Giant-Impact Hypothesis Supports "Mars Immigration Theory"
•
0 likes•507 views
THE GIANT-IMPACT HYPOTHESIS suggests that Luna (the Moon) formed from the ejecta of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planetesimal, approximately 4.5 billion years ago, in the Hadean eon (about 20 to 100 million years after the Solar System coalesced).[1] The colliding body is sometimes called Theia, from the name of the mythical Greek Titan who was the mother of Selene, the goddess of the Moon.[2] Analysis of lunar rocks, published in a 2016 report, suggests that the impact may have been a direct hit, causing a thorough mixing of both parent bodies.[3] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant-impact_hypothesis) The Giant- impact hypothesis supports my theory of "Mars Immigration" Shortly - Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm, and because of an earthquake in the solar system Mars had immigrated from it to its new orbital distance 227.9 mkm And during this motion - Mars had collided With Venus At First And Then With Earth At End - Mars passed after the collision and didn't adhered with the Earth -instead – Mars collisions caused some debris to be thrown only - The main point here is that – Mars motion direction was from the Point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars in this motion was impacted by a great force that means all Mars collisions occurred during this motion caused its debris to be thrown In The Same Motion Direction and because of that the debris followed Mars to its new orbital distance but because Earth Mass is Greater than Mars the debris moved around Earth creating the Earth Moon. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
![IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory"
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
2nd
Course Student–Physics Department
Physics & Math Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Moscow – Russia -2010-2013
Contacts TEL +201022532292
mrwaheid@gmail.com
Ms. Svetlana Budochkina
A Mathematics Analysis Teacher
Physics & Math Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Moscow – Russia
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt – 21st
March 2020
Abstract
The Giant-impact hypothesis suggests that Luna (the Moon) formed from the ejecta of
a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planetesimal, approximately 4.5
billion years ago, in the Hadean eon (about 20 to 100 million years after the Solar
System coalesced).[1] The colliding body is sometimes called Theia, from the name
of the mythical Greek Titan who was the mother of Selene, the goddess of the
Moon.[2] Analysis of lunar rocks, published in a 2016 report, suggests that the impact
may have been a direct hit, causing a thorough mixing of both parent bodies.[3]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant-impact_hypothesis)
The Giant- impact hypothesis supports my theory of "Mars Immigration"
Shortly
- Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm, and because of an earthquake in the solar
system Mars had immigrated from it to its new orbital distance 227.9 mkm
And during this motion
- Mars had collided With Venus At First And Then With Earth At End
- Mars passed after the collision and didn't adhered with the Earth -instead –
Mars collisions caused some debris to be thrown only
- The main point here is that – Mars motion direction was from the Point 84
mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars in this motion was impacted by a great
force that means all Mars collisions occurred during this motion caused its
debris to be thrown In The Same Motion Direction and because of that the
debris followed Mars to its new orbital distance but because Earth Mass is
Greater than Mars the debris moved around Earth creating the Earth Moon.
References
Jupiter And Venus Motions Interaction https://vixra.org/abs/2003.0357
Mars Orbital Distance Is Changed Through History http://vixra.org/abs/1910.0509
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/giant-impacthypothesissupportsmarsimmigrationtheory-200321145535/85/Giant-Impact-Hypothesis-Supports-Mars-Immigration-Theory-1-320.jpg)
Recommended
Uranus position in the sky
Abstract
Uranus and Neptune are perpendicular on Saturn level
i.e. Saturn Orbital Distance locates at horizontal level with all planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn) – let's call it (Saturn level)
Uranus and Neptune are on vertical level related to Saturn level - let's call it ( Uranus level)
So Uranus level is perpendicular on Saturn level
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar Group
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar Group?
Abstract
Paper Claim
- The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken!
Paper question Explanation
- The solar system is one machine and built on one geometrical design – Perfectly – the solar system is similar to a chess board. Not only the planets data be created based on geometrical measurements and calculations but also the solar system distances be created in a network form. That means, every point in the solar system is defined based on one geometrical design.
- The chess board is the best example for the solar system design. If we accept this idea – 2 results will be produced
- (1st Result)
- The Refutation For Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity. That's why Nobel Prize Decision 2021 is mistaken. Because
- Newton theory gives clear meaning that, each planet moves independently and no geometrical design be found before the solar system creation. Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is built on the big bang hypothesis tells (the universe be created by some random process) – this is the basic point against Newton – because he told wrong theory and pushed us to think in the wrong direction of thinking.
- Shortly
- There was a design found before the solar system creation and the planets and distances data be created according to this design. That shows Newton theory is so far from the truth.
- Nobel Prize decision for physics 2021 has to create the revolution against Newton theory and description. Where no real progress in the solar system motion understanding during centuries be done because of it. and even the big bang theory be refuted as a proof that we do no progress- that creates the responsibility on the decision makers shoulders and they should face the history evaluation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Light And Planet Motions Interactions (I)
Paper Question
Why the moon synodic month (29.53 days) is increased by 2.23 days on the moon sidereal month (27.3 days)?
(The moon word means the Earth Moon where the paper deals with no other moon)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Machine Moves Completely Different From Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The solar planets move by a force different completely from The Sun Mass Gravity. Newton Theory is created out of imagination
Paper Hypothesis
The Inner Planets Move By An Electric Field
The Outer Planets Move By The Transportation Of Motion From the inner planets.
These facts are proved by the following 5 proves:
(1) Planet Motion Depends On Its neighbor Planet Motion And Not On The Sun
(2) The Outer Planets Motions are distinguish from the inner planets motions in their geometrical features. Which proves that both types of motions can't be created by the same one force.
(3) The Distances Equality in the solar system proves that planet motion doesn't depend on the sun gravity force, on the contrary it depends on Its neighbor planet motion. (Appendix no. 1)
(4) The solar planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion. this unified motion be similar to the train carriages motion. and the unified general motion proves that Planet motion depends on Its neighbor planet motion and not on the sun.
(5) The Planets Motion Dependency shows a clear trajectory of energy passes through the solar system. This energy trajectory starts from the inner planets to Jupiter to Uranus to Pluto and then to Neptune and again to the inner planets. The energy trajectory proves that planet motion depends on Its neighbor planet motion and not on the sun.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc) this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024 kg also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from 6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii)
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found? (Newton is Wrong) (II)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planet Moves BY Light Motion
Paper hypothesis explanation
- The basic question in the solar system motion is (Do we understand the planets real positions?)
- Newton Theory tells Planet moves by the sun mass gravity force, can that be real? Of course not –Why? because
- The planets motions data show effects of Planets masses gravities on one another - for example – The moon be created by the Earth gravity –that shows an effect of Earth gravity on the moon creation and motion – based on that – Earth gravity effect be seen in the moon creation and motion data – on the other side – No any planet data refers to the sun gravity effect on it?
- Earth gravity is an example of Planets gravities effects on one another where the planets data show clearly that, But no planet data refers to any effect of the sun gravity on it! Why? What options we have to solve this dilemma?
- (a) Can we suppose that the sun mass is an imaginary one and not fact? Or
- (b) Can we suppose that the sun be in some position prevents its gravity effect on the planets motions? to make this question more clear let’s ask –
- Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance. Let's ask (Are the Sun, Saturn and Uranus be on one line with an angle 180 degrees or 90 degrees?) Can the planets positions create a distinguish in The Mass Gravity Using?
- But if no sun gravity be found why the planets revolve around the sun? we have discussed this question before(Part No. I)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Neptune Motion Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance
- This fact tells, if Uranus and Earth velocities be equal, while Uranus revolves around the sun one complete revolution Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 complete revolutions (19.2 years) - But
- The Earth moon moves a cycle called Metonic Cycle extends for 19 years. this fact creates a puzzle because Earth Cycle is 4 years only (365+365+365+366 =1461 days) and by that the Earth itself doesn't know about Metonic Cycle –
- The question be (How does the moon move Metonic Cycle if Earth doesn't?)
- The answer is …
- Uranus motion effects on the moon motion and caused the moon to move Metonic Cycle (19 years) – Simply, Metonic Cycle is the result of Uranus Motion effect on the moon motion.
- Now, Why The Nobel Prize Decision For Physics 2021 Is Mistaken?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021
Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Abstract
Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Paper question Explanation
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance 84 mkm but Pluto was the mercury moon revolves round it.
- There was one more planet found at a distance 71 mkm from the sun.
- Mars was collided with this planet and destroyed it. as a result
- Mars and Pluto were migrated from their original orbital distances.
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to its current position (227.9 mkm) and through its displacement, Mars had collided with Venus and Earth and caused the Earth moon creation. based on this story, Mars itself had collided with Earth and caused the moon creation (not the ancient plant theia)
- The planets migration were done before the sun creation and caused serious negative effect on the solar system. that explains how Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken where the sun is created after all planets creations and motions. so how the sun can be the planets motions reason?
- How can I know this data?
- By Using The Planets Motions Data Analysis.
- The solar system is created as one machine, and the planets and their distances be distributed geometrically in a network form. by that the planets migration caused registered changes in the solar planets motions data.
- Again
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
- Because
- While Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken clearly, and contradicts the planets motions data. and while Newton theory which is lived since 400 years prevented any real progress in the solar system understanding, and while tenths of papers be written against Newton theory and its negative effects on the solar system general understanding.
- And while, tenths of papers and thousands of pages be written with hundreds of questions and contradictions against the negative effect of Newton theory...
- The Nobel Prize Decision 2021 sees nothing of that. We are again be under Newton theory umbrella. No logic they have in their decision but by force they forced to remove the correction in the physics book. And then for one more year the physics teachers over Earth will teach the lies of Newton and every student have to learn!
- The Decision Is Mistaken
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Recommended
Uranus position in the sky
Abstract
Uranus and Neptune are perpendicular on Saturn level
i.e. Saturn Orbital Distance locates at horizontal level with all planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn) – let's call it (Saturn level)
Uranus and Neptune are on vertical level related to Saturn level - let's call it ( Uranus level)
So Uranus level is perpendicular on Saturn level
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar Group
Is There An Absent Planet In The Solar Group?
Abstract
Paper Claim
- The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken!
Paper question Explanation
- The solar system is one machine and built on one geometrical design – Perfectly – the solar system is similar to a chess board. Not only the planets data be created based on geometrical measurements and calculations but also the solar system distances be created in a network form. That means, every point in the solar system is defined based on one geometrical design.
- The chess board is the best example for the solar system design. If we accept this idea – 2 results will be produced
- (1st Result)
- The Refutation For Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity. That's why Nobel Prize Decision 2021 is mistaken. Because
- Newton theory gives clear meaning that, each planet moves independently and no geometrical design be found before the solar system creation. Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is built on the big bang hypothesis tells (the universe be created by some random process) – this is the basic point against Newton – because he told wrong theory and pushed us to think in the wrong direction of thinking.
- Shortly
- There was a design found before the solar system creation and the planets and distances data be created according to this design. That shows Newton theory is so far from the truth.
- Nobel Prize decision for physics 2021 has to create the revolution against Newton theory and description. Where no real progress in the solar system motion understanding during centuries be done because of it. and even the big bang theory be refuted as a proof that we do no progress- that creates the responsibility on the decision makers shoulders and they should face the history evaluation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Light And Planet Motions Interactions (I)
Paper Question
Why the moon synodic month (29.53 days) is increased by 2.23 days on the moon sidereal month (27.3 days)?
(The moon word means the Earth Moon where the paper deals with no other moon)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Machine Moves Completely Different From Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The solar planets move by a force different completely from The Sun Mass Gravity. Newton Theory is created out of imagination
Paper Hypothesis
The Inner Planets Move By An Electric Field
The Outer Planets Move By The Transportation Of Motion From the inner planets.
These facts are proved by the following 5 proves:
(1) Planet Motion Depends On Its neighbor Planet Motion And Not On The Sun
(2) The Outer Planets Motions are distinguish from the inner planets motions in their geometrical features. Which proves that both types of motions can't be created by the same one force.
(3) The Distances Equality in the solar system proves that planet motion doesn't depend on the sun gravity force, on the contrary it depends on Its neighbor planet motion. (Appendix no. 1)
(4) The solar planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion. this unified motion be similar to the train carriages motion. and the unified general motion proves that Planet motion depends on Its neighbor planet motion and not on the sun.
(5) The Planets Motion Dependency shows a clear trajectory of energy passes through the solar system. This energy trajectory starts from the inner planets to Jupiter to Uranus to Pluto and then to Neptune and again to the inner planets. The energy trajectory proves that planet motion depends on Its neighbor planet motion and not on the sun.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc) this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024 kg also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from 6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii)
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found? (Newton is Wrong) (II)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planet Moves BY Light Motion
Paper hypothesis explanation
- The basic question in the solar system motion is (Do we understand the planets real positions?)
- Newton Theory tells Planet moves by the sun mass gravity force, can that be real? Of course not –Why? because
- The planets motions data show effects of Planets masses gravities on one another - for example – The moon be created by the Earth gravity –that shows an effect of Earth gravity on the moon creation and motion – based on that – Earth gravity effect be seen in the moon creation and motion data – on the other side – No any planet data refers to the sun gravity effect on it?
- Earth gravity is an example of Planets gravities effects on one another where the planets data show clearly that, But no planet data refers to any effect of the sun gravity on it! Why? What options we have to solve this dilemma?
- (a) Can we suppose that the sun mass is an imaginary one and not fact? Or
- (b) Can we suppose that the sun be in some position prevents its gravity effect on the planets motions? to make this question more clear let’s ask –
- Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance. Let's ask (Are the Sun, Saturn and Uranus be on one line with an angle 180 degrees or 90 degrees?) Can the planets positions create a distinguish in The Mass Gravity Using?
- But if no sun gravity be found why the planets revolve around the sun? we have discussed this question before(Part No. I)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Neptune Motion Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance
- This fact tells, if Uranus and Earth velocities be equal, while Uranus revolves around the sun one complete revolution Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 complete revolutions (19.2 years) - But
- The Earth moon moves a cycle called Metonic Cycle extends for 19 years. this fact creates a puzzle because Earth Cycle is 4 years only (365+365+365+366 =1461 days) and by that the Earth itself doesn't know about Metonic Cycle –
- The question be (How does the moon move Metonic Cycle if Earth doesn't?)
- The answer is …
- Uranus motion effects on the moon motion and caused the moon to move Metonic Cycle (19 years) – Simply, Metonic Cycle is the result of Uranus Motion effect on the moon motion.
- Now, Why The Nobel Prize Decision For Physics 2021 Is Mistaken?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021
Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Abstract
Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Paper question Explanation
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance 84 mkm but Pluto was the mercury moon revolves round it.
- There was one more planet found at a distance 71 mkm from the sun.
- Mars was collided with this planet and destroyed it. as a result
- Mars and Pluto were migrated from their original orbital distances.
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to its current position (227.9 mkm) and through its displacement, Mars had collided with Venus and Earth and caused the Earth moon creation. based on this story, Mars itself had collided with Earth and caused the moon creation (not the ancient plant theia)
- The planets migration were done before the sun creation and caused serious negative effect on the solar system. that explains how Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken where the sun is created after all planets creations and motions. so how the sun can be the planets motions reason?
- How can I know this data?
- By Using The Planets Motions Data Analysis.
- The solar system is created as one machine, and the planets and their distances be distributed geometrically in a network form. by that the planets migration caused registered changes in the solar planets motions data.
- Again
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
- Because
- While Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken clearly, and contradicts the planets motions data. and while Newton theory which is lived since 400 years prevented any real progress in the solar system understanding, and while tenths of papers be written against Newton theory and its negative effects on the solar system general understanding.
- And while, tenths of papers and thousands of pages be written with hundreds of questions and contradictions against the negative effect of Newton theory...
- The Nobel Prize Decision 2021 sees nothing of that. We are again be under Newton theory umbrella. No logic they have in their decision but by force they forced to remove the correction in the physics book. And then for one more year the physics teachers over Earth will teach the lies of Newton and every student have to learn!
- The Decision Is Mistaken
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The sun obliquity disproves newton theory of the sun mass gravity
The Sun Obliquity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun obliquity on ecliptic (7.25 degrees) proves that, Earth Is Found Before The Sun Creation.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The paper hypothesis tries to disprove Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- While Newton told us, The Sun Is The Planet Motion Reason, the paper hypothesis tells, Earth is found and moving before the sun creation. as a result, we conclude that, Earth Motion Doesn't Depend On The Sun.
- This conclusion be valid for all solar planets. Means, Newton Theory of The sun mass Gravity is mistaken.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Copernicus-Kepler Model Modification:
Copernicus-Kepler Model Modification:
1- The sun is on the vertical level relative to the Earth.
2- All solar planets are found on the horizontal level relative to the Earth
3- The Sun is higher than the Earth, and higher than all solar planets
4- The straight line from the Sun to the Earth is the main line in the solar group
5- The planets revolve around this line, and not around the sun herself..
6- i.e. the Planets revolve around the line connected between the Sun and the Earth…
7- That means when the planet revolve around the sun, he will revolve around the Earth also because both of them connected by this same one line
8- That's why, the Ptolemy model lived very long time, because it was correct
9- So if the planet revolve around the sun or around the Earth the result will be the same, because both of them contributed to create the main line in the solar group
10- And because the sun is higher than the Earth, we see the sun hesitating motion to forward and backward with angle 63.7 degrees yearly, as a circle motion
11- So the sun circle motion is NOT true, but resulted from our wrong vision for the sun motion…
12- I claim, the planets from the Earth to Pluto move toward the sun, but Mercury and Venus move in the reverse direction
13- The Earth daily displacement toward the sun = 1 km
14- The previous modification can give us some explanation for the Egyptian astronomical phenomenon 2737, in which Mercury, Venus and Saturn were perpendicular on the Earth on 3/12/2012 (on the three Egyptian pyramids heads - appendix No.1),
15- Which proves, that the planets Not only revolve around the sun but also revolve around the Earth, supports this modification.
The solar planets motions description
The Solar Planets Motions Description
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Create One Unified General Motion.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The Solar Planets Motions Can be Similar to The Train Carriages Motions
- Or
- The Solar Planets Motions Can be Similar to The Chess Pieces Motions.
- Each Planet motion be defined to be complementary with other planets motions.
- The complementary motions be integrated one another and create One Unified General Motion.
- The Planets Motions General harmony is produced by the unified general motion.
- Each Planet motion can be considered as an obligatory motion defined for this planet by The Planets Unified General Motion.
- Each Planet Data be created in consistency with its motion. and because the planet motion be defined obligatory, Each planet data be defined as a result.
- The solar planets data be created complementary with each other because their motions be complementary with each other. that means no planet data can be created independently from the other planets data.
- Based on this vision
- The solar planets data be created based on One Geometrical Design
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Paper hypothesis
Saturn moves by a velocity = 0.99 c (where c = 300000 km per second)
Saturn almost moves by light velocity, and this high velocity motion creates relativistic effects in the solar system data
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Again
- I claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021, because
- Saturn moves by light velocity, and
- No planet moves by the sun mass gravity, because, the matter is created out of light and moves with its parent light by using different rates of time. As a result, the solar planets motions use different rates of time, and by using these different rates of time, Saturn can travel by a velocity = 99% of light velocity (300000 km/s)
- Shortly
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken, and tenths of papers provided huge number of proves against this theory – now – the theory lived for 400 years spite its an imaginary idea and wrong in its principle - But
- The Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021 sees nothing of all that! they provide no help for any real progress in the solar system motion understudying. They save the wrong theory of Newton spite the planets data contradicts it frequently
- This paper provides one more feature of planets real motion disproving Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity – and providing a claim against the decision 2021–
- No one has the right to mislead the humanity to learn the lies in place of the real knowledge and facts. No one has the authority and no can face the responsibility of all human misleading and misguiding
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found, (newton is wrong)
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found (Newton is Wrong)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
Paper hypothesis proves
Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Is Wrong Because
(1) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Transported Among The Planets
(2) The Solar Planets Motions Data Shows A Continuum Effect Through The Planets Motions
(3) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
(4) The Solar System Distances Be Created In One Network Form
(5) The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion.
(The sun is the planets motions result and not the reason)
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is a wrong theory. And we should remove it from the physics book. The previous proves are discussed in the paper. And they are decisive proves against the theory.
- Of course if the sun be created after all planets creation Newton theory be refuted clearly. But the historical records difficulties will prevent such proof by all means. For that reason we can't depend on this very good proof in our fighting against Newton theory.
- But
- We still have one more decisive proof against Newton which can kill this theory clearly and remove it at end from the physics book. This proof is the continuum effect of the solar planets motions data.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
- Where
- Planet Motion Features Prove Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- Many new features are discovered in the solar planets motions among which:
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
- The previous features disprove Planet Motion Independency Concept inherited by Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity- the features simply gives us a different vision about the solar system motion.
- Instead of the rigid body moving by the sun mass gravity independently from other rigid bodies in creation and motion data, The Solar Planet be a similar to a point on one trajectory of energy. where the solar planets move together one unified motion as train carriages transporting among the planets the motion with the rates of time making the solar system as a great Clock its input one motion creates (one second) and its output another motion creates (one solar day).
- And the 2 motions depend on one another as 2 gears in one machine of gears.
- Can this vision be a fact?
- I claim Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is created out of imagination basically because the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
- How can I prove my idea against Newton theory?
- By Planets Motions Data Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar System Geometrical Design depends on Mars and Pluto Motions
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The Solar Group is a machine of gears and each planet motion be used as a gear in it, the planets motions be integrated one another and create one unified motion.
- This vision tells, the solar system distances must be created as a network designed geometrically based on the planets positions and motions.
- The vision makes the solar group as a train and the planets as carriages in one train
- Accordingly, Planet motion can't be independent from the others'
- The dependency of motions among the planets depends on the planets motions periods, because each planet creates its own rate of time to perform the integration among the planets motions to create the planets unified general motion.
- Based on this vision, each planet position and motion data be defined in comparison with the other planets positions and data. As a result, the planets motions be similar to chess board pieces motions. each motion depends on the others and be calculated geometrically
- The vision disproves The Sun Mass Gravity Of Newton, and also Planet Motion Independency Concept which is inherited of Newton theory, because it tells the solar system moves by one geometrical design creates the planets data and motions.
- And
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury, and Pluto was the Mercury Moon.
- Some great strike caused Mars and Pluto to migrate from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
- By the planets migration, the solar system distances network be confused and needed a repair and by that, the solar system design takes Mars and Pluto as the basic 2 points to redesign the solar system distances Network
- The solar system design caused to create new 2 Planets (The moon and Saturn), to support the solar system redesign process.
Paper Objective
- The paper explains the solar system design, proving that Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken (this discussion be the paper part No. (II) under the title "The Solar System Creation Theory")
- The paper explains the changes be occurred by Mars and Pluto migration in the solar system design, proving the planets migration event (Part no. (I) of this paper under title (The Solar System Design Description)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter And Mercury Motions Analysis
Paper Arguments
- The paper provides 2 basic arguments
- (1st Argument)
- The Paper disproves Newton Theory of The sun mass gravity and proves that the solar planets motions can't be independent motions from one another but each planet motion depends on other planets motions.
- This discussion concludes that, the solar system distances be created in a network form, integrated together in one geometrical design.
- The argument conclusion is (The solar planet move one unified general motion)
- The 1st Argument Depends On (Jupiter Motion Analysis)
- (2nd Argument)
- The Paper claims that the solar planets motions be accompanying with a light beam motion which provides the required energy for the planets and their distances creation (because matter is created of energy and space is created of energy)
- The light motion accompanying with the solar planets motions cause the planets to move one unified general motion.
- The 2nd Argument Depends On (Mercury Motion Analysis)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.2)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Light Velocity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Light Velocity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- A Light Beam It Velocity=1.16 mkm/s Be A Companion With Mercury Motion.
The hypothesis explanation
- The hypothesis supposes that, the solar planets and their distances be created out of a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
- The hypothesis is a complex one because we need (at first) to prove that, there's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s.
- How can this hypothesis disprove Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity?
- The hypothesis supposes that, the solar group be created out of one light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s and the planets creation and motion data registers this light beam velocity because it's their source of energy.
- But
- The sun light velocity =300000 km.
- Means, this light beam (0.3 mkm/s) is created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s). and that proves the claim (The Sun is Created after all solar planets creation and motion) which disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass Gravity.
Paper objective
- The paper proves The light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Can Earth Motion effect on Pluto Motion?
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Pluto And The Moon Motions Are Effected By The Earth Motion.
The hypothesis Explanation
- I use the planets data analysis to discover the solar planets creation and motions.
- The planets data shows the following fact….
- Pluto Day Period be =153.3 hours because Pluto day period depends on The Earth moon day period (708.7h). That explains why Pluto day period is so long in comparison with the outer planets days periods. The fact is that, Pluto day period is created as a function in the Earth Moon Day Period.
- On the other side, the moon orbital apogee radius which should be = 413600 km became =406000 km because of Pluto motion effect on the moon orbital motion.
- Paper Objective
- Because no physics theory can give an explanation for such dependency found between 2 small masses planets which are at a huge distance between them, I have to prove this dependency between the 2 planets by all means. And as a result for these proves, we have to search after the method by which this dependency can be created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.3)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun is created after all solar planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun mass gravity decisively
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The paper analyzes the solar planet motion and compares it with Newton theory..
- Many new features be discovered and attributed to the planet motion and these features disprove also Newton theory in addition to the sun age theory.
1. Let's provide a list of these new discovered features in following:
2. The Solar planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion - By that the planets motions be similar to a machine of gears.
3. The Solar planets revolutions around the sun be done in equal periods of time
4. The Solar planets motions use different rates of time - by that the solar planets motions be similar to a great mechanical clock.
5. The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form. By that the solar system distances be similar to a chess board, each planet moves depending on the other planets motions and by using geometrical calculations
6. Mars and Pluto had migrated from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised) (2)
Paper hypothesis
-The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
-The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
-The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
-Because
-The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
-Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
-The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions rates of time be defined by using ONE RULE
- Based on the planets motions rates of time, the planets orbital periods and distances be defined. means,
- Based on this One Rule, the solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined.
- If the solar planets motions be independent from one another, how their orbital periods and distances be defined based on one rule only?
- The paper provides a proof that, the planets motions use different rates of time which proves that, the solar planets move one unified general motion. means,
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another and created one unified general motion, because of that, the planets motions need to use different rates of time to enable their motions to be integrated into one unified general motion.
- This fact changes the solar system description inherited from Newton theory of the sun mass gravity. The solar planets be similar to carriages in one train move together one unified motion. also the solar group can be similar to a mechanical clock, and the planets be similar to the gears of this clock. Each gear does one motion (and creates one rate of time) and these motions be integrated into one unified gnarl motion (and the rates of time be integrated into one unified general rate of time)
Paper objectives
- The paper provides the rule based on which all solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined, and test all planets motions data to prove that, no planet motion contradicts this rule.
- The paper tries to answer the question (why the solar planets use different rates of time) by providing The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory.
- The paper is divided into 2 parts.
- (1st Part) Provides the rule and its proves discussion
- (2nd Part) Provides The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III)
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
The Solar System Motion Depends On A Light Beam Motion
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar system motion depends on a light beam motion.
The hypothesis explanation
- There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec in the solar system
- The solar system is created out of this light beam energy. The light energy creates The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances
- Based on this vision
- The solar system motion depends on this light beam motion.
- As a result
- This light beam effects are seen frequently in the planets motions data. because the planet is similar to a puppet on the puppets theater, the light motion is the main player behind and by that the light moves by using planets motions data and the light motion effects on these planets motions data.
- The hypothesis tells another universe be found behind the universe of matter and the important news is that, the hidden universe causes the matter universe motion.
- By that, the solar planets don't move by the sun mass gravity. The solar planets are similar to ships found on a sea they move by this sea waves. Where the sea is the light motions, because of that the light motions define the planets motions range and creates their motions data.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves the light motion existence behind the planets motions and proves also that the light motion cause the planets motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Solar planets order disproves the gravity theory
Abstract
- The Solar Planets order proves that, the planet orbital distance is defined based on his Diameter and NOT his Mass, which disproves the Gravity Theory..
But
- Planet Diameter and Orbital Distance Relationship Equation is so hard to define…! Why?
Because
- The solar Group has 2 Heads (The Sun and Earth).
The Solar Group is A Dipole….
We need to modify the Solar Group Basic Description to be " A Dipole System"…
- This paper also discusses the Sun nature and Origin…
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (III)
The Giant-impact hypothesis suggests that, The Earth Moon is formed from the ejects of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planet…etc
I suggest the following theory:
- Mars itself had collided The Earth and not another planet. how that is happened?
- Mars original orbital distance =84 mkm, and Mars had to move from it to its new orbital distance =227.9 mkm – i.e. - Mars had to move from 84 mk to 227.9 mk.
- Through Mars motion – Mars had collided Venus (at first) and Earth (at Second)
- Mars had moved pushing by a strong force from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and that caused the collisions debris (and ejects) to move with Mars in the same motion –
- Venus has no Moon –because the debris had to move with Mars in the same motion, But because Earth Mass is greater than Venus & Mars and because the debris lost their high motion momentum, Earth could controlled some of these debris and created its moon by them – the rest debris still moved with Mars
- Mars could attract its 2 small moons from these debris
How to prove this story? By 3 following questions:
(1st question) Was Mars Original Orbital Distance = 84 mkm really? how to prove?
(2nd question) Is Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) an unique motion?
(3rd question) What are the results which prove this motion occurrence?
These questions will be discussed– but let's summarize the (3rd question) Answer:
Mars Immigration Results:
1- Mars Diameter Decreasing
2- The Asteroid Belt Creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (II)
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm from the sun and Mars had a force pushed it to change its original orbital distance to it’s a new one 227.9 mkm.
-Means Mars had moved from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) from the sun
-Mars during its motion from the point (84 mkm) to (227.9mkm)– Mars had collided with Venus (at First) and then collided with Earth (at second)
-These collisions caused some debris – and Mars had moved to complete its journey to its new orbital distance at point 227.9 mkm from the sun under the same force which caused its motion.
-Because of Mars Motion Direction, the debris can't stay around Venus and that explains why Venus has no moon – but because Earth has a greater Mass than Mars and because the debris lost their high momentum of motion – Earth could attracted some of these debris and created the Earth Moon
-This story is proved by Mars Motion Direction where this motion direction is the same direction of the solar system basic energy Motion which we have analyzed under the title "Jupiter Energy"
-Now because Mars Motion and Jupiter Energy Motion, Both are in the same direction – for that reason both are truth
-So the motion direction is from the point (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) to the sun- and that shows the direction of Motion.
-Now the collisions debris moved with Mars in the same direction and Earth could use some debris to created its moon but the rest of debris are attracted by Jupiter itself by which Jupiter created some of Jupiter rings or Asteroid belt
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
More Related Content
What's hot
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The sun obliquity disproves newton theory of the sun mass gravity
The Sun Obliquity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun obliquity on ecliptic (7.25 degrees) proves that, Earth Is Found Before The Sun Creation.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The paper hypothesis tries to disprove Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- While Newton told us, The Sun Is The Planet Motion Reason, the paper hypothesis tells, Earth is found and moving before the sun creation. as a result, we conclude that, Earth Motion Doesn't Depend On The Sun.
- This conclusion be valid for all solar planets. Means, Newton Theory of The sun mass Gravity is mistaken.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Copernicus-Kepler Model Modification:
Copernicus-Kepler Model Modification:
1- The sun is on the vertical level relative to the Earth.
2- All solar planets are found on the horizontal level relative to the Earth
3- The Sun is higher than the Earth, and higher than all solar planets
4- The straight line from the Sun to the Earth is the main line in the solar group
5- The planets revolve around this line, and not around the sun herself..
6- i.e. the Planets revolve around the line connected between the Sun and the Earth…
7- That means when the planet revolve around the sun, he will revolve around the Earth also because both of them connected by this same one line
8- That's why, the Ptolemy model lived very long time, because it was correct
9- So if the planet revolve around the sun or around the Earth the result will be the same, because both of them contributed to create the main line in the solar group
10- And because the sun is higher than the Earth, we see the sun hesitating motion to forward and backward with angle 63.7 degrees yearly, as a circle motion
11- So the sun circle motion is NOT true, but resulted from our wrong vision for the sun motion…
12- I claim, the planets from the Earth to Pluto move toward the sun, but Mercury and Venus move in the reverse direction
13- The Earth daily displacement toward the sun = 1 km
14- The previous modification can give us some explanation for the Egyptian astronomical phenomenon 2737, in which Mercury, Venus and Saturn were perpendicular on the Earth on 3/12/2012 (on the three Egyptian pyramids heads - appendix No.1),
15- Which proves, that the planets Not only revolve around the sun but also revolve around the Earth, supports this modification.
The solar planets motions description
The Solar Planets Motions Description
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Create One Unified General Motion.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The Solar Planets Motions Can be Similar to The Train Carriages Motions
- Or
- The Solar Planets Motions Can be Similar to The Chess Pieces Motions.
- Each Planet motion be defined to be complementary with other planets motions.
- The complementary motions be integrated one another and create One Unified General Motion.
- The Planets Motions General harmony is produced by the unified general motion.
- Each Planet motion can be considered as an obligatory motion defined for this planet by The Planets Unified General Motion.
- Each Planet Data be created in consistency with its motion. and because the planet motion be defined obligatory, Each planet data be defined as a result.
- The solar planets data be created complementary with each other because their motions be complementary with each other. that means no planet data can be created independently from the other planets data.
- Based on this vision
- The solar planets data be created based on One Geometrical Design
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Paper hypothesis
Saturn moves by a velocity = 0.99 c (where c = 300000 km per second)
Saturn almost moves by light velocity, and this high velocity motion creates relativistic effects in the solar system data
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Again
- I claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021, because
- Saturn moves by light velocity, and
- No planet moves by the sun mass gravity, because, the matter is created out of light and moves with its parent light by using different rates of time. As a result, the solar planets motions use different rates of time, and by using these different rates of time, Saturn can travel by a velocity = 99% of light velocity (300000 km/s)
- Shortly
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken, and tenths of papers provided huge number of proves against this theory – now – the theory lived for 400 years spite its an imaginary idea and wrong in its principle - But
- The Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021 sees nothing of all that! they provide no help for any real progress in the solar system motion understudying. They save the wrong theory of Newton spite the planets data contradicts it frequently
- This paper provides one more feature of planets real motion disproving Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity – and providing a claim against the decision 2021–
- No one has the right to mislead the humanity to learn the lies in place of the real knowledge and facts. No one has the authority and no can face the responsibility of all human misleading and misguiding
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found, (newton is wrong)
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found (Newton is Wrong)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
Paper hypothesis proves
Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Is Wrong Because
(1) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Transported Among The Planets
(2) The Solar Planets Motions Data Shows A Continuum Effect Through The Planets Motions
(3) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
(4) The Solar System Distances Be Created In One Network Form
(5) The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion.
(The sun is the planets motions result and not the reason)
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is a wrong theory. And we should remove it from the physics book. The previous proves are discussed in the paper. And they are decisive proves against the theory.
- Of course if the sun be created after all planets creation Newton theory be refuted clearly. But the historical records difficulties will prevent such proof by all means. For that reason we can't depend on this very good proof in our fighting against Newton theory.
- But
- We still have one more decisive proof against Newton which can kill this theory clearly and remove it at end from the physics book. This proof is the continuum effect of the solar planets motions data.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
- Where
- Planet Motion Features Prove Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- Many new features are discovered in the solar planets motions among which:
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
- The previous features disprove Planet Motion Independency Concept inherited by Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity- the features simply gives us a different vision about the solar system motion.
- Instead of the rigid body moving by the sun mass gravity independently from other rigid bodies in creation and motion data, The Solar Planet be a similar to a point on one trajectory of energy. where the solar planets move together one unified motion as train carriages transporting among the planets the motion with the rates of time making the solar system as a great Clock its input one motion creates (one second) and its output another motion creates (one solar day).
- And the 2 motions depend on one another as 2 gears in one machine of gears.
- Can this vision be a fact?
- I claim Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is created out of imagination basically because the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
- How can I prove my idea against Newton theory?
- By Planets Motions Data Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar System Geometrical Design depends on Mars and Pluto Motions
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The Solar Group is a machine of gears and each planet motion be used as a gear in it, the planets motions be integrated one another and create one unified motion.
- This vision tells, the solar system distances must be created as a network designed geometrically based on the planets positions and motions.
- The vision makes the solar group as a train and the planets as carriages in one train
- Accordingly, Planet motion can't be independent from the others'
- The dependency of motions among the planets depends on the planets motions periods, because each planet creates its own rate of time to perform the integration among the planets motions to create the planets unified general motion.
- Based on this vision, each planet position and motion data be defined in comparison with the other planets positions and data. As a result, the planets motions be similar to chess board pieces motions. each motion depends on the others and be calculated geometrically
- The vision disproves The Sun Mass Gravity Of Newton, and also Planet Motion Independency Concept which is inherited of Newton theory, because it tells the solar system moves by one geometrical design creates the planets data and motions.
- And
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury, and Pluto was the Mercury Moon.
- Some great strike caused Mars and Pluto to migrate from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
- By the planets migration, the solar system distances network be confused and needed a repair and by that, the solar system design takes Mars and Pluto as the basic 2 points to redesign the solar system distances Network
- The solar system design caused to create new 2 Planets (The moon and Saturn), to support the solar system redesign process.
Paper Objective
- The paper explains the solar system design, proving that Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken (this discussion be the paper part No. (II) under the title "The Solar System Creation Theory")
- The paper explains the changes be occurred by Mars and Pluto migration in the solar system design, proving the planets migration event (Part no. (I) of this paper under title (The Solar System Design Description)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter And Mercury Motions Analysis
Paper Arguments
- The paper provides 2 basic arguments
- (1st Argument)
- The Paper disproves Newton Theory of The sun mass gravity and proves that the solar planets motions can't be independent motions from one another but each planet motion depends on other planets motions.
- This discussion concludes that, the solar system distances be created in a network form, integrated together in one geometrical design.
- The argument conclusion is (The solar planet move one unified general motion)
- The 1st Argument Depends On (Jupiter Motion Analysis)
- (2nd Argument)
- The Paper claims that the solar planets motions be accompanying with a light beam motion which provides the required energy for the planets and their distances creation (because matter is created of energy and space is created of energy)
- The light motion accompanying with the solar planets motions cause the planets to move one unified general motion.
- The 2nd Argument Depends On (Mercury Motion Analysis)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.2)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Light Velocity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Light Velocity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- A Light Beam It Velocity=1.16 mkm/s Be A Companion With Mercury Motion.
The hypothesis explanation
- The hypothesis supposes that, the solar planets and their distances be created out of a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
- The hypothesis is a complex one because we need (at first) to prove that, there's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s.
- How can this hypothesis disprove Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity?
- The hypothesis supposes that, the solar group be created out of one light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s and the planets creation and motion data registers this light beam velocity because it's their source of energy.
- But
- The sun light velocity =300000 km.
- Means, this light beam (0.3 mkm/s) is created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s). and that proves the claim (The Sun is Created after all solar planets creation and motion) which disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass Gravity.
Paper objective
- The paper proves The light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Can Earth Motion effect on Pluto Motion?
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Pluto And The Moon Motions Are Effected By The Earth Motion.
The hypothesis Explanation
- I use the planets data analysis to discover the solar planets creation and motions.
- The planets data shows the following fact….
- Pluto Day Period be =153.3 hours because Pluto day period depends on The Earth moon day period (708.7h). That explains why Pluto day period is so long in comparison with the outer planets days periods. The fact is that, Pluto day period is created as a function in the Earth Moon Day Period.
- On the other side, the moon orbital apogee radius which should be = 413600 km became =406000 km because of Pluto motion effect on the moon orbital motion.
- Paper Objective
- Because no physics theory can give an explanation for such dependency found between 2 small masses planets which are at a huge distance between them, I have to prove this dependency between the 2 planets by all means. And as a result for these proves, we have to search after the method by which this dependency can be created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.3)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun is created after all solar planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun mass gravity decisively
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The paper analyzes the solar planet motion and compares it with Newton theory..
- Many new features be discovered and attributed to the planet motion and these features disprove also Newton theory in addition to the sun age theory.
1. Let's provide a list of these new discovered features in following:
2. The Solar planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion - By that the planets motions be similar to a machine of gears.
3. The Solar planets revolutions around the sun be done in equal periods of time
4. The Solar planets motions use different rates of time - by that the solar planets motions be similar to a great mechanical clock.
5. The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form. By that the solar system distances be similar to a chess board, each planet moves depending on the other planets motions and by using geometrical calculations
6. Mars and Pluto had migrated from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised) (2)
Paper hypothesis
-The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
-The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
-The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
-Because
-The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
-Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
-The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions rates of time be defined by using ONE RULE
- Based on the planets motions rates of time, the planets orbital periods and distances be defined. means,
- Based on this One Rule, the solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined.
- If the solar planets motions be independent from one another, how their orbital periods and distances be defined based on one rule only?
- The paper provides a proof that, the planets motions use different rates of time which proves that, the solar planets move one unified general motion. means,
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another and created one unified general motion, because of that, the planets motions need to use different rates of time to enable their motions to be integrated into one unified general motion.
- This fact changes the solar system description inherited from Newton theory of the sun mass gravity. The solar planets be similar to carriages in one train move together one unified motion. also the solar group can be similar to a mechanical clock, and the planets be similar to the gears of this clock. Each gear does one motion (and creates one rate of time) and these motions be integrated into one unified gnarl motion (and the rates of time be integrated into one unified general rate of time)
Paper objectives
- The paper provides the rule based on which all solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined, and test all planets motions data to prove that, no planet motion contradicts this rule.
- The paper tries to answer the question (why the solar planets use different rates of time) by providing The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory.
- The paper is divided into 2 parts.
- (1st Part) Provides the rule and its proves discussion
- (2nd Part) Provides The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III)
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
The Solar System Motion Depends On A Light Beam Motion
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar system motion depends on a light beam motion.
The hypothesis explanation
- There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec in the solar system
- The solar system is created out of this light beam energy. The light energy creates The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances
- Based on this vision
- The solar system motion depends on this light beam motion.
- As a result
- This light beam effects are seen frequently in the planets motions data. because the planet is similar to a puppet on the puppets theater, the light motion is the main player behind and by that the light moves by using planets motions data and the light motion effects on these planets motions data.
- The hypothesis tells another universe be found behind the universe of matter and the important news is that, the hidden universe causes the matter universe motion.
- By that, the solar planets don't move by the sun mass gravity. The solar planets are similar to ships found on a sea they move by this sea waves. Where the sea is the light motions, because of that the light motions define the planets motions range and creates their motions data.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves the light motion existence behind the planets motions and proves also that the light motion cause the planets motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Solar planets order disproves the gravity theory
Abstract
- The Solar Planets order proves that, the planet orbital distance is defined based on his Diameter and NOT his Mass, which disproves the Gravity Theory..
But
- Planet Diameter and Orbital Distance Relationship Equation is so hard to define…! Why?
Because
- The solar Group has 2 Heads (The Sun and Earth).
The Solar Group is A Dipole….
We need to modify the Solar Group Basic Description to be " A Dipole System"…
- This paper also discusses the Sun nature and Origin…
What's hot (20)
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
The sun obliquity disproves newton theory of the sun mass gravity
The sun obliquity disproves newton theory of the sun mass gravity
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) (Revised)
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) (Revised)
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found, (newton is wrong)
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found, (newton is wrong)
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.2)
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.2)
Light Velocity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Light Velocity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.3)
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.3)
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised) (2)
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised) (2)
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III)
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III)
The Solar System Motion Depends On A Light Beam Motion
The Solar System Motion Depends On A Light Beam Motion
Similar to Giant-Impact Hypothesis Supports "Mars Immigration Theory"
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (III)
The Giant-impact hypothesis suggests that, The Earth Moon is formed from the ejects of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planet…etc
I suggest the following theory:
- Mars itself had collided The Earth and not another planet. how that is happened?
- Mars original orbital distance =84 mkm, and Mars had to move from it to its new orbital distance =227.9 mkm – i.e. - Mars had to move from 84 mk to 227.9 mk.
- Through Mars motion – Mars had collided Venus (at first) and Earth (at Second)
- Mars had moved pushing by a strong force from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and that caused the collisions debris (and ejects) to move with Mars in the same motion –
- Venus has no Moon –because the debris had to move with Mars in the same motion, But because Earth Mass is greater than Venus & Mars and because the debris lost their high motion momentum, Earth could controlled some of these debris and created its moon by them – the rest debris still moved with Mars
- Mars could attract its 2 small moons from these debris
How to prove this story? By 3 following questions:
(1st question) Was Mars Original Orbital Distance = 84 mkm really? how to prove?
(2nd question) Is Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) an unique motion?
(3rd question) What are the results which prove this motion occurrence?
These questions will be discussed– but let's summarize the (3rd question) Answer:
Mars Immigration Results:
1- Mars Diameter Decreasing
2- The Asteroid Belt Creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (II)
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm from the sun and Mars had a force pushed it to change its original orbital distance to it’s a new one 227.9 mkm.
-Means Mars had moved from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) from the sun
-Mars during its motion from the point (84 mkm) to (227.9mkm)– Mars had collided with Venus (at First) and then collided with Earth (at second)
-These collisions caused some debris – and Mars had moved to complete its journey to its new orbital distance at point 227.9 mkm from the sun under the same force which caused its motion.
-Because of Mars Motion Direction, the debris can't stay around Venus and that explains why Venus has no moon – but because Earth has a greater Mass than Mars and because the debris lost their high momentum of motion – Earth could attracted some of these debris and created the Earth Moon
-This story is proved by Mars Motion Direction where this motion direction is the same direction of the solar system basic energy Motion which we have analyzed under the title "Jupiter Energy"
-Now because Mars Motion and Jupiter Energy Motion, Both are in the same direction – for that reason both are truth
-So the motion direction is from the point (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) to the sun- and that shows the direction of Motion.
-Now the collisions debris moved with Mars in the same direction and Earth could use some debris to created its moon but the rest of debris are attracted by Jupiter itself by which Jupiter created some of Jupiter rings or Asteroid belt
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
(Preprint No. 1) Mars Migration Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Mars ancient orbital distance was 84 mkm and changed to be 227.9 mkm later.
The hypothesis explanation
- Mars was the next planet after Mercury with orbital distance =84 mkm and Mars had migrated into Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)
- Through Mars Displacement from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), Mars had collided with Venus and then with Earth and then reach to its current orbital distance point
- By these collisions debris the Earth could create its own moon and also Mars moons are created in addition to the asteroid belt.
- Means, Mars itself caused the Earth moon creation by its Migration in place of the Planet (Theia) supposed by the Giant-impact hypothesis.
- Mars Migration theory answers the Giant-impact hypothesis questions, are:
- What's The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?– It's Venus
- Why Venus couldn't create its own moon from the collisions debris? Because Mars had moved from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), So Mars had pushed all debris in its motion direction because of that Venus found no debris around it to create its own moon, But Earth gravity is grater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their motion momentum, because of that Earth could create its own moon.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
A Life Was Found On Mars
A Life Was Found On Mars
Abstract
Paper Question
Is A Life Found On Mars In Its Ancient Time?
Paper Hypothesis
The Life Is Originated Regardless The Sun Existence And Effect
The Paper Theory (Mars Migration Theory)
- Mars had a life on its ancient time
Because
- The solar planets were created before the sun creation and because of that – all planets had lives in this period
- Mars Orbital Distance (before The sun Creation) was 84 mkm
Also
- Pluto was The Mercury Moon
Based on that – The Planets Ancient Order Was As Following – relative to the current sun position before the sun creation
- Mercury with Pluto (its Moon) with orbital distance (57.9 mkm) - Then Mars with orbital distance (84 mkm) – Then Venus with orbital distance (108.2 mkm) then Earth with orbital distance (149.6 mkm*) –Then Uranus – Then Neptune – Then Jupiter with orbital distance (5906 mkm)
(Note Please Earth orbital distance almost was 153 mkm and Venus orbital distance almost was 105 mkm)
Then The Sun Was Created (Causing Many Changes)
So
- Mars was migrated from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its current one (227.9 mkm)
- Through Mars Migration Motion – Mars had collided with Venus (at First) and then with Earth at second..
This Theory (Mars migration theory) is in consistency with The Giant-Impact Hypothesis
But
Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
Conclusions
- The was a life on Mars before its Migration from its original point (84 mkm) to its current one (227.9 mkm)
- This life is perished because of Mars Migration
- The Sun Creation Had Created A Selection For The Available Places For Life Which Was Not Found Before The Sun Creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation And Motion (IV)
Paper Question
-How The Earth Moon Is Created?
-The Giant –Impact Hypothesis provides a good description about How the Earth Moon was Created…
-I have suggested Mars Migration Theory which can solve many difficulties faces The Giant- Impact Theory and provides a very good answer for the question how the Moon was created?
-Mars Migration Theory is reviewed in this paper introduction
Now
-Mars Migration Theory tells that – the Earth Moon was created by Mars Collisions With Venus & Earth and from these Collisions debris the Earth Moon was created in addition to Mars moons and the Asteroid belt
But
-If the Earth Moon is created from the collisions debris – why the moon diameter is created based on geometrical rules?! How to do that?
Let's consider this question in more details… for example
-The earth Moon diameter x the sun diameter = Jupiter orbital circumference – Why? this data is one of similar hundreds – for example – the moon diameter x the moon orbital motion distance (from perigee to apogee 43000 km) = Earth orbital distance…!
I want to say… that
-The Earth Moon Diameter was not created by any random process - Some Geometrical Power is found behind and forced the moon to have this (Specific Diameter & Circumference) which will be in harmony with all planets data as we have seen…!
-What's this Geometrical Power? Is it the gravity force? can the gravity produce a complex geometrical effect? What Mass the Earth should have to produce its moon with another diameter? Based on what equation?
Let's to consider this question as deep as possible in this paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation And Motion (III)
Paper Hypothesis
-Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
-Mars & The Earth Moon Motions are Interacting because "Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
i.e. Even If The Earth Moon is created by Mars Collisions with Venus and Earth (through Mars Migration Motion)- but the Geometrical building of The Moon Planet still controlled by the same rules based on which Mars, Venus & Earth Were Created!
Why??
Because the light motion is the cause behind the planet motion-
And because of that – All planets motions are controlled by this same light motion –
Shortly
The light motion is the master and maker of the road and all planets are followers.
The paper discusses this hypothesis deeply-
First let's remember Mars Migration Theory – to discover the historical events by which the earth Moon was created from Mars collisions debris with Venus and Earth
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV.Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V.Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI.Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mars Immigration Theory
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Mars Immigration Theory Summary:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm but Mars was immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from the point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars had collided with Venus (at first) and then collided also with Earth (at second)
- From these collisions debris Earth Moon was created and Mars created its moons and the rest debris were attracted by Jupiter and created the asteroid belt
Based on that
- Mars was the planet which collided with Earth and Not Theia (Theia impact) as the Giant-Impact Hypothesis suggests
The theory answers many questions to improve the Giant –impact hypothesis:
(1st Question) Why Venus has no moon spite it had a similar collision?
Because Mars was moving from the point (84 mkm) to the point (227.9 mkm) – So Mars pushed all debris to move with it in the same motion direction – Mars had created a wave to push all debris far from Venues toward Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)- for that reason Venus Couldn't Create A Moon – but Earth has A Greater Mass and the Debris Lost Their Motion High Momentum at Earth – so Earth could created its moon from these debris
(2nd Question) The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?!
The Origin Of This Ocean Is Venus and by that – the mystery is solved easily – the moon rocks are consisted of 3 planets rocks which are Venus – Earth - Mars – and because of that the 3 planets rocks are seen among the moon rocks.
(3rd Question) why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)?
The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%) because the moon is created by all of them.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Sun Creation Event
Paper Hypothesis
-The Solar system is created by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm /sec
-The planets were created before the sun creation – All planets had lives in that time
-The Sun is Created as a result of interactions done between Mercury with Uranus and Neptune in the same time… and by both planets effect Mercury pushed the Sun to be created…!
In More Clear Explanation
-The light before Mercury has velocity =1.16 mkm/sec – and Mercury splits this light beam into 2 parts one of them is the light known velocity 0.3mkm/sec and the rest energy is seen as darkness (Space)!
-By That Mercury Caused To Create The Sun – i.e. Mercury main role in this process is to decrease the light velocity and caused to loss the great part of energy source in the solar system where only The rate (0.3/1.16) of energy still be seen as light beam where the other great part became seen as darkness.
- Because Of The Sun Creation – Mars had migrated from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its new one (227.9 mkm) and Pluto also migrated from its original point to the solar system end point
-Also As A Result Of The Sun Creation- the life is no longer available for all planets – but only on Earth because of the great changes the sun creation did – that explains Why Mars has features of ancient life – because all planets had lives in their ancient time before the sun creation but every thing is changed after
The paper tries to answer the following questions
-Why the sun was created?
-Is There a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
Let's remember Mars Migration Theory in the paper introduction.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The sun gravity concept is unreal (proves)
The Hypothesis
"There's No Gravity Found By The Sun"
This paper provides 5 proves for this hypothesis which are:
1- Planet Orbital Distance disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
2- The Sun Gravity Value disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
3- The Planet Velocity disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
4- The moon orbit analysis proves the solar group current description is incorrect.
5- The Solar Group is One Machine consists of all solar planets.
The Earth Moon is Older Than Saturn
Paper hypothesis
"Saturn is Created After The Earth Moon"
That means
Saturn is the most young planet in the solar system- Saturn is created after all other planets creation and also after The Earth Moon Creation.. How To Prove That?
The Proving Concept
The Solar System Is One Geometrical Structure or One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building
Imagine we have a triangle -2 angles of it =60 degrees and 50 degrees what's the third angle value ?? It's =70 degrees – so the third angle have to be 70 degrees because the other are found (before it) and defined its value
That's perfectly the same way
Saturn Data is found by the other planets effect- Saturn has no single independent data – on the contrary – its data is found before its creation – Saturn diameter had to be =120536 km and its orbital distance had to be =1433.5 mkm –
By Saturn data analysis we conclude easily that Saturn data was defined before Saturn Creation –
Based on that
Saturn Data doesn't only prove that- Saturn is the last planet created after all other
But
Saturn Data also proves the following:
(1st Concept)
"The Solar System Is One Geometrical Structure Or One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building"
(2nd Concept)
The Solar System Moves With All Planets Together One Unified Motion As A Train Moves With All Carriages.
How The Earth Moon is Created?
The paper introduction answers this question…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is The Earth Moon Diameter Created Based On Geometrical Calculations Why
Abstract
This (hard) question we still try to answer with the discussion in the previous papers
The Moon Creation And Motion (IV)
The Moon Creation And Motion ( V)
The Moon Creation And Motion (VI)
The paper provides a clear question let's consider it for a while
- The moon data shows that, the moon diameter is created based on geometrical calculations- We have seen many proves for this fact in that papers
- So –Why AND How? Should be the questions
- Why the moon diameter is created based on geometrical calculations? Because The Earth moon mass is created relative to Jupiter Mass! This proportionality between Jupiter Mass and the Earth Moon Mass causes the geometrical calculations! Such answer can be acceptable?!
- (First) Why does Jupiter Mass define the Earth Moon Mass?! and (Second) Why the proportionality between Jupiter and Earth Moon Masses causes the geometrical calculations?!
- Jupiter defines the Earth Moon mass because Jupiter is the inner planets Parent – means – Jupiter defines all inner planets masses and the Earth moon isn't different from the other inner planets! This is my answer! How to prove?
- Why does the proportionality between Jupiter mass and the Earth Moon mass produce geometrical calculations?
- Spite the idea is hard – it's clear in this abstract perfectly – So we need to move logically with it inside the paper step by step – (1st step) I provide data proves that the moon diameter is created based on geometrical calculation (2nd step) we will review the answer of the question why does Jupiter define the Earth Moon mass (this question we have answered in that papers) – (3rd step) we will try to understand why the proportionality between Jupiter and the moon masses can produce any geometrical calculations or rules (and this is the new part of discussion)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Sun Creation Reason And Effect (II)
Paper Argument
The Sun Is A Result Of The Solar Planets Motions- i.e. The Planets Were Moving Before The Sun Creation -
-The Paper compares between the solar system before & after The Sun Creation.
-The Paper asks "How did the planets move before The Sun Creation?"
-A Conclusion– The Sun is The Planets Motions Result and NOT The Reason.
Before The Sun Creation
The Solar Planets Order Was As Following
-Mercury (Where Pluto was The Mercury Moon) – then Mars –then Venus – Then Earth- The Uranus – Then Neptune – Then Jupiter –
After The Sun Creation
-The Planet Saturn Is Created
-Mars had migrated from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
-Pluto had migrated from its original point (The Mercury Moon) to (5906 mkm) – and Pluto collided with Neptune and from this collision debris Pluto had created its moons and The Kuiper Belt is Created
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But
-Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mars immigration theory (2)
This paper tries to answer 3 questions
(1st Question) Can "The Giant –Impact Hypothesis" provide a complete explanation for the Earth Moon Origin and Creation?
(2nd Question) Can Mars Immigration cause a risk on Earth?
(3rd Question) If Mars cause a risk on Earth, can the human save his life?
(Question No.1)
"Mars Immigration Theory Summary":
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris was attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-impact hypothesis is in consistency with Mars immigration theory
But
- Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation -
Mars Immigration Theory solves The difficulties of Giant-impact hypothesis:
I. Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – but Earth has greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum – so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around (5%) (and Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Why Mars was immigrated? Because of The Sun Creation Process
(A Conclusion: Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Gerges equations for solar group geometry
During 2013-2019 – I have studied the solar group geometry and discovered the following 5 Equations:
1- Planet Gravity Equation (Point 2-1)
2- Planet Orbital Distance Equation (Point 2-2)
3- Planet Diameter Equation (Point 2-3)
4- The Sun Rays Production Equation (Point 2-4)
5- Venus Diameter Equation (Point 2-5)
6- An Argument against The Big Bang Theory (Point 2-6)
Why Mars had immigrated with the Sun Creation
The Paper Hypothesis:
Because of The Sun Creation- Mars had immigrated from its original orbital distance (84mkm) to its current one (227.9 mkm)- after its Immigration– Mars had created configurations for its Data with the other planets –i.e. – Many Planets had changed their (own) data to be in configuration with Mars Data (Orbital Distance) – and because of these Data changes we could - through Planets Data analysis - conclude and prove Mars Immigration event through the solar system history.
Mars Immigration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars immigration theory
But
- Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation – through Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
Mars Immigration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars had immigrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars Immigration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation And Motion
Paper Hypothesis
The Earth Moon Is Created By Mars Collisions With of Venus & Earth
(This Suggested Theory Is Supported By The Giant-Impact Hypothesis)
Mars Migration Theory:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is The Earth Moon Diameter Created Based On Geometrical Calculations? Why? (II)
We still try to see our previous discussion depth… let's review its basic points…
-The 1st Question Was … Why The Earth Moon Diameter is created based on geometrical calculations as many data proves that strongly?
-The answer was – because Jupiter Mass defines the Earth Moon Mass, where the moon is created from the collisions debris that means the density was defined before – based on that the moon diameter is defined obligatory
-The 2nd Question Was…Why does Jupiter Mass define the Earth Moon Mass?
-The answer was – Because Jupiter is the inner planets parent i.e. Jupiter defines all inner planets masses and based on that Jupiter defines The Earth Moon Mass
-The 3rd Question Was…Why Jupiter definition for the earth Moon Mass causes geometrical calculations? In more clear words – if Jupiter mass/Earth moon mass = 25920 – why this number (25920) causes geometrical calculations for the moon diameter?!
-The answer–Because the rate 25920 shows that – There's a light accompanying the planet motion – what does that mean?
-The light and planet move together passing the same distance but with different rate of time – the light passes this distance 25920 mkm in 1 solar day but the planets pass the same distance in 1461 solar days – The Geometrical Calculations are necessary here to create the consistency between Planet and light motions –
i.e.
-The distance 25920 mkm is an exemplar for all solar system distances – all distances are passed by light & planet motions creating geometrical rules for the general unified motion consistency – so then we should ask!
(4th Question) Can You Prove That?
(5th Q.) How Can The Geometrical Rules Be Created By Planet And Light Motions?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Earth is Older Than The Sun
Paper hypothesis
The Earth Is Older Than The Sun
Paper Hypothesis Proves
1- The Solar Planets Order shows that- The Sun is A result of The Planets Motions and NOT Their Reason.
2- The Sun Data is Created depending on The Planets Data
3- The Solar System Chronological Events Proves That The Sun Is Created After The Planets Creation.
4- Saturn Data proves, "Saturn is The Only Planet Created After The Sun Creation"
There are 2 Basic Events were done Because Of The Sun Creation:
(1st Event) Mars Migration (2nd Event) Pluto Migration
Let's summarize these events general idea in following…
Pluto Migration
- Pluto was The Mercury Moon with orbital distance 57.9 mkm and had to migrate to 5906 mkm because of the sun creation –
- Pluto had collided with Neptune and from this collision debris Pluto had created its moons and The Kuiper Belt (The Paper discuss The Event Proves)
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Uranus Effect On Mars Migration (III)
1-The Planets were found before The Sun Creation.
2-Great changes had happened as results of The Sun Creation
3-These changes show Uranus effect on the inner planets
4-The Cycle 2737 years is produced resulting the Sun Creation
5-The Great changes are:
a.Mercury Day Is Changed From 176 Days To Be 175.94 Days
b.Venus Axial Tilt is changed from 1.774 degrees to 177.4 degrees
c.Pluto had to migrate far from Mercury 100 times (5906 mkm)
d.Mars had to migrate from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its current one (227.9mkm) (Mars Migration Theory)
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But
-Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions- and caused the Earth –Moon Creation – through Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm)
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus Has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion
(1) The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth and mars motions interaction
Abstract
Why does Earth rotate 4-years Cycle?
Because there's an interaction and coherence between Earth, Moon and Mars Motions, this interaction causes this 4-years Cycle
This paper tries to prove this fact, and explains its mechanism.
Also we discuss here the "Distance" and "Time" Definitions, explaining how to distinguish between the matter and space.
Similar to Giant-Impact Hypothesis Supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (20)
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (III)
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (III)
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (II)
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (II)
Is The Earth Moon Diameter Created Based On Geometrical Calculations Why
Is The Earth Moon Diameter Created Based On Geometrical Calculations Why
Is The Earth Moon Diameter Created Based On Geometrical Calculations? Why? (II)
Is The Earth Moon Diameter Created Based On Geometrical Calculations? Why? (II)
More from Gerges francis
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory.pdf
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion.pdf
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Life Depends On A Cycle.pdf
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon.pdf
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
The Sun Creation Process.pdf
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Planet Diameter Equation Analysis.pdf
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdf
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdf
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets.pdf
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation.pdf
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion.pdf
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
More from Gerges francis (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdf
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdf
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdf
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdf
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdf
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation Period
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdf
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdf
Recently uploaded
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
The ambient solar wind that flls the heliosphere originates from multiple
sources in the solar corona and is highly structured. It is often described
as high-speed, relatively homogeneous, plasma streams from coronal
holes and slow-speed, highly variable, streams whose source regions are
under debate. A key goal of ESA/NASA’s Solar Orbiter mission is to identify
solar wind sources and understand what drives the complexity seen in the
heliosphere. By combining magnetic feld modelling and spectroscopic
techniques with high-resolution observations and measurements, we show
that the solar wind variability detected in situ by Solar Orbiter in March
2022 is driven by spatio-temporal changes in the magnetic connectivity to
multiple sources in the solar atmosphere. The magnetic feld footpoints
connected to the spacecraft moved from the boundaries of a coronal hole
to one active region (12961) and then across to another region (12957). This
is refected in the in situ measurements, which show the transition from fast
to highly Alfvénic then to slow solar wind that is disrupted by the arrival of
a coronal mass ejection. Our results describe solar wind variability at 0.5 au
but are applicable to near-Earth observatories.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlands
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
Normal Cell Metabolism:
Cellular respiration describes the series of steps that cells use to break down sugar and other chemicals to get the energy we need to function.
Energy is stored in the bonds of glucose and when glucose is broken down, much of that energy is released.
Cell utilize energy in the form of ATP.
The first step of respiration is called glycolysis. In a series of steps, glycolysis breaks glucose into two smaller molecules - a chemical called pyruvate. A small amount of ATP is formed during this process.
Most healthy cells continue the breakdown in a second process, called the Kreb's cycle. The Kreb's cycle allows cells to “burn” the pyruvates made in glycolysis to get more ATP.
The last step in the breakdown of glucose is called oxidative phosphorylation (Ox-Phos).
It takes place in specialized cell structures called mitochondria. This process produces a large amount of ATP. Importantly, cells need oxygen to complete oxidative phosphorylation.
If a cell completes only glycolysis, only 2 molecules of ATP are made per glucose. However, if the cell completes the entire respiration process (glycolysis - Kreb's - oxidative phosphorylation), about 36 molecules of ATP are created, giving it much more energy to use.
IN CANCER CELL:
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
introduction to WARBERG PHENOMENA:
WARBURG EFFECT Usually, cancer cells are highly glycolytic (glucose addiction) and take up more glucose than do normal cells from outside.
Otto Heinrich Warburg (; 8 October 1883 – 1 August 1970) In 1931 was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology for his "discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme.
WARNBURG EFFECT : cancer cells under aerobic (well-oxygenated) conditions to metabolize glucose to lactate (aerobic glycolysis) is known as the Warburg effect. Warburg made the observation that tumor slices consume glucose and secrete lactate at a higher rate than normal tissues.
The ASGCT Annual Meeting was packed with exciting progress in the field advan...
The ASGCT Annual Meeting was packed with exciting progress in the field advancing efforts to deliver highly promising therapies to more patients.
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits: A Revolutionary
Breakthrough in Sustainable Energy Science
SCHIZOPHRENIA Disorder/ Brain Disorder.pdf
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technology
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
4. An Overview of Sugarcane White Leaf Disease in Vietnam.pdf
An overview of Sugarcane White Leaf Disease in Vietnam
Astronomy Update- Curiosity’s exploration of Mars _ Local Briefs _ leadertele...
Article written for leader telegram
Citrus Greening Disease and its Management
Citrus Greening was one of the major causes of decline in the citrus production. So, effective management cultural practices should be incorporated
Structures and textures of metamorphic rocks
It is useful for the Under Graduating students for easy understanding and it's useful for the exam preparations.
filosofia boliviana introducción jsjdjd.pptx
La filosofía boliviana y la búsqueda por construir pensamientos propios
Recently uploaded (20)
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
The ASGCT Annual Meeting was packed with exciting progress in the field advan...
The ASGCT Annual Meeting was packed with exciting progress in the field advan...
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technology
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technology
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
4. An Overview of Sugarcane White Leaf Disease in Vietnam.pdf
4. An Overview of Sugarcane White Leaf Disease in Vietnam.pdf
Body fluids_tonicity_dehydration_hypovolemia_hypervolemia.pptx
Body fluids_tonicity_dehydration_hypovolemia_hypervolemia.pptx
Astronomy Update- Curiosity’s exploration of Mars _ Local Briefs _ leadertele...
Astronomy Update- Curiosity’s exploration of Mars _ Local Briefs _ leadertele...
Giant-Impact Hypothesis Supports "Mars Immigration Theory"
- 1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawdrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 1 Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" The Author Authorized To Be Used By Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous 2nd Course Student–Physics Department Physics & Math Faculty – Peoples' Friendship University of Russia Moscow – Russia -2010-2013 Contacts TEL +201022532292 mrwaheid@gmail.com Ms. Svetlana Budochkina A Mathematics Analysis Teacher Physics & Math Faculty – Peoples' Friendship University of Russia Moscow – Russia The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt – 21st March 2020 Abstract The Giant-impact hypothesis suggests that Luna (the Moon) formed from the ejecta of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planetesimal, approximately 4.5 billion years ago, in the Hadean eon (about 20 to 100 million years after the Solar System coalesced).[1] The colliding body is sometimes called Theia, from the name of the mythical Greek Titan who was the mother of Selene, the goddess of the Moon.[2] Analysis of lunar rocks, published in a 2016 report, suggests that the impact may have been a direct hit, causing a thorough mixing of both parent bodies.[3] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant-impact_hypothesis) The Giant- impact hypothesis supports my theory of "Mars Immigration" Shortly - Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm, and because of an earthquake in the solar system Mars had immigrated from it to its new orbital distance 227.9 mkm And during this motion - Mars had collided With Venus At First And Then With Earth At End - Mars passed after the collision and didn't adhered with the Earth -instead – Mars collisions caused some debris to be thrown only - The main point here is that – Mars motion direction was from the Point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars in this motion was impacted by a great force that means all Mars collisions occurred during this motion caused its debris to be thrown In The Same Motion Direction and because of that the debris followed Mars to its new orbital distance but because Earth Mass is Greater than Mars the debris moved around Earth creating the Earth Moon. References Jupiter And Venus Motions Interaction https://vixra.org/abs/2003.0357 Mars Orbital Distance Is Changed Through History http://vixra.org/abs/1910.0509 Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292 Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044 Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1 Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous All my papers http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
- 2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawdrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 2 1- Introduction Why did I suggest this theory? Because - Mars Data Shows A Deep Interaction With Earth & Its Moon Also - Mars Data Shows A Deep Interaction With Mercury - Mars Data Shows A Great Interaction With Venus That shows, these interactions are found by some reason and Mars immigration is a very good reason for such interactions – Let's see some of this data to prove this theory: (I) - Mars orbital period 687 days = Earth orbital period 365.25 days x 1.9 - Mars orbital period 687 days = The moon orbital period 27.3 days x 25.2 Where 25.2 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt) and 1.9 degrees = Mars Orbital Inclination (II) - 0.526 degrees = Mars Motion degrees per solar day = (1/ 1.9 degrees) (Mars Orbital Inclination) - 25.2 degrees (Mars Axial Tilt)= 13.18 x 1.9 degrees (Mars Orbital Inclination) Where 13.18 degrees = the moon motion degrees per solar day Data No. (II) shows that, Mars orbital inclination (1.9) and the moon motion degrees 13.18 degrees both depends on the solar day period. (III) a. Earth orbital distance 149.6 mkm = 1.9 x 78.3 mkm Earth Mars Distance b. Mars orbital distance 227.9 mkm = 1.9 x119.7 mkm Venus Mars Distance c. Mars Earth distance 78.3mkm =1.9 x41.4 mkm Venus Earth Distance (errors less than 1%) (IV) - Earth diameter 12756 km = 1.9 x 6792 km Mars diameter (1 %) - 6792 km Mars diameter = 1.9 x 3475 km Earth Moon (2.8 %) (V) - Mars orbital period 687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter Orbital Period) Note Please Data No. (V) shows that, Mars data is effected by its neighbors (as Jupiter) – which that proves that the other planets were Mars neighbors and for that all of them effect on Mars Data.
- 3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawdrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 3 2- The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" 2-1 Mars immigration Theory Summary 2-2 How The Giant impart hypothesis supports "The Theory" (More Data) 2-1 Mars immigration Theory Summary The Mars immigration theory tells the following: - Mars Orbital Distance Was 84 Million Km From The Sun, so Mars was the second Planet after Mercury - Some great earthquake was occurred in the solar system and that caused Mars to immigrate from its original orbital distance (84 million km from the sun) to its new orbital distance (227.9 million km from the sun) That means - Mars moved from point 84 mkm to point 227.9 mkm And during this motion - Mars collided With Venus At First And Then With Earth At End - Mars passed after the collision and didn't adhered with the Earth as the Giant impart hypothesis supposed – instead – Mars collisions with Venus and Earth caused some debris from both to be thrown only - These debris is collected and moves around the Earth (The Great Mass) among the three planets – but it's not the full story - The main point here is that – Mars motion direction was from the Point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars in this motion was impacted by a great force which pushed it to the point 227.9 mkm and that means all collisions occurred during this motion caused its debris to be thrown in the same direction and because of the that the debris followed Mars to its new orbital distance but because Earth Mass is Greater than Mars the debris moved around Earth creating the Earth Moon
- 4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawdrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 4 2-2 How The Giant impart hypothesis supports "The Theory" (More Data) I add more Data to prove that, Mercury was Mars Neighbor and that proves Mars immigration from its original point 84 mkm from the sun its new one 227.9 mkm from the sun I-Data Equation No. (1) (Equation Error 1.5%) Equation No. (2) Equation No. (3) Equation No. (4) Mercury Rotation Period 1407.6 hours = Mars Rotation period 24.6 hours x (180/π) Equation No. (5) 7 deg. (Mercury Orbital Inclination)= 1.9 deg. (Mars Orbital Inclination)+ 5.1 deg. (Earth Moon Orbital Inclination) Equation No. (6) 5.1 deg. (Moon Orbital Inclination) x 2 = 3.4 deg. (Venus Orbital Inclination) x 3 Equation No. (7) (Mars Diameter/ Mercury Diameter)= (Mercury Diameter/ Moon Diameter) =1.4 524.0 MassMercury MassMars ) DiameterMars DiameterMercury ( 2 == 93.3 mkm57.9DistanceOrbitalMercury mkm227.9DistanceOrbitalMars days175.94DayMercury days687PeriodOrbitalMars == 029.1 days354.36YearSynodicMoon days365.25PeriodOrbitalEarth hours24DayEarth hours24.7DayMars ==
- 5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawdrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 5 II-Discussion The previous data shows that, Mars immigration is an event recorded in the planets data So the theory was just in consistency with the Giant impact hypothesis and explains it with more details That's one of the most important useful features of the planets data analysis – because the planets data recorded the planets historical events and tell us what's happened in the ancient times Now let's discuss the basic conflicting point between my theory and the giant impact hypothesis in the next point..
- 6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME Through the Mother of God mediation I do this research Gerges Francis Tawdrous/ 2nd Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia.. mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292 6 3- Matter Creation Argument Why doesn't Giant-impact hypothesis support "Mars Immigration Theory"? Paper Basic Argument The main difficulty here is that, the Giant impact hypothesis tells that the planet is adhered with Earth and after from this planet the Earth created debris which moves around the Earth and from which the moon is created Now if Mars collided Earth and adhered with it how Mars is found now? My idea is that, Mars collided but not adhered with Earth – Mars causes some debris from Venus and from Earth and these debris moved with Mars into his motion direction so all this debris collected together at Mars new orbital point but because Earth is more great than Mars and the debris lost their great momentum so the moon is created from these debris and move around Earth because its mass is greater than Mars. This is simple explanation what's happened and how But It's not so correct explanation The point here is in the description how the matter is created Because the big bang theory gives us this impression that ever thing is created by random and that's not correct Nothing here is created by random – let's use one example for better explanation Example Jupiter diameter =142984 mkm why? This value wasn't created by any random – there's a geometrical hand found behind the solar system – and for that (a) Jupiter diameter =8 Planets diameters total (b) 2 Jupiter diameters +1 Saturn diameter = the solar planets diameters total = Earth Moon distance at apogee point (c ) Jupiter diameter = (2 Jupiter circumferences) - (2 Saturn circumferences) (1.3%) (d) Jupiter Radius = Saturn Diameter – Neptune Diameter Discussion This data and many other are discussed in my previous papers – the matter isn't created by a random process – there's a geometrical reason for any value in the soalr system and for that Mars immigrated from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm where Mars couldn't immigrate to any other point because Mars displacement had to be =144 mkm only – Please review my papers Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets (I) https://vixra.org/abs/2002.0565 Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km? (1) http://vixra.org/abs/1907.0137