Design & validation
of water systems.
Design of the system.
• Type of water-
-Purified water
-Water for injection
• Product to be manufactured
• Temperature of system
Water for injection.
• Distillation.
• Reverse osmosis.
However in the bulk pharmaceuticals and
biotechnology ultrafiltration is employed to
minimize endotoxins.
Water for injection.
• Some opthalmic irrigating solution and
inhalation products where there are pyrogen
specification.
• Otherwise purified water.
Purified water.
• Opthalmic.
• Inhalation.
• Oral.
• Topical.
• Cosmetics.
Temperature.
• Hot (65-80 c ) systems are self-sanitizing.
• Circulating water systems.
• One way water systems – “dead leg”
Risk assessment or level of quality.
• Parental requires very pure water with no
endotoxins.
• Topical and oral products – purified water
but preservatives in antacids are marginally
effective. Hence more stringent
microbial limits required.
• Add a microbial reduction step –
ultrafilteration.
System validation.
• Parental association technical report no.4
titled “design concept for validation of a
water for injection system”
- use of an appropriate challenge. In this
situation it would be undesirable to
introduce micro organisms into an online
system.
System validation.
• Hence reliance is placed on
- periodic testing for microbial quality
- installation of monitoring equipments at
specific check-points
Design qualification.
• Supply water source and specification
- periodic monitoring for inorganic and
radioactive traces.
• General environment – clean and tidy.
• System – leak and rust free, well
maintained.
Design qualification.
• System controls – electrical panels and
switches well protected.
• Access to the system restricted.
• Material of construction – pipes, tanks.
• Vender qualification – selection and
acceptance of specification.
Design qualification.
• Description of the system along with a
print.
• Drawing showing all the equipments from
water feed to point of use.
• Specifications for all the parts of system.
• Sampling points and their locations.
Design qualification.
• The print should be compared to the actual
systems annually to ensure its accuracy.
• To detect unreported changes.
• To confirm reported changes.
Installation qualifications.
• To ensure that all the design qualification
parameters are verified and confirmed
during actual installation of the system.
• All the changes during installation are
covered with change control system and
documented.
• All SOP’s are developed and authorised.
Operational qualifications.
• To demonstrate that system will
consistently produce the desired water
quality when operated in conformance with
SOP’s.
• The sampling and testing is performed for
initial phase and for the same time period.
• Data evaluated for its specification.
Performance qualifications.
• To demonstrate the water system is
operated in accordance to SOP’s over a
long period of time ( 1 year ).
• Variation in quality of feed water.
• Sampling and testing is performed
according to procedure and frequencies.
• Daily from one point of use with all points
of use tested weekly.
Performance qualifications.
• There must be a data to support SOP’s.
• There must be data demonstrating that
SOP’s are valid.
• There must be a data to support that
seasonal variations in feed water do not
adversely affect the operation of the system
or water quality.
Performance qualifications.
• Compilation of the data with conclusions
into the final report.
• Final report must be signed by the
appropriate people responsible for operation
and quality assurance of the water systems.
Review of validation.
• Validation performed according to schedule
protocol.
• Report indicates that the system is operating
in repeatable and reliable manner.
• Any non conformities indicated in the
report, explained and suitably authorized.
Microbial limits. (water for
injection)
• Essentially sterile.
• Occasionally low level count due to
sampling error may occur.
• Less than 10cfu/100ml is acceptable action
limit.
• None of the limits for water are pass / fail.
• All are action limits.
Microbial limits.
• When action limits are exceeded
- investigate the cause of problem.
- take action to correct the problem.
- asses the impact on product.
- document the results of investigation.
- prepare action plan.
Microbial limits.
• Sampling volume 100-300 ml preferred.
• Less than 100 ml unacceptable.
• Monitor for both endotoxins and
micro-organism.
Microbial limits ( purified water)
• Federal environmental protection agency
regulation for drinking water
- 500 micro-organisms / ml.
• USP action guideline – not greater than 100
organisms / ml.
• Purified water used to manufacture drug
products by cold process – free of
objectionable organisms.
Microbial limits.
• Objectionable organism
- can cause infections.
- capable of growth in drug products.
• As per guide to inspection of
microbiological pharmaceutical quality
control lab, the specific contaminants rather
than the number is more significant.
Microbial limits.
• Organisms exist in water systems.
- free floating.
- attached to the walls of pipes and
tanks – biofilm.
• Contamination not uniformly distributed.
• Pre treatment of feed water is recommended
for distillation equipment and is definitely
required for RO units.
Still.
• Malfunctioning of feed water wall and level
control results in droplets of feed water
being carried over in the distillate.
• 50 ltr of WFI in condenser remains at the
startup.
This leads to contamination.
Heat exchanger.
• Methods for preventing contamination due
to leakage.
- monitoring pressure differential to ensure
high pressure is always on the clean fluid
by gauges.
- double tube sheet type of heat exchanger.
• When not in use heat exchanger not to be
drained to avoid pinhole formation.
• Holding tank – vent filter integrity testing, readily
accessible.
• Pump – static or periodically operational –
accumulation of water in reservoir leads to
microbial contamination.
• Piping – high polished stainless steel.
- PVDF ( polyvinylidene fluoride ) requires
support, when heated tends to leak, deal legs and
no threaded fittings.
Reverse osmosis.
• Cold system.
• Filters are not absolute – at least two filters
be in series.
• No ball valves to be used – stagnant water.
• Ultrafiltration to be added.
• Filters are to be used with stated purpose.
Purified water system.
• Ozone utilization – for optimum effectiveness
dissolved ozone residue remains in the system.
- employee safety and use problem
• 0.2 micron line filter housing provides good
environment for contamination.
• UV light to be kept on continuously, glass sleeve
around the bulb must be kept clean – kills only
90% of the organisms entering the system.
Purified Water SystemPurified Water System

Purified Water System in Pharmaceuticals

  • 1.
    Design & validation ofwater systems.
  • 2.
    Design of thesystem. • Type of water- -Purified water -Water for injection • Product to be manufactured • Temperature of system
  • 3.
    Water for injection. •Distillation. • Reverse osmosis. However in the bulk pharmaceuticals and biotechnology ultrafiltration is employed to minimize endotoxins.
  • 4.
    Water for injection. •Some opthalmic irrigating solution and inhalation products where there are pyrogen specification. • Otherwise purified water.
  • 5.
    Purified water. • Opthalmic. •Inhalation. • Oral. • Topical. • Cosmetics.
  • 6.
    Temperature. • Hot (65-80c ) systems are self-sanitizing. • Circulating water systems. • One way water systems – “dead leg”
  • 7.
    Risk assessment orlevel of quality. • Parental requires very pure water with no endotoxins. • Topical and oral products – purified water but preservatives in antacids are marginally effective. Hence more stringent microbial limits required. • Add a microbial reduction step – ultrafilteration.
  • 8.
    System validation. • Parentalassociation technical report no.4 titled “design concept for validation of a water for injection system” - use of an appropriate challenge. In this situation it would be undesirable to introduce micro organisms into an online system.
  • 9.
    System validation. • Hencereliance is placed on - periodic testing for microbial quality - installation of monitoring equipments at specific check-points
  • 10.
    Design qualification. • Supplywater source and specification - periodic monitoring for inorganic and radioactive traces. • General environment – clean and tidy. • System – leak and rust free, well maintained.
  • 11.
    Design qualification. • Systemcontrols – electrical panels and switches well protected. • Access to the system restricted. • Material of construction – pipes, tanks. • Vender qualification – selection and acceptance of specification.
  • 12.
    Design qualification. • Descriptionof the system along with a print. • Drawing showing all the equipments from water feed to point of use. • Specifications for all the parts of system. • Sampling points and their locations.
  • 13.
    Design qualification. • Theprint should be compared to the actual systems annually to ensure its accuracy. • To detect unreported changes. • To confirm reported changes.
  • 14.
    Installation qualifications. • Toensure that all the design qualification parameters are verified and confirmed during actual installation of the system. • All the changes during installation are covered with change control system and documented. • All SOP’s are developed and authorised.
  • 15.
    Operational qualifications. • Todemonstrate that system will consistently produce the desired water quality when operated in conformance with SOP’s. • The sampling and testing is performed for initial phase and for the same time period. • Data evaluated for its specification.
  • 16.
    Performance qualifications. • Todemonstrate the water system is operated in accordance to SOP’s over a long period of time ( 1 year ). • Variation in quality of feed water. • Sampling and testing is performed according to procedure and frequencies. • Daily from one point of use with all points of use tested weekly.
  • 17.
    Performance qualifications. • Theremust be a data to support SOP’s. • There must be data demonstrating that SOP’s are valid. • There must be a data to support that seasonal variations in feed water do not adversely affect the operation of the system or water quality.
  • 18.
    Performance qualifications. • Compilationof the data with conclusions into the final report. • Final report must be signed by the appropriate people responsible for operation and quality assurance of the water systems.
  • 19.
    Review of validation. •Validation performed according to schedule protocol. • Report indicates that the system is operating in repeatable and reliable manner. • Any non conformities indicated in the report, explained and suitably authorized.
  • 20.
    Microbial limits. (waterfor injection) • Essentially sterile. • Occasionally low level count due to sampling error may occur. • Less than 10cfu/100ml is acceptable action limit. • None of the limits for water are pass / fail. • All are action limits.
  • 21.
    Microbial limits. • Whenaction limits are exceeded - investigate the cause of problem. - take action to correct the problem. - asses the impact on product. - document the results of investigation. - prepare action plan.
  • 22.
    Microbial limits. • Samplingvolume 100-300 ml preferred. • Less than 100 ml unacceptable. • Monitor for both endotoxins and micro-organism.
  • 23.
    Microbial limits (purified water) • Federal environmental protection agency regulation for drinking water - 500 micro-organisms / ml. • USP action guideline – not greater than 100 organisms / ml. • Purified water used to manufacture drug products by cold process – free of objectionable organisms.
  • 24.
    Microbial limits. • Objectionableorganism - can cause infections. - capable of growth in drug products. • As per guide to inspection of microbiological pharmaceutical quality control lab, the specific contaminants rather than the number is more significant.
  • 25.
    Microbial limits. • Organismsexist in water systems. - free floating. - attached to the walls of pipes and tanks – biofilm. • Contamination not uniformly distributed. • Pre treatment of feed water is recommended for distillation equipment and is definitely required for RO units.
  • 26.
    Still. • Malfunctioning offeed water wall and level control results in droplets of feed water being carried over in the distillate. • 50 ltr of WFI in condenser remains at the startup. This leads to contamination.
  • 27.
    Heat exchanger. • Methodsfor preventing contamination due to leakage. - monitoring pressure differential to ensure high pressure is always on the clean fluid by gauges. - double tube sheet type of heat exchanger. • When not in use heat exchanger not to be drained to avoid pinhole formation.
  • 28.
    • Holding tank– vent filter integrity testing, readily accessible. • Pump – static or periodically operational – accumulation of water in reservoir leads to microbial contamination. • Piping – high polished stainless steel. - PVDF ( polyvinylidene fluoride ) requires support, when heated tends to leak, deal legs and no threaded fittings.
  • 29.
    Reverse osmosis. • Coldsystem. • Filters are not absolute – at least two filters be in series. • No ball valves to be used – stagnant water. • Ultrafiltration to be added. • Filters are to be used with stated purpose.
  • 30.
    Purified water system. •Ozone utilization – for optimum effectiveness dissolved ozone residue remains in the system. - employee safety and use problem • 0.2 micron line filter housing provides good environment for contamination. • UV light to be kept on continuously, glass sleeve around the bulb must be kept clean – kills only 90% of the organisms entering the system.
  • 31.