This document discusses assessing quality and bias in studies. It defines quality as having two aspects: methodological quality, which relates to the design and conduct of the research, and reporting quality, which is how well the study is written to allow replication. Assessing bias focuses on potential systematic errors that could overestimate or underestimate effects. Several tools are used to evaluate risk of bias, consistency, precision, and publication bias. Guidelines also exist for transparent reporting in different study designs to improve quality. While quality assessment tools are available, they are not universally accepted and may lack external validation. Bias is a systematic error that should be evaluated in each study through domains like selection bias, information bias, and confounding.
I. INTRODUCTION
DEFINITION
HISTORY
NEED TO STUDY BIOSTATISTICS
SAMPLING
METHODS OF PRESENTATION OF DATA
METHODS OF SUMMARIZING THE DATA
: Measures of Central Tendency
: Mean
: Median
: Mode
: Measures of Dispersion
: range
: Mean deviation
: Standard deviation
: Coefficient of variation
CORRELATION & REGRESSION
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION AND NORMAL CURVE.
METHODS OF ANALYZING THE DATA
SUMMARY & CONCLUSION
I. INTRODUCTION
DEFINITION
HISTORY
NEED TO STUDY BIOSTATISTICS
SAMPLING
METHODS OF PRESENTATION OF DATA
METHODS OF SUMMARIZING THE DATA
: Measures of Central Tendency
: Mean
: Median
: Mode
: Measures of Dispersion
: range
: Mean deviation
: Standard deviation
: Coefficient of variation
CORRELATION & REGRESSION
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION AND NORMAL CURVE.
METHODS OF ANALYZING THE DATA
SUMMARY & CONCLUSION
Randomization is the process by which allocation of subjects to treatment groups is done by chance, without the ability to predict who is in what group. It is done in clinical trials. This presentation describes the methods of randmization used in clinical trials.
Systematic (non-random) error that results in an incorrect estimate of the association between exposure and risk of disease.
Can occur in all stages of a study
Not affected by study sample size
Difficult to adjust for afterwards, but can be reduced by adequate study design.
•Can never be totally avoided, but we must be aware of it and interpret our results accordingly
WHO defines Quality of Life as an individual's perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns.
Systematic review and meta analysis is considered as the highest body of evidence in research evidence hierarchy. Often misunderstood or skipped over, this powerful tool can broaden our understanding on a specific topic and form basis of practicing evidence based medicine for us.
I presented systematic review and meta analysis as part of my PG seminar and got a good feedback. Now I wanted to share the presentation for a broader audience.
Any kind of constructive feedback is welcome.
Dr. Anik Chakraborty
JR3, Dept. Of Community Medicine
Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak
Randomization is the process by which allocation of subjects to treatment groups is done by chance, without the ability to predict who is in what group. It is done in clinical trials. This presentation describes the methods of randmization used in clinical trials.
Systematic (non-random) error that results in an incorrect estimate of the association between exposure and risk of disease.
Can occur in all stages of a study
Not affected by study sample size
Difficult to adjust for afterwards, but can be reduced by adequate study design.
•Can never be totally avoided, but we must be aware of it and interpret our results accordingly
WHO defines Quality of Life as an individual's perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns.
Systematic review and meta analysis is considered as the highest body of evidence in research evidence hierarchy. Often misunderstood or skipped over, this powerful tool can broaden our understanding on a specific topic and form basis of practicing evidence based medicine for us.
I presented systematic review and meta analysis as part of my PG seminar and got a good feedback. Now I wanted to share the presentation for a broader audience.
Any kind of constructive feedback is welcome.
Dr. Anik Chakraborty
JR3, Dept. Of Community Medicine
Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak
Systematic literature review | Meta analysis | Retrospective versusPubrica
Systematic review for prospective studies is a meticulous and essential process ensuring research findings’ reliability and validity. The key to success lies in adhering to a well-structured methodology that includes defining the research question, developing a comprehensive search strategy, screening studies based on pre-defined criteria, and critically appraising the selected articles.
Read more @ https://pubrica.com/academy/manuscript-editing/conduct-a-systematic-review-for-prospective-studies/
Efficacy of Information interventions in reducing transfer anxiety from a cri...Ambika Rai
Efficacy of Information interventions in reducing transfer anxiety from a critical care setting to a general ward: A systematic review and a meta-analysis
This workshop is meant to be an introduction to the systematic review process. Further information about systematic reviews was available through a research guide. http://libguides.ucalgary.ca/content.php?pid=593664
Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Legal ResearchPreeti Sikder
Lesson Objective: After completing this lesson students will be:
a) informed about the significance of validity threats in qualitative research
b) Learn about ways to ensure validity while conducting legal research
Retrospective versus | Meta analysis | Systematic literature reviewPubrica
Systematic review for prospective studies is a meticulous and essential process ensuring research findings’ reliability and validity. The key to success lies in adhering to a well-structured methodology that includes defining the research question, developing a comprehensive search strategy, screening studies based on pre-defined criteria, and critically appraising the selected articles.
https://pubrica.com/academy/manuscript-editing/conduct-a-systematic-review-for-prospective-studies/
How to write Research methodology Thesis, How to write research proposal, what is research methodology, how to write research paper, research tools, Dr.Narendranath Guria
Small ruminant keepers’ knowledge, attitudes and practices towards peste des ...ILRI
Presentation by Guy Ilboudo, Abel Sènabgè Biguezoton, Cheick Abou Kounta Sidibé, Modou Moustapha Lo, Zoë Campbell and Michel Dione at the 6th Peste des Petits Ruminants Global Research and Expertise Networks (PPR-GREN) annual meeting, Bengaluru, India, 28–30 November 2023.
Small ruminant keepers’ knowledge, attitudes and practices towards peste des ...ILRI
Poster by Guy Ilboudo, Abel Sènabgè Biguezoton, Cheick Abou Kounta Sidibé, Modou Moustapha Lo, Zoë Campbell and Michel Dione presented at the 6th Peste des Petits Ruminants Global Research and Expertise Networks (PPR-GREN) annual meeting, Bengaluru, India, 29 November 2023.
A training, certification and marketing scheme for informal dairy vendors in ...ILRI
Presentation by Silvia Alonso, Jef L. Leroy, Emmanuel Muunda, Moira Donahue Angel, Emily Kilonzi, Giordano Palloni, Gideon Kiarie, Paula Dominguez-Salas and Delia Grace at the Micronutrient Forum 6th Global Conference, The Hague, Netherlands, 16 October 2023.
Milk safety and child nutrition impacts of the MoreMilk training, certificati...ILRI
Poster by Silvia Alonso, Emmanuel Muunda, Moira Donahue Angel, Emily Kilonzi, Giordano Palloni, Gideon Kiarie, Paula Dominguez-Salas, Delia Grace and Jef L. Leroy presented at the Micronutrient Forum 6th Global Conference, The Hague, Netherlands, 16 October 2023.
Food safety research in low- and middle-income countriesILRI
Presentation by Hung Nguyen-Viet at the first technical meeting to launch the Food Safety Working Group under the One Health Partnership framework, Hanoi, Vietnam, 28 September 2023
Presentation by Hung Nguyen-Viet at the first technical meeting to launch the Food Safety Working Group under the One Health Partnership framework, Hanoi, Vietnam, 28 September 2023
Reservoirs of pathogenic Leptospira species in UgandaILRI
Presentation by Lordrick Alinaitwe, Martin Wainaina, Salome Dürr, Clovice Kankya, Velma Kivali, James Bugeza, Martin Richter, Kristina Roesel, Annie Cook and Anne Mayer-Scholl at the University of Bern Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences Symposium, Bern, Switzerland, 29 June 2023.
Assessing meat microbiological safety and associated handling practices in bu...ILRI
Presentation by Patricia Koech, Winnie Ogutu, Linnet Ochieng, Delia Grace, George Gitao, Lily Bebora, Max Korir, Florence Mutua and Arshnee Moodley at the 8th All Africa Conference on Animal Agriculture, Gaborone, Botswana, 26–29 September 2023.
Ecological factors associated with abundance and distribution of mosquito vec...ILRI
Poster by Max Korir, Joel Lutomiah and Bernard Bett presented the 8th All Africa Conference on Animal Agriculture, Gaborone, Botswana, 26–29 September 2023.
Practices and drivers of antibiotic use in Kenyan smallholder dairy farmsILRI
Poster by Lydiah Kisoo, Dishon M. Muloi, Walter Oguta, Daisy Ronoh, Lynn Kirwa, James Akoko, Eric Fèvre, Arshnee Moodley and Lillian Wambua presented at Tropentag 2023, Berlin, Germany, 20–22 September 2023.
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderlandRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
A brief information about the SCOP protein database used in bioinformatics.
The Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database is a comprehensive and authoritative resource for the structural and evolutionary relationships of proteins. It provides a detailed and curated classification of protein structures, grouping them into families, superfamilies, and folds based on their structural and sequence similarities.
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
Astronomy Update- Curiosity’s exploration of Mars _ Local Briefs _ leadertele...
Assessing quality and bias in studies
1. Assessing quality and bias in studies
Nicholas Ngwili, ILRI
Online Training on Systematic Literature Review, ILRI Nairobi, 5-6 May 2020
2. What is Quality in studies
Includes two complementary aspects
Methodological quality
Reporting quality
Not about value of the research or importance of
topic!
3. Methodological quality
• Relates to the design and conduct of research
• Is fundamental to understanding the results and the level of
confidence in the findings
• Largely based around assessment of the risk of bias-
selection, performance, detection, attrition, reporting and oth
er biases
4. Tools
• The Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development
and Evaluation (GRADE) systems used.
• Includes a risk of bias assessment but also assessment of;
o Consistency - consistent with those in the other included
studies
o Imprecision - confidence interval associated with a finding
o publication bias
5. Reporting quality
How well a piece of scientific work is written-
whether the work can be replicated.
Poor quality of reporting is common - makes
assessing methodology difficult
Various approaches to improving the quality of
scientific reporting
6. Examples- guidelines on reporting
Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
(EQUATOR) Network specific for study design-
http://www.equator-network.org/
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)
Statement for RCTs
STROBE - STrengthening the Reporting of
OBservational studies in Epidemiology
7. Are quality tools valuable?
Available but not universally accepted- due to
over standardisation of published material.
Challenging if you do not have all the required
information
lack of external validation
8. Quality of qualitative research- points to
note
• Triangulation- compares the results from either
two or more different methods of data collection
• Respondent validation
• Clear exposition of methods of data collection
and analysis
• Sensitivity -Personal and intellectual biases
9. Summary /tips
Look at the individual components of quality,
rather than attempting a binary categorization
into high or low quality
Present in a transparent and understandable
way
10. What is bias?
Systematic error or deviation from the truth- introduced into sampling or
testing by selecting or encouraging one outcome or answer over others
o systematic reviews depend on included studies
o incorrect studies = misleading reviews
o should I believe the results?
o assess each study for risk of bias
o can’t measure the presence of bias
o Bias may overestimate or underestimate the effect
o look for methods shown to minimize risk
11. Bias is not the same as
Imprecision - random error due to sampling variation - reflected in the
confidence interval
Quality - bias can occur in well-conducted studies. Not all methodological
flaws introduce bias
Reporting - good methods may have been used but not well reported
12. Assessing bias in observational studies
Type of bias
Selection mechanisms in recruitment of study participants
(selection bias)- lack of randomness
Selective recall or inconsistent data collection (information
bias), measurement errors
Confounding
13. Errors
• Observational epidemiological studies measure associations
• Association ≠ Causation
• need to consider possible errors
• Systematic error- conclusion that are systematically different-
selection bias, information bias and confounding
• Random error
14. Bias in e.g cross-sectional studies
• Representativeness of study group
• Sample size
• Ascertainment of exposure
• Management of non respondents
• Comparability of exposed and non exposed
• Ascertainment of outcome
• Statistical test
15. Assessing for bias – chapter 8 of the
Cochrane handbook
7 evidence-based domains
review authors’ judgement
Low risk of bias
× High risk of bias
? Unclear
support for judgement
evidence/quotes from the paper or other sources
review author’s explanation
16. References
• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC111
7321/pdf/50.pdf - Assessing quality in qualitative
research.
• https://training.cochrane.org/handbook
• Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S,
Watson P. Qualitative research methods in health
technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Health Technology Assessment 1998;2.
• Dingwall R, Murphy E, Watson P, Greatbatch D,
Parker S. Catching goldfish: quality in qualitative
research. Journal of Health Services Research and
Policy 1998;3:167-72
17. This presentation is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.
better lives through livestock
ilri.org
ILRI thanks all donors and organizations which globally support its work through their contributions
to the CGIAR Trust Fund
Editor's Notes
There MUST be a CGIAR logo or a CRP logo. You can copy and paste the logo you need from the final slide of this presentation. Then you can delete that final slide
To replace a photo above, copy and paste this link in your browser: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ilri/sets/72157632057087650/detail/
Find a photo you like and the right size, copy and paste it in the block above.