Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
- Where
- Planet Motion Features Prove Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- Many new features are discovered in the solar planets motions among which:
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
- The previous features disprove Planet Motion Independency Concept inherited by Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity- the features simply gives us a different vision about the solar system motion.
- Instead of the rigid body moving by the sun mass gravity independently from other rigid bodies in creation and motion data, The Solar Planet be a similar to a point on one trajectory of energy. where the solar planets move together one unified motion as train carriages transporting among the planets the motion with the rates of time making the solar system as a great Clock its input one motion creates (one second) and its output another motion creates (one solar day).
- And the 2 motions depend on one another as 2 gears in one machine of gears.
- Can this vision be a fact?
- I claim Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is created out of imagination basically because the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
- How can I prove my idea against Newton theory?
- By Planets Motions Data Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions rates of time be defined by using ONE RULE
- Based on the planets motions rates of time, the planets orbital periods and distances be defined. means,
- Based on this One Rule, the solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined.
- If the solar planets motions be independent from one another, how their orbital periods and distances be defined based on one rule only?
- The paper provides a proof that, the planets motions use different rates of time which proves that, the solar planets move one unified general motion. means,
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another and created one unified general motion, because of that, the planets motions need to use different rates of time to enable their motions to be integrated into one unified general motion.
- This fact changes the solar system description inherited from Newton theory of the sun mass gravity. The solar planets be similar to carriages in one train move together one unified motion. also the solar group can be similar to a mechanical clock, and the planets be similar to the gears of this clock. Each gear does one motion (and creates one rate of time) and these motions be integrated into one unified gnarl motion (and the rates of time be integrated into one unified general rate of time)
Paper objectives
- The paper provides the rule based on which all solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined, and test all planets motions data to prove that, no planet motion contradicts this rule.
- The paper tries to answer the question (why the solar planets use different rates of time) by providing The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory.
- The paper is divided into 2 parts.
- (1st Part) Provides the rule and its proves discussion
- (2nd Part) Provides The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Arguments
- The paper provides 2 basic arguments
- (1st Argument)
- The Paper disproves Newton Theory of The sun mass gravity and proves that the solar planets motions can't be independent motions from one another but each planet motion depends on other planets motions.
- This discussion concludes that, the solar system distances be created in a network form, integrated together in one geometrical design.
- The argument conclusion is (The solar planet move one unified general motion)
- The 1st Argument Depends On (Jupiter Motion Analysis)
- (2nd Argument)
- The Paper claims that the solar planets motions be accompanying with a light beam motion which provides the required energy for the planets and their distances creation (because matter is created of energy and space is created of energy)
- The light motion accompanying with the solar planets motions cause the planets to move one unified general motion.
- The 2nd Argument Depends On (Mercury Motion Analysis)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.3) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun is created after all solar planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun mass gravity decisively
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The paper analyzes the solar planet motion and compares it with Newton theory..
- Many new features be discovered and attributed to the planet motion and these features disprove also Newton theory in addition to the sun age theory.
1. Let's provide a list of these new discovered features in following:
2. The Solar planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion - By that the planets motions be similar to a machine of gears.
3. The Solar planets revolutions around the sun be done in equal periods of time
4. The Solar planets motions use different rates of time - by that the solar planets motions be similar to a great mechanical clock.
5. The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form. By that the solar system distances be similar to a chess board, each planet moves depending on the other planets motions and by using geometrical calculations
6. Mars and Pluto had migrated from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Paper hypothesis
Saturn moves by a velocity = 0.99 c (where c = 300000 km per second)
Saturn almost moves by light velocity, and this high velocity motion creates relativistic effects in the solar system data
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Again
- I claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021, because
- Saturn moves by light velocity, and
- No planet moves by the sun mass gravity, because, the matter is created out of light and moves with its parent light by using different rates of time. As a result, the solar planets motions use different rates of time, and by using these different rates of time, Saturn can travel by a velocity = 99% of light velocity (300000 km/s)
- Shortly
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken, and tenths of papers provided huge number of proves against this theory – now – the theory lived for 400 years spite its an imaginary idea and wrong in its principle - But
- The Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021 sees nothing of all that! they provide no help for any real progress in the solar system motion understudying. They save the wrong theory of Newton spite the planets data contradicts it frequently
- This paper provides one more feature of planets real motion disproving Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity – and providing a claim against the decision 2021–
- No one has the right to mislead the humanity to learn the lies in place of the real knowledge and facts. No one has the authority and no can face the responsibility of all human misleading and misguiding
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of TimeGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions using of different rates of time provides a basic progress in the solar system motion understanding, because
- The solar planets no longer be considered as rigid bodies move by the sun mass gravity effect, Instead
- The solar planets be similar to waterwheels built on one canal, they all rotate by the water motion.
- The matter is created out of light, but the born matter isn't separated from its parent light beam but moves with it by using different rates of time.
- Based on this vision.
- The solar planets and their distances be created out of one light beam, and the planets move one unified general motion in parallel to its parent light beam.
- This theory is proved
- The planets motions different rates of time prove that the planets move one unified general motion.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves the planets motions using of different rates of time. And use the theory to explains how the motions data of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn be created.
- The Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time Is A Feature Resulting By Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
- Because of that,
- The Planets Motions Different Rates Of Time Theory Depends On The Solar System Creation Theory.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) Gerges francis
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter and mercury motions analysis (revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions rates of time be defined by using ONE RULE
- Based on the planets motions rates of time, the planets orbital periods and distances be defined. means,
- Based on this One Rule, the solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined.
- If the solar planets motions be independent from one another, how their orbital periods and distances be defined based on one rule only?
- The paper provides a proof that, the planets motions use different rates of time which proves that, the solar planets move one unified general motion. means,
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another and created one unified general motion, because of that, the planets motions need to use different rates of time to enable their motions to be integrated into one unified general motion.
- This fact changes the solar system description inherited from Newton theory of the sun mass gravity. The solar planets be similar to carriages in one train move together one unified motion. also the solar group can be similar to a mechanical clock, and the planets be similar to the gears of this clock. Each gear does one motion (and creates one rate of time) and these motions be integrated into one unified gnarl motion (and the rates of time be integrated into one unified general rate of time)
Paper objectives
- The paper provides the rule based on which all solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined, and test all planets motions data to prove that, no planet motion contradicts this rule.
- The paper tries to answer the question (why the solar planets use different rates of time) by providing The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory.
- The paper is divided into 2 parts.
- (1st Part) Provides the rule and its proves discussion
- (2nd Part) Provides The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Arguments
- The paper provides 2 basic arguments
- (1st Argument)
- The Paper disproves Newton Theory of The sun mass gravity and proves that the solar planets motions can't be independent motions from one another but each planet motion depends on other planets motions.
- This discussion concludes that, the solar system distances be created in a network form, integrated together in one geometrical design.
- The argument conclusion is (The solar planet move one unified general motion)
- The 1st Argument Depends On (Jupiter Motion Analysis)
- (2nd Argument)
- The Paper claims that the solar planets motions be accompanying with a light beam motion which provides the required energy for the planets and their distances creation (because matter is created of energy and space is created of energy)
- The light motion accompanying with the solar planets motions cause the planets to move one unified general motion.
- The 2nd Argument Depends On (Mercury Motion Analysis)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.3) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun is created after all solar planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun mass gravity decisively
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The paper analyzes the solar planet motion and compares it with Newton theory..
- Many new features be discovered and attributed to the planet motion and these features disprove also Newton theory in addition to the sun age theory.
1. Let's provide a list of these new discovered features in following:
2. The Solar planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion - By that the planets motions be similar to a machine of gears.
3. The Solar planets revolutions around the sun be done in equal periods of time
4. The Solar planets motions use different rates of time - by that the solar planets motions be similar to a great mechanical clock.
5. The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form. By that the solar system distances be similar to a chess board, each planet moves depending on the other planets motions and by using geometrical calculations
6. Mars and Pluto had migrated from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Paper hypothesis
Saturn moves by a velocity = 0.99 c (where c = 300000 km per second)
Saturn almost moves by light velocity, and this high velocity motion creates relativistic effects in the solar system data
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Again
- I claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021, because
- Saturn moves by light velocity, and
- No planet moves by the sun mass gravity, because, the matter is created out of light and moves with its parent light by using different rates of time. As a result, the solar planets motions use different rates of time, and by using these different rates of time, Saturn can travel by a velocity = 99% of light velocity (300000 km/s)
- Shortly
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken, and tenths of papers provided huge number of proves against this theory – now – the theory lived for 400 years spite its an imaginary idea and wrong in its principle - But
- The Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021 sees nothing of all that! they provide no help for any real progress in the solar system motion understudying. They save the wrong theory of Newton spite the planets data contradicts it frequently
- This paper provides one more feature of planets real motion disproving Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity – and providing a claim against the decision 2021–
- No one has the right to mislead the humanity to learn the lies in place of the real knowledge and facts. No one has the authority and no can face the responsibility of all human misleading and misguiding
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of TimeGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions using of different rates of time provides a basic progress in the solar system motion understanding, because
- The solar planets no longer be considered as rigid bodies move by the sun mass gravity effect, Instead
- The solar planets be similar to waterwheels built on one canal, they all rotate by the water motion.
- The matter is created out of light, but the born matter isn't separated from its parent light beam but moves with it by using different rates of time.
- Based on this vision.
- The solar planets and their distances be created out of one light beam, and the planets move one unified general motion in parallel to its parent light beam.
- This theory is proved
- The planets motions different rates of time prove that the planets move one unified general motion.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves the planets motions using of different rates of time. And use the theory to explains how the motions data of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn be created.
- The Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time Is A Feature Resulting By Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
- Because of that,
- The Planets Motions Different Rates Of Time Theory Depends On The Solar System Creation Theory.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) Gerges francis
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter and mercury motions analysis (revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Neptune Motion Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance
- This fact tells, if Uranus and Earth velocities be equal, while Uranus revolves around the sun one complete revolution Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 complete revolutions (19.2 years) - But
- The Earth moon moves a cycle called Metonic Cycle extends for 19 years. this fact creates a puzzle because Earth Cycle is 4 years only (365+365+365+366 =1461 days) and by that the Earth itself doesn't know about Metonic Cycle –
- The question be (How does the moon move Metonic Cycle if Earth doesn't?)
- The answer is …
- Uranus motion effects on the moon motion and caused the moon to move Metonic Cycle (19 years) – Simply, Metonic Cycle is the result of Uranus Motion effect on the moon motion.
- Now, Why The Nobel Prize Decision For Physics 2021 Is Mistaken?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planet Motion Use Different Rates Of Time, Which Disproves (Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity)
- The Planets Motions Using Of Different Rates Of Time Prove (Light Motion Effect on Planet Motion)
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- 3 New Features Of The Solar Planet Motion Be Discovered Later Which Are:
- (1) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Be Integrated In One Unified Motion
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form.
- The solar planets motions data analysis proves that, the previous 3 features are facts and effect on the planets motions.
- The 3 features give us another vision about the solar system motion and disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Also they disprove the planet motion Independency Concept which is inherited from Newton Theory.
Paper Objective
(1) The paper discussion proves that, the 3 features are facts effect on the solar planets motions.
(2) The paper discussion disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planet Motion Independency Concept.
(3) The paper discussion shows, these 3 features effect on the planets motions as a result of Light Motion Effect On Planets Motions.
Paper Conclusions
- Matter And Space Are Created Out Of Light
- The Solar System Is Created Out Of One Light Beam.
Notice
- No Critic is provided against the mass gravity concept – the critic is against The sun mass gravity as a reason for the solar planets motion – because – the sun is created after the solar planets- and based on that – The solar planets be created and moving before the sun creation. Newton Theory Is Wrong.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar GroupGerges francis
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar Group?
Abstract
Paper Claim
- The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken!
Paper question Explanation
- The solar system is one machine and built on one geometrical design – Perfectly – the solar system is similar to a chess board. Not only the planets data be created based on geometrical measurements and calculations but also the solar system distances be created in a network form. That means, every point in the solar system is defined based on one geometrical design.
- The chess board is the best example for the solar system design. If we accept this idea – 2 results will be produced
- (1st Result)
- The Refutation For Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity. That's why Nobel Prize Decision 2021 is mistaken. Because
- Newton theory gives clear meaning that, each planet moves independently and no geometrical design be found before the solar system creation. Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is built on the big bang hypothesis tells (the universe be created by some random process) – this is the basic point against Newton – because he told wrong theory and pushed us to think in the wrong direction of thinking.
- Shortly
- There was a design found before the solar system creation and the planets and distances data be created according to this design. That shows Newton theory is so far from the truth.
- Nobel Prize decision for physics 2021 has to create the revolution against Newton theory and description. Where no real progress in the solar system motion understanding during centuries be done because of it. and even the big bang theory be refuted as a proof that we do no progress- that creates the responsibility on the decision makers shoulders and they should face the history evaluation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found, (newton is wrong)Gerges francis
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found (Newton is Wrong)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
Paper hypothesis proves
Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Is Wrong Because
(1) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Transported Among The Planets
(2) The Solar Planets Motions Data Shows A Continuum Effect Through The Planets Motions
(3) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
(4) The Solar System Distances Be Created In One Network Form
(5) The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion.
(The sun is the planets motions result and not the reason)
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is a wrong theory. And we should remove it from the physics book. The previous proves are discussed in the paper. And they are decisive proves against the theory.
- Of course if the sun be created after all planets creation Newton theory be refuted clearly. But the historical records difficulties will prevent such proof by all means. For that reason we can't depend on this very good proof in our fighting against Newton theory.
- But
- We still have one more decisive proof against Newton which can kill this theory clearly and remove it at end from the physics book. This proof is the continuum effect of the solar planets motions data.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The sun obliquity disproves newton theory of the sun mass gravityGerges francis
The Sun Obliquity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun obliquity on ecliptic (7.25 degrees) proves that, Earth Is Found Before The Sun Creation.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The paper hypothesis tries to disprove Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- While Newton told us, The Sun Is The Planet Motion Reason, the paper hypothesis tells, Earth is found and moving before the sun creation. as a result, we conclude that, Earth Motion Doesn't Depend On The Sun.
- This conclusion be valid for all solar planets. Means, Newton Theory of The sun mass Gravity is mistaken.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Description
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Create One Unified General Motion.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The Solar Planets Motions Can be Similar to The Train Carriages Motions
- Or
- The Solar Planets Motions Can be Similar to The Chess Pieces Motions.
- Each Planet motion be defined to be complementary with other planets motions.
- The complementary motions be integrated one another and create One Unified General Motion.
- The Planets Motions General harmony is produced by the unified general motion.
- Each Planet motion can be considered as an obligatory motion defined for this planet by The Planets Unified General Motion.
- Each Planet Data be created in consistency with its motion. and because the planet motion be defined obligatory, Each planet data be defined as a result.
- The solar planets data be created complementary with each other because their motions be complementary with each other. that means no planet data can be created independently from the other planets data.
- Based on this vision
- The solar planets data be created based on One Geometrical Design
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Abstract
Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Paper question Explanation
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance 84 mkm but Pluto was the mercury moon revolves round it.
- There was one more planet found at a distance 71 mkm from the sun.
- Mars was collided with this planet and destroyed it. as a result
- Mars and Pluto were migrated from their original orbital distances.
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to its current position (227.9 mkm) and through its displacement, Mars had collided with Venus and Earth and caused the Earth moon creation. based on this story, Mars itself had collided with Earth and caused the moon creation (not the ancient plant theia)
- The planets migration were done before the sun creation and caused serious negative effect on the solar system. that explains how Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken where the sun is created after all planets creations and motions. so how the sun can be the planets motions reason?
- How can I know this data?
- By Using The Planets Motions Data Analysis.
- The solar system is created as one machine, and the planets and their distances be distributed geometrically in a network form. by that the planets migration caused registered changes in the solar planets motions data.
- Again
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
- Because
- While Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken clearly, and contradicts the planets motions data. and while Newton theory which is lived since 400 years prevented any real progress in the solar system understanding, and while tenths of papers be written against Newton theory and its negative effects on the solar system general understanding.
- And while, tenths of papers and thousands of pages be written with hundreds of questions and contradictions against the negative effect of Newton theory...
- The Nobel Prize Decision 2021 sees nothing of that. We are again be under Newton theory umbrella. No logic they have in their decision but by force they forced to remove the correction in the physics book. And then for one more year the physics teachers over Earth will teach the lies of Newton and every student have to learn!
- The Decision Is Mistaken
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) (Revised) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Distances Network Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
The hypothesis explanation
- The paper hypothesis tells that,
- The solar system be created by energy provided by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
- The light motion velocity creates the solar planets matters and their distances
- The solar system distances creation be done by one light beam motion energy and caused the distances to be created in a network form
- That means,
- The solar system distances be created and distributed based on one geometrical design. Where no distance be created independent from the other distances
- Based on this vision
- The distances among the solar planets be similar to the railways but the planets be similar to the trains.
- As a result no planet can move freely in space, on the contrary, the planets move obligatory motions on their railways
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar System Geometrical Design depends on Mars and Pluto Motions
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The Solar Group is a machine of gears and each planet motion be used as a gear in it, the planets motions be integrated one another and create one unified motion.
- This vision tells, the solar system distances must be created as a network designed geometrically based on the planets positions and motions.
- The vision makes the solar group as a train and the planets as carriages in one train
- Accordingly, Planet motion can't be independent from the others'
- The dependency of motions among the planets depends on the planets motions periods, because each planet creates its own rate of time to perform the integration among the planets motions to create the planets unified general motion.
- Based on this vision, each planet position and motion data be defined in comparison with the other planets positions and data. As a result, the planets motions be similar to chess board pieces motions. each motion depends on the others and be calculated geometrically
- The vision disproves The Sun Mass Gravity Of Newton, and also Planet Motion Independency Concept which is inherited of Newton theory, because it tells the solar system moves by one geometrical design creates the planets data and motions.
- And
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury, and Pluto was the Mercury Moon.
- Some great strike caused Mars and Pluto to migrate from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
- By the planets migration, the solar system distances network be confused and needed a repair and by that, the solar system design takes Mars and Pluto as the basic 2 points to redesign the solar system distances Network
- The solar system design caused to create new 2 Planets (The moon and Saturn), to support the solar system redesign process.
Paper Objective
- The paper explains the solar system design, proving that Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken (this discussion be the paper part No. (II) under the title "The Solar System Creation Theory")
- The paper explains the changes be occurred by Mars and Pluto migration in the solar system design, proving the planets migration event (Part no. (I) of this paper under title (The Solar System Design Description)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii)Gerges francis
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found? (Newton is Wrong) (II)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planet Moves BY Light Motion
Paper hypothesis explanation
- The basic question in the solar system motion is (Do we understand the planets real positions?)
- Newton Theory tells Planet moves by the sun mass gravity force, can that be real? Of course not –Why? because
- The planets motions data show effects of Planets masses gravities on one another - for example – The moon be created by the Earth gravity –that shows an effect of Earth gravity on the moon creation and motion – based on that – Earth gravity effect be seen in the moon creation and motion data – on the other side – No any planet data refers to the sun gravity effect on it?
- Earth gravity is an example of Planets gravities effects on one another where the planets data show clearly that, But no planet data refers to any effect of the sun gravity on it! Why? What options we have to solve this dilemma?
- (a) Can we suppose that the sun mass is an imaginary one and not fact? Or
- (b) Can we suppose that the sun be in some position prevents its gravity effect on the planets motions? to make this question more clear let’s ask –
- Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance. Let's ask (Are the Sun, Saturn and Uranus be on one line with an angle 180 degrees or 90 degrees?) Can the planets positions create a distinguish in The Mass Gravity Using?
- But if no sun gravity be found why the planets revolve around the sun? we have discussed this question before(Part No. I)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper discuss if this fact supports the hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
3- The Moon Day Period Discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Pluto And The Moon Motions Are Effected By The Earth Motion.
The hypothesis Explanation
- I use the planets data analysis to discover the solar planets creation and motions.
- The planets data shows the following fact….
- Pluto Day Period be =153.3 hours because Pluto day period depends on The Earth moon day period (708.7h). That explains why Pluto day period is so long in comparison with the outer planets days periods. The fact is that, Pluto day period is created as a function in the Earth Moon Day Period.
- On the other side, the moon orbital apogee radius which should be = 413600 km became =406000 km because of Pluto motion effect on the moon orbital motion.
- Paper Objective
- Because no physics theory can give an explanation for such dependency found between 2 small masses planets which are at a huge distance between them, I have to prove this dependency between the 2 planets by all means. And as a result for these proves, we have to search after the method by which this dependency can be created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Depends On A Light Beam Motion Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar system motion depends on a light beam motion.
The hypothesis explanation
- There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec in the solar system
- The solar system is created out of this light beam energy. The light energy creates The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances
- Based on this vision
- The solar system motion depends on this light beam motion.
- As a result
- This light beam effects are seen frequently in the planets motions data. because the planet is similar to a puppet on the puppets theater, the light motion is the main player behind and by that the light moves by using planets motions data and the light motion effects on these planets motions data.
- The hypothesis tells another universe be found behind the universe of matter and the important news is that, the hidden universe causes the matter universe motion.
- By that, the solar planets don't move by the sun mass gravity. The solar planets are similar to ships found on a sea they move by this sea waves. Where the sea is the light motions, because of that the light motions define the planets motions range and creates their motions data.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves the light motion existence behind the planets motions and proves also that the light motion cause the planets motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter And Mercury Motions Analysis (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form And Based On One Geometrical Design.
- Means
- The distances be distributed based on geometrical design in comparison with other distances and no a single distance be created independent from the other distances
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Light Velocity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The solar group is created of energy provided by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The solar planets matters and their distances are created of energy provided by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
- The light velocity 1.16 mkm/s can be proved by The planets orbital and internal distances analysis where the distances are created and distributed based on a geometrical design depends on a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
- The light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity, because
- The sun light velocity (0.3 mkm/s) proves that, this light be produced as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/).
Paper conclusion
- The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion. which disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity Decisively.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The solar system distances network theory (revised 2)Gerges francis
The Solar System Distances Network Theory (Revised 2)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis.
- There's a light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/) moves in parallel to Mercury Motion.
Paper Hypotheses Explanation
- Planet Motion be a cover for a light motion found behind. The light motion uses Planet motion data for its own motion.
- The hypothesis creates one more universe in parallel to the universe of matter. And by that, The Planets be similar to ships sail over a sea. But the sea is light motions network.
- The hypothesis uses Mercury Motion as a examination point to prove that a motion of a light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/s) be behind Mercury Motion.
- The light motion causes to create the solar system distances in a network form and depends on one geometrical design. Because of that, the solar system distances analysis will prove the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created in a network form and depend on one geometrical design which proves that these distances be created by a motion of a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves The Light Supposed Velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) Existence.
- This proof disproves automatically Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- Because
- The sun rays velocity = 300000 km/sec.
- Where
- The solar system distances prove that they are created by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec.
- means,
- The sun light velocity (300000 km/) is created as a side product from the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s),
- means
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion
- Which disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)Gerges francis
Paper objective
The paper provides (1-50) questions and answers concerns the solar system motion analysis – The questions are:
1- Why do Venus and Uranus rotate on their axes, or spin, in a clockwise direction?
2- Does aether wind exist?
3- What are the major and most effective refutations of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity? Question Asked December 6, 2019.
4- Which is the most convincing physical experiment (Not Thought Experiment) that conclusively validates Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity?
5- The advance of Mercury perihelion is achieved in Newtonian gravity
6- Is Gravity a Push or a Pull?
7- Is our solar system exemplary for all other planetary systems?
8- Life on Mars: Open discussion
9- What do you think about wave-particle duality?
10- Is there somebody who believes in the theory of Everett (multitude of universes)? Do Einstein's Field Equations allow multiple universes?
11- Do the Gravitational force in between two objects depends on the most probable distance in between them?
12- What's underline the Lorentz transformation? And what's the dimension of the space?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
- The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
- The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
- Because
- The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
- Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Description (Revised)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Create One Unified General Motion.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells the planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- The hypothesis discovers One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, The Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
- Based on that, The Solar Planet Can't Change Its Motion.
- The Solar Planet creates its data to be in consistency with its motion.
- Because, the planet can't change its motion, but can change its data to be in consistency with its motion. and because of that, the planet data be created in consistency with its motion.
- Because the planet motion be complementary with other planets motions.
- The planet data be created complementary with other planets data
- Based On This Vision
- The solar planets data be created based on One Geometrical Design.
- And
- The Planets Creation And Motions Data Be Controlled By One Equation Only
- The paper hypothesis gives a different vision from the solar planets classical description. because its tells that, (The Solar Planet Data Be Created Based On Geometrical Calculations And Rules). The classical description tells planets data be created by random process and without geometrical reasons behind.
- The Planets Unified General Motion proves discussion shows that, the hypothesis tells the fact.
Paper Main Question
- Can The Planets Motions By Masses Gravity Forces Create The Planets Unified General Motion?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Neptune Motion Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance
- This fact tells, if Uranus and Earth velocities be equal, while Uranus revolves around the sun one complete revolution Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 complete revolutions (19.2 years) - But
- The Earth moon moves a cycle called Metonic Cycle extends for 19 years. this fact creates a puzzle because Earth Cycle is 4 years only (365+365+365+366 =1461 days) and by that the Earth itself doesn't know about Metonic Cycle –
- The question be (How does the moon move Metonic Cycle if Earth doesn't?)
- The answer is …
- Uranus motion effects on the moon motion and caused the moon to move Metonic Cycle (19 years) – Simply, Metonic Cycle is the result of Uranus Motion effect on the moon motion.
- Now, Why The Nobel Prize Decision For Physics 2021 Is Mistaken?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planet Motion Use Different Rates Of Time, Which Disproves (Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity)
- The Planets Motions Using Of Different Rates Of Time Prove (Light Motion Effect on Planet Motion)
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- 3 New Features Of The Solar Planet Motion Be Discovered Later Which Are:
- (1) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Be Integrated In One Unified Motion
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form.
- The solar planets motions data analysis proves that, the previous 3 features are facts and effect on the planets motions.
- The 3 features give us another vision about the solar system motion and disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Also they disprove the planet motion Independency Concept which is inherited from Newton Theory.
Paper Objective
(1) The paper discussion proves that, the 3 features are facts effect on the solar planets motions.
(2) The paper discussion disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planet Motion Independency Concept.
(3) The paper discussion shows, these 3 features effect on the planets motions as a result of Light Motion Effect On Planets Motions.
Paper Conclusions
- Matter And Space Are Created Out Of Light
- The Solar System Is Created Out Of One Light Beam.
Notice
- No Critic is provided against the mass gravity concept – the critic is against The sun mass gravity as a reason for the solar planets motion – because – the sun is created after the solar planets- and based on that – The solar planets be created and moving before the sun creation. Newton Theory Is Wrong.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar GroupGerges francis
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar Group?
Abstract
Paper Claim
- The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken!
Paper question Explanation
- The solar system is one machine and built on one geometrical design – Perfectly – the solar system is similar to a chess board. Not only the planets data be created based on geometrical measurements and calculations but also the solar system distances be created in a network form. That means, every point in the solar system is defined based on one geometrical design.
- The chess board is the best example for the solar system design. If we accept this idea – 2 results will be produced
- (1st Result)
- The Refutation For Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity. That's why Nobel Prize Decision 2021 is mistaken. Because
- Newton theory gives clear meaning that, each planet moves independently and no geometrical design be found before the solar system creation. Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is built on the big bang hypothesis tells (the universe be created by some random process) – this is the basic point against Newton – because he told wrong theory and pushed us to think in the wrong direction of thinking.
- Shortly
- There was a design found before the solar system creation and the planets and distances data be created according to this design. That shows Newton theory is so far from the truth.
- Nobel Prize decision for physics 2021 has to create the revolution against Newton theory and description. Where no real progress in the solar system motion understanding during centuries be done because of it. and even the big bang theory be refuted as a proof that we do no progress- that creates the responsibility on the decision makers shoulders and they should face the history evaluation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found, (newton is wrong)Gerges francis
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found (Newton is Wrong)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
Paper hypothesis proves
Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Is Wrong Because
(1) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Transported Among The Planets
(2) The Solar Planets Motions Data Shows A Continuum Effect Through The Planets Motions
(3) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
(4) The Solar System Distances Be Created In One Network Form
(5) The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion.
(The sun is the planets motions result and not the reason)
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is a wrong theory. And we should remove it from the physics book. The previous proves are discussed in the paper. And they are decisive proves against the theory.
- Of course if the sun be created after all planets creation Newton theory be refuted clearly. But the historical records difficulties will prevent such proof by all means. For that reason we can't depend on this very good proof in our fighting against Newton theory.
- But
- We still have one more decisive proof against Newton which can kill this theory clearly and remove it at end from the physics book. This proof is the continuum effect of the solar planets motions data.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The sun obliquity disproves newton theory of the sun mass gravityGerges francis
The Sun Obliquity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun obliquity on ecliptic (7.25 degrees) proves that, Earth Is Found Before The Sun Creation.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The paper hypothesis tries to disprove Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- While Newton told us, The Sun Is The Planet Motion Reason, the paper hypothesis tells, Earth is found and moving before the sun creation. as a result, we conclude that, Earth Motion Doesn't Depend On The Sun.
- This conclusion be valid for all solar planets. Means, Newton Theory of The sun mass Gravity is mistaken.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Description
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Create One Unified General Motion.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The Solar Planets Motions Can be Similar to The Train Carriages Motions
- Or
- The Solar Planets Motions Can be Similar to The Chess Pieces Motions.
- Each Planet motion be defined to be complementary with other planets motions.
- The complementary motions be integrated one another and create One Unified General Motion.
- The Planets Motions General harmony is produced by the unified general motion.
- Each Planet motion can be considered as an obligatory motion defined for this planet by The Planets Unified General Motion.
- Each Planet Data be created in consistency with its motion. and because the planet motion be defined obligatory, Each planet data be defined as a result.
- The solar planets data be created complementary with each other because their motions be complementary with each other. that means no planet data can be created independently from the other planets data.
- Based on this vision
- The solar planets data be created based on One Geometrical Design
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Abstract
Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Paper question Explanation
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance 84 mkm but Pluto was the mercury moon revolves round it.
- There was one more planet found at a distance 71 mkm from the sun.
- Mars was collided with this planet and destroyed it. as a result
- Mars and Pluto were migrated from their original orbital distances.
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to its current position (227.9 mkm) and through its displacement, Mars had collided with Venus and Earth and caused the Earth moon creation. based on this story, Mars itself had collided with Earth and caused the moon creation (not the ancient plant theia)
- The planets migration were done before the sun creation and caused serious negative effect on the solar system. that explains how Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken where the sun is created after all planets creations and motions. so how the sun can be the planets motions reason?
- How can I know this data?
- By Using The Planets Motions Data Analysis.
- The solar system is created as one machine, and the planets and their distances be distributed geometrically in a network form. by that the planets migration caused registered changes in the solar planets motions data.
- Again
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
- Because
- While Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken clearly, and contradicts the planets motions data. and while Newton theory which is lived since 400 years prevented any real progress in the solar system understanding, and while tenths of papers be written against Newton theory and its negative effects on the solar system general understanding.
- And while, tenths of papers and thousands of pages be written with hundreds of questions and contradictions against the negative effect of Newton theory...
- The Nobel Prize Decision 2021 sees nothing of that. We are again be under Newton theory umbrella. No logic they have in their decision but by force they forced to remove the correction in the physics book. And then for one more year the physics teachers over Earth will teach the lies of Newton and every student have to learn!
- The Decision Is Mistaken
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) (Revised) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Distances Network Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
The hypothesis explanation
- The paper hypothesis tells that,
- The solar system be created by energy provided by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
- The light motion velocity creates the solar planets matters and their distances
- The solar system distances creation be done by one light beam motion energy and caused the distances to be created in a network form
- That means,
- The solar system distances be created and distributed based on one geometrical design. Where no distance be created independent from the other distances
- Based on this vision
- The distances among the solar planets be similar to the railways but the planets be similar to the trains.
- As a result no planet can move freely in space, on the contrary, the planets move obligatory motions on their railways
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar System Geometrical Design depends on Mars and Pluto Motions
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The Solar Group is a machine of gears and each planet motion be used as a gear in it, the planets motions be integrated one another and create one unified motion.
- This vision tells, the solar system distances must be created as a network designed geometrically based on the planets positions and motions.
- The vision makes the solar group as a train and the planets as carriages in one train
- Accordingly, Planet motion can't be independent from the others'
- The dependency of motions among the planets depends on the planets motions periods, because each planet creates its own rate of time to perform the integration among the planets motions to create the planets unified general motion.
- Based on this vision, each planet position and motion data be defined in comparison with the other planets positions and data. As a result, the planets motions be similar to chess board pieces motions. each motion depends on the others and be calculated geometrically
- The vision disproves The Sun Mass Gravity Of Newton, and also Planet Motion Independency Concept which is inherited of Newton theory, because it tells the solar system moves by one geometrical design creates the planets data and motions.
- And
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury, and Pluto was the Mercury Moon.
- Some great strike caused Mars and Pluto to migrate from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
- By the planets migration, the solar system distances network be confused and needed a repair and by that, the solar system design takes Mars and Pluto as the basic 2 points to redesign the solar system distances Network
- The solar system design caused to create new 2 Planets (The moon and Saturn), to support the solar system redesign process.
Paper Objective
- The paper explains the solar system design, proving that Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken (this discussion be the paper part No. (II) under the title "The Solar System Creation Theory")
- The paper explains the changes be occurred by Mars and Pluto migration in the solar system design, proving the planets migration event (Part no. (I) of this paper under title (The Solar System Design Description)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii)Gerges francis
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found? (Newton is Wrong) (II)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planet Moves BY Light Motion
Paper hypothesis explanation
- The basic question in the solar system motion is (Do we understand the planets real positions?)
- Newton Theory tells Planet moves by the sun mass gravity force, can that be real? Of course not –Why? because
- The planets motions data show effects of Planets masses gravities on one another - for example – The moon be created by the Earth gravity –that shows an effect of Earth gravity on the moon creation and motion – based on that – Earth gravity effect be seen in the moon creation and motion data – on the other side – No any planet data refers to the sun gravity effect on it?
- Earth gravity is an example of Planets gravities effects on one another where the planets data show clearly that, But no planet data refers to any effect of the sun gravity on it! Why? What options we have to solve this dilemma?
- (a) Can we suppose that the sun mass is an imaginary one and not fact? Or
- (b) Can we suppose that the sun be in some position prevents its gravity effect on the planets motions? to make this question more clear let’s ask –
- Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance. Let's ask (Are the Sun, Saturn and Uranus be on one line with an angle 180 degrees or 90 degrees?) Can the planets positions create a distinguish in The Mass Gravity Using?
- But if no sun gravity be found why the planets revolve around the sun? we have discussed this question before(Part No. I)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper discuss if this fact supports the hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
3- The Moon Day Period Discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Pluto And The Moon Motions Are Effected By The Earth Motion.
The hypothesis Explanation
- I use the planets data analysis to discover the solar planets creation and motions.
- The planets data shows the following fact….
- Pluto Day Period be =153.3 hours because Pluto day period depends on The Earth moon day period (708.7h). That explains why Pluto day period is so long in comparison with the outer planets days periods. The fact is that, Pluto day period is created as a function in the Earth Moon Day Period.
- On the other side, the moon orbital apogee radius which should be = 413600 km became =406000 km because of Pluto motion effect on the moon orbital motion.
- Paper Objective
- Because no physics theory can give an explanation for such dependency found between 2 small masses planets which are at a huge distance between them, I have to prove this dependency between the 2 planets by all means. And as a result for these proves, we have to search after the method by which this dependency can be created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Depends On A Light Beam Motion Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar system motion depends on a light beam motion.
The hypothesis explanation
- There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec in the solar system
- The solar system is created out of this light beam energy. The light energy creates The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances
- Based on this vision
- The solar system motion depends on this light beam motion.
- As a result
- This light beam effects are seen frequently in the planets motions data. because the planet is similar to a puppet on the puppets theater, the light motion is the main player behind and by that the light moves by using planets motions data and the light motion effects on these planets motions data.
- The hypothesis tells another universe be found behind the universe of matter and the important news is that, the hidden universe causes the matter universe motion.
- By that, the solar planets don't move by the sun mass gravity. The solar planets are similar to ships found on a sea they move by this sea waves. Where the sea is the light motions, because of that the light motions define the planets motions range and creates their motions data.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves the light motion existence behind the planets motions and proves also that the light motion cause the planets motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter And Mercury Motions Analysis (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form And Based On One Geometrical Design.
- Means
- The distances be distributed based on geometrical design in comparison with other distances and no a single distance be created independent from the other distances
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Light Velocity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The solar group is created of energy provided by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The solar planets matters and their distances are created of energy provided by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
- The light velocity 1.16 mkm/s can be proved by The planets orbital and internal distances analysis where the distances are created and distributed based on a geometrical design depends on a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
- The light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity, because
- The sun light velocity (0.3 mkm/s) proves that, this light be produced as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/).
Paper conclusion
- The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion. which disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity Decisively.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The solar system distances network theory (revised 2)Gerges francis
The Solar System Distances Network Theory (Revised 2)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis.
- There's a light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/) moves in parallel to Mercury Motion.
Paper Hypotheses Explanation
- Planet Motion be a cover for a light motion found behind. The light motion uses Planet motion data for its own motion.
- The hypothesis creates one more universe in parallel to the universe of matter. And by that, The Planets be similar to ships sail over a sea. But the sea is light motions network.
- The hypothesis uses Mercury Motion as a examination point to prove that a motion of a light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/s) be behind Mercury Motion.
- The light motion causes to create the solar system distances in a network form and depends on one geometrical design. Because of that, the solar system distances analysis will prove the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created in a network form and depend on one geometrical design which proves that these distances be created by a motion of a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves The Light Supposed Velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) Existence.
- This proof disproves automatically Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- Because
- The sun rays velocity = 300000 km/sec.
- Where
- The solar system distances prove that they are created by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec.
- means,
- The sun light velocity (300000 km/) is created as a side product from the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s),
- means
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion
- Which disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)Gerges francis
Paper objective
The paper provides (1-50) questions and answers concerns the solar system motion analysis – The questions are:
1- Why do Venus and Uranus rotate on their axes, or spin, in a clockwise direction?
2- Does aether wind exist?
3- What are the major and most effective refutations of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity? Question Asked December 6, 2019.
4- Which is the most convincing physical experiment (Not Thought Experiment) that conclusively validates Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity?
5- The advance of Mercury perihelion is achieved in Newtonian gravity
6- Is Gravity a Push or a Pull?
7- Is our solar system exemplary for all other planetary systems?
8- Life on Mars: Open discussion
9- What do you think about wave-particle duality?
10- Is there somebody who believes in the theory of Everett (multitude of universes)? Do Einstein's Field Equations allow multiple universes?
11- Do the Gravitational force in between two objects depends on the most probable distance in between them?
12- What's underline the Lorentz transformation? And what's the dimension of the space?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
- The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
- The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
- Because
- The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
- Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Description (Revised)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Create One Unified General Motion.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells the planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- The hypothesis discovers One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, The Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
- Based on that, The Solar Planet Can't Change Its Motion.
- The Solar Planet creates its data to be in consistency with its motion.
- Because, the planet can't change its motion, but can change its data to be in consistency with its motion. and because of that, the planet data be created in consistency with its motion.
- Because the planet motion be complementary with other planets motions.
- The planet data be created complementary with other planets data
- Based On This Vision
- The solar planets data be created based on One Geometrical Design.
- And
- The Planets Creation And Motions Data Be Controlled By One Equation Only
- The paper hypothesis gives a different vision from the solar planets classical description. because its tells that, (The Solar Planet Data Be Created Based On Geometrical Calculations And Rules). The classical description tells planets data be created by random process and without geometrical reasons behind.
- The Planets Unified General Motion proves discussion shows that, the hypothesis tells the fact.
Paper Main Question
- Can The Planets Motions By Masses Gravity Forces Create The Planets Unified General Motion?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Machine Moves Completely Different From Newton TheoryGerges francis
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The solar planets move by a force different completely from The Sun Mass Gravity. Newton Theory is created out of imagination
Paper Hypothesis
The Inner Planets Move By An Electric Field
The Outer Planets Move By The Transportation Of Motion From the inner planets.
These facts are proved by the following 5 proves:
(1) Planet Motion Depends On Its neighbor Planet Motion And Not On The Sun
(2) The Outer Planets Motions are distinguish from the inner planets motions in their geometrical features. Which proves that both types of motions can't be created by the same one force.
(3) The Distances Equality in the solar system proves that planet motion doesn't depend on the sun gravity force, on the contrary it depends on Its neighbor planet motion. (Appendix no. 1)
(4) The solar planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion. this unified motion be similar to the train carriages motion. and the unified general motion proves that Planet motion depends on Its neighbor planet motion and not on the sun.
(5) The Planets Motion Dependency shows a clear trajectory of energy passes through the solar system. This energy trajectory starts from the inner planets to Jupiter to Uranus to Pluto and then to Neptune and again to the inner planets. The energy trajectory proves that planet motion depends on Its neighbor planet motion and not on the sun.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (III)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper provides (51-97) questions and answers concerns the solar system motion analysis – The questions are:
50- (repeated) How the planets data be created?
51- Are there relativistic effects in the solar system motions?
52- Can 1 second of Mercury Motion be = 9.18 Seconds of Pluto Motion?
53- Why Jupiter orbital circumference = the inner planets orbital circumferences total?
54- Can Uranus Motion Effect On Venus Axial Tilt
55- Why does Jupiter Motion Data Depend On The Rate 1.16
56- Why does the Earth moon regress 19 degrees yearly
57- Why Earth Circumference = the 5 inner planets diameters?
58- Why Bode Law Couldn't Predict Neptune Orbital Distance?
59- Can Uranus effect on the Earth moon motion?
60- Why does the moon create an angle between its displacement direction and its orbital horizontal level?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Data Analysis As Astrophysics Scientific Method.pdfGerges francis
Planet Data Analysis As Astrophysics Scientific Method
Abstract
Paper Discovery
- Planet Data Analysis should be considered the astrophysics research basic method.
- The paper proves that – We have to use planets data analysis to discover how the solar system be created and moving – the method provides safe approaches to conclude the facts and protects from the imaginary ideas –
- On the other side –
- Planets data analysis method proves – The big bang theory is wrong and Newton theory of the sun gravity is wrong – (also the method proves one light beam its velocity 1.16 million km per second be found) –
- The method opens a new page in the physics book because it provides a new source of knowledge to discover how the solar system be created and moving.
- The paper provides a new concept tells
(Planet Data Be Created Based On Geometrical Rules And Exact Equations)
And (One Law Controls All Planets Data)
- Based on this new concept – Planet Data Analysis can show The Geometrical Rules based on which this planet be created and moving.
- The paper explains and proves the idea shortly.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Can Light Velocity Effect On The Moon Orbital Motion? (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Question
-Can Light Velocity Effect On a Planet Motion?
The Question Explanation
- We observed frequently that, a Planet motion shows light motion features
- Indeed We have observed features as (different rates of time – Lorentz length Contraction phenomenon – distance values are used as periods of time) which are light motion features
- But,
- We couldn't catch the light motion (or any high velocity motion) can cause these features.
- because of that, I have to provide the detailed data in best order and description to be a source of knowledge to whom may concern to help.
- This paper provides a sufficient proof for the claim (Light Motion Features Are Discovered In Planets Motions). Where the paper tries to provide all detailed data and all possible support to whom tries to answer the question (How Can These Features Be Belonged To A Planet Motion?)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System (II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
Saturn Is The Last Planet Created In The Solar System
We complete our discussion about this hypothesis which we have started in the paper
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System?
The Idea Summary
- Saturn Data Is Similar To Other Planets Data – for example – Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars Orbital Circumference
- This data refers to that –Saturn may be created after Mars Creation (or vice versa) – but = because Saturn data depends on different planets data – for example – Saturn Diameter = Venus Circumference x π - So such data leads to the conclusion that Saturn may be created after all other planets – means – Saturn is the last planet created in the solar system
- Based on this claim we have 2 questions to discuss
o (1st Question) Can Any Planet Data Be Created Depending On Any Other Planet Data?
o (2nd Question) why Saturn data is created by these specific values? For example – Saturn orbital distance = Mars orbital circumference – based on that – I claim Saturn orbital distance is created depending on Mars orbital circumference – the question is – why? why Saturn doesn't any other planet orbital circumference? Why specially used Mars orbital circumference? And generally – if Saturn data is crated based on some planets data why Saturn used these specific planets data and other's
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc) this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024 kg also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from 6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Sun Is The Solar System Last Created Piece (Newton Was Wrong) (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity Be Refuted Decisively By 2 Facts Which Are:
- (1st Fact) The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion.
- (2nd Fact) The Solar Planets Move A Type Of Motion Different Completely From The Planet Motion Be Described By Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Paper Proves
- The (2nd Fact) is proved by The Solar Planets Motions Analysis.
- While Newton had supposed that, Each planet moves independently from the other planets. The fact is that, the planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion. by that, The Planets Motions Be similar to The Train Carriages Motion. or similar to A Machine Of Gears Motion.
- The Planets Motions Data Analysis disproves the Motion Independency Concept, showing that, the planets motions be different completely from Newton Motion Description.
- The (1st Fact) which is (The Sun is Created after all Planets Creation and Motion). This Fact disproves Newton Theory decisively. This fact proves are discussed in this paper introduction.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.2) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Be Built On One Geometrical Design (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar System Be Built On One Geometrical Design (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar System Be Built On One Geometrical Design
(As a result the planets data can be concluded theoretically without observation)
The hypothesis proves
Equation No. (1)
d2 = 4d0 (d-d0)
d = the planet orbital distance
d0 = The direct previous neighbor planet orbital distance
(Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus – Pluto depends on Uranus )
Equation No. (2)
(d1/d2) = (v2¬/v1)2
d1= Planet Orbital Distance (its velocity v1)
d2= Another Planet Orbital Distance (Not Neighbor) (its velocity v2)
Equation No. (3)
(v1/ v2) = s/r
r = Planet Diameter
s = The Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
The Proves Explanation
- Let's summarize the idea in following
- By Equation no. (1) we can conclude all planets orbital distances by using Mercury orbital distance (57.9 mkm) – if we know this data only – we can conclude by Equation no. (1) all planets orbital distances – means planet orbital distance depends n its neighbor orbital distance
- Equation no. (2) gives a extension for our knowledge – because – by Equation no. (2) we can conclude all planets velocities rates – that can help to define the planets orbital periods –
- We notice that, Equation no. (1) depends on planets order – but equation no. (2) doesn't depend on the planets order.
- Equation no. (3) can define planets diameters and rotation periods based on their velocities rate.
- Why do we need these equations?
- If we know (Mercury orbital distance =57.9 mkm) we can conclude theoretically (1) All Planets Orbital Distances (2) All Planets Velocities Rates and their orbital periods and (3) All Planets Diameters And Rotation Periods
- Why do we need that?
- Because the solar group data proves another vision for it – the planets aren't rigid bodies separated from one another – on the contrary- the planets be similar to parts in one geometrical design or members in one creature body – in more accurate – the planets be similar to stories in one building - they are created based on one another – as you see a child and discovers that its face is similar to its parent – or its eyes are similar to its mother – the persons are separated from one another but the data shows that they are created based on each other –when you look at them and decide they are separated persons – that means you are wrong – Newton is Mistaken –
- Based on this vision, the solar system motion must depend on One Geometrical Design,
- means
- The solar planets move one unified motion as train carriages move together. Or similar to ships sail over a sea move by this sea waves
- Also the solar group can be similar to 9 waterwheels be built on one canal and this canal water causes to rotate the 9 waterwheels. (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Abstract
Paper question
- Can The Motion Be Transported From A Solar Planet To Another?
The Question Explanation
- The planets use (8 days and 6 days) cycles and these cycles refers to a form of the transportation of motion among the solar planets
- The motion transportation is done based on different rates of time found among the planets
- Based on that
- 1 hour of Mercury motion be equivalent to 24 hours of Uranus motion
- And because
- (Venus velocity / Mercury velocity) = 0.738
- 1 hour of Venus motion be equivalent to 17.7 hours of Uranus motion
- This claim should be the paper hypothesis, where the paper tries to prove this fact
- By proving the different rates of time (specifically 1 hour of Venus Motion = 17.7 hours of Uranus Motion), that gives a reference of mutual effect of planets motion on one another which gives support for the motion transposition claim.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Sun Gravity Concept is Incorrect (Newton was wrong)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Don't Move By The Sun Masses Gravity Force.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Newton was wrong, There's no Gravity Of The Sun be used in the solar planets motions. the machine works completely different from Newton Description.
- The Inner Planets depend on Electric Field in Their Motions.
- The Outer Planets depend On The Motion Transportation from The Inner planets.
- Specifically, The Inner Planets transport their motions to Jupiter, and Jupiter transports this motion to the other outer planets.
- The Motion Transportation from Jupiter to the outer planets depends on Planet 8 Days Cycle.
- The Motion be Transported from Jupiter To Uranus depends on Planet 8 Days Cycle Also (By Effect of Pluto Motion).
- Uranus Transport The Motion to Pluto
- Uranus effect on Pluto motion creates a unification for the solar group motion.
- The Solar Planets Motions be unified in One General Unified Motion.
- The solar planets motions be similar to the Train Carriages Motion. Because The Planets motions be complementary with one another and create One General Unified Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion) Gerges francis
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion)
The Solar Group Geometrical Basic Features:
1- The Solar Group is One Trajectory of Energy and Each Planet is A point on it
2- The sun light is produced by accumulation of planets motions energies and transformation the mechanical waves into light waves
3- Solar Planets Data are created relative to each other
4- There Are relativistic effects in the solar group
5- The unit definition is relative and can change according to the observer situation
This paper discusses and tries to prove the previous features
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun GravityGerges francis
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The solar planets motions data analysis shows that the planets motions use different rates of time. As a result (for example) 1 h of Mercury motion = 24.6 h of Jupiter motion.
- The planets motions use different rates of time because they revolve their revolutions around the sun in equal periods of time.
- They need to revolve around the sun in equal periods of time because the planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion and the equal periods of time is necessary for the planets motions timing adjustments.
- This Vision Is Different From Newton Theory
- Based on that, we have a reason to refute Newton theory of the sun mass gravity.
- The situation is a complex because
- Newton theory is lived since four centuries and has a great effect.
- On the other side, The Planets Motions Data Analysis Shows A Complete Different Vision From Newton Theory And Ideas.
- I have used this paper Introduction to put the theoretical comparison between the 2 visions, trying to make them as clear as possible.
- The Paper Is Divided Into 3 Basic Subjects
- (1st Subject)
- The Theoretical Comparison Between The 2 Visions Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planets Motions Data Analysis – This Comparison Is Provided In This Paper INTRODUCTION. And This Comparison Summarizes The Paper Theoretical Argument
- (2nd Subject)
- The Planets Motions Data Analysis Be Provided In Part No. (I) Of This Paper
- (3rd Subject)
- The Solar Planets Creation Theory Be Provided In Part No. (II) Of This Paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Light Velocity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass GravityGerges francis
Light Velocity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- A Light Beam It Velocity=1.16 mkm/s Be A Companion With Mercury Motion.
The hypothesis explanation
- The hypothesis supposes that, the solar planets and their distances be created out of a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
- The hypothesis is a complex one because we need (at first) to prove that, there's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s.
- How can this hypothesis disprove Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity?
- The hypothesis supposes that, the solar group be created out of one light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s and the planets creation and motion data registers this light beam velocity because it's their source of energy.
- But
- The sun light velocity =300000 km.
- Means, this light beam (0.3 mkm/s) is created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s). and that proves the claim (The Sun is Created after all solar planets creation and motion) which disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass Gravity.
Paper objective
- The paper proves The light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Hypotheses
(1)
Planet Velocity shows, Planet Motion is a part of A Greater Motion-
(2)
Planet Velocity shows, Planets motions are similar to a train motion- it's one unified motion – and as a train moves with its carriages – the solar system moves one general motion with all planets. ("Train Motion Concept")
(3)
Planets different velocities can't disprove "Train Motion Concept".
(4)
Space is NOT nothingness but a geometrical player in the solar system geometry
(5)
Space & Matter are created relative (and complementary) to each other
The Solar System Motion Analysis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The paper suggests that, the solar group is similar to one machine of gears and each planet is a gear in it. or it's similar to one building and each planet is a part of this building.
- The paper vision tells that, the solar planets are created based on One Geometrical Design and because of that the planets data is created complementary with each other.
- Based on this vision, The Motion Must Be Transported Among The Solar Planets.
- The motion transportation doesn't force us to attribute mechanical features for the space, because the motion transportation isn't done mechanically.
- As a result for the motion transportation through the solar system, the Planets motions use different rates of time.
- As example of the different rates of time
- 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 9.18 hours of Pluto Motion. But
- 1 hour of Earth Motion = 6.387 hours of Pluto Motion
- The solar planets motions different rates of time be unified and created one general rate of time.
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses and proves The Motion Transportation Concept among the solar planets
- And
- The paper discusses and proves the solar planets motions using of different rates of time.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
In this paper we compare between the physics current theories which try to explain the solar system motions and the planets real data – this is a known process in physics
Example No. 1
Lorentz Length Contraction Phenomenon tells that- a particle with length L0 will be contracted to L1 when this particle travels with high velocity motion.
¬¬¬
So the question is – Why the particle length is contracted with high velocity motion?
Some physics books tell that, this contraction is just illusion of measurements!
That means, Lorentz Transformations measure illusions and not facts!
We refused that,
But if the particle own length contracted by high velocity motion –that will make the particle properties as a function of its motion – means –Particle mass is created by this particle motion
Newton told us a planet moves basically by masses gravity with the sun - so what's first and what's the second? what's the reason and what's the result
The mass causes the motion (Newton) or the motion defines the mass (Lorentz)?
Similar to this argument we will discuss how to discover the solar system.
Paper Objective
The paper tries to show that Jupiter Data can't be explained by the solar system current theories.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Similar to Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Sérgio Sacani
The ambient solar wind that flls the heliosphere originates from multiple
sources in the solar corona and is highly structured. It is often described
as high-speed, relatively homogeneous, plasma streams from coronal
holes and slow-speed, highly variable, streams whose source regions are
under debate. A key goal of ESA/NASA’s Solar Orbiter mission is to identify
solar wind sources and understand what drives the complexity seen in the
heliosphere. By combining magnetic feld modelling and spectroscopic
techniques with high-resolution observations and measurements, we show
that the solar wind variability detected in situ by Solar Orbiter in March
2022 is driven by spatio-temporal changes in the magnetic connectivity to
multiple sources in the solar atmosphere. The magnetic feld footpoints
connected to the spacecraft moved from the boundaries of a coronal hole
to one active region (12961) and then across to another region (12957). This
is refected in the in situ measurements, which show the transition from fast
to highly Alfvénic then to slow solar wind that is disrupted by the arrival of
a coronal mass ejection. Our results describe solar wind variability at 0.5 au
but are applicable to near-Earth observatories.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Slide 1: Title Slide
Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Slide 2: Introduction to Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Definition: Extrachromosomal inheritance refers to the transmission of genetic material that is not found within the nucleus.
Key Components: Involves genes located in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and plasmids.
Slide 3: Mitochondrial Inheritance
Mitochondria: Organelles responsible for energy production.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in mitochondria.
Inheritance Pattern: Maternally inherited, meaning it is passed from mothers to all their offspring.
Diseases: Examples include Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and mitochondrial myopathy.
Slide 4: Chloroplast Inheritance
Chloroplasts: Organelles responsible for photosynthesis in plants.
Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in chloroplasts.
Inheritance Pattern: Often maternally inherited in most plants, but can vary in some species.
Examples: Variegation in plants, where leaf color patterns are determined by chloroplast DNA.
Slide 5: Plasmid Inheritance
Plasmids: Small, circular DNA molecules found in bacteria and some eukaryotes.
Features: Can carry antibiotic resistance genes and can be transferred between cells through processes like conjugation.
Significance: Important in biotechnology for gene cloning and genetic engineering.
Slide 6: Mechanisms of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Non-Mendelian Patterns: Do not follow Mendel’s laws of inheritance.
Cytoplasmic Segregation: During cell division, organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts are randomly distributed to daughter cells.
Heteroplasmy: Presence of more than one type of organellar genome within a cell, leading to variation in expression.
Slide 7: Examples of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Four O’clock Plant (Mirabilis jalapa): Shows variegated leaves due to different cpDNA in leaf cells.
Petite Mutants in Yeast: Result from mutations in mitochondrial DNA affecting respiration.
Slide 8: Importance of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Evolution: Provides insight into the evolution of eukaryotic cells.
Medicine: Understanding mitochondrial inheritance helps in diagnosing and treating mitochondrial diseases.
Agriculture: Chloroplast inheritance can be used in plant breeding and genetic modification.
Slide 9: Recent Research and Advances
Gene Editing: Techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 are being used to edit mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA.
Therapies: Development of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT) for preventing mitochondrial diseases.
Slide 10: Conclusion
Summary: Extrachromosomal inheritance involves the transmission of genetic material outside the nucleus and plays a crucial role in genetics, medicine, and biotechnology.
Future Directions: Continued research and technological advancements hold promise for new treatments and applications.
Slide 11: Questions and Discussion
Invite Audience: Open the floor for any questions or further discussion on the topic.
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderlandRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo –Egypt –16th
September 2021
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
- Where
- Planet Motion Features Prove Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- Many new features are discovered in the solar planets motions among which:
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
- The previous features disprove Planet Motion Independency Concept inherited by
Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity- the features simply gives us a different
vision about the solar system motion.
- Instead of the rigid body moving by the sun mass gravity independently from other
rigid bodies in creation and motion data, The Solar Planet be a similar to a point on
one trajectory of energy. where the solar planets move together one unified motion
as train carriages transporting among the planets the motion with the rates of time
making the solar system as a great Clock its input one motion creates (one second)
and its output another motion creates (one solar day).
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
- And the 2 motions depend on one another as 2 gears in one machine of gears.
- Can this vision be a fact?
- I claim Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is created out of imagination
basically because the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
- How can I prove my idea against Newton theory?
- By Planets Motions Data Analysis
Paper objective
- We have a method to test any theory – by that we can protect ourselves from any
imaginary idea –
- The method is (The Solar Planets Motions Data Analysis)
- For example,
- I claim, the planets move one unified motion – but Newton told that- Planet Moves
independently from all other planets motions – by what method we can test these 2
ideas in comparison? By The Planets Motions Data – that shows the power
which I have to write against Newton theory – because I analyze the planets
motions data – and if my explanation be refused – that changes nothing because
the data still need explanation – Newton told us that – Planet moves interpedently
– but we see no data supports this idea – but planets motions data supports the
conclusion that these planets move one unified motion –by that– I don't put myself
against Newton- instead – I put the planets motions data and ask if Newton theory
can explain it
Paper argument
- Why Newton theory is mistaken and lived so long?
- Because, the basic question be left behind (how the matter is created?)
- Matter is created out of light and the born matter isn't separated from its parent
light beam – by that – light motion effects on matter motion features – as a result –
we have discovered light motion features are used by planets motions – here we
have conclude that Newton must have been wrong.
Please scan the figure (ORCID)
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
Paper Contents
Subject Page No.
1- Introduction 5
2- Methodology 8
Paper Part No. (I) 11
3- Jupiter Motion Analysis 12
3-1 Preface 13
3-2 Mercury, Mars and Jupiter Motions Comparison 14
3-3 Jupiter Orbital Period Analysis 18
3-4 Jupiter Orbital Circumference Discussion 29
3-5 Mars Rotation Period Analysis 33
4- Mercury Motion Distance During Its Day Period 44
4-1 Preface 45
4-2 Why Mercury Jupiter Distance =720.7 mkm? 46
4-3 Pluto Motion For A Distance =720.7 mkm 50
4-4 Jupiter Motion In A Comparison With Light Motion 56
5- Planets Unified General Motion 62
5-1 Preface 63
5-2 The Planets Unified General Motion Description 64
5-3 The Solar Planets Motions Are Complementary One Another 65
5-4 The Solar Planets Move An Unified Motion (A Team Motion) 70
6- The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time 75
6-1 Preface 76
6-2 Planet motion rate of time suggested rule 79
6-3 Mercury Pluto Motions Rate of Time 85
6-4 Mercury Saturn Motions Rate of Time 91
6-5 The Double Using Of One Rate Of Time 99
6-6 Earth, its moon And Pluto Motions Rates Of Time 101
6-7 Earth And Saturn Motions Rates Of Time 112
6-8 Mars Rates Of Time 115
6-9 Jupiter Rates Of Time 116
6-10 Venus Rates of Time 120
7-The Solar System Distances Be In A Network Form 121
7-1 Preface 121
7-2 Planets Motions Data Analysis 122
8- Jupiter orbital Circumference Analysis 124
8-1 Preface 125
8-2 Jupiter orbital Circumference Analysis 126
9- The Solar System Historical Development 140
9-1 Preface 141
9-2 Mars Migration Theory 143
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
9-3 Pluto Migration Theory 146
9-4 Planets Migration Theories Proves 148
9-5 The Sun Age Description 151
10- Saturn Motion Analysis 164
10-1 Preface 165
10-2 Saturn Motion Analysis 166
Paper Part No. (II) The Solar System Creation Theory 168
11- The Solar System Creation Theory 169
11-1 Preface 170
11-2 The Solar System Creation Theory 172
11-3 The Inner Planets Motions Reason 177
11-4 Light Beam (1.16 mkm/sec) Proves Discussion 181
11-5 Saturn Motion More Analysis 219
11-6 Equation Distances Feature 226
12-The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form 232
12-1 Preface 233
12-2 The Continuum effect Through the Solar System Distances 235
12-3 The Solar System Distances Distribution 240
12-4 The Solar System Distances Dependency On One Another 245
Appendix No. (1) The Moon Orbital Motion Equation 247
References and Biography 262
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
1-Introdcution
- Newton Theory is lived 400 years – for that – we should have something strong to
write against
- I have The Planets Motions Data Analysis
- I claim, no one analyzed the planets motions data and because of that we lived in
imagination for long time –
- The idea is a simple and clear – Newton gave us a theory – it's good but how to
test it? how to know if this theory tells facts?
- The planets motions data should answer this question –the theory tries to explain
the planets motions –and if the theory can't explain this data – that means- this
theory is mistaken – it's simple and clear idea –
- The point is that- no planet data be used to test any theory – for example
- 4331 days (Jupiter Orbital Period) = 687 days (Mars orbital period) x 2π
- Why?
- This data is removed without explanation! And
- 1433 mkm (Saturn Orbital Distance)=227.9 days (Mars Orbital Distance) x 2π
- This data also be removed without explanation- no planet data be seen here – we
simply believe the theory –
- But
- The theory even doesn't answer the basic question (how the matter is created?)
- I want to say
- The theory be formed, and after birth, we found it answers one part of a theoretical
description –and this part doesn't depend on any planet data. and this part isn't
qualified to be complementary with any new parts to give a complete description
explains planet motion – why the theory be acceptable?
- The theory is mistaken
- It's wrong not only in concept but also in methodology – because it cut the sources
of knowledge and gave us a separated piece of imagination we have to believe in.
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
- The critic is written because the theory doesn't create a method to use planets
motions data as a measurement for the theory sufficiency.
- If Newton did that, he would give us a method to test his ideas and to correct the
wrong trajectory for long time
- We should see the force of this paper
- It's not any idea be written here whatsoever this idea intelligence
- The paper force is that, it proves the planets data with forms of analysis and gives
a chance for better analysis to be done by any one to help our investigation to
discover how the solar planets be created and moving.
- Again
- Why Newton Theory is Mistaken and lived so long?
- Because, the basic question lest behind (How the matter is created?)
- This question answer can help greatly to discover the planet motion
- Now
- My answer for this question is the following:
- The matter is created out of light, and the born matter isn't separated from its
parent light beam but move with it in one unified motion by using different rates of
time – by that- the rigid body motion in fact shows light motion features because
the matter is created out of light – this is my theory to answer the question
- And
- This paper is divided into 2 parts
- (1st
Part)
- This part analyzes the planets motions data to prove that there 4 new features of
motions be discovered and can't be explained by Newton Theory which are
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
- (2nd
Part)
- This part provides my theory trying to show the planets data be created depends on
light motion effect on planets motions.
-
- I want to say that
- I don't provide a theory and try to prove it
- I provide analysis for the planets motions data which create thousands of questions
all of them contradicts Newton Theory – and so- My theory is a try to answer these
questions
- That means, this paper power isn't the theory I provide here but
- Its power is the planets motions data analysis –which we discuss in so deep and
wide discussions – for that reason – the respectful reader will not have to read my
ideas –but will b rich greatly with planets motions data – and then my theory will
be a try to explain this data – If it does that sufficiently it will be good otherwise
the respectful reader can help with his opinions because he has all data I have and
can create more correct idea – I try to show that – why this paper is useful
- Let's take a look on the paper contents
- The Paper first Part analyzes the planets motions data
- The Paper first Part provides matter Creation Theory and create anew reading for
the planets motions data.
- For contents details please see the contents table
- Best Greetings
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
2-Methodology
- I use the planets motions data analysis in comparison with the theories which try to
explain the planets motions- let's use one example to explain how this method
works?
- Example No. 1
- Newton told us– The planet motion be independent from all other planets motions
- This is the theory – let's see some planets motions data for a comparison
- Data
(1)
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
= Mars Orbital Circumference
= Pluto Neptune Distance (error 1.5%)
= Pluto eccentricity Distance (error 1.5%)
= Neptune Orbital Distance/π
= Uranus Orbital Distance /2
(2)
Mercury Neptune Distance = Saturn Pluto Distance
Jupiter Pluto Distance = Uranus Neptune Circumference
Earth Neptune Distance = Mercury Saturn Circumference (0.5%)
(3)
Jupiter Mercury Distance = 2 Mercury Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Venus Distance = Venus Orbital Circumference (1.5%)
Jupiter Earth Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference (1.2%)
(Earth and Jupiter at 2 different sides from the sun)
(4)
Jupiter Mercury Distance = Mars Orbital Distance x π (0.6%)
Jupiter Uranus Distance = Venus Jupiter Circumference (0.8%)
Pluto Orbital Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference x 2π
Why These Distances Are Equal?
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
- The solar system has around (45 distances) and these distance are around (25
distances) why they are equal one another? Can Planets Independent Motions
Cause These Distances Equality?
- In some desert someone sees a mirage and thought it's a water! How can we prove
to him that this is a mirage and Not a water?
- Newton told that, Planets Motions be Independent From One Another, and as a
result - The solar system distances be created based on each other in a Network
form where more than 50% of all distances are equal one another!!
- I try to show that – it was not so great job to disprove Newton Theory – but the
book removes the planets motions data – this is the question – why?
- The planets creations and motions data should be similar to a creature genes which
can tell us how this planet be created and moving – so whatsoever the theory be
the planets motions data be more important than it – and by that – even if Newton
was correct, there's no reason to remove the planets motions data from the book
- The planets motions data is a method almost used by Kepler –
- Let's use one more example
- Example No. 2
- 778.6 mkm = 1.0725 x 720.7 mkm (Mercury Jupiter Distance)
- 720.7 mkm = 1.0725 x 671 mkm (Venus Jupiter Distance)
- 671 mkm = 1.0725 x 629 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance)
- 629 mkm = (1.0725)2
x 550.7 mkm (Mars Jupiter Distance)
- 550.7 mkm = (1.0725) x 511 mkm
- 4900 mkm = (1.0725) x 4495.1 mkm (Neptune Orbital Distance) (1.6%)
- 1375 mkm = (1.0725) x 1284 mkm (Earth Saturn Distance)
- 4900 mkm = Jupiter orbital circumference
- 1375mkm = Mercury Saturn Circumference
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
- The previous distances are 13 distances (30%) of all distances- they are example of
many others- the question is why they are rated with the same one rate (1.0725)?
- I try to show, some geometrical force moves through the planets motions data.
This force is stronger than any planet motion and force all of them to use the same
one rate – No Independent Motion Be Found Here – the data simply disproves
Newton Theory
- The previous data is example for wide range of data – I add some more of them
here to show the strong force range of using this rate (1.0725)
- (28.3 deg / 26.7 deg) =(26.7 deg /25.2 deg) = (25.2 deg /23.4 deg) = (122.5 /115.2)
= (1.0725)
- Where
- 28.3 degrees = Neptune Axial Tilt
- 26.7 degrees = Saturn Axial Tilt
- 25.2 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt
- 23.4 degrees = Earth Axial Tilt
- 115.2 degrees = 90 degrees + 25.2 degrees (Mars Axial Tilt)
- 122.5 degrees = Pluto Axial Tilt.
- Shortly
- The planets data analysis put the data in comparison with the theories to test the
theory sufficiency.
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
Paper Part No. (I)
The Solar Planets Motions Data Analysis
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
3- Jupiter Motion Analysis
3-1 Preface
3-2 Mercury, Mars and Jupiter Motions Comparison
3-3 Jupiter Orbital Period Analysis
3-4 Jupiter Orbital Circumference Discussion
3-5 Mars Rotation Period Analysis
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
13
3-1 Preface
- We analyze Jupiter motion in comparison with Mercury and Mars motions
- Because
- 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) = 687 days (Mars orbital period) x 2π
- And
- 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) = 175.94 days (Mercury Day Period) x 24.6
- (24.6 h =Mars Rotation Period)
- This data shows puzzles in the 3 planets motions because they creates some
equality between their periods of time and we have no explanation how this
equality can be found?
- As a result
- We hoped to see as deep as possible the connection origin among these 3 planets
motions.
- Shortly
- We need to know, if these 3 planets cycles periods be connected based on their
motions or the numbers be equal by chance.
- For that w should analyze this three planets motions in the next point to see the
cycles connection depth
- Let's do that in the next point
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
14
3-2 Mercury, Mars and Jupiter Motions Comparison
I-Data
(No. 1) (Mercury and Mars Motions)
- Mercury moves during its day period (4222.6 h.) a distance = 720.7 mkm
- Mars moves during (2802 hours) a distance = 243 mkm
- Mercury moves during (1407.6 hours) a distance = 243 mkm (error 1%)
- Mars moves during 346.6 d. a distance =720.7 mkm (Mercury Jupiter Dis.)
- Mercury moves during 346.6 d. a distance =1419 mkm (with 1433 error 1%)
- Mars moves during 687 d. a distance = 1433 mkm (Mars orbit. Circum)
- Mercury moves during 687 d. a distance =2815mkm (Mercury Uranus Dis.)
- Mars moves during 4331d. a distance = 9010mkm (Saturn orbit. Circum)
- Mercury moves during 4331d. a distance = 2815 mkm x 2π
- Mars moves during 224.7 d. a distance = π x 149.6 mkm (Earth orb. Dis)
- Mercury moves during 224.7 d. a distance = 920 mkm (with 929 error 1%)
- Mars moves during 365.25 d. a distance = π x 243 mkm (0.5%)
- Mercury moves during 365.25 d. a distance = 2 x 748 mkm
- Mars moves during 5040s. a distance= 121464 km= Saturn Diameter (+1%)
- Mercury moves during 5040s. a distance= 238896 km= 2 Saturn Diameters (-1%)
Where
1407.6 h = Mercury Rotation Period 2802 h = Venus Day Period
346.6 days = the nodal year 224.7 days = Venus orbital period
687 days = Mars Orbital Period
4331 days = Jupiter orbital period = 2π x 687 days
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
15
(No. 2) (Mars And Jupiter Motions)
- Mars moves during 636.7 days a distance =1325 mkm= (Venus Saturn Dis.)
- Jupiter moves during 636.7 days a distance =720.7 mkm
- Mars moves during 687 d. a distance= 1433 mkm= Mars Orbital Circumference
- Jupiter moves during 687 d. a distance= 778.6 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Distance
- Mars moves during 4331d. a distance= 9010 mkm= Saturn orbital circumference
- Jupiter moves during 4331 d. a distance= 4900 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Circum.
- Mars moves during 778.6 d. a distance = 1622 mkm = Uranus Neptune Dis.
- Jupiter moves during 778.6 d a distance= 881 mkm =58 days x 15.19 mkm.
- ( 15.19 mkm = the 9 solar planets motions distances total per a solar day).
- Notice
- 2.082 mkm / day x 778.6 days = 1622 mkm = 1.1318 mkm /day x 1433 days
- Where
- 2.082 mkm /day = Mars Velocity Per A Solar Day
- 4.095 mkm /day = Mercury Velocity Per A Solar Day
- 1.13184 mkm /day = Jupiter Velocity Per A Solar Day
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
16
(No. 3) (Mercury And Jupiter Motions)
- Mercury moves during 687 d. a distance= 2815 mkm= Mercury Uranus Distance
- Jupiter moves during 687 d. a distance= 778.6 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Distance
- Mercury moves during 1433 d. a distance =5848 mkm= Mercury Pluto Dis.
- Jupiter moves during 1433 d a distance =1622 mkm=Uranus Neptune Dis.
- Mercury moves during 4331d. a distance= 2815 mkm x 2π
- Jupiter moves during 4331 d. a distance= 4900 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Circum.
- Mercury moves during 4222.6 h a distance = 720.7 mkm
- Jupiter moves during 4222.6 h a distance = 200 mkm = 629 mkm/π
- Mercury moves during 550.7 d a distance = π x 720.7 mkm (0.4%)
- Jupiter moves during 550.7 d a distance = 629 mkm (error 1%)
For summary,
Data Group No. (1)
- Mars moves during 687 d. a distance= 1433 mkm= Mars Orbital Circumference
- Mars moves during 4331d. a distance= 9010 mkm= Saturn orbital circumference
- Mars moves during 4331 x π d a distance= 28255 mkm= Neptune orbital circumference
Data Group No. (2)
- Mercury moves during 687 d. a distance= 2815 mkm= Mercury Uranus Distance
- Mercury moves during 4331d. a distance= 2815 mkm x 2π
Data Group No. (3)
- Jupiter moves during 687 d. a distance= 778.6 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Distance
- Jupiter moves during 4331 d. a distance= 4900 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Circum.
17. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
17
II-Discussion
- The planets move defined distances in defined periods of time.
- The Defined Distance means a distance is known in the solar system, as to be any
planet orbital distance or a distance between any 2 planets.
- The Defined Period Of Time means a period of any planet cycle, as 365.25 days
(Earth orbital period) or any planet orbital period. Or any planet rotation period or
any planet day period. All these periods are defined periods of time
- The argument tells that
- If the solar planets move their motions independently from one another, based on
that, the planets motions during defined periods of time should pass (random)
distances. Because these Planets are independent in their motion from one
another. (For example) Mercury motion depends on its orbital period (88 days) and
doesn't interest neither for Mars orbital period (687 days) nor for Jupiter orbital
period (4331 days) and by that, Mercury during these periods (687 days and 4331
days) should move Random distances (not be one of the solar system distances).
- The data disproves Planet Motion Independency Concept. because the (3)
planets move defined distances in defined periods of time. These planets motions
aren't independent from one another. These motions are done based on One
Geometrical Design. And these motions be similar to Chess Board Pieces
Motions. Each Motion is calculated geometrically and be obligatory and takes into
consideration the other planets motions and their effects.
18. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
18
3-3 Jupiter Orbital Period Analysis
I- Data
(3-3-a)
4331 days = 2π x 687 days = 175.94 days x 24.6
(3-3-b)
671 hours (of Mercury) =687 days (of Jupiter) =109 days (of Mars) =1705 days
(Saturn) = 859 hours (Venus)
But f
687 days (Mars Orbital Period) x 24 = 24.6 h (Mars Rotation Period) x 671
(3-3-c)
10747 days x 24 h = 24.6 hours x 10485
but
4331 days x 24 h = 9.9 hours x 10499
(3-3-d)
4331 days =224.7 days x 19.27
(3-3-e)
(10747 /4331) =(24.6/9.9) = (24.1/9.7) = (17.4/7) =2.48
19. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
19
II- Discussion
- In this point we analyze Jupiter orbital period to know why it's created in
proportionality with Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- I suppose that, the equality of cycles creates equality of the motion rates of time –
means, where
- 4331 days = 2π x 687 days = 175.94 days x 24.6 - And
- 4331 days = Jupiter Orbital Period 687 days = Mars Orbital Period
- 175.94 days = Mercury Day Period
- Based on this equality, I suppose that
- 1h of Mercury motion = 24.6 h of Jupiter motion =3.91 h of Mars motion
- These rates of time I suppose based on the equality of the cycles periods
- And
- Our discussion will depend on this hypothesis and test it to know if it's a fact
- But
- This is (just) a method of analysis – I don't here defend this hypothesis as a fact
(spite it's a real fact) but I don't fight for it – it's a method for analysis – or an
approach for analysis –
- We put the 3 planets motions data face one another and create comparisons among
them. The comparisons can give us the required proves for what's going.
- I want to say that,
- Our eyes should not be in confusion for vision with this hypothesis – our eyes
should look directly to the planets data and know how this planets be created –
because the proportionality between the 3 planets isn't just rates as (2π) or (24.6)
but tenths of rates all of them be used frequently are found among these 3 planets
motions – the idea is that – these 3 planets motions depend on one geometrical
design and by that their motions be defined in comparison with one another – here
our useful result will not be only to disprove Newton theory but we will use these
comparisons to see as deep as possible these plants motions features.
20. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
20
Equation No. (3-3-a)
4331 days = 2π x 687 days = 175.94 days x 24.6
- Where
- 4331 solar days = Jupiter Orbital Period
- 687 solar days = Mars Orbital Period
- 175.94 solar days = Mercury Day Period
- 24.6 hours = Mars Rotation Period
- Equation no. (3-3-a) is our equation for which we do the planets motions
comparison, it gives an interesting suggestion….
- It tells
- 1 h of Mercury motion = 3.91 h of Mars Motion = 24.6 h of Jupiter Motion
- And
- 1 h of Mars Motion = 2π h of Jupiter Motion
- The equation provides the rates of time between the 3 planets motions.
- The equation gives us a new vision about the solar planets motions. it suggests that
the planets motions use different rates of time and these rates can be discovered
by comparisons between Planets Motions Data.
- As we consider this explanation of the equation, it's just a suggestion and we need
to prove it and understand how that can be possible, the next equation can help our
investigation… but
- The question – how planets low velocity can use different rates of time? The
answer of this question depends on the sun effect on Planets Cycles Periods
Creation – We discuss this question in point no. (8) (Planets Motions Use Different
Rates Of Time) in that point we discuss widely Planets motions using of different
rates of time.
21. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
21
Equation No. (3-3-b)
671 hours (of Mercury) =687 days (of Jupiter) =109 days (of Mars)
- Equation no. (3-3-a) tells that, 1 day of Mercury Motion = 24.6 days of Jupiter
Motion = 3.91 days of Mars Motion
- And
- 1 day of Mars motion be = 2π days of Jupiter Motion.
- Equation (3-3-b) uses these same rates
- 671 hours of Mercury motion = 671 h x 24.6 (= 687 solar days) of Jupiter motion
= 671 h x 3.91 (= 109.3 solar days) of Mars Motion
- Now we have 3 periods of time depend on the suggested rates of time we have
discussed in the previous equation
- Now, How To Prove These Periods Are Equal? let's see the planets motions
distances during these periods
- Mercury moves during (671 h) a distance = 2 x 57.2 mkm ( = Mercury orbital
distance - error 1%)
- Jupiter moves during (687 days) a distance =778.6 mkm ( = Jupiter orbital
distance)
- Mars moves during (109.3 days) a distance =227.9 mkm ( = Mars orbital
distance)
- Means,
- The planets during these periods move distances equal their orbital distances but
Mercury moves a double value of its orbital distance
- We use this result as a rule for now and later we should see if it's working rule
- But
- Why these planets move during these periods of time distances equal their orbital
distances?! And the most important why Mercury moves a double value?!
- The data tells,
22. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
22
- Some fact be found behind the suggested motions rates of time. Because the
planets move during these periods distances equal orbital distance, in this case we
consider Mercury is exceptional and we should later ask why it moves double
value of its orbital distance?
- Now we have a rule tells
- The period be used by a planet motion to pass distance = its orbital distance, this
period can be compared with 671 hours of Mercury motion to define the rate of
time between Mercury and this planet motions –
- Let's test it in the next equation…
23. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
23
Equation No. (3-3-c)
10747 days x 24 h = 24.6 hours x 10485
but
4331 days x 24 h = 9.9 hours x 10499
- Where
- 10747 days = Saturn Orbital Period
- 4331 days = Jupiter Orbital Period
- 24.6 hours = Mars Rotation Period
- 9.9 hours = Jupiter Rotation Period
- The values (10499 and 10485 are equal because the difference is 0.1%)
- Equation no. (3-3-c) tells that
- (10747 days /4331days) = (24.6 h /9.9 h) =2.48
- And for that, Saturn orbital period (10747 days) = (10485 rotation period)
- And
- Jupiter orbital period (4331 days) = (10499 Jupiter days periods)
- Can 1 hour of Jupiter motion =2.48 hours of Saturn motion? Can this rate of
time be a real one?
- 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 24.6 hour of Jupiter Motion
- Based on the previous conclusion
- 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 61 hours of Jupiter Motion
- Based on that
- 61 hours of Saturn motion = 1 hour of Mercury Motion
- 2.48 hours Saturn motion = 1 hour of Jupiter Motion
- 15.6 hours Saturn motion = 1 hour of Mars Motion
- Let's return to equation no. (3-3-b)
24. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
24
Equation No. (3-3-b)
671 hours (of Mercury) =687 days (of Jupiter) =109 days (of Mars) = 1705.5 days
(Saturn)
- We know that
- Mercury moves during (671 h) a distance = 2 x 57.2 mkm ( = Mercury orbital
distance - error 1%)
- Jupiter moves during (687 days) a distance =778.6 mkm ( = Jupiter orbital
distance)
- Mars moves during (109.3 days) a distance =227.9 mkm ( = Mars orbital
distance)
- And Now
- Saturn moves during (1705.5 days) a distance =1430 mkm (= Saturn orbital
distance)
- And Also
- Venus moves during (859 hours) a distance =108.2 mkm (= Venus Orbital
Distance)
- Notice
- 3.1 deg (Jupiter Axial Tilt) x 0.8 =2.48 deg (Saturn Orbital Inclination)
- 0.8 deg = Uranus Orbital Inclination
- Notice
- 1440 minutes = 61 x 23.6
25. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
25
Planets Motions Rates Of Time (A Short List)
- 1 hour of Mercury motion = 9.18 hours of Pluto motion
- 1 hour of Mercury motion = 24.6 hours of Jupiter motion
- 1 hour of Mercury motion = 61 hours of Saturn motion
- 1 hour of Mercury motion = 3.91 hours of Mars motion
- 1 hour of Mercury motion = 1.279 hours of Venus motion
- And
- 1 hour of Pluto motion = 6.64 hours of Saturn motion
- 1 hour of Pluto motion = 2.679 hours of Jupiter motion
- 1 hour of Pluto motion = 4.61 hours of the moon motion
- 1 hour of Jupiter motion = 1.72 hours of the moon motion
- 1 hour of Earth motion = 2π hours of Pluto motion - And
- 1 hour of Venus motion = 3.057 hours of Mars motion
Data analysis
- 120536 seconds of Saturn Motion = 18142 seconds of Pluto Motion x 6.64
- 18142 seconds = 5.04 hours
- 30589 seconds x 2 = 12104 x 5.05
- 10747 days x 24 h = 10.7 h x 2 x 12053 and 1433 mkm = (12053 km x π)2
- From the previous data we conclude the following:
- 120536 seconds of Saturn motion be =5.04 hours of Pluto motion - But
- 1 hour of Pluto = 4.61 hours of the moon motion, Based on that,
- 5.04 hours of Pluto motion =23.23 hours of the moon motion (where 23.45
degrees = Earth Axial Tilt) (error 1%)
- Notice
- 1 hour of Jupiter motion = 2.48 hours of Saturn motion
- 1557.2 hours of Saturn motion = 629 hours of Jupiter motion - where
- 1557.2 mkm = 2 x 778.6 mkm (Jupiter orbital distance)
- 629 mkm = Earth Jupiter Distance
26. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
26
II- Discussion (continued)
- We here don't discuss Planets Motions Rates Of Time, Because this subject is
discussed deeply in Point no. (6) in this current paper.
- We here analyze Planets Motions Features, and through our analysis Planets
Motions Rates of time be referred and discussed briefly. For that reason we don't
try to prove the rates of time using – because we here refers to a short reference for
this using – in Point no.(6) there are many proves and different discussions to
show that the rates of time using is a basic feature in for the solar planets motion.
- Notice (2)
- The solar planets motions using of different rates of time makes the solar system to
work as a clock – means,
- Each planet provide its motion rate of time and the planets rates of time be unified
in one general rate by that, the solar system be similar to a great clock – because
the solar system uses energy of a motion for 1 second – and by this energy the
solar system produces another motion for 1 solar day –
- Let's write this idea in more clear words -
- The solar system uses energy of light motion for a period 1second and by this
energy the solar system produces a planet motion for 1soalr day – this is the basic
job of the solar system motion – but
- Light motion effect on planet motion is a subject will be discussed in part no. (II)
of this paper. I don't want to discuss this idea in any discussion before part (II)
because the paper provides data analysis and the data analysis shows facts has no
doubt – I don't want to write any of my ideas here which can create some doubt
against the data analysis – for that reason I keep the explanation to be written in
Part (II) of this paper –
- But
- The solar system uses of different rates of time basically to use 1 second of light
motion energy to produce by it a planet motion for 1 solar day.
27. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
27
Equation no. (3-3-d)
4331 days =224.7 days x 19.27
- Where
- 1 hour of Mercury motion = 1.279 hours of Venus motion
- 1 hour of Venus motion = 3.057 hours of Mars motion
- And
- 224.7 days (Venus orbital period) x 3.057 = 687 days (Mars orbital period)
- Equation no. (3-3-d) shows that, the rate of time between Mercury and Venus
motions (1.279) is the correct rate –and that supports the rule which be used to
define this rate –
- The data simply supports the discussion and shows that it moves in the right way –
28. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
28
Equation no. (3-3-e)
(10747 /4331) =(24.6/9.9) = (24.1/9.7) = (17.4/7) =2.48
- Where
- 10747 days = Saturn Orbital Period
- 4331 days = Jupiter Orbital Period
- 24.6 hours = Mars Rotation Period
- 9.9 hours = Jupiter Rotation Period
- 24.1 km/s = Mars Velocity
- 9.7 km/s = Saturn Velocity
- 17.4 deg = The Inner Planets Orbital Inclinations Total
- 7 deg = Mercury Orbital Inclination
- This equation should be discussed later in this paper deeply as possible –
- But
- This equation be added here to show that,
- Saturn rate of time we have concluded, which is (1h or Mercury Motion =61 of
Saturn Motion) and (1h of Jupiter Motion =2.48 h of Saturn Motion)
- These rates are effective deeply on the planets motions data –as seen in the
equation – the shows that one connection connects Jupiter, Saturn and Mars
Motion – that may help to explain our old data which is
- 331 days (Jupiter Orbital Period) =2π x 687 days (Mars Orbital Period)
- 1433mkm (Saturn Orbital Distance) =2πx 227.9 mkm (Mars Orbital Distance)
- This data should be put beside equation no (3-3-d) which can tell clearly that one
connection be found behind all this data. for that we should discuss this equation
later deeply
- Notice
- (17.4 mkm / 7mkm) = 2.5
- Light known velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) x 23.4 s = 7 mkm
- Light known velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) x 57.9 seconds = 17.37 mkm
29. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
29
3-4 Jupiter Orbital Circumference Discussion
I-Data
(3-4-a)
1.16 mkm =13.1 km/sec x 24.6 h x 3600 sec.
(3-4-b)
4900 mkm = 1.16 x 4224
(3-4-c)
4900 mkm = 199.2 mkm x 24.6
(3-4-d)
4900 mkm = 0.406 mkm x 12104 = 0.384 mkm x 12756
(3-4-e)
Jupiter moves 778.6 mkm in (687 solar days) or (671 mars oration period)
And
Jupiter moves 671 mkm in (592 solar days) or (580 mars oration period)
And
Jupiter moves 629 mkm in (555.7 solar days) or (542 mars oration period)
30. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
30
II- Discussion
- The data tells us some interesting puzzled story, let's explain it in following:
- Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 24.6h (Mars rotation period) a distance 1.16
mkm - But
- Jupiter orbital circumference (4900 mkm) be designed geometrically base on this
distance 1.16 mkm and by that 4900 mkm =1.16 mkm x 4224
- Where , 4222.6 hours = Mercury Day Period, So If
- 4224 be equal 4222.6,
- In this case
- Jupiter orbital circumference be created based on a geometrical design takes into
consideration these 2 cycles periods (24.6 h and 4222.6 h)
- I created no data here, I just arrange it… Planets data be created (almost) based on
this arrangement. That means, the circumference (4900 mkm) in fact be created
based on these 2 cycles periods
- Please Note
- Even if there's an explanation for this data- we should not discuss it here – because
we have a discovery we should know it it's a real one because
- 4900 mkm = Jupiter orbital circumference, and HWY this distance be created
depends on the 2 cycles periods
- I wish I do my job correctly… the data is made of pure gold and I'm afraid that I'm
stupid and covers the data brightness
- The distance 4900 mkm be created in proportionality with the 2 cycles (24.6 h and
4222.6 h) BUT, BY Using Jupiter Motion Velocity
- The using of the cycles (24.6 h and 4222.6 h) in Jupiter orbital circumference
design isn't so strange using of data made far from Jupiter motion and the numbers
be found here by chance. The cycles (24.6 h and 4222.6 h) takes Jupiter velocity in
consideration.
- The paper dedicates a point to analyze Jupiter orbital circumference (point no.8)
31. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
31
Equation (3-4-a)
1.16 mkm =13.1 km/sec x 24.6 h x 3600 sec.
Equation (3-4-b)
4900 mkm = 1.16 x 4224
- These 2 equations tell the story. Equation no (3-4-a) shows that Jupiter motion
distance 1.16 mkm in 24.6 h (mars rotation period).
- Equation no (3-4-b) shows that Jupiter orbital circumference (4900 mkm) be
designed based 1.16 mkm and 4224 (where 4222.6h = Mercury day period)
Equation (3-4-c)
4900 mkm = 199.2 mkm x 24.6
- 199.2 mkm = Jupiter motion distance during Mercury day period (4222.6h)
- 24.6 h = Mars Rotation Period
- 4900 mkm = Jupiter Orbital Circumference
- This equation we discuss with the distance 720.7 mkm analysis –
- Let's explain what we do in following
- Jupiter orbital circumference be analyzed in a separated point no.(8)
- Mars rotation period be analyzed in the next point because of its so effective role
in motions data – we try to why the number (24.6) be used so frequently with
Jupiter motion
- The next point (No. 4) we analyze Mercury Motion during its day period –because
the period 4222.6 h is the second point on which Jupiter orbital circumference
deepens - so with Mercury Motion analysis we discuss the equation no. (3-4-c)
but the other equations we discuss in Jupiter orbital circumference analysis point
(8)
32. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
32
Equation (3-4-d)
4900 mkm = 0.406 mkm x 12104 = 0.384 mkm x 12756
- Where
- 0.406 mkm = Earth moon Distance At Apogee Radius
- 0.384 mkm = The Earth Moon Orbital Distance.
- 12014 km = Venus Diameter
- 12756 km = Earth Diameter
- Equation no.(3-4-d) shows that, Jupiter orbital circumference effect on the
distances between the moon and Earth by the proportionality to Earth and Venus
diameters –
- This idea should be a correct one – because we have seen frequently that – Planet
orbital distance is defined almost as a function in its diameter – by that to define
the distance between the moon and Earth based on Venus and Earth diameters it's
logical idea –
- More analysis we should discuss in Jupiter orbital circumference analysis (point
no.8)
- Notice
- 4900 mkm = The Sun Diameter x The Moon Diameter (error 1%)
- The data tries to show that Jupiter orbital circumference be designed geometrically
as we should discuss later.
- Also
- We notice that 1 hour of Venus = 19.27 hours of Jupiter and based on that
4331days (Jupiter orbital period) =19.27 x 224.7 days (Venus orbital period). The
data shows more connections between Venus and Jupiter
33. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
33
3-5 Mars Rotation Period Analysis
I- Data
(3-5- a)
Mars moves during (84 solar days) a distance = 174.9 mkm
But
174.9 solar days = 4197.8 hours (this period is less than 4222.6 h with 24.8 h)
(3-5- b)
Mars moves during (4222.6 h) a distance = 366.3 mkm = π x 116.6 mkm
(3-5- c)
Mars moves during (366.3 solar days) a distance = 763.4 mkm = π x 243 mkm
(760 s x 0.3 mkm/sec = 227.9 mkm = Mars Orbital Period)
(3-5- d)
Mercury moves during (4222.6 h) a distance = 720.7 mkm = Mars Motion Distance
During (346.1 solar days)
(3-5- c)
Mars moves during (329.9 solar days) a distance = 687 mkm
(3-5- d)
Mercury moves during (84 solar days) a distance = 344 mkm
(3-5- e)
(672 mkm/ 84 mkm) = 196.8 seconds /24.6 seconds
(3-5- f)
720.7 mkm = 4.095 mkm/day x 175.94 day = 4.197 mkm x 171.7
(3-5- g)
654.9 x 24 h =24.6h x 639
Notice
4222.6 = 193 x 21.8
2550973 km = 116750 km x 21.8
344 = 4.095 x 84 = 3.91 x 88
34. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
34
II- Discussion
- In this point we try to know why mars rotation period (24.6 h) is used frequently in
Jupiter and Mercury motions data
- Because of that, we try with this period (24.6 h) by different analysis forms of data
- The point is that
- Mercury and Mars Motions have some (specific) harmony and because of that
their motions causes some (similar effect) or (proportional effect)
- Many examples can show that, let's discuss one in following:
- During 5040 seconds
- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves a distance = 2 x Saturn diameter (error -1%)
- Mars (24.1 km/s) moves a distance = Saturn diameter (error +1%)
- Another example
- Mercury during its rotation period (1407.6 h) moves a distance = 243mkm (1%)
- Mars during Venus day period (2802 h) moves a distance = 243 mkm
- Venus Day Period = 2 x Mercury Rotation Period (error 0.4%)
- I want to say that,
- Mars rotation period (24.6 h) effect on Jupiter and mercury cycles periods isn't a
unique effect but there are many other similar effects can be discovered where
these effects together tell that a geometrical mechanism be found behind this data
creation and specifically there's a geometrical mechanism behind Mars rotation
period creation.
35. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
35
Equation No. (3-5-a)
Mars moves during (84 solar days) a distance = 174.9 mkm
But
174.9 solar days = 4197.8 hours (this period is less than 4222.6 h with 24.8 h)
- Equation no. (3-5-a) tells, Mars during 84 days moves a distance = 174.9 mkm
- Mercury day period =175.94 solar day, if 1 solar day = 1 mkm, that will result the
following…
- The distance 174.9 mkm will be equivalent to 174.9 solar days = 4197.8 h
- Mercury day period = 4222.6 hours
- The difference 4222.6 hours – 4197.8 hours = 24.8 hours
- This period (24.8 h) is different from Mars rotation period (24.6 h) with (0.8%)
- For now we consider both values are equal,
- Equation no. (3-5-a) tries to find a deep connection between Mercury Day Period
and Mars Rotation Period …we do that because of the equation in the previous
discussion which told (4331 days = 2π x 687 days = 175.94 days x 24.6). we try
to know why Mars rotation period (24.6 h) be used so frequently with Mercury
Day Period and Jupiter Motion Data.
- Based on this equation
- Mars rotation period (may be) created as a function in Mercury Day Period
- The point is that,
- The relationship between Mercury and Mars isn't clear
- The relationship between Jupiter and Mercury be so clear
- But
- Mars is a puzzled point…
- Equation no. (3-5-a) tells us that, There's some reason for a relationship between
Mercury Day Period and Mars Rotation Period regardless Jupiter Motion!
36. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
36
Equations No. (a, b and c) Respectively
Mars moves during (84 solar days) a distance = 174.9 mkm
And
Mars moves during (175.94 days) a distance = 366.3 mkm = π x 116.75 mkm
And
Mars moves during (366.3 solar days) a distance = 763.4 mkm = π x 243 mkm
- Where
- 4222.6 hours = Mercury Day Period
- 116.75 days = Venus Day Period
- 243 days = Venus Rotation Period
- We have a series of motions depend on one another and passed distances (all of
them) be used as periods of time based on the same rate (1mkm = 1 solar day)
- The fighting is useless
- The opponent will tell that (the data be created based on pure coincidence) and I
will say (NO there's a geometrical reason behind) but he has no proof for his (pure
coincidence claim) and I don't know the geometrical reason based on which the
data be created….
- And
- Because no help is available, the rich data will be removed without explanation
because of the weak knowledge.
- This data is created based on a geometrical reason… we have examples, let's
provide some of them in following
Example
- Mercury moves during its rotation period (1407.6 h) a distance = 243 mkm (1%)
- Venus moves during its day period (2802 h) x 2 a distance = 706 mkm
- Mars moves during Venus Day8 Period (2802 h) a distance = 243 mkm
- Where
- 243 days = Venus Rotation Period 706 days = π x 224.7 days (= Venus Orbital Period)
37. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
37
- The planets move distances and used them as periods of time
- This fact is proved frequently spite we can't catch how that's happened
- Many questions are left behind
- For example
- If Mars moves during (116.75 solar days) another distance (in place of 243 mkm
move 260 mkm)
- In this case Venus rotation period will be changed into 260 mkm or still be 243
mkm?
- I want to say
- The solar system is a machine of gears. Its motion depends on the gears motion but
the geometrical rules which controls this motion are unknown and because of that
we see the data but don't understand.
38. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
38
Equation No. (3-5-e)
(672 mkm/ 84 mkm) = (196.8 seconds /24.6 seconds) = 8
- Where
- 671 mkm = Venus Jupiter Distance
- 84 mkm = Mars Original Orbital Distance
- 24.6 hours = Mars Rotation Period
- During 196.5 (Mars rotation periods) Jupiter moves a distance =227.9 mkm =
Mars Orbital Distance.
- Notice. Mars migration theory tells that Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm
and had migrated to it current one 227.9 mkm.
- Equation no.(3-5-e) tells that,
- Mars rotation period 24.6 h (may be) created because of Mars orbital distance
(227.9 mkm)
- Means
- Mars had migrated from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its current one
(227.9 mkm), and the migration process almost needed Mars rotation period to be
=24.6 hours. I mean some geometrical reason behind forced to create Mars rotation
period to be =24.6 hours!
- But
- The basic value in the Equation is the value (671)
- Because 671 h (of Mercury motion) = 687 solar days (of Jupiter motion) = 109
solar days (of Mars motion)…
- And
- During 671 h Mercury moves 2 x 57.2 mkm (Mercury orbital distance 57.9 mkm)
(1%)
- During 687 days Jupiter moves 778.6 mkm = Jupiter orbital distance
- During 109 days Mars moves 227.9 mkm = Mars orbital distance
39. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
39
Equation No. (3-5-f)
720.7 mkm = 4.095 mkm/day x 175.94 day = 4.197 mkm x 171.7
- Where
- 720.7 mkm = Mercury Jupiter Distance
- 4.095 mkm /day = Mercury Velocity Per A Solar Day
- 4.197 mkm = Mercury Motion Distance during (24.6 hours)
- 170 mkm = Mercury Mars Distance (error 1% with 171.7)
- 24.6 hours = Mars Rotation Period
- The interesting information is that,
- Mercury Day period (175.9) is used in part 1 of the equation but in place of it the
distance between Mars and Mercury be used (170) in the equation part 2
- We know that the distances be used as periods of time so, if Mercury day period
175.94 solar day be used as 175.94 mkm that will be understandable
- But
- It's interesting to use the distance between Mars And Mercury (170 mkm) in place
of Mercury Day Period
- The point is that, Mercury uses of Mars rotation periods changed the distance from
4.095 mkm to 4.197 mkm and that changed the period 175.94 to 171.7
- But
- What does that mean?
- Let's write some concluded answer in following
- We know, Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance
(=84 mkm) and had migrated to its current orbital distance (227.9 mkm) with a
distance 170 mkm from Mercury.
- The equation tells us, Mars had migrated from its original position but Mercury
controlled this migration and didn't permit for Mars to be at a distance more far
than 170 mkm from Mercury
40. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
40
- Means,
- Mercury controlled Mars Migration process and didn't let the distance with Mars to
be more than 170 mkm.
- This motion and distance depend on Mercury Day Period
- Notice
- The equation tells the distance (170 mkm = Mercury Mars Distance) depends on
the distance (720.7 mkm = Mercury Jupiter Distance)
- More data can support our analysis
41. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
41
MORE DATA
(1)
- (Mercury day period 4222.6 h / Mars rotation period 24.6 h) =171.7
- (Mercury rotation period 1407.6 h / Mars rotation period 24.6 h) =57.27
- Where
- 171.7 mkm is different from Mercury Mars Distance (170 mkm) with 1%
- 57.2 mkm is different from Mercury Orbital Distance (57.9 mkm) with 1%
(2)
- Light known velocity (0.3mkm/s) moves during 193 sec a distance 57.9 mkm
- Light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) moves during 196.5 sec a distance 227.9
mkm
- Where 196.5 sec is different from 193 sc with 2%
- 57.9 mkm = Mercury Orbital Distance
- 227.9 mkm = Mars Orbital Distance
- Notice
- (Mars Mass / Mercury Mass) = 0.514
- And
- 360 degrees /687 days = 0.524
- The difference between (0.514) and (0.524) is around 2%
- But, If we accept these values are equal (for now)
- That may tell how Mercury control Mars motion because the rate 0.524 expresses
Mars Motion Daily and that define Mars daily motion distance and if Mars Cycles
periods be interacted with Mercury cycles periods that define obligatory Mars
orbital distance. And by that Mercury define the point to which Mars could
migrate and couldn't move beyond it.
42. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
42
MORE DISCUSSION
- The previous data tries to show that, a deep connection is found between Mercury
an Mars motions – this connection effect is seen on Jupiter motion by the equation
(4331 days =2π x 687 days =175.94 days x 24.6), but
- This connection is found between Mercury and Mars motions originally, even this
connection controlled Mars Migration process…
- I hope I do my job correctly,
- Because
- The puzzle be raised because of this equation (4331 days =2π x 687 days =175.94
days x 24.6) and we have tries to explain why these cycles periods are rated with
each other…
- But now
- We have more tenths of data shows more connections between the 2 same planets,
I claim there's a geometrical reason behind and the (pure coincidences of numbers)
is a wrong claim if any one try to raise because we have tenths of directed data
which express of the 2 planets motions. And
- If I can't catch the geometrical reason of mechanism behind this data creation that
shouldn't effect negatively of this data force.
- I want to say that,
- Mars rotation period isn't the only piece of data effective strongly on the 3 planets
motions but there are many other basic players of data and all of them tells loudly
that the data be created based on geometrical mechanism and these planets motions
be done depends on one another and in proportionality with one and other and that
means, if any planet of these 3 planets be absent the other planets will change their
motion or even suffer from more great damage – we here don't deal with separated
moving rigid bodies – we deal with one building and each planet is a part of this
same building – it's one machine of gears and any gear stops will effects greatly on
all other gears motions.
43. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
43
Equation No. (3-5-g)
654.9 x 24 h =24.6 h x 639
- Where
- 654.9 mkm = Jupiter Saturn Distance
- 639 mkm = (629 mkm /929mkm) x 940 mkm
- 24.6 h =Mars Rotation Period
- But
- Jupiter moves during 639 days a distance 723.25 mkm (= 720.7 mkm)
- Saturn moves during 654.9 days a distance 550.7 mkm (= Mars orbital distance)
- The equation basic value is 639 days or (639 mkm) because Jupiter moves during
this period (639 days) distance = 723 mkm where Mercury moves during its day
period a distance =720.7 mkm = Mercury Jupiter distance
- The equation tells that, the periods (654.9 and 639) are rated based on Mars
rotation period – but the period 639 days has a value because of the distance 720.7
mkm – means we can't see why this equation is important unless w understand
why Jupiter needs the period 639 days? And Jupiter needs it to pass a distance
=720.7 mkm
- Shortly
- We need to discuss Mercury motion for the distance 720.7 mkm for better
understanding– we Discuss Mercury Motion in the next point (no. 4)
- Notice
- (629 mkm /929mkm) x 940 mkm
- 629 mkm= Earth Jupiter Distance
- 929 mkm= Earth Jupiter Distance (when the 2 planets be on the sun 2 sides)
- 940 mkm = Earth Orbital Circumference
- That tells the distance 639 mkm is created based on Earth Jupiter Distance
44. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
44
4- Mercury Motion Distance During Its Day Period
4-1 Preface
4-2 Why Mercury Jupiter Distance =720.7 mkm?
4-3 Pluto Motion For A Distance =720.7 mkm
4-4 Jupiter Motion In A Comparison With Light Motion
45. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
45
4-1 Preface
- Mercury moves during its day period a distance =720.7 mkm
- In this point we choose 3 planets motions for the distance 720.7 mkm – these
planets are Mercury, Jupiter and Pluto
- Mercury moves 720.7 mkm in a period =4222.6 h = Mercury day period
- Jupiter moves 720.7 mkm in a period = 637 solar days = 622 Mars rotation periods
- Pluto moves 720.7 mkm in a period = 1775 solar days
- The data discussion will show the importance of these planets motions
- But
- I want to say that,
- Matter is created out of light, as a result the solar planets move accompanying with
light motion –
- When we discuss the light motion effect on planets motions we will discover that
the light beam started from Mercury to Jupiter and then to Pluto –
- Means,
- I have choose these 3 planets because of the light motion effect on them, but here
we don't discuss the light motion and I try to show that the planets motions data be
created depends on one another by analysis this and without any outer idea -
- Shortly
- The 3 planets motions choice will be more clear with light motion discussion – but
here we try to show that – the planets motions data be created dependently on one
another.
46. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
46
4-2 Why Mercury Jupiter Distance =720.7 mkm?
I - Data
(4-2-a)
Mercury moves during its day period (4222.6 h) a distance =720.7 mkm
(4-2-b)
Mercury day period =2 Mercury orbital period = 3 Mercury rotation period
(4-2-c)
Jupiter moves during Mercury day period (4222.6 h) a distance =199.2 mkm
(4-2-d)
(240 mkm/158 mkm) =(88 days /58.65 days) (error 1.2%)
II – Discussion
Equation no. (4-2-d)
(240 mkm/158 mkm) =(88 days /58.65 days) (error 1.2%)
- Where
- 240 mkm = Mercury Motion Distance during its rotation period (1407.6 hours)
- 158 mkm = π x 50.3 mkm (Mercury Venus Distance)
- 88 days = Mercury Orbital Period
- 58.65 days = Mercury Rotation Period
- Let's remember the question?
- Why Mercury Jupiter Distance =720.7 mkm? We have 2 reasons …. one reason is
related to Mercury Motion and the other is related to Jupiter motion.
47. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
47
- (1st
Point Mercury Motion)
- Mercury Day period 4222.6 hours = 2 x Mercury orbital period 2112 hours, and
- Mercury Day period 4222.6 hours = 3 x Mercury rotation period 1407.6 hours…
- And
(I)
- Mercury moves during its rotation period a distance = 240 mkm (which is related
to Mercury Venus Distance) with the rate (1.5= Mercury orbital period / Mercury
rotation period).
- Means, Mercury Motion distance during its rotation period is related to Mercury
Venus Distance (it's related to Venus Basically because 243 days = Venus rotation
period)
(II)
- Mercury moves during its orbital period a distance = 360 mkm (Mercury orbital
circumference). (means this motion is related to Mercury Position)
(III)
- Mercury moves during its day period a distance = 720.7 mkm= Mercury Jupiter
distance
- By that
- Mercury has 3 cycles
- By its rotation period creates a connection with Venus (the most inner planet to it)
- By its orbital period does its revolution around the sun
- By its day period creates a connection with Jupiter (the nearest outer planet to it)
- There's some geometrical design on which Mercury moves
- And if this idea is a correct one, we can conclude simply that, Mercury has to
move a distance = 720.7 mkm= Mercury Jupiter distance by using on of its cycles
periods (and of course no better choice than Mercury Day Period)
- Geometrically, if Mercury connects with Venus by its motion during rotation
period, So mercury should connect with Jupiter with its day period.
48. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
48
- If this description is a correct one, the question should be (why mercury day be
=4222.6 h) and this question we discuss in Jupiter orbital circumference analysis.
- Notice
- Mercury Venus distance is multiplied by (π) and then the rate (1.5)… while
Mercury Jupiter distance (720.7) be used directly… that because Mercury day
period is a period = (1 period) but mercury orbital period (0.5 period) and Mercury
rotation period be (1/3 Period). That means, the fractions be found with (orbital
and rotation periods) while day period uses the integer number… So the rates of
periods be seen in the distances.
49. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
49
- (2nd
Point Jupiter Motion)
- Mercury Jupiter Distance =720.7 mkm = Mercury Motion distance during Mercury
day period (4222.6 h).
- But
- Jupiter moves during Mercury day period (4222.6 h) a distance = 199.2 mkm
- Because
- 720.7 mkm is Mercury Jupiter Distance, both planets may interest for this same
distance and we have seen that Mercury moves during its day period 720.7 mkm
and the question – Why Jupiter doesn't take the distance 720.7 mkm into account
in its motion?
- In fact Jupiter motion takes into consideration the distance 720.7 mkm,
- But the geometrical mechanism is hard for me to catch, let's refer to its data in
following:
- Jupiter moves during Mercury day period (4222.6 h) a distance = 199.2 mkm
- But
- 199.2 mkm x π = 629 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance)
- And
- (629 mkm /929 mkm) = (637 mkm/ 940 mkm)
- Where
- 629 mkm = Earth Jupiter Distance
- 929 mkm = Earth Jupiter Distance when the 2 planets be on the sun 2 sides
- 940 mkm = Earth Orbital Circumference.
- 637 mkm = The Required Distance
- Jupiter moves during 637 days a distance = 720.7 mkm
- Based on that, Jupiter motion for 199.2 mkm causes its motion for 720.7 mkm,
means, some connection is found between the 2 motions
- Notice, this explanation can be more clear when we compare Jupiter motion with
light motion –we do that in point no. (4-4) for better explanation for this motion.
50. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
50
4-3 Pluto Motion For A Distance =720.7 mkm
I- Data
(4-3-a)
0.3 mkm/sec x 5906 seconds = 1775 mkm
(4-3-b)
0.406 mkm /day x 1775 days = 720.7 mkm
(4-3-c)
2.574 mkm /day x 687 days = 1775 mkm (error 0.3%)
(4-3-d)
0.406 mkm /day x 4331 days = 1775 mkm (error 1%)
(4-3-e)
90560 days x 2 = 1775 days x 101
But
37100 mkm x 2 = 720.7mkm x 103
(4-3-f)
0.3 mkm/sec x 2390 second = 717 mkm (error 0.5%)
(4-3-g)
(1775/346.6) =(24.1/4.7) = 5.14
(4-3-h)
30589 days = 1775 days x 17.2
(4-3-i)
(929 km/542 mkm) = (3030 mkm/1775 mkm)
51. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
51
II- Discussion
Equation no. (4-3-a)
0.3 mkm/sec x 5906 seconds = 1775 mkm
Equation no. (4-3-b)
0.406 mkm /day x 1775 days = 720.7 mkm
Equation no. (4-3-c)
2.574 mkm /day x 687 days = 1775 mkm (error 0.3%)
Equation no. (4-3-d)
0.406 mkm /day x 4331 days = 1775 mkm (error 1%)
- Where
- 0.3 mkm/sec = light known velocity
- 5906 mkm = Pluto Orbital Distance
- 0.406 mkm/day = Pluto Velocity Per A Solar Day
- 2.574 mkm/day = Earth Velocity Per A Solar Day
- 687 days = Mars Orbital Period
- 4331 days = Jupiter Orbital Period
- 720.7 mkm = Mercury Jupiter Distance
- We discuss these 4 equations together, Because one idea be seen in them, let's
write this idea directly in following…
- 1 hour of Mars Motion = 2π hours of Jupiter Motion
- And
- 1 hour of Earth Motion = 2π hours of Pluto Motion
- These rules we have discussed before deeply and frequently
- The question is (How The Rate 2π Be Transported?)
- The period 1775 days (or the distance 1775 mkm) is the method to do that,
52. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
52
- Earth moves during (687 days Mars orbital period) a distance = 1775 mkm =
Pluto Motion distance during (4331 days = Jupiter orbital period)
- By this equality of distances, the rate of time (2π) be transported from (Jupiter and
Mars motions) to (Earth and Pluto motions)
- The value (1775) tells us this information clearly, let's with it in following:
- Our interest point is the distance 720.7 mkm and we ask about (how many day
Pluto needs to pass 720.7 mkm? The answer is 1775 solar days)
- But
- The value 1775 mkm be passed by 3 motions
- Light (0.3 mkm/sec) motion during 5906 seconds
- Earth (2.574 mkm/day) motion during (687 days)
- Pluto (0.406 mkm/day) motion during (4331 days)
- We know that
- Light motion = (2π) Planet motion (will be discussed in Part no. II)
- If we use this rule, so
- 5906 mkm = (2π) x 940 mkm or 5906 seconds = (2π) x 940 seconds
- Where
- 5906 mkm = Pluto Orbital Distance
- 940 mkm = Earth Orbital Circumference
- Shortly
- The value 1775 shows a comparison between light and planet motions – we will
discuss this idea clearly in the next point (4-4)
53. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
53
Equation no. (4-3-e)
90560 days x 2 = 1775 days x 101
But
37100 mkm x 2 = 720.7mkm x 103
- Where
- 90560 days = Pluto Orbital Period
- 37100 mkm = Pluto Orbital Circumference
- 720.7 mkm = Mercury Jupiter Distance
- The rates 101 and 103 are different with 2% (we should later explain the
geometrical rule of the error 2%)
- For now we consider the 2 rates (101 and 103) are equal
- Equation (4-3-e) tells that, while Pluto orbital circumference be created as a
function in the distance (720.7 mkm) (Mercury Jupiter Distance), also Pluto orbital
period be created as a function in the period 1775 days which Pluto needs to pass
the distance (720.7 mkm).
Equation no. (4-3-f)
0.3 mkm/sec x 2390 second = 717 mkm (with 720.7 mkm error 0.5%)
- Where
- 2390 km =Pluto diameter
Equation no. (4-3-g)
(1775/346.6) =(24.1/4.7) = 5.14
- Where
- 346.6 days = The Nodal Year
- 24.1 km/s = Mars velocity
- 4.7 km/s = Pluto velocity
54. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
54
Equation no. (4-3-h)
30589 days = 1775 days x 17.2
- Where
- 30589 days = Uranus Orbital Period
- 17.2 hours = Uranus Day Period
- 1774 days = our point of discussion
Equation no. (4-3-i)
(929 km/542 mkm) = (3030 mkm/1775 mkm)
- Where
- 929 mkm = Earth Jupiter Distance when the 2planets be on 2 different sides
from the sun
- 3030 mkm = Uranus Pluto Distance
- Notice
- 346.6 seconds x 0.3 mkm/sec = 104 mkm
- 346.6 seconds x 1.16 mkm/sec = 2 x 201 mkm
- 346.6 days x 4.095 mkm /day = 1419 mkm
- Notice
- The basic idea behind this data may be as following:
- Pluto Orbital Distance (5906 mkm) be defined based on Mercury Jupiter Distance.
- That means, the light motion created Pluto orbital circumference by using Mercury
Jupiter distance as a measurement - But
- We know that, the light used the distance 100733mkm as a measurement
- That means,
- The distance 100733 mkm should be created as a function in the distance 720.7
mkm (means the 2 distances should be connected geometrically)
- 100733 mkm = 720.7 mkm x 139.8
- Pluto moves during 346.6 days a distance = 140.7 mkm
- That tells the nodal year (346.6 days) plays an important role here but what's it?
55. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
55
- Notice
- Why The Error 2% Doesn't Effect Negatively On The Discussion?
- as we have seen before
- Earth moves during its day period a distance = 2.574 mkm (100%)
- Pluto moves during its day period a distance = 2.593 mkm (101%)
- The moon displacements total during (29.53 days) = 2.598 mkm (102%)
- The moon apogee orbital circumference = 2.550 mkm (99%)
- The previous data is an example for this system which is used frequently in
different planets motions data
- I want to say that
- For some geometrical necessities, the solar system geometrical design created
categories of data on 3 levels each one is different with 1%
- I don't know why
- But the error 1% I have found regularly and in order case – so this order of data is
an example of many similar orders – let's provide another one in following
- 17.4 degrees = the inner planets orbital inclinations total
- 17.2 degrees = Pluto orbital inclination (error 1% )
- And
- 23.6 degrees = the outer planets orbital inclinations total
- 23.4 degrees = Earth Axial Tilt
- I want to say that,
- The error 1% or 2% be found for geometrical necessity – so when we find it we
should not remove the data for that
- But, notice
- I mean the rates 1 % or 2% ONLY but NOT 1.4%, 1.5%, 1.6% or 1.7%.......etc
- All these rates are errors in measurements. The geometrical design aim only 1% or
2%.
56. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
56
4-4 Jupiter Motion In Comparison With Light Motion
I - DATA
(4-4-a)
4222.6 = 2π x 671
But
0.3 mkm /sec x 671 s = 201 mkm (light moves during 671s a distance 201 mkm)
13.1 km/s x 4222.6 h x 3600 s = 199.2 mkm (Jupiter moves 199.2 mkm)
(4-4-b)
4900 mkm = 0.3 mkm/sec x 16333 seconds
(4-4-c)
4900 mkm = 1.16 mkm/sec x 4224 seconds
(4-4-d)
4900 mkm = 199.2 mkm x 24.6
(4-4-e)
24.6 = (1.16/0.3) x 2π (error 1.2%)
(4-4-f)
(10747 x 24)/24.6 = 10485 = (4331 x 24)/ 9.9 h
(4-4-g)
(10747 /4331) =(24.6/9.9) = (24.1/9.7) = (17.4/7) =2.48
57. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
57
II – Discussion
Equation no. (4-4-a)
4222.6 h = 2π x 671 h
- Where
- 4222.6 h = Mercury Day Period
- 671 mkm =Venus Jupiter Distance
- But
- Light known velocity (0.3 mkm /s) during 671 s moves a distance (201 mkm)
- Jupiter (13.1 km /s) during 4222.6 h a distance (199.2 mkm) (error 1%)
- Where 4222.6 hours =Mercury Day Period
- The equation tells, Jupiter moves during Mercury day period (4222.6 h) a distance
= 199.2mkm = light motion distance during 671 seconds (671= 4222.6 /2π)
- We should notice that
- We deal with strict geometrical design, and no mistake is allowable
- Light known velocity (0.3mkm/sec) moves during 671 seconds a distance 201
mkm. We consider that light motion is the master one here
- Light motion effects on planet motion with the rate (2π) and both motions pass
equal distances based on this rate
- But
- 1 second of light motion = (2π) hours of Jupiter motion
- This is the rule we should keep in mind
- 1 second of light motion = 1 hour of planet motion but with the rate (2π) between
the passed distances. Means if the distances be equal so 1second be = (2π) hours
and if 1second be = 1hour the passed distance will not be equal but rated with this
rate (2π).
- Notice
- The rate (2π) rule we discuss in part (2) of this paper, but the rule 1 second = 1
hour isn't the general one, because the general one is 1 second = 1 day, but Jupiter
58. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
58
here uses a part of this rate and we try to analyze its motion to see the depth behind
this rate.
- The conclusion is
- 1 second of light motion = (2π) hours of Jupiter motion
- We should see that as clear as possible
- Light does the motion at first, that means, we don't deal here with (720.7 mkm) but
we deal with light motion for a distance (201 mkm)
- This distance (201) will give a birth for planets motions distance (720.7 mkm) but
the distance (201 mkm) is the original one.
- Light And Jupiter Move Equal Distances
Equation no. (4-4-d)
4900 mkm = 199.2 mkm x 24.6
- Where
- 199.2 mkm = Jupiter motion distance during Mercury day period (4222.6 h)
- 24.6 hours = Mars Rotation Period
- How to understand this hard equation (3-2-d)? we have to analyze more deep Mars
rotation period, let's try to do that in following
Equation no. (4-4-e)
- 24.6 = (1.16/0.3) x 2π (error 1.2%)
- Where
- 1.16 mkm/sec = light supposed velocity
- 0.3 mkm/sec = light known velocity
- Equation no. (4-4-e) tells a great information that, Mars rotation period is a point
inside which light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) interacted or cohered with
light known velocity (0.3mkm/ec)!
- We can't accept such great conclusion based on one simple equation, we have to
go to mars and examine if its motion be related in this same conclusion
59. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
59
- MORE DATA
(1)
- (300000 km /24.1 km) = (120536 km/9.7 km)
- Light known velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) / Mars velocity 24.1 km/sec = Saturn
diameter 120536 km / Saturn velocity for 1 second.
(2)
- 1160000 km = 24.1 km/sec x 48133 seconds
- Saturn (9.7km/s) moves during 48133 seconds a distance = 466556 km= Jupiter
motion distance during Jupiter day period = Neptune motion distance during a
solar day.
- But
- Saturn (9.7km/s) moves 300000 km during a period 30589 seconds (error 1%)
(30589 days = Uranus Orbital Period)
- Saturn (9.7km/s) moves 1160000 km during a period 120536 seconds (error 0.8%)
(120536 km = Saturn diameter)
- But
- (120536 /30589) = 3.94 but (1h of Mercury motion =3.91 h of Mars Motion)
- How to understand this data?
- The interaction between light known velocity (0.3 mkm/s) and light supposed
velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) be done in Saturn motion, and Saturn transports its
motion to Mars where the interaction between the 2 light beams velocities be seen
in Mars rotation period – that explains why Mars rotation period is so important as
such.
Equation no. (4-4-f)
(10747 x 24)/24.6 = 10485 = (4331 x 24)/ 9.9 h
Equation no. (4-4-g)
(10747 /4331) =(24.6/9.9) = (24.1/9.7) = (17.4/7) =2.48
- 10747 days = Saturn Orbital Period
60. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
60
- 4331 days = Jupiter Orbital Period
- 9.9 hours = Jupiter Day Period
- 24.6 hours = Mars Rotation Period
- 24.1 km/s = Mars Velocity
- 9.7 km/s = Saturn Velocity
- 17.4 deg = the inner planets orbital inclinations total
- 7 deg = Mercury orbital inclination.
Additional Equation no. (1)
10 x 10747 days x 24 h = 10.7 h x 2 x 120536 = 2579280 hours - Let's remember
- (1)
- Saturn (0.838 mkm /daily) moves during 120536 days a distance =100733mkm =
the distance be passed by light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) during one solar
day (where 120536 km = Saturn Diameter)
- (2)
- The moon (2.4 mkm/ daily) moves during 10747 days a distance =25920mkm =
light known velocity (0.3 mkm/s) motion distance during a solar day. And
Additional Equation no. (2)
- 1433.5 mkm (Saturn Orbital Distance) = 17.75 mkm x (511.1 /2π)
- 17.75 mkm= the planets motions distances total per a solar day (this total contains
the moon velocity per a solar day 2.57 mkm = Earth velocity because they aren't
separated from one another)
- 511 deg = The Planets Axial Tilts Total
61. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
61
- Notice
-
- Let's try to explain how this paper works
-
- In Paper Part (I) we analyze The Solar Planets Data to prove that, The soalr system
description inherited from Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken
description and we have to replace it with another one –
- In this part we face the data analysis without any new explanation, while we try to
prove that the data can't be explained by Newton Theory.
- This process is done in the first (10) Points of this paper
- In points no. (11) and (12),
- I provide the solar system creation theory by which the planets motions data be
explained –
- As a result this data can be more clear in the discussion of Part (II) of this paper –
- I provide Jupiter Motion Data in Comparison with light motion as example for the
discussion found in part no. (II) of this paper.
- I try to show – our current reading for planets motions data will be changed in the
solar system creation theory because the theory supposes that a light beam moves
accompanying with the planets motions and effect on tier motions data –we here
see example of this discussion.
62. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
62
5- Planets Unified General Motion
5-1 Preface
5-2 The Planets Unified General Motion Description
5-3 The Solar Planets Motions Are Complementary One Another
5-4 The Solar Planets Move An Unified Motion (A Team Motion)
63. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
63
5-1 Preface
- In point no. (3-2) we have discussed some of Mercury, Mars and Jupiter motions
data to prove that these 3 planets don't move independent motions.
- This part of data we repeat here again
- and
- we add to it another part of data (Planet 8 days cycle)
- I put all data together to show, the planets motions can't be done independently. On
the contrary, the planets motions data be done dependently on one another –
- The new part of data shows one more feature proves that the planets motions can't
be independent and by that, a huge number of data supports the claim (Planet
Motion Be done depending on other planets motions)
64. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
64
5-2 The Planets Unified General Motion Description
- I suppose that (The Planets Motions Create One Unified General Motion)
- This hypothesis tells the planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also It tells the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- The hypothesis discovers One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary
with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result,
The Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
- The Solar Planet creates its data to be in consistency with its motion.
- The planet can't change its motion, but can change its data to be in consistency
with its motion. And the planet data be created in consistency with its motion.
- Because the planet motion be complementary with other planets motions.
- The planet data be created complementary with other planets data
- Based On This Vision
- The solar planets data be created complementary to other planets data and based
on that the planets data be created depends on One Geometrical Design.
- And
- The Planets Creation And Motions Data Be Controlled By One Equation Only
Notice
- We discuss again a part of the 3 Planets Motions data because we add more data
and extensive discussion for it (The 3 planets are Mercury, Mars and Jupiter)
65. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
65
5-3 The Solar Planets Motions Are Complementary One Another
I-Data
(The Interaction between Mercury, Mars and Jupiter)
(No. 1) (Mercury and Mars Motions)
- Mercury moves during its day period (4222.6 h.) a distance = 720.7 mkm
- Mars moves during (2802 hours) a distance = 243 mkm
- Mercury moves during (1407.6 hours) a distance = 243 mkm (error 1%)
- Mars moves during 346.6 d. a distance =720.7 mkm (Mercury Jupiter Dis.)
- Mercury moves during 346.6 d. a distance =1419 mkm (with 1433 error 1%)
- Mars moves during 687 d. a distance = 1433 mkm (Mars orbit. Circum)
- Mercury moves during 687 d. a distance =2815mkm (Mercury Uranus Dis.)
- Mars moves during 4331d. a distance = 9010mkm (Saturn orbit. Circum)
- Mercury moves during 4331d. a distance = 2815 mkm x 2π
- Mars moves during 224.7 d. a distance = π x 149.6 mkm (Earth orb. Dis)
- Mercury moves during 224.7 d. a distance = 920 mkm (with 928 error 1%)
- Mars moves during 365.25 d. a distance = π x 243 mkm (0.5%)
- Mercury moves during 365.25 d. a distance = 2 x 748 mkm
- Mars moves during 5040s. a distance= 121464 km= Saturn Diameter (+1%)
- Mercury moves during 5040s. a distance= 238896 km= 2 Saturn Diameters (-1%)
Where
1407.6 h = Mercury Rotation Period 2802 h = Venus Day Period
346.6 days = the nodal year 224.7 days = Venus orbital period
687 days = Mars Orbital Period
4331 days = Jupiter orbital period = 2π x 687 days
66. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
66
(No. 2) (Mars And Jupiter Motions)
- Mars moves during 636.7 days a distance =1325 mkm= (Venus Saturn Dis.)
- Jupiter moves during 636.7 days a distance =720.7 mkm
- Mars moves during 687 d. a distance= 1433 mkm= Mars Orbital Circumference
- Jupiter moves during 687 d. a distance= 778.6 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Distance
- Mars moves during 4331d. a distance= 9010 mkm= Saturn orbital circumference
- Jupiter moves during 4331 d. a distance= 4900 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Circum.
- Mars moves during 778.6 d. a distance = 1622 mkm = Uranus Neptune Dis.
- Jupiter moves during 778.6 d a distance= 881 mkm =58 days x 15.19 mkm.
- ( 15.19 mkm = the 9 solar planets motions distances total per a solar day).
- Notice
- 2.082 mkm / day x 778.6 days = 1622 mkm = 1.1318 mkm /day x 1433 days
67. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
67
(No. 3) (Mercury And Jupiter Motions)
- Mercury moves during 687 d. a distance= 2815 mkm= Mercury Uranus Distance
- Jupiter moves during 687 d. a distance= 778.6 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Distance
- Mercury moves during 1433 d. a distance =5848 mkm= Mercury Pluto Dis.
- Jupiter moves during 1433 d a distance =1622 mkm=Uranus Neptune Dis.
- Mercury moves during 4331d. a distance= 2815 mkm x 2π
- Jupiter moves during 4331 d. a distance= 4900 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Circum.
- Mercury moves during 4222.6 h a distance = 720.7 mkm
- Jupiter moves during 4222.6 h a distance = 200 mkm = 629 mkm/π
- Mercury moves during 550.7 d a distance = π x 720.7 mkm (0.4%)
- Jupiter moves during 550.7 d a distance = 629 mkm (error 1%)
Please Remember,
Data Group No. (1)
- Mars moves during 687 d. a distance= 1433 mkm= Mars Orbital Circumference
- Mars moves during 4331d. a distance= 9010 mkm= Saturn orbital circumference
- Mars moves during 4331 x π d a distance= 28255 mkm= Neptune orbital circumference
Data Group No. (2)
- Mercury moves during 687 d. a distance= 2815 mkm= Mercury Uranus Distance
- Mercury moves during 4331d. a distance= 2815 mkm x 2π
Data Group No. (3)
- Jupiter moves during 687 d. a distance= 778.6 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Distance
- Jupiter moves during 4331 d. a distance= 4900 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Circum.
68. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
68
II-Discussion
- The planets move defined distances in defined periods of time.
- The Defined Distance means a distance is known in the solar system, as to be any
planet orbital distance or a distance between any 2 planets.
- The Defined Periods Of Time means a period of any planet cycle, as 365.25 days
(Earth orbital period) or any planet orbital period. Or any planet rotation period or
any planet day period. All these periods are defined periods of time
- The argument tells that
- If the solar planets move their motions independently from one another, based on
that, the planets motions during defined periods of time should pass (random)
distances. Because these Planets are independent in their motion from one
another. (For example) Mercury motion depends on its orbital period (88 days) and
doesn't interest neither for Mars orbital period (687 days) nor for Jupiter orbital
period (4331 days) and by that, Mercury during these periods (687 days and 4331
days) should move some random distances (not defined in the solar system
distances).
- The data disproves Planet Motion Independency Concept. because the (3)
planets move defined distances in defined periods of time. These planets motions
aren't independent from one another. These motions are done based on One
Geometrical Design. And these motions be are similar to Chess Board Pieces
Motions. Each Motion is calculated geometrically and be obligatory.
69. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
69
- Notice
- The previous analysis of motions prove the interactions of motions among the
three planets (Mercury, Mars and Jupiter). These interactions we have referred to
them during our analysis for Jupiter orbital circumference (4900 mkm).
- The 2 parts of discussions can provide a clear vision for how the planet motion be
done. Because the planets motions data help us greatly and protect us from any
imaginary vision. Because of that, the motions interaction which we have
concluded based on the planets data analysis concerning Jupiter orbital
circumference be proved here clearly by the 3 planets motions analysis
- It's simply a fact
- If the geometrical machine based on which this data be created be discovered the
reasons will be known to answer how or why these motions have interactions.
- But even before this machine discovery the data shows the motions interactions in
both sides. In the planets data and in the planets motions.
70. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
70
5-4 The Solar Planets Move An Unified Motion (A Team Motion)
- Let's Summarize The Proof Idea In Following:
- This proof depends on 2 planets motion cycles are discovered later. Which are
(planet 8 days cycles) and (planet 6 days cycles). We study one Cycle only in this
paper because both cycles provide the same argument.
- The Cycle Shows That Different Planets Motions Be Used In The Same One
Cycle To Create One Final Result.
- Means,
- Many planets move relative one another to create one result.
- For Example
- Jupiter moves a distance (A) and Uranus moves a distance (B).
- The different distance between (A) and (B) = Jupiter Diameter
- Now
- The machine uses this behavior frequently, and (the different distance = Jupiter
Diameter) be created frequently while the cycle uses its different periods (8 days,
16 days, 24 days….etc).
- Based on that,
- We can't consider these planets motions are independent from one another because
the different distance be defined by the 2 planets motions. we have to consider
these planets motions as a team motion. They move relative to one another which
proves The Unified General Motion Concept.
- Based on that,
- (Planet 8 and 6 Days Cycle) disproves Planet Independent Motion Concept.
- In following we study Planet 8 Days Cycle
71. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
71
(Planet 8 Days Cycle)
(I)
- Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during its day period (9.9 h) a distance = 466884 km
- But
- 466884 km = 449197 km (Jupiter Circumference) + 17687 km
- Where
- (8 x 17687 km = 141496 km (Jupiter Diameter) (error 1%)
- Based on that, we have concluded that, Jupiter has a cycle of 8 days
- Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 8 Jupiter days (79.2 h) a distance = 3735072 km
- (3735072 km= 8 Jupiter circumferences + 141496 km (Jupiter diameter) (1%)
(II)
- The distance 3735072 km be passed also by Saturn and Neptune with a rate 80%
depends on one another as following:
- Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during 10 Saturn days (107 h) a distance = 3736440 km
- (10 Saturn Circumferences = 3786750 km, the difference =50310 km = Uranus
Diameter error 1.5%)
- Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 12 Neptune days (193.2 h) a distance = 3755808
km
- (24 Neptune Circumferences = 3734323 km, the difference =21485 km = Mars
Circumference (error 0.6 %))
(III)
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during Pluto day period (153.3 h) a distance = 3752784
km
- The distance 3752784 km = Jupiter motion distance during 8 days + 17687 km
- And because
- 17687 km x (8) = 141496 km (Jupiter Diameter) (error 1%)
- That tells another Cycle is found between Uranus and Jupiter based on 8 Pluto
days
72. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
72
- That means, the distance be passed by Uranus during 8 Pluto days equal the
distance be passed by Jupiter during 64 Jupiter days and equal the distance be
passed by Saturn during 80 Saturn days and equal the distance be passed by
Neptune during 100 Neptune days
Let's see that in following
(1)
Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during (64 Jupiter days) a distance =29880756 km
(2)
Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during (80 Saturn days) a distance =29891520 km
(3)
Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during (100 Neptune days) a distance =31298400 km
(4)
Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during (8 Pluto days) a distance =30022272 km
Comments
- Uranus motion distance (30022272 km) – Jupiter motion distance (29880756 km)
= 141496 km (Jupiter Diameter)
- The differences between these distances are less than 1 % (generally) and based on
that we can't consider they are different distances but we have to consider they are
equal distances.
- Although still there are small differences which are found for geometrical reasons
for example the difference between Jupiter and Saturn motions distances =
29880756 km – 29891520 km = 10921 = the moon circumference
- The data shows Planets Motions Dependency, because the different distances are
defined geometrically and that means these aren't 2 different distances of 2 plants
independent motions. On the contrary, the 2 distances are planned geometrically
and the 2 planets are 2 players to perform one different distance.