SlideShare a Scribd company logo
API 510 Preparatory ClassAPI 510 Preparatory Class
Lesson 11Lesson 11
Corrosion CalculationsCorrosion Calculations
A 60 foot tower consisting of four (4) shell courses was
found to have varying corrosion rates in each course.
Minimum wall thickness readings were taken after 4 years
and 6 months of service. All original wall thicknesses
included a 1/8" corrosion allowance.
The top course's original thickness was .3125". The present
thickness is .3000". The second course downward had an
original thickness of .375".
During the inspection it was found to have a minimum wall
thickness of .349". The third course was measured at .440"
its original thickness was .500". The bottom course had an
original thickness of .625" and measured to be .595".
Corrosion Example Problems
Determine the metal loss for the top course, the corrosion
rate for the second course, the corrosion allowance
remaining in the third course, the retirement date for the
bottom course.
Corrosion Example Problems
Solution A:
TOP COURSE:
Metal loss equals the previous thickness minus the present
thickness.
Previous .3125"
Present -.3000"
.0125" Metal Loss
Corrosion Example Problems
SECOND COURSE:
Corrosion rate equals metal loss per given unit of time.
Previous .3750“
Present - .3490"
.0260"
Metal Loss = = .006"/ Per Year
Corrosion Example Problems
yearsTime
Loss
5.4
"0260.
THIRD COURSE:
Remaining Corrosion Allowance equals the actual thickness
minus the required thickness.
Original Thickness .500"
Original C. A. -.125"
Required Wall Thickness .375"
Actual Wall Thickness .440"
Required Wall -.375"
Remaining C.A. .065“
Corrosion Example Problems
BOTTOM COURSE
Remaining life equals the remaining corrosion allowance
divided by the corrosion rate.
1. Required Thickness
Original Thickness .625"
Original C. A. -.125"
Required Thickness .500“
Corrosion Example Problems
2.Remaining Corrosion Allowance
Actual Wall Thickness .595“
Required Thickness -.500"
Remaining Corr. Allow .095“
3.Corrosion Rate
Original Thickness .625"
Present Thickness -.595“
Metal Loss .030"
Metal Loss .030“ = Corrosion Rate = .0067"/Yr.
Time 4.5 Years
Corrosion Example Problems
4. Remaining Life
Corrosion Allowance.095“ = 14.2 Yrs. Remaining Life
Corrosion Rate .0067"/Yr.
Corrosion Example Problems
Corrosion
Just Milling Around
In the previous examples we calculated using decimal
fractions of an inch such as .006”. However questions
on the exam often have the format of Mils or
thousandths of and inch. So if you are not familiar with
this terminology here are some examples.
.1 = 1/10th
of an inch
.01 = 1/100th
of an inch
.001 = 1/1000th
of an inch or 1 Mil.  this is what is
used.
Take our example above .006” this translates to 6 Mils.
.0067” translates to 6.7 Mils.
Class Quiz # 24
Just Milling Around
1. Convert the following decimal fractions into Mils.
.195” = _____ Mils
. 023” = _____ Mils
.009” = _____ Mils.
.0011” =______Mils.
2. Convert our previous Remaining Life problem into Mils.
Corrosion Allowance .095“ = 14.2 Yrs. Remaining Life
Corrosion Rate .0067"
Solution
Just Milling Around
Converting the following decimal fractions into Mils.
.195” = 195 Mils
.023 = 23 Mils
.009 = 9 Mils.
.0011 = 1.1 Mils.
Corrosion Allowance 95 Mils = 14.2 Yrs. Rem. Life
Corrosion Rate 6.7“ Mils/Yr.
Time
A year has 12 parts
The next issue is how do you handle the odd months in
a year. Its all good when it has been an even number of
years. However what about 2 years and 5 months?
Five months is 5/12th
of a year. 5/12 = .416 years
rounded to 3 places. Of course 6 months is then 6/12 or
.5 years.
Example: Based on 4.416 years and a metal loss of 50
Mils we have;
Metal Loss 50 Mils = Corrosion Rate = 11.3 Mils/Yr.
Time 4.416 Years
Class Quiz # 25
Time
1. A vessel shell course was replaced in October 1st
of
1980. The initial or, baseline thickness was .505”. The
most recent actual thickness measured was .485” in
January 1st
1991. What is the corrosion rate, based in
Mils per year in January of 1991.
Solution
.505(t-initial) - .485(t-actual) = .020” = 20 Mils
Oct.1st
1990 – Oct.1st
1980 = 10 years plus November,
December of 1990 and January of 1991 so; 10 yrs. 3 Mos.
10 - 3/12th
(3/12 = .250) = 10.25 years
Therefore;
Metal Loss 20 Mils = Corrosion Rate = 1.95 Mils/Yr.
Time 10.25 Years
Yes, in the API 510 there are, the Long Term and Short
Term. Here is the Long Term. From API 510 6.4 page 6-3
The long term (L.T.) corrosion rate shall be calculated from
the following formula:
Corrosion rate (L.T.) =
Can there be two Corrosion Rates?
t(actual)andt(inital)between)time(years
t(actual)-t(inital)
The short term (S.T.) corrosion rate shall be calculated from the
following formula:
 
Corrosion rate (S.T.) =
Corrosion Example Problems
actualtandprevioustbetween(years)time
actualtprevioust -
tinitial = the thickness, in inches(millimeters), at the same
location as t actual measured at the initial installation or at
the commencement of a new corrosion rate environment.
tprevious = the thickness, in inches(millimeters), at the same
location as t actual measured during a previous inspection.
Long-term and short-term corrosion rates should be
compared to as part of the data assessment. The authorized
inspector, in consultation with a corrosion specialist, shall
select the corrosion rate that best reflects the current
process.
Corrosion Example Problems
Example:
A vessel shell had a second set of ultrasonic thickness
measurements after 1 year of service, the original baseline
wall thickness was 0.500”, and the second set revealed that
the shell was now at 0.489”. Five years later a third set of
wall readings were taken and the shell was measured to be
0.459”.
What value should be used in the Remaining Life
calculations? Comparing short term to long term corrosion
we find the following values. Normally the most aggressive
will be used and in this case it will be the Long Term
Corrosion Rate.
Corrosion Example Problems
L.T. = = 6.8 Mils/ year
S.T. = = 6 Mils/ year
The remaining life of the vessel shall be calculated from the
following formula:
Remaining life (years) = (6.4)
Corrosion Example Problems
years6
0.4590.500-
years5
0.459-0.489
ratecorrosion
requiredt-actualt
tactual = the actual minimum thickness, in inches determined
at the time of inspection for a given location or component.
trequired = the required thickness in inches at the same
location or component as the t actual measurement
computed by the design formulas (e.g. , pressure and
structural) before corrosion allowance and manufacturer’s….
Example: Determine Remaining life of the vessel shell
course in the example above. T required thickness of the
shell course is 0.388” (known as t minimum). Compare S.T. and
L.T. corrosion rates as follows:
S.T. rate = 0.006” or 6 Mils a year
L.T. rate = 0.0068” or 6.8 Mils a year
Corrosion Example Problems
Therefore we will use the most aggressive corrosion rate
found to be the Long Term Rate.
Remaining life (years)
What would be the maximum length of time before the next
inspection?
ANS: ½ the Remaining Life or 10 years whichever is less.
Therefore: 17.79/2 = 8.895 years
Corrosion Example Problems
Yrs
Mils
Mils
79.17
8.6
121
"0068.0
"121.0
yeara0.0068"
0.338"-0.459"
===
What would be the maximum length of time before the next
inspection? From: API 510 page 6-2
6.4 Internal An On-Stream Inspection
The period between internal or on-stream inspections shall
not exceed one half the estimated remaining life of the
vessel based on corrosion rate or 10 years, whichever is
less. In cases where the remaining safe operating life is
estimated to be less than 4 years, the inspection interval
may be the full remaining safe operating life up to a
maximum of 2 years.
ANS: ½ the Remaining Life or 10 years whichever is less.
Therefore: 17.79/2 = 8.895 years
Corrosion Example Problems
(a) (the second a) For a corroded area of considerable size
in which the Circumferential Stress Govern, the least
thickness along the most critical element of the area may be
averaged over a length not exceeding the following:
1. For vessels with the inside diameters less than or equal to
60 inches one half the vessel diameter or 20 inches
whichever is less.
2. For vessels with the inside diameters greater than 60
inches one third the vessel diameter or 40 inches whichever
is less.
Example 5.7 Page 5-3
Corrosion
For a corroded area of considerable size in which the
Circumferential Stress Govern, the least thickness along
the most critical element of the area may be averaged over
a length not exceeding the following:
1. For vessels with the inside diameters less than or equal to
60 inches one half the vessel diameter or 20 inches
whichever is less.
2. For vessels with the inside diameters greater than 60
inches one third the vessel diameter or 40 inches whichever
is less.
Corrosion and Minimum Thickness Evaluation
5.7
When the area contains an opening the distance on either side
of the opening within which the thicknesses are averaged shall
not extend beyond the limits of the reinforcement as defined in
the ASME Code.
Corrosion and Minimum Thickness
Evaluation
See Fig. UG-37 and refer to reinforcement calculations for
determining the extra metal in the shell.
For Limits:
d ( t – tr
) or 2(t + tn
) ( t – tr
)
Use the Larger
Widely scattered pits may be ignored as long as the
following are true:
Corrosion and Minimum Thickness
Evaluation
1. The remaining thickness below the pit is greater than
one-half the required thickness. (1/2 t required)
1.0” – 0.125” = 0.875” the required thickness
Therefore no pit equal to 0.875”/2 = 0.4375” or greater!
Pit #3  0.402 < 0.4375” Acceptable.
2. The total area of the pits does not exceed 7 square inches
(45 sq. centimeters) within any 8 inch (20 centimeter)
diameter circle.
 
We will assume the pits to be circles and use the formula Pi
x Radius Squared to determine the area of each pit.
Pit # One 3.141 x (0.170/2) 2
= 0.085 2
= 0.0226 sq.
in.
Pit # Two 3.141 x (0.330/2) 2
= 0.165 2
= 0.0855 sq. in.
Pit # Three 3.141 x (0.250/2) 2
= 0.125 2
= 0.0490 sq.
in.
Pit # Four 3.141 x (0.377/2) 2
= 0.1185 2
= 0.1116 sq.
in.
Total: 0.2678 sq. in.
less than 7 sq. inches Acceptable!
Corrosion and Minimum Thickness Evaluation
3. The sum of their dimensions along any straight line within
the circle does not exceed 2 inches
Straight line for pits 1-3-4
#1. 0.170”
#3. 0.250”
#4. 0.377”
Total 0.797” < 2 inches Acceptable
When the surface at a weld with a joint factor other than 1.0
as well as the surfaces remote from the weld is corroded, an
independent calculation using the appropriate weld joint
factor must be made to determine if thickness at the weld or
remote from the weld governs the allowable working
pressure.
Corrosion and Minimum Thickness
Evaluation
For this calculation the surface at a weld includes 1 inch on
either side of the weld, (measured from the toe of the weld),
or twice the minimum thickness on either side of the weld,
whichever is greater.
Corrosion and Minimum Thickness
Evaluation
When measuring the corroded thickness of ellipsoidal
and torispherical heads the governing thickness may be
as follows:
1. The thickness of the knuckle region with the head rating
calculated by the appropriate head formula.
2. The thickness of the central portion of the dished region in
which case the dished region may be considered to be a
spherical segment whose allowable pressure is
calculated by the Code formula for spherical shells.
Corrosion and Minimum Thickness
Evaluation
3. For calculating the spherical portion using the spherical
formula the following applies to find the spherical radius L:
a. L = the OD of the Torispherical head
b. L = the ID of the shell times 90% for 2 to 1 Ellipsoidal
heads
See 5.7 second e.
Corrosion and Minimum Thickness
Evaluation
Corrosion Over
And Out…

More Related Content

What's hot

Asme b31.3 interpretation
Asme b31.3 interpretationAsme b31.3 interpretation
Asme b31.3 interpretation
Kathia Espinoza Rojas
 
343312365 mt-ppt
343312365 mt-ppt343312365 mt-ppt
343312365 mt-ppt
MohamedAwad197
 
Storage tank inspection presentation
Storage tank inspection presentationStorage tank inspection presentation
Storage tank inspection presentation
Ian Moore
 
Asme section ii c new
Asme section ii c newAsme section ii c new
Asme section ii c new
Jithu John
 
API 570 B31.3 qustion.pdf
API 570 B31.3 qustion.pdfAPI 570 B31.3 qustion.pdf
API 570 B31.3 qustion.pdf
EmmanuelMatutu
 
ASME SEC IX PPT.pdf
ASME SEC IX PPT.pdfASME SEC IX PPT.pdf
ASME SEC IX PPT.pdf
PKNanavati
 
143137557 storage-tanks
143137557 storage-tanks143137557 storage-tanks
143137557 storage-tanks
bernard347
 
Ffs assessment
Ffs assessmentFfs assessment
Ffs assessment
Muhammad Akhtar
 
Api 650 & 653 questions closed book with answers
Api 650 & 653 questions closed book with answersApi 650 & 653 questions closed book with answers
Api 650 & 653 questions closed book with answers
Jasminder singh
 
How to Qualify a Welding Procedure
How to Qualify a Welding ProcedureHow to Qualify a Welding Procedure
How to Qualify a Welding Procedure
Antonius Pompi Bramono
 
Inspection of-pressure-vessels
Inspection of-pressure-vesselsInspection of-pressure-vessels
Inspection of-pressure-vessels
Rodolfo Barbosa Young
 
API 570 open book.pdf
API 570 open book.pdfAPI 570 open book.pdf
API 570 open book.pdf
EmmanuelMatutu
 
Asme b31,pressure piping code
Asme b31,pressure piping codeAsme b31,pressure piping code
Asme b31,pressure piping code
Sayed Salah Elsawey
 
Piping material-specification
Piping material-specificationPiping material-specification
Piping material-specification
ChiragShah127
 
Presentation on wpqr wps asme_ix
Presentation on wpqr wps asme_ixPresentation on wpqr wps asme_ix
Presentation on wpqr wps asme_ix
mayank0738
 
Api 510-closed-2
Api 510-closed-2Api 510-closed-2
Api 510-closed-2
Tariq Mahmood
 
Cswip welding inspection notes and questions
Cswip welding inspection notes and questionsCswip welding inspection notes and questions
Cswip welding inspection notes and questions
Karthik Banari
 
OCS Training - API 570 piping inspection course
OCS Training - API 570 piping inspection courseOCS Training - API 570 piping inspection course
OCS Training - API 570 piping inspection course
Muanisa Waras
 
Api 570 course material
Api 570 course materialApi 570 course material
Api 570 course material
TASSIO DOURADO
 
Api 5 l 44 ed psl 1 & psl 2
Api 5 l 44 ed psl 1 & psl 2Api 5 l 44 ed psl 1 & psl 2
Api 5 l 44 ed psl 1 & psl 2
Henry Hutabarat
 

What's hot (20)

Asme b31.3 interpretation
Asme b31.3 interpretationAsme b31.3 interpretation
Asme b31.3 interpretation
 
343312365 mt-ppt
343312365 mt-ppt343312365 mt-ppt
343312365 mt-ppt
 
Storage tank inspection presentation
Storage tank inspection presentationStorage tank inspection presentation
Storage tank inspection presentation
 
Asme section ii c new
Asme section ii c newAsme section ii c new
Asme section ii c new
 
API 570 B31.3 qustion.pdf
API 570 B31.3 qustion.pdfAPI 570 B31.3 qustion.pdf
API 570 B31.3 qustion.pdf
 
ASME SEC IX PPT.pdf
ASME SEC IX PPT.pdfASME SEC IX PPT.pdf
ASME SEC IX PPT.pdf
 
143137557 storage-tanks
143137557 storage-tanks143137557 storage-tanks
143137557 storage-tanks
 
Ffs assessment
Ffs assessmentFfs assessment
Ffs assessment
 
Api 650 & 653 questions closed book with answers
Api 650 & 653 questions closed book with answersApi 650 & 653 questions closed book with answers
Api 650 & 653 questions closed book with answers
 
How to Qualify a Welding Procedure
How to Qualify a Welding ProcedureHow to Qualify a Welding Procedure
How to Qualify a Welding Procedure
 
Inspection of-pressure-vessels
Inspection of-pressure-vesselsInspection of-pressure-vessels
Inspection of-pressure-vessels
 
API 570 open book.pdf
API 570 open book.pdfAPI 570 open book.pdf
API 570 open book.pdf
 
Asme b31,pressure piping code
Asme b31,pressure piping codeAsme b31,pressure piping code
Asme b31,pressure piping code
 
Piping material-specification
Piping material-specificationPiping material-specification
Piping material-specification
 
Presentation on wpqr wps asme_ix
Presentation on wpqr wps asme_ixPresentation on wpqr wps asme_ix
Presentation on wpqr wps asme_ix
 
Api 510-closed-2
Api 510-closed-2Api 510-closed-2
Api 510-closed-2
 
Cswip welding inspection notes and questions
Cswip welding inspection notes and questionsCswip welding inspection notes and questions
Cswip welding inspection notes and questions
 
OCS Training - API 570 piping inspection course
OCS Training - API 570 piping inspection courseOCS Training - API 570 piping inspection course
OCS Training - API 570 piping inspection course
 
Api 570 course material
Api 570 course materialApi 570 course material
Api 570 course material
 
Api 5 l 44 ed psl 1 & psl 2
Api 5 l 44 ed psl 1 & psl 2Api 5 l 44 ed psl 1 & psl 2
Api 5 l 44 ed psl 1 & psl 2
 

Viewers also liked

NDT for Boilers
NDT for BoilersNDT for Boilers
NDT for Boilers
Hemanth Krishnan R
 
BV Certificate 1 (shop inspection technique)
BV Certificate 1 (shop inspection technique)BV Certificate 1 (shop inspection technique)
BV Certificate 1 (shop inspection technique)
Tarique Anwer
 
Jogging
JoggingJogging
Jogging
Cathy Woods
 
Asme pcc 2 repair leaks
Asme pcc 2 repair leaksAsme pcc 2 repair leaks
Asme pcc 2 repair leaks
Greg Kilaton
 
3.LIQUID PENETRANT TESTING
3.LIQUID PENETRANT TESTING3.LIQUID PENETRANT TESTING
3.LIQUID PENETRANT TESTING
Clephen Dsouza
 
Presentation on Technique of Engin Inspection(1)
Presentation on Technique of Engin Inspection(1)Presentation on Technique of Engin Inspection(1)
Presentation on Technique of Engin Inspection(1)
Ferdous Kabir
 
LIQUID PENETRANT INSPECTION
LIQUID PENETRANT INSPECTIONLIQUID PENETRANT INSPECTION
LIQUID PENETRANT INSPECTION
saravana kumar
 
LIQUID PENETRANT AND MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION
LIQUID PENETRANT AND MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTIONLIQUID PENETRANT AND MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION
LIQUID PENETRANT AND MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION
Sai Malleswar
 
Forms of corrosion
Forms of corrosionForms of corrosion
Forms of corrosion
Prof. T. K. G. Namboodhiri
 
Rate of Corrosion And Types of Corrosion
Rate of Corrosion And Types of CorrosionRate of Corrosion And Types of Corrosion
Rate of Corrosion And Types of Corrosion
realistic_friend
 
Chris brooks storage tanks inspection, maintenance and failure
Chris brooks   storage tanks inspection, maintenance and failureChris brooks   storage tanks inspection, maintenance and failure
Chris brooks storage tanks inspection, maintenance and failure
Sreekumar K S
 
Yamaha Motorcycles
Yamaha MotorcyclesYamaha Motorcycles
Yamaha Motorcycles
Jose Sebastian
 
Tank design - powerpoint slides
Tank design - powerpoint slidesTank design - powerpoint slides
Tank design - powerpoint slides
moamen mohamed
 
Types of corrosions
Types of corrosionsTypes of corrosions
Types of corrosions
Amar Ilindra
 
Api 510 study questions
Api 510 study questionsApi 510 study questions
Corrosion monitoring in petroleum refineries
Corrosion monitoring in petroleum refineriesCorrosion monitoring in petroleum refineries
Corrosion monitoring in petroleum refineries
K R SONI
 
Corrosion.ppt
Corrosion.pptCorrosion.ppt
Corrosion.ppt
Darsh Kanjiya
 

Viewers also liked (17)

NDT for Boilers
NDT for BoilersNDT for Boilers
NDT for Boilers
 
BV Certificate 1 (shop inspection technique)
BV Certificate 1 (shop inspection technique)BV Certificate 1 (shop inspection technique)
BV Certificate 1 (shop inspection technique)
 
Jogging
JoggingJogging
Jogging
 
Asme pcc 2 repair leaks
Asme pcc 2 repair leaksAsme pcc 2 repair leaks
Asme pcc 2 repair leaks
 
3.LIQUID PENETRANT TESTING
3.LIQUID PENETRANT TESTING3.LIQUID PENETRANT TESTING
3.LIQUID PENETRANT TESTING
 
Presentation on Technique of Engin Inspection(1)
Presentation on Technique of Engin Inspection(1)Presentation on Technique of Engin Inspection(1)
Presentation on Technique of Engin Inspection(1)
 
LIQUID PENETRANT INSPECTION
LIQUID PENETRANT INSPECTIONLIQUID PENETRANT INSPECTION
LIQUID PENETRANT INSPECTION
 
LIQUID PENETRANT AND MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION
LIQUID PENETRANT AND MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTIONLIQUID PENETRANT AND MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION
LIQUID PENETRANT AND MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION
 
Forms of corrosion
Forms of corrosionForms of corrosion
Forms of corrosion
 
Rate of Corrosion And Types of Corrosion
Rate of Corrosion And Types of CorrosionRate of Corrosion And Types of Corrosion
Rate of Corrosion And Types of Corrosion
 
Chris brooks storage tanks inspection, maintenance and failure
Chris brooks   storage tanks inspection, maintenance and failureChris brooks   storage tanks inspection, maintenance and failure
Chris brooks storage tanks inspection, maintenance and failure
 
Yamaha Motorcycles
Yamaha MotorcyclesYamaha Motorcycles
Yamaha Motorcycles
 
Tank design - powerpoint slides
Tank design - powerpoint slidesTank design - powerpoint slides
Tank design - powerpoint slides
 
Types of corrosions
Types of corrosionsTypes of corrosions
Types of corrosions
 
Api 510 study questions
Api 510 study questionsApi 510 study questions
Api 510 study questions
 
Corrosion monitoring in petroleum refineries
Corrosion monitoring in petroleum refineriesCorrosion monitoring in petroleum refineries
Corrosion monitoring in petroleum refineries
 
Corrosion.ppt
Corrosion.pptCorrosion.ppt
Corrosion.ppt
 

Similar to Lesson 11 corrosion new2

Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000
Vikas Mehta
 
SOM.PDF
SOM.PDFSOM.PDF
SOM.PDF
ssusere48b33
 
Hybrid fibre concrete PPT-1.pptx
Hybrid fibre concrete  PPT-1.pptxHybrid fibre concrete  PPT-1.pptx
Hybrid fibre concrete PPT-1.pptx
ssuserbdc52c
 
Edge effect in high speed slurry erosion wear tests of steels and elastomers
Edge effect in high speed slurry erosion wear tests of steels and elastomersEdge effect in high speed slurry erosion wear tests of steels and elastomers
Edge effect in high speed slurry erosion wear tests of steels and elastomers
Niko Ojala
 
Self compacting concrete mix
Self compacting concrete mixSelf compacting concrete mix
Self compacting concrete mix
Suresh Varma Kopanathi
 
Los Angeles Abrasion Test.pptx
Los Angeles Abrasion Test.pptxLos Angeles Abrasion Test.pptx
Los Angeles Abrasion Test.pptx
NUR
 
Presentation: Comparative Evaluation Of Epoxy Treated Reinforcement And Ename...
Presentation: Comparative Evaluation Of Epoxy Treated Reinforcement And Ename...Presentation: Comparative Evaluation Of Epoxy Treated Reinforcement And Ename...
Presentation: Comparative Evaluation Of Epoxy Treated Reinforcement And Ename...
IEI GSC
 
Lecture 04
Lecture 04Lecture 04
Lecture 04
luyenkimnet
 
Corrosion Measursement, Friction testing and XRD Analysis of Single Layer CrN...
Corrosion Measursement, Friction testing and XRD Analysis of Single Layer CrN...Corrosion Measursement, Friction testing and XRD Analysis of Single Layer CrN...
Corrosion Measursement, Friction testing and XRD Analysis of Single Layer CrN...
IJAEMSJORNAL
 
Study on the Analysis of Chromite Refractory Brick from Mwe Taung Chromite Ore
Study on the Analysis of Chromite Refractory Brick from Mwe Taung Chromite OreStudy on the Analysis of Chromite Refractory Brick from Mwe Taung Chromite Ore
Study on the Analysis of Chromite Refractory Brick from Mwe Taung Chromite Ore
ijtsrd
 
Project2Report.docx
Project2Report.docxProject2Report.docx
Project2Report.docx
Siddhesh Sawant
 
1.2_Basic Engineering_Day 4.pptx
1.2_Basic Engineering_Day 4.pptx1.2_Basic Engineering_Day 4.pptx
1.2_Basic Engineering_Day 4.pptx
Janak82
 
Specification on prestressing strand
Specification on prestressing strandSpecification on prestressing strand
Specification on prestressing strand
NimeshPoddar
 
Ahmed ibrahim razooqi...corrosion conduct of austenitic stainless steel 316 l...
Ahmed ibrahim razooqi...corrosion conduct of austenitic stainless steel 316 l...Ahmed ibrahim razooqi...corrosion conduct of austenitic stainless steel 316 l...
Ahmed ibrahim razooqi...corrosion conduct of austenitic stainless steel 316 l...
ahmed Ibrahim
 
Wear and Corrosion Study of Sputtered Zirconium thin films on SS316L for Wind...
Wear and Corrosion Study of Sputtered Zirconium thin films on SS316L for Wind...Wear and Corrosion Study of Sputtered Zirconium thin films on SS316L for Wind...
Wear and Corrosion Study of Sputtered Zirconium thin films on SS316L for Wind...
IJERA Editor
 
PPT.pptx
PPT.pptxPPT.pptx
PPT.pptx
AabalSylo
 
Comparison of Fatigue Characteristic for AISI 1039 Steel with Surface Treatment
Comparison of Fatigue Characteristic for AISI 1039 Steel with Surface TreatmentComparison of Fatigue Characteristic for AISI 1039 Steel with Surface Treatment
Comparison of Fatigue Characteristic for AISI 1039 Steel with Surface Treatment
ijceronline
 
Taguchi analysis of single layer CrN coatings on AISI 304 Stainless Steel to ...
Taguchi analysis of single layer CrN coatings on AISI 304 Stainless Steel to ...Taguchi analysis of single layer CrN coatings on AISI 304 Stainless Steel to ...
Taguchi analysis of single layer CrN coatings on AISI 304 Stainless Steel to ...
IJAEMSJORNAL
 
Master Thesis Presentaion
Master Thesis Presentaion Master Thesis Presentaion
Master Thesis Presentaion
Ranganath Nagaraju
 
Report on Hardness test
Report on Hardness testReport on Hardness test
Report on Hardness test
Marwan Shehata
 

Similar to Lesson 11 corrosion new2 (20)

Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000
 
SOM.PDF
SOM.PDFSOM.PDF
SOM.PDF
 
Hybrid fibre concrete PPT-1.pptx
Hybrid fibre concrete  PPT-1.pptxHybrid fibre concrete  PPT-1.pptx
Hybrid fibre concrete PPT-1.pptx
 
Edge effect in high speed slurry erosion wear tests of steels and elastomers
Edge effect in high speed slurry erosion wear tests of steels and elastomersEdge effect in high speed slurry erosion wear tests of steels and elastomers
Edge effect in high speed slurry erosion wear tests of steels and elastomers
 
Self compacting concrete mix
Self compacting concrete mixSelf compacting concrete mix
Self compacting concrete mix
 
Los Angeles Abrasion Test.pptx
Los Angeles Abrasion Test.pptxLos Angeles Abrasion Test.pptx
Los Angeles Abrasion Test.pptx
 
Presentation: Comparative Evaluation Of Epoxy Treated Reinforcement And Ename...
Presentation: Comparative Evaluation Of Epoxy Treated Reinforcement And Ename...Presentation: Comparative Evaluation Of Epoxy Treated Reinforcement And Ename...
Presentation: Comparative Evaluation Of Epoxy Treated Reinforcement And Ename...
 
Lecture 04
Lecture 04Lecture 04
Lecture 04
 
Corrosion Measursement, Friction testing and XRD Analysis of Single Layer CrN...
Corrosion Measursement, Friction testing and XRD Analysis of Single Layer CrN...Corrosion Measursement, Friction testing and XRD Analysis of Single Layer CrN...
Corrosion Measursement, Friction testing and XRD Analysis of Single Layer CrN...
 
Study on the Analysis of Chromite Refractory Brick from Mwe Taung Chromite Ore
Study on the Analysis of Chromite Refractory Brick from Mwe Taung Chromite OreStudy on the Analysis of Chromite Refractory Brick from Mwe Taung Chromite Ore
Study on the Analysis of Chromite Refractory Brick from Mwe Taung Chromite Ore
 
Project2Report.docx
Project2Report.docxProject2Report.docx
Project2Report.docx
 
1.2_Basic Engineering_Day 4.pptx
1.2_Basic Engineering_Day 4.pptx1.2_Basic Engineering_Day 4.pptx
1.2_Basic Engineering_Day 4.pptx
 
Specification on prestressing strand
Specification on prestressing strandSpecification on prestressing strand
Specification on prestressing strand
 
Ahmed ibrahim razooqi...corrosion conduct of austenitic stainless steel 316 l...
Ahmed ibrahim razooqi...corrosion conduct of austenitic stainless steel 316 l...Ahmed ibrahim razooqi...corrosion conduct of austenitic stainless steel 316 l...
Ahmed ibrahim razooqi...corrosion conduct of austenitic stainless steel 316 l...
 
Wear and Corrosion Study of Sputtered Zirconium thin films on SS316L for Wind...
Wear and Corrosion Study of Sputtered Zirconium thin films on SS316L for Wind...Wear and Corrosion Study of Sputtered Zirconium thin films on SS316L for Wind...
Wear and Corrosion Study of Sputtered Zirconium thin films on SS316L for Wind...
 
PPT.pptx
PPT.pptxPPT.pptx
PPT.pptx
 
Comparison of Fatigue Characteristic for AISI 1039 Steel with Surface Treatment
Comparison of Fatigue Characteristic for AISI 1039 Steel with Surface TreatmentComparison of Fatigue Characteristic for AISI 1039 Steel with Surface Treatment
Comparison of Fatigue Characteristic for AISI 1039 Steel with Surface Treatment
 
Taguchi analysis of single layer CrN coatings on AISI 304 Stainless Steel to ...
Taguchi analysis of single layer CrN coatings on AISI 304 Stainless Steel to ...Taguchi analysis of single layer CrN coatings on AISI 304 Stainless Steel to ...
Taguchi analysis of single layer CrN coatings on AISI 304 Stainless Steel to ...
 
Master Thesis Presentaion
Master Thesis Presentaion Master Thesis Presentaion
Master Thesis Presentaion
 
Report on Hardness test
Report on Hardness testReport on Hardness test
Report on Hardness test
 

Recently uploaded

New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdfNew techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
wisnuprabawa3
 
Eric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball play
Eric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball playEric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball play
Eric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball play
enizeyimana36
 
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
IJECEIAES
 
Engine Lubrication performance System.pdf
Engine Lubrication performance System.pdfEngine Lubrication performance System.pdf
Engine Lubrication performance System.pdf
mamamaam477
 
Heat Resistant Concrete Presentation ppt
Heat Resistant Concrete Presentation pptHeat Resistant Concrete Presentation ppt
Heat Resistant Concrete Presentation ppt
mamunhossenbd75
 
Textile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdf
Textile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdfTextile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdf
Textile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdf
NazakatAliKhoso2
 
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMSA SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
IJNSA Journal
 
TIME DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUE FOR COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
TIME DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUE FOR COMMUNICATION SYSTEMTIME DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUE FOR COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
TIME DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUE FOR COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
HODECEDSIET
 
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part IIIRecycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Aditya Rajan Patra
 
22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt
22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt
22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt
KrishnaveniKrishnara1
 
BPV-GUI-01-Guide-for-ASME-Review-Teams-(General)-10-10-2023.pdf
BPV-GUI-01-Guide-for-ASME-Review-Teams-(General)-10-10-2023.pdfBPV-GUI-01-Guide-for-ASME-Review-Teams-(General)-10-10-2023.pdf
BPV-GUI-01-Guide-for-ASME-Review-Teams-(General)-10-10-2023.pdf
MIGUELANGEL966976
 
IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student Member
IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student MemberIEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student Member
IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student Member
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ
 
International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...
International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...
International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...
gerogepatton
 
Redefining brain tumor segmentation: a cutting-edge convolutional neural netw...
Redefining brain tumor segmentation: a cutting-edge convolutional neural netw...Redefining brain tumor segmentation: a cutting-edge convolutional neural netw...
Redefining brain tumor segmentation: a cutting-edge convolutional neural netw...
IJECEIAES
 
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
ihlasbinance2003
 
132/33KV substation case study Presentation
132/33KV substation case study Presentation132/33KV substation case study Presentation
132/33KV substation case study Presentation
kandramariana6
 
Computational Engineering IITH Presentation
Computational Engineering IITH PresentationComputational Engineering IITH Presentation
Computational Engineering IITH Presentation
co23btech11018
 
basic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdf
basic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdfbasic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdf
basic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdf
NidhalKahouli2
 
学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样
学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样
学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样
171ticu
 
A review on techniques and modelling methodologies used for checking electrom...
A review on techniques and modelling methodologies used for checking electrom...A review on techniques and modelling methodologies used for checking electrom...
A review on techniques and modelling methodologies used for checking electrom...
nooriasukmaningtyas
 

Recently uploaded (20)

New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdfNew techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
New techniques for characterising damage in rock slopes.pdf
 
Eric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball play
Eric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball playEric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball play
Eric Nizeyimana's document 2006 from gicumbi to ttc nyamata handball play
 
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
Advanced control scheme of doubly fed induction generator for wind turbine us...
 
Engine Lubrication performance System.pdf
Engine Lubrication performance System.pdfEngine Lubrication performance System.pdf
Engine Lubrication performance System.pdf
 
Heat Resistant Concrete Presentation ppt
Heat Resistant Concrete Presentation pptHeat Resistant Concrete Presentation ppt
Heat Resistant Concrete Presentation ppt
 
Textile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdf
Textile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdfTextile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdf
Textile Chemical Processing and Dyeing.pdf
 
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMSA SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH FOR SECURING THE SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
 
TIME DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUE FOR COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
TIME DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUE FOR COMMUNICATION SYSTEMTIME DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUE FOR COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
TIME DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUE FOR COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part IIIRecycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
Recycled Concrete Aggregate in Construction Part III
 
22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt
22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt
22CYT12-Unit-V-E Waste and its Management.ppt
 
BPV-GUI-01-Guide-for-ASME-Review-Teams-(General)-10-10-2023.pdf
BPV-GUI-01-Guide-for-ASME-Review-Teams-(General)-10-10-2023.pdfBPV-GUI-01-Guide-for-ASME-Review-Teams-(General)-10-10-2023.pdf
BPV-GUI-01-Guide-for-ASME-Review-Teams-(General)-10-10-2023.pdf
 
IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student Member
IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student MemberIEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student Member
IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Society as a Graduate Student Member
 
International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...
International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...
International Conference on NLP, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning an...
 
Redefining brain tumor segmentation: a cutting-edge convolutional neural netw...
Redefining brain tumor segmentation: a cutting-edge convolutional neural netw...Redefining brain tumor segmentation: a cutting-edge convolutional neural netw...
Redefining brain tumor segmentation: a cutting-edge convolutional neural netw...
 
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
5214-1693458878915-Unit 6 2023 to 2024 academic year assignment (AutoRecovere...
 
132/33KV substation case study Presentation
132/33KV substation case study Presentation132/33KV substation case study Presentation
132/33KV substation case study Presentation
 
Computational Engineering IITH Presentation
Computational Engineering IITH PresentationComputational Engineering IITH Presentation
Computational Engineering IITH Presentation
 
basic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdf
basic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdfbasic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdf
basic-wireline-operations-course-mahmoud-f-radwan.pdf
 
学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样
学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样
学校原版美国波士顿大学毕业证学历学位证书原版一模一样
 
A review on techniques and modelling methodologies used for checking electrom...
A review on techniques and modelling methodologies used for checking electrom...A review on techniques and modelling methodologies used for checking electrom...
A review on techniques and modelling methodologies used for checking electrom...
 

Lesson 11 corrosion new2

  • 1. API 510 Preparatory ClassAPI 510 Preparatory Class Lesson 11Lesson 11 Corrosion CalculationsCorrosion Calculations
  • 2. A 60 foot tower consisting of four (4) shell courses was found to have varying corrosion rates in each course. Minimum wall thickness readings were taken after 4 years and 6 months of service. All original wall thicknesses included a 1/8" corrosion allowance. The top course's original thickness was .3125". The present thickness is .3000". The second course downward had an original thickness of .375". During the inspection it was found to have a minimum wall thickness of .349". The third course was measured at .440" its original thickness was .500". The bottom course had an original thickness of .625" and measured to be .595". Corrosion Example Problems
  • 3. Determine the metal loss for the top course, the corrosion rate for the second course, the corrosion allowance remaining in the third course, the retirement date for the bottom course. Corrosion Example Problems
  • 4. Solution A: TOP COURSE: Metal loss equals the previous thickness minus the present thickness. Previous .3125" Present -.3000" .0125" Metal Loss Corrosion Example Problems
  • 5. SECOND COURSE: Corrosion rate equals metal loss per given unit of time. Previous .3750“ Present - .3490" .0260" Metal Loss = = .006"/ Per Year Corrosion Example Problems yearsTime Loss 5.4 "0260.
  • 6. THIRD COURSE: Remaining Corrosion Allowance equals the actual thickness minus the required thickness. Original Thickness .500" Original C. A. -.125" Required Wall Thickness .375" Actual Wall Thickness .440" Required Wall -.375" Remaining C.A. .065“ Corrosion Example Problems
  • 7. BOTTOM COURSE Remaining life equals the remaining corrosion allowance divided by the corrosion rate. 1. Required Thickness Original Thickness .625" Original C. A. -.125" Required Thickness .500“ Corrosion Example Problems
  • 8. 2.Remaining Corrosion Allowance Actual Wall Thickness .595“ Required Thickness -.500" Remaining Corr. Allow .095“ 3.Corrosion Rate Original Thickness .625" Present Thickness -.595“ Metal Loss .030" Metal Loss .030“ = Corrosion Rate = .0067"/Yr. Time 4.5 Years Corrosion Example Problems
  • 9. 4. Remaining Life Corrosion Allowance.095“ = 14.2 Yrs. Remaining Life Corrosion Rate .0067"/Yr. Corrosion Example Problems
  • 10. Corrosion Just Milling Around In the previous examples we calculated using decimal fractions of an inch such as .006”. However questions on the exam often have the format of Mils or thousandths of and inch. So if you are not familiar with this terminology here are some examples. .1 = 1/10th of an inch .01 = 1/100th of an inch .001 = 1/1000th of an inch or 1 Mil.  this is what is used. Take our example above .006” this translates to 6 Mils. .0067” translates to 6.7 Mils.
  • 11. Class Quiz # 24 Just Milling Around 1. Convert the following decimal fractions into Mils. .195” = _____ Mils . 023” = _____ Mils .009” = _____ Mils. .0011” =______Mils. 2. Convert our previous Remaining Life problem into Mils. Corrosion Allowance .095“ = 14.2 Yrs. Remaining Life Corrosion Rate .0067"
  • 12. Solution Just Milling Around Converting the following decimal fractions into Mils. .195” = 195 Mils .023 = 23 Mils .009 = 9 Mils. .0011 = 1.1 Mils. Corrosion Allowance 95 Mils = 14.2 Yrs. Rem. Life Corrosion Rate 6.7“ Mils/Yr.
  • 13. Time A year has 12 parts The next issue is how do you handle the odd months in a year. Its all good when it has been an even number of years. However what about 2 years and 5 months? Five months is 5/12th of a year. 5/12 = .416 years rounded to 3 places. Of course 6 months is then 6/12 or .5 years. Example: Based on 4.416 years and a metal loss of 50 Mils we have; Metal Loss 50 Mils = Corrosion Rate = 11.3 Mils/Yr. Time 4.416 Years
  • 14. Class Quiz # 25 Time 1. A vessel shell course was replaced in October 1st of 1980. The initial or, baseline thickness was .505”. The most recent actual thickness measured was .485” in January 1st 1991. What is the corrosion rate, based in Mils per year in January of 1991.
  • 15. Solution .505(t-initial) - .485(t-actual) = .020” = 20 Mils Oct.1st 1990 – Oct.1st 1980 = 10 years plus November, December of 1990 and January of 1991 so; 10 yrs. 3 Mos. 10 - 3/12th (3/12 = .250) = 10.25 years Therefore; Metal Loss 20 Mils = Corrosion Rate = 1.95 Mils/Yr. Time 10.25 Years
  • 16. Yes, in the API 510 there are, the Long Term and Short Term. Here is the Long Term. From API 510 6.4 page 6-3 The long term (L.T.) corrosion rate shall be calculated from the following formula: Corrosion rate (L.T.) = Can there be two Corrosion Rates? t(actual)andt(inital)between)time(years t(actual)-t(inital)
  • 17. The short term (S.T.) corrosion rate shall be calculated from the following formula:   Corrosion rate (S.T.) = Corrosion Example Problems actualtandprevioustbetween(years)time actualtprevioust -
  • 18. tinitial = the thickness, in inches(millimeters), at the same location as t actual measured at the initial installation or at the commencement of a new corrosion rate environment. tprevious = the thickness, in inches(millimeters), at the same location as t actual measured during a previous inspection. Long-term and short-term corrosion rates should be compared to as part of the data assessment. The authorized inspector, in consultation with a corrosion specialist, shall select the corrosion rate that best reflects the current process. Corrosion Example Problems
  • 19. Example: A vessel shell had a second set of ultrasonic thickness measurements after 1 year of service, the original baseline wall thickness was 0.500”, and the second set revealed that the shell was now at 0.489”. Five years later a third set of wall readings were taken and the shell was measured to be 0.459”. What value should be used in the Remaining Life calculations? Comparing short term to long term corrosion we find the following values. Normally the most aggressive will be used and in this case it will be the Long Term Corrosion Rate. Corrosion Example Problems
  • 20. L.T. = = 6.8 Mils/ year S.T. = = 6 Mils/ year The remaining life of the vessel shall be calculated from the following formula: Remaining life (years) = (6.4) Corrosion Example Problems years6 0.4590.500- years5 0.459-0.489 ratecorrosion requiredt-actualt
  • 21. tactual = the actual minimum thickness, in inches determined at the time of inspection for a given location or component. trequired = the required thickness in inches at the same location or component as the t actual measurement computed by the design formulas (e.g. , pressure and structural) before corrosion allowance and manufacturer’s…. Example: Determine Remaining life of the vessel shell course in the example above. T required thickness of the shell course is 0.388” (known as t minimum). Compare S.T. and L.T. corrosion rates as follows: S.T. rate = 0.006” or 6 Mils a year L.T. rate = 0.0068” or 6.8 Mils a year Corrosion Example Problems
  • 22. Therefore we will use the most aggressive corrosion rate found to be the Long Term Rate. Remaining life (years) What would be the maximum length of time before the next inspection? ANS: ½ the Remaining Life or 10 years whichever is less. Therefore: 17.79/2 = 8.895 years Corrosion Example Problems Yrs Mils Mils 79.17 8.6 121 "0068.0 "121.0 yeara0.0068" 0.338"-0.459" ===
  • 23. What would be the maximum length of time before the next inspection? From: API 510 page 6-2 6.4 Internal An On-Stream Inspection The period between internal or on-stream inspections shall not exceed one half the estimated remaining life of the vessel based on corrosion rate or 10 years, whichever is less. In cases where the remaining safe operating life is estimated to be less than 4 years, the inspection interval may be the full remaining safe operating life up to a maximum of 2 years. ANS: ½ the Remaining Life or 10 years whichever is less. Therefore: 17.79/2 = 8.895 years Corrosion Example Problems
  • 24. (a) (the second a) For a corroded area of considerable size in which the Circumferential Stress Govern, the least thickness along the most critical element of the area may be averaged over a length not exceeding the following: 1. For vessels with the inside diameters less than or equal to 60 inches one half the vessel diameter or 20 inches whichever is less. 2. For vessels with the inside diameters greater than 60 inches one third the vessel diameter or 40 inches whichever is less. Example 5.7 Page 5-3 Corrosion
  • 25. For a corroded area of considerable size in which the Circumferential Stress Govern, the least thickness along the most critical element of the area may be averaged over a length not exceeding the following: 1. For vessels with the inside diameters less than or equal to 60 inches one half the vessel diameter or 20 inches whichever is less. 2. For vessels with the inside diameters greater than 60 inches one third the vessel diameter or 40 inches whichever is less. Corrosion and Minimum Thickness Evaluation 5.7
  • 26. When the area contains an opening the distance on either side of the opening within which the thicknesses are averaged shall not extend beyond the limits of the reinforcement as defined in the ASME Code. Corrosion and Minimum Thickness Evaluation See Fig. UG-37 and refer to reinforcement calculations for determining the extra metal in the shell. For Limits: d ( t – tr ) or 2(t + tn ) ( t – tr ) Use the Larger
  • 27. Widely scattered pits may be ignored as long as the following are true: Corrosion and Minimum Thickness Evaluation 1. The remaining thickness below the pit is greater than one-half the required thickness. (1/2 t required) 1.0” – 0.125” = 0.875” the required thickness Therefore no pit equal to 0.875”/2 = 0.4375” or greater! Pit #3  0.402 < 0.4375” Acceptable.
  • 28. 2. The total area of the pits does not exceed 7 square inches (45 sq. centimeters) within any 8 inch (20 centimeter) diameter circle.   We will assume the pits to be circles and use the formula Pi x Radius Squared to determine the area of each pit. Pit # One 3.141 x (0.170/2) 2 = 0.085 2 = 0.0226 sq. in. Pit # Two 3.141 x (0.330/2) 2 = 0.165 2 = 0.0855 sq. in. Pit # Three 3.141 x (0.250/2) 2 = 0.125 2 = 0.0490 sq. in. Pit # Four 3.141 x (0.377/2) 2 = 0.1185 2 = 0.1116 sq. in. Total: 0.2678 sq. in. less than 7 sq. inches Acceptable! Corrosion and Minimum Thickness Evaluation
  • 29. 3. The sum of their dimensions along any straight line within the circle does not exceed 2 inches Straight line for pits 1-3-4 #1. 0.170” #3. 0.250” #4. 0.377” Total 0.797” < 2 inches Acceptable When the surface at a weld with a joint factor other than 1.0 as well as the surfaces remote from the weld is corroded, an independent calculation using the appropriate weld joint factor must be made to determine if thickness at the weld or remote from the weld governs the allowable working pressure. Corrosion and Minimum Thickness Evaluation
  • 30. For this calculation the surface at a weld includes 1 inch on either side of the weld, (measured from the toe of the weld), or twice the minimum thickness on either side of the weld, whichever is greater. Corrosion and Minimum Thickness Evaluation
  • 31. When measuring the corroded thickness of ellipsoidal and torispherical heads the governing thickness may be as follows: 1. The thickness of the knuckle region with the head rating calculated by the appropriate head formula. 2. The thickness of the central portion of the dished region in which case the dished region may be considered to be a spherical segment whose allowable pressure is calculated by the Code formula for spherical shells. Corrosion and Minimum Thickness Evaluation
  • 32. 3. For calculating the spherical portion using the spherical formula the following applies to find the spherical radius L: a. L = the OD of the Torispherical head b. L = the ID of the shell times 90% for 2 to 1 Ellipsoidal heads See 5.7 second e. Corrosion and Minimum Thickness Evaluation