PRESENTATION ON:
MULLER-BRESLAU PRINCIPLE.
 SHAIKH MOHD. AMIR N. 150860106062
 PRAJAPATI RIYA P. 150860106054
 BHANDARI NEENAD H. 150860106006
 RATHOD NEHA M. 150860106055
 HISTORY
 MULLER-BRESLAU PRINCIPLE
 EXPLANATION
 GENERAL PROCEDURE
 DEFLECTED SHAPES
 Heinrich Franz Bernhard Müller was born in
Wroclaw (Breslau) on 13 May1851.
 In 1875 he opened a civil engineer‘s office in
Berlin. Around this time he decided to add the
name of his hometown to his surname, becoming
known as Muller-Breslau.
 In 1883 Muller-Breslau became a lecturer and in
1885 a professor in civil engineering at the
Technische Hochschule in Hanover.
 In 1886, Heinrich Müller-Breslau develop a
method for rapidly constructing the shape of an
influence line.
 “IF AN INTERNAL STRESS COMPONENT OR A
RECTION COMPONENT IS CONSIDERED TO
ACT THROUGH SOME SMALL DISTANCE AND
THERE BY TO DEFLECT OR DISPLACE A
STRUCTURE, THE CURVE OF THE DEFLECTED
OR DISPLACED STRUCTURE WILL BE, TO SOME
SCALE, THE INFLUENCE LINE FOR THE STRESS
OR REACTION COMPONENT”.
 The Muller-Breslau principle uses Betti's law of
virtual work to construct influence lines. To
illustrate the method let us consider a structure
AB (Figure a).
 Let us apply a unit downward force at a distance
x from A , at point C .
 Let us assume that it creates the vertical
reactions RA and RB at supports A and B ,
respectively (Figure b). Let us call this condition
“System 1.”
 In “System 2” (figure c), we have the same
structure with a unit deflection applied in the
direction of RA . Here Δ is the deflection at point
C .
Figure,(a) GIVEN SYSTEM AB,
(b) SYSTEM1,STRUCTURE UNDER A UNIT LOAD
(c) SYSTEM2,STRUCTURE WITH A UNIT DEFLECTION CORRESPONDING TO RA
 According to Betti's law, the virtual work done by
the forces in System 1 going through the
Corresponding displacements in System 2 should
be equal to the virtual work done by the forces in
System 2 going through the corresponding
displacements in System 1. For these two
systems, we can write:
(RA)(1) + (1)(- Δ) =0
 The right side of this equation is zero, because in
System 2 forces can exist only at the supports,
corresponding to which the displacements in
System 1 (at supports A and B ) are zero. The
negative sign before Δ accounts for the fact that
it acts against the unit load in System 1.
 Solving this equation we get:
RA= Δ.
 In other words, the reaction at support A due
to a unit load at point C is equal to the
displacement at point C when the structure is
subjected to a unit displacement
corresponding to the positive direction of
support reaction at A .
 Similarly, we can place the unit load at any
other point and obtain the support reaction
due to that from System 2.
 Thus the deflection pattern in System 2
represents the influence line for RA .
 STEP-1: TO DRAW ILD FOR ANY SUPPORT
REMOVE THAT SUPPORT.
 STEP-2: APPLY UNIT LOAD AT THAT
SUPPORT.
 STEP-3: DRAW BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM
FOR THAT SUPPORT.
 STEP-4: CONSTRUCT CONJUGATE BEAM.
 STEP-5: FIND DEFLECTION AT SOME
SPECIFIED INTERVALS ( WE KNOW THAT FOR A
CONJUGATE BEAM, DEFLECTION AT ANY
POINT = BM AT THAT POINT).
 STEP-6: DIVIDE EACH DEFLECTION BY
DEFLECTION CORRESPONDING TO THE POINT OF
APPLICATION OF UNIT LOAD.
 STEP-7: WE OBTAIN THE ORDINATES FOR THE
INFLUENCE FOR THAT PARTICULAR SUPPORT.
 STEP-8: FOR OTHER SUPPORT REPEAT THE SAME
PROCEDURE.
 STEP-9: FOR ILD OF BENDING MOMENT,
CONSTRUCT A STATIC EQUATIONS FROM THE
BEAM AND SUBSTITUTE VALUES AT DIFFERENT
INTERVAL AND YOU WILL GET ORDINATES OF ILD
FOR BMD.
 STEP-10: FOR SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM
CONSTRUCT STATIC EQUATIONS AND SOLVE.
 ILD FOR SIMPLY
SUPPORTED BEAM:
 ILD FOR TWO SPAN
CONTINOUS BEAM:
 ILD FOR
THREE SPAN
CONTINOUS BEAM:
THANK YOU...

Muller breslau

  • 1.
  • 2.
     SHAIKH MOHD.AMIR N. 150860106062  PRAJAPATI RIYA P. 150860106054  BHANDARI NEENAD H. 150860106006  RATHOD NEHA M. 150860106055
  • 3.
     HISTORY  MULLER-BRESLAUPRINCIPLE  EXPLANATION  GENERAL PROCEDURE  DEFLECTED SHAPES
  • 4.
     Heinrich FranzBernhard Müller was born in Wroclaw (Breslau) on 13 May1851.  In 1875 he opened a civil engineer‘s office in Berlin. Around this time he decided to add the name of his hometown to his surname, becoming known as Muller-Breslau.  In 1883 Muller-Breslau became a lecturer and in 1885 a professor in civil engineering at the Technische Hochschule in Hanover.  In 1886, Heinrich Müller-Breslau develop a method for rapidly constructing the shape of an influence line.
  • 5.
     “IF ANINTERNAL STRESS COMPONENT OR A RECTION COMPONENT IS CONSIDERED TO ACT THROUGH SOME SMALL DISTANCE AND THERE BY TO DEFLECT OR DISPLACE A STRUCTURE, THE CURVE OF THE DEFLECTED OR DISPLACED STRUCTURE WILL BE, TO SOME SCALE, THE INFLUENCE LINE FOR THE STRESS OR REACTION COMPONENT”.
  • 6.
     The Muller-Breslauprinciple uses Betti's law of virtual work to construct influence lines. To illustrate the method let us consider a structure AB (Figure a).  Let us apply a unit downward force at a distance x from A , at point C .  Let us assume that it creates the vertical reactions RA and RB at supports A and B , respectively (Figure b). Let us call this condition “System 1.”  In “System 2” (figure c), we have the same structure with a unit deflection applied in the direction of RA . Here Δ is the deflection at point C .
  • 7.
    Figure,(a) GIVEN SYSTEMAB, (b) SYSTEM1,STRUCTURE UNDER A UNIT LOAD (c) SYSTEM2,STRUCTURE WITH A UNIT DEFLECTION CORRESPONDING TO RA
  • 8.
     According toBetti's law, the virtual work done by the forces in System 1 going through the Corresponding displacements in System 2 should be equal to the virtual work done by the forces in System 2 going through the corresponding displacements in System 1. For these two systems, we can write: (RA)(1) + (1)(- Δ) =0  The right side of this equation is zero, because in System 2 forces can exist only at the supports, corresponding to which the displacements in System 1 (at supports A and B ) are zero. The negative sign before Δ accounts for the fact that it acts against the unit load in System 1.  Solving this equation we get: RA= Δ.
  • 9.
     In otherwords, the reaction at support A due to a unit load at point C is equal to the displacement at point C when the structure is subjected to a unit displacement corresponding to the positive direction of support reaction at A .  Similarly, we can place the unit load at any other point and obtain the support reaction due to that from System 2.  Thus the deflection pattern in System 2 represents the influence line for RA .
  • 10.
     STEP-1: TODRAW ILD FOR ANY SUPPORT REMOVE THAT SUPPORT.  STEP-2: APPLY UNIT LOAD AT THAT SUPPORT.  STEP-3: DRAW BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM FOR THAT SUPPORT.  STEP-4: CONSTRUCT CONJUGATE BEAM.  STEP-5: FIND DEFLECTION AT SOME SPECIFIED INTERVALS ( WE KNOW THAT FOR A CONJUGATE BEAM, DEFLECTION AT ANY POINT = BM AT THAT POINT).
  • 11.
     STEP-6: DIVIDEEACH DEFLECTION BY DEFLECTION CORRESPONDING TO THE POINT OF APPLICATION OF UNIT LOAD.  STEP-7: WE OBTAIN THE ORDINATES FOR THE INFLUENCE FOR THAT PARTICULAR SUPPORT.  STEP-8: FOR OTHER SUPPORT REPEAT THE SAME PROCEDURE.  STEP-9: FOR ILD OF BENDING MOMENT, CONSTRUCT A STATIC EQUATIONS FROM THE BEAM AND SUBSTITUTE VALUES AT DIFFERENT INTERVAL AND YOU WILL GET ORDINATES OF ILD FOR BMD.  STEP-10: FOR SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM CONSTRUCT STATIC EQUATIONS AND SOLVE.
  • 12.
     ILD FORSIMPLY SUPPORTED BEAM:
  • 13.
     ILD FORTWO SPAN CONTINOUS BEAM:
  • 14.
     ILD FOR THREESPAN CONTINOUS BEAM:
  • 15.