This document discusses rehabilitation and evaluation. It defines rehabilitation as using medical, social, educational and vocational measures to train individuals to their highest functional ability. The areas of rehabilitation include medical, vocational, social and psychological rehabilitation. Evaluation is defined as determining the value or worth of a program by comparing it to a standard. There are two main types of evaluation - formative evaluation which assesses needs and implementation, and summative evaluation which assesses outcomes and impacts. Planning the evaluation determines whether it will be done internally or externally.

1. REHABILITATION
AND EVALUATION
OF HEALTH
QURATULAIN MUGHAL
BATCH IV
DOCTOR OF PHYSICAL THERAPY
ISRA UNIVERSITY

2. REHABILITATION
Defined as “combined and coordinated
use of medical , social , educational and
vocational measures for training and
retraining the individual to the highest
possible level of functional ability”
Areas of concern in rehabilitation :
Medical rehabilitation
Vocational rehabilitation
Social rehabilitation
Psychological rehabilitation

3. REHABILITATION
PROCESS

4. MEDICAL REHABILITATION
Is a follow up treatment after any
kind of treatment program

5. REHABILITATION
BENEFITS
 Repetitive and task-specific exercises:
•Sensory-motor function
•The functional of upper-limb
•Eye-hand coordination
•Cognitive skills and perception
•Sitting balance and postural control
•Gait ability
•Activities of daily living
•Problem solving / decision making
•Social aspect and co-operation, mental health
•Motivation and active involvement to rehabilitation process
•Increase the participation to society
 quality of life

6. Needs for Rehabilitation
Impairment
 Disability
Handicap
Functional limitation

7. EVALUATION
“the process in which planners
determine the value or worth of the
objective of interest by comparing
it against a standard of
acceptability”

8. STANDARD OF
ACCEPTABILITY
A comparative mandate, value,
norm or group.

9. Types of Evaluation
Formative evaluation
Summative evaluation

10. Formative evaluation
INCLUDES SEVERAL EVALUATION TYPES:
 needs assessment determines who needs the program,
how great the need is, and what might work to meet the
need
 evaluability assessment determines whether an
evaluation is feasible and how stakeholders can help
shape its usefulness
 structured conceptualization helps stakeholders define
the program or technology, the target population, and the
possible outcomes
 implementation evaluation monitors the fidelity of the
program or technology delivery
 process evaluation investigates the process of delivering
the program or technology, including alternative delivery
procedures

11. Summative evaluation
CAN ALSO BE SUBDIVIDED:
 outcome evaluations investigate whether the program or
technology caused demonstrable effects on specifically
defined target outcomes
 impact evaluation is broader and assesses the overall or
net effects -- intended or unintended -- of the program or
technology as a whole
 cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis address
questions of efficiency by standardizing outcomes in
terms of their dollar costs and values
 secondary analysis reexamines existing data to address
new questions or use methods not previously employed
 meta-analysis integrates the outcome estimates from
multiple studies to arrive at an overall or summary
judgment on an evaluation question

12. PLANNING THE EVALUATION
It’s the min-step, which determined
who will evaluate the program.
*INTERNAL EVALUATOR:
“one who already is involved in the
program”
*EXTERNALEVALUATOR:
“one from outside the program”