ABSTRACT
In this article, I aim to answer important questions regarding Parkinson’s disease and the associated dementia. While the
disease was identified and described over a century ago, we still have not as yet been able to ferret out its root cause,
notwithstanding the tremendous progress made in recent years. Like for many other diseases, it is believed to involve three
main causal components (inherited genetics, environmental influences, and, to a much lesser extent, lifestyle choices),
which collectively determine if someone will develop the disease. I will survey its signs, symptoms (motor and non-motor),
risks, and stages, distinguishing between the disease’s early- and late-onset. While discriminating between the disease and
its associated dementia, I will localize the latter within the broad spectrum of dementias. I will also describe what happens
to the brain as the disease takes hold and evolves. A number of medical conditions called Parkinsonisms may have one or
more of their signs and symptoms mimicking Parkinson’s. I will discuss them in some detail, including their five proposed
mechanisms (protein aggregation in Lewy bodies, disruption of autophagy, mitophagy, neuroinflammation, and breakdown
of the blood–brain barrier). I will further describe the approach to diagnosis, prediction, prevention, and prognosis. While
there is no cure and treatment for each affected person, motor symptoms are managed with several medications (Levodopa
always combined with a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor and sometimes also with a catechol-O-methyltransferase [COMT]
inhibitor, dopamine agonists, and monoamine oxidase-B [MAOB]-inhibitors) and eventually surgical therapy. Numerous
pharmaceutical agents are also available for individual non-motor symptoms (L-Dopa emulsions, non-ergot dopamine
agonists, cholinesterase inhibitors for dementia, modafinil for daytime sleepiness, and quetiapine for psychosis). Fortunately,
we can track the drug effectiveness with exosomes. Keeping in mind patients and their caregivers/partners, I will outline
available complementary therapies, palliative care, and rehabilitation, measures they can take beyond seeking standard
treatments, and supporting and advocating organizations at their disposal. Finally, I will survey promising new research
vistas in the field.
Parkinson’s disease, commonly referred to simply as “Parkinson’s,” is a movement disorder that affects the central nervous system, impairing bodily functions
Parkinson’s disease, commonly referred to simply as “Parkinson’s,” is a movement disorder that affects the central nervous system, impairing bodily functions
This presentation will cover definition and classifications of psychosis and schizophrenia, symptom dimensions, etiopathogenesis, risk factors and prognosis and management approaches.
This is a very basic presentation for anyone who would like to have more information about schizophrenia. This was intended for the third year medical students. The criteria described are based on fourth edition of the DSM ( DSMIV). All these demarcations (types of) schizophrenia will be scrapped by the DSM V (this is the proposal as of now). But this could serve a historical puspose if seen after 2013.
This presentation will cover definition and classifications of psychosis and schizophrenia, symptom dimensions, etiopathogenesis, risk factors and prognosis and management approaches.
This is a very basic presentation for anyone who would like to have more information about schizophrenia. This was intended for the third year medical students. The criteria described are based on fourth edition of the DSM ( DSMIV). All these demarcations (types of) schizophrenia will be scrapped by the DSM V (this is the proposal as of now). But this could serve a historical puspose if seen after 2013.
Running head SCHIZOPHRENIA MENTAL DISORDER .docxtoltonkendal
Running head: SCHIZOPHRENIA MENTAL DISORDER 1
SCHIZOPHRENIA MENTAL DISORDER 2
Schizophrenia Mental Disorder
Student’s Name
Course Name
Instructor’s Name
University Affiliation
Schizophrenia Mental Disorder
Introduction
Schizophrenia is a type of psychological illness. It is a chronic and unembellished mental disorder that mainly distresses an individual’s thinking, norms as well as to their extent of sensation. According to modern day research, reports indicates that persons who have schizophrenia might appear as if they have misplaced touch with realism. However, much it is not collective as in comparison with the other mental disorders, its symptoms seem to be much disabling in nature (Miller, 2012). An example is a reduction of a person’s pleasure in their daily undertakings. It raises the question; what can a man do in the absence of desire and affection in all their doings? From the information as already mentioned above, this paper takes turn providing an enhanced analysis of the mental disorder disease – Schizophrenia.
Signs and Symptoms
In close to all the reported cases, signs and symptoms of schizophrenia often start from ages ranging between 16 and 30. There are however fewer cases that the disease has identification among the children. In this paper, it classifies the symptoms and signs into three categories. They include the positive, negative, as well as to the cognitive symptoms as illustrated below.
Positive signs:
In this category, they have a regard for psychotic norms. It means that it is hard to depict the signs commonly in people who are living a healthy lifestyle. However, the given individuals might tend to part ways with their connectivity with different components of reality. The symptoms might include: -
· Delusions
· Agitated movements of the body in a disorderly manner
· Hallucinations
· Unfamiliar perspective of thinking entailing disorderly thoughts and imaginations
Negative symptoms:
In this set, symptoms have a closer affiliation with disturbances to both the common behaviors as well as to particular emotions (Mueser, 2011). The symptoms comprise of: -
· Condensed level of speaking
· Reduction in the extent of both pleasure and feelings in a person’s everyday life undertakings
· Decline on the voice tone as well as the ordinary portrayal of emotions
· Hardships in commencing and sustaining of various activities
Cognitive symptoms:
In this set of symptoms, it varies from one given an individual to the other. To certain people, the symptoms are observable as being delicate in nature. On the other hand, the symptoms prove to be extra severe (Weiberger et al., 2011). In such situations, the affected persons are capable of recognizing alterations in either the facets of thinking and imagination, as well as to variations in their memory. Examples of symptoms ...
Research Paper on Schizophrenia: Perversion of the Human MindPaul Pasco
This is a research paper I wrote on schizophrenia during my undergraduate public health course at Drew University. The paper contains an overview of the disease, its prevalence, and different subtypes.
During my 1st &2nd year of residency period , i used to teach Anatomy and Orthopaedics for foreign undergraduate medical students. At last year i taught Neurology for one batch. so i posted some of my collections for competely educational purpose coz i believe in knowledge ...inseted of deleting these ppts , they may me useful for others so i shared it ....
Parkinsons Disease Symptoms, Causes and Treatment.pdfMYMMJDOCTOR3
Parkinson’s Disease refers to a progressive nervous system disorder, which affects the movement of a person.
The symptoms of the Disease begin gradually, and sometimes the symptoms start with a barely noticeable tremor in hand. These tremors are common, but they may lead to stiffness or slowing of movement.
Convalescent Plasma and COVID-19: Ancient Therapy Re-emergedasclepiuspdfs
Convalescent plasma has again re-emerged as a therapy during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreaks currently use as a prophylactic or an interventional treatment in infected patients. Convalescent plasma has been used in the 20th century confronting different infectious diseases where there was no other therapy available. Conceivably, this convalescent plasma therapy tends to be proving a game-changing treatment in some COVID-19 patients and could support treatment, in addition to the current interventions before other developed therapies are available for the population.
The Negative Clinical Consequences Due to the Lack of the Elaboration of a Sc...asclepiuspdfs
Until a few years ago, the immune system was considered as responsible for the only defense against microbial infections and other external agents. On the contrary, the immune cells have been proven to be linked not only through cell-cell contact but also by releasing proteins capable of influencing the immune-inflammatory response, the so-called cytokines or interleukins. Moreover, the cytokines have appeared to play not only immune activities but also metabolic and systemic effects influencing the overall biological systems, including the nervous, the endocrine, and the cardiovascular systems, by representing the main endogenous molecules responsible for the maintenance of the unity of the biological life. Therefore, only the systematic clinical consideration of cytokine effects may allow the generation of real future holistic medicine.
The great benefit of blood/blood constitutes therapy is the ability to provide transfusion support for patients with many unique hematologic conditions. For some patients, such as patients with sickle cell disease, thalassemia major, immune hemolytic anemia, anemia of kidney disease, and aplastic anemia may need for this consolidation extends throughout their life. By knowing the alteration mechanisms of these conditions, we can appreciate the stationary, urgency, and the value of the transfused red blood cell (RBC).
Decreasing or Increasing Role of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Mult...asclepiuspdfs
During the past four decades, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been the first choice and the standard option for the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. The introduction of new agents such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib has led to a clear improvement in basic approach and those agents became the standard of care in the induction phase; however, they were not able to play the role of ASCT in term of progression-free survival and overall survival. Debate continues about the best induction, consolidation, and maintenance taking into account the toxicities of these new agents. The new monoclonal antibody (anti CD38) starts to take its place in the induction setting and it seems to be a promising agent in the high-risk group. Until recently, ASCT is the standard treatment for newly diagnosed patients.
Comparison of the Hypocalcemic Effects of Erythropoietin and U-74389Gasclepiuspdfs
Aim: This study calculated the effects on serum calcium (Ca) levels, after treatment with either of two drugs: The erythropoietin (Epo) and the antioxidant lazaroid (L) drug U-74389G. The calculation was based on the results of two preliminary studies, each one of which estimated the certain influence, after the respective drug usage in an induced ischemia-reperfusion animal experiment. Materials and Methods: The two main experimental endpoints at which the serum Ca levels were evaluated were the 60th reperfusion min (for the Groups A, C, and E) and the 120th reperfusion min (for the Groups B, D, and F). Especially, the Groups A and B were processed without drugs, Groups C and D after Epo administration, whereas Groups E and F after the L administration. Results: The first preliminary study of Epo presented a non-significant hypocalcemic effect by 0.34% ± 0.68% (P = 0.6095). However, the second preliminary study of U-74389G presented a non-significant hypercalcemic effect by 0.14% ± 0.66% (P = 0.8245). These two studies were coevaluated since they came from the same experimental setting. The outcome of the coevaluation was that L is 2.3623042-fold (2.3482723–2.3764196) more hypercalcemic than Epo (P = 0.0000). Conclusions: The antioxidant capacities of U-74389G ascribe 2.3623042-fold more hypercalcemic effects than Epo (P = 0.0000).
The term refractory anemia (RA) may be confusing to those who are not hematologists. RA should be well defined because it means more than what it says. RA is defined as anemia that is not responsive to therapy except transfusion.[1] The term RA is used to rule out those types of anemia with a known cause such as anemia of systemic diseases (liver and kidney) and anemia of inflammation even though they are considered refractory to therapy.[2] RA with cellular or hypercellular bone marrow was formerly used to exclude aplastic anemia.
Management of Immunogenic Heparin-induced Thrombocytopeniaasclepiuspdfs
Immunogenic heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune response to heparin associated with significant morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients if unidentified as soon as possible, due to thromboembolic complications involving both arterial and venous systems. Early diagnoses based on a comprehensive interpretation of clinical and laboratory information improve clinical outcomes. Management principles of strongly suspected HIT should not be delayed for laboratory result confirmation. Treatment strategies have been introduced including new, safe, and effective agents. This review summarizes the clinical therapeutic options for HIT addressing the use of parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors and indirect factor Xa inhibitors as well as the potential non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants.
73-year-old woman without any pertinent history was admitted to the hospital due to remittent fever with erythema. She showed itching and linearly arranged erythema on the chest, back, and abdomen [Figure 1a and b]. As she had been taking daily cefditoren pivoxil for the 4 days before her admission, she was diagnosed as having drug-related scratch dermatitis, and the antibiotic treatment was stopped. Her fever remained. Laboratory data showed elevated levels of white blood cells (14,800/μl, normal range 4000–7000) and liver enzymes such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 138 IU/L (normal range 5–40), alanine aminotransferase 97 IU/L (normal range 5–35), and ferritin (17469.5 ng/mL, normal range 5–152).
Bone Marrow Histology is a Pathognomonic Clue to Each of the JAK2V617F, MPL,5...asclepiuspdfs
According to the World Health Organization and Clinical Laboratory Molecular and Pathological criteria bone marrow pathology in JAK2V617F mutated trilinear myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera are indistinguishably featured by clustered medium to large pleomorphic megakaryocytes and increased cellularity (60–90%) due to increased erythropoiesis and megakaryopoiesis. MPL515 mutated ET is the second distinct clonal MPN characterized by thrombocythemia in a normocellular bone marrow showing clustered increased large to giant mature megakaryocytes with staghorn-like hyperlobulated nuclei. Calreticulin (CALR) mutated hypercellular thrombocythemia associated with prefibrotic megakaryocytic, granulocytic myeloproliferation (MGM) recently became the third distinct MPN featured by dense clusters of immature megakaryocytes with cloud-like nuclei. Bone marrow pathology in newly diagnosed MPN patients appears to be a pathognomonic clue for diagnostic differentiation between JAK2V617F mutated trilinear MPN, MPL515 normocellular thrombocythemia, and CALR thrombocythemia with MGM characteristics followed by secondary reticulin fibrosis. Their natural histories clearly differ featured by an increase of erythro/granulopoiesis and cellularity in JAK2V617F, decrease of erythropoiesis and cellularity in MPL515 and increase of dual megakaryo/granulopoiesis and cellularity in CALR mutated MPN.
Helicobacter pylori Frequency in Polycythemia Vera Patients without Dyspeptic...asclepiuspdfs
Introduction: In polycythemia vera (PV) patients, peptic ulcer and gastroduodenal erosions are more common than the general population, but there are insufficient data on the frequency of Helicobacter pylori (HP) and its role in etiopathogenesis. In this study, we aimed to compare the prevalence of HP infection in PV patients without dyspeptic complaints with a healthy control group without dyspeptic complaints. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with PV without dyspeptic complaints and 50 controls without dyspeptic complaints were enrolled in this study after informed consent obtained. Stool samples of selected patients were analyzed using HP stool antigen test (True Line®). Results: There was surprisingly striking difference between HP prevalence in PV patients without dyspeptic complaints and asymptomatic healthy controls (64% vs. 2%) (P < 0.05). There was no significant relationship found between HP presence and age, gender, treatment modalities, complete blood count, positivity of JAK2 V617F, serum erythropoietin level, and splenomegaly in PV patients (P > 0.05). Conclusion: As the susceptibility of HP infections in PV patients are higher, it is recommended to have close surveillance of these patients by screening HP presence. In addition, when HP positivity is determined, the eradication of HP is essential to prevent possible future gastrointestinal lesions in patients with PV.
Lymphoma of the Tonsil in a Developing Communityasclepiuspdfs
The lymphoma of the tonsil is a rarity. Single case reports have appeared in countries as disparate as China, Greece, India, Japan, and Turkey. Therefore, this paper presents cases found in Nigeria among the Ibo ethnic group. The epidemiological comparisons are deemed to be worthy of documentation such as age ranges and sides of involvement.
Should Metformin Be Continued after Hospital Admission in Patients with Coron...asclepiuspdfs
Background: In most patients with diabetes, guidelines recommend discontinuation of oral anti-diabetic agents. Preliminary data suggest that pre-admission metformin use may have a mortality benefit in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 admitted to the hospital. Objective: The objective of the study was to review the impact of metformin on morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods: Review of English literature by PUBMED search until November 10, 2020. Search terms included diabetes, COVID-19, metformin, retrospective studies, meta-analyses, pertinent reviews, pre-print articles, and consensus guidelines are reviewed.
Clinical Significance of Hypocalcemia in COVID-19asclepiuspdfs
Background: Preliminary data suggest that hypocalcemia is common among patients with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital. Objective: The objective of the study was to examine the clinical significance of hypocalcemia in the setting of COVID-19. Methods: Literature search (PubMed) until August 5, 2020. Search terms include hypocalcemia, COVID-19, mortality, and complications. Retrospective studies are reviewed due to a lack of randomized trials. Results: Prevalence of hypocalcemia among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 ranges from 62% to 78%, depending on the definition of hypocalcemia and patients’ characteristics. In most cases, hypocalcemia is mild to moderate biochemically. Hypocalcemia is a risk factor for hospitalization of patients with COVID-19. In already hospitalized patients, hypocalcemia is significantly associated with increase severity of COVID-19 and its complications, including multiorgan failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and death. Hypocalcemia is significantly correlated with inflammatory markers of COVID-19. Causes of hypocalcemia in COVID-19 patients are unclear, but Vitamin D deficiency may be a contributing factor. Conclusion: Hypocalcemia is common in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and carries unfavorable outcomes. Further studies are needed to examine the causes of hypocalcemia in COVID-19 and to see whether normalization of circulating calcium levels improves prognosis.
Excess of Maternal Transmission of Type 2 Diabetes: Is there a Role of Bioche...asclepiuspdfs
Objective: An excess of maternal transmission of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been reported in some populations but not confirmed in other studies. Mitochondrial inheritance has been proposed to explain such excess. In the present paper, we have considered the presence of T2D in the mother and/or in the father in relation to the risk of T2D and to age at onset of the disease in the offspring. The distribution of two genetic polymorphisms involved in glucose metabolism in relation to the presence of T2D in the mother has been also considered. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and seventy-nine participants with T2D were studied in the population of Penne, a small rural town in the eastern side of central Italy. Adenosine deaminase locus 1 (ADA1) and phosphoglucomutase locus 1 (PGM1) phenotypes were determined by starch gel electrophoresis. Statistical analyses were carried out using commercial software (SPSS). Results: The proportion of patients from T2D mothers is much greater as compared to the proportion of the patients from T2D fathers (P < 0.0001). Age at onset of the disease in patients in whom one or both parents are T2D is lower as compared to other patients. The distribution of ADA1 and PGM1 phenotypes in participants with T2D depends on the presence of diabetes in the mother. Conclusions: About the transmission of T2D, our data confirm the high proportion of maternal T2D and show the role of two common biochemical polymorphisms involved in glucose metabolism.
The Effect of Demographic Data and Hemoglobin A 1c on Treatment Outcomes in P...asclepiuspdfs
Objective: Diabetes mellitus, the most common cause of non-traumatic foot amputations, is a life-threatening condition due to its high mortality and morbidity. In our study, we retrospectively evaluated our patients with diabetic foot syndrome in our clinic. Materials and Methods: The demographic data, duration of diabetes, Wagner classification, haemoglobin A 1c (HbA1c) levels, white blood cell, C-reactive protein sedimentation levels, hospital stay, and treatment results were evaluated retrospectively in 14 patients with diabetic foot between January 2017 and December 2018. Results: The mean age of the patients was 62.43 ± 7.7 years. Of the 14 patients, 3 were females and 11 were males. All 14 patients were type 2 diabetes mellitus. When diabetic foot Wagner classification was performed, 6 patients were evaluated as Wagner 2, five patients were Wagner 3, and three patients were evaluated as Wagner 4. Nine patients had complete amputation and 3 had vascular surgery. Conclusion: Although the level of HbA1c is below the target level, the risk of diabetic foot is increased when there is no adequate diabetes mellitus foot training. Inadequate diabetic patient education and hospitalization of patients after infection progress the amputation rate.
Self-efficacy Impact Adherence in Diabetes Mellitusasclepiuspdfs
The aim of the paper is to explore how self-efficacy (SE) is associated with adherence among adults with diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: The search of electronic databases identified 564 records from 2007 to 2017 on SE and adherence from different perspectives and its effect on adults with DM. Discussions: SE increases the confidence in adults in their self-care behaviors. Non-adherence continues to be a significant barrier to SE. SE and adherence should be informed by an understanding of theoretical frameworks and the individual characteristics. Conclusion: Adherence is likely among adults with better SE to empower them to make valid decisions about their health. Interventions to improve SE should be tailored based on different types of non-adherence such as intentional and unintentional non-adherence. Implications: An intercollaborative professional practice approach is crucial to improve SE and adherence for sound judgment and valid decision-making.
Uncoiling the Tightening Obesity Spiralasclepiuspdfs
While an underweight prevalence was once more than twice that of obesity, now more people are obese than underweight. Obesity is one of the leading causes of preventable death in the world. There are an estimated 2,100,000,000 obese people worldwide and that number is forecast to grow to 51% of the world’s population by 2030. Escalating obesity-related disease costs threaten to bankrupt the world’s health-care systems.
Prevalence of Chronic Kidney disease in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome in S...asclepiuspdfs
Background and Objective: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) which is an increasingly important clinical and public health issue is associated with cardiovascular disease. Epidemiologic studies have also linked metabolic syndrome (MetS) with an increased risk of incident CKD. Therefore, the present study was designed retrospectively to find the prevalence and potential risk factors of CKD in patients with MetS in Saudi Arabia.
Management Of Hypoglycemia In Patients With Type 2 Diabetesasclepiuspdfs
Hypoglycemia is the rate-limiting step of intensive management in patients with diabetes. Lowering one’s A1C to a prescribed target is expected to mitigate one’s risk of developing long- and short-term diabetes-related complications. Several of the less expensive and commonly prescribed glucose lowering agents favored by practitioners result in weight gain, hypoglycemia, and even an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Although achieving a targeted A1C of <7 % is the standard of care, clinicians often fail to evaluate patients for glycemic variability which can increase oxidative stress driving long-term diabetes-related complications including CV death. The use of concentrated insulins and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists separately or in combination with each other reduces glycemic variability and one’s risk of hypoglycemia. Pharmaceutical agents which allow patients to safely achieve their targeted A1C without weight gain and hypoglycemia should be preferred in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Predictive and Preventive Care: Metabolic Diseasesasclepiuspdfs
South Asians have a very high incidence of ischemic heart disease and stroke. In addition, they also have a very high incidence of metabolic diseases such as prehypertension, hypertension, visceral obesity, metabolic syndrome, prediabetes, type-2 diabetes, and its clinical complications. Currently, there are over 75 million diabetic subjects in India and an equal number of prediabetics. Republic of China has taken over India as the diabetes capital of the world, with over 115 million diabetics. Modern medicine is disease focused and has failed to address the prevention of these chronic diseases. According to the reports from the United Nations (Millennium Development Goals [MDGs], the World Health Organization, Global Health Initiatives, and the non-communicable disease risk task force), obesity has increased by 2-fold and type-2 diabetes by 4-fold worldwide. Experts in this field predict that chances of meeting the MDGs set by the UN members of reducing the incidence of these diseases at 2025 to the level of 2020 are very little. Western medicine has failed to reduce or reverse the trend in the incidence of these diseases. We feel that an integrated approach to health care may be a better option, to reduce the disease burden in developing and resource-poor countries. Having said that, one cannot prevent something that one is not aware of, as such it is the need of the hour for us, to develop a robust predictive and preventive health-care platform. In an earlier article, we presented our views on reducing or reversing cardiometabolic diseases. There is great enthusiasm among the health-care providers and professional bodies that integration of emerging technologies will help develop personalized, precision medicine, as well as reduce the cost of health-care worldwide.
Recomendações da OMS sobre cuidados maternos e neonatais para uma experiência pós-natal positiva.
Em consonância com os ODS – Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável e a Estratégia Global para a Saúde das Mulheres, Crianças e Adolescentes, e aplicando uma abordagem baseada nos direitos humanos, os esforços de cuidados pós-natais devem expandir-se para além da cobertura e da simples sobrevivência, de modo a incluir cuidados de qualidade.
Estas diretrizes visam melhorar a qualidade dos cuidados pós-natais essenciais e de rotina prestados às mulheres e aos recém-nascidos, com o objetivo final de melhorar a saúde e o bem-estar materno e neonatal.
Uma “experiência pós-natal positiva” é um resultado importante para todas as mulheres que dão à luz e para os seus recém-nascidos, estabelecendo as bases para a melhoria da saúde e do bem-estar a curto e longo prazo. Uma experiência pós-natal positiva é definida como aquela em que as mulheres, pessoas que gestam, os recém-nascidos, os casais, os pais, os cuidadores e as famílias recebem informação consistente, garantia e apoio de profissionais de saúde motivados; e onde um sistema de saúde flexível e com recursos reconheça as necessidades das mulheres e dos bebês e respeite o seu contexto cultural.
Estas diretrizes consolidadas apresentam algumas recomendações novas e já bem fundamentadas sobre cuidados pós-natais de rotina para mulheres e neonatos que recebem cuidados no pós-parto em unidades de saúde ou na comunidade, independentemente dos recursos disponíveis.
É fornecido um conjunto abrangente de recomendações para cuidados durante o período puerperal, com ênfase nos cuidados essenciais que todas as mulheres e recém-nascidos devem receber, e com a devida atenção à qualidade dos cuidados; isto é, a entrega e a experiência do cuidado recebido. Estas diretrizes atualizam e ampliam as recomendações da OMS de 2014 sobre cuidados pós-natais da mãe e do recém-nascido e complementam as atuais diretrizes da OMS sobre a gestão de complicações pós-natais.
O estabelecimento da amamentação e o manejo das principais intercorrências é contemplada.
Recomendamos muito.
Vamos discutir essas recomendações no nosso curso de pós-graduação em Aleitamento no Instituto Ciclos.
Esta publicação só está disponível em inglês até o momento.
Prof. Marcus Renato de Carvalho
www.agostodourado.com
Title: Sense of Taste
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the structure and function of taste buds.
Describe the relationship between the taste threshold and taste index of common substances.
Explain the chemical basis and signal transduction of taste perception for each type of primary taste sensation.
Recognize different abnormalities of taste perception and their causes.
Key Topics:
Significance of Taste Sensation:
Differentiation between pleasant and harmful food
Influence on behavior
Selection of food based on metabolic needs
Receptors of Taste:
Taste buds on the tongue
Influence of sense of smell, texture of food, and pain stimulation (e.g., by pepper)
Primary and Secondary Taste Sensations:
Primary taste sensations: Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter, Umami
Chemical basis and signal transduction mechanisms for each taste
Taste Threshold and Index:
Taste threshold values for Sweet (sucrose), Salty (NaCl), Sour (HCl), and Bitter (Quinine)
Taste index relationship: Inversely proportional to taste threshold
Taste Blindness:
Inability to taste certain substances, particularly thiourea compounds
Example: Phenylthiocarbamide
Structure and Function of Taste Buds:
Composition: Epithelial cells, Sustentacular/Supporting cells, Taste cells, Basal cells
Features: Taste pores, Taste hairs/microvilli, and Taste nerve fibers
Location of Taste Buds:
Found in papillae of the tongue (Fungiform, Circumvallate, Foliate)
Also present on the palate, tonsillar pillars, epiglottis, and proximal esophagus
Mechanism of Taste Stimulation:
Interaction of taste substances with receptors on microvilli
Signal transduction pathways for Umami, Sweet, Bitter, Sour, and Salty tastes
Taste Sensitivity and Adaptation:
Decrease in sensitivity with age
Rapid adaptation of taste sensation
Role of Saliva in Taste:
Dissolution of tastants to reach receptors
Washing away the stimulus
Taste Preferences and Aversions:
Mechanisms behind taste preference and aversion
Influence of receptors and neural pathways
Impact of Sensory Nerve Damage:
Degeneration of taste buds if the sensory nerve fiber is cut
Abnormalities of Taste Detection:
Conditions: Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Dysgeusia (parageusia)
Causes: Nerve damage, neurological disorders, infections, poor oral hygiene, adverse drug effects, deficiencies, aging, tobacco use, altered neurotransmitter levels
Neurotransmitters and Taste Threshold:
Effects of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) on taste sensitivity
Supertasters:
25% of the population with heightened sensitivity to taste, especially bitterness
Increased number of fungiform papillae
Title: Sense of Smell
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the primary categories of smells and the concept of odor blindness.
Explain the structure and location of the olfactory membrane and mucosa, including the types and roles of cells involved in olfaction.
Describe the pathway and mechanisms of olfactory signal transmission from the olfactory receptors to the brain.
Illustrate the biochemical cascade triggered by odorant binding to olfactory receptors, including the role of G-proteins and second messengers in generating an action potential.
Identify different types of olfactory disorders such as anosmia, hyposmia, hyperosmia, and dysosmia, including their potential causes.
Key Topics:
Olfactory Genes:
3% of the human genome accounts for olfactory genes.
400 genes for odorant receptors.
Olfactory Membrane:
Located in the superior part of the nasal cavity.
Medially: Folds downward along the superior septum.
Laterally: Folds over the superior turbinate and upper surface of the middle turbinate.
Total surface area: 5-10 square centimeters.
Olfactory Mucosa:
Olfactory Cells: Bipolar nerve cells derived from the CNS (100 million), with 4-25 olfactory cilia per cell.
Sustentacular Cells: Produce mucus and maintain ionic and molecular environment.
Basal Cells: Replace worn-out olfactory cells with an average lifespan of 1-2 months.
Bowman’s Gland: Secretes mucus.
Stimulation of Olfactory Cells:
Odorant dissolves in mucus and attaches to receptors on olfactory cilia.
Involves a cascade effect through G-proteins and second messengers, leading to depolarization and action potential generation in the olfactory nerve.
Quality of a Good Odorant:
Small (3-20 Carbon atoms), volatile, water-soluble, and lipid-soluble.
Facilitated by odorant-binding proteins in mucus.
Membrane Potential and Action Potential:
Resting membrane potential: -55mV.
Action potential frequency in the olfactory nerve increases with odorant strength.
Adaptation Towards the Sense of Smell:
Rapid adaptation within the first second, with further slow adaptation.
Psychological adaptation greater than receptor adaptation, involving feedback inhibition from the central nervous system.
Primary Sensations of Smell:
Camphoraceous, Musky, Floral, Pepperminty, Ethereal, Pungent, Putrid.
Odor Detection Threshold:
Examples: Hydrogen sulfide (0.0005 ppm), Methyl-mercaptan (0.002 ppm).
Some toxic substances are odorless at lethal concentrations.
Characteristics of Smell:
Odor blindness for single substances due to lack of appropriate receptor protein.
Behavioral and emotional influences of smell.
Transmission of Olfactory Signals:
From olfactory cells to glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, involving lateral inhibition.
Primitive, less old, and new olfactory systems with different path
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...kevinkariuki227
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journeygreendigital
Tom Selleck, an enduring figure in Hollywood. has captivated audiences for decades with his rugged charm, iconic moustache. and memorable roles in television and film. From his breakout role as Thomas Magnum in Magnum P.I. to his current portrayal of Frank Reagan in Blue Bloods. Selleck's career has spanned over 50 years. But beyond his professional achievements. fans have often been curious about Tom Selleck Health. especially as he has aged in the public eye.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Many have been interested in Tom Selleck health. not only because of his enduring presence on screen but also because of the challenges. and lifestyle choices he has faced and made over the years. This article delves into the various aspects of Tom Selleck health. exploring his fitness regimen, diet, mental health. and the challenges he has encountered as he ages. We'll look at how he maintains his well-being. the health issues he has faced, and his approach to ageing .
Early Life and Career
Childhood and Athletic Beginnings
Tom Selleck was born on January 29, 1945, in Detroit, Michigan, and grew up in Sherman Oaks, California. From an early age, he was involved in sports, particularly basketball. which played a significant role in his physical development. His athletic pursuits continued into college. where he attended the University of Southern California (USC) on a basketball scholarship. This early involvement in sports laid a strong foundation for his physical health and disciplined lifestyle.
Transition to Acting
Selleck's transition from an athlete to an actor came with its physical demands. His first significant role in "Magnum P.I." required him to perform various stunts and maintain a fit appearance. This role, which he played from 1980 to 1988. necessitated a rigorous fitness routine to meet the show's demands. setting the stage for his long-term commitment to health and wellness.
Fitness Regimen
Workout Routine
Tom Selleck health and fitness regimen has evolved. adapting to his changing roles and age. During his "Magnum, P.I." days. Selleck's workouts were intense and focused on building and maintaining muscle mass. His routine included weightlifting, cardiovascular exercises. and specific training for the stunts he performed on the show.
Selleck adjusted his fitness routine as he aged to suit his body's needs. Today, his workouts focus on maintaining flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular health. He incorporates low-impact exercises such as swimming, walking, and light weightlifting. This balanced approach helps him stay fit without putting undue strain on his joints and muscles.
Importance of Flexibility and Mobility
In recent years, Selleck has emphasized the importance of flexibility and mobility in his fitness regimen. Understanding the natural decline in muscle mass and joint flexibility with age. he includes stretching and yoga in his routine. These practices help prevent injuries, improve posture, and maintain mobilit
HOT NEW PRODUCT! BIG SALES FAST SHIPPING NOW FROM CHINA!! EU KU DB BK substit...GL Anaacs
Contact us if you are interested:
Email / Skype : kefaya1771@gmail.com
Threema: PXHY5PDH
New BATCH Ku !!! MUCH IN DEMAND FAST SALE EVERY BATCH HAPPY GOOD EFFECT BIG BATCH !
Contact me on Threema or skype to start big business!!
Hot-sale products:
NEW HOT EUTYLONE WHITE CRYSTAL!!
5cl-adba precursor (semi finished )
5cl-adba raw materials
ADBB precursor (semi finished )
ADBB raw materials
APVP powder
5fadb/4f-adb
Jwh018 / Jwh210
Eutylone crystal
Protonitazene (hydrochloride) CAS: 119276-01-6
Flubrotizolam CAS: 57801-95-3
Metonitazene CAS: 14680-51-4
Payment terms: Western Union,MoneyGram,Bitcoin or USDT.
Deliver Time: Usually 7-15days
Shipping method: FedEx, TNT, DHL,UPS etc.Our deliveries are 100% safe, fast, reliable and discreet.
Samples will be sent for your evaluation!If you are interested in, please contact me, let's talk details.
We specializes in exporting high quality Research chemical, medical intermediate, Pharmaceutical chemicals and so on. Products are exported to USA, Canada, France, Korea, Japan,Russia, Southeast Asia and other countries.
These simplified slides by Dr. Sidra Arshad present an overview of the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract.
Learning objectives:
1. Enlist the non-respiratory functions of the respiratory tract
2. Briefly explain how these functions are carried out
3. Discuss the significance of dead space
4. Differentiate between minute ventilation and alveolar ventilation
5. Describe the cough and sneeze reflexes
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 39, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 34, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
3. Chapter 17, Human Physiology by Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
4. Non-respiratory functions of the lungs https://academic.oup.com/bjaed/article/13/3/98/278874
Explore natural remedies for syphilis treatment in Singapore. Discover alternative therapies, herbal remedies, and lifestyle changes that may complement conventional treatments. Learn about holistic approaches to managing syphilis symptoms and supporting overall health.
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/lK81BzxMqdo
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/Ve4P0COk9OI
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Oleg Kshivets
RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2252.1±1742.5 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 73.2%, 10 years – 64.8%, 20 years – 42.5%. 513 LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3124.6±1525.6 days), 148 LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5054.4±1504.1 days).199 LCP died because of LC (LS=562.7±374.5 days). 5YS of LCP after bi/lobectomies was significantly superior in comparison with LCP after pneumonectomies (78.1% vs.63.7%, P=0.00001 by log-rank test). AT significantly improved 5YS (66.3% vs. 34.8%) (P=0.00000 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time (P=0.000-0.038). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12 (rank=2), thrombocytes/CC (3), erythrocytes/CC (4), eosinophils/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10); leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0).
CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) LC cell dynamics; 10) surgery type: lobectomy/pneumonectomy; 11) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracic surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis.
2. Fymat: Parkinson’s: The disease and what can be done about it
2 Clinical Research in Neurology • Vol 3 • Issue 2 • 2020
and does not seem to run in families. Nonetheless, while
it has not been proven to be hereditary, it has been noted
that those with a family member affected are more likely
to get the disease themselves.[4-6]
Some studies have
proposed that it is more common in men than women
(about 50% more), but others failed to detect any
differences between the two sexes.
WHAT CAUSES PARKINSON’S?
The motor symptoms of the disease result from the death of
nerve cells (neurons) in the substantia nigra, a region of the
midbrain that controls movement. Normally, these neurons
produce an important brain chemical known as dopamine.
When the neurons die or become impaired, they produce
less dopamine, which causes the movement problems of
Parkinson’s.[7]
The disease results from either the insufficient
production of dopamine or/and the loss of dopamine-
producing (“dopaminergic”) brain cells. The reason for this
cell death is poorly understood but involves the build-up
of proteins into so-called Lewy bodies (aggregations of
proteins) within the neurons.[8].
Scientists still do not know
what causes cells that produce dopamine to die.[8-10]
People with Parkinson’s also lose the nerve endings that
produce norepinephrine, the main chemical messenger of the
sympathetic nervous system, which controls many automatic
functions of the body, such as heart rate and blood pressure.[11]
The loss of norepinephrine might help explain some of the non-
movement features of Parkinson’s, such as fatigue, irregular
blood pressure, decreased movement of food through the
digestive tract, and sudden drop in blood pressure when a
person stands up from a sitting or a lying-down position.
Unfortunately, however, notwithstanding the tremendous
progress made in recent years in better understanding the
disease and its possible causes, the fact that the disease was
identified and described over a century ago, and despite
the expenditures of large sums of monies and the conduct
of hundreds of clinical trials, we have not as yet been able
to ferret out the root cause of the disease. Like for many
other diseases, it is believed to involve what I call the
guity triad: Genetic, environmental, and lifestyle (acronym
“GEL”) factors. These three main causal components vary
in importance from person to person and also vary over time
even for the same person. For example, there is an increased
risk of getting Parkinson’s for those with a family member
affected as they are more likely to get the disease themselves
(genetic risk). Likewise, there is an increased risk in people
exposed to certain pesticides (environmental risk). There is a
further increased risk among those who have had prior head
injuries (lifestyle risk). Surprisingly, there appears to be a
reduced risk in tobacco smokers and those who drink coffee
or tea.
WHAT ARE THE SIGNS,
SYMPTOMS, AND STAGES OF THE
DISEASE?
There is a long list of recognized motor and non-motor
symptoms and early and late symptoms. They are extensively
discussed in my book (see in the list of references). I shall not
elaborate further on them here. However, Parkinson’s impacts
people in different ways and not everyone will experience
all the symptoms of the disease; if they do, they will not
necessarily experience them in quite the same order or with
the same intensity. However, symptoms may not always tell
the whole story!
In the early stages, the face may show little or no expression,
the arms may not swing when walking, and the speech
may become soft or slurred. Early symptoms are subtle,
starting gradually, sometimes on one side of the body with
a barely noticeable tremor in just one hand, later on, both
sides. These symptoms generally develop slowly over the
years, the progression being often a bit different from one
person to another due to the diversity of the disease. As the
symptoms become more pronounced, patients may have
trouble walking, talking, or completing other simple tasks.
They may also have problems such as depression and other
emotional changes; sleep disruptions; trouble chewing,
swallowing, or speaking; urinary problems or constipation;
and skin problems. Progression tends to be slow and variable
and the symptoms may begin to interfere with daily activities.
However, these symptoms appear in other diseases as well so
that not everyone with one or more of these symptoms has
the disease. In some people, the disease evolves more quickly
than in others and it is not possible to predict what course the
disease will take.
As neurons in parts of the brain become impaired or die,
people may experience four primary symptoms: (1) Tremor,
or trembling in the hands, arms, legs, jaw, and face;
(2) rigidity, or stiffness of the limbs or trunk of the body;
(3) bradykinesia, or slowness of movement; and (4) gait and
postural instability, or impaired balance and coordination.
This condition may be remembered by the acronym “TRBG.”
There are typical patterns of progression that have been
defined in 5 stages. Various rating scales may be used not only
by the clinician but also by the patient to help understand and
gauge the progression of the disease over the years. Like for
other neurodegenerative diseases, particularly Alzheimer’s
disease, they focus either on functional or/and cognitive
abilities.[12]
They include the original and the “modified
Hoehn and Yahr rating scale,” the “Unified PD rating scale,”
the “Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living scale,”
the “Movement Disorders Society-Unified PD rating scale,”
and others for specific symptoms.[13,14]
These several scales
3. Fymat: Parkinson’s: The disease and what can be done about it
Clinical Research in Neurology • Vol 3 • Issue 2 • 2020 3
are used to describe how individuals are faring and help
assess treatment response.
ASIDE FROM THE AGE OF
OCCURRENCE, HOW DO EARLY-
ONSET AND LATE-ONSET DIFFER?
Young-onset Parkinson’s occurs in people younger than 50
years of age. It affects about 2%-10% of the one million
Parkinson’s people in the United States. The younger the
patient is, the more likely the disease is genetic. Motor
and non-motor symptoms for young- and late-onset
Parkinson’s are similar except for certain differences. Young-
onset individuals have a more frequent family history of
Parkinson’s and a longer survival (due to their younger age).
They also may experience slower progression of symptoms,
more side effects from dopaminergic medications, and more
frequent dystonias (cramping and abnormal postures such as
arching of the foot). Thankfully, younger brains have a higher
neuroplasticity potential, which allows them to handle and
respond to disease and therapy differently. Socially, people
who are affected by Parkinson’s at a younger age experience
the disease differently – they may be at a different stage of
their career and often have less time to engage in their care.
They may also have children or are planning to have children
and have questions regarding passing on Parkinson’s genes.
In late-onset, the symptoms generally come in slowly over
time. Early in the disease, the most obvious symptoms are
shaking, rigidity, slowness of movement, and difficulty
walking. Thinking and behavioral problems may also
occur. In the advanced stages, dementia (a general mental
deterioration due to organic or psychological factors)
becomes common. Depression and anxiety are also common,
occurring in more than a third of late-onset individuals. Other
symptoms include sensory, sleep, and emotional problems.
IS PD THE SAME AS PD
DEMENTIA?
PD is a risk factor (a precursor) for the later-occurring PD
dementia; it speeds up the decline in cognition leading
to dementia. Up to 78% of people with Parkinson’s have
dementia. To be clear, not all Parkinson’s individuals will
necessarily develop dementia.[8]
HOW IS PD DIFFERENT FROM
DEMENTIA WITH LEWY BODIES?
PD dementia is but one component of what is known as
Lewy body dementias, which are characterized by abnormal
deposits of Lewy bodies (alpha-synuclein protein) in the
brain, which were discovered by Frederic Lewy in 1912.
The other component is dementia with Lewy bodies. (Note
the important distinction between Lewy body dementias and
dementia with Lewy bodies). A “diffuse” Lewy body disease
was also described by Kenji Kosaka more than half a century
later, in 1976.[8]
PD dementia starts as a movement disorder but progresses
to include dementia and changes in mood and behavior. Its
signs, symptoms, and cognitive profile are similar to those of
dementia with Lewy bodies. After dementia has taken place,
PD dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies are clinically
similar. There are a few distinctions, however. Thus,
delusions in PD dementia are less common than in dementia
with Lewy bodies. Furthermore, persons with PD dementia
are typically less caught up in their visual hallucinations than
those with dementia with Lewy bodies. Further, there is a
higher incidence of tremor at rest in the former than in the
latter individuals, and signs of Parkinsonism are likewise less
symmetrical.
In general, accepted diagnostic criteria are the same for
the two types of dementia, except that PD dementia is
distinguished from dementia with Lewy bodies by the
time frame in which dementia symptoms appear relative to
Parkinsonian symptoms. Thus, dementia with Lewy bodies
is diagnosed when cognitive symptoms begin before or at the
same time as Parkinsonism. On the other hand, PD dementia
is the diagnosis when PD is well established before dementia
occurs, that is, the onset of dementia is more than a year after
the onset of Parkinsonian symptoms.
WHAT HAPPENS TO THE BRAIN IN
PD?
In a healthy human brain, the neurons are specialized cells
that process and transmit information through electrical and
chemical signals. They send messages between different parts
of the brain and from the brain to the muscles and organs of
the body. Parkinson’s disrupts this communication among
neurons, resulting in loss of function and cell death. It also
disrupts the function and survival of neurons as well as their
several key biological processes. When the communication
between neurons breaks down, metabolism is impaired, and
the ability of neurons to maintain and repair themselves,
remodel their synaptic connections or regenerate new
neurons (which are all important processes for locomotion,
learning, memory, and possibly brain repair) also deteriorate.
These changes may have started perhaps decades earlier
or more, beginning gradually and getting worse over time.
As the disease progresses, motor symptoms develop in
the substantia nigra region of the brain and worsen as the
condition progresses over time, more quickly in some persons
than in others. During the disease, additional non-motor
symptoms progressively manifest themselves. However,
4. Fymat: Parkinson’s: The disease and what can be done about it
4 Clinical Research in Neurology • Vol 3 • Issue 2 • 2020
these symptoms are not necessarily indicative of Parkinson’s
as they may also appear in other diseases as well.
Modern imaging technologies (particularly DaTscan with
Iodine-123 Ioflupane) show the Parkinson-diseased brain to
be a profound modification of a healthy brain with shrinkage
and even near-disappearance of the substantia nigra. The
deterioration from a normal brain is striking and may be used
to gauge the degree of severity of Parkinson’s.[10]
WHAT IS PARKINSONISM?
Medical conditions other than Parkinson’s may have one or
more of the signs and symptoms mimicking Parkinson’s.
“Parkinsonism” is a general term used to describe them. PD
is the most common form of Parkinsonism. It is sometimes
called “idiopathic Parkinsonism,” meaning Parkinsonism
with no identifiable cause.[15,16]
Parkinsonism is a clinical syndrome characterized by
tremor, rigidity (stiffness), bradykinesia (slowness of
movement), and gait and postural instability (imbalance) –
again the acronym TRBG. It is found in idiopathic PD due
to nigrostriatal degeneration, after which it was named,
dementia with Lewy bodies, and many other conditions.
“Parkinsonism” is a general term used to describe them all.
Several neurodegenerative disorders may also present with
Parkinsonism; they are sometimes referred to as “atypical
Parkinsonism” or “Parkinson + plus syndromes,” that is,
Parkinsonism plus some other distinguishing features. They
include multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear
palsy, corticobasal degeneration syndrome, dementia with
Lewy bodies, and synucleinopathy.Additional Parkinsonisms
are: Drug-induced Parkinsonism, vascular Parkinsonism,
psychogenicParkinsonism,essentialtremor,post-encephalitic
Parkinsonism, toxin-induced Parkinsonism, and Parkinson-
dementia complex of Guam. Furthermore, there are several
instances where Parkinsonism results from neurological
disorders, including arteriosclerotic Parkinsonism, post-
traumatic Parkinsonism, and normal pressure hydrocephalus.
Parkinsonian symptoms further appear in individuals with
other distinct neurological disorders such as Wilson’s disease,
Huntington’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, spinocerebellar
ataxia, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. In addition, there
are three important conditions related to Parkinson’s,
specifically melanoma, neurogenic orthostatic hypotension,
and pseudobulbar affect. Each of these disorders has specific
features that help to distinguish it from Parkinson’s. All these
various types of Parkinsonism are discussed and categorized
in my book.
The clinical diagnosis of Parkinsonism is often
straightforward, which obviates additional tests in many
cases. However, for incomplete syndromes, or overlap
between multiple concurrent conditions, particularly early
on, an improvement in diagnostic accuracy may be possible
using the DaTscan visualization modality I mentioned earlier.
However, I must emphasize that DaTscan was not designed
to distinguish between these different conditions.
IS PARKINSON’S A GENETIC
DISEASE?
A large international study suggested that the more variants
a person has, the greater the risk, up to 3 times higher, for
developing the disorder in some cases. The researchers
confirmed that 24 variants represent genetic risk factors
for Parkinson’s, including six variants that had not been
previously identified. Some of the newly identified genetic
risk factors are thought to be involved with Gaucher’s
disease, regulating inflammation and the nerve cell chemical
messenger dopamine as well as alpha-synuclein – a protein
that has been shown to accumulate in the brains of Parkinson’s
individuals. Notwithstanding the above extensive and
interesting results, further research is needed to determine the
roles of the variants identified.[17,18]
Of individuals having Parkinson’s, around 15% have a first-
degree relative who has the disease and 5–10% are known to
have forms of the disease that occur because of a mutation
in one of several specific genes. However, harboring one
of these gene mutations may not necessarily lead to the
disease. Susceptibility factors put the individual at an
increased risk, often in combination with other risk factors,
which also affect the age of onset, severity, and progression.
Even when someone has a gene mutation associated with
Parkinson’s, the likelihood of developing the disease is
low. The reason is that whereas, on the one hand, certain
genes cause Parkinson’s, on the other hand, other genes
may protect some people from developing it. Right now, we
believe that inherited genetics, environmental influences,
and, to a much lesser extent, lifestyle choices (the perennial
triad) collectively determine if someone will develop the
disease.
WHAT IF I CARRY THE GENE?
Parkinson’s is rarely hereditary. Thus, if a person tests
positive for a certain associated gene mutation their risk may
increase, but they may still never develop the disease. Again,
we are speaking of risk (not causal) factors. It is possible
for someone who tests positive for a Parkinson’s mutation
to inherit other genes, be exposed to environmental factors
or have lifestyle choices that do not lead to developing
Parkinson’s. Genetic research has made great strides to
help scientists better understand the biology of Parkinson’s
and guide the development of palliative treatments. Soon,
knowing a person’s genetic background may help predict the
most effective treatments.
5. Fymat: Parkinson’s: The disease and what can be done about it
Clinical Research in Neurology • Vol 3 • Issue 2 • 2020 5
Genetic tests are not generally available, nor are they
recommended for most people with Parkinson’s because
mutations in these genes occur so rarely. Furthermore, there
is no difference in the treatment provided whether the disease
has or does not have a known genetic cause. Nonetheless,
there are ongoing clinical trials testing therapies to treat
Parkinson’s people who carry certain gene mutations. It
can be important to know which gene mutation you carry.
I suggest, therefore, that concerned individuals consult with
their doctor when considering a genetic test to determine if
they are eligible to participate in gene-based clinical trials.
One study, the “Parkinson’s Foundation Genetics Initiative,”
is the first national Parkinson’s study to offer free genetic
testing plus counseling for Parkinson’s-related genes through
medical professionals. It is hoped that this program will
uncover more details about how genetic factors play a role
in Parkinson’s, helping us better understand this complex
disease.
WHAT ARE THE POSTULATED
THEORIES OF PARKINSON’S?
As I indicated earlier, for most people with Parkinson’s, the
disease is caused by a combination of underlying genetic
predisposition, environmental exposures, and, to a much
lesser extent, lifestyle choices. Theoretically, genes may
play a larger role in young-onset rather than late-onset, while
environmental factors may play more of a role in sporadic
Parkinson’s.[19]
However, to date, researchers have found this
hard to prove, as we are still improving our understanding of
the biological mechanisms of the disease. Recently, scientists
have discovered genes that can cause or increase the risk of
developing Parkinson’s at a younger age. Nonetheless, the
root cause remains unknown as we do not yet fully understand
the deep neurobiology of the disease. However, the disease
mechanisms which express it are somewhat understood
from the pathophysiology of the disease, that is, the death
of dopaminergic neurons as a result of changes in biological
activity in the brain that result in the near disappearance of
the substantia nigra.
There are several proposed mechanisms for neuronal death,
not all of which being well understood. The five major
mechanisms (which can best be remembered by the acronym
PAMNB) are: Protein aggregation in Lewy bodies (this is
the bundling called “oligomerization” of the alpha-synuclein
protein forming Lewy bodies in neurons); disruption of
autophagy (this is a mechanism by which inner components
of the cell are broken down and recycled for use, helping to
clear aggregated proteins and regulating cellular function);
changes in cell metabolism or mitochondrial function (or
“mitophagy” wherein mitochondrial function is disrupted,
inhibiting energy production and resulting in cell death);
neuroinflammation (it is better understood for microglia are
recognized as the innate immune cell of the central nervous
system); and breakdown of the blood-brain barrier (here,
protein aggregates or cytokines from neuroinflammation
may interfere with cell receptors and alter their function; also
known as vascular leakiness, it can eventually cause neurons
to alter their function and shift toward apoptotic behavior or
cell death).
Exposure to certain toxins has caused Parkinsonian symptoms
in rare circumstances (such as exposure to MPTP, an illicit
drug, or in miners exposed to the metal manganese). Other
still-unidentified environmental factors may also cause
Parkinson’s in genetically susceptible individuals. Main
environmentally-caused Parkinsonisms are postencephalitic
Parkinsonism; drug-induced Parkinsonism; toxin-induced
Parkinsonism; and Parkinsonism-dementia complex of Guam.
HOW DOES PARKINSON’S
PROGRESS?
The current theory is a part of the so-called Braak’s
hypothesis wherein the earliest signs of the disease occur in
the enteric nervous system, the medulla, and the olfactory
bulb. They progress to the substantia nigra and cortex over
time. This theory is increasingly borne out by evidence
that non-motor symptoms, such as a loss of sense of smell
(hyposomia), sleep disorders, and constipation, may precede
the motor features of the disease by several years. For this
reason, researchers are increasingly focused on these non-
motor symptoms for early detection and to look for ways to
stop its progression.
WHAT ARE THE CURRENT
APPROACHES TO DIAGNOSING
PARKINSON’S?
Making an accurate diagnosis of Parkinson’s, particularly
in its early stages, is difficult, but a skilled practitioner can
come to a reasoned conclusion.[20]
It is first made by an
internist or family physician. Many people seek an additional
opinion from a neurologist with experience and specific
training in the assessment and treatment of Parkinson’s.
Such a specialist who has had extra training (usually a 1-
or 2-year fellowship) in Parkinson’s and other movement
disorders is referred to as a movement disorders specialist.[21]
I recommend that a person with symptoms resembling those
of Parkinson’s consider making an appointment with such a
specialist. Brain scans or laboratory tests can be helpful to
rule out other disorders. However, there is no “one way” to
diagnose the disease!
Many disorders can cause symptoms similar to those of
Parkinson’s. People with Parkinson’s-like symptoms that result
6. Fymat: Parkinson’s: The disease and what can be done about it
6 Clinical Research in Neurology • Vol 3 • Issue 2 • 2020
from other causes are sometimes said to have Parkinsonism, as
I discussed at length earlier. While these disorders initially may
be misdiagnosed as Parkinson’s, certain medical tests, as well
as responses to drug treatments, may help to distinguish them
from Parkinson’s. Since many other diseases have similar
features but require different treatments, it is important to
make an exact diagnosis as soon as possible. Unfortunately,
there are currently no blood or laboratory tests to diagnose
non-genetic cases. Diagnosis is, therefore, based on a person’s
medical history and a neurological examination. Improvement
after initiating medication is another important hallmark of the
diagnosis.
It is important to remember that two of the four main
symptoms (tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, gait, and postural
instability – my earlier mnemonic TRBG) must be present
over a while for a neurologist to consider a Parkinson’s
diagnosis. Other possible causes of these symptoms need
to be ruled out. Finally, three or more of the following
supportive features are required during onset or evolution:
unilateral onset, tremor at rest, progression in time,
asymmetry of motor symptoms, response to Levodopa for
at least 5 years, clinical course of at least 10 years, and
appearance of dyskinesia induced by the intake of excessive
Levodopa.
CAN PARKINSON’S BE PREDICTED
AND PREVENTED?
In rare cases, where people have an inherited form of
Parkinson’s, they can be tested for known gene mutations.
However, this genetic testing can have far-reaching
implications and people should carefully consider whether
they want to know the results of such tests. In most cases,
however, there is no way to predict or prevent sporadic
Parkinson’s. Researchers are still looking for a biomarker – a
biological abnormality that all people with the disease might
share – that could be detected by screening techniques or by
a simple chemical test given to people who do not yet have
any Parkinsonian symptoms. This could help doctors identify
people at risk of the disease. It might also allow them to find
treatments that will stop the disease process in the early stages.
Studies have demonstrated that synuclein builds up in nerve
cells years before symptoms occur. Loss of a sense of smell,
constipation, restless legs, and rapid-eye-movement sleep
disorder[22]
are potentially caused by these early changes. One
important area of research in this domain involves imaging
techniques, such as special magnetic resonance or nuclear
imaging techniques.
As for prevention, exercise in middle age may reduce
the risk of Parkinson’s later in life. Caffeine also appears
protective with a greater decrease in risk occurring with a
larger intake of caffeinated beverages such as coffee. People
who smoke cigarettes or use smokeless tobacco are less
likely than non-smokers to develop the disease, and the more
they have used tobacco, the less likely they are to develop
Parkinson’s disease PD. It is not known what underlies this
effect. Antioxidants such as vitamins C and E have been
proposed to protect against the disease, but the results of
studies have been contradictory and no positive effect has
been proven. The results regarding fat and fatty acids have
been contradictory, with various studies reporting protective
effects, risk-increasing effects, or no effects. There have been
preliminary indications that the use of anti-inflammatory
drugs and calcium channel blockers may be protective.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, apart from aspirin,
have been associated with a reduction in incidence in the
development of Parkinson’s (at least 15% higher in long-term
and regular users). Unfortunately, lifestyle factors and many
medications seem to offer extremely little, if any, potential
benefit in the prevention of Parkinson’s.
IF I HAVE PARKINSON’S, WHAT
WOULD BE MY PROGNOSIS?
As stated earlier, Parkinson’s is both chronic (meaning it
persists over a long period of time) and invariably progressive
(meaning its symptoms grow worse over time). Although
some people become severely disabled, others experience
only minor motor disruptions. Tremor is the major symptom
for some individuals while, for others, tremor is only a minor
complaint, with other symptoms being more troublesome.
It is currently not possible to predict which symptoms will
affect an individual, and the intensity of the symptoms also
varies from person to person.
Untreated, individuals are expected to lose independent
ambulation after an average of 8 years and be bedridden
after 10 years. However, it is uncommon to find untreated
people nowadays. Medication (Levodopa) has improved the
prognosis of motor symptoms, while at the same time, it is a
new source of disability because of its undesired effects after
years of use. In people taking Levodopa, the progression time
of symptoms to a stage of high dependency from caregivers
may be over 15 years. However, it is hard to predict what
course the disease will take for a given individual. Age is
the best predictor of disease progression. The rate of motor
decline is greater in those with less impairment at the time
of diagnosis, while cognitive impairment is more frequent in
those who are over 70 years of age at the onset of symptoms.
Since current therapies improve motor symptoms, disability at
present is mainly related to non-motor features of the disease.
Nevertheless, the relationship between disease progression
and disability is not linear. Disability is initially related to
motor symptoms. As the disease advances, disability is more
7. Fymat: Parkinson’s: The disease and what can be done about it
Clinical Research in Neurology • Vol 3 • Issue 2 • 2020 7
related to motor symptoms that do not respond adequately
to medication, such as swallowing/speech difficulties and
gait/balance problems; and also to Levodopa-induced
complications, which appear in up to 50% of individuals
after 5 years of Levodopa usage. Finally, after 10 years,
most people with the disease have autonomic disturbances,
sleep problems, mood alterations, and cognitive decline.
All of these symptoms, especially cognitive decline, greatly
increase disability.
The life expectancy of people with Parkinson’s is reduced.
Mortality ratios are around twice those of unaffected people.
Cognitive decline and dementia, old age at onset, a more
advanced disease state and the presence of swallowing
problems are all mortality risk factors. On the other hand, a
disease pattern mainly characterized by tremors, as opposed
to rigidity, predicts an improved survival. Death from
aspiration pneumonia is twice as common in individuals with
Parkinson’s as in the healthy population.
HOW IS PD TREATED?
There is no cure and treatment for each affected person is only
directed at improving the associated symptoms. Treatments
consist of medication and eventually surgical therapy. There
are many medications available, although none yet that stop,
reverse, or arrest the progress of the disease. It is common for
people with Parkinson’s to take a variety of these medications
– all at different doses and at different times of day – to
manage symptoms. While keeping track of medications can
be a challenging task, understanding medications and sticking
to a schedule will provide the greatest benefit from the drugs
and avoid unpleasant “off” periods due to missed doses.
Initial treatment is typically with the anti-Parkinson
medication Levodopa (also called L-dopa) with dopamine
agonists being used once Levodopa becomes less effective.
As the disease progresses and neurons continue to be lost,
these medications become less effective while at the same
time, they produce a complication marked by involuntary
writhing movements. Diet and some forms of rehabilitation
have shown some effectiveness in improving symptoms.
Surgery to place microelectrodes for deep brain stimulation
has been used to reduce motor symptoms in severe cases
where drugs are ineffective. In contrast to these two
situations, treatments for non-movement-related symptoms
such as sleep disturbances and emotional problems are less
effective. Other treatments include lifestyle modifications,
such as getting more rest and exercise.
HOW IS THE DISEASE MANAGED?
The main families of drugs useful for treating motor
symptoms are Levodopa, always combined with a dopa
decarboxylase inhibitor and sometimes also with a COMT
inhibitor, dopamine agonists, and MAO-B inhibitors. Nerve
cells use Levodopa to make dopamine to replenish the brain’s
dwindling supply. The stage of the disease and the age at
disease onset usually determine which group of medications
is most useful.
Four stages are usually distinguished: (1) In the initial stage,
treatment aims for an optimal trade-off between symptom
control and treatment side-effects. The start of Levodopa
treatment may be postponed by initially using instead other
medications such as MAO-B inhibitors and dopamine
agonists, in the hope of delaying the onset of complications
due to Levodopa use. Nonetheless, Levodopa is still the most
effective treatment for motor symptoms and should not be
delayed in those whose quality of life is impaired by those
symptoms. Levodopa-related dyskinesias correlate more
strongly with the duration and severity of the disease than the
duration of the Levodopa treatment, so delaying this therapy
may not provide much longer dyskinesia-free time than early
use; (2) the second stage is associated with the development of
complications related to Levodopa usage. The aim here is to
reduce symptoms while controlling fluctuations in the effect
of the medication. Sudden withdrawals from medication or
overuse have to be managed. When oral medications are not
enoughtocontrolsymptoms,surgery(deepbrainstimulation),
subcutaneous waking-day apomorphine infusion, and enteral
dopa pumps can be of use; (3) the third stage applies when
symptoms unrelated to dopamine deficiency or Levodopa
treatment may predominate. It presents many challenging
problems requiring a variety of treatments for psychiatric
symptoms, orthostatic hypotension, bladder dysfunction,
etc.; and (4) in the final stages of the disease, palliative care
is provided to improve the quality of life.
WHAT ARE THE CHALLENGES
OF TREATING MOTOR AND
NEUROPSYCHIATRIC SYMPTOMS?
Neurologists can choose from a large number of compounds
to treat the motor symptoms effectively for several years,
if not decades. Furthermore, owing to advances in internal
medicine, anesthesia, and surgery, Parkinson’s patients live
longer but within the optimal therapeutic balance between
motor- and non-motor symptoms with a minimum of adverse
effects.
With advancing age and duration of the disease, gait problems
(which do not respond to dopamimetic therapy) combined
withtheincreasedriskoffallsandfracturesdevelop,including
autonomic dysfunctions such as urinary incontinence and
severe obstipation, sleep impairment, pain syndromes, and
neuropsychiatric symptoms such as depression, impulse
control disorders, punding, hallucinations, overt psychosis
8. Fymat: Parkinson’s: The disease and what can be done about it
8 Clinical Research in Neurology • Vol 3 • Issue 2 • 2020
in part induced by dopamimetic therapy, and cognitive
impairment progressing to dementia. Still further, the extent
of comorbidity increases with orthopedic syndromes, diabetes
mellitus, metabolic syndrome, heart failure, and stroke.
Thus, the weight of therapeutic need has shifted from “just”
making or keeping the patient mobile to the challenge of
fine-tuning a therapeutic combination of drugs for (1) the
treatment of motor and non-motor symptoms, (2) motor
and non-motor complications and, in accordance with
other medical treatments and care, and (3) treatment that is
acceptable to the patient and the caring partner(s).
WHAT IS THE PHARMACOLOGICAL
THERAPY FOR MOTOR
SYMPTOMS?
Medications for Parkinson’s fall under six categories, the
cornerstone remaining Levodopa: (1) Drugs that increase
brain levels of dopamine (Levodopa, Carbidopa); (2) drugs
that mimic dopamine (dopamine agonists: Apomorphine,
pramipexole, ropinirole, rotigotine); (3) drugs that inhibit
dopamine breakdown (MAO-B inhibitors: Rasagiline,
selegiline); (4) other drugs that inhibit dopamine breakdown
(COMT inhibitors: Entacapone, tolcapone); (5) drugs that
decrease the action of acetylcholine (anticholinergics:
Benztropine, ethopropazine, trihexyphenidyl); and (6) drugs
with an unknown mechanism of action (amantadine).
Difficulties may be encountered in the course of the disease
such as more pronounced symptoms before the first dose of
medication in the morning and between doses as the period of
effectiveness after each dose begins to shorten accompanied
by sudden, unpredictable “off periods” where the medications
do not seem to be working (this is the so-called wearing-off
effect).
One approach to alleviating these side effects is to take
Levodopa more often and in smaller amounts. People
with PD should never stop taking Levodopa without their
physician’s input because rapidly withdrawing the drug can
have potentially serious side effects. When recommending
a course of treatment, a doctor will assess how much the
symptoms disrupt the person’s life and then tailor therapy to
the person’s particular condition. Since no two people will
react the same way to a given drug, it may take time and
patience to get the dose just right. Even then, symptoms may
not be completely alleviated.
To delay or ameliorate the motor complications associated
with L-Dopa therapy, several other classes of drugs are
available to be prescribed before the use of, or in combination
with, L-Dopa. The L-Dopa effect can be enhanced
and prolonged in either of the following two ways: (1)
Combination with peripheral inhibitors of degrading enzymes
(benserazide or carbidopa – a standard combination; COMT)
and (2) centrally active inhibitors of the degrading enzyme
MAO-B (rasagiline, selegiline).
AND, HOW ABOUT THE
PHARMACOLOGY FOR NON-
MOTOR SYMPTOMS?
There are numerous pharmacotherapies available for
individual non-motor symptoms though mostly by employing
a given compound approved to treat one or more of those
symptoms. For example, people with Parkinson’s-related
depression may be prescribed antidepressants.
There are certain advanced pharmacological therapeutic
options that currently include: (1) L-Dopa emulsion that
can be applied by an external pump through a percutaneous
tubing into the jejunal cavity to provide a nearly constant
continuous supply of L-Dopa to the blood and thus to the
central nervous system and (2) non-ergot dopamine agonists
(apomorphine, piribedil – that is only registered in Europe,
pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine).
Other drugs include cholinesterase inhibitors (for dementia);
modafinil (for daytime sleepiness); and quetiapine (for
psychosis).
CAN THE DRUG EFFECTIVENESS
BE TRACKED?
Yes, with the use of exosomes.[23]
These nanoscale particles
are produced by all types of cells and circulate in the
bloodstream. Exosomes originating from neurons carry an
information-rich cellular cargo and can cross the blood-
brain barrier. Several previous studies have demonstrated
that it is possible to track key disease-related proteins within
this exosome cargo and that this technique can successfully
differentiate between healthy control samples and those from
patients with Parkinson’s (and also Alzheimer’s). In clinical
trials, exosomes are an additional analytical tool to show
target engagement and to help speed up the validation of
potential new drugs.
WHAT ABOUT SURGERY
TREATMENTS?
Therapy resistance, fluctuations, and dyskinesias may
develop over time. To provide treatment to these chronically
and severely affected patients, surgical approaches have
been developed since the 1950s and 1960s. Treating motor
symptoms with surgery was once a common practice but,
sincethediscoveryofLevodopa,thenumberofoperationshad
9. Fymat: Parkinson’s: The disease and what can be done about it
Clinical Research in Neurology • Vol 3 • Issue 2 • 2020 9
declined. However, studies in the past few decades have led
to great improvements in surgical techniques, so that surgery
is again being used in people with advanced Parkinson’s for
whom drug therapy is no longer sufficient.[24,25]
Surgery for Parkinson’s can be divided into three main groups:
(1) Radiofrequency lesioning (in the 1960s, it was performed
in the subthalamus; newer technologies have since replaced
it); (2) deep, high-frequency brain stimulation (for those who
do not respond well to medications). Deep brain stimulation
increased the therapeutic options for it is effective not only
in very advanced cases but also for patients who have just
started to develop motor complications.[26,27]
It also allows one
to decrease the amount of pharmacotherapy (Levodopa and
related drugs), resulting in fewer motor or neuropsychiatric
adverse effects, or both. It is not generally an option for people
with memory problems, hallucinations, severe depression,
poor health, or a poor response to Levodopa. It has not been
demonstrated to be of benefit for “atypical” Parkinsonian
syndromes such as multiple system atrophy, progressive
supranuclear palsy, or post-traumatic Parkinsonism, which also
do not improve with Parkinson’s medications. Further, as with
any brain surgery, it has potential complications, including
stroke or brain hemorrhage, which are, however, rare. There is
also a risk of infection, which may require antibiotics or even
replacement of parts of the system; and (3) magnetic resonance-
guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of
Parkinson’s, neuropathic pain, and essential tremor.
HOW DOES ONE COPE WITH
BALANCE PROBLEMS?
Although not strictly Parkinson’s problems, balance
problems and disorders are nonetheless important because
they are germane to movement disorders. Balance problems
are among the most common reasons that older adults seek
help from a doctor. They are often caused by disturbances
in the inner ear, vertigo being a common symptom. Having
good balance means being able to control and maintain one’s
body’s position, whether moving or remaining still. Good
balance helps to walk without staggering, get up from a chair
without falling, climb stairs without tripping, and bending
over without falling. Good balance is important to help get
around, stay independent, and carry out daily activities.
People are more likely to have problems with their balance
as they get older. However, age is not the only reason these
problems occur. Some balance disorders are caused by
problems in the inner ear, particularly the vestibular system
also known as the labyrinth. A condition called labyrinthitis
occurs when the labyrinth becomes infected or swollen. It
is typically accompanied by vertigo and imbalance. Upper
respiratory infections, other viral infections, and, less
commonly, bacterial infections can also lead to labyrinthitis.
Some medications can also cause a balance problem. Some
people with a balance disorder may not be able to fully
relieve their dizziness and will need to find ways to cope with
it. A vestibular rehabilitation therapist can help to develop an
individualized treatment plan.
Some diseases of the circulatory system, such as stroke, can
causedizzinessandotherbalanceproblems.Lowbloodpressure
can also cause dizziness. Head injury and many medicines may
also lead to balance problems. Many people with advanced
Parkinson’s suffer from gait (walking) dysfunction, freezing
of gait, and postural instability. These symptoms can cause
falling, resulting in a multitude of injuries, a loss of personal
freedom, caregiver stress, and a reduction in the quality of
life. Medications, such as Levodopa, rarely help with these
specific motor symptoms, while deep brain stimulation results
are limited and unpredictable for these particular symptoms.
The fact is, current Parkinson’s medications, therapies or
surgical procedures do not effectively address this debilitating
unmet need. This lack of options might be changing due to an
intervention called spinal cord stimulation, a device that alters
nerve activity by sending a low-voltage electrical current to
select areas of the spinal cord.
For more information about balance problems and disorders,
falls and prevention, contact the Parkinson’s Foundation; the
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication
Disorders; the Mayo Clinic; and MedlinePlus.gov (National
Library of Medicine); and other organizations.
ARE THERE COMPLEMENTARY
THERAPIES?
While many Parkinson’s patients choose conventional
medications and treatments, complementary and supportive
therapies may provide additional symptom relief. These
include: (1) Therapeutic approach (for speech and swallowing
evaluation and therapy); (2) standard physical, occupational,
and speech therapy techniques (for such problems as gait and
voice disorders, tremors and rigidity, and cognitive decline);
(3) diet and vitamin supplements (at this time, there are no
specific vitamins, minerals, or other nutrients that have any
proven therapeutic value); (4) exercise (to improve mobility and
flexibility, tone and strengthen muscles, improve body strength
and balance, and minimize gait problems); and (5) others
(massage therapy to relieve tension and stress, meditation,
yoga, hypnosis, acupressure, acupuncture, physiotherapy,
dance interventions, and logopedic training of dysphagia).
WHAT ABOUT PALLIATIVE CARE
AND REHABILITATION?
Palliative care is specialized medical care for providing
relief from the symptoms, pain, and stress of illnesses and
10. Fymat: Parkinson’s: The disease and what can be done about it
10 Clinical Research in Neurology • Vol 3 • Issue 2 • 2020
improving the quality of life for both the suffering person and
their family and carers. As Parkinson’s is not yet a curable
disease, all treatments are focused on slowing decline and
improving the quality of life and are therefore palliative in
nature. Palliative care should be sought earlier, rather than
later in the disease course, serving an important role in
addressing goals of care.
Regarding rehabilitation, exercise programs are
recommended.There is some evidence that speech or mobility
problems can improve with rehabilitation, although studies
are scarce and of low quality. Regular physical exercise with
or without physical therapy can be beneficial to maintain and
improve mobility, flexibility, strength, gait speed, and quality
of life.
HOW DOES ONE COPE WITH
PARKINSON’S?
While Parkinson’s usually progresses slowly, eventually,
daily routines may be affected – from socializing with friends
to earning a living and taking care of a home. These changes
can be difficult to accept. Support groups can help people cope
with the disease’s emotional impact. They can also provide
valuable information, advice, and experience to deal with a
wide range of issues, including locating doctors familiar with
the disease and coping with physical limitations.
Individual or family counseling may also help people find
ways to cope. People with Parkinson’s may also benefit
from being proactive and finding out as much as possible
about the disease to alleviate fear of the unknown and to
take a positive role in maintaining their health. Many people
with Parkinson’s continue to work either full- or part-time,
although they may need to adjust their schedule and working
environment to accommodate their symptoms.
For more information about palliative care contact:
CaringInfo; the Center to Advance Palliative Care;
Visiting Nurse Associations of America; and other similar
organizations.
WHAT CAN ONE DO BEYOND
SEEKING STANDARD
TREATMENTS?
Because symptom deterioration is often significantly slower
in those who take a positive and proactive stance toward
their condition than in those who do not, I suggest as many
of the following 12 steps as possible: (1) Become well
informed about the disease: This is one important long-term
strategy. Furthermore, programs that teach families about
the various stages of Parkinson’s and about ways to deal
with difficult behaviors and other caregiving challenges can
help. For more information about Parkinson’s brain changes,
contact: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders
and Stroke; the National Institute on Aging; the Parkinson’s
Foundation; the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s
Research; Eldercare Locator; MedlinePlus.gov; the National
Human Genome Research Institute; and the National Center
for Biotechnology Information; (2) ask questions of your
doctors and be an active advocate for yourself; and (3) begin
treatment early in the disease process to help preserve daily
functioning for some time. An early diagnosis also helps
families plan for the future. They can take care of financial
and legal matters, address potential safety issues, learn about
living arrangements, and develop support networks; (3) look
for new treatments as Parkinson’s research has developed
to a point where scientists are starting to look beyond
treating symptoms and thinking about addressing underlying
disease processes; (4) enroll in ongoing clinical trials that
develop and test several possible interventions, including
drug therapy, cognitive training, and physical activity, and
treatments used for cardiovascular disease and diabetes;
(5) exercise; (6) maintain mental function to help engaging in
mentally-stimulating activities as well as with one or more of
the appropriate medications that have been FDA-approved.
Even though they only treat symptoms of Parkinson’s and
do not change the underlying process, these medications
can help in the young- and late-onset cases. However, they
can be effective for some but not all people and may help
only for a limited time; (6) manage behavior to make people
with Parkinson’s more comfortable and ease things for
caregivers; (7) beware of balance problems and disorders to
help walk without staggering, get up from a chair without
falling, climb stairs without tripping, and bend over without
falling, get around, stay independent, and carry out daily
activities; (8) improve speech and communication; (9) keep
talking; (10) practice good “voice hygiene;” (11) participate
in creative arts therapies (painting, drama, dance, and music)
to help improve the quality of life; and (12) reduce stress, a
must as stress worsens every symptom.
IS SUPPORT FOR FAMILIES AND
CAREGIVERS AVAILABLE?
Caring for a person with Parkinson’s can have high physical,
emotional, and financial costs. The demands of day-to-day
care, changes in family roles, and decisions about placement
in a care facility can be difficult. Several evidence-based
approachesandprogramscanhelp.Researchersarecontinuing
to look for new and better ways to support caregivers.
Good coping skills, a strong support network, and respite
care are other ways that help caregivers handle the stress of
caring for a loved one with Parkinson’s. For example, staying
physically active provides physical and emotional benefits.
11. Fymat: Parkinson’s: The disease and what can be done about it
Clinical Research in Neurology • Vol 3 • Issue 2 • 2020 11
Some caregivers have found that joining a support group is
a critical lifeline. These support groups allow caregivers to
find respite, express concerns, share experiences, get tips,
and receive emotional comfort. Many organizations sponsor
in-person and online support groups, including groups for
people with early-stage Parkinson’s and their families.
WHAT ARE THE ADVOCATING AND
SUPPORTING ORGANIZATIONS?
Nineteen main U.S. organizations support PD patients and
their families: (1) The American Academy of Neurology;
(2) The American PD Association; (3) The Bechmann-
Strauss Dystonia and Parkinson Foundation; (4) Caring.com;
(5) CurePSP(Foundation for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy/
Corticobasal Syndrome and Related Brain Diseases); (6) The
International Parkinson’s and Movement Disorders Society;
(7) The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson Research;
(8) The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and
Stroke; (9) The National Parkinson’s Foundation; (10) The
Parkinson Action Network; (11) The Parkinson Study Group;
(12) The PD Foundation; (13) Partners in Parkinson’s;
(14)TheSocietyofNuclearMedicineandMolecularImaging;
(15) The Davis Phinney Foundation; (16) The National
Parkinson Foundation; (17) The Parkinson Alliance; (18) The
Tremor Action Network; and (19) The (U.S.) Department of
Veterans’Affairs – PD Research.
There are many other supporting organizations across the
world, including, in particular, the European PD Association.
ANY NEW RESEARCH VISTAS IN
THE FIELD?
Yes! Beginning in 1997, the world of PD research began
changing dramatically with contemporaneous advances in
immunotherapy, genetics, neuroprotective treatment, and
nanomedicine.
The immunotherapeutic strategy relies on the critical
assumptions that alpha-synuclein is accessible in the
extracellular space (trans-synaptic spreading), antibodies
against alpha-synuclein reach the brain in sufficient quantity,
and they trap alpha-synuclein aggregates when these are
released (“spread”) into the extracellular synaptic space.
However, one important limitation of active and passive
immunotherapy is the low amount of antibodies that can pass
the blood-brain barrier; this may be overcome by coupling
antibodies to the peptide penetratin.To traverse this barrier, my
book includes a whole chapter in which I propose and discuss
the use of nanobiotechnology methods and procedures.[28-35]
Gene therapy may play an important role in the search for
PD-modifying therapy.[36]
It typically involves the use of a
non-infectious virus (i.e., a viral vector such as the associated
adenovirus) to shuttle genetic material into a part of the brain.
The gene used leads to the production of an enzyme that helps
to manage Parkinson’s symptoms or protect the brain from
further damage. In 2010, there were four clinical trials using
gene therapy. So far, no important adverse effects in these
trials have been reported, although the clinical usefulness of
gene therapy has not yet been established.
Investigations on neuroprotection are at the forefront of
Parkinson’s research: (1) Several molecules have been
proposed as potential treatments. However, none of them
have been conclusively demonstrated to reduce degeneration.
Agents currently under investigation include: Anti-apoptotic
(Omigapil, CEP-1347); antiglutamatergic; MAO inhibitors
(Selegiline, Rasagiline); promitochondrials (coenzyme Q10,
creatine); calcium channel blockers (Isradipine); growth
factors; and vaccines (PD01Ato prime the immune system has
entered clinical trials in humans); (2) neural transplantation
(cell transplants in which dissociated cells are injected into
the substantia nigra in the hope that they will incorporate
themselves into the brain in a way that replaces the dopamine-
producing cells that have been lost.[37]
No long-term benefit
has been shown so far. An additional significant problem was
the excess release of dopamine by the transplanted tissue,
leading to dystonia; (3) stem cell transplants (performed
into the brains of rodents and monkeys, they have been
found to survive and reduce behavioral abnormalities);
(4) spinal cord stimulation;[38]
(5) focused ultrasound;[39,40]
(6) transcranial magnetic stimulation temporarily improves
Levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Its usefulness in Parkinson’s
is an open research topic; and (7) nutrients (caffeine, inosine,
isradipine, and nicotine) have shown some benefits but not so
for vitamins or food additives.
Being able to traverse or bypass the blood-brain barrier while
delivering therapeutic compounds at the right locations in
the right dosage amounts would herald a new approach I
proposed for the treatment of PD. This is what nanomedicine
and nanobiotechnology promise to do. However, while the
technology is now well known, its application to Parkinson’s
has not yet been undertaken.
REFERENCES
1. Hawkes CH, Del Tredici K, Braak H. Parkinson’s disease:
A dual-hit hypothesis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol
2007;33:599-614.
2. Kalia LV, Lang AE. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet
2015;386:896-912.
3. Parkinson J. An Essay on Shaking Palsy. London: Sherwood
Neely and Jones; 1817.
4. Oertel W, Schulz JB. Current and experimental treatments of
Parkinson’s disease: A guide for neuroscientists. J Neurochem
2016;139:325-37.
5. Samii A, Nutt JG, Ransom BR. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet
12. Fymat: Parkinson’s: The disease and what can be done about it
12 Clinical Research in Neurology • Vol 3 • Issue 2 • 2020
2004;363:1183-93.
6. Schapira AH. Etiology and pathogenesis of Parkinson’s
disease. Neurol Clin 2009;27:583-603.
7. Aminoff MJ, Greenberg DA, Simon RP. Movement disorders.
In: Clinical Neurology. 6th
ed., Ch. 7. Lange: McGraw-Hill
Medical; 2005. p. 241-5.
8. Fymat AL. Parkin..ss..oo..nn: Elucidating the Disease... and
What You Can do About it. Canada: Tellwell Talent Publishers;
2020b. p. 258.
9. Fymat AL. On the pathogenic hypothesis of neurodegenerative
diseases. J Clin Res Neurol 2019c;2:1-7.
10. Fymat AL. Neuroradiology and its role in neurodegenerative
diseases. J Radiol Imaging Sci 2020a;1:1-14.
11. Tensey MG, Goldberg MS. Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s
disease: Its role in neuronal death and implications for
therapeutic intervention. Neurobiol Dis 2010;37:510-8.
12. Caballol N, Martí MJ, Tolosa E. Cognitive dysfunction and
dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2007;22:S358-66.
13. Goetz CG, Poewe W, Rascol O, Sampaio C, Stebbins GT,
Counsell C, et al. Movement disorder society task force
report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: Status and
recommendations. The movement disorder society task
force on rating scales for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord
2004;19:1020-8.
14. Hoehn M, Yahr M. Parkinsonism: Onset, progression, and
mortality. Neurology 1967;17:427.
15. Shuaib UA, Rajput AH, Robinson CA, Rajput A. Neuroleptic-
induced Parkinsonism: Clinicopathological study. Mov Disord
2016;31:360-5.
16. Tobottom BJ, Weiner WJ, Shulman LM. Parkinsonism. In:
Lisak RP, Truong DD, Carroll W, Bhidayasiri R, editors.
International Neurology: A Clinical Approach. Ch. 42. United
States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2009. p. 152-8.
17. Hernandez DG, Reed X, SingletonAB. Genetics in Parkinson’s
disease: Mendelian versus non-mendelian inheritance. J
Neurochem 2016;139:59-74.
18. Shulman JM, De Jager PL, Feany MB. Parkinson’s disease:
Genetics and pathogenesis. Ann Rev Pathol 2011;6:193-222.
19. NandipatiS,LitvanI.EnvironmentalexposuresandParkinson’s
disease. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016;13:881.
20. Jankovic J. Parkinson’s disease: Clinical features and diagnosis.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:36876.
21. Seppi K, Weintraub D, Coelho M, Perez-Lloret S, Fox SH,
Katzenschlager R, et al. The movement disorder society
evidence-based medicine review update: Treatments for the
non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord
2011;26:S42-80.
22. St Louis EK, Boeve AR, Boeve BF. REM sleep behavior
disorder in Parkinson’s disease and other synucleinopathies.
Mov Disord 2017;32:645-58.
23. Athauda D, Gulyani S, Karnati HK, Li Y, Tweedie D,
Mustapic M, et al. Utility of neuronal-derived exosomes to
examine molecular mechanisms that affect motor functions in
patients with Parkinson’s disease: A secondary analysis of the
exenatide-PD trial. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:420-9.
24. Bertrand C, Martinez S, Hardy J, Molina-Negro P, Velasco F.
Stereotactic surgery for Parkinsonism. Prog Neurol Surg
1973;5:79-112.
25. Schwab RS, England AC. Projection Techniques for
Evaluating Surgery in Parkinson’s Disease. Edinburgh: 1968
3rd
Symposium on Parkinson’s Disease, Royal College of
Surgeons in Edinburgh. E. S. Livingstone Ltd.; 1969.
26. Bronstein M, Tagliati M, Alterman RL, Lozano AM,
Volkmann J, Stefani A, et al. Deep brain stimulation for
Parkinson’s disease: An expert consensus and review of key
issues. Arch Neurol 2011;68:165.
27. Coffey RJ. Deep brain stimulation devices: A brief technical
history and review. Artif Organs 2009;33:208-20.
28. Fymat AL. Nanoneurology: Drug delivery across the brain-
protective barriers. J Nanomed Res 2017a;5:1-4.
29. Fymat AL. Synthetic immunotherapy with chimeric antigen
receptors. J Cancer Prev Curr Res 2017b;7:1-3.
30. Fymat AL. Therapeutics delivery behind, through and beyond
the blood-brain barrier. Open Access J Surg 2017c;5:1-9.
31. Fymat AL. Immunotherapy of brain cancers and neurological
disorders. J Cancer Prev Curr Res 2017d;8:1-7.
32. Fymat AL. Parkinson’s disease and other movement disorders:
A review. J Curr Opin Neurol Sci 2017j;2:316-43.
33. Fymat AL. Blood-brain barrier permeability and neurological
diseases. J Curr Opin Neurol Sci 2018a;2:411-4.
34. Fymat AL. Regulating the brain’s autoimmune system: The
end of all neurological disorders? J Curr Opin Neurol Sci
2018c;2:475-9.
35. Fymat AL. Harnessing the immune system to treat cancers and
neurodegenerative diseases. J Clin Res Neurol 2018f;1:1-14.
36. Feng LR, Maguire-Zeiss KA. Gene therapy in Parkinson’s
disease: Rationale and current status. CNS Drugs
2010;24:177-92.
37. Redmond DE. Cellular replacement therapy for Parkinson’s
disease-where are we today? Neuroscientist 2002;8:457-88.
38. Samotus O, Parrent A, Jog M. Spinal cord stimulation therapy
for gait dysfunction in advanced Parkinson’s disease patients.
Mov Disord 2018;33:783-92.
39. Fishman PS, Frenkel V. Treatment of movement disorders with
focused ultrasound. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis 2017;9.
40. Jeanmonod D, Werner B, Morel A, Michels L, Zadicario E,
Schiff G, et al. Transcranial magnetic resonance imaging-
guided focused-ultrasound: Noninvasive central lateral
thalamotomy for chronic neuropathic pain. Neurosurg Focus
2012;32:E1.
How to cite this article: Fymat AL. Parkinson’s: What
Do We Know About the Disease and What Can Be Done
About It? Clin Res Neurol 2020;3(2):1-12.