6 h.) a distance = 720.7 mkm
- Mars moves during (2802 hours) a distance = 243 mkm
- Mercury moves during (1407.6 hours) a distance = 243 mkm (error 1%)
- Mars moves during 346.6 d. a distance =720.7 mkm (Mercury Jupiter Dis.)
- Mercury moves during 346.6 d. a distance =1419 mkm (with 1433 error 1%)
- Mars moves during 687 d. a distance = 1433 mkm (Mars orbit. Circum)
- Mercury moves during 687 d. a distance =2815mkm (Mercury Uranus Dis.)
- Mars moves during 4331d. a distance = 9010mkm (Saturn orbit. Circum)
- Mercury moves during 4331d. a distance = 2815 mkm x 2π
- Mars moves during 224.7 d. a distance = π x 149.6 mkm (Earth orb. Dis)
- Mercury moves during 224.7 d. a distance = 920 mkm (with 928 error 1%)
- Mars moves during 365.25 d. a distance = π x 243 mkm (0.5%)
- Mercury moves during 365.25 d. a distance = 2 x 748 mkm
- Mars moves during 5040s. a distance= 121464 km= Saturn Diameter (+1%)
- Mercury moves during 5040s. a distance= 238896 km= 2 Saturn Diameters (-1%)
Where
1407.6 h = Mercury Rotation Period 2802 h = Venus Day Period
346.6 days = the nodal year 224.7 days = Venus orbital period
687 days = Mars Orbital Period
4331 days = Jupiter orbital period = 2π x 687 days

I do this research
2nd
37
(Sub-Point No. 2) (Mars And Jupiter Motions)
- Mars moves during 636.7 days a distance =1325 mkm= (Venus Saturn Dis.)
- Jupiter moves during 636.7 days a distance =720.7 mkm
- Mars moves during 687 d. a distance= 1433 mkm= Mars Orbital Circumference
- Jupiter moves during 687 d. a distance= 778.6 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Distance
- Mars moves during 4331d. a distance= 9010 mkm= Saturn orbital circumference
- Jupiter moves during 4331 d. a distance= 4900 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Circum.
- Mars moves during 778.6 d. a distance = 1622 mkm = Uranus Neptune Dis.
- Jupiter moves during 778.6 d a distance= 881 mkm =58 days x 15.19 mkm.
- ( 15.19 mkm = the 9 solar planets motions distances total per a solar day).

I do this research
2nd
38
(Sub-Point No. 3) (Mercury And Jupiter Motions)
- Mercury moves during 687 d. a distance= 2815 mkm= Mercury Uranus Distance
- Mercury moves during 1433 d. a distance =5848 mkm= Mercury Pluto Dis.
- Jupiter moves during 1433 d a distance =1622 mkm=Uranus Neptune Dis.
- Mercury moves during 4331d. a distance= 2815 mkm x 2π
- Mercury moves during 4222.6 h a distance = 720.7 mkm
- Jupiter moves during 4222.6 h a distance = 200 mkm = 629 mkm/π
- Mercury moves during 550.7 d a distance = π x 720.7 mkm (0.4%)
- Jupiter moves during 550.7 d a distance = 629 mkm (error 1%)
Please Remember,
Data Group No. (1)
- Mars moves during 687 d. a distance= 1433 mkm= Mars Orbital Circumference
- Mars moves during 4331d. a distance= 9010 mkm= Saturn orbital circumference
- Mars moves during 4331 x π d a distance= 28255 mkm= Neptune orbital circumference
Data Group No. (2)
- Mercury moves during 687 d. a distance= 2815 mkm= Mercury Uranus Distance
- Mercury moves during 4331d. a distance= 2815 mkm x 2π
Data Group No. (3)

I do this research
2nd
39
II-Discussion
- The planets move defined distances in defined periods of time.
- The Defined Distance means a distance is known in the solar system, as to be any
planet orbital distance or a distance between any 2 planets.
- The Defined Periods Of Time means a period of any planet cycle, as 365.25 days
(Earth orbital period) or any planet orbital period. Or any planet rotation period or
any planet day period. All these periods are defined periods of time
- The argument tells that
- If the solar planets move their motions independently from one another, based on
that, the planets motions during defined periods of time should pass (random)
distances. Because these Planets are independent in their motion from one
another. (For example) Mercury motion depends on its orbital period (88 days) and
doesn't interest for Mars orbital period (687 days) neither for Jupiter orbital period
(4331 days) and by that, Mercury during these periods (687 days and 4331 days)
should move some random distances (not defined in the solar system distances).
- The data disproves Planet Motion Independency Concept. because the (3)
planets move defined distances in defined periods of time. These planets motions
aren't independent from one another. These motions are done based on One
Geometrical Design. And these motions are similar to Chess Board Pieces
Motions. Each Motion is calculated geometrically and be obligatory.
Conclusion
- Jupiter Motion Depends On The Inner Planets Motions
- i.e.
- The Inner Planets Motions Energy Be Transported To Jupiter And Be Seen
In Jupiter Orbital Circumference.

I do this research
2nd
40
7-3 The Planets Motions Is A Team Motion (Planet 8 Days Cycle)
(This Cycle Shows Clearly That, The Planets Motions Are Motions Of A Team)
(I)
- Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during its day period (9.9 h) a distance = 466884 km
- But
- 466884 km = 449197 km (Jupiter Circumference) + 17687 km
- Where
- (8 x 17687 km = 141496 km (Jupiter Diameter) (error 1%)
- Based on that, we have concluded that, Jupiter has a cycle of 8 days
- Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 8 Jupiter days (79.2 h) a distance = 3735072 km
- (3735072 km= 8 Jupiter circumferences + 141496 km (Jupiter diameter) (1%)
(II)
- The distance 3735072 km be passed also by Saturn and Neptune with a rate 80%
depends on one another as following
- Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during 10 Saturn days (107 h) a distance = 3736440 km
- (10 Saturn Circumferences = 3786750 km, the difference =50310 km = Uranus
Diameter error 1.3%)
- Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 12 Neptune days (193.2 h) a distance = 3755808
km
- (24 Neptune Circumferences = 3734323 km, the difference =21485 km = Mars
Circumference (error 0.6 %))
(III)
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during Pluto day period (153.3 h) a distance = 3752784
km
- The distance 3752784 km = Jupiter motion distance during 8 days + 17687 km

I do this research
2nd
41
- And because
- 17687 km x (8) = 141496 km (Jupiter Diameter) (error 1%)
- That tells another Cycle is found between Uranus and Jupiter based on 8 Pluto
days
- That means, the distance be passed by Uranus during 8 Pluto days equal = the
distance be passed by Jupiter during 64 Jupiter days and equal = the distance be
passed by Saturn during 80 Saturn days and equal = the distance be passed by
Neptune during 100 Neptune days
Let's see that in following
(1)
Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during (64 Jupiter days) a distance =29880756 km
(2)
Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during (80 Saturn days) a distance =29891520 km
(3)
Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during (100 Neptune days) a distance =31298400 km
(4)
Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during (8 Pluto days) a distance =30022272 km
Comments
- We have 2 Basic Cycles which are
- Jupiter 8 Days Cycles, which creates a different distance = 141496 km (Jupiter
Diameter). And
- Uranus (8 Pluto days) Cycle, which creates a different distance = 141496 km
(Jupiter Diameter)
- That shows Jupiter is the master of Planet 8 days cycle. Because if Uranus effect =
Jupiter effect, that would cause the last difference to be = Uranus diameter. but it
doesn't happen. The difference is Jupiter diameter (always) which shows Jupiter
mastery.
- Why Jupiter is the master? Because it's the source of energy (later we discuss that)

I do this research
2nd
42
Discussion
(1)
- How can (Planet 8 days Cycle) disprove Planet Independent Motion?
- Because
- The Cycles Show That Different Planets Motions Be Used In The Same One
Cycle To Create One Final Motion.
- Means,
- Many planets move relative one another to create the different distance (141496
km Jupiter Diameter)
- So, because this different distance is created (always) by (many planets motion)
that disprove clearly Planet independent Motion Concept
(2)
- Why does (Planet 8 days Cycle) prove the planets complementary motions?
- Because
- The planets have to move complementary motions to create the different distance
(141496 km Jupiter Diameter). Uranus and Jupiter should move relative to one
another to cause this distance to be created.
- If Jupiter or Uranus motions be independent from the other the different distance
will not be created.
- Means,
- This machine creates this different distance (= Jupiter Diameter) frequently while
the cycle uses its different periods (means for the periods 8 days, 16 days, 24
days….etc).
- This result can be done only if the motions be complementary with one another.
(3)
- Why does (Planet 8 days Cycle) disprove Newton Description?

I do this research
2nd
43
- Because we see clearly Jupiter motion effect on Uranus motion and also on the
other outer planets motions. but the sun gravity shows no effect on these planets
motions data.
- We see the motion be transported from one planet to its neighbor, and this causes
the last planet to move while we see clearly the planet motion depends on its
neighbor motion. on the other side the sun gravity has no any effect on the planets
motions data. it's completely an imaginary idea, because the sun mass shows no
effect at all on any planet motion otherwise it can be discovered in the planets data
as we discovered Jupiter motion effect on the pother planets data.
- That shows the useful result of the approach, because
- We put planets motions data on one side and Newton Description on the other
side. The Data shows clearly and strongly that Newton is wrong. The machine
works completely different.

I do this research
2nd
44
8- The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
8-1 Preface
8-2 Earth And Pluto Rate Of Time
8-3 Mercury Motion Rate Of Time
8-4 Saturn Motion Rate Of Time
8-1 Preface
- The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
For example
- 1 hour of Mercury Motion =9.18 hours of Pluto Motion
- And
- 1 hour of Earth Motion = 29.53 hours of The Moon Motion
- We don't provide any theoretical explanation to explain why or how the solar
planets motions use different rates of time.
- Because
- I want to show that, The Solar Planets Motions Data Proves The Different
Rates Of Time Using
- I hope to prove this fact by very powerful and strong data and arguments. After we
should to know why or how the solar planets motions use different rate of time.
-
- There Are 2 Useful Results For This Approach
- (1st
Result).
- When the planets motions data prove the different rates of time using. In this case
my ideas will not be a point of discussion. Because I provide the data and if my
ideas be refused the data will be stayed in waiting for someone to explain how this
data be created.
- (2nd
Result).

I do this research
2nd
45
- The data saves us from the imagination. And by that we may move toward the
facts with more safe way.
- But
- The different rates of time is a meaning we have learnt from the Special Theory of
relativity and Lorentz Transformations.
- Each time we talk about it, the minds thinks in high velocity motion
- The question should be
- If the nature creates (by high velocity motion) different rates of time. Can the
nature use other method to create different rates of time with low velocities
motions?
- I suppose the nature provides examples of methods and not restricted one.
- Any way
- I don't explain how the planet motion use different rate of time. I try to show that,
The Planet Motion Data Proves This Fact Regardless Any Explanation.
Notice
- The Planets Unified General Motion Creates One Unified Rate Of Time.

I do this research
2nd
46
8-2 Earth And Pluto Rate Of Time
I- Data
Group no. (1) (Earth and Pluto Rate Of Time)
(A)
- Earth (29.8 km/s) moves during a solar day (24 h) a distance = 2574720 km
- Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during its day (153.3) a distance = 2593836 km
- The moon displacements total during (29.53 days) = 2598693 km
- Pluto and the moon motion distances be equal but they different from Earth motion
distance with (1%).
(B)
- (Earth velocity / Pluto velocity) = (Pluto Day period/ earth day period) = 6.37 (0.8%)
- Pluto orbital distance 5906 mkm = Earth orbital circumference 940 mkm x 2π
- Pluto orbital period 90560 days = Earth Cycle (1461 days) x 2π3
(C)
- 1 hour of Earth motion = 29.53 hours of the moon motion.
Group no. (2) (Pluto And The moon Rate Of Time)
(1)
(406000 km /88000 km) = (708.7 h/ 153.3 h) = 4.61
(2)
Tan (12.2) x 708.7 hours = 153.3 hours
(3)
Tan (13.17) x 655.7 hours = 153.3 hours
(4)
2 x 153.3 h = 4.61 x 66.8 But
(708.7 h /10.7 h) = (655.7 h /9.9 h) =66.23 (error 1%).
(5)
413600 km cos (10.96 deg) = 406000 km
(6)
(10.96 deg /1.7 deg) = (153.3 h /24 h) (error 1%)

I do this research
2nd
47
Data Analysis
(I)
- The data analysis shows that,
- The rate of time be defined based on the planets velocities rate
- For example
- Mercury velocity (47.4 km/s) = Venus velocity (35 km/s) x 1.35
- And
- Mercury velocity (47.4 km/s) = Earth velocity (29.8 km/s) x 1.6
- by that
- 1 hour of Mercury motion = 1.35 hours of Venus Motion
- And
- 1 hour of Mercury motion = 1.6 hours of Earth Motion
(II)
- If there's a difficulty to use the planets velocities, the next rule can be used instead.
- Equal Distance Creates Different Rates Of Time
- For example
- Earth moves during its day period (24 h) a distance = Pluto motion distance during
its day period (153.3 h) (error 1%)
- Because the distances are equal, the 2 periods create the rates of time, means
- 24 hours of Earth motion = 153.3 hours of Pluto motion.
(1 h of Earth motion = 6.37 hours of Pluto motion)
- Notice (1) (the error between distances should not be more than 1%)
- Notice (2) (when the velocities be difficult to be used?) As in the moon case. The
moon moves per a solar day a distance =2.574 mkm = Earth motion distance per a
solar day, otherwise they will be separated from each other. But the moon rate of
time is defined based the moon daily displacement (88000 km).

I do this research
2nd
48
II- Discussion
- The previous data is so interesting data.
- The proportionality of Earth and Pluto motions data always shows puzzle need
explanation.
- The Planets Unified General Motion creates the geometrical reason which can
explain the data. And now we know that, the same one law controls the 2 planets
motions and causes their data to be created in proportionality.
- I hour of Earth motion = 6.37 hours of Pluto motion
- This rate is concluded simply from Earth and Pluto velocities
Because
- Earth velocity (29.8 km/s) = Pluto velocity (4.7 km/s) x 6.37
- Also
- Pluto Day Period (153.3 h) = Earth Day Period (24 h) x 6.37
- The rate (6.37) which creates the rate of time between Pluto and Earth Motions,
effects greatly on the 2 planets motions data. As we have seen.
- Let's summarize the data idea in following:
o There's a proportionality between Pluto Data on one side and the other side
and its moon data on the other side. No Pure Coincidence can be claimed,
because the connection among the three planets be defined based on their
positions to one another. the question be (How This Data Be Created?)
o Even after we suppose (1 h o earth motion = 6.37 h of Pluto motion) this
idea can't explain simply how the data be created. the point is that, this rate
be used in the planets unified general motion, and through this general
motion the effect can be created. but the geometrical mechanism needs more
analysis to be caught.
o Let's discuss the data in following:

I do this research
2nd
49
Equation no. (C)
1 hour of Earth motion = 29.53 hours of the moon motion.
- Because
- The moon displacements total during the moon day period (29.53 days) = Earth
motion distance during a solar day Period. (error 1%)
- Because of that
- 1 Day Of Earth Motion =29.53 Days Of The Moon Motion.
- We can see that, the machine works with consistency, for example
o 1 hour of Earth motion =6.37 hours of Pluto motion
o 1 hour of Pluto motion = 4.61 hours of the moon motion
o And
o 1 hour of Earth motion = 6.37 x 4.61 = 29.53 hours of the moon motion
o The rates of time are created based on each planet motion data and be in full
harmony as we see. That tells we deal with a geometrical mechanism works
consistency…
- Let's see the rate of time of Pluto and the moon motions

I do this research
2nd
50
Group no. (2) (Pluto And The moon Rate Of Time)
Discussion
Equation no. (1)
(406000 km /88000 km) = (708.7 h/ 153.3 h) = 4.61
- Where
- 406000 km = Pluto motion distance per a solar day
- 88000 km = The moon displacement per a solar day
- 708.7 hours = The Moon Day Period
- 153.3 hours = Pluto Day Period
- Based on the rule (Equal distances creates different rates of time).
- 1 hour of Pluto motion = 4.61 hours of the moon motion.
- This rate of time be concluded because Pluto moves during its day period (153.3 h)
a distance = the moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days). By
that 708.7 hours of the moon motion = 153.3 hours of Pluto motion. And So, the
rate of time be concluded (1 h of Pluto motion =4.61 h of the moon motion)
- Again the rates of time causes (2 Planets All Data) to be in proportionality with
one another. in following equations we see that Pluto and the moon motions data
be in full proportionality which is very interesting data.
Equation no. (2)
Tan (12.2) x 708.7 hours = 153.3 hours
- Where
- The angle 12.2 degrees = 13.177 deg – 0.98562 deg
- 13.177 degrees = The Moon Motion Degrees Per A Solar Day
- 0.98562 degrees = The Earth Motion Degrees Per A Solar Day
- Equation no. (2) shows that the moon and Pluto days periods are created based on
each other geometrically. The fact can't be denied. Pluto day period (153.3 h) is
created as a function in the moon day period (708.7 h).

I do this research
2nd
51
Equation no. (3)
Tan (13.17) x 655.7 hours = 153.3 hours
- Where
- 13.177 degrees = The Moon Motion Degrees Per A Solar Day
- 655.7 hours = The Moon Rotation Period.
- 153.3 hours = Pluto Day Period and (153.3- ) = Pluto Rotation Period
- Equation no. (3) shows, Pluto rotation period is created depending on the moon
rotation period based on the angle (13.177 deg).
- The data of the 3 equations are strong and prove the idea clearly, because it's A
Directed Data. Means, this data be created based on geometrical mechanism be
found between Pluto and the moon motions. For that reason, the equations use (all)
data of the 2 planets. That shows the data is directed and can't be created by any
random process. It's data be created based on geometrical reasons and rules.
- The proportionality in data between Earth and its moon on one side and Pluto on
the other side shows that a geometrical mechanism must be found behind them.
Equation no. (4)
2 x 153.3 h = 4.61 x 66.8 But
(708.7 h /10.7 h) = (655.7 h /9.9 h) =66.23 (error 1%).
- 708.7 hours = The moon Day period
- 655.7 hours = The Moon Rotation Period
- 153.3 hours = Pluto Day Period
- 10.7 hours = Saturn Day Period
- 9.9 hours = Jupiter Day Period
- The rate (4.61) we have defined, where (1 hour of Pluto motion =4.6 hours of the
moon motion).
- Equation no.(4) tells that this rate (4.61) is known by Jupiter and Saturn motions.
- That tells, the rate (4.61) is transported among the solar planets and that explains
how this rate be created between the moon motion and Pluto motion.

I do this research
2nd
52
Equation no. (5)
413600 km cos (10.96 deg) = 406000 km
- Where
- 406000 km = Pluto Motion Distance During A Solar Day
- Equation no. (5) shows that, the motions interaction between the moon and Pluto is
a deep interaction. And effects on the planet motion basic data. Because
- The moon displacements total during 29.53 days =2598693 km = 2π x 413600 km
- The distance (413600 km) should be the moon apogee orbital radius if the moon
apogee orbital circumference = the moon displacements total during 29.53 days.
- This is the fact which should be performed
- But
- The moon apogee orbital circumference be (2550973 km) less than the moon
displacements total during (29.53 days) with 2%. This fact arises the question
Why? the moon apogee circumference should be 2598693 km (surely). But for
some geometrical miracle this distance became =2550973 km!
- The radius 413600 km be changed into 406000 km and this change be done based
on the equation no. (5). The angle (10.96) caused this change. We have discussed
this angle before deeply because it's the main angle in the moon orbit geometrical
structure (we will review a short notice about it later). The angle (10.96 deg)
causes the radius 413600 km to be 406000 km – why?
Equation no. (6)
(10.96 deg /1.7 deg) = (153.3 h /24 h) (error 1%)
- The angle 10.96 deg be created based on the rate between Pluto Day Period
(153.3h) and Earth Day Period (24 h). this rate be used between the angle (10.96)
which causes to decrease the radius from 413600 km to 406000 km, and the angle
1.7 deg which is the moon daily motion angle in the moon orbital equation (θ1= θ0
+ 1.7 deg). (The moon orbital equation be discussed in the moon orbital motion
description point no.8** of this paper)

I do this research
2nd
53
Notice (1)
- The moon displacements total 2598693 km should be the moon apogee orbital
circumference, by that, the moon apogee orbital radius should be =413600 km
- But
- It's not true, the moon apogee orbital radius =406000 km
- Why? because of the angle (10.96 degrees)
- Let's remember this angle in following:
o The moon orbital perigee radius =363000 km
o The moon orbital apogee radius = 406000 km
o If we draw these 2 radiuses in 2 circles as in the figure
o The tangent DB = 181843 km, also
o The perigee orbital circumference = 2.28 mkm
o (181843 km /2.28 mkm) = 0.08
o 137 degrees x 0.08 = (10.96 degrees)
o As we remember that 137 degrees = 95.1 deg x 1.44 deg where
o 95.1 deg =90 deg + 5.1 deg (the moon orbital inclination)
o 1.44 deg = the moon orbit regression degrees per month.
o We have supposed that the angle 137 degrees is created based on the moon
orbital inclination (degrees) and the moon orbit regression angle monthly.
And this angle (137 deg) is the basic angle in the moon orbital geometrical
structure (hypothesis).
o The calculations of the tangent DB = 181843 km aimed to explain one basic
idea which is, the moon orbit is built geometrically to create the rate (0.08)
by which the moon orbital inclination and regression will create the angle
(10.96 deg).
o Let's explain that more clearly

I do this research
2nd
54
o The moon orbit inclination and regression controls the moon orbital motion.
this is a hypothesis. Now, the moon orbital motion creates the moon orbit
based on a geometrical design, the moon orbital motion uses the moon orbit
geometrical design to create the angle (10.96 deg) from the basic one (137
deg). by that the original angle is (137 deg) which is created by the moon
inclination and regression unification, and the born angle is (10.96 deg)
which is the motor of the machine.
o What we need to refer to that, the moon orbit geometrical design is used in
this process. That's why the distance 413600 be decreased and became
406000 km. By that, the main player is the angle (10.96 deg).
- This explanation answers the question,
- Why Pluto Motion Distance During A Solar Day = The Moon Apogee Orbital
Radius=406000 km?

I do this research
2nd
55
Notice (2)
- The previous data still have another reading let's summarize it in following:
o Pluto day period is a very long day period in comparison with the outer
planets days periods, Why?
o We notice also that, Pluto Moves During Its Day Period A Distance =
Earth Motion Distance During Earth Day Period. That means, Pluto Day
Period be extending to perform this requirement.
o i.e.
o Pluto Day Period be extending to be 153.3 h to enable Pluto to move a
distance = Earth motion distance during Earth day period.
o Because of that,
o Pluto day period (and rotation period) be created as functions in the Earth
moon day and rotation periods as we have seen in the data discussion.
o i.e.
o The interaction between Pluto motion on one side with the Earth and its
moon motions on the other side caused the following results:
o (1st
Result) the moon apogee orbital radius be decreased from 413600 km to
be 406000 km
o (2nd
Result) Pluto Day Period be extending to be =153.3 days.
o These 2 Results Are Produced Depends On One Another.
Notice (3)
- Uranus effect is the main force behind these changes in both planets data because
Uranus effects on the moon and Pluto motions.

I do this research
2nd
56
8-3 Mercury Motion Rate Of Time
I- Data
(1)
112.2 km/s = 4.7km/s x 23.9
(2)
1407.6 hours =153.3 hours x 9.18
(3)
90560 days = 4222.6 hours x 9.18 x 2.33 (error 2%)
(4)
(2 x 153.3 h x 3600 s) /5040 s =23.9 x 9.18
II- Discussion
Equation (1)
112.2 km/s = 4.7 km/s x 23.9
- Where
- 112.2 km/s = The 3 Planets Velocities Total
- 4.7 km/s = Pluto Velocity
- Let's suppose, the 3 planets velocities (Mercury, Venus and Earth) be unified in
one velocity =112.2 km/s, So this velocity works as one gear and Pluto velocity
works as another gear, move relative to one another.
- By this supposed motion of 4 planets, the rate (1 hour = 23.9 hours) be created and
that causes 1 hours of a planet motion be = 23.9 hours of another planet motion.
- This process has a great effect on the solar planets rates of time because if the
planets motions rates of time depend only on the planets velocities that makes the
max rate is (10.08). Means, 1 hour of a planet motion be = 10.08 hours of another
planet motion. And this is a very narrow range of the rates of time. The 3 planets
velocities total creates an extension for this process and enables the system to
create the rate (1h = 23.9 h).

I do this research
2nd
57
Equation (2)
1407.6 hours =153.3 hours x 9.18
- Where
- 1407.6 hours = Mercury Rotation Period
- 153.3 days = Pluto Day Period.
- (9.18) = The rate of time between Mercury and Pluto motions.
- We conclude that mercury and Pluto motions rates of time is (9.18) based on this
equation. Means
- 1 hour of Mercury Motion = (9.18) hours of Pluto Motion.
- By this same method we conclude the rate of time between Pluto and the moon
motions. It was the rate between the moon day period and Pluto day period. But
here the rate (9.18) is between Mercury Rotation Period and Pluto Day Period
(where Pluto day period =153.3 h and Pluto rotation period = -153.3 h)
Equation (3)
90560 days = 4222.6 hours x 9.18 x 2.33 (error 2%)
- Where
- 90560 days = Pluto Orbital Period
- 4222.6 hours = Mercury day period
- 2.33 = ??
- Mercury velocity (47.4 km/s) = 10.08 x Pluto velocity (4.7km/s). if the planets
rates of time depend on their velocities. That means 1 hour of Mercury motion =
10.08 hours of Pluto motion. and in this case 24 hours of Pluto motion = 2.37
hours of Mercury Motion.
- That because the equation uses (Pluto orbital period 90560 solar days) in
comparison with 4222.6 hours (Mercury day period). The equation proves that the
rate (9.18) is the used one between the 2 planets.

I do this research
2nd
58
Equation (4)
(2 x 153.3 h x 3600 s) /5040 s =23.9 x 9.18
- Where
- 5040 seconds are required for Mercury day period to be 176 solar days
- 153.3 h = Pluto Day Period.
- 23.9 = the rate between the 3 planets velocities total (112.2 km/s) and Pluto
velocity (4.7 km/s).
- This equation also proves that the rat of time between Mercury and Pluto is (9.18)
- The data proves that, 1 hour or Mercury motion = (9.18) of Pluto motion.
Notice
- Different data of Mercury and Pluto Motions shows that the rate of time between
them is (9.18)
- Because this rate is used in different data in the 2 planets motions data, we
conclude that it's a fact and real one.
- I wish the proves show its power clearly. Because we deal with geometrical data.
We find for example a rate (9.18) between Mercury and Pluto motions data and
this rate be used between them frequently. That happens also with Earth (6.37) and
with the moon (4.61).
- The point is that, the rate of time has a massive effect on planets motion but we
still need to discover this effect clearly.
- It's noticeable to take into consideration the method by which the rate of time
effect on Planet Motion.
Notice
- If Mercury and Pluto motions rate of time be defined based on their velocities
only, The rate will be 10.08 (means 1 h of Mercury motion = 10.08 h of Pluto
motion). the rate (9.18) effect only on Pluto and Mercury motions but no other
planets. For example (Mercury 1 hour =46.1 h of The Earth moon motion), in this
case (46.1 = 10.08 x 4.61) , the data doesn’t use (9.18) but (10.08).

I do this research
2nd
59
Notice
- How the rate (9.18) be created?
- Let's move step by step in following
o The 3 planets velocities total (112.2 km/s) = Pluto velocity (4.7 km/s) x 23.9
o By that (1 h of these 3 planets motion = 23.9 h of Pluto motion).
o And
o The 3 planets velocities total (112.2 km/s) be used again in face with a third
velocity which is (12.2 km/s) (= Uranus velocity + Neptune velocity)
o 112.2 km/s = (12.2 km/s) x (9.18)
o Means,
o The rate (9.18) between Pluto and Mercury motions be created by an effect
of the total velocity (112.2 km/s) in relative to (Uranus and Neptune
velocities total 12.2 km/s).
o Why?
o Because Uranus effects on Pluto day period and extends it to be 153.3 h
o Uranus effect on Pluto day period be found by Uranus using of Pluto day
period in (Planet 8 Days Cycle)
o On the other side, Uranus uses Pluto rate to the 3 planets. And by that 1 hour
of Mercury motion b = 24 hours of Uranus Motion, the next data will prove
that.

I do this research
2nd
60
8-4 Saturn Motion Rate Of Time
I- Data
(1)
Saturn moves daily 838080 km = the Earth moon displacement 88000 km x 9.52
(2)
Saturn diameter 120536 km = Earth diameter 12756 km x 9.5
(3)
Saturn orbital distance 1433.5 mkm = Earth orbital distance 149.6 mkm x 9.5
(4)
Earth axial tilt 23.4 deg = Saturn orbital inclination 2.5 deg x 9.4
(5)
Saturn Orbital Period 10747 days = 365.25 days x 29.53 days
(6)
2.4 mkm x 10747 days =25920 mkm = 17.75 mkm x 1461 days
II-Discussion
- The data shows that, the rate of time between Saturn and the Earth moon motions,
be used as a rate between many different data of Earth and Saturn.
- This feature is similar perfectly to Pluto data proportionality with Earth data.
- And also the data between Pluto and Mercury.
- The data tells that, the rate of time has a massive effect on the planets motions
data. This feature which we see frequently in different planets data.
- The data (1, 2 ,3 and 4) shows that the rate of time (9.5) creates a proportionality
between Saturn and Earth motions data.
- Equation. No.(5) shows that, Saturn Orbital Period be defined based on earth
orbital period and the moon orbital period. That means, the rate of time (9.5)
creates a proportionality between earth and Saturn motions data and this
proportionality causes Saturn orbital period to be produced as a result for this
proportionality.
Equation no. (6)
2.4 mkm x 10747 days =25920 mkm = 17.75 mkm x 1461 days

I do this research
2nd
61
2.4 mkm = (the moon motion distance daily) ( review the moon orbital motion)
10747 days = Saturn Orbital Period
17.75 mkm = the total distances be passed by the solar planets per solar day
(including the Earth moon motion distance)
1461 days = Earth Cycle (365 +365 +365 +366)
Notice
6.8 km/s x 59800 seconds =406000 km = 4.7 km/s x 86400 seconds
5.4 km/s x 59800 seconds = 2 x 160000 km (Uranus Circumference) (error 0.5%).

I do this research
2nd
62
Notice
II- Mercury Uranus Motions Rate of Time
- Mercury Uranus Distance = 2815.2 mkm
- Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours
- 2 x Mercury rotation periods = 2815.2 hours
- If 1 mkm = 1 hour, So the distance 2815.2 mkm be = 2 Mercury rotation periods
And
- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves during its rotation period (1407.6 h) a distance = 243
mkm (error 1%)
- 243 solar days = Venus rotation period
- If each 1 mkm be =1 solar days, the distance 240 mkm be = 243 days (error 1%)
Based on that
- Mercury as a player uses (1 mkm = 1 hour) and (1 mkm = 1 day =24 hours)
- That creates the rate (1 hour = 24 hours)
- But between whom? Almost
- Between Mercury and Uranus, means
- 1 hour of Mercury Motion =24 hours of Uranus Motion.
- This rate also doesn't depend on the planets velocities rates (where Mercury
velocity = 7 Uranus velocity)
Notice (1)
1 hour of Pluto Motion = 2.62 hours of Uranus Motion - Because
1 h or Mercury motion = 24 h of Uranus motion =9.18 h of Pluto motion
Notice (2)
153.3 hours = 2.62 hours x 58.66 hours (153.3 hours = Pluto Day Period)
58.66 solar days = Mercury Rotation Period

I do this research
2nd
63
9- Proof No. 4 (The Energy Trajectory Analysis)
9-1 Preface
9-2 The Inner Planets Motions (A Summary)
9-3 Jupiter Motion depends on the inner planets motions
9-4 Jupiter Motion transports the energy to the outer Planets
9-5 Jupiter Energy reaches to Pluto
9-1 Preface
- The 3rd
proof tells that,
- The Planets Motion Dependency shows a clear trajectory of energy passes through
the solar system. This energy trajectory starts from the inner planets to Jupiter to
Uranus to Pluto and then to Neptune and again to the inner planets. The energy
trajectory proves that planet motion depends on Its neighbor planet motion and not
on the sun.
- What should we do here?
- We should follow the energy trajectory to test if this trajectory is a real one.
- The proof tells,
o The Energy Be Started From The Inner Planets
o The Energy Is Sent From The Inner Planets To Jupiter
o The Energy Is Sent From Jupiter To Uranus
o The Energy Is Sent From Uranus To Pluto
o The Energy Is reflected From Pluto to Neptune
o The Energy Is Sent From Neptune to the inner planets again
- We move with the energy trajectory point after point to see if really the energy be
transported between these points.
- The energy trajectory proves that, Planet motion depends on its neighbor planet
motion.

I do this research
2nd
64
9-2 The Inner Planets Motions (A Summary)
- We have studied the inner planets in point (4-1) (The Inner Planets Motions)
- We have concluded that, the inner planets motion depend on an electric field be
found by the inner planets charges.
- So, the inner planets move by an electric field and their motion depend on their
data.
- The inner planets motions be transported to Jupiter.
- Please remember our hypothesis (The Distance = Energy)
9-3 Jupiter Motion depends on the inner planets motions
We have discussed this point before
- Please remember
4900 mkm = 360 mkm + 680 mkm + 940 mkm + 1433 mkm +1433 mkm (1%)
- Where
- 4900 mkm = Jupiter Orbital Circumference
- 360 mkm = Mercury Orbital Circumference
- 680 mkm = Venus Orbital Circumference
- 940 mkm = Earth Orbital Circumference
- 1433 mkm = Mars Orbital Circumference
- If we accept that, The Earth moon orbital circumference around the sun = 1433
mkm = Mars orbital circumference
- This data is discussed in (5-3 Jupiter Orbital Circumference Analysis)
Discussion
- The idea is that, the energy be sent from the inner planets to Jupiter and by this
energy Jupiter creates its orbital circumference that because. (where distance =
Energy).

I do this research
2nd
65
9-4 Jupiter Motion transports the energy to the outer Planets
- This point depends on Planet 8 days Cycle we have discussed in point No.
- (7-3 The Planets Motions Is A Team Motion (Planet 8 Days Cycle)).
- Let's remember the idea in following:
o Jupiter Receives The Energy From The Inner Planets, because
o Jupiter orbital circumference = the inner planets orbital circumferences total.
o Jupiter Transports The Energy To The Outer Planets by using planet 8 days
cycle and by that the energy reaches to Uranus and then to Pluto
o Planet 8 days cycle shows clearly the energy trajectory from Jupiter to
Uranus because the different distance always be = Jupiter diameter as we
have discussed in planet 8 days cycle.

The Solar System Machine Moves Completely Different From Newton Theory

The Solar System Machine Moves Completely Different From Newton Theory

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to The Solar System Machine Moves Completely Different From Newton Theory

Similar to The Solar System Machine Moves Completely Different From Newton Theory (20)

More from Gerges francis

More from Gerges francis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Solar System Machine Moves Completely Different From Newton Theory