Seven questions answered by process hazard analysisPaul Baybutt
Process hazard analysis identifies hazard scenarios. It answers seven key questions to protect people, property and the environment from catastrophic accidents.
This document provides an overview of Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP). It defines HAZOP as a formal procedure to identify hazards in chemical processes. The summary includes:
- HAZOP identifies potential hazards, failures, and operability problems through a team approach including designers, operators, and safety experts.
- The HAZOP process involves dividing the system into nodes, applying guide words like "no," "more," and "part of" to process parameters to suggest deviations, and evaluating causes and consequences to recommend actions.
- Benefits of HAZOP include fewer problems during commissioning and operation, improved safety and product quality, and evidence of due diligence for insurers.
Safety in your company is a top priority, have you completed a process hazard analysis recently? When you complete a thorough PHA it improves safety, benefits your employees, streamlines the process and boosts your bottom line. In this slideshow, you can learn more about what a Process Hazard Analysis is, how it is completed properly and what to do with that information.
A hazard is a situation that poses a level of threat to life, health, property, or environment. Most hazards are dormant or potential, with only a theoretical risk of harm; however, once a hazard becomes "active", it can create an emergency. Hazard and possibility interact together to create risk.
Identification of hazard risks is the first step in performing a risk assessment.
This document discusses hazard analysis and risk assessment. It defines hazard and risk, and outlines the main steps in hazard analysis and risk assessment. These include identifying hazards, determining who may be harmed and how, assessing dose-response and exposure, risk management and control. Hazard analysis techniques include checklists, safety audits, preliminary hazard analysis, failure modes and effects analysis, what-if analysis, and hazard and operability studies. Risk assessment involves quantifying risk based on probability and severity. The document emphasizes that hazard analysis and risk assessment should be ongoing processes throughout the lifecycle of a system.
The Effectiveness of the Hazard and Operability Study Methodology in Process ...PECB
HAZOP is the acronym for HAZard and OPerability study. It is a structured and systematic examination of a planned or existing product, process, procedure or system. It is used to identify risks to people, equipment, environment and/or organizational objectives, focusing primarily on the design intent of the particular system.
The presentation introduces best practice approaches in conducting a HAZOP Study based on IEC Standard- 61882.
In this webinar, the presenter speaks freely of his experience in leading an actual HAZOP Study and highlights the advantages of this risk assessment technique.
Main points covered:
• How to create awareness of the use of the Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) Methodology in process Hazard Analysis (PHA)?
• How to familiarize Potential HAZOP Team Members with their Roles and Responsibilities in the HAZOP Examination of a Typical Facility?
A Case Summary Study Approach will be used based on the presenter’s own experience of leading an actual HAZOP Study.
Presenter:
This session was presented by PECB Trainer Jacob McLean, Principal Consultant and Managing Director of Kaizen Training & Management Consultants Limited.
Link of the recorded session published on YouTube: https://youtu.be/IvsrlHFADTo
A report on accident scenarios in process plants & how hazop can take lead ro...Ravi chandra kancherla
The document provides an overview of chemical accidents, their management and prevention. It discusses key lessons learned from major accidents like Bhopal and Visakhapatnam. Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) methods like HAZOP play an important role in identifying hazards and preventing accidents. HAZOP, in particular, is a systematic and rigorous technique to examine process parameters and anticipate how processes could fail to identify safety measures.
This document provides guidelines for conducting a Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) which is part of New South Wales' integrated risk assessment process for hazardous developments. A HAZOP systematically examines a facility's design and operation to identify potential hazards and issues. Section 2 outlines the HAZOP methodology which involves a team using "guide words" to evaluate each part of a facility. Section 3 describes the requirements for reporting the study results. The report documents any design or procedural changes resulting from the HAZOP.
Seven questions answered by process hazard analysisPaul Baybutt
Process hazard analysis identifies hazard scenarios. It answers seven key questions to protect people, property and the environment from catastrophic accidents.
This document provides an overview of Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP). It defines HAZOP as a formal procedure to identify hazards in chemical processes. The summary includes:
- HAZOP identifies potential hazards, failures, and operability problems through a team approach including designers, operators, and safety experts.
- The HAZOP process involves dividing the system into nodes, applying guide words like "no," "more," and "part of" to process parameters to suggest deviations, and evaluating causes and consequences to recommend actions.
- Benefits of HAZOP include fewer problems during commissioning and operation, improved safety and product quality, and evidence of due diligence for insurers.
Safety in your company is a top priority, have you completed a process hazard analysis recently? When you complete a thorough PHA it improves safety, benefits your employees, streamlines the process and boosts your bottom line. In this slideshow, you can learn more about what a Process Hazard Analysis is, how it is completed properly and what to do with that information.
A hazard is a situation that poses a level of threat to life, health, property, or environment. Most hazards are dormant or potential, with only a theoretical risk of harm; however, once a hazard becomes "active", it can create an emergency. Hazard and possibility interact together to create risk.
Identification of hazard risks is the first step in performing a risk assessment.
This document discusses hazard analysis and risk assessment. It defines hazard and risk, and outlines the main steps in hazard analysis and risk assessment. These include identifying hazards, determining who may be harmed and how, assessing dose-response and exposure, risk management and control. Hazard analysis techniques include checklists, safety audits, preliminary hazard analysis, failure modes and effects analysis, what-if analysis, and hazard and operability studies. Risk assessment involves quantifying risk based on probability and severity. The document emphasizes that hazard analysis and risk assessment should be ongoing processes throughout the lifecycle of a system.
The Effectiveness of the Hazard and Operability Study Methodology in Process ...PECB
HAZOP is the acronym for HAZard and OPerability study. It is a structured and systematic examination of a planned or existing product, process, procedure or system. It is used to identify risks to people, equipment, environment and/or organizational objectives, focusing primarily on the design intent of the particular system.
The presentation introduces best practice approaches in conducting a HAZOP Study based on IEC Standard- 61882.
In this webinar, the presenter speaks freely of his experience in leading an actual HAZOP Study and highlights the advantages of this risk assessment technique.
Main points covered:
• How to create awareness of the use of the Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) Methodology in process Hazard Analysis (PHA)?
• How to familiarize Potential HAZOP Team Members with their Roles and Responsibilities in the HAZOP Examination of a Typical Facility?
A Case Summary Study Approach will be used based on the presenter’s own experience of leading an actual HAZOP Study.
Presenter:
This session was presented by PECB Trainer Jacob McLean, Principal Consultant and Managing Director of Kaizen Training & Management Consultants Limited.
Link of the recorded session published on YouTube: https://youtu.be/IvsrlHFADTo
A report on accident scenarios in process plants & how hazop can take lead ro...Ravi chandra kancherla
The document provides an overview of chemical accidents, their management and prevention. It discusses key lessons learned from major accidents like Bhopal and Visakhapatnam. Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) methods like HAZOP play an important role in identifying hazards and preventing accidents. HAZOP, in particular, is a systematic and rigorous technique to examine process parameters and anticipate how processes could fail to identify safety measures.
This document provides guidelines for conducting a Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) which is part of New South Wales' integrated risk assessment process for hazardous developments. A HAZOP systematically examines a facility's design and operation to identify potential hazards and issues. Section 2 outlines the HAZOP methodology which involves a team using "guide words" to evaluate each part of a facility. Section 3 describes the requirements for reporting the study results. The report documents any design or procedural changes resulting from the HAZOP.
This document discusses hazard analysis, which allows employers to identify potential safety problems and corrective measures to improve safety. It describes several hazard analysis techniques including What-If analysis, checklists, Hazard and Operability Studies, and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. What-If analysis involves experienced personnel brainstorming "What if?" questions to evaluate potential process hazards and failures. Checklists consist of yes/no questions about facility design and operation. Hazard and Operability Studies identify safety hazards and operational problems. While no technique can identify all accident scenarios, hazard analysis plays an important role in reducing industrial accidents when rigorously applied.
Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) is a technique used to identify and evaluate risks and hazards in complex systems. It involves a team systematically analyzing potential failure scenarios and consequences. The goal is to inform risk-based decisions to safely operate facilities while meeting production goals. Key methods discussed are Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP), Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA), and Safety Integrity Level (SIL) assessment, which complement each other in identifying risks. Probability principles and understanding different attitudes toward risk are also important aspects of effectively applying PHA.
Implementing effective preventive and predictive maintenance programshossam hassanein
The document discusses implementing effective preventive and predictive maintenance programs. It covers various maintenance strategies including reactive, preventive, predictive, reliability-centered, and total productive maintenance. Key aspects of developing a preventive maintenance program are discussed such as performing a feasibility analysis, establishing time-based or dynamic-based schedules, and calculating overall equipment effectiveness. The document provides an overview of setting up an effective maintenance program.
This document discusses risk assessment and management for quarries. It outlines the objectives of risk assessment, defines risk management principles, and describes various risk assessment methodologies including qualitative, quantitative, failure modes and effects analysis, and hazard and operability studies. The stages of risk management are identified as hazard identification, risk evaluation, and risk control. UK health and safety legislation requires employers to conduct suitable and efficient risk assessments to identify necessary risk control measures.
This document provides an overview and introduction to a HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) training workshop. It discusses the key drivers for process safety regulations like OSHA PSM, including several major industrial accidents. It then explains what a HAZOP study is, how it fits into Process Hazard Analysis requirements, and provides definitions and methodology descriptions for conducting a HAZOP. The document is intended to introduce participants to HAZOP and provide essential background information on regulatory frameworks and best practices for process safety management.
A Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) study is a structured and systematic examination of a planned or existing process or operation in order to identify and evaluate problems that may represent risks to personnel or equipment, or prevent efficient operation.
The HAZOP technique was initially developed to analyze chemical process systems, but has later been extended to other types of systems and also to complex operations and to software systems.
This document provides an introduction and overview of HAZOP (Hazard and Operability) analysis. It discusses that HAZOP is a systematic approach to identifying hazards and deviations from design parameters like flow, temperature, and pressure. The objectives of HAZOP are to investigate potential deviations from design intent and their causes, consequences, safeguards, and recommended actions. An example HAZOP analysis is provided to illustrate the methodology. Key advantages of HAZOP include improving safety and identifying imaginative risks and operability issues. Recent major accidents in the pharmaceutical industry are also briefly mentioned.
This document discusses process hazard analysis (PHA). It defines hazards as inherent characteristics that can cause harm. PHA allows employers to identify potential safety problems, corrective measures, and emergency plans. The analysis must be performed by a team with relevant expertise using an established methodology. It must address hazards, previous incidents, engineering controls, consequences of control failure, and more. Common methodologies include What-If analysis, checklists, HAZOP, FMEA, and fault tree analysis. The document concludes that companies using rigorous PHA are seeing reductions in accident frequency and severity.
A HAZOP (Hazard and Operability) study is a systematic technique used to identify potential hazards and operability problems in processes. It involves a team reviewing a process and its design to identify possible deviations from safe operation. The document outlines the HAZOP process including preparation, terminology, meeting procedures, follow up actions and documentation. Key aspects include selecting a team with relevant expertise, gathering process information, using guide words to identify deviations, assessing risks, recommending safeguards, and documenting actions.
Implementation and application of a Process Safety Management System. This presentation will focus on the history, purpose and scope of a Process Safety Management (PSM) system. Topics covered include:
-Distinctions between personnel and process safety
-Framework and elements of PSM
-Importance of Safety Culture in the implementation and application of a PSM system
-Relevance and importance of regular audits and assessments of PSM systems
Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) | Gaurav Singh RajputGaurav Singh Rajput
This document provides an overview of Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) studies. It begins with defining what a HAZOP study is, which is a systematic technique used to identify potential hazards and operating problems in industrial processes. The document then discusses the origins and development of HAZOP methodology. It provides details on the objectives, procedures, guidelines and key aspects of conducting a HAZOP study, including dividing the process into sections, using guide words to identify possible deviations, and documenting causes, consequences and recommended actions. Overall, the document serves as an introduction to HAZOP studies, covering their fundamental principles and approaches.
One the most important problem in the chemical, oil&gas or nuclear Industry is the Risk Assessment evaluation. In the theoretical studies, the part of risk analysis is sometimes not considered because the case of study is not real or it hasn't been still industrialized. In the real industry there are different processes for industrializing a product. The HAZOP technique is one example of Risk assessment tecniques. For further information go to: http://www.cholarisk.com/
This document provides an overview of risk analysis. It defines key terms like risk, risk analysis, risk assessment, and risk management. It describes various qualitative and quantitative methods used for risk analysis, including hazard and operability studies, fault tree analysis, failure mode and effects analysis. The document discusses the importance of risk analysis for chemical processes and highlights some historical accidents to emphasize this. It also provides examples of applying different risk analysis methods.
This document provides an overview of Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) studies, which are a technique used to identify potential hazards and operability problems in processes. It describes the origins, purpose, methodology, and typical components of a HAZOP study. Key aspects covered include identifying potential deviations from normal operating conditions using guidewords, determining causes and consequences of deviations, evaluating existing safeguards, and developing recommendations to address identified hazards. The document also outlines the HAZOP process, including defining nodes to segment the system, assigning a team to conduct the study, and systematically analyzing each node using guidewords across parameters.
Hazop study on sewage treatment plant at educational institutioneSAT Publishing House
IJRET : International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology is an international peer reviewed, online journal published by eSAT Publishing House for the enhancement of research in various disciplines of Engineering and Technology. The aim and scope of the journal is to provide an academic medium and an important reference for the advancement and dissemination of research results that support high-level learning, teaching and research in the fields of Engineering and Technology. We bring together Scientists, Academician, Field Engineers, Scholars and Students of related fields of Engineering and Technology
Hazop Training - Intermediate Level Course iFluidsJohn Kingsley
The Fundamentals of HAZOP Study
A hazard and operability study (HAZOP) is a structured and systematic examination of a complex planned or existing process or operation in order to identify and evaluate problems that may represent risks to personnel or equipment. In this online training, you will be learning The Fundamentals of HAZOP Study.
What you will learn
HAZOP Study Stands for Hazard and Operability Study. Hazop is the structured brainstorming technique to identify Hazards involved in a chemical process plant. It is an important Industrial Safety tool. HAZOP study is carried out during the design stage of the process plant or during carrying out any modification in the existing plant. Live interactive sessions over the internet, combined with practical examples completed offline and shared via email to us. You will simply require a computer with a reliable internet connection, a headset with a high-quality microphone.
Course Content
What is a HAZOP Study?
Definition of basic terms
Risk matrix/ALARP principle
When to Perform a HAZOP Study
Different stages of Hazop study and relevant Data requirement
HAZOP STUDY - TEAM COMPOSITION
Generally accepted rules of HAZOP
Overall HAZOP Methodology
Layers of protection/Safeguard
Hierarchy of controls (with simple example)
HAZOP Study-Example
https://trainings.ifluids.com/
1. The document discusses techniques for hazard identification and risk assessment, including plant safety inspections, job safety analysis, accident investigations, safety audits, and hazard operability studies.
2. Plant safety inspections aim to identify unsafe acts or conditions for both workers and machinery by examining housekeeping, material handling, guarding of machines, lighting, and use of personal protective equipment.
3. Job safety analysis breaks jobs down into steps to identify hazards at each step and develop safety measures to eliminate hazards.
The second eBook in a three-part series explaining the regulations triggered when your organization acquires and uses chemicals. Learn about dozens of environmental, health and safety (EH&S) provisions intended to ensure that those chemicals are managed safely.
On December 19, 2007, a powerful explosion equivalent to 1400 pounds of TNT occurred at the T2 Laboratories chemical plant in Jacksonville, Florida during the production of methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MCMT). The root cause was identified as a lack of knowledge about a second exothermic reaction during the design of the MCMT production line. This led to an inefficient water cooling system and ineffective pressure relief system. The failure of the water cooling system triggered an uncontrollable runaway reaction, increasing temperature and pressure until the reactor exploded. The explosion caused damage up to 1900 feet away and injuries to 32 people, with 4 deaths of T2 employees due to close proximity.
This document discusses hazard analysis, which allows employers to identify potential safety problems and corrective measures to improve safety. It describes several hazard analysis techniques including What-If analysis, checklists, Hazard and Operability Studies, and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. What-If analysis involves experienced personnel brainstorming "What if?" questions to evaluate potential process hazards and failures. Checklists consist of yes/no questions about facility design and operation. Hazard and Operability Studies identify safety hazards and operational problems. While no technique can identify all accident scenarios, hazard analysis plays an important role in reducing industrial accidents when rigorously applied.
Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) is a technique used to identify and evaluate risks and hazards in complex systems. It involves a team systematically analyzing potential failure scenarios and consequences. The goal is to inform risk-based decisions to safely operate facilities while meeting production goals. Key methods discussed are Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP), Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA), and Safety Integrity Level (SIL) assessment, which complement each other in identifying risks. Probability principles and understanding different attitudes toward risk are also important aspects of effectively applying PHA.
Implementing effective preventive and predictive maintenance programshossam hassanein
The document discusses implementing effective preventive and predictive maintenance programs. It covers various maintenance strategies including reactive, preventive, predictive, reliability-centered, and total productive maintenance. Key aspects of developing a preventive maintenance program are discussed such as performing a feasibility analysis, establishing time-based or dynamic-based schedules, and calculating overall equipment effectiveness. The document provides an overview of setting up an effective maintenance program.
This document discusses risk assessment and management for quarries. It outlines the objectives of risk assessment, defines risk management principles, and describes various risk assessment methodologies including qualitative, quantitative, failure modes and effects analysis, and hazard and operability studies. The stages of risk management are identified as hazard identification, risk evaluation, and risk control. UK health and safety legislation requires employers to conduct suitable and efficient risk assessments to identify necessary risk control measures.
This document provides an overview and introduction to a HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) training workshop. It discusses the key drivers for process safety regulations like OSHA PSM, including several major industrial accidents. It then explains what a HAZOP study is, how it fits into Process Hazard Analysis requirements, and provides definitions and methodology descriptions for conducting a HAZOP. The document is intended to introduce participants to HAZOP and provide essential background information on regulatory frameworks and best practices for process safety management.
A Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) study is a structured and systematic examination of a planned or existing process or operation in order to identify and evaluate problems that may represent risks to personnel or equipment, or prevent efficient operation.
The HAZOP technique was initially developed to analyze chemical process systems, but has later been extended to other types of systems and also to complex operations and to software systems.
This document provides an introduction and overview of HAZOP (Hazard and Operability) analysis. It discusses that HAZOP is a systematic approach to identifying hazards and deviations from design parameters like flow, temperature, and pressure. The objectives of HAZOP are to investigate potential deviations from design intent and their causes, consequences, safeguards, and recommended actions. An example HAZOP analysis is provided to illustrate the methodology. Key advantages of HAZOP include improving safety and identifying imaginative risks and operability issues. Recent major accidents in the pharmaceutical industry are also briefly mentioned.
This document discusses process hazard analysis (PHA). It defines hazards as inherent characteristics that can cause harm. PHA allows employers to identify potential safety problems, corrective measures, and emergency plans. The analysis must be performed by a team with relevant expertise using an established methodology. It must address hazards, previous incidents, engineering controls, consequences of control failure, and more. Common methodologies include What-If analysis, checklists, HAZOP, FMEA, and fault tree analysis. The document concludes that companies using rigorous PHA are seeing reductions in accident frequency and severity.
A HAZOP (Hazard and Operability) study is a systematic technique used to identify potential hazards and operability problems in processes. It involves a team reviewing a process and its design to identify possible deviations from safe operation. The document outlines the HAZOP process including preparation, terminology, meeting procedures, follow up actions and documentation. Key aspects include selecting a team with relevant expertise, gathering process information, using guide words to identify deviations, assessing risks, recommending safeguards, and documenting actions.
Implementation and application of a Process Safety Management System. This presentation will focus on the history, purpose and scope of a Process Safety Management (PSM) system. Topics covered include:
-Distinctions between personnel and process safety
-Framework and elements of PSM
-Importance of Safety Culture in the implementation and application of a PSM system
-Relevance and importance of regular audits and assessments of PSM systems
Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) | Gaurav Singh RajputGaurav Singh Rajput
This document provides an overview of Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) studies. It begins with defining what a HAZOP study is, which is a systematic technique used to identify potential hazards and operating problems in industrial processes. The document then discusses the origins and development of HAZOP methodology. It provides details on the objectives, procedures, guidelines and key aspects of conducting a HAZOP study, including dividing the process into sections, using guide words to identify possible deviations, and documenting causes, consequences and recommended actions. Overall, the document serves as an introduction to HAZOP studies, covering their fundamental principles and approaches.
One the most important problem in the chemical, oil&gas or nuclear Industry is the Risk Assessment evaluation. In the theoretical studies, the part of risk analysis is sometimes not considered because the case of study is not real or it hasn't been still industrialized. In the real industry there are different processes for industrializing a product. The HAZOP technique is one example of Risk assessment tecniques. For further information go to: http://www.cholarisk.com/
This document provides an overview of risk analysis. It defines key terms like risk, risk analysis, risk assessment, and risk management. It describes various qualitative and quantitative methods used for risk analysis, including hazard and operability studies, fault tree analysis, failure mode and effects analysis. The document discusses the importance of risk analysis for chemical processes and highlights some historical accidents to emphasize this. It also provides examples of applying different risk analysis methods.
This document provides an overview of Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) studies, which are a technique used to identify potential hazards and operability problems in processes. It describes the origins, purpose, methodology, and typical components of a HAZOP study. Key aspects covered include identifying potential deviations from normal operating conditions using guidewords, determining causes and consequences of deviations, evaluating existing safeguards, and developing recommendations to address identified hazards. The document also outlines the HAZOP process, including defining nodes to segment the system, assigning a team to conduct the study, and systematically analyzing each node using guidewords across parameters.
Hazop study on sewage treatment plant at educational institutioneSAT Publishing House
IJRET : International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology is an international peer reviewed, online journal published by eSAT Publishing House for the enhancement of research in various disciplines of Engineering and Technology. The aim and scope of the journal is to provide an academic medium and an important reference for the advancement and dissemination of research results that support high-level learning, teaching and research in the fields of Engineering and Technology. We bring together Scientists, Academician, Field Engineers, Scholars and Students of related fields of Engineering and Technology
Hazop Training - Intermediate Level Course iFluidsJohn Kingsley
The Fundamentals of HAZOP Study
A hazard and operability study (HAZOP) is a structured and systematic examination of a complex planned or existing process or operation in order to identify and evaluate problems that may represent risks to personnel or equipment. In this online training, you will be learning The Fundamentals of HAZOP Study.
What you will learn
HAZOP Study Stands for Hazard and Operability Study. Hazop is the structured brainstorming technique to identify Hazards involved in a chemical process plant. It is an important Industrial Safety tool. HAZOP study is carried out during the design stage of the process plant or during carrying out any modification in the existing plant. Live interactive sessions over the internet, combined with practical examples completed offline and shared via email to us. You will simply require a computer with a reliable internet connection, a headset with a high-quality microphone.
Course Content
What is a HAZOP Study?
Definition of basic terms
Risk matrix/ALARP principle
When to Perform a HAZOP Study
Different stages of Hazop study and relevant Data requirement
HAZOP STUDY - TEAM COMPOSITION
Generally accepted rules of HAZOP
Overall HAZOP Methodology
Layers of protection/Safeguard
Hierarchy of controls (with simple example)
HAZOP Study-Example
https://trainings.ifluids.com/
1. The document discusses techniques for hazard identification and risk assessment, including plant safety inspections, job safety analysis, accident investigations, safety audits, and hazard operability studies.
2. Plant safety inspections aim to identify unsafe acts or conditions for both workers and machinery by examining housekeeping, material handling, guarding of machines, lighting, and use of personal protective equipment.
3. Job safety analysis breaks jobs down into steps to identify hazards at each step and develop safety measures to eliminate hazards.
The second eBook in a three-part series explaining the regulations triggered when your organization acquires and uses chemicals. Learn about dozens of environmental, health and safety (EH&S) provisions intended to ensure that those chemicals are managed safely.
On December 19, 2007, a powerful explosion equivalent to 1400 pounds of TNT occurred at the T2 Laboratories chemical plant in Jacksonville, Florida during the production of methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MCMT). The root cause was identified as a lack of knowledge about a second exothermic reaction during the design of the MCMT production line. This led to an inefficient water cooling system and ineffective pressure relief system. The failure of the water cooling system triggered an uncontrollable runaway reaction, increasing temperature and pressure until the reactor exploded. The explosion caused damage up to 1900 feet away and injuries to 32 people, with 4 deaths of T2 employees due to close proximity.
Dokumen tersebut membahas tentang penggunaan konsep integral dalam menghitung luas daerah di bawah kurva dan volume benda putar. Termasuk menjelaskan rumus-rumus untuk menghitung luas daerah yang dibatasi oleh dua kurva, sumbu x, dan batas integral. Juga memberikan contoh soal dan pembahasan untuk menghitung luas daerah tertentu.
Iraz Öksüz has over 20 years of experience working with SAP modules such as FI, CO, AA, PC, SD, PP, MM, BW, and SM. He has extensive experience implementing SAP solutions, managing projects, and providing support. Currently, he works as an Application Support Manager at Unilever in Istanbul, where he is responsible for user access management, security reviews, incident management, and ensuring compliance.
RentalRake is a service that searches multiple rental listing websites such as Zillow, Realtor, Craigslist, and more to compile rental property listings into a personalized report for customers. Customers provide their search criteria and RentalRake delivers a consolidated report of available options from across these sites within 48 hours, saving customers the effort of searching each individual site.
This document provides a chronological overview of the history of psychology from ancient times through the 1890s. Some key points mentioned include:
- Ancient Greek philosophers like Plato and Hippocrates made early contributions to the study of the mind and mental processes.
- Beginning in the Middle Ages, Islamic scholars made advances in clinical psychology and established early psychiatric hospitals.
- In the 16th-17th centuries, philosophers like Descartes introduced mind-body dualism and theories of consciousness.
- The 18th-19th centuries saw the development of fields like psychophysics and physiological psychology. Pioneers included Wundt, Fechner, Helmholtz.
- The late 19th century saw the
Muchas personas usan la bicicleta como medio de transporte pero son pocos los que saben la historia que esta lleva consigo.
Aqui sabras cual es la historia que esta tiene
The document appears to be a slide from a Haiku Deck presentation that contains photo credits from various photographers and sources. Towards the bottom it encourages the viewer to create their own Haiku Deck presentation on SlideShare and provides a link to get started.
The document provides a detailed history of psychology from ancient times through the 19th century. Some key points covered include:
- Ancient Greek philosophers like Plato and Hippocrates made early contributions to the field by introducing principles of scientific medicine and suggesting the brain is the seat of mental processes.
- During medieval times, Islamic physicians developed early concepts of clinical psychiatry and psychotherapy and built some of the first psychiatric hospitals.
- In the 16th-17th centuries, philosophers like Descartes introduced mind-body dualism while others like Spinoza argued the mind and body are one.
- The 18th century saw the coining of the term "psychology" and early empirical studies of the
ERECON Services is an executive search and staffing firm that provides quality recruiting services across multiple industries including IT, construction, manufacturing, and healthcare (1). They have a large database and network of contacts to source candidates quickly and accurately (2). ERECON aims to work as a strategic partner to clients, ensuring a deep understanding of their business needs to deliver high-quality hiring solutions (3).
The document discusses labor relations in the new economy and issues faced by independent contractors, such as misclassification by employers to avoid responsibilities. It explores debates around how independent contractors are distinguished from employees under labor laws. The emergence of organizations like the Freelancers Union is examined as an example of how workers in the new economy are self-organizing in nontraditional ways outside of traditional employee protections.
Simone Fonseca is a design and communications specialist based in the UK. She has experience pitching new business opportunities, including presenting a Brazilian steakhouse concept to property developers and hosting an art exhibition in a landmark building. Her portfolio and contact details are provided.
This document outlines the key elements of process safety leadership. It discusses process safety management and how it differs from personal safety. It emphasizes the importance of process safety leadership, organizational learning, management of change, worker engagement, and competence. Effective process safety requires commitment from all levels of leadership to ensure proper resources, oversight, investigation of incidents to promote continuous learning, and management of risks associated with changes.
Suitability of Agile Methods for Safety-Critical Systems Development: A Surve...Editor IJCATR
Lately, agile methods have widely been used in large organizations. This contrasts to previous practice, where they were mainly
used for small projects. However, developers of safety critical systems have shied away from using these methods for the right and wrong
reasons. Adoption of agile methods for safety critical system development is low and there is need to find out why this is so especially
since agile methods allow a more relaxed approach towards documentation, flexible development lifecycle based on short iterations and
accommodates changing requirements. This paper presents a report of a detailed analysis of literature and aims to shed light on the
suitability of agile methods for developing safety critical systems .The findings indicate that many organizations are relying on traditional
methods to develop safety critical systems because they are familiar with them and have been thoroughly tested over time. However with
the advent of agile methods there is a paradigm shift by non safety critical system developers, nevertheless this is not happening with the
safety critical system developers and there is need to find out why.
The document discusses various topics related to software development including challenges, opportunities, and best practices. Some key points:
1. Software development involves many phases from requirements analysis to testing to maintenance. It is important to involve users, establish clear standards, and divide projects into well-defined phases and activities.
2. Developing software presents inherent challenges like changing requirements, managing frequent changes, and ensuring compatibility with existing systems. Adopting a problem-solving approach and justifying systems as investments can help address some challenges.
3. Opportunities in software development include making the process more cost-effective, improving quality, and capturing important domain knowledge. New approaches like model-driven development also offer benefits if properly
The correct answer is c. The quality of the information used to develop the tests is a factor that influences the test effort involved in most projects. Factors like requirements documentation, software size, life cycle model used, process maturity, time constraints, availability of skilled resources, and test results all impact the test effort.
This document discusses test organization and management. It describes different approaches to organizing testing teams, including project organization, line organization, and staff organization. The modern approach is to have small, self-contained teams that integrate all design, development, maintenance, and operations tasks. This "whole-team" or DevOps approach blends project and line organizations. The document also discusses roles like test leaders and testers, and the skills needed for testing, including knowledge of applications, technology, and testing practices. It notes that testing effort is influenced by factors like documentation, quality characteristics, and complexity.
A real-world introduction to PSM’s 14 Elements360factors
A number of recent incidents in various parts of the world have highlighted the increasing importance of effective Process Safety Management (PSM). This webinar presents a high-level overview of OSHA’s PSM requirements as well as real-world examples of how companies handle compliance.
Objectives
• Describe some of the major catastrophes which led to the formulation of PSM regulations.
• Introduce the 14 Elements of PSM.
• Present examples of various implementation approaches.
This document provides information about a 4-day training course on Process Safety Management. The course will cover topics such as hazard identification, risk assessment, inherently safer design, safety instrumented systems, incident investigation and management of change. It will include case studies and practical exercises. The course is designed for professionals involved in process safety, such as PSM managers and engineers. It will be led by an experienced instructor and aims to help participants improve safety management practices.
Using the test process improvement models. Case study based on TPI Next model...Sigma Software
The document discusses using the TPI Next test process improvement model. It provides an overview of the TPI Next model, which evaluates test processes across 16 key areas and 4 maturity levels. It then presents a case study example of implementing TPI Next on a project. The case study involves evaluating the current test process maturity, identifying improvement priorities, creating a test process improvement plan, implementing improvements, and planning the next improvement cycle. While most improvements were successfully implemented, one faced resistance from management.
Антон Мужайло, «Using the test process improvement models. Case study based o...Sigma Software
The document discusses implementing the TPI Next test process improvement model on a case study project. It begins by introducing TPI Next and its key areas and maturity levels. It then outlines the implementation process, which includes evaluating the current situation, planning improvements, implementing them, and re-evaluating. As part of the case study, the document shows how to use TPI Next tools to assess maturity across 16 areas, prioritize improvements, and create a test process improvement plan to address priorities. Resistance was encountered in fully implementing one improvement around tester involvement in risk analysis.
The document discusses various aspects of prototyping, including prototype development methodologies, types of prototypes, evaluation techniques, and tools used in prototyping. Specifically, it covers methodology for prototype development, types of prototypes like throwaway, evolutionary, and incremental prototypes. It also discusses techniques for prototype evaluation like protocol analysis and cognitive walkthroughs, and the benefits of prototyping for software development.
Mike Marshall, PE (mtmarshall.llc@gmail.com) is an Oil & Gas industry consultant who has recently developed an EAM loss prevention and asset optimization software product derived from various spreadsheet-based tools (consisting of business methods, practices, KPIs, scorecards, reports, data maps/views, etc.) which were central to the actual asset performance optimization/management and process safety improvement metrics and methodologies he implemented while working for both Marathon (23 years) and Chevron (10 years).
Risk Driven Approach to Test Device Softwareijtsrd
Software testing is one of the most crucial testings in the software development process. Software testing should be scheduled and managed very effectively. The risk is the situation that has not occurred yet and may not occur in the future as well. After looking at this definition, risks can refer to the probability of the failure for a particular project. Risk based testing is the type of testing that is based on the priority and importance of the software that has to be tested. In this research work, the new technique to test the device software has been proposed using the JAVA language. The new system is able to test the software based on various risks and provide alternatives based on that the risk can be reduced in the future. It also calculates the updated cost and duration required to complete the software when a risk has occurred. The proposed application is able to provide efficient and accurate results in terms of entered risks on the device software. In the future, the software can be used to test the device software for more number of risks to make it more suitable as per the user's requirements. Ashwani Kumar | Prince Sood "Risk Driven Approach to Test Device Software" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-5 , August 2019, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd25230.pdfPaper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/computer-science/other/25230/risk-driven-approach-to-test-device-software/ashwani-kumar
The document provides guidance on conducting a HAZOP (Hazard and Operability) study. It defines key terms related to a HAZOP study and outlines the HAZOP process. A HAZOP study requires a cross-functional team to identify potential hazards and issues in a systematic way. The team examines process sections and identifies possible deviations from design intentions, then analyzes the causes and consequences of deviations. The goal is to identify safety and operability issues to improve design and operations.
The document provides an overview of software testing fundamentals including definitions of testing, why testing is necessary, quality versus testing, general testing vocabulary, testing objectives, and general testing principles. It defines software testing as verifying and validating that software meets requirements, works as expected, and discusses how testing is needed because humans make mistakes and software errors can have expensive and dangerous consequences. The document also provides definitions of quality, contrasts popular versus technical views of quality, and outlines key aspects of quality like functionality, reliability, and value.
5 Things to Look for in Corrective Action Software SolutionsEtQ, Inc.
When we look at any compliance system, Corrective Action is central to that process. It's how we identify potential systemic issues, take steps to correct those issues, and foster overall improvement on operations. As technology evolves, many seek to automate this process as much as possible.
In just 5 minutes, we'll uncover 5 ways you can automate and streamline your Corrective Action process.
This document provides an overview of Test Management Approach (TMap), a methodology for structured software testing developed by Sogeti. TMap is a risk-based approach that focuses testing on the highest priority risks and quality characteristics. It involves business-driven test management, a structured test process across various phases, and a complete set of testing techniques and tools. The methodology aims to improve software quality while optimizing the testing process and costs.
A Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) study is a structured technique used to identify potential problems in processes. It involves dividing a system into nodes and having a team apply guide words like "no", "more", "less" to process parameters at each node to identify possible deviations from design intent. The team then analyzes the causes and consequences of deviations and recommends actions. Key aspects of a HAZOP include composing a multidisciplinary team, using guide words and parameters at study nodes, and documenting results in a report with worksheets.
KuberTENes Birthday Bash Guadalajara - K8sGPT first impressionsVictor Morales
K8sGPT is a tool that analyzes and diagnoses Kubernetes clusters. This presentation was used to share the requirements and dependencies to deploy K8sGPT in a local environment.
Comparative analysis between traditional aquaponics and reconstructed aquapon...bijceesjournal
The aquaponic system of planting is a method that does not require soil usage. It is a method that only needs water, fish, lava rocks (a substitute for soil), and plants. Aquaponic systems are sustainable and environmentally friendly. Its use not only helps to plant in small spaces but also helps reduce artificial chemical use and minimizes excess water use, as aquaponics consumes 90% less water than soil-based gardening. The study applied a descriptive and experimental design to assess and compare conventional and reconstructed aquaponic methods for reproducing tomatoes. The researchers created an observation checklist to determine the significant factors of the study. The study aims to determine the significant difference between traditional aquaponics and reconstructed aquaponics systems propagating tomatoes in terms of height, weight, girth, and number of fruits. The reconstructed aquaponics system’s higher growth yield results in a much more nourished crop than the traditional aquaponics system. It is superior in its number of fruits, height, weight, and girth measurement. Moreover, the reconstructed aquaponics system is proven to eliminate all the hindrances present in the traditional aquaponics system, which are overcrowding of fish, algae growth, pest problems, contaminated water, and dead fish.
Optimizing Gradle Builds - Gradle DPE Tour Berlin 2024Sinan KOZAK
Sinan from the Delivery Hero mobile infrastructure engineering team shares a deep dive into performance acceleration with Gradle build cache optimizations. Sinan shares their journey into solving complex build-cache problems that affect Gradle builds. By understanding the challenges and solutions found in our journey, we aim to demonstrate the possibilities for faster builds. The case study reveals how overlapping outputs and cache misconfigurations led to significant increases in build times, especially as the project scaled up with numerous modules using Paparazzi tests. The journey from diagnosing to defeating cache issues offers invaluable lessons on maintaining cache integrity without sacrificing functionality.
International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...gerogepatton
International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Applications (NLAIM 2024) offers a premier global platform for exchanging insights and findings in the theory, methodology, and applications of NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and their applications. The conference seeks substantial contributions across all key domains of NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and their practical applications, aiming to foster both theoretical advancements and real-world implementations. With a focus on facilitating collaboration between researchers and practitioners from academia and industry, the conference serves as a nexus for sharing the latest developments in the field.
Understanding Inductive Bias in Machine LearningSUTEJAS
This presentation explores the concept of inductive bias in machine learning. It explains how algorithms come with built-in assumptions and preferences that guide the learning process. You'll learn about the different types of inductive bias and how they can impact the performance and generalizability of machine learning models.
The presentation also covers the positive and negative aspects of inductive bias, along with strategies for mitigating potential drawbacks. We'll explore examples of how bias manifests in algorithms like neural networks and decision trees.
By understanding inductive bias, you can gain valuable insights into how machine learning models work and make informed decisions when building and deploying them.
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...IJECEIAES
This paper describes a speed control device for generating electrical energy on an electricity network based on the doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) used for wind power conversion systems. At first, a double-fed induction generator model was constructed. A control law is formulated to govern the flow of energy between the stator of a DFIG and the energy network using three types of controllers: proportional integral (PI), sliding mode controller (SMC) and second order sliding mode controller (SOSMC). Their different results in terms of power reference tracking, reaction to unexpected speed fluctuations, sensitivity to perturbations, and resilience against machine parameter alterations are compared. MATLAB/Simulink was used to conduct the simulations for the preceding study. Multiple simulations have shown very satisfying results, and the investigations demonstrate the efficacy and power-enhancing capabilities of the suggested control system.
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODELgerogepatton
As digital technology becomes more deeply embedded in power systems, protecting the communication
networks of Smart Grids (SG) has emerged as a critical concern. Distributed Network Protocol 3 (DNP3)
represents a multi-tiered application layer protocol extensively utilized in Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition (SCADA)-based smart grids to facilitate real-time data gathering and control functionalities.
Robust Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are necessary for early threat detection and mitigation because
of the interconnection of these networks, which makes them vulnerable to a variety of cyberattacks. To
solve this issue, this paper develops a hybrid Deep Learning (DL) model specifically designed for intrusion
detection in smart grids. The proposed approach is a combination of the Convolutional Neural Network
(CNN) and the Long-Short-Term Memory algorithms (LSTM). We employed a recent intrusion detection
dataset (DNP3), which focuses on unauthorized commands and Denial of Service (DoS) cyberattacks, to
train and test our model. The results of our experiments show that our CNN-LSTM method is much better
at finding smart grid intrusions than other deep learning algorithms used for classification. In addition,
our proposed approach improves accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, achieving a high detection
accuracy rate of 99.50%.
2. PrimaTech
TIP 1 – Define the study purpose,
scope and objectives
• A statement of purpose, scope and objectives is
essential to ensure studies are focused and complete
• The statement defines what must be addressed
– Also constrains studies to appropriate content
• Helps to ensure studies are conducted effectively and
efficiently
• For more information:
– The importance of defining the purpose, scope, and
objectives for process hazard analysis studies, Process
Safety Progress, Volume 34, Issue 1, pages 84 - 88, March,
2015
3. PrimaTech
TIP 2 – Use selection criteria for
practitioners
• A competency management system should be used
to ensure HAZOP practitioners are appropriately
qualified
• Selection criteria for facilitators and team members
should cover technical and personal attributes
• For more information:
Competency requirements for process hazard analysis teams,
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Volume
33, pages 151-158, January 2015
4. PrimaTech
TIP 3 – Validate safeguards separately
• Validation of the installation, functionality, and integrity
of safeguards should be performed before
commencing studies
– Inclusion would cause a serious distraction
• Studies should focus on the qualification of safeguards
for individual hazard scenarios
• For more information:
On the validation of safeguards for process hazard analysis,
Process Safety Progress, Volume 32, Issue 2, pages 165–169,
June 2013
5. PrimaTech
TIP 4 - Address all process phases
• Processes experience various phases of operation during
their lifecycle
– Startup, normal operation, shutdown, etc.
• Hazard scenarios may occur during any of these phases
– May vary by phase
• Studies must address all phases of process operation
• For more information:
Process hazard analysis for phases of operation in the process life
cycle, Process Safety Progress, Vol. 31, Issue 3, pages 279–281,
September, 2012
6. PrimaTech
TIP 5 – Do not pre-complete
worksheets
• Some HAZOP facilitators enter scenarios into the
study worksheets in advance of team sessions
– To reduce the time and effort required by the team
• The practice is poor technically and may violate
regulatory requirements
– Can lead to incomplete identification of scenarios
• For more information:
Pre-work and pre-completion of worksheets for process hazard
analysis, Process Safety Progress, Vol. 31, Issue 3, pages
275–278, September, 2012
7. PrimaTech
TIP 6 – Manage human factors
• HAZOP studies are subject to possible human failures
by the people who perform them
• Studies are difficult and time-consuming activities that
place significant demands on participants
– Increases the chance that errors will be made
• Human factors that influence study performance must
be recognized and addressed
• For more information:
The role of people and human factors in performing process
hazard analysis, J. of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,
Vol. 26 pages1352-1365, 2013
8. PrimaTech
TIP 7 – Do not use super nodes
• Some companies use super nodes or combinations of
lines and major vessels to speed up studies
• The practice complicates the analysis and may result
in missed scenarios
• The line-by-line approach should be used instead
• For more information:
– Analytical Methods in Process Safety Management and
System Safety Engineering – Process Hazards Analysis, in
Handbook of Loss Prevention Engineering, Wiley, 2013
9. PrimaTech
TIP 8 - Fully address design intent
• Deviations from design intent are used to identify
hazard and operability scenarios
• Often, a short checklist of process parameters is
used
• This practice likely results in missed scenarios
• A full consideration of design intent is needed
– Ensure scenarios are identified as completely as possible
• For more information:
Design intent for hazard and operability studies, Process
Safety Progress, DOI: 10.1002/prs.11718
10. PrimaTech
TIP 9 – Identify basic causes
• Causes of hazard scenarios can be defined at
various levels
– Immediate, basic, underlying, and root
• HAZOP practitioners must decide at what level
causes will be identified
• Generally, at least basic causes should be recorded
• For more information:
Initiating events, levels of causality, and process hazard
analysis, Process Safety Progress, Vol. 33, Issue 3, pages
217–220, September 2014
11. PrimaTech
TIP 10 – Address multiple failures
• Hazard scenarios may involve multiple failures
– Initiating events may be single or multiple failures
– Safeguards are subject to multiple failures
– Enabling events may combine with other scenario events to
produce multiple failures
• Important scenarios will be missed if multiple failures
are not addressed
– Risks will be underestimated
• For more information:
Treatment of multiple failures in process hazard analysis,
Process Safety Progress, Vol. 32, Issue 4, pages 361–364,
December 2013