[Business Communication]
[Company Name]
Performance Appraisal
DEFINITION
Performance appraisal
• According to Flippo, a prominent personality in
the field of Human resources, "performance
appraisal is the systematic, periodic and an
impartial rating of an employee’s excellence in
the matters pertaining to his present job and his
potential for a better job."
 Provide a review of past work
performance.
 Establish lines of communication.
 Create an opportunity to discuss
professional development goals and
objectives.
NEED OF
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS
–Document employee performance.
–Document corrective action necessary to improve
work performance.
–It is the supervisor’s and manager’s responsibility
to monitor, evaluate and coach employees.
PURPOSES OF PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL
• To review the performance of the
employees.
• To judge the gap between the actual and
the desired performance.
• To help the management in exercising
organizational control.
• To diagnose the training and development
needs of the future.
• Provide information to assist in the HR
decisions like promotions, transfers etc.
• Provide clarity of the expectations and
responsibilities of the functions to be
performed by the employees.
• To judge the effectiveness of the other
human resource functions.
• To reduce the grievances of the employees.
• Helps to strengthen the relationship and
communication between superior –
subordinates and management –
employees.
WORK RELATED OBJECTIVES
–To provide a control for
work done
–To improve efficiency
–To help in assigning work
and plan future work
assignment; and
–To carry out job
evaluation
CAREER DEVELOPMENT
OBJECTIVES
– To identify strong and weak points and
encourage finding remedies for weak
points through training;
– To determine career potential;
– To plan developmental( promotional or
lateral) assignments; and
– To plan career goals
OBJECTIVES OF COMMUNICATION
• To provide adequate feedback on
performance;
• To clearly establish goals, i.e what is
expected of the staff members in terms
of performance and future work
assignments;
• To provide counseling and job
satisfaction through open discussion on
performance and
• To let employees assess where they
stand within the organization in terms
of their performance.
ADMINISTRATIVE OBJECTIVES
• To attend as a basis for promotion or
demotion;
• To serve as a basis for allocating
incentives;
• To serve as a basis for determining
transfers ; and
• To serve as a basis for termination in case
of reduction of staff.
AIMS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
• Give employee feedback.
• Identify employee training need
• Document criteria.
• Form a basis for personnel: salary increases,
promotions, disciplinary actions, bonuses, etc.
• Provide the opportunity for organizational diagnosis and
development
• Facilitate communication
• Validate selection techniques and human resource
policies.
USE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
SYSTEM
Raises, Merit
Pay, Bonuses
Personnel
Decisions(
e.g.
promotion,
transfer,
dismissal)
Identification
of training
needs
Research
purposes
ELEMENTS OF PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL
Setting performance
goals and objectives
Determining key
competencies
Measurement of
performance
against the goals
and objectives
Measurement of
performance
against key
competencies,
Feedback of
results.
Amendment to
goals and
objectives
CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
• The philosophy, purpose, and
objectives of the organization are
clearly stated so that performance
appraisal tools can be designed to
reflect these.
• The purposes of performance
appraisal are identified,
communicated, and understood.
• Job descriptions are written in such
a manner that standards of job
performance can be identified for
each job.
• The appraisal tool used is suited to the
purposes for which it will be utilized and is
accompanied by clear instructions for its use.
• Evaluators are trained in the use of the tool.
• The performance appraisal procedure is
outlined, communicated and understood.
• Plans for policing the appraisal procedure and
evaluating appraisal tools are developed and
implemented. Performance appraisal has the
full support of top management.
• Performance appraisal is considered to be fair
and productive by all who participate in it.
RESISTANCE ON THE PART OF
EVALUATOR BECAUSE:
• Performance appraisal demands
too much of supervisors efforts
in terms of time, paperwork,
and periodic observation of
subordinates’ performance.
• Supervisors do not fully
understand the purposes and
procedures of performance
appraisal.
• Supervisors lack skills in appraisal
techniques.
• Performance appraisal is not perceived as
being productive.
• Evaluator biases and rating errors.
• Lack of clear, objective standards of
performance.
• Failure to communicate purposes and
• Lack of suitable appraisal tool.
• Failure to police the appraisal procedure
effectively.
DEVELOP THE STANDARDS FOR
EVALUATION
Performance standards are:
• Based on the position, not the individual
• Observable, specific indicators of success
• Meaningful, reasonable and attainable
• Describe “fully satisfactory” performance
once trained
• Expressed in terms of quantity, quality,
timeliness, cost, safety or outcomes
SETTING OBJECTIVES
• Specific
• Performance oriented
• Realistic
• Observable
DATA COLLECTION
• Sources of performance information
– Personal observation
– Reports, documentation, correspondence. Etc.
– Feedback (internal and external)
– Periodic discussions with employee
Step by step Guide to Performance Appraisals
Develop performance standards
Setting goals and objectives
Data collection
Performance appraisal interview
Future goals and objectives
Follow up
Rewarding performance
Benefits of Performance Appraisal
Organization
• Recognize and manage staff performance
• Planning and decision making
• Improve staff retention
Appraiser
• Framework for sharing feedback
• Promote career planning for staff (Chandra & Frank, 2004)
• Feedback on own management style and leadership skills (Parkin &
McKimm, 2009)
Benefits of Performance Appraisal
Appraisee
• Reflection on areas of weakness and strengths (Finlay &
Mclaren, 2009)
• Opportunity to raise issues / complications
• Focus on developing individual performance
• Better understanding of goals and requirements
• Identify action plan for future development
• Indication for Salary increment / incentives (Parkin & McKimm,
2009)
Types of appraisal
Management By Objectives (MBO)
• A method in which managers or employers set a list
of objectives and make assessments on their
performance on a regular basis, and finally make
rewards based on the results achieved (Nandy, 2011)
• This method mostly cares about the results achieved
(goals) but not to the way how employees can fulfill
them.
360 Degree Performance Appraisal
• A method that employees will give confidential and
unidentified assessments on their colleagues. A
method that employees will give confidential and
anonymous assessments on their colleagues. It’s also
known as multi-rater feedback, multi source
feedback, or multi source assessment
Types of appraisal
Performance Ranking Method
• Used to assess the working performance of employees from the highest to lowest
levels
• Managers will make comparisons of an employee with the others, instead of making
comparison of each employee with some certain standards (Dhami, 2010)
Peer Review Appraisal
• A way to more effectively gauge the performance of employees by establishing
relevant evaluation criteria, using those best equipped to speak about individual’s
work to grade him / her accordingly
• Peer review can take the form of disciplinary panels or ongoing feedback between
co-workers (Lovering, 2006)
• This method helps to enhance employee trust and communication
Disadvantages of Performance Appraisal
• If not done right, they can create a NEGATIVE EXPERIENCE.
• Performance appraisals are very time consuming and can be
crushing to managers with many employees.
• They are based on human assessment and are subject to rater
errors and biases.
• They can create a very stressful environment for everyone
involved.
Assign to appraise
Higher Management
Performance
Appraisal
Change
in rating
Existing
state of
affairs
Approach in re-appraisal
Know your organization appraisal tools well
Analyze the objective and subjective data. To substantiate rating, get ready
the subordinate’s reference records such as incident reports, anecdotal
entries, etc. (Dessler, 2003).
Objective Data Subjective Data
Management by objectives (MBO)
Key Results Area (KRA)
Interview staff & previous appraiser in order to
find out the reason for their grievances
1) Personality clash with previous appraiser
2) Possible error in rating
3) Provide listening ear
Unreliable entries
Peer review - more accurate appraisal
(Nankervis, Compton & Baird, 2002)
(Raymond, 2009)
Review Employee’s Performance
Is there a problem?
No
Give feedback
as appropriateYes
Root causes
Skill Related
• Provide education
• Coach
• Simplify task
• Reassign
Motivation related
• Clarify expectation
• Determine obstacle and remove them
• Remove punishment
• Determine subordinate value regarding
rewards
(Sullivan & Decker, 2005)
Performance Appraisal : past-oriented methods
Rating scale
Confidential report
Essay evaluation
Critical incident method
Checklists
Forced choice method
Behaviorally anchored rating scale
Ranking
Paired comparison method
Forced distribution method
 Field review technique
Performance Appraisal : past-oriented methods
Rating scale
Confidential report
Essay evaluation
Critical incident method
Checklists
Forced choice method
Behaviorally anchored rating scale
Ranking
Paired comparison method
Forced distribution method
 Field review technique
Rating scale
The rating scale consist of several
numerical scales, each representing a job
related performance criterion such as
dependability, initiative, output,
attendance, attitude, co-operation
Example:
Employee name_________ Dept_______
Rater’s name ___________ Date________
_____________________________________________________________________
_________
Exc. Good Acceptable Fair Poor
______________________5_______4________3__________2______1________
___________
 Dependability
 Initiative
 Overall output
 Attendance
 Attitude
 Cooperation
__________________________________________________________________
_________
Confidential Report
Descriptive report
 Prepared by the employee’s immediate supervisor
 The report highlights the strengths and weaknesses of employees
 Prepared in Government organizations
 Does not offer any feedback to the employee
Essay Evaluation Method
 The rater is asked to express the strong as well as weak points of
employee’s behavior
The rater considers the employee’s :
 Job knowledge and potential
 Understanding of company’s programs, policies, objectives etc
 Relation with co-workers and supervisors
 Planning, organizing and controlling ability
 Attitude and perception
Essay Evaluation
 This method has the following limitations:
 Highly subjective
 Supervisor may write biased essay
 Difficult to find effective writers
 A busy appraiser may write the essay hurriedly without
assessing properly the actual performance of the worker
 If the appraiser takes a long time it becomes uneconomical
from the view point of the firm
Critical Incident Technique
 Manager prepares lists of statements of very effective and
ineffective behavior of an employee
 These critical incidents represent the outstanding or poor
behavior of the employees
 The manager periodically records critical incidents of
employee’s behavior
Critical Incident Technique
Example:
 June 21 - Sales clerk patiently attended to the customers complaint.
He
is polite, prompt, enthusiastic in solving the customers’ problem
 June 21 - The sales assistant stayed 45 minutes beyond his break
during
the busiest part of the day. He failed to answer store manager’s call
thrice. He is lazy, negligent, stubborn and uninterested in work
Ex: A fire, sudden breakdown, accident
Workers reaction scale
A informed the supervisor immediately 4
B Become anxious on loss of output 3
C tried to repair the machine 2
D Complained for poor maintenance 1
Critical Incident Technique
Limitation of this technique are:
 Negative incidents may be more noticeable than positive
incidents.
 Results in very close supervision which may not be liked by the
employee.
 The recording of incidents is a routine for the supervisor
concerned who may be too busy or forget to do it.
Checklist
 Checklist contains a list of statements on the basis of which
the rater describes the on job performance of the employees
 Example:
 Is employee regular Y/N
 Is employee respected by subordinate Y/N
 Is employee helpful Y/N
 Does he follow instruction Y/N
 Does he keep the equipment in order Y/N
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale
 BARS represent a range of descriptive statements of behavior varying
from the least to the most effective
 In this a rater is expected to indicate which behavior on each scale best
describes an employee’s performance
Example:
Performance Points Behavior
Extremely good 7 Can expect trainee to make valuable suggestions for increased sales
and to have positive relationships with customers all over the country.
Good 6 Can expect to initiate creative ideas for improved sales.
Above average 5 Can expect to keep in touch with the customers throughout the year.
Average 4 Can manage, with difficulty, to deliver the goods in time.
Below average 3 Can expect to unload the trucks when asked by the supervisor.
Poor 2 Can expect to inform only a part of the customers.
Extremely poor 1 Can expect to take extended coffee breaks and roam around
purposelessly.
Forced Choice Method
In the forced choice method the rater is forced to select
statements which are readymade
The rater is asked to indicate which of the phrases is the
most and least descriptive of a particular worker
Favorable qualities earn plus credit and
unfavorable ones earn the reverse
Example:
Criteria Rating
1.Regularity on the job Most Least
 Always regular
 Inform in advance for delay
 Never regular
 Remain absent
 Neither regular nor irregular
Forced Distribution method
Example:
10% 20% 40% 20% 10%
poor Below
average
average good Excellent
No.
of
employees
Force distribution curve
Paired comparison method
 For several traits paired comparisons are made, tabulated and then
rank is assigned to each worker
 No. of comparisons is calculated by the formula: N(N-1)/2
 This method is not applicable when the group is large
Ranking method
The evaluator rates the employee from highest to lowest on some overall
criteria. In this “how” and “why” are not questioned nor answered
Employee Rank
A 2
B 1
C 3
D 5
E 4
Field Review Method
 The appraiser goes to the field and obtains the information
about work performance of the employee by way of
questioning the said individual, his peer group, and his
superiors
Conclusion
• There is NO ONE PERFECT appraisal tool
• Compilation record of positive or negative incidents are useful in
justifying PPA rating
• Appropriate communication skills used are REALLY essential
• Constant evaluation and feedback should be given to subordinate to
enhance expectation on performance and progress and to avoid
surprises during PPA.

Performance appraisal

  • 1.
  • 2.
    DEFINITION Performance appraisal • Accordingto Flippo, a prominent personality in the field of Human resources, "performance appraisal is the systematic, periodic and an impartial rating of an employee’s excellence in the matters pertaining to his present job and his potential for a better job."
  • 3.
     Provide areview of past work performance.  Establish lines of communication.  Create an opportunity to discuss professional development goals and objectives. NEED OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS
  • 4.
    –Document employee performance. –Documentcorrective action necessary to improve work performance. –It is the supervisor’s and manager’s responsibility to monitor, evaluate and coach employees.
  • 5.
    PURPOSES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL •To review the performance of the employees. • To judge the gap between the actual and the desired performance. • To help the management in exercising organizational control. • To diagnose the training and development needs of the future.
  • 6.
    • Provide informationto assist in the HR decisions like promotions, transfers etc. • Provide clarity of the expectations and responsibilities of the functions to be performed by the employees. • To judge the effectiveness of the other human resource functions. • To reduce the grievances of the employees. • Helps to strengthen the relationship and communication between superior – subordinates and management – employees.
  • 7.
    WORK RELATED OBJECTIVES –Toprovide a control for work done –To improve efficiency –To help in assigning work and plan future work assignment; and –To carry out job evaluation
  • 8.
    CAREER DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES – Toidentify strong and weak points and encourage finding remedies for weak points through training; – To determine career potential; – To plan developmental( promotional or lateral) assignments; and – To plan career goals
  • 9.
    OBJECTIVES OF COMMUNICATION •To provide adequate feedback on performance; • To clearly establish goals, i.e what is expected of the staff members in terms of performance and future work assignments; • To provide counseling and job satisfaction through open discussion on performance and • To let employees assess where they stand within the organization in terms of their performance.
  • 10.
    ADMINISTRATIVE OBJECTIVES • Toattend as a basis for promotion or demotion; • To serve as a basis for allocating incentives; • To serve as a basis for determining transfers ; and • To serve as a basis for termination in case of reduction of staff.
  • 11.
    AIMS OF PERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL • Give employee feedback. • Identify employee training need • Document criteria. • Form a basis for personnel: salary increases, promotions, disciplinary actions, bonuses, etc. • Provide the opportunity for organizational diagnosis and development • Facilitate communication • Validate selection techniques and human resource policies.
  • 12.
    USE OF PERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL SYSTEM Raises, Merit Pay, Bonuses Personnel Decisions( e.g. promotion, transfer, dismissal) Identification of training needs Research purposes
  • 13.
    ELEMENTS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Settingperformance goals and objectives Determining key competencies Measurement of performance against the goals and objectives Measurement of performance against key competencies, Feedback of results. Amendment to goals and objectives
  • 14.
    CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL • The philosophy, purpose, and objectives of the organization are clearly stated so that performance appraisal tools can be designed to reflect these. • The purposes of performance appraisal are identified, communicated, and understood. • Job descriptions are written in such a manner that standards of job performance can be identified for each job.
  • 15.
    • The appraisaltool used is suited to the purposes for which it will be utilized and is accompanied by clear instructions for its use. • Evaluators are trained in the use of the tool. • The performance appraisal procedure is outlined, communicated and understood. • Plans for policing the appraisal procedure and evaluating appraisal tools are developed and implemented. Performance appraisal has the full support of top management. • Performance appraisal is considered to be fair and productive by all who participate in it.
  • 16.
    RESISTANCE ON THEPART OF EVALUATOR BECAUSE: • Performance appraisal demands too much of supervisors efforts in terms of time, paperwork, and periodic observation of subordinates’ performance. • Supervisors do not fully understand the purposes and procedures of performance appraisal.
  • 17.
    • Supervisors lackskills in appraisal techniques. • Performance appraisal is not perceived as being productive. • Evaluator biases and rating errors. • Lack of clear, objective standards of performance. • Failure to communicate purposes and • Lack of suitable appraisal tool. • Failure to police the appraisal procedure effectively.
  • 18.
    DEVELOP THE STANDARDSFOR EVALUATION Performance standards are: • Based on the position, not the individual • Observable, specific indicators of success • Meaningful, reasonable and attainable • Describe “fully satisfactory” performance once trained • Expressed in terms of quantity, quality, timeliness, cost, safety or outcomes
  • 19.
    SETTING OBJECTIVES • Specific •Performance oriented • Realistic • Observable
  • 20.
    DATA COLLECTION • Sourcesof performance information – Personal observation – Reports, documentation, correspondence. Etc. – Feedback (internal and external) – Periodic discussions with employee
  • 21.
    Step by stepGuide to Performance Appraisals Develop performance standards Setting goals and objectives Data collection Performance appraisal interview Future goals and objectives Follow up Rewarding performance
  • 22.
    Benefits of PerformanceAppraisal Organization • Recognize and manage staff performance • Planning and decision making • Improve staff retention Appraiser • Framework for sharing feedback • Promote career planning for staff (Chandra & Frank, 2004) • Feedback on own management style and leadership skills (Parkin & McKimm, 2009)
  • 23.
    Benefits of PerformanceAppraisal Appraisee • Reflection on areas of weakness and strengths (Finlay & Mclaren, 2009) • Opportunity to raise issues / complications • Focus on developing individual performance • Better understanding of goals and requirements • Identify action plan for future development • Indication for Salary increment / incentives (Parkin & McKimm, 2009)
  • 24.
    Types of appraisal ManagementBy Objectives (MBO) • A method in which managers or employers set a list of objectives and make assessments on their performance on a regular basis, and finally make rewards based on the results achieved (Nandy, 2011) • This method mostly cares about the results achieved (goals) but not to the way how employees can fulfill them. 360 Degree Performance Appraisal • A method that employees will give confidential and unidentified assessments on their colleagues. A method that employees will give confidential and anonymous assessments on their colleagues. It’s also known as multi-rater feedback, multi source feedback, or multi source assessment
  • 25.
    Types of appraisal PerformanceRanking Method • Used to assess the working performance of employees from the highest to lowest levels • Managers will make comparisons of an employee with the others, instead of making comparison of each employee with some certain standards (Dhami, 2010) Peer Review Appraisal • A way to more effectively gauge the performance of employees by establishing relevant evaluation criteria, using those best equipped to speak about individual’s work to grade him / her accordingly • Peer review can take the form of disciplinary panels or ongoing feedback between co-workers (Lovering, 2006) • This method helps to enhance employee trust and communication
  • 26.
    Disadvantages of PerformanceAppraisal • If not done right, they can create a NEGATIVE EXPERIENCE. • Performance appraisals are very time consuming and can be crushing to managers with many employees. • They are based on human assessment and are subject to rater errors and biases. • They can create a very stressful environment for everyone involved.
  • 27.
    Assign to appraise HigherManagement Performance Appraisal Change in rating Existing state of affairs
  • 28.
    Approach in re-appraisal Knowyour organization appraisal tools well Analyze the objective and subjective data. To substantiate rating, get ready the subordinate’s reference records such as incident reports, anecdotal entries, etc. (Dessler, 2003). Objective Data Subjective Data Management by objectives (MBO) Key Results Area (KRA) Interview staff & previous appraiser in order to find out the reason for their grievances 1) Personality clash with previous appraiser 2) Possible error in rating 3) Provide listening ear Unreliable entries Peer review - more accurate appraisal (Nankervis, Compton & Baird, 2002) (Raymond, 2009)
  • 29.
    Review Employee’s Performance Isthere a problem? No Give feedback as appropriateYes Root causes Skill Related • Provide education • Coach • Simplify task • Reassign Motivation related • Clarify expectation • Determine obstacle and remove them • Remove punishment • Determine subordinate value regarding rewards (Sullivan & Decker, 2005)
  • 30.
    Performance Appraisal :past-oriented methods Rating scale Confidential report Essay evaluation Critical incident method Checklists Forced choice method Behaviorally anchored rating scale Ranking Paired comparison method Forced distribution method  Field review technique
  • 31.
    Performance Appraisal :past-oriented methods Rating scale Confidential report Essay evaluation Critical incident method Checklists Forced choice method Behaviorally anchored rating scale Ranking Paired comparison method Forced distribution method  Field review technique
  • 32.
    Rating scale The ratingscale consist of several numerical scales, each representing a job related performance criterion such as dependability, initiative, output, attendance, attitude, co-operation
  • 33.
    Example: Employee name_________ Dept_______ Rater’sname ___________ Date________ _____________________________________________________________________ _________ Exc. Good Acceptable Fair Poor ______________________5_______4________3__________2______1________ ___________  Dependability  Initiative  Overall output  Attendance  Attitude  Cooperation __________________________________________________________________ _________
  • 34.
    Confidential Report Descriptive report Prepared by the employee’s immediate supervisor  The report highlights the strengths and weaknesses of employees  Prepared in Government organizations  Does not offer any feedback to the employee
  • 35.
    Essay Evaluation Method The rater is asked to express the strong as well as weak points of employee’s behavior The rater considers the employee’s :  Job knowledge and potential  Understanding of company’s programs, policies, objectives etc  Relation with co-workers and supervisors  Planning, organizing and controlling ability  Attitude and perception
  • 36.
    Essay Evaluation  Thismethod has the following limitations:  Highly subjective  Supervisor may write biased essay  Difficult to find effective writers  A busy appraiser may write the essay hurriedly without assessing properly the actual performance of the worker  If the appraiser takes a long time it becomes uneconomical from the view point of the firm
  • 37.
    Critical Incident Technique Manager prepares lists of statements of very effective and ineffective behavior of an employee  These critical incidents represent the outstanding or poor behavior of the employees  The manager periodically records critical incidents of employee’s behavior
  • 38.
    Critical Incident Technique Example: June 21 - Sales clerk patiently attended to the customers complaint. He is polite, prompt, enthusiastic in solving the customers’ problem  June 21 - The sales assistant stayed 45 minutes beyond his break during the busiest part of the day. He failed to answer store manager’s call thrice. He is lazy, negligent, stubborn and uninterested in work
  • 39.
    Ex: A fire,sudden breakdown, accident Workers reaction scale A informed the supervisor immediately 4 B Become anxious on loss of output 3 C tried to repair the machine 2 D Complained for poor maintenance 1
  • 40.
    Critical Incident Technique Limitationof this technique are:  Negative incidents may be more noticeable than positive incidents.  Results in very close supervision which may not be liked by the employee.  The recording of incidents is a routine for the supervisor concerned who may be too busy or forget to do it.
  • 41.
    Checklist  Checklist containsa list of statements on the basis of which the rater describes the on job performance of the employees  Example:  Is employee regular Y/N  Is employee respected by subordinate Y/N  Is employee helpful Y/N  Does he follow instruction Y/N  Does he keep the equipment in order Y/N
  • 42.
    Behaviorally Anchored RatingScale  BARS represent a range of descriptive statements of behavior varying from the least to the most effective  In this a rater is expected to indicate which behavior on each scale best describes an employee’s performance
  • 43.
    Example: Performance Points Behavior Extremelygood 7 Can expect trainee to make valuable suggestions for increased sales and to have positive relationships with customers all over the country. Good 6 Can expect to initiate creative ideas for improved sales. Above average 5 Can expect to keep in touch with the customers throughout the year. Average 4 Can manage, with difficulty, to deliver the goods in time. Below average 3 Can expect to unload the trucks when asked by the supervisor. Poor 2 Can expect to inform only a part of the customers. Extremely poor 1 Can expect to take extended coffee breaks and roam around purposelessly.
  • 44.
    Forced Choice Method Inthe forced choice method the rater is forced to select statements which are readymade The rater is asked to indicate which of the phrases is the most and least descriptive of a particular worker Favorable qualities earn plus credit and unfavorable ones earn the reverse
  • 45.
    Example: Criteria Rating 1.Regularity onthe job Most Least  Always regular  Inform in advance for delay  Never regular  Remain absent  Neither regular nor irregular
  • 46.
    Forced Distribution method Example: 10%20% 40% 20% 10% poor Below average average good Excellent No. of employees Force distribution curve
  • 47.
    Paired comparison method For several traits paired comparisons are made, tabulated and then rank is assigned to each worker  No. of comparisons is calculated by the formula: N(N-1)/2  This method is not applicable when the group is large
  • 48.
    Ranking method The evaluatorrates the employee from highest to lowest on some overall criteria. In this “how” and “why” are not questioned nor answered Employee Rank A 2 B 1 C 3 D 5 E 4
  • 49.
    Field Review Method The appraiser goes to the field and obtains the information about work performance of the employee by way of questioning the said individual, his peer group, and his superiors
  • 50.
    Conclusion • There isNO ONE PERFECT appraisal tool • Compilation record of positive or negative incidents are useful in justifying PPA rating • Appropriate communication skills used are REALLY essential • Constant evaluation and feedback should be given to subordinate to enhance expectation on performance and progress and to avoid surprises during PPA.

Editor's Notes

  • #23 Organization: The performance appraisal assist the employees to reach to his/her full potential. Discussion on the employee’s career advancement will also takes place. An organization will likely to retain its employee if a clear career path is identified - Appraiser: PA allow sharing of feedback work performance and how the staff can do better. It allows the supervisor to discuss and plan future performance through the use of learning objectives. Since it is a 2 way communication, PA allow feedback on appraiser own management and leadership skills.
  • #24 Organization: The performance appraisal assist the employees to reach to his/her full potential. Discussion on the employee’s career advancement will also takes place. An organization will likely to retain its employee if a clear career path is identified - Appraiser: PA allow sharing of feedback work performance and how the staff can do better. It allows the supervisor to discuss and plan future performance through the use of learning objectives. Since it is a 2 way communication, PA allow feedback on appraiser own management and leadership skills.
  • #27 Organization: The performance appraisal assist the employees to reach to his/her full potential. Discussion on the employee’s career advancement will also takes place. An organization will likely to retain its employee if a clear career path is identified - Appraiser: PA allow sharing of feedback work performance and how the staff can do better. It allows the supervisor to discuss and plan future performance through the use of learning objectives. Since it is a 2 way communication, PA allow feedback on appraiser own management and leadership skills.