Management of
Appendicular lump
Dr Dhaval Mangukiya
SIDS Hospital & Rearch Center
Appendicular Lump
Inflammatory tumor consisting of the inflamed appendix, its adjacent viscera, and
the greater omentum
Basics to Above the Basics
Incidence
2-7 %
Immediate appendectomy may be technically demanding because of the distorted
anatomy and difficulties in closing the appendiceal stump due to the inflamed
tissues.
Failure of Non surgical treatment
2-4 %
Safe Approach Interval Laparoscopy
Am Surg. 1994 Oct;60(10):753-8.
Appendiceal Mass: Conservative Therapy Followed by
Interval Laparoscopic Appendectomy
233 patients
Dig. Surg. 2002;19(3):216-20; discussion 221
The Need for Interval Appendectomy After Resolution of an Appendiceal Mass
Questioned
Paul J Willemsenet al
● When causes for the appendiceal mass other than appendicitis are excluded,
interval appendectomy seems unnecessary in patients who respond well to
initial conservative treatment.
Ann Surg. 2007 Nov;246(5):741-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31811f3f9f.
Nonsurgical Treatment of Appendiceal Abscess or
Phlegmon: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Immediate surgery is associated with a higher morbidity compared with nonsurgical treatment
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012 Jan-Mar; 5(1): 33–35.
Evaluating conservative treatment for
acute appendicitis with lump formation
Ajaz Ahmad Malik, Mohd Lateef Wani, Shadab Nabi Wani, Fazl Qadir Parray, Nayeem-Ul-Hassan, and Ifat Irshad
Conservative treatment of appendicitis with lump formation is efficient and the recurrence rate is low. Routine interval appendectomy
after initial conservative treatment for lump formation is not a cost-effective intervention and not recommended.
Am Surg. 2016 Jan;82(1):11-5.
A Systematic Review of Perforated Appendicitis and
Phlegmon: Interval Appendectomy or Wait-and-See?
Ghaleb Darwazeh, Steven C Cunningham, Gopal C Kowdley
21 studies with non operative and 5 studies with with interval surgery
1943 patients, of which 1400 patients were managed nonsurgically and 543
patients underwent interval appendectomy
Nonoperative treatment had a mean recurrence of 12.4 per cent, a morbidity of
13.3 per cent, and the length of hospital stay was 9.6 days.
Interval appendectomy morbidity was 10.4 per cent and 5.0 days, respectively
Early Surgery
Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery 2010;16 (1):43-4
Does Ochsner-Sherren regimen still hold true in the management of appendicular
mass? Narayanan Dhanasekharan et al
Retrospective study
Total 506 patients
Appendicular lump 114 patients
Low morbidity, reduced hospital stay, low cost, and patient compliance favor early operative management
for appendicular mass, and it also avoids the possibility of missing entities like intestinal/peritoneal
tuberculosis, which have similar presentations and are especially common in a country like India.
International Surgery Journal Patel BJ et al. Int Surg J. 2015 May;2(2):235-238
A comparative study of appendicular lump management
Retrospective study
598 patients with Acute appendicitis
64 with appendicular lump taken in study
Early exploration is safe, confirms the diagnosis, removes need for readmission,
curative, time saving, reduces cost of management and shorten hospital stay with
early return to work.
Early Surgery
Options of treatment
● Emergency surgery (may need ileocolonic resection)
● Conservative management followed by interval surgery
● Totally conservative management without interval surgery
Conservative treatment
Associated with a risk of missing or delayed hidden pathologies such as cecal cancer
or Crohn's disease in about 2 to 3% of the patients
In INDIA - Tuberculosis
Colonoscopy and / or CT Scan is must (should be after 4 to 6 weeks)
Emergency surgery
High frequency of complication
Conducting colonic resection sometimes necessary
Interval Surgery
Symptomatic during waiting time
Chances of appendicular abscess or perforation
May need pigtail or interim exploration
How to choose
Randomised controlled trial
Clinical Trial Indian J Gastroenterol. Sep-Oct 2004;23(5):165-7.
Treatment of Appendiceal Mass: Prospective,
Randomized Clinical Trial
Of the three treatment modalities compared, conservative treatment without subsequent appendectomy appears to be the
best.
Int Surg. 2015 Jun; 100(6): 1021–1025.
Management of Appendiceal Mass and Abscess. An 11-Year Experience
Zaza Demetrashvili, Giorgi Kenchadze, Irakli Pipia, Eka Ekaladze, and George Kamkamidze
No Definite Conclusion
Factors to consider
Age / Preop fitness
Imaging
Clinical Signs
Intraoperative decision
Dissection
Intraoperative decision
Thickened appendicular base Inflammed Caecum
Intraoperative decision
Appendicula stump
SIDS Data Tertiary care referral
● Surgery for Acute Appendicitis by 14 surgeons of Surat – 282
● Perforated / Abscess / Peritonitis / Lump – 128 (15 cases open)
● Right Colectomy – 16 (2 Open / 14 Laparoscopic)
● SIDS – Emergency surgery, conservative only in unfit or non willing patients
Interesting Appendix Case 1
Two episodes of admission for recurrent acute appendicitis
Appendicular lump managed conservatively
Presented with Appendicular abscess
Case Video
Interesting Appendix Case 2
Large mucocele forming appendicular lump
Case Video
Thank you very much for attention

Management of Appendicular Lump

  • 1.
    Management of Appendicular lump DrDhaval Mangukiya SIDS Hospital & Rearch Center
  • 2.
    Appendicular Lump Inflammatory tumorconsisting of the inflamed appendix, its adjacent viscera, and the greater omentum
  • 3.
    Basics to Abovethe Basics
  • 4.
    Incidence 2-7 % Immediate appendectomymay be technically demanding because of the distorted anatomy and difficulties in closing the appendiceal stump due to the inflamed tissues. Failure of Non surgical treatment 2-4 %
  • 5.
    Safe Approach IntervalLaparoscopy Am Surg. 1994 Oct;60(10):753-8. Appendiceal Mass: Conservative Therapy Followed by Interval Laparoscopic Appendectomy
  • 6.
    233 patients Dig. Surg.2002;19(3):216-20; discussion 221 The Need for Interval Appendectomy After Resolution of an Appendiceal Mass Questioned Paul J Willemsenet al ● When causes for the appendiceal mass other than appendicitis are excluded, interval appendectomy seems unnecessary in patients who respond well to initial conservative treatment.
  • 7.
    Ann Surg. 2007Nov;246(5):741-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31811f3f9f. Nonsurgical Treatment of Appendiceal Abscess or Phlegmon: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Immediate surgery is associated with a higher morbidity compared with nonsurgical treatment
  • 8.
    J Emerg TraumaShock. 2012 Jan-Mar; 5(1): 33–35. Evaluating conservative treatment for acute appendicitis with lump formation Ajaz Ahmad Malik, Mohd Lateef Wani, Shadab Nabi Wani, Fazl Qadir Parray, Nayeem-Ul-Hassan, and Ifat Irshad Conservative treatment of appendicitis with lump formation is efficient and the recurrence rate is low. Routine interval appendectomy after initial conservative treatment for lump formation is not a cost-effective intervention and not recommended.
  • 9.
    Am Surg. 2016Jan;82(1):11-5. A Systematic Review of Perforated Appendicitis and Phlegmon: Interval Appendectomy or Wait-and-See? Ghaleb Darwazeh, Steven C Cunningham, Gopal C Kowdley 21 studies with non operative and 5 studies with with interval surgery 1943 patients, of which 1400 patients were managed nonsurgically and 543 patients underwent interval appendectomy Nonoperative treatment had a mean recurrence of 12.4 per cent, a morbidity of 13.3 per cent, and the length of hospital stay was 9.6 days. Interval appendectomy morbidity was 10.4 per cent and 5.0 days, respectively
  • 10.
    Early Surgery Turkish Journalof Trauma & Emergency Surgery 2010;16 (1):43-4 Does Ochsner-Sherren regimen still hold true in the management of appendicular mass? Narayanan Dhanasekharan et al Retrospective study Total 506 patients Appendicular lump 114 patients Low morbidity, reduced hospital stay, low cost, and patient compliance favor early operative management for appendicular mass, and it also avoids the possibility of missing entities like intestinal/peritoneal tuberculosis, which have similar presentations and are especially common in a country like India.
  • 11.
    International Surgery JournalPatel BJ et al. Int Surg J. 2015 May;2(2):235-238 A comparative study of appendicular lump management Retrospective study 598 patients with Acute appendicitis 64 with appendicular lump taken in study Early exploration is safe, confirms the diagnosis, removes need for readmission, curative, time saving, reduces cost of management and shorten hospital stay with early return to work. Early Surgery
  • 12.
    Options of treatment ●Emergency surgery (may need ileocolonic resection) ● Conservative management followed by interval surgery ● Totally conservative management without interval surgery
  • 13.
    Conservative treatment Associated witha risk of missing or delayed hidden pathologies such as cecal cancer or Crohn's disease in about 2 to 3% of the patients In INDIA - Tuberculosis Colonoscopy and / or CT Scan is must (should be after 4 to 6 weeks)
  • 14.
    Emergency surgery High frequencyof complication Conducting colonic resection sometimes necessary
  • 15.
    Interval Surgery Symptomatic duringwaiting time Chances of appendicular abscess or perforation May need pigtail or interim exploration
  • 16.
    How to choose Randomisedcontrolled trial Clinical Trial Indian J Gastroenterol. Sep-Oct 2004;23(5):165-7. Treatment of Appendiceal Mass: Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial Of the three treatment modalities compared, conservative treatment without subsequent appendectomy appears to be the best.
  • 17.
    Int Surg. 2015Jun; 100(6): 1021–1025. Management of Appendiceal Mass and Abscess. An 11-Year Experience Zaza Demetrashvili, Giorgi Kenchadze, Irakli Pipia, Eka Ekaladze, and George Kamkamidze
  • 18.
  • 19.
    Factors to consider Age/ Preop fitness Imaging Clinical Signs
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
    SIDS Data Tertiarycare referral ● Surgery for Acute Appendicitis by 14 surgeons of Surat – 282 ● Perforated / Abscess / Peritonitis / Lump – 128 (15 cases open) ● Right Colectomy – 16 (2 Open / 14 Laparoscopic) ● SIDS – Emergency surgery, conservative only in unfit or non willing patients
  • 24.
    Interesting Appendix Case1 Two episodes of admission for recurrent acute appendicitis Appendicular lump managed conservatively Presented with Appendicular abscess Case Video
  • 25.
    Interesting Appendix Case2 Large mucocele forming appendicular lump Case Video
  • 26.
    Thank you verymuch for attention