How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii)

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found? (Newton is Wrong) (II)
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo –Egypt –22nd
November 2021
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planet Moves BY Light Motion
Paper hypothesis explanation
- The basic question in the solar system motion is (Do we understand the planets
real positions?)
- Newton Theory tells Planet moves by the sun mass gravity force, can that be real?
Of course not –Why? because
- The planets motions data show effects of Planets masses gravities on one another -
for example – The moon be created by the Earth gravity –that shows an effect of
Earth gravity on the moon creation and motion – based on that – Earth gravity
effect be seen in the moon creation and motion data – on the other side – No any
planet data refers to the sun gravity effect on it?
- Earth gravity is an example of Planets gravities effects on one another where the
planets data show clearly that, But no planet data refers to any effect of the sun
gravity on it! Why? What options we have to solve this dilemma?
- (a) Can we suppose that the sun mass is an imaginary one and not fact? Or
- (b) Can we suppose that the sun be in some position prevents its gravity effect on
the planets motions? to make this question more clear let’s ask –

I do this research
2nd
2
- Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance. Let's ask (Are the Sun,
Saturn and Uranus be on one line with an angle 180 degrees or 90 degrees?) Can
the planets positions create a distinguish in The Mass Gravity Using?
- But if no sun gravity be found why the planets revolve around the sun? we have
discussed this question before(Part No. I)
The solar planets can't move by Mass Gravity Force Generally because
- The solar system shows A Continuum Effect –means- some reason effects on
different planets to create these planets data in proportionality with this reason- as
example the rate (π3
) be used as a rate between 50% of all distances in the solar
system – how that can be possible? – the rate (π3
) be found by a force greater than
any planet and forces all planets to create their distances in the consideration with
this rate – this behavior be repeated with different rates as (2.48 and 4.61) each
rate of these 3 be used between 50% of all distances at least- also more rates be
found as (1.0725) where this one is used between 40% of distances in addition to
other data – this behavior is a continuum behavior be discovered in the solar
planets motions data
- The Continuum Effect disproves the theory of planet motion depends on mass
gravity – because the planets masses are so different and no proof that they are
distributed based on any geometrical design which enable The Continuum Effect
to be found. By that the mass gravity concept as general can't be used as a reason
for the solar planets motions.
Can light motion cause a planet motion?
- Let's imagine, We have a canal on which there are 9 waterwheels be created, the
waterwheel rotates based on the canal water motion – and the water motion
direction be perpendicular on the waterwheels rotation direction – although the
motions be perpendicular no waterwheel can rotate without the canal water
motion.

I do this research
2nd
3
- The fact is that,
- Matter is created out of light but the produced matter isn't separated from its parent
light beam but they move together in one unified motion by using different rates of
time.
- The solar planets be created out of one light beam and they move together one
unified general motion -
- That shows the concept reason- where the question (how the matter be created?)
can guide to the conclusion that (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion).
What role of mass gravity on the planets motions?
- The light motion energy creates planets matters with their orbital and internal
distances in a network form – the distances geometrical design defines the planets
motions trajectories and (to some extent) forces the planets to move through these
trajectories - BUT Planet mass gravity provides one more player can effect on the
motion and by that the mass gravity can enable the planet to move out of the
designed network by the light motion – as in the railways – the light creates the
motion trajectories and distances through which the planets should move – as the
railways on which the trains move but the train still can make a maneuver out of
the whole network of railways –this option be provided for the planet motion by
the mass gravity force
- Based on that
- The planets be similar to ships sail over seas –and the seas refer to light motions
which causes planet motion - where the ship doesn't always move in the sea waves
direction but can sometimes sail against the waves –the mass gravity force enables
the planet to do this option of motion and by that the planet actual motion be the
final balancing point between light motion effect on planets motions and the mass
gravity effect on them.

I do this research
2nd
4
Light and Planet Motions Rule
- The light moves on a circle circumference (2πr) and forces the planet to move on
this same circle radius (r)-
- The motions directions be perpendicular
- The planets motions depend on the rate (π3
) as we prove in the paper discussion.
Paper objective
- The Paper Proves That Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
Notice
- Many other proves can be added against Newton theory of the sun mass gravity –
such as – The sun is created after all planets creation and motion proving that no
planet moves depends on the sun mass gravity.
- The solar system be created of energy of one light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s,
where the known light velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) be created later as a side product
from the original light beam (1.16 mkm/s) proving that the planets were found and
moving before the sun and the sun rays creation.
(Please scan the figure (ORCID)

I do this research
2nd
5
Paper Contents
Subject Page No.
1- Introduction 7
2- Methodology 15
3- The Solar System Creation Description 17
3-1 The Solar System Creation Description 18
3-2 The Data Discussion 26
3-3 The (π) Definition 29
3-4 Light Motion Features Be Discovered In Planet Motion 35
4- The Continuum Effect Proof 36
4-1 The Continuum Effect Proof 37
4-2 Saturn Motion Analysis 43
4-3 Planet Diameter Analysis 69
4-4 Why do the planets revolve around the sun if there's no sun gravity? 71
5- The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time 72
5-1 Preface 73
5-2 The Planets Motions Rates Of Time 75
6- The Solar Planets Rates Of Time Analysis 79
6-1 Preface 80
6-2 Venus Motion Rate of time 81
6-3 Earth Motion Rate of time 83
6-4 Mars Motion Rate of time 85
6-5 Jupiter Motion Rate of time 87
6-6 Saturn Motion Rate of time 89
6-7 Uranus Motion Rate of time 91
6-8 Neptune Motion Rate of time 93
6-9 Pluto Motion Rate of time 95
6-10 The Planets Orbital Distances Test 97
6-11 One Law Controls The Planets Orbital Periods And Distances 102
6-12 The General Discussion 103
7- The Planets Motions Rates Of Time Effect Analysis 106
7-1 Preface 107
7-2 Planets Motions Rates Of Time And Distances Data 108
7-3 The Data Equal Distances 112
7-4 The Data and the planets velocities. 120
7-5 The Data Distances And Rates Of Time Interaction 124
7-6 The Data General Discussion 134
7-7 Mars, Jupiter and Saturn Motions Analysis 136
7-8 Why Saturn And The Moon Use Equal Rates Of Time? 141
7-9 Why Mercury Use A Double Of Its Orbital Distance? 146
7-10 The Rate (4.61) be used between Pluto and the moon motion 147
7-11 The Moon Orbital Motion Equation 151

I do this research
2nd
6
8- Planets Unified General Motion 167
8-1 The Planets Unified General Motion Description 168
8-2 The Solar Planets Motions Are Complementary One Another 170
8-3 The Solar Planets Move An Unified Motion (A Team Motion) 174
9- Mars Migration Theory 179
9-1 Mars Migration Theory 180
9-2 Pluto Migration Theory 183
9-3 Planets Migration Theories Proves 185
9-4 Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar Group? 188
10- The Sun Age Description 191
10-1 Preface 192
10-2 The Sun Circles The Earth 193
10-3The Rate (1.0725) 194
10-4 The Sun Diameter Analysis 197
10.5 The Sun And Earth Motions Rate Of Time (1 day =365.25 days) 200
10-6 The Sun Rays Creation 208
11- Light Beam (1.16 mkm/sec) Proves 214
11-1 The solar system Creation Theory 215
11-2 Light Beam (1.16 mkm/sec) Proves Discussion 220
12-The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form 257
12-1 Preface 258
12-2 The Continuum effect Through the Solar System Distances 260
12-3 The Solar System Distances Distribution 265
12-4 The Solar System Distances Dependency On One Another 269
Appendix No.1 The Solar System Equal Distances List 271
Claims Be Sent Against The Decision Of Nobel Prize For Physics 2021 273
References and Biography 278

I do this research
2nd
7
1-Introduction
- Again (We Have To Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity) Why?
- This question answers needs 4 additional questions to be explained as possible –
these 4 questions are
- (1) Can Light Motion Cause A Planet Motion?
- (2) Why does the mass gravity force fail to explain the planet motion?
- (3) Why The planets motions features contradicts the mass gravity force?
- (4) How does the solar planet move?
- (1) Can Light Motion Cause A Planet Motion?
- This question is a new form for the old question tells (Why Can't A Particle
Mechanical Properties Predict Its Electromagnetic Properties?)
- Because,
- It's supposed that there are 2 different laws control this particle properties.
- The distinguish between the matter world and mind world be found even in ancient
times and by that we may inherited it –
- But, the chemistry laws simply disprove this vision and shows that one law
controls the particle (all) properties and that means, this particle mechanical
proprieties should predicts it electromagnetic properties and the distinguish should
be disappeared with knowing the one law controls all properties of this particle.
- If we reach to the one law which predicts a particle electromagnetic properties
from its mechanical properties and vice versa, this one law will give us the
extension to explain how a light beam causes a planet motion.
- That means, the light can cause a planet motion but we can't understand how the
light does because a new concept of physics need to be discovered.
- Let's now try with the second question because it creates a very good vision for the
planet motion description –

I do this research
2nd
8
- (2) Why does the mass gravity force fail to explain the planet motion?
- We have a basic difficulty to accept a planet motion be done by the mass gravity-
generally it's impossible to use the mass gravity force to cause a planet motion –
let's try to explain that in following
- We have 2 players which are the sun on one side and the planets on the other side
– from the solar planets we choose Jupiter – So, we have the sun on one side and
Jupiter on the other side – both have masses and effect on the planets to move
based on the hypothesis tells ( a planet moves by mass gravity)
- The sun mass is 1050 times Jupiter mass – by that – if Jupiter effects on Earth by a
force = (a) the sun should effect on Earth by a force = (1000 a) –
- This calculation for explanation and takes the distances into consideration –
- I want to say that
- If any planet mass effects on any other planet mass, and if the sun mass is a real
one and not imaginary, as a result, the sun should have (more great effect on this
same planet) because of the massive mass – as a result – the sun mass effect should
be seen and the other planets shouldn't – perfectly – as Newton told– the sun is the
player and the other planets effects on one another is a trivial effect
- This description is mistaken and disproved not only because the planets order
disproves the gravitation equation or because the planets velocities disprove the
mass gravity concept – but because
- The planets motions data show effect other planets motions data
- Example no. (1)
- The Earth moon rotate a cycle called Metonic (19 years) and Uranus orbital
distance = 19 Earth orbital distance – if Earth and Uranus velocities are equal
while Uranus revolves around the sun one complete revolution Earth would
revolves 19 revolutions (19 years)
- I see that as effect of Uranus on the moon motion - especially because – Earth
Cycle = 4 years (365 + 365 +365 +366 = 1461 days)

I do this research
2nd
9
- And
- (Uranus mass / Earth mass) = (Uranus diameter / the moon diameter) (error 1%)
- Example no. (2)
- Jupiter moves during 10921 sec a distance = 142984 km =Jupiter diameter
- (10921 km = The Earth Moon Circumference)
- And
- 4900 mkm(Jupiter orbital circumference)=449197 km(Jupiter circumference) x10921 km
- And
- Jupiter mass / Earth mass = 2 Jupiter orbital periods / the moon orbital period
- Thousands of such data can be provided – and we have limited options – If we try
to explain how this data be produced we may attribute that effects of the planets
with great masses on planets with small masses – this conclusion causes serious
difficulty because the sun mass is more greater than these planets and if these
planets have these effects on data the sun should have greater effects on the data
but the data shows no effect of the sun! what can we do? Can we suppose the sun
mass is an imaginary mass? the other option is to remove simply the data and
believe Newton theory as it regardless the thousands of contradictions made
between this wrong theory and the planets motions data.
- Shortly
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity as its current vision should be removed
from the physics book because it creates contradictions with the planets motions
data – the gravitation equation is wrong and the sun gravity is wrong – the theory
basics are wrong – also the planets velocities are created in proportionality with
one another disproving the mass gravity force as a reason of planet velocity – also
– the planets velocities decreasing from Mercury to Pluto – this feature can't prove
the sun mass gravity – because it's one feature of the whole solar system the
planets orbital distances be increased and their velocities be decreased – these
features be defined by the geometrical design and can’t prove the sun gravity.

I do this research
2nd
10
- Example no. (3)
- Venus velocity = Uranus velocity x 5.1
- Mars velocity = Pluto Velocity x 5.1
- The moon velocity = Neptune Velocity x 5.1
- This data is an example only shows that the planets velocities aren't created by
mass gravity force because the velocities proportionality aren't supported by the
masses rates.
- Shortly
- Newton is mistaken because no sun gravity and the gravitation equation is wrong
- Now
- The mass gravity concept generally can't be used for a planet motion – because –
the planets motions data show effect of one another – and the sun mass is more
greater than the planets –if the data be produced by planets masses gravity effect
the sun should have more greater effect on data but the data shows no effect of the
sun – as seen in the previous examples I write planets names but no one reference
to the sun – means – we have 2 options – whether to refuse the mass gravity
concept as generally to be a reason of planets motions or to suppose the sun mass
is an imaginary one -
- Let's answer the third question may the vision be more clear
- (3) Why The planets motions features contradict the mass gravity force?
- We have 3 reasons to refuse the mass gravity generally as a reason for the planet
motion…
- (1st
Reason) The Continuum Effect
- (2nd
Reason) The Planets Motions Data Transportation
- (3rd
Reason) The Selective Relationships Among The Planets
- The previous features tell that no another player can create the planets motions
except the light motion – shortly only the light motion can do that! -

I do this research
2nd
11
- (1st
Reason) The Continuum Effect
- The continuum effect means an effect continuous and can't be prevented – for
example we find that 50% of all distances in the solar system be rated by one rate
as (2.48) or (4.61) or (31)
- These are defined rates – and the solar planets orbital and internal distances total
be =55 distances – if any one test these rates will find that each rate be used
between more than 50% of all distances –it's a continuum effect – as when you see
100 persons dressed by similar dress you think immediately that they work in one
establishment – no gravitation equation be used here – no mass gravity – the
distances be created as one network depending on one geometrical design – for
that reason there are rates work continuously through huge number of distances –
- The continuum effect is a light motion feature –
- In fact the continuum effect is a decisive proof against the mass gravity generally
as a reason for planet motion.
- Shortly, The planets masses are different greatly, and any explanation of planets
motions depend on the planets masses should create separated points of system and
not a continuous one – the continuum effect can't be produced by the planets
masses gravity – the planets move by some force (different in nature) completely
from the mass gravity because the motion shows the continuum effect which can
never be produced by the planets masses gravity
- (2nd
Reason) The Planets Motions Data Transportation
- The planets motions data transportation is my claim day after day from very long
time – and till now no explanation how the planets motions data be transported –
- Thousands of examples can be provided – let's use one example
- Example no. (4)
- 406000 km (Pluto motion distance per a solar day= 4.61 x 88000 km
- 708.7 hours (the moon day period) = 4.61 x 153.3 h (Pluto Day Period)
(88000 km The Moon Daily Displacement)

I do this research
2nd
12
- But
- 5906 mkm (Pluto orbital distance) = 6.3 x 940 mkm (Earth orbital circumference)
- 153.3 h (Pluto day period) = 6.3 x 24.3 h (Earth day period 24 h error 1.4% )
- And
- Pluto moves during its day period a distance = Earth motion distance during its day
period = the moon displacements total during 29.53 days (error 1%)
- These 3 points of motions data show the meaning of the data transportation among
Pluto on one side and the Earth and its moon on the other side
- Notice
- This is the simple direct data but with more analysis we can catch more deep
transportation of data –for example –
- Tan (12.19 deg) x 708.7 h (the moon day period ) =153.3 h (Pluto day period)
- The angle 12.19 deg = the moon motion daily angle 13.17 deg – 0.98562 deg
(=Earth motion daily angle)
- I try to show that, a deep geometrical machine be used for data transportation
between the planets – which can't be done by any planet motion –
- (3rd
Reason) The Selective Relationships Among The Planets
- The selective relationship is some very complex feature of the planets motions, for
example
- Uranus motion effects on the Earth moon motion and causes it to move Metonic
Cycle (19 years)- I suppose Uranus does that because Uranus orbital distance = 19
Earth orbital distance – that means- if Uranus and Earth Velocities are equal while
Uranus revolves around the sun one complete revolution the Earth would revolve
19 revolutions (19 years) – based on this data I supposed Uranus does –
- Another vision tells that the number (19) be found by pure coincidence of numbers
and we should refuse the idea of Uranus motion effect on the moon motion – by

I do this research
2nd
13
that we retreat one more step to the back and will loss the planets data supposing
it's useless and again follow the great Newton!!
- And the situation is that- we may use the planets data and stand before it without
explanation or to follow the wrong theory without understanding!
- Why does Uranus effect on the Earth moon motion if it's a fact? why not Jupiter
which is greater in mass and shorter in distance? I don't create the number (19), I
just found it!
- We may remove this (confused) number (19) and get a rest at end of this fighting
- But
- Why Earth moves in its day period (24 h) a distance = Pluto motion distance in its
day period (153.3)? (error 1%) – it's better if Earth moves a distance = Mars
motion distance in place of Pluto which is so far and its day period is so long? I
neither create the data nor know how it's created
- The fighting can be continuous till we all together go to the great Newton and sit
down beside him waiting for someone understands a little better.
- If one finds the machine by which the planets motions data be transported from a
planet to another – that may create an approach to solve this question of selective
relationship
- Notice
- If some equation be discovered proves that the planets masses be distributed based
on some geometrical rule enables the solar system to create the distances into a
Network form and provides the chance of the continuum effect- that may change
the vision again and gives hope for the mass gravity concept as a reason for the
planets motions
- (4) How does the solar planet move?
- The planets motions data analysis prove the planet moves depending on light
motion – the paper tries to prove this fact.
- Let's take look on the paper contents in following:

I do this research
2nd
14
- Paper Contents
- The Continuum Effect Found In The Planets Motions Data
(Be discussed in point no. 4 of this paper)
- The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
(Be discussed in points no. 5-6-7 of this paper)
- The Planets Move One Unified Motion
- Mars Migration And The Sun Creation
(Be discussed in points no. 9 and 10 of this paper)
- A light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec be found and effects on the solar
system motion.
- The Solar System distances be created in a network form as one group of
distances

I do this research
2nd
15
2- Methodology
- I use the planets motions data analysis in comparison with the theories which try to
explain the planets motions-
- Shortly
- I suppose the planet motion data be similar to a creature genes and by analysis of
this data we should discover this planet motion features.
- Let's use one example to explain how this method works?
- Example No. 1
- 778.6 mkm = 1.0725 x 720.7 mkm (Mercury Jupiter Distance)
- 720.7 mkm = 1.0725 x 671 mkm (Venus Jupiter Distance)
- 671 mkm = 1.0725 x 629 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance)
- 629 mkm = (1.0725)2
x 550.7 mkm (Mars Jupiter Distance)
- 550.7 mkm = (1.0725) x 511 mkm
- 4900 mkm = (1.0725) x 4495.1 mkm (Neptune Orbital Distance) (1.6%)
- 1375 mkm = (1.0725) x 1284 mkm (Earth Saturn Distance)
- The data shows that, the distances between Jupiter and the other planets be rated
by the same rate (1.0725). Why?
- The next question should be (How the space be created? we need to ask before if
the space be created or found without creation?)
- That's the useful result of the planet motion data analysis, it gives us new direction
of thinking. No one of us knows how the space be created. but no one will accept
that Jupiter (all) distances be rated by the same rate (1.0725) as a result for pure
coincidence of numbers – the simple conclusion is that – one geometrical reason
must be found behind.
- Then, New vision be seen in this data analysis because, the data shows that the
distances can't be created independently because they are related to one planet
(Jupiter) and depend on the same rate (1.0725) that tells one geometrical reason
caused to create this data.

I do this research
2nd
16
- We may conclude based on that, The distances be created in Some Network Form
- Means, no distance be created independently from the others on the contrary the
distances be created together in a network form and based on one geometrical
design. This is a different vision from Newton's theory.
- We should notice that, the previous data isn't exceptional example, on the contrary,
the rate (1.0725) controls 40% of all distances in the solar system. there must be a
geometrical reason for this using. (These distances list be inserted in appendix no.1
of this paper)
- I want to say
- The planets motions data analysis correct our understanding toward the solar
planets motions and save our understanding from the imaginary ideas –
- We discuss the solar system distances network theory in this paper in point no.
(12) in which we should prove that the distances can't be created individually or
independently, on the contrary, the distances be created together in a network form
and based on one geometrical design which makes the solar system as a chess
board - each piece moves in comparison with the others.
- Shortly
- The planets motions data analysis put the planets motions data in comparison with
the theories trying to explain how this data be created and to test the theory trying
to prove if it's sufficient and trustee.

I do this research
2nd
17
3- The Solar System Creation Description
3-1 The Solar System Creation Description
3-2 The Data Discussion
3-3 The (π) Definition
3-4 Light Motion Features Be Discovered In Planet Motion

I do this research
2nd
18
3-1 The Solar System Creation Description
- The solar system creation depended on the rate (π3
)
- Where
- The rate (π2
) creates the matter
- And
- The rate (π) causes the matter motion
- Let's summarize the whole description in following
- The matter is created out of light but the produced matter doesn't separate from its
parent light but moves with it by using different rates of time
- The light creates the matter and space by energy by that the space is created with
the matter in the same process and with proportional dimensions one another –
- The light uses the space as a conveyor of motion among the planets but the space
doesn't work as a mechanical conveyor of motion because the transportation of
motion among the planets isn't done mechanically
- The light creates the space in a geometrical form enable the planets to move
through. The rate (π) shows that the space must be created in circular or curved
form, this geometrical feature is a necessary one because the space geometrical
design forces (to some extent) the planets to move through the created defined
distances and trajectories – the planets motions by that be similar to water motion
from a mountain to a valley – I don't mean the using of potential energy- but I
mean – the using of a geometrical design.
- Based on this description the space doesn’t work as a mechanical conveyor for
motion but it works as a conveyor based on a geometrical design created by energy
provision and distribution
- We need to notice that – the creation of matter and space is a continuous task and
not a historical one – as we see a great tree we realize simply that it depends on a
continuous nutrition – similar to that – the matter and space creation isn't a
historical event but it costs energy daily where this energy be provided by light

I do this research
2nd
19
motion – so while we see the matter and space in front of us – we realize that both
(the matter and space) are similar to a blackboard on which the light writes its
motion data. where by this motion the light provides the required energy to save
the matter and space existence.
- That means, the light is the basic player behind the seen which provides the
required energy of matter and space life – where the light creation of space
provides the required distances and trajectories for planets motions which enable
the planets to move through.
- The light motion in this process be similar to water motion in a canal on which
there are 9 waterwheels be built – while the canal water moves it causes the 9
waterwheels to rotate – and while the water motion direction is different from the
waterwheels rotation direction – but no one waterwheel can rotate without the
water motion – by that – if the water motion reverses its motion direction the
waterwheels will revere their rotation direction also
- Based on this description we have 2 different worlds
- The light motion world which provides the required energy, and
- The matter and space world where the matter moves through the space by using
the provided energy of light motion.
- Notice
- The mass gravity force be found in the planet motion- the mass gravity is the force
which enables the planet to move out of the geometrical design designed by light
motion – the light creates a design for planets motions trajectories and by using the
space geometrical design the light forces (to some extent) the planets to move
through these trajectories (and these trajectories of motions must be useful because
through which the planets may receive the energy needed for motion, where this
energy be provided by light motion) – But the planets can use the mass gravity
force to move out of this design of motion and can choose to move through other
trajectories based on their mass gravity force ( these trajectories must be harmful

I do this research
2nd
20
because the planets have to pay energy through which for their motions, by that the
planet may loss the energy it received before)
- From the previous description we can conclude why it's difficult to explain the
planet motion – because the planet moves as a ship sails over sea and the planet
actual motion be produced as a balancing point between the light motion effect on
the planet motion and the mass gravity effect on it. that creates difficulties for the
motion explanation.
- By this description we realize that, the planet can't move for long time depends on
its mass gravity because it losses energy and the planet may be perished if does
that, also this conclusion is logical because the hypothesis tells that the matter is
created out of light and logically it can't move for long time out of its source
- The double slit experiment can be used as a good example to explain this
description
- Example no. (1)
- I suppose the interference of light coherence produced by Young Experiment is a
suitable model for the solar system creation.
- Mars migration theory tells that, Mars was the second planet after Mercury with
original orbital distance (84 mkm) where Pluto was the Mercury moon, before the
planets migration.
- In that time Uranus was in place of Pluto with orbital distance 5906 mkm and
Neptune was in place of Uranus with orbital distance 2872.5 mkm
- Mars migration theory is discussed and proved in this current paper in point no.(9)
- By this order, the solar group be very similar to the produced interference – just if
we accept that we see the bright fringes as planets and the dark fringes we see as
distances and space (why we see the bright fringes as matters? We should answer
this question later)
- In this case the planets order perfectly be similar to the interference – where the
greatest fringe (Jupiter) be in the middle – and the fringes (planets) be decreased in

I do this research
2nd
21
data gradually on both sides – by that the double slit experiment interference will
be similar perfectly to the solar planets order.
- The geometrical distribution of the bright and dark fringes shows that the light
motion creates geometrical rules, means, the geometrical rules be discovered in
planets motions be found as effects of light motion on planets motions.
- If we accept that the dark fringes we see as space – that shows simply – the space
dimensions be created in proportionality with matter dimensions – and that
answers many old question – for example – why we see the sun disc = the moon
disc? Because (the sun diameter / moon diameter) = (Earth orbital distance /Earth
moon distance), So why the diameters rate = the distances rate?? Because the
space dimensions be created in proportionality with matters dimensions.
- The double slit experiment (young experiment) gives an explanation how the
distances among the planets be created in a network form and not as an individual
distances – as we discuss and prove in point no. (12)
- Also Young experiment explains the continuum effect origin which we have
discovered and proved in the solar system motion. (We have discussed the
continuum effect in details in point 4)
- We still need to notice that the mass gravity force gives the solar planets motions
one additional feature of motion than young experiment interference – the mass
gravity adds one more force as a basic player for planet motion
- The basic difference between young experiment interference and the solar planets
motions is that (Young is an outer observer), that means, Young himself isn't a
point inside a bright fringe nor a dark fringe – he's an outer observer
- But we are inner observers that because we have bodies – means- the light which
produced the planets matters produced also our bodies by that we are in position
similar to these planets themselves – we are inner observers found under the same
effect- for that reason our experience about the experiment results be more wide
than Young analysis. (but let's ask, why do we see the light as matter?)

I do this research
2nd
22
- Why Do We See The Light Beam (Or Bright Fringe) As Matter?
- Let's suppose the human mind uses light velocity in realization process, means, we
realize the outer world because our mind works by a velocity 300000 km/s
- It's just a hypothesis, let's test it
- If 2 light beams travel beside each other how each one will see the other? as a
particle! Why? because no difference in their velocities –
- Simply, if our mind works by light velocity – the result will be that, we will see all
light beams around as matters and the low motion objects we will see as light
beams because of the difference in velocities…
- If this idea be correct – it will explain the confusion of Lorentz Transformations,
where Lorentz told that (Particle own length will be contracted if this particle
travels by high velocity motion) and we have to ask Why?? what's the relationship
between the particle dimensions and its motion velocity? The relationship is found
from our realization for this particle dimensions – because we realize the particle
dimensions and data by using light velocity in our mind and by that when the
particle travels with high velocity motion it effects on the basic realization process
components- means- the matter is created out of light by effect of the human mind
realization process on the universe.
- This idea tells shortly
- The matter is created out of light beam by effect of a human mind.
- Means, The Universe Is Created Of Light Beams, But
- Our minds creates The Matter
- Notice
- The human mind effects on matter creation interacts with light motion because the
universe be created based on the rate (π3
) which we should discuss in the data
discussion point no. (3-2) where the matter is created based on the rate (π2
) and the
matter motion be created based on the rate (π)

I do this research
2nd
23
- What's The Earth Moon Role in The Solar Planets Motions Design?
- We have 2 data can help to answer this question which are
- (1st
Data)
- The moon orbital radius at apogee =406000 km = the solar planets diameters total
- The moon orbital radius at perigee =363000 km = the outer planets diameters total
(error %1)
- The distance between perigee and apogee (space only without the moon diameter)
= 39525 km = the inner planets diameters total = Earth circumference (error1%)
- (2nd
Data)
- Uranus Axial Tilt (97.8 deg) declines on The Moon Axial Tilt (6.7 deg) with an
angle = 91.1 degrees but
- Uranus Axial Tilt (97.8 deg) Is Perpendicular on The Moon Orbit (90 deg),
because the moon orbit declines on the moon axial tilt with (1.1 deg)
- The idea tells that
- The light motion causes the planet motion and because of that the light motion
direction be perpendicular on the planets motions direction
- The perpendicularity between Uranus axial tilt and the moon orbit may be a
reference for this perpendicularity between the light motion and the planets
motions – that means- the light motion direction be perpendicular on the planets
motions and this perpendicularity be done in the moon orbit – that gives hope to
explain the previous data – the Earth moon based on that be the most important
moon in the solar system –
- The following data add more bright for the moon importance and its reason
- (1) 10921 km x 27.3 days = 298143 km
- This equation tells, if the moon rotates around its axis one time every day as earth
does, the moon will pass during its orbital period (27.3 days) a distance = 300000
km = light motion distance for 1 second (error 0.7%) (that because the moon
circumference =10921 km)

I do this research
2nd
24
- (2) 10921 km x 86400 sec = 940 mkm
- This equation tells, if Earth revolves around the sun a complete revolution (940
mkm) during one solar day only (86400 seconds), the moon circumference (10921
km) will be = Earth motion distance for 1 second period of time
- (3) 43000 km x 27.3 days =1.16 mkm (error 1%)
- This equation tells, if the moon is a point without circumference and moves from
perigee to apogee one time every day and on next day moves from apogee to
perigee on one day – and continues by this same behavior along month – the moon
would move during its orbital period (27.3 days) a distance = 1.16 mkm = light
supposed velocity motion for 1 second
- Notice
- The light velocities are
- (1) light known velocity 300000 km pr second
- And
- (2) light supposed velocity 1.16 mkm per second (we have discussed and proved
this supposed velocity of light frequently before)
- I want to show that – the moon data refers to light velocity frequently that may be
proof of the light motion direction perpendicularity on planets motions direction
where this perpendicularity be done in the moon orbit.
- For the moon orbit analysis please read my paper
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (II)
https://www.academia.edu/45181646/The_Moon_Orbital_Motion_Geometry_II_
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-orbital-motion-geometry-ii

I do this research
2nd
25
- Is There Any Proof For The Light Motion Direction Perpendicularity On The
Planets Motions Direction?
- Let's remember the canal water example
- We have a canal has moving water and on this canal we have 9 waterwheels which
rotate by the canal water motion – the canal water moves horizontally – but the
waterwheels rotates vertically – and by that – we see the directions of motions are
perpendicular –
- For the actual motion of planets we have 2 basic rates which are (2.86 and 31) the
first rate we have discussed in Part no. (1) of this paper and the second rate (31) we
should discuss in the next point (3-2)
- 31 x 2.86 = 88.7
- 90 degrees = 88.7 degrees + 1.3 degrees
- And
- 1.3 degrees = Jupiter orbital inclination where Jupiter is the basic planet in the
solar system – this data may give a proof for the perpendicularity – we have to test
the 2 rates because based on them we create out concept.
- Because of that we will discuss the rate (31 = π3
) in the next point – to test if this
rate should be considered the solar system basic one

I do this research
2nd
26
3-2 The Data Discussion (The Rate 31 = π3
)
I - Data
Distances
778.6 mkm (Jupiter orbital distance) x 2 = 50.3 mkm (Mercury Venus distance) x 31
778.6 mkm (Jupiter orbital distance) x π =78.3 mkm (Earth Mars distance) x 31
1205 mkm (Saturn Mars distance) x 2 =78.3 mkm (Earth Mars distance) x 31
1284 mkm (Saturn Earth distance) = 41.4 mkm (Earth Venus distance) x 31
2814.6 mkm (Uranus Mercury distance) = 91.7 mkm (Earth Mercury distance) x 31
2644.6 mkm (Uranus Mars distance) x 2 = 170 mkm (Mercury Mars distance) x 31
2πx 2723 mkm (Uranus Earth distance) =550.7 mkm (Mars Jupiter distance) x 31
3716.5 mkm (Jupiter Neptune distance) =119.7 mkm (Mars Venus distance) x 31
5127 mkm (Jupiter Pluto distance) x 4 = 654.9 mkm (Jupiter Saturn distance) x 31
100733 mkm (the planets orbital circumferences total) = 1622.7 mkm x 2 x 31
(1622.7 km = Uranus Neptune Distance)
37100 mkm (Pluto orbital circumference) = 1205 mkm (Saturn Mars distance) x 31
32200 mkm x 2 = 2094 mkm (Jupiter Uranus distance) x 31
(32200 mkm= Pluto orbital circumference – Jupiter orbital circumference)
(Max error 1%)
629 mkm (Saturn Jupiter distance) x 2 = 41.4 mkm (Earth Venus distance) x 31
28244 mkm (Neptune orbital circumference) = 929 mkm (Earth Jupiter distance) x 31
2π x 3061.6 mkm (Saturn Neptune distance) = 629 mkm (Saturn Jupiter distance) x 31
(Max error 2%)

I do this research
2nd
27
Periods
10747 days (Saturn orbital period) = 346.6 days (the nodal year) x 31
2 x 153.3 h (Pluto day period) = 9.9 h (Jupiter day period) x 31
10500 = 339 x 31
Diameters
378675 km (Saturn Circumference) = 12104 km (Venus Diameter) x 31

I do this research
2nd
28
II –Discussion
- The solar distances total be =55 distances
- The previous distances are 25 distances which equals 50% of all distances
- Let' summarize the continuum meaning shortly in following:
- The continuum means a force moves among the data forms the data to be in some
form- this force can't be prevented by any planet force because it forms all data –
as we have seen – no force prevented the rate (31 = π3
) because this rate forms the
distances of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus or Mars… by that the force of this rate (31) is
greater than all planets force – here we don't deal with separated rigid bodies but
we deal one some textile or a chess board – each point is created based on the
others and in proportionality with them – by this meaning we discuss the solar
system distances as a network – where these distances can't be created individually
from one another – we deal here with one network of distances – no gravitation
equation be used here to define any distance – no mass gravity – we have a
geometrical system by which all distances be created.
- We notice that the continuum effect is a feature of light motion, by that, the
previous data can be used as a proof for the claim light motion be used as engine
of the train where the solar planets be considered as the train carriages
- The continuum effect meaning is discussed and proved in point no. (4) of this
paper and also the solar system distances creation in a network form be discussed
in point no. (12) of this paper.
- The previous discussion is a comment only on the data of the rate (31 = π3
)
because this rate has a massive effect on the planets motions.

I do this research
2nd
29
3-3 The (π) Definition
I- Data
DISTANCES
(1)
5906 mkm (Pluto orbital distance) = 2π x 940 mkm (Earth orbital circumference)
(2)
4267 mkm (Neptune Mars distance) = 2π x 680 mkm (Venus orbital circumference)
(3)
4495.1 mkm (Neptune orbital distance) = 2π x 720.7 mkm (Mercury Jupiter distance)
(4)
9007 mkm (Saturn orbital circumference)= 2π x 1433 mkm (Mars orbital circumference)
(5)
4495.1 mkm (Neptune orbital distance) = 2π x 720.7 mkm (Mercury Jupiter distance)
(6)
202318 mkm = 2π x 32200 mkm = 28244 mkm + 2 x 87000 mkm
(202318 mkm = 2 x The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total)
(32200 mkm = The difference between Pluto and Jupiter orbital circumferences)
(7)
25920 mkm = 2π x 4125 mkm (Venus Saturn Circumference)
(25920 mkm = light motion distance during a solar day "light velocity 0.3 mkm/s")
(8)
25920 mkm = 2π x 4125 mkm (Venus Saturn Circumference)
(25920 mkm = light motion distance during a solar day "light velocity 0.3 mkm/s")
PERIODS
(9)
4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) = 2π x 687 days (Mars Orbital Period)
4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) = 4π x 346.6 days (The Nodal Year)

I do this research
2nd
30
(10)
365.25 days (Earth orbital period) = 2π x 58.56 days (Mercury rotation Period) (1%)
(11)
30589 days (Uranus orbital period) = 2π x 4900 days
And
1106 days = 2π x 175.94 days
(12)
π2
hours = 9.9 hours (Jupiter Day period) (error 0.3%)
(π2
/9.9) =(360/361)
(13)
9 x Uranus day period (17.2 h) = 2π x Mars rotation period 24.6 h
(14)
4222.6 h (Mercury day period) = 2π x 671 h
And
171.6 h = 2π x 27.3 h (the moon orbital period)
175.94 days (Mercury day period) x 24 h = 171.6x 24.6 h (Mars rotation period)
687 days (Mars orbital period) x 24 h = 671 x 24.6 h
ANGLES
(15)
177.4 deg (Venus Axial Tilt) = 2π x 28.3 deg (Neptune Axial Tilt)
(16)
118.3 deg (Neptune Axial Tilt 28.3 deg + 90 deg) = 2π x 19 deg (error 1%)
(the moon orbit regresses 19 degrees yearly)
(17)
7.8 deg = 2.5 deg (Saturn orbital inclination) x 2π
(7.8 deg = Uranus axial tilt 97.8 deg – 90 deg)

I do this research
2nd
31
II –Discussion
- Why does the rate (2π) controls many values in the solar planets motions data?
- The difficulty is clear because
- The using of the rate (2π) doesn't show a clear geometrical rule by that the data be
seen as scattering points of data- but on the other side no explanation why it's
found? The usual answer (pure coincidence of numbers) will just kill the
understanding try…
- Equation no. (6) may help us to understand much better – but before to discuss it
let's write the idea as clear as possible in following:
- The planet moves by a light motion – that means- the light is the train engine and
its causes the train carriages to move- the train carriages are similar to the planets –
by that the real engine is the light motion – and clearly the planet moves by light
motion
- The motion of light and planet be designed geometrically –shortly and clearly –
the light moves along the circle circumference (2πr) and causes the planet to move
along this same circle radius (r) – this is the motion system be found between light
and planet motion-
- That causes the rate (2π) to be used so frequently through the solar system in
different data – please note
- The planets revolve around the sun in complete revolutions, the planet elliptical
trajectory be considered by the light motion as a radius of a circle –and the light
moves along this circle circumference – that explains why the light motion doesn't
pass through the planets motions trajectories – the light travels along outer edge of
the planet motion area.
- Notice
- This description gives a massive significance for Pluto orbital distance (5906
mkm) because this point is so important in the distinguish between light and planet
motions – Noteworthy that, the distance (32200 mkm) be found based on Jupiter

I do this research
2nd
32
and Pluto distances – that because the light motion distinguish between the inner
and the outer planets, by that, the light motion be found on Jupiter point as the
outer edge of the inner planets and on Pluto point as the outer edge of the outer
planets.
- Shortly
- The planets move depending on light motion and the light and planet move
together one unified motion – because the matter is created out of light
- The light moves along a circle circumference (2πr) and causes planet to move on
this circle radius (r) by that light and planet move together one unified motion by
using different rates of time
Now let's discuss proves for this idea –equation no. (6) be the first proof
Equation no.(6)
202318 mkm = 2π x 32200 mkm = 28244 mkm + 2π x 27705 mkm
(202318 mkm = 2 x The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total)
(32200 mkm = The difference between Pluto and Jupiter orbital circumferences)
(27705 mkm = Neptune orbital circumference 28244 mkm –Venus orbital circumference 680mk)
- The planets (Jupiter and Pluto) move and cause the distance 32200 mkm to be
created but the distance 202318 mkm be created as = 2π x 32200 mkm =
- We have supposed that, a light beam its velocity = 1.16 mkm/s be found in the
solar system –
- This light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) travels during 2 solar days (2 x 86400 s)
a distance = 200448 mkm = 202318 mkm (error 1%)
- The data simply shows the distinguish between light motion and planet motion
with the rate (2π)
- The distance 202318 mkm be divided into 28244 mkm (Neptune orbital
circumference) and 27705 mkm = the difference between Neptune and Venus
orbital circumferences typically as the distance 32200 mkm-
- The repeated using of the same behavior confirms it's origin is a geometrical rule

I do this research
2nd
33
- Shortly
- The equation tells that, the light motion be done on the distance (202318 mkm)
and causes the planets (Jupiter and Pluto) to move and to define the distance
(32200 mkm) by their motions
- This behavior is used continuously in the solar system motion.
- Now let's provide one more example for this behavior using
Additional Equation no.(a)
4900 mkm = 2π x 778.6 mkm =1.16 mkm/s x 4224 seconds
- Where
- 4900 mkm = Jupiter orbital circumference
- 778.6 mkm = Jupiter orbital distance
- Equation no. (a) tells that,
- The light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) travels during 4224 seconds a distance =
4900 mkm- If 1 second of light motion be = 1 hour of Mercury motion the period
4222.6 h = Mercury day period (very near to 4224 h)
- Mercury moves during its day period (4222.6 h) a distance = 720.7 mkm
- We have 2 motions here – light motion and planet motion – be done in the same
period of time if 1 second of light motion be = 1 hour of Mercury motion
- Let's remember the rule
- Light moves on the circle circumference (2πr) and forces the planet to move on
this same circle radius (r),
- Now light moves on (4900 mkm) and should force Mercury to move on the radius
(778.6 mkm) but in fact Mercury moves during its day period (4222.6 hours)
a distance =720.7 mkm!
- 778.6 mkm =1.0725 x 720.7 mkm
- The rate (1.0725) controls 40% of all distances in the solar system and it shows the
continuum effect on the solar system distances creation – as many other rates
- The distances list of the rate (1.0725) be in appendix no. 1 of this paper

I do this research
2nd
34
- The explanation of this rate (1.0725) to answer why it's found, tells that, this rate
(1.0725) be found as a result for Lorentz Length Contraction phenomenon
- As a result
- Mercury indeed moves 778.6 mkm but the distance be contracted by the rate
(1.0725) and be only 720.7 mkm – a similar event is occurred for the Earth moon
motion – while its daily motion distance be 2.574 mkm as Earth but the rate
(1.0725) caused this distance to be contracted to 2.4 mkm per a solar day that
makes the moon velocity = (27.78 km/s) and not equal Earth (29.8 km/s) we
discuss that in the moon orbital motion description point no. (7-11)
- Shortly
- Mercury moves on the radius (r) while the light moves on the circumference (2πr)
but the rate (1.0725) caused to contract the distance from 778.6 mkm to 720.7 mkm
- This is the second using of this same geometrical rule

I do this research
2nd
35
3-4 Light Motion Features Be Discovered In Planet Motion
- The matter is created out of light and doesn’t separate its parent light beam but
moves with it in one unified motion by using different rates of time
- The solar planets be created out of one light beam and they move together in one
unified motion by using different rates of time
- This theory tells, light motion feature must be discovered in planets motion
- In following we refer to the basic light motion features which are discovered in the
planets motions – where these features are proved an discussed in the referred
points of discussion the paper discussion
- Light Motion Features Be Used In Planets Motions:
(1) The Continuum Effect Found In The Planets Motions Data
(2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
(Be discussed in points no. 5-6-7 of this paper)
(3) A light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec be found and effects on the solar
system motion.
(4) The Solar System distances be created in a network form as one group of
distances

I do this research
2nd
36
4- The Continuum Effect Proof
4-1 The Continuum Effect Proof
4-2 Saturn Motion Analysis
4-3 Planet Diameter Analysis
4-4 Why do the planets revolve around the sun if there's no sun gravity?

I do this research
2nd
37
4-1 The Continuum Effect Proof
I - Data
(1) (Distances)
2 x 149.6 mkm (Earth orbital distance) = 119.7 mkm (Venus Mars distance) x 2.48
227.9 mkm (Mars orbital distance) =91.7 mkm (Mercury Earth Distance) x 2.48
2 x 680 mkm (Venus orbital Circumference) =550.7 mkm (Jupiter Mars distance) x 2.48
778.6 mkm (Jupiter orbital distance) = 2π x 550.7 mkm (Venus Mercury distance) x 2.48
720.7mkm (Mercury Jupiter distance)= π x 91.7 mkm (Mercury Earth Distance) x 2.48 (1%)
1375 mkm (Mercury Saturn distance) = 550.7 mkm (Venus Mercury distance) x 2.48
1325 mkm (Venus Saturn distance) = π x 170 mkm (Mercury Mars Distance) x 2.48
2815 mkm (Mercury Uranus distance) = π x 360 mkm (Mercury orb. Circumference) x 2.48
2764 mkm (Venus Uranus distance) = 2 x 550.7 (Jupiter Mars distance) x 2.48(1%)
4267 mkm (Mars Neptune distance) = π x 550.7 (Jupiter Mars distance) x 2.48
3030 mkm (Uranus Pluto distance) = 1205 (Mars Saturn distance) x 2.48 (1.4%)
5127 mkm (Jupiter Pluto distance) = π x 655 (Jupiter Saturn distance) x 2.48
5678 mkm (Mars Pluto distance) = π x 720.7 (Mercury Jupiter distance) x 2.48 (1%)
654.9 mkm (Jupiter Saturn distance) = 84 mkm (Mars Original Point) x 2.48 (1%)
Notice
The used distances more than 60% of all distances in the solar system.
(2) Diameters
12104 km (Venus diameter) = 4879 km (Mercury Diameter) x 2.48
2 x 49528 km (Neptune diameter) = 40080 km (Earth Circumference) x 2.48
120536 km (Saturn diameter) = 49528 km (Neptune diameter) x2.48 (2%)
142984 km (Jupiter diameter) = 57655 km x 2.48
(3) Periods
10747 days (Saturn orbital period) =4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) x 2.48
59800 days (Neptune orbital period) = 2 x 12057 x 2.48
(4) Degrees

I do this research
2nd
38
17.4 degrees = 7 degrees (Mercury orbital inclination) x 2.48
97.8 degrees (Uranus Axial Tilt) = 39.4 degrees x 2.48
174 degrees (Venus Data) = 28.3 deg Neptune axial tilt x (2.48)2
25.2 degrees (Mars Axial Tilt) = 2 x 5.1 deg (The moon orbital inclination) x 2.48
3.1degrees (Jupiter Axial Tilt) =1.25 degrees (1/Uranus orbital inclination) x 2.48
118.3 deg (=90 +28.3) = 2 x 23.8 deg x 2.48
23.4 deg = 9.42 x 2.48 But 9.42 = 2 x 1.9 deg x 2.48
26.7 (Saturn Axial Tilt) =10.76 x 2.48
Where
17.4 deg = The Inner Planets Orbital Inclinations Total
23.8 deg = The outer Planets Orbital Inclinations Total (23.6 deg) (error 1%)
39.4 = 4π2
1.9 deg = Mars Orbital Inclination.

I do this research
2nd
39
II – Discussion
- The Distances Data
- The solar system has 55 distances contains the solar planets orbital distances and
their internal distances. The data provided are 28 distances of this total which
equal more than (50%) of the solar system all distances.
- The data contradicts Newton theory in 2 basic points.
- (1st
Point) The data shows that no planet motion be independent because the
planets orbital and internal distances be created in some network form- we don't
deal here with separated distances, on the contrary- we deal with one network of
distances. The distances be created together based on one geometrical design
regardless the gravitation equation. Clearly Newton is mistaken
- (2nd
Point) The distances be rated with (2.48) where Saturn orbital inclination =2.5
degrees. The data shows that they are created to be in harmony with Saturn
motion. We here don't deal with equal planets in their motions. but we deal with a
geometrical design depends on main points. And this geometrical design depends
on Saturn motion and the data be created in harmony with Saturn motion data.
- I want to say
- We have another vision contradicts Newton theory of the sun mass gravity,
Newton is wrong, but, to prove this fact we have a hard task.
- The first observation is that, The solar system geometrical design is different from
what Newton tells because of 2 reasons, (1st
reason) is, The planet motion
Independency concept refutation and the (2nd
reason) is, the solar system design be
created for Saturn motion.
- Means,
- No planet motion be done independently and the planets motions be done to be in
proportionality with Saturn motion. that means, not only the planets motions be
done depending one another but also this dependency has a direction. It's directed
toward Saturn! why? The other data is found to support this same meaning –

I do this research
2nd
40
- The Continuum Effect
- The continuum effect is a clear meaning we can realize that from the data. the rate
(2.48) is used between 50% of all distances in the solar system, that shows the
meaning clearly
- The dependency meaning is understandable but why the rate (2.48) be used along
very many distances? Why not different rates be used? That because the reason
which creates this rate (2.48) continuous through the solar planets motions. the
meaning is something very interesting – it's the continuum – let's use an example
to explain this meaning…..
- In ancient time there was an illness called (Leprosy), it's very interesting illness
because it infects the human, and the cloths and also the buildings!!
- How can that be possible? I don't know,
- But it's one illness and infects different forms of matters…(I think the cancer is
similar because some glass also may suffer of cancer!)
- It's the continuum effect meaning
- The reason which creates the rate (2.48) effects on (50% of all distances in the
solar system) and no force prevents its effect, still this reason has more power to
effect on some planets orbital periods, diameters, axial tilts and orbital inclinations.
- Why do I suppose the matter be created out of light?
- The light creates the matter and space
- Simply this is the fact,
- The light can creates this continuum effect through matter different data. the light
can use the distances as periods of time and vice versa
- I suppose the matter and space are created out of light simply because the matter
motion features can be created only by light motion.
- The Continuum Effect is one real force against Newton theory of the sun mass
gravity – and we can simply say that Newton is mistaken because of The Solar
System Continuum Effect Of Data.

I do this research
2nd
41
- I hope to show how this argument is powerful and able to disprove Newton theory
and to do that let's refer to some other data….
- In our study we have seen more rates as (1.0725) and (4.61) and (31)
- The rate (1.0725) be used as a rate between 40% of all distances in the solar
system, a list for these distances be provided in appendix no. (1) of this current
paper
- And also the rate (4.61) be used as a rate between around 50% of all distances of
the solar system, and this rate we discuss deeply in point no. (7-10) with the rate of
time between Pluto and the moon motions.
- I try to show that, the using of rates between huge number of distances (or other
data) is a usual using of data in the solar system – this feature can be created only
if the data be created by a continuum effect- let's to explain the meaning in more
clear words in following
- If the planets motions be independent, no any rate can b used among huge number
of distances as we see – this using of the rates means we deal with planets move
depending on one another – and
- If this dependency is local – means- each planet depends on another planet but
without a series of dependency – the rate (2.48) will not be continuous so long –
but will be so limited in using -
- The rates continuous using tells that we deal with some textile. It's a network
designed basically for a purpose and moves from a point to another point trying to
create one trajectory of energy which we see as a rate be used between huge
number of distances (or other data).
- The Continuum Is A Light Motion Feature. By that, sometimes the continuous
effect has to be cut. In Fact the continuum isn't cut but it's hidden behind some data
not understandable by us. let's use one example
- 142984 km (Jupiter diameter) = 2.48 x 57655 km
- Now what's this value (57655 km)?? it's very near to 57960 seconds (error 0.5%)

I do this research
2nd
42
- Where
- 57960 seconds be = 16.1 hours = Neptune Day Period
- If 1 km = 1 second we may find the meaning behind this data!
- But
- What's the fact really? the fact is that
- 4 Jupiter days periods = 39.6 hours = 142560 seconds
- That means,
- Jupiter diameter be =142984 km because it expresses for 4 Jupiter days periods,
- Where (142984 /142560) =(361/360)
- And
- The previous data shows there's a proportionality with Neptune day period – that's
found because Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = 466884 km =
Neptune motion distance during a solar day.
- The difficulty was that to prove the relationship between Jupiter diameter 142984
km and Jupiter 4 days periods (142560 seconds) which is a very far meaning to us
and by that the continuum effect be hidden behind the un-understood data but not
be cut.
- The simple question should be why Jupiter diameter be in proportionality with 4
Jupiter days (specifically)? Why 4 days??
- My basic fight point is to prove The Continuum Effect
- The Discussion Conclusions
- There are 2 basic reasons disproving Newton theory of the sun gravity
- (1st
Reason) The solar planets motions data be transported among the planets
- (2nd
Reason) The solar planets motions data be created in a continuum feature.

I do this research
2nd
43
4-2 Saturn Motion Analysis
I- Data
(1)
(27.78/9.7) = (2x 9.7/6.8) = (2x6.8/4.7)= (2 x35/24.6)= (2 x24.6/17.2) = 1.16mkm
/0.406 mkm = (0.3 mkm /104895 km)
(2)
(35/6.8) = (24.1/4.7) = (27.78/5.4) = 5.14
(3)
1.16 mkm/ 13.1 km = 602208 km /6.8 =416232 km /4.7
(4)
24.1+25.2 = 24.6 + 24.7
(5)
300000 = 27.78 x 10800 = 13.1 x 22901 = 47.4 x 6330 = 9.7 x 30928
(6)
(1163352 /29.8) = (378675 /9.7) = (300000π / 24.1) = (210816/5.4) = (2x
470416/24.1)
(7)
(373644 /9.7) = (2 x 90560/4.7) = (2 x 464166 /24.1)
(8)
2 x 466884 = π x 297228 (1%)

I do this research
2nd
44
(9)
119590 x (9.7)2
=24.1 x 466884
(10)
(1.16 mkm /9.7 km) =119590 = 2x 2.48 ((10747 x 24)/10.7)
(11)
(1.16 mkm /35 km) = 33182= (10747 x 9.7)/ π
(12)
(24.6/17.2) = (9.72/6.8) but (9.72/9.7) =(361/360)
(13)
(142984/90560) =(4495.1/2872.5) = π/2
(14)
10747 x 24 h = 24.6 h x 10500
But
10500 x 9.9 h = 4331 days x 24
(15)
9.7 km/s x 2 x 155597 seconds = 8 x 378675 km

I do this research
2nd
45
II- Discussion
Equation no. (1)
(27.78/9.7) = (2x 9.7/6.8) = (2x6.8/4.7)= (2 x35/24.6)= (2 x24.6/17.2) = 1.16 mkm
/0.406 mkm = (0.3 mkm /104895 km)
- Where
- 27.78 km /s = The Moon Velocity
- 9.7 km /s = Saturn Velocity
- 6.8 km /s = Uranus Velocity
- 4.7 km /s = Pluto Velocity
- 35 km /s = Venus Velocity
- 24.6 hours = Mars Rotation Period
- 17.2 hours = Uranus Day Period
- 0.406 mkm = Pluto motion distance during a solar day
- 0.3 mkm = light known velocity (0.3 mkm/s)
- 1.16 mkm = Jupiter motion distance during 24.6 hours
(There's a light beam its velocity supposed to be 1.16 mkm/s)
- I have tried to write equation no. (1) to be in the best form but it still doesn't tell
the fact clearly – let's move with its step by step
- (1st
Point)
- We see 4 planets velocities are rated one another which are (the Earth moon,
Saturn, Uranus and Pluto), these 4 planets velocities are rated with one another –
we need to know why?
- But
- The equation doesn't tell the facts clearly – the fact is that:
- During Uranus day period (17.2 h) Saturn moves 600000 km

I do this research
2nd
46
- And
- During Mars rotation period (24.6 h) Uranus moves 600000 km
- And
- During 2 x 12430 seconds Mars moves 600000 km
- And
- During 35.5 hours Pluto moves 600000 km
- This fact has many points to notice
- First, the distances are equal
- Second, the distance 600000 km = light motion distance for 2 seconds
- Third, the periods are defined by the 4 planets and no information are needed!
- Based on that, Saturn motion uses Uranus day period and Uranus motion uses
Mars rotation period and Mars motion uses the period 12430 sec (this period is
defined by Saturn motion because during 12430 seconds Saturn moves a distance
= 120536 = Saturn diameter), and Pluto uses (35.5 hours) (And this period = 2
Uranus Days periods with error 3%)
- (Notice Venus needs 35.8 days to pass a distance = Venus orbital distance) (error
1%) ( if 1 hour be = 1 day that makes the 2 periods are equal)
- I want to say
- The 4 planets move equal distances in periods defined by themselves and no data
is needed and the equal distance = light motion distance for 2 second….
- No pure coincidence here be found – we have some very complex geometrical
machine – but how this data be created?
- Because all distances = light motion we can consider the light motion be a basic
player behind – but how?
- The first question we have left as (Why The Velocities Are Rated?)

I do this research
2nd
47
- (2nd
Point)
- The second point is the number (2) in the equation
- We see clearly that, this number is used for the moon velocity where the other
planets velocities can be rated simply without this (2) but the moon forces all
planets to use this (2) to create a general harmony for the equation
- The moon has this power because of the rate (1.16 mkm/0.406 mkm), where this
part of equation doesn't use the number (2), because of that, all planets have to use
the number (2) even if the moon velocity be not found
- We need to notice that the rate (1.16 mkm/0.406 mkm) = 2.86 controls many basic
data in the solar system – that makes this rate be so powerful – let's refer to some
of this data in following
- Additional Data
- The solar planets masses total x 2 = Jupiter mass x 2.86 (error 1.8%)
- The solar planets diameters total 406000 km = Jupiter diameter x 2.86 (0.7%)
- Jupiter diameter 142984 km = Neptune diameter 49528 km x 2.86 (1%)
- Mars diameter 6792 km = Pluto diameter 2390 km x 2.86
- 511.1 deg (all planets axial tilts total) = 180 x 2.86
- 278.4 deg (the outer planets axial tilts total) = 97.8 de (Uranus Axial Tilt) x 2.86
- 5.1 deg (the moon orbital inclination) = 1.8 deg (Neptune orbital inclination) x 2.86
-
- Many other basic data can be added to show the significance of this rate (2.86)
- What I'm trying to do is that, to prove the data be created based on a geometrical
system and trying to discover it – in fact – some great machine of geometry be
found behind but because many concepts be unknown we can't catch this machine
clearly as possible

I do this research
2nd
48
- (3rd
Point)
- (2 x 24.6 h/17.2 h) = (2.86)
- 24.6 hours =Mars Rotation Period
- 17.2 hours =Uranus Day Period
-
- This part of equation creates a proportionality between Mars rotation period (24.6
h) and Uranus day period (17.2 h),
- Why this proportionality is found? What's the relationship between Uranus and
Mars motions?. The data tells Uranus uses Saturn motion as a mediator to Mars
motion. Why Uranus motion should have a connection with Mars motion? what a
big deal behind?
- During Mars rotation period Jupiter moves 1.16 mkm and
- During Mars rotation period Uranus moves 2 x 300000 km
- Both Motions Are Light Motions Distances?
- Why Mars Rotation Period is important for many planets motions?
- My problem is that,
- I'm afraid to write more data to avoid the confusion but on the other side no
meaning can be concluded from the (short) data – let's look inside Uranus day
period
- 17.2 hours = 61920 seconds
- This powerful period how to understand? 61920 sec = 2 x 30589 s +742 sec
- 742 seconds = 1% of 61920 seconds
- Means
- Uranus orbital period 30589 days should be used in seconds units, then
- 2 x 30589 seconds = Uranus day period 61920 second with error (1%)
- Why?? But
- Light known velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) needs 4950 seconds to pass a distance = 1484
mkm = 2 x 742 mkm

I do this research
2nd
49
- If 1 second = 1 mkm that makes the distance 742 mkm be found in relationship
with 742 seconds – light motion be found behind Uranus motion to create Uranus
day period and orbital period in proportionality with one another based on light
motion.,
- Why this concussion is not an imaginary idea?! because
- Uranus needs 4900 solar days to move a distance =2872.5 mkm = Uranus orbital
distance – and we know that – 1 second of light motion = 1 day of planet motion.
- Now, this deep analysis doesn't tell why Uranus day period =17.2 hours, nor tells
why Uranus day period be in proportionality with Mars rotation period 24.6 hours?
- The data be created by unknown geometrical rules and we are watchers in some
Cinema –the nature creates its great tools and we don't understand what's happing
because of our less knowledge.
- Notice
- Uranus moves during 30589 hours a distance = 748.8 mkm wit error 1% with the
distance 742 mkm
- (4th
Point)
- The data forces for some modification let's see in following
- The distance 1200000 km
- Be passed by Mercury in a period =2 x 12658 seconds, and
- Be passed by Venus in a period = 9.52 hours, and
- Be passed by Earth in a period = 40269 seconds, and
- Be passed by The moon in a period = 43200 seconds, and
- Be passed by Mars in a period = 49793 seconds, and
- Be passed by Jupiter in a period = 91603 seconds, and
- Be passed by Saturn in a period = 2 x 61920 seconds, and
- Be passed by Uranus in a period = 2 x 24.6 hours, and
- Be passed by Neptune in a period =2 x 61.7 hours, and
- Be passed by Pluto in a period =71 hours

I do this research
2nd
50
- The period 40269 seconds be equal Earth circumference 40080 km (error 0.5%) if
1 km = 1 second– by that the distance be passed by Earth and the Earth
circumference be used as the period of time –
- The period 49793 seconds be equal Neptune diameter (49528 km) (error 0.5%) if 1
km = 1 sec. that shows why we need 1.2 mkm and not 600000 km because if we
use 600000 km mars will use a period =(24896 second) which can be equal
Neptune radius – but for diameter we need 1.2 mkm –
- That's happened with Earth circumference also – we need 1.2 mkm because we
can't divide Earth circumference into parts.
- The period 91603 seconds has an error (1%) with the period 90560 seconds (where
90560 days = Pluto orbital period)
- Here also we need the distance 1.2 mkm because Jupiter can't use part of Pluto
orbital period
- (Notice, we usually uses the periods in days, minutes or seconds. For example
Pluto moves during 90560 seconds a distance = 425632 km = Uranus motion
distance during its day period with error 1%)
- The motions of Saturn and Uranus use the periods in 2 cycles (2 Uranus days 17.2
hours) and (2 Mars rotation periods = 24.6 h), and it's possible to use the cycles in
any number but that the distance 1.2 mkm can create a general harmony of motion
for many planets.
- Notice
- The period Mercury needs to pass 1.2 mkm = 7 hours but
- 24 hours /7 hours =3.4 (can that have a relationship with Venus orbital inclination
3.4 degrees?)
- And
- The period Venus needs to pass 1.2 mkm = 9.52 hours but
- 24 hours /9.52 hours =2.55
- (The moon orbital inclination 5.1 degrees =2 x 2.55)

I do this research
2nd
51
Equation no. (2)
(35/6.8) = (24.1/4.7) = (27.78/5.4) = 5.14
- Where
- 35 km/s = Venus Velocity
- 6.8 km/s = Uranus Velocity
- 24.1 km/s = Mars Velocity
- 4.7 km/s = Pluto Velocity
- 27.78 km/s = The moon Velocity
- 5.4 km/s = Neptune Velocity
- Simply Equation no. (2) is produced from equation no. (1)
- Equation no. (2) shows that one force effects on the 6 planets and cause their
velocities to be rated with (5.14)
- But, again
- The equation can't tell the facts clearly, Let's try to do that in following
o Uranus moves during its day period (17.2 h) a distance = 421056 km
o Venus moves during 12104 seconds a distance = 423640 km
o Pluto moves during 90560 seconds a distance = 425632 km
o Neptune moves during 155597 seconds a distance =2x 420111 km
o The moon moves during 15328 seconds a distance = 425807 km
o Mars moves during 17660 seconds a distance = 425632 km
o The max error among these distances be 1%
o Where
o 12104 km = Venus Diameter
o 155597km = Neptune Circumference
o 90560 days = Pluto Orbital Period
o 15328 km = Mercury Circumference
o 17660 km x8= 141555 km (Jupiter diameter error 1%)
- Shortly

I do this research
2nd
52
- All planets move equal distances to Uranus motion distance during its day period
by using their own data except the moon uses Mercury circumference as a period
of time and Mars uses (1/8) of Jupiter diameter as a period of time
- The point is that the distance 17660 km is the basic distance in Planet 8 Days
Cycle
- The data may tell, that Mars should have a relationship with Planet 8 days cycle
- I want to say
- The simple form of the equation tells nothing about its deep fact – let's try to
deepen this discussion as possible in following
Equation no. (2) (continued)
(35/6.8) = (24.1/4.7) = (27.78/5.4) = 5.14
- This simple form of Equation no. (2) tells noting about the facts because not only
the planets velocities are rated but also the periods of time are rated and the planets
diameters and circumferences be used as periods of time in proportionality to pass
the required distance –
- Again
- We are invited to this happy party, but we get nothing of it! we don't listen any
beautiful song and not watch any interesting film, we don't listen any told joke for
laughing – we are invited visitors but we stand behind the glass wall looking but
understand nothing! Why
- Because we don't know by what geometrical rules this data be created and why.
- Why the planets have to move equal distances? What the big benefit if the planets
do? Why the planets use different sources of data? some planets use their
diameters or circumferences as periods of time others use their orbital periods by
change the units from one day into one second – the whole machine works before
our eyes and the data move from point to another point along the discussion but we
understand and learn nothing because we don't know neither the geometrical rules

I do this research
2nd
53
based on which the machine works nor the geometrical design by which the
machine be designed– then simply one question can expose our weak situation –
Let's ask, Why does the planet move if there's no sun gravity? Or what positive
result be produced by the planet motion?
- Notice
- 8 days of Uranus days periods =137.6 hours
- 137.6 hours = 24.6 hours (Mar rotation period) x 5.6
- What's 5.6??
- 5.1 degrees = The Moon Orbital Inclination
- 0.5 degrees = The moon angular diameter
- 5.6 degrees = the moon orbital inclination be measure above the moon body
- Also
- 137.6 hours = 8.51 x 16.1 hours (Neptune Day Period)
- 1 hour of Saturn motion = 8.51 hours of Pluto motion
- 16.1 hours of Saturn motion = 137.6 hours of Pluto motion
- That means
- 1 Neptune day period (16.1 h) can produce 8 Uranus days period (137.6 h) by
using the rate of time between Saturn an Pluto (8.51) but how? by what
geometrical rule that can be done?

I do this research
2nd
54
Equation no. (3)
1.16 mkm/ 13.1 km = 602208 km /6.8 km=416232 km /4.7 km
- Equation no. (3) tells
- Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during Mars rotation period (24.6 hours) a distance =
1.16 mkm
- And
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during Mars rotation period (24.6 hours) a distance = 2 x
300000 km
- And
- Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during Mars rotation period (24.6 hours) a distance =
416232 km
- But
- Sin (12.19 deg) x 416232 km = 88000 km (The moon daily displacement)
- The angle 12.19 degrees = 13.177 deg – 0.98562 deg
- 13.177 deg = The moon motion degrees per a solar day
- 0.9856 deg = The Earth motion degrees per a solar day
- Means, the distance 416232 km is related to the moon daily displacement – We
know that Pluto motion has some effect on The moon daily displacement but why
Mars rotation period is so effective??
- Notice
- 49528 km (Neptune diameter) x π2
=488822 km = 5.4 km/s x 90522 sec.
- But
- (488822 km = 466884 km + 2 x 10921 km the moon circumference)
- 90560 days = Pluto Orbital Period
- Notice
- 27.78 km/s (the moon velocity) x 4331 sec = 120316 km (but 120536km = Saturn
diameter) where 4331 days = Jupiter orbital period

I do this research
2nd
55
Equation no. (4)
24.1+25.2 = 24.6 + 24.7 = 49.3
- Where
- 25.2 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt
- 24.6 hours = Mars Rotation Period
- 24.7 hours = Mars Day Period
-
- I don't know how this equation can work!
- Just it's accurate equation, the numbers work accurately but the units cause a great
confusion
- It's Mars own data
- The simple conclusion is that, the planet data be created of periods of time –
means- the building unit is a period of time –
- No mass and no distance – the universe building unit is a period of time – that
makes all data be created from the same kitchen – and any data can be replaced in
place of any other data – the exchange be found simply because all components are
periods of time – whatsoever we see – all things are periods of time –
- For better explanation
- Imagine we see some distance, or we have some matter with mass, or we have 3
angles of triangle…etc all these components are (periods of time)
- It's the universe secret
- And
- What's our task now?
- We have to find the player-For Whom All Components Can Be Periods Of
Time? What's the player which can see (every thing) as periods of time?
- A Conclusion (The Universe Building Unit Is A Period Of Time)

I do this research
2nd
56
Equation no. (5)
300000 = 27.78 x 10800 = 13.1 x 22901 = 47.4 x 6330
- Where
- 300000 km/s = Light Velocity
- 27.78 km /s = The Moon Velocity
- 13.1 km /s = Saturn Velocity
- 47.4 km = Mercury Velocity
- 10800 sec = (1/8) x 86400 seconds
- 10921 km = The moon circumference (error 1%)
- 142984 km = Jupiter diameter = 22901 km x 2π (error 0.6%)
- 6330 sec = where Earth radius =6378 km (error 0.7%)
- The Equation shows an important observation that,
- The moon and Jupiter diameters be created equal to their rates between light
velocity (0.3 mkm/s) and their velocities (27.78 km/s and 13.1 km/s)
- Mercury motion uses (6330 sec) which be related to (Earth radius) and we have
seen that the moon uses Mercury circumference to pass the distance 425807 km
(=Uranus motion distance during its day period)
- Some deep relationship must be found between the moon and Mercury motions.
- But
- The question still has no answer
- The moon and Jupiter diameters be created as rates between light velocity and
their velocities – can that be a general rule? because no other planet use this same
rule just Mercury and defines another planet radius (Earth) and not its own
- So,
- Can a proportionality be found between planet diameter and its velocity?

I do this research
2nd
57
- More Data
- 300000 km = 47.4 km /s (Mercury velocity) x 6330 seconds
- 300000 km = 35 km /s (Venus velocity) x 8571 seconds
- 300000 km = 29.8 km /s (Earth velocity) x 10067 seconds
- 300000 km = 27.78 km /s (The Moon velocity) x 10800 seconds
- 300000 km = 24.1 km /s (Mars velocity) x 12430 seconds
- 300000 km = 13.1 km /s (Jupiter velocity) x 22901 seconds
- 300000 km = 9.7 km /s (Saturn velocity) x 30928 seconds
- 300000 km = 6.8 km /s (Uranus velocity) x 44117 seconds
- 300000 km = 5.4 km /s (Neptune velocity) x 55556 seconds
- 300000 km = 4.7 km /s (Pluto velocity) x 63830 seconds
- Notice
- ( 300000 km /5.4 km) =55556 = π2
(155597 km/27.78) (error 0.5%)
- Where (155597 km = Neptune Circumference)
- This notice tries to show that, Neptune circumference be used also as a rate
between light and Neptune velocities –The difficulty is
- While the moon and Jupiter diameters show direct dependency on the planets
velocities rates with light velocity, we expect this rule to be used for all planets-
this is usual thinking that any acceptable equation or rule should be used for all
planets data – also kepler laws prove this fact- my point of view contradicts this
idea – the point is that – the solar planets aren't similar planets to one another in all
data- because they are integrated with one another – that makes some data be
similar and others be different – for that reason not all equations be used by some
planets should be used by the others – we learn that from the nature – even in the
creatures creation – male and female have similar parts and different parts – the
point is that – the solar system is an integrated machine its parts are integrated with
one another – by that we need different parts to create this integration. Means the
rule is correct but not always be used by direct relationships

I do this research
2nd
58
Equation no. (6)
(1163352 /29.8) = (378675 /9.7) = (300000π / 24.1) = (210816/5.4) = (2x 470416/24.1) =
39040 AND (1160000/1163352) = (360/361)
- Where
- 29.8 km/s = Earth Velocity
- 9.7 km/s = Saturn Velocity
- 5.4 km/s = Neptune Velocity
- 300000 km/s = light velocity
- Mars moves during 12430 sec (=39040 /π) a distance = 300000 km = light motion
distance during 1 second. based on that, Mars moves during 39040 seconds a
distance = 300000 km x π
- Earth moves during 39040 seconds a distance = 1163352 km
- Saturn moves during 39040 seconds a distance = 378675 km = Saturn
Circumference
- 155597 sec x 9.7 km/s = 4 x 378675 km (error 0.35%)
- Notice
- 155597 km (Neptune Circumference) = 4 x 38899 km
- We use the period (39040 seconds) frequently, so if 1 km = 1 sec, So
- 38899 km be =39040 sec (error 0.4%)
- That means,
- The period (39040 seconds) which we have used frequently is found based on
Neptune Circumference -
- As a result
- 2 x 155597 km (Neptune circumference) = 311193.6 km
- 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 311193.6 seconds = 25 seconds x 0.3 mkm/sec
- (Mars axial tilt =25.2 degrees)

I do this research
2nd
59
- Notice
- Neptune moves during Neptune day period (16.1 h) a distance = 2 Neptune
Circumference
- Notice
- (1160000/1163352) = (360/361)
- Light velocity 1.16 mkm/s is rated to earth motion distance 1.163352 mkm by the
rate (361/360)
- Because
- The moon orbit regresses 19 degrees per year and during 19 years the total be 361
degrees, by that all data be configured based on this rate (361/360) showing the
moon orbit effect on the solar system motion data.

I do this research
2nd
60
Equation no. (7)
(373644 /9.7) = (2 x 90560/4.7) = (2 x 464166 /24.1)
- Where
- 9.7 km/sec = Saturn velocity
- 4.7 km/sec = Pluto velocity
- 24.1 km/sec = Mars velocity
- 373644km = The distance be passed by Saturn during its day period (10.7 h)
(Saturn day period 10.7 h = 38520 seconds)
- 90560 days =Pluto orbital period – in data it's used as a distance = 90560 km –
- The equation tells that Pluto moves a distance = (2x 90560 km) during the period
38520 seconds = 10.7 hours = (Saturn day period)
- 464166 km = this distance is very near to the distance (466884 km) (error 0.6%)
- The equation tells that, Mars moves during (10.7 hours) (Saturn day period) a
distance = 2 x 466884 km (error 0.6%)
- We know that, Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = 466884 km =
Neptune motion distance during a solar day
- I wish the data analysis does its task and causes to get the respectful readers
attention-because
- It's some very interesting feature that the data be so limited and we discover that
each planet uses the same data which be used by the other planets – even if the
geometrical explanation be still far to be discussed but the data disproves the
independent motions or random creation
- In fact the words can't tell the facts
- It's incredible to find the numbers are so limited and simply the same numbers be
used for all planets motions – where what's used as distances for one planet be
used again as periods for another one – and by that we discover at end Saturn
depends on the period 39040 sec to move a distance = its circumference where this

I do this research
2nd
61
period 39040 sec be = (25% of Neptune Circumference and each 1 km be = 1
second!)
- Notice
- During 10.7 hours (38520 seconds) (Saturn Day Period)
o Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves distance = 1825848 km
o Venus (35 km/s) moves distance = 1348200 km
o Earth (29.8 km/s) moves distance = 1147896 km
o The Moon (27.78 km/s) moves distance= 1070086 km
o Mars (24.1 km/s) moves distance = 928332 km = 2 x 464166 km
o Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves distance = 504612 km
o Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves distance = 373644 km
o Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves distance = 261936 km
o Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves distance = 208008 km
o Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves distance =181044 km =2 x 90522 km
- We notice that,
- Earth moves during (38520 seconds) a distance = 1147896 km but Jupiter moves
during a solar day a distance =1131840 km (error 1.4%)
- Can These 2 Distances Be Equal? if we neglect the error (1.4%) and consider the
2 distances be equal, why they are equal??
- We notice also that
- Uranus moves during (38520 sec) a distance = 261936 km =the distance Mars
moves in 10921 seconds (error 0.5%) (where 10921km = the moon circumference)
- I try to show that
- We don't deal with independent points may some connections connect them by
chance – but we deal with one body- each part is connected with the other parts by
several connections – that means- any planet data analysis will show another
planet data behind it! but why Uranus and Mars here?

How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii)

How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii)

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii)

Similar to How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii) (20)

More from Gerges francis

More from Gerges francis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii)