Methodologies in Social Science
Studies
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Research Methodology
Methodologies are high-level
approaches to conducting
research.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Research Methodology
The individual steps within the
methodology might vary
based on the research being
performed.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Common Methodologies
•Two commonly used research
methodologies in Social
Sciences or Science Policy and
Management Studies are:
•Quantitative and Qualitative
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Common Methodologies
Patent Citation Analysis is a
Purely Policy and Innovation
Management tool to analyze
the Science and Technology
developments.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Comparison Between
Quantitative and
Qualitative Research
Methodology
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Comparing Quantitative and
Qualitative Research
What are the basic differences
between quantitative and
qualitative research methods?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Quantitative and qualitative research
methods differ primarily in:
• Their analytical objectives
• The types of questions they pose
• The types of data collection instruments
they use
• The forms of data they produce
• The degree of flexibility built into study
design
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Methodology Comparison
• Quantitative
• Explanation, prediction
• Test theories
• Known variables
• Large sample
• Standardized
instruments
• Deductive
• Approach: Positivism
• Qualitative
• Explanation, description
• Build theories
• Unknown variables
• Small sample
• Observations, interviews
• Inductive
• Approach:Interpretivism
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Difference between
Quantitative and
Qualitative methods
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• The key difference between
quantitative and qualitative methods is
their Flexibility.
• Generally, quantitative methods are
fairly inflexible.
Difference between Quantitative and
Qualitative methods
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
With quantitative methods such as
surveys and questionnaires, for
example, researchers ask all
participants identical questions in the
same order. The response categories
from which participants may choose
are “closed-ended” or fixed.
Difference between Quantitative and
Qualitative methods
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• The advantage of this inflexibility is that it
allows for meaningful comparison of
responses across participants and study sites.
However, it requires a thorough
understanding of the important questions to
ask, the best way to ask them, and the range
of possible responses.
Difference between Quantitative and
Qualitative methods
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Qualitative methods are typically
more flexible – that is, they allow
greater spontaneity and
adaptation of the interaction
between the researcher and the
study participant.
For example,
Difference between Quantitative and
Qualitative methods
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
For example, qualitative methods ask mostly
“open-ended” questions that are not necessarily
worded in exactly the same way with each
participant.
With open-ended questions, participants are free
to respond in their own words, and these
responses tend to be more complex than simply
“YES” or “NO.”
Difference between Quantitative and
Qualitative methods
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• In addition, with qualitative methods, the
relationship between the researcher and the
participant is often less formal than in
quantitative research.
• Participants have the opportunity to respond
more elaborately and in greater detail than
is typically the case with quantitative
methods.
Difference between Quantitative and
Qualitative methods
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• In turn, researchers have the opportunity to respond
immediately to what participants say by tailoring subsequent
questions to information the participant has provided.
• It is important to note, however, that there is a range of
flexibility among methods used in both quantitative and
qualitative research and that flexibility is not an indication of
how scientifically rigorous a method is.
• Rather, the degree of flexibility reflects the kind of
understanding of the problem that is being pursued using the
method.
Difference between Quantitative and
Qualitative methods
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Introduction to
Qualitative Research
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Introduction
• Qualitative research methods are gaining popularity
outside the traditional academic social sciences,
particularly in public health and international
development research.
• Qualitative methods have become important tools
within this broader approach to applied research, in
large part because they provide valuable insights
into the local perspectives of study populations.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
What is Qualitative Research?
• Qualitative Research is a type of scientific research.
• In general terms, scientific research consists of an
investigation that:
• seeks answers to a question
• Systematically uses a predefined set of procedures to
answer the question
• collects evidence
• produces findings that were not determined in advance
• produces findings that are applicable beyond the
immediate boundaries of the study
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• Qualitative research also seeks to
understand a given research problem or
topic from the perspectives of the local
population it involves.
• Qualitative research is especially effective in
obtaining culturally specific information
about the values, opinions, behaviours, and
social contexts of particular populations.
What is Qualitative Research?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
What can we learn from
Qualitative Research?
• The strength of qualitative research is its
ability to provide complex textual
descriptions of how people experience a
given research issue.
• It provides information about the “human”
side of an issue – that is, the often
contradictory behaviours, beliefs, opinions,
emotions, and relationships of individuals.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Qualitative methods are also effective in
identifying intangible factors, such as social
norms, socioeconomic status, gender roles,
ethnicity, and religion, whose role in the
research issue may not be readily apparent.
What can we learn from
Qualitative Research?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
When used along with quantitative
methods, qualitative research can help
us to interpret and better understand
the complex reality of a given situation
and the implications of quantitative
data.
What can we learn from
Qualitative Research?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• Although findings from qualitative data can often be
extended to people with characteristics similar to
those in the study population, gaining a rich and
complex understanding of a specific social context
or phenomenon typically takes precedence over
eliciting data that can be generalized to other
geographical areas or populations.
• In this sense, qualitative research differs slightly
from scientific research in general.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Advantages of
Qualitative Methods
for Exploratory
Research
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• One advantage of qualitative methods in
exploratory research is that use of open-ended
questions and probing gives participants the
opportunity to respond in their own words, rather
than forcing them to choose from fixed responses,
as quantitative methods do.
Advantages of Qualitative Methods for
Exploratory Research
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Open-ended questions have the ability
to evoke responses that are:
• Meaningful and culturally salient to
the participant
• Unanticipated by the researcher
• Rich and explanatory in nature
Advantages of Qualitative Methods for
Exploratory Research
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Another advantage of qualitative
methods is that they allow the
researcher the flexibility to probe
initial participant responses – that is,
to ask why or how.
Advantages of Qualitative Methods for
Exploratory Research
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
The researcher must listen carefully to
what participants say, engage with
them according to their individual
personalities and styles, and use
“probes” to encourage them to
elaborate on their answers.
Advantages of Qualitative Methods for
Exploratory Research
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Types of Qualitative Research
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
What are Qualitative Research
Methods?
• The Three most common qualitative
methods are
• participant observation,
• in-depth interviews, and
• focus groups.
• Each method is particularly suited for
obtaining a specific type of data.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• Participant observation
This method appropriate for collecting
data on naturally occurring behaviours
in their usual contexts.
What are Qualitative Research
Methods?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• In-depth interviews
These are optimal for collecting data on
individuals’ personal histories, perspectives,
and experiences, particularly when sensitive
topics are being explored.
What are Qualitative Research
Methods?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• Focus groups
These focus groups are effective in eliciting
data on the cultural norms of a group and in
generating broad overviews of issues of
concern to the cultural groups or subgroups
represented.
What are Qualitative Research
Methods?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Participant Observation
What people say they believe and say that they do
are often contradicted by their behaviour. A large
body of scientific literature documenting this
disparity exists, and we can all likely summon
examples from our own lives. Given the frequency of
this very human inconsistency, observation can be a
powerful check against what people report about
themselves during interviews and focus groups.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
What is participant observation?
Participant observation is a qualitative method with roots in
traditional ethnographic research, whose objective is to help
researchers learn the perspectives held by study populations.
As qualitative researchers, we presume that there will be
multiple perspectives within any given community.
We are interested both in knowing what those diverse
perspectives are and in understanding the interplay among
them.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• Qualitative researchers accomplish this through
observation alone or by both observing and
participating, to varying degrees, in the study
community’s daily activities.
• Participant observation always takes place in
community settings, in locations believed to have
some relevance to the research questions.
What is participant observation?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• The method is distinctive because the researcher
approaches participants in their own environment
rather than having the participants come to the
researcher.
• Generally speaking, the researcher engaged in
participant observation tries to learn what life is like
for an “insider” while remaining, inevitably, an
“outsider.”
What is participant observation?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• In the community settings, researchers make careful, objective
notes about what they see, recording all accounts and
observations as field notes in a field notebook.
• Informal conversation and interaction with members of the
study population are also important components of the method
and should be recorded in the field notes, in as much detail as
possible.
• Information and messages communicated through mass media
such as radio or television may also be pertinent and thus
desirable to document.
What is participant observation?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• Data obtained through participant observation serve as a check
against participants’ subjective reporting of what they believe
and do.
• Participant observation is also useful for gaining an
understanding of the physical, social, cultural, and economic
contexts in which study participants live; the relationships
among and between people, contexts, ideas, norms, and
events; and people’s behaviours and activities – what they do,
how frequently, and with whom.
What can we learn from participant observation?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• Through participant observation, researchers can also uncover
factors important for a thorough understanding of the research
problem but that were unknown when the study was designed.
• This is the great advantage of the method because, although
we may get truthful answers to the research questions we ask,
we may not always ask the right questions. Thus, what we
learn from participant observation can help us not only to
understand data collected through other methods (such as
interviews, focus groups, and quantitative research methods),
but also to design questions for those methods that will give us
the best understanding of the phenomenon being studied.
What can we learn from participant observation?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• The main disadvantage of participant observation is that it is
time-consuming.
• A second disadvantage of participant observation is the
difficulty of documenting the data – it is hard to write down
everything that is important while you are in the act of
participating and observing.
What are the disadvantages of participant
observation?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• A third disadvantage of participant observation is that it is an
inherently subjective exercise, whereas research requires
objectivity.
• It is therefore important to understand the difference between
reporting or describing what you observe (more objective)
versus interpreting what you see (less objective).
• Filtering out personal biases may take some practice. One way
to practice is to write down objective observations of a given
event on one side of a page, and then offer more subjective
interpretations of the same event on the other side of the page,
as illustrated in the box at left.
What are the disadvantages of
participant observation?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
What form do participant observation
data take?
• In large part, participant observation data
consist of the detailed field notes that the
researcher records in a field notebook.
• Although typically textual, such data may also
include maps and other diagrams, such as
kinship or organizational charts.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
In-Depth Interviews
• In-depth interviews are one of the most common
qualitative methods.
• One reason for their popularity is that they are very
effective in giving a human face to research
problems.
• For participants –in-depth interviews offer the
opportunity to express themselves in a way ordinary
life rarely affords them.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
What is an in-depth interview?
• The in-depth interview is a technique designed to elicit a vivid
picture of the participant’s perspective on the research topic.
• During in-depth interviews, the person being interviewed is
considered the expert and the interviewer is considered the
student.
• The researcher’s interviewing techniques are motivated by the
desire to learn everything the participant can share about the
research topic.
• Researchers engage with participants by posing questions in a
neutral manner, listening attentively to participants’ responses,
and asking follow-up questions and probes based on those
responses.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• In-depth interviews are usually
conducted face-to-face and involve one
interviewer and one participant.
• Phone conversations and interviews
with more than one participant also
qualify as in-depth interviews.
What is an in-depth interview?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
What can we learn from in-depth
interviews?
• In-depth interviews are useful for learning
about the perspectives of individuals.
• They are an effective qualitative method for
getting people to talk about their personal
feelings, opinions, and experiences.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Focus Groups
• Focus groups are a qualitative data collection method effective
in helping researchers learn the social norms of a community or
subgroup, as well as the range of perspectives that exist within
that community or subgroup.
• Focus groups are often used to determine what service or
product a particular population wants or would like to have,
such as in marketing studies.
• Because focus groups seek to illuminate group opinion, the
method is especially well suited for socio-behavioural research
that will be used to develop and measure services that meet the
needs of a given population.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
What is a focus group?
• A focus group is a qualitative data collection method in which
one or two researchers and several participants meet as a
group to discuss a given research topic.
• These sessions are usually tape-recorded, and sometimes
videotaped.
• One researcher (the moderator) leads the discussion by asking
participants to respond to open-ended questions – that is,
questions that require an in-depth response rather than a single
phrase or simple “yes” or “no” answer.
• A second researcher (the note-taker) takes detailed notes on
the discussion.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• A principal advantage of focus groups is that they
yield a large amount of information over a relatively
short period of time. They are also effective for
accessing a broad range of views on a specific topic,
as opposed to achieving group consensus.
• Focus groups are not the best method for acquiring
information on highly personal or socially sensitive
topics; one-on-one interviews are better-suited for
such topics.
What is a focus group?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
What can we learn from focus groups?
• Focus groups are especially effective for capturing information
about social norms and the variety of opinions or views within a
population.
• The richness of focus group data emerges from the group
dynamic and from the diversity of the group.
• Participants influence each other through their presence and
their reactions to what other people say. Because not everyone
will have the same views and experiences – because of
differences in age, gender, education, access to resources, and
other factors – many different viewpoints will likely be
expressed by participants.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
What form do focus group data take?
• Focus group data consist of tape recordings,
transcripts of those recordings, the moderator’s and
note-taker’s notes from the discussion, and notes
from the debriefing session held after the focus
group.
• Notes are initially handwritten in field notebooks, on
the focus group guide, or on special forms.
• After data collection, all handwritten notes are
expanded into more complete narratives, then
entered into a computer.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
How are focus group data used?
• Typed transcripts are the most utilized form of focus
group data.
• During the data analysis phase of the research, after
data collection, transcripts are coded according to
participants’ responses to each question and/or to
the most salient themes emerging across the set of
focus groups.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• The moderator’s and note-taker’s expanded focus
group notes (from the discussion and the debriefing
session) are used:
• by moderators during the focus group discussions, to remind
themselves of questions they need to go back to, where they
need more complete information, etc.
• during debriefing sessions with other field staff and
investigators
• during transcription of focus group recordings, to clarify and
add contextual details to what participants have said.
How are focus group data used?
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
What forms qualitative
data take?
The types of data these three methods
generate are field notes, audio (and
sometimes video) recordings, and
transcripts.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Methodologies in Social Science
Studies
Dr. Qazi Muhammad Moinuddin
March 14, 2011
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Sampling in
Qualitative Research
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• In qualitative research, only a sample (that
is, a subset) of a population is selected for
any given study.
• The study’s research objectives and the
characteristics of the study population (such
as size and diversity) determine which and
how many people to select.
Sampling in Qualitative Research
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• There are three most common sampling
methods used in qualitative research:
• purposive sampling,
• quota sampling, and
• snowball sampling.
Sampling in Qualitative Research
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Purposive sampling
• This is most common sampling strategies.
• The participants are selected according to preselected criteria
relevant to a particular research question.
• Sample size, which may or may not be fixed prior to data
collection, depend on the resources and time available, as well
as the study’s objectives.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• Purposive sample sizes are often determined on the
basis of theoretical saturation (the point in data
collection when new data no longer bring additional
insights to the research questions).
• Purposive sampling is therefore most successful
when data review and analysis are done in
conjunction with data collection.
Purposive sampling
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Quota sampling
• Quota sampling, sometimes considered a type of
purposive sampling, is also common.
• In quota sampling, we decide while designing the
study how many people with which characteristics
to include as participants.
• Characteristics might include age, place of
residence, gender, class, profession, marital status,
etc.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
How do purposive and quota sampling differ?
• Purposive and quota sampling are similar in that they both
seek to identify participants based on selected criteria.
• Quota sampling is more specific with respect to sizes and
proportions of subsamples, with subgroups chosen to reflect
corresponding proportions in the population.
• For example, gender is a variable of interest in how people
experience e banking services, a quota sample would seek an
equal balance of e-banking services using by men and women in
a given city, assuming a 1:1 gender ratio in the population.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Snowball sampling
• A third type of sampling, snowballing – also known
as chain referral sampling – is considered a type of
purposive sampling.
• In this method, participants with whom contact has
already been made use their social networks to
refer the researcher to other people who could
potentially participate in or contribute to the study.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Snowball sampling is often used to find
and recruit “hidden populations,” that
is, groups not easily accessible to
researchers through other sampling
strategies.
Snowball sampling
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Ethics in Qualitative Research
• Research ethics deals primarily with the interaction between
researchers and the people they study.
• Professional ethics deals with additional issues such as
collaborative relationships among researchers, mentoring
relationships, intellectual property, fabrication of data and
plagiarism.
• While in academic research, we do not explicitly discuss
professional ethics.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Why is research ethics important in qualitative
research?
Whenever we conduct research on people, the well-
being of research participants must be our top
priority. The research question is always of
secondary importance. This means that if a choice
must be made between doing harm to a participant
and doing harm to the research, it is the research
that is sacrificed.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Informed Consent
• Informed consent is a mechanism for ensuring that
people understand what it means to participate in a
particular research study so they can decide in a
conscious, deliberate way whether they want to
participate.
• Informed consent is one of the most important tools
for ensuring respect for persons during research.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
How do we achieve informed consent for
qualitative research?
• The interviewee should be told:
• The purpose of the research
• What is expected of a research participant, including the
amount of time likely to be required for interview?
• Expected risks and benefits, including psychological and
social
• The fact that participation is voluntary and that one can
withdraw at any time with no negative repercussions
• How confidentiality will be protected
• The name and contact information of the local lead
investigator to be contacted for questions or problems
related to the research.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Emic and etic data
Emic and etic are terms used by
anthropologists, and by others in
the social and behavioural sciences to refer to
two different kinds of data concerning
human behaviour. In particular, they are
used in cultural anthropology, to refer to
kinds of fieldwork done and viewpoints
obtained.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
• An "emic" account is a description of behaviour or a
belief in terms meaningful (consciously or
unconsciously) to the actor; that is, an emic account
comes from within the culture. Almost anything from
within a culture can provide an emic account.
• An "etic" account is a description of a behaviour or
belief by an observer, in terms that can be applied to
other cultures; that is, an etic account is '"culturally
neutral".
Emic and etic data
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Example: Emic and Etic approaches to consumer behaviour
Emic and etic data
Emic approach refers to being culturally relevant and
specific with the product advertising. This is a difficult
task because generally products cross continents
because there is demand based on their current
positioning. Changing the product positioning when
advertising internationally might make the product
lose the reason it gained demand in the foreign
market in the first place.
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
McDonald’s is a great example of emic
product positioning. McDonald's
Corporation has introduced market-
specific products internationally, like
serving lamb BigMac in India, beer in
Germany, avocado sauce in Chile, etc.
Example: Etic approaches to consumer
behaviour
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Etic approach refers to keeping the advertising
culturally neutral in all parts of the world. This is
again a very daunting task. The etic approach
requires that the marketing strategy be so basic that
it does not matter in which part of the world it is
implemented. Keeping a marketing strategy basic
but still appealing is difficult, but when it is done well
it can save the company millions in costs, giving it a
competitive edge and, of course, larger profits.
Emic and etic data
Example: Etic and emic approaches to consumer behaviour
BY:MADDY.KALEEM
Success has come to coffee giant
Starbuck's, which has successfully
implemented the same store structure
of comfortable couches, soft lighting,
and strong coffee in various parts of the
world. They continue to advertise
globally based on their coffee expertise
and atmosphere.
Example: Etic approaches to consumer
behaviour
BY:MADDY.KALEEM

Qualitative research methodology 1

  • 1.
    Methodologies in SocialScience Studies BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 2.
    Research Methodology Methodologies arehigh-level approaches to conducting research. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 3.
    Research Methodology The individualsteps within the methodology might vary based on the research being performed. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 4.
    Common Methodologies •Two commonlyused research methodologies in Social Sciences or Science Policy and Management Studies are: •Quantitative and Qualitative BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 5.
    Common Methodologies Patent CitationAnalysis is a Purely Policy and Innovation Management tool to analyze the Science and Technology developments. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 6.
    Comparison Between Quantitative and QualitativeResearch Methodology BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 7.
    Comparing Quantitative and QualitativeResearch What are the basic differences between quantitative and qualitative research methods? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 8.
    Quantitative and qualitativeresearch methods differ primarily in: • Their analytical objectives • The types of questions they pose • The types of data collection instruments they use • The forms of data they produce • The degree of flexibility built into study design BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 9.
    Methodology Comparison • Quantitative •Explanation, prediction • Test theories • Known variables • Large sample • Standardized instruments • Deductive • Approach: Positivism • Qualitative • Explanation, description • Build theories • Unknown variables • Small sample • Observations, interviews • Inductive • Approach:Interpretivism BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
    • The keydifference between quantitative and qualitative methods is their Flexibility. • Generally, quantitative methods are fairly inflexible. Difference between Quantitative and Qualitative methods BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 14.
    With quantitative methodssuch as surveys and questionnaires, for example, researchers ask all participants identical questions in the same order. The response categories from which participants may choose are “closed-ended” or fixed. Difference between Quantitative and Qualitative methods BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 15.
    • The advantageof this inflexibility is that it allows for meaningful comparison of responses across participants and study sites. However, it requires a thorough understanding of the important questions to ask, the best way to ask them, and the range of possible responses. Difference between Quantitative and Qualitative methods BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 16.
    Qualitative methods aretypically more flexible – that is, they allow greater spontaneity and adaptation of the interaction between the researcher and the study participant. For example, Difference between Quantitative and Qualitative methods BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 17.
    For example, qualitativemethods ask mostly “open-ended” questions that are not necessarily worded in exactly the same way with each participant. With open-ended questions, participants are free to respond in their own words, and these responses tend to be more complex than simply “YES” or “NO.” Difference between Quantitative and Qualitative methods BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 18.
    • In addition,with qualitative methods, the relationship between the researcher and the participant is often less formal than in quantitative research. • Participants have the opportunity to respond more elaborately and in greater detail than is typically the case with quantitative methods. Difference between Quantitative and Qualitative methods BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 19.
    • In turn,researchers have the opportunity to respond immediately to what participants say by tailoring subsequent questions to information the participant has provided. • It is important to note, however, that there is a range of flexibility among methods used in both quantitative and qualitative research and that flexibility is not an indication of how scientifically rigorous a method is. • Rather, the degree of flexibility reflects the kind of understanding of the problem that is being pursued using the method. Difference between Quantitative and Qualitative methods BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 20.
  • 21.
    Introduction • Qualitative researchmethods are gaining popularity outside the traditional academic social sciences, particularly in public health and international development research. • Qualitative methods have become important tools within this broader approach to applied research, in large part because they provide valuable insights into the local perspectives of study populations. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 22.
    What is QualitativeResearch? • Qualitative Research is a type of scientific research. • In general terms, scientific research consists of an investigation that: • seeks answers to a question • Systematically uses a predefined set of procedures to answer the question • collects evidence • produces findings that were not determined in advance • produces findings that are applicable beyond the immediate boundaries of the study BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 23.
    • Qualitative researchalso seeks to understand a given research problem or topic from the perspectives of the local population it involves. • Qualitative research is especially effective in obtaining culturally specific information about the values, opinions, behaviours, and social contexts of particular populations. What is Qualitative Research? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 24.
    What can welearn from Qualitative Research? • The strength of qualitative research is its ability to provide complex textual descriptions of how people experience a given research issue. • It provides information about the “human” side of an issue – that is, the often contradictory behaviours, beliefs, opinions, emotions, and relationships of individuals. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 25.
    Qualitative methods arealso effective in identifying intangible factors, such as social norms, socioeconomic status, gender roles, ethnicity, and religion, whose role in the research issue may not be readily apparent. What can we learn from Qualitative Research? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 26.
    When used alongwith quantitative methods, qualitative research can help us to interpret and better understand the complex reality of a given situation and the implications of quantitative data. What can we learn from Qualitative Research? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 27.
    • Although findingsfrom qualitative data can often be extended to people with characteristics similar to those in the study population, gaining a rich and complex understanding of a specific social context or phenomenon typically takes precedence over eliciting data that can be generalized to other geographical areas or populations. • In this sense, qualitative research differs slightly from scientific research in general. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 28.
    Advantages of Qualitative Methods forExploratory Research BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 29.
    • One advantageof qualitative methods in exploratory research is that use of open-ended questions and probing gives participants the opportunity to respond in their own words, rather than forcing them to choose from fixed responses, as quantitative methods do. Advantages of Qualitative Methods for Exploratory Research BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 30.
    Open-ended questions havethe ability to evoke responses that are: • Meaningful and culturally salient to the participant • Unanticipated by the researcher • Rich and explanatory in nature Advantages of Qualitative Methods for Exploratory Research BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 31.
    Another advantage ofqualitative methods is that they allow the researcher the flexibility to probe initial participant responses – that is, to ask why or how. Advantages of Qualitative Methods for Exploratory Research BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 32.
    The researcher mustlisten carefully to what participants say, engage with them according to their individual personalities and styles, and use “probes” to encourage them to elaborate on their answers. Advantages of Qualitative Methods for Exploratory Research BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 33.
    Types of QualitativeResearch BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 34.
    What are QualitativeResearch Methods? • The Three most common qualitative methods are • participant observation, • in-depth interviews, and • focus groups. • Each method is particularly suited for obtaining a specific type of data. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 35.
    • Participant observation Thismethod appropriate for collecting data on naturally occurring behaviours in their usual contexts. What are Qualitative Research Methods? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 36.
    • In-depth interviews Theseare optimal for collecting data on individuals’ personal histories, perspectives, and experiences, particularly when sensitive topics are being explored. What are Qualitative Research Methods? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 37.
    • Focus groups Thesefocus groups are effective in eliciting data on the cultural norms of a group and in generating broad overviews of issues of concern to the cultural groups or subgroups represented. What are Qualitative Research Methods? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 38.
    Participant Observation What peoplesay they believe and say that they do are often contradicted by their behaviour. A large body of scientific literature documenting this disparity exists, and we can all likely summon examples from our own lives. Given the frequency of this very human inconsistency, observation can be a powerful check against what people report about themselves during interviews and focus groups. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 39.
    What is participantobservation? Participant observation is a qualitative method with roots in traditional ethnographic research, whose objective is to help researchers learn the perspectives held by study populations. As qualitative researchers, we presume that there will be multiple perspectives within any given community. We are interested both in knowing what those diverse perspectives are and in understanding the interplay among them. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 40.
    • Qualitative researchersaccomplish this through observation alone or by both observing and participating, to varying degrees, in the study community’s daily activities. • Participant observation always takes place in community settings, in locations believed to have some relevance to the research questions. What is participant observation? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 41.
    • The methodis distinctive because the researcher approaches participants in their own environment rather than having the participants come to the researcher. • Generally speaking, the researcher engaged in participant observation tries to learn what life is like for an “insider” while remaining, inevitably, an “outsider.” What is participant observation? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 42.
    • In thecommunity settings, researchers make careful, objective notes about what they see, recording all accounts and observations as field notes in a field notebook. • Informal conversation and interaction with members of the study population are also important components of the method and should be recorded in the field notes, in as much detail as possible. • Information and messages communicated through mass media such as radio or television may also be pertinent and thus desirable to document. What is participant observation? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 43.
    • Data obtainedthrough participant observation serve as a check against participants’ subjective reporting of what they believe and do. • Participant observation is also useful for gaining an understanding of the physical, social, cultural, and economic contexts in which study participants live; the relationships among and between people, contexts, ideas, norms, and events; and people’s behaviours and activities – what they do, how frequently, and with whom. What can we learn from participant observation? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 44.
    • Through participantobservation, researchers can also uncover factors important for a thorough understanding of the research problem but that were unknown when the study was designed. • This is the great advantage of the method because, although we may get truthful answers to the research questions we ask, we may not always ask the right questions. Thus, what we learn from participant observation can help us not only to understand data collected through other methods (such as interviews, focus groups, and quantitative research methods), but also to design questions for those methods that will give us the best understanding of the phenomenon being studied. What can we learn from participant observation? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 45.
    • The maindisadvantage of participant observation is that it is time-consuming. • A second disadvantage of participant observation is the difficulty of documenting the data – it is hard to write down everything that is important while you are in the act of participating and observing. What are the disadvantages of participant observation? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 46.
    • A thirddisadvantage of participant observation is that it is an inherently subjective exercise, whereas research requires objectivity. • It is therefore important to understand the difference between reporting or describing what you observe (more objective) versus interpreting what you see (less objective). • Filtering out personal biases may take some practice. One way to practice is to write down objective observations of a given event on one side of a page, and then offer more subjective interpretations of the same event on the other side of the page, as illustrated in the box at left. What are the disadvantages of participant observation? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 47.
  • 48.
    What form doparticipant observation data take? • In large part, participant observation data consist of the detailed field notes that the researcher records in a field notebook. • Although typically textual, such data may also include maps and other diagrams, such as kinship or organizational charts. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 49.
    In-Depth Interviews • In-depthinterviews are one of the most common qualitative methods. • One reason for their popularity is that they are very effective in giving a human face to research problems. • For participants –in-depth interviews offer the opportunity to express themselves in a way ordinary life rarely affords them. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 50.
    What is anin-depth interview? • The in-depth interview is a technique designed to elicit a vivid picture of the participant’s perspective on the research topic. • During in-depth interviews, the person being interviewed is considered the expert and the interviewer is considered the student. • The researcher’s interviewing techniques are motivated by the desire to learn everything the participant can share about the research topic. • Researchers engage with participants by posing questions in a neutral manner, listening attentively to participants’ responses, and asking follow-up questions and probes based on those responses. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 51.
    • In-depth interviewsare usually conducted face-to-face and involve one interviewer and one participant. • Phone conversations and interviews with more than one participant also qualify as in-depth interviews. What is an in-depth interview? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 52.
    What can welearn from in-depth interviews? • In-depth interviews are useful for learning about the perspectives of individuals. • They are an effective qualitative method for getting people to talk about their personal feelings, opinions, and experiences. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 53.
  • 54.
    Focus Groups • Focusgroups are a qualitative data collection method effective in helping researchers learn the social norms of a community or subgroup, as well as the range of perspectives that exist within that community or subgroup. • Focus groups are often used to determine what service or product a particular population wants or would like to have, such as in marketing studies. • Because focus groups seek to illuminate group opinion, the method is especially well suited for socio-behavioural research that will be used to develop and measure services that meet the needs of a given population. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 55.
    What is afocus group? • A focus group is a qualitative data collection method in which one or two researchers and several participants meet as a group to discuss a given research topic. • These sessions are usually tape-recorded, and sometimes videotaped. • One researcher (the moderator) leads the discussion by asking participants to respond to open-ended questions – that is, questions that require an in-depth response rather than a single phrase or simple “yes” or “no” answer. • A second researcher (the note-taker) takes detailed notes on the discussion. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 56.
    • A principaladvantage of focus groups is that they yield a large amount of information over a relatively short period of time. They are also effective for accessing a broad range of views on a specific topic, as opposed to achieving group consensus. • Focus groups are not the best method for acquiring information on highly personal or socially sensitive topics; one-on-one interviews are better-suited for such topics. What is a focus group? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 57.
  • 58.
    What can welearn from focus groups? • Focus groups are especially effective for capturing information about social norms and the variety of opinions or views within a population. • The richness of focus group data emerges from the group dynamic and from the diversity of the group. • Participants influence each other through their presence and their reactions to what other people say. Because not everyone will have the same views and experiences – because of differences in age, gender, education, access to resources, and other factors – many different viewpoints will likely be expressed by participants. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 59.
    What form dofocus group data take? • Focus group data consist of tape recordings, transcripts of those recordings, the moderator’s and note-taker’s notes from the discussion, and notes from the debriefing session held after the focus group. • Notes are initially handwritten in field notebooks, on the focus group guide, or on special forms. • After data collection, all handwritten notes are expanded into more complete narratives, then entered into a computer. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 60.
    How are focusgroup data used? • Typed transcripts are the most utilized form of focus group data. • During the data analysis phase of the research, after data collection, transcripts are coded according to participants’ responses to each question and/or to the most salient themes emerging across the set of focus groups. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 61.
    • The moderator’sand note-taker’s expanded focus group notes (from the discussion and the debriefing session) are used: • by moderators during the focus group discussions, to remind themselves of questions they need to go back to, where they need more complete information, etc. • during debriefing sessions with other field staff and investigators • during transcription of focus group recordings, to clarify and add contextual details to what participants have said. How are focus group data used? BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 62.
    What forms qualitative datatake? The types of data these three methods generate are field notes, audio (and sometimes video) recordings, and transcripts. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 63.
    Methodologies in SocialScience Studies Dr. Qazi Muhammad Moinuddin March 14, 2011 BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 64.
  • 65.
    • In qualitativeresearch, only a sample (that is, a subset) of a population is selected for any given study. • The study’s research objectives and the characteristics of the study population (such as size and diversity) determine which and how many people to select. Sampling in Qualitative Research BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 66.
    • There arethree most common sampling methods used in qualitative research: • purposive sampling, • quota sampling, and • snowball sampling. Sampling in Qualitative Research BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 67.
    Purposive sampling • Thisis most common sampling strategies. • The participants are selected according to preselected criteria relevant to a particular research question. • Sample size, which may or may not be fixed prior to data collection, depend on the resources and time available, as well as the study’s objectives. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 68.
    • Purposive samplesizes are often determined on the basis of theoretical saturation (the point in data collection when new data no longer bring additional insights to the research questions). • Purposive sampling is therefore most successful when data review and analysis are done in conjunction with data collection. Purposive sampling BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 69.
    Quota sampling • Quotasampling, sometimes considered a type of purposive sampling, is also common. • In quota sampling, we decide while designing the study how many people with which characteristics to include as participants. • Characteristics might include age, place of residence, gender, class, profession, marital status, etc. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 70.
    How do purposiveand quota sampling differ? • Purposive and quota sampling are similar in that they both seek to identify participants based on selected criteria. • Quota sampling is more specific with respect to sizes and proportions of subsamples, with subgroups chosen to reflect corresponding proportions in the population. • For example, gender is a variable of interest in how people experience e banking services, a quota sample would seek an equal balance of e-banking services using by men and women in a given city, assuming a 1:1 gender ratio in the population. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 71.
    Snowball sampling • Athird type of sampling, snowballing – also known as chain referral sampling – is considered a type of purposive sampling. • In this method, participants with whom contact has already been made use their social networks to refer the researcher to other people who could potentially participate in or contribute to the study. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 72.
    Snowball sampling isoften used to find and recruit “hidden populations,” that is, groups not easily accessible to researchers through other sampling strategies. Snowball sampling BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 73.
    Ethics in QualitativeResearch • Research ethics deals primarily with the interaction between researchers and the people they study. • Professional ethics deals with additional issues such as collaborative relationships among researchers, mentoring relationships, intellectual property, fabrication of data and plagiarism. • While in academic research, we do not explicitly discuss professional ethics. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 74.
    Why is researchethics important in qualitative research? Whenever we conduct research on people, the well- being of research participants must be our top priority. The research question is always of secondary importance. This means that if a choice must be made between doing harm to a participant and doing harm to the research, it is the research that is sacrificed. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 75.
    Informed Consent • Informedconsent is a mechanism for ensuring that people understand what it means to participate in a particular research study so they can decide in a conscious, deliberate way whether they want to participate. • Informed consent is one of the most important tools for ensuring respect for persons during research. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 76.
    How do weachieve informed consent for qualitative research? • The interviewee should be told: • The purpose of the research • What is expected of a research participant, including the amount of time likely to be required for interview? • Expected risks and benefits, including psychological and social • The fact that participation is voluntary and that one can withdraw at any time with no negative repercussions • How confidentiality will be protected • The name and contact information of the local lead investigator to be contacted for questions or problems related to the research. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 77.
    Emic and eticdata Emic and etic are terms used by anthropologists, and by others in the social and behavioural sciences to refer to two different kinds of data concerning human behaviour. In particular, they are used in cultural anthropology, to refer to kinds of fieldwork done and viewpoints obtained. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 78.
    • An "emic"account is a description of behaviour or a belief in terms meaningful (consciously or unconsciously) to the actor; that is, an emic account comes from within the culture. Almost anything from within a culture can provide an emic account. • An "etic" account is a description of a behaviour or belief by an observer, in terms that can be applied to other cultures; that is, an etic account is '"culturally neutral". Emic and etic data BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 79.
    Example: Emic andEtic approaches to consumer behaviour Emic and etic data Emic approach refers to being culturally relevant and specific with the product advertising. This is a difficult task because generally products cross continents because there is demand based on their current positioning. Changing the product positioning when advertising internationally might make the product lose the reason it gained demand in the foreign market in the first place. BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 80.
    McDonald’s is agreat example of emic product positioning. McDonald's Corporation has introduced market- specific products internationally, like serving lamb BigMac in India, beer in Germany, avocado sauce in Chile, etc. Example: Etic approaches to consumer behaviour BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 81.
    Etic approach refersto keeping the advertising culturally neutral in all parts of the world. This is again a very daunting task. The etic approach requires that the marketing strategy be so basic that it does not matter in which part of the world it is implemented. Keeping a marketing strategy basic but still appealing is difficult, but when it is done well it can save the company millions in costs, giving it a competitive edge and, of course, larger profits. Emic and etic data Example: Etic and emic approaches to consumer behaviour BY:MADDY.KALEEM
  • 82.
    Success has cometo coffee giant Starbuck's, which has successfully implemented the same store structure of comfortable couches, soft lighting, and strong coffee in various parts of the world. They continue to advertise globally based on their coffee expertise and atmosphere. Example: Etic approaches to consumer behaviour BY:MADDY.KALEEM

Editor's Notes

  • #3 The choice of methodology might be governed by the kind of research being conducted. For example, the hard sciences tend to favor quantitative methodologies whereas the social sciences often gravitate toward qualitative approaches. It’s quite common for both methodologies to be used during the course of a single research project.
  • #4 The choice of methodology might be governed by the kind of research being conducted. For example, the hard sciences tend to favor quantitative methodologies whereas the social sciences often gravitate toward qualitative approaches. It’s quite common for both methodologies to be used during the course of a single research project.
  • #10 These are some the differences in the intent and approaches between quantitative and qualitative research. There are other significant differences in approach as well, but these are some of the highlights. Keep in mind that research design is not a simple task.
  • #26 Intangible vague
  • #28 Eliciting extracting