Negative Externalities
EdExcel Economics 1.3.2
Negative Production & Consumption Externalities
Negative externalities occur when production and/or consumption
impose external costs on third parties outside of the market for
which no appropriate compensation is paid.
Negative production externalities Negative consumption externalities
• Air pollution from factories • Fly-tipping of household waste
• Damage to the environment
from industrial ocean fishing
• Effects of passing smoking
• External costs of fertilizers and
pesticides used in farming
• Impact on family life of gambling
and alcohol addiction
• Noise pollution from the airline
industry
• Noise pollution from events such
as sports matches and concerts
Examples of Negative Production Externalities
Negative production externalities include pollution generated by a
factory that imposes costs on others
Air pollution
from factories
Pollution from
fertilizers
Industrial waste
Noise pollution Collapsing fish
stocks
Methane
emissions
When
answering
any question
on negative
externalities –
consider
whether the
external costs
are significant
and if so,
whether they
can be
measured
and valued
accurately
World Carbon Dioxide Emissions from 2005 to 2014
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Emissionsinmillionmetrictons
Africa South and Central America Middle East
Europe and Eurasia North America Asia Pacific
Negative Externalities in Production – Market Failure
Output
Marginal
Private
Cost
P1
Q1
Marginal
Private
Benefit
Negative externalities causes social cost > private cost
Costs,
Benefits
£s
Marginal
Social
Cost
Q2
P2
The equilibrium
level of output
delivered by a
free market is at
Q1 where MPB =
MPC and it is
allocatively
inefficient.
We assume in
this example that
there are no
externalities
arising from
consumption
Note
If MSC pivots
away from
MPC then the
marginal
external cost
of extra output
is assumed to
be increasing
Negative Externalities – The Social Welfare Loss
Output
Marginal
Private
Cost
P1
Q1
Marginal
Private
Benefit
Market failure happens when prices do not reflect social costs
Costs,
Benefits
£s
Marginal
Social
Cost
Q2
P2 This is the area
of social welfare
loss because the
market output
supplied is
higher than the
social optimum
Note
The
deadweight
loss of social
welfare
happens when
MSC > MPC
Examples of Negative Consumption Externalities
Negative consumption externalities are spillover costs generated
and received in the consumption of goods and services.
Vehicle
pollution
Household
waste
Noise pollution
from neighbours
Air pollution
from smokers
Traffic
congestion
Gambling
addiction
Litter from
tourists
Spillover costs
from obesity
Reducing Externalities – The Use of Pollution Taxes
• One approach is to impose a tax.
This is known as “making the
polluter pay”.
• A pollution tax increases the
marginal private cost causing a
fall in demand
• Some economists argue that
revenue from pollution taxes
should be ‘ring-fenced’ and
allocated to projects that protect
or enhance the environment.
• For example, money raised from
a congestion charge might be
allocated towards improving
mass transport services
• Revenue from higher taxes on
cigarettes might be used to fund
better health care programmes.
British Columbia uses a
Carbon Tax
China has raised smoking
taxes
Emissions Trading
Scheme in the EU
Proposed congestion
charge for New Delhi
Reducing Externalities: Carbon Trading in the EU
• The EU Carbon Emissions
Trading Scheme is cap-
and-trade scheme for
carbon dioxide
• It sets a decreasing cap for
CO2 from energy intensive
sectors, and allocates or
auctions emissions
allowances which can be
traded on the open
market.
• Businesses need to buy
enough emissions
allowances – the higher
the price, the greater the
incentive to cut pollution
• Aviation has just been
included in the scheme
The consensus is that a carbon allowance price of at
least €30 a tonne is needed to drive investment in low
or zero emission technology. But the EU carbon price
has rarely reached this level. Indeed in recent years, an
excess supply of permits has led to the market price of
carbon permits collapsing to below €10 per tonne
Reducing Externalities: The UK Carbon Price Floor
• The UK has introduced a Carbon
Price Floor which applies to fossil
fuels used for electricity
generation
• The minimum price for carbon
emissions is designed to provide
a stable carbon price signal as a
way of internalising externalities
• The minimum Carbon Price Floor
started at £16/tCO2 in 2013
• In 2014 the UK government
announced a cap of £18/tCO2
from 2016 until 2020
• Carbon prices within the EU ETS
system have been highly volatile
in recent years
Arguments for a carbon price floor
• Reduces the risks, and thus costs, of
investing in low carbon projects
• Helps to reduce carbon price
volatility – sends signal to polluters
• Makes low carbon electricity more
competitive – boost to renewables
Arguments against a carbon price floor
• Restrict supply of carbon permits to
increase the free market price
• A carbon tax is a better alternative
and raises useful tax revenues
• Price floor set high might damage
international competitiveness
Advantages / Disadvantage of Pollution Taxes
Pros Internalizes the
externality and therefore
makes the polluter pay
Utilizes the price
mechanism to change
incentives and choices
e.g. to reduction pollution
Raises tax revenue which
might then be used to
address other market
failures
Cons Low price elasticity of
demand – tax may not
change behaviour
Risk of tax evasion and
tax avoidance
May hit lower income
families most and cause
some social unrest
Topical Examples of Externalities in Transport
Congestion
externalities from
vehicles
Noise and air pollution
from aircraft
Damage to sea bed
from freight containers
The expansion of
electric car ownership
and use
Growth of car sharing
apps reduce single-car
usage
Investment in light rail
infrastructure
Evaluation: Problems with Environmental Taxes
Pollution taxes can lead to government failure:
1. Assigning the right level of taxation: There are problems in
setting the right tax so that private cost will exactly equate with
the social cost
2. Consumer welfare effects: Producers may pass on a tax to the
consumers if the demand for the good is inelastic and, as
result, the tax may only have a small effect in reducing demand.
Taxes on some de-merit goods (for example cigarettes) may
have a regressive effect on lower-income consumers and lead
to a widening of inequalities in the distribution of income.
3. Employment and investment consequences: If pollution taxes
are raised in one country, producers may shift to countries with
lower taxes. This will not reduce global pollution, and create
problems such as structural unemployment and a loss of
international competitiveness / worsening of the trade balance.
Cutting Emissions From Cars – EU Policies in Action
Regulations on Max CO2
Emissions per km Travelled
A command and
control approach
2015: Max 130gms per
km +penalties for
exceeding
Effective in driving
innovation
Cap on emissions
higher than actual
Max limit might shift
FDI outside the EU
Bringing vehicles into the
Emissions Trading Scheme
Cap on emissions –
“allowances” are
traded
Incentives for
investment in low
carbon technologies
Most efficient
emissions reducers can
sell some allowances
Collapse in prices has
eroded the incentives
for investment
Higher road and fuel taxes
Inelastic demand – fuel
taxes generate
significant revenues
Easy to collect and
adjust the rate
Tax depends on actual
fuel consumption not
theoretical level
But cannot guarantee
target specific
reductions in emissions
Progress in Cutting Emissions From Cars in the UK
171.4
169.4
167.2
164.9
158
149.5
144.2
138.1
133.1
128.3
124.7
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
CO²ing/km
Year
Average carbon dioxide emissions from new cars in the UK between 2004 and 2014 (in
grams per kilometre)
Externalities and Government Regulations - Examples
• Health and Safety at Work Act covering all businesses.
• Renewables Obligation Certificates to encourage the supply of
renewable energy (+ penalties for not meeting targets)
• Councils using by-laws preventing public consumption of alcohol.
• Consumer protection legislation e.g. against dangerous goods
• Laws such as the ban on smoking in public places from July 2007
• The European Union has introduced directives on how durables
such as cars, batteries, fridges freezers should be disposed of
• The EU also imposes increasingly tough rules on carbon emissions
from vehicles which all EU manufacturers must meet
• Speed limits on roads and weight limits for lorries
• Quotas on how much fishing can take place in EU waters
• Bans on sale of certain substances / minimum age of legal sale
• Lowering alcohol limit for drivers – reduced by Scotland in 2014
Evaluating the Impact of Industry Regulations
The case for regulating negative
externalities
Costs / disadvantages of adding
extra regulation of industries
• Regulations act as a spur for
business innovation e.g. to cut
the level of carbon emissions
• High cost of enforcement /
administration of laws /
regulations
• Regulations may be more
effective if demand is
unresponsive to price changes
• Regulations can lead to
unwelcome unintended
consequences / Govt failure
• Regulations can be gradually
toughened each year – this will
help stimulate capital
investment
• The cost of meeting
regulations can discourage
small businesses and lower
competition in markets
Negative Externalities
EdExcel Economics 1.3.2

Negative externalities

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Negative Production &Consumption Externalities Negative externalities occur when production and/or consumption impose external costs on third parties outside of the market for which no appropriate compensation is paid. Negative production externalities Negative consumption externalities • Air pollution from factories • Fly-tipping of household waste • Damage to the environment from industrial ocean fishing • Effects of passing smoking • External costs of fertilizers and pesticides used in farming • Impact on family life of gambling and alcohol addiction • Noise pollution from the airline industry • Noise pollution from events such as sports matches and concerts
  • 3.
    Examples of NegativeProduction Externalities Negative production externalities include pollution generated by a factory that imposes costs on others Air pollution from factories Pollution from fertilizers Industrial waste Noise pollution Collapsing fish stocks Methane emissions When answering any question on negative externalities – consider whether the external costs are significant and if so, whether they can be measured and valued accurately
  • 4.
    World Carbon DioxideEmissions from 2005 to 2014 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Emissionsinmillionmetrictons Africa South and Central America Middle East Europe and Eurasia North America Asia Pacific
  • 5.
    Negative Externalities inProduction – Market Failure Output Marginal Private Cost P1 Q1 Marginal Private Benefit Negative externalities causes social cost > private cost Costs, Benefits £s Marginal Social Cost Q2 P2 The equilibrium level of output delivered by a free market is at Q1 where MPB = MPC and it is allocatively inefficient. We assume in this example that there are no externalities arising from consumption Note If MSC pivots away from MPC then the marginal external cost of extra output is assumed to be increasing
  • 6.
    Negative Externalities –The Social Welfare Loss Output Marginal Private Cost P1 Q1 Marginal Private Benefit Market failure happens when prices do not reflect social costs Costs, Benefits £s Marginal Social Cost Q2 P2 This is the area of social welfare loss because the market output supplied is higher than the social optimum Note The deadweight loss of social welfare happens when MSC > MPC
  • 7.
    Examples of NegativeConsumption Externalities Negative consumption externalities are spillover costs generated and received in the consumption of goods and services. Vehicle pollution Household waste Noise pollution from neighbours Air pollution from smokers Traffic congestion Gambling addiction Litter from tourists Spillover costs from obesity
  • 8.
    Reducing Externalities –The Use of Pollution Taxes • One approach is to impose a tax. This is known as “making the polluter pay”. • A pollution tax increases the marginal private cost causing a fall in demand • Some economists argue that revenue from pollution taxes should be ‘ring-fenced’ and allocated to projects that protect or enhance the environment. • For example, money raised from a congestion charge might be allocated towards improving mass transport services • Revenue from higher taxes on cigarettes might be used to fund better health care programmes. British Columbia uses a Carbon Tax China has raised smoking taxes Emissions Trading Scheme in the EU Proposed congestion charge for New Delhi
  • 9.
    Reducing Externalities: CarbonTrading in the EU • The EU Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme is cap- and-trade scheme for carbon dioxide • It sets a decreasing cap for CO2 from energy intensive sectors, and allocates or auctions emissions allowances which can be traded on the open market. • Businesses need to buy enough emissions allowances – the higher the price, the greater the incentive to cut pollution • Aviation has just been included in the scheme The consensus is that a carbon allowance price of at least €30 a tonne is needed to drive investment in low or zero emission technology. But the EU carbon price has rarely reached this level. Indeed in recent years, an excess supply of permits has led to the market price of carbon permits collapsing to below €10 per tonne
  • 10.
    Reducing Externalities: TheUK Carbon Price Floor • The UK has introduced a Carbon Price Floor which applies to fossil fuels used for electricity generation • The minimum price for carbon emissions is designed to provide a stable carbon price signal as a way of internalising externalities • The minimum Carbon Price Floor started at £16/tCO2 in 2013 • In 2014 the UK government announced a cap of £18/tCO2 from 2016 until 2020 • Carbon prices within the EU ETS system have been highly volatile in recent years Arguments for a carbon price floor • Reduces the risks, and thus costs, of investing in low carbon projects • Helps to reduce carbon price volatility – sends signal to polluters • Makes low carbon electricity more competitive – boost to renewables Arguments against a carbon price floor • Restrict supply of carbon permits to increase the free market price • A carbon tax is a better alternative and raises useful tax revenues • Price floor set high might damage international competitiveness
  • 11.
    Advantages / Disadvantageof Pollution Taxes Pros Internalizes the externality and therefore makes the polluter pay Utilizes the price mechanism to change incentives and choices e.g. to reduction pollution Raises tax revenue which might then be used to address other market failures Cons Low price elasticity of demand – tax may not change behaviour Risk of tax evasion and tax avoidance May hit lower income families most and cause some social unrest
  • 12.
    Topical Examples ofExternalities in Transport Congestion externalities from vehicles Noise and air pollution from aircraft Damage to sea bed from freight containers The expansion of electric car ownership and use Growth of car sharing apps reduce single-car usage Investment in light rail infrastructure
  • 13.
    Evaluation: Problems withEnvironmental Taxes Pollution taxes can lead to government failure: 1. Assigning the right level of taxation: There are problems in setting the right tax so that private cost will exactly equate with the social cost 2. Consumer welfare effects: Producers may pass on a tax to the consumers if the demand for the good is inelastic and, as result, the tax may only have a small effect in reducing demand. Taxes on some de-merit goods (for example cigarettes) may have a regressive effect on lower-income consumers and lead to a widening of inequalities in the distribution of income. 3. Employment and investment consequences: If pollution taxes are raised in one country, producers may shift to countries with lower taxes. This will not reduce global pollution, and create problems such as structural unemployment and a loss of international competitiveness / worsening of the trade balance.
  • 14.
    Cutting Emissions FromCars – EU Policies in Action Regulations on Max CO2 Emissions per km Travelled A command and control approach 2015: Max 130gms per km +penalties for exceeding Effective in driving innovation Cap on emissions higher than actual Max limit might shift FDI outside the EU Bringing vehicles into the Emissions Trading Scheme Cap on emissions – “allowances” are traded Incentives for investment in low carbon technologies Most efficient emissions reducers can sell some allowances Collapse in prices has eroded the incentives for investment Higher road and fuel taxes Inelastic demand – fuel taxes generate significant revenues Easy to collect and adjust the rate Tax depends on actual fuel consumption not theoretical level But cannot guarantee target specific reductions in emissions
  • 15.
    Progress in CuttingEmissions From Cars in the UK 171.4 169.4 167.2 164.9 158 149.5 144.2 138.1 133.1 128.3 124.7 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 CO²ing/km Year Average carbon dioxide emissions from new cars in the UK between 2004 and 2014 (in grams per kilometre)
  • 16.
    Externalities and GovernmentRegulations - Examples • Health and Safety at Work Act covering all businesses. • Renewables Obligation Certificates to encourage the supply of renewable energy (+ penalties for not meeting targets) • Councils using by-laws preventing public consumption of alcohol. • Consumer protection legislation e.g. against dangerous goods • Laws such as the ban on smoking in public places from July 2007 • The European Union has introduced directives on how durables such as cars, batteries, fridges freezers should be disposed of • The EU also imposes increasingly tough rules on carbon emissions from vehicles which all EU manufacturers must meet • Speed limits on roads and weight limits for lorries • Quotas on how much fishing can take place in EU waters • Bans on sale of certain substances / minimum age of legal sale • Lowering alcohol limit for drivers – reduced by Scotland in 2014
  • 17.
    Evaluating the Impactof Industry Regulations The case for regulating negative externalities Costs / disadvantages of adding extra regulation of industries • Regulations act as a spur for business innovation e.g. to cut the level of carbon emissions • High cost of enforcement / administration of laws / regulations • Regulations may be more effective if demand is unresponsive to price changes • Regulations can lead to unwelcome unintended consequences / Govt failure • Regulations can be gradually toughened each year – this will help stimulate capital investment • The cost of meeting regulations can discourage small businesses and lower competition in markets
  • 18.