The document describes a lab experiment comparing the reactions of different metals with hydrochloric acid. Students observed the reactions of zinc, magnesium, copper, and aluminum with HCl of varying concentrations. Zinc and magnesium reacted vigorously while copper did not react at all. The purpose was to model oxidation-reduction reactions and construct equations to summarize the single replacement reactions. Students analyzed the reactions in terms of atoms becoming ions, oxidation states changing, and the energy changes involved. Reactions that produced heat were determined to be exothermic.
Reaction of metals and non metals with water,Introduction to reactivity serie...MeenakshiVachher
This presentation will help you understand reaction of metals and non metals with water ,the reactivity series of metals. For students of class 7th and 8th
Reaction of metals and non metals with water,Introduction to reactivity serie...MeenakshiVachher
This presentation will help you understand reaction of metals and non metals with water ,the reactivity series of metals. For students of class 7th and 8th
The questions of chapter metals and non metals all in one place to access. This question bank make the students useful to prepare for the 10th board exams.
A quick overview regarding redox reactions for grade 10's. There are no ionic equations here, and no oxidation numbers yet. This will be re-uploaded as soon as the chapter is completed.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!SOFTTECHHUB
As the digital landscape continually evolves, operating systems play a critical role in shaping user experiences and productivity. The launch of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 marks a significant milestone, offering a robust alternative to traditional systems such as Windows 11. This article delves into the essence of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, exploring its unique features, advantages, and how it stands as a compelling choice for both casual users and tech enthusiasts.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
Sudheer Mechineni, Head of Application Frameworks, Standard Chartered Bank
Discover how Standard Chartered Bank harnessed the power of Neo4j to transform complex data access challenges into a dynamic, scalable graph database solution. This keynote will cover their journey from initial adoption to deploying a fully automated, enterprise-grade causal cluster, highlighting key strategies for modelling organisational changes and ensuring robust disaster recovery. Learn how these innovations have not only enhanced Standard Chartered Bank’s data infrastructure but also positioned them as pioneers in the banking sector’s adoption of graph technology.
A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...sonjaschweigert1
Rapid and secure feature delivery is a goal across every application team and every branch of the DoD. The Navy’s DevSecOps platform, Party Barge, has achieved:
- Reduction in onboarding time from 5 weeks to 1 day
- Improved developer experience and productivity through actionable findings and reduction of false positives
- Maintenance of superior security standards and inherent policy enforcement with Authorization to Operate (ATO)
Development teams can ship efficiently and ensure applications are cyber ready for Navy Authorizing Officials (AOs). In this webinar, Sigma Defense and Anchore will give attendees a look behind the scenes and demo secure pipeline automation and security artifacts that speed up application ATO and time to production.
We will cover:
- How to remove silos in DevSecOps
- How to build efficient development pipeline roles and component templates
- How to deliver security artifacts that matter for ATO’s (SBOMs, vulnerability reports, and policy evidence)
- How to streamline operations with automated policy checks on container images
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex ProofsAlex Pruden
This paper presents Reef, a system for generating publicly verifiable succinct non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs that a committed document matches or does not match a regular expression. We describe applications such as proving the strength of passwords, the provenance of email despite redactions, the validity of oblivious DNS queries, and the existence of mutations in DNA. Reef supports the Perl Compatible Regular Expression syntax, including wildcards, alternation, ranges, capture groups, Kleene star, negations, and lookarounds. Reef introduces a new type of automata, Skipping Alternating Finite Automata (SAFA), that skips irrelevant parts of a document when producing proofs without undermining soundness, and instantiates SAFA with a lookup argument. Our experimental evaluation confirms that Reef can generate proofs for documents with 32M characters; the proofs are small and cheap to verify (under a second).
Paper: https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/1886
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
In his public lecture, Christian Timmerer provides insights into the fascinating history of video streaming, starting from its humble beginnings before YouTube to the groundbreaking technologies that now dominate platforms like Netflix and ORF ON. Timmerer also presents provocative contributions of his own that have significantly influenced the industry. He concludes by looking at future challenges and invites the audience to join in a discussion.
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...ThomasParaiso2
End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid regressions. In this session, we share our journey building an E2E testing pipeline for GridMate components (LWC and Aura) using Cypress, JSForce, FakerJS…
1. LAB # 5: Metals and Single Replacement Reactions
Purpose: Compare different metals and their reactions with hydrochloric acid.
Construct a model of oxidation and reduction in single replacement reactions.
Pre-lab Questions:
1. Describe the bond that holds together metals. Explain how this allows it to conduct electricity.
Metallic bonds hold the metal atoms in fixed positions. These free moving electrons allow the metal to
conduct electricity. The electrons have a charge and can move.
2. Metals are composed of atoms - explain why the metal and its atoms are not soluble in water.
Metals are composed of atoms with no charge. These atoms with no charge are not attracted to polar
water molecules.
3. Explain why metal ions are soluble- especially in ionic compounds with nitrate.
What happens to the ions in solution? Draw a visual representation.
Metal ions have a positive charge, so they are attracted to water molecules. When ions dissolve, the ions
dissociate – split up – and form ion-dipole attractions to water molecules. The strength of the ionic bond
determines the solubility of the metal in an ionic bond. When nitrate ions are the negative ions, the
compound is always soluble.
4. Is sodium more stable as an atom or an ion? Compare the reaction of sodium atoms (in sodium metal) to
sodium ions (in sodium chloride salt) when they are added to water.
Sodium atoms were added to water in the form of solid sodium. The sodium bursts into flames and
frequently explodes. The sodium ions in sodium chloride (table salt) added to water is quite boring. No
explosions,; it just dissolves. The sodium ion must be more stable. They do not change much and
release energy in the process of becoming more stable.
Results: Data: Adding different metals to Hydrochloric Acid
Metal Observations Ti Tf ∆T
Zinc
Magnesium
Copper
Aluminum
Metal Observations Ti Tf ∆T
Zinc Bubbling- zinc floats and sinks increase
Magnesium Immediate bubbling and piece of Mg gone increase
Copper No reaction No ∆
Aluminum No reaction No ∆
Initial Analysis:
5. Compare the reactions of each metal. Rank the metals from most reactive to least.
Mg Zn Al Cu
reacted immediately react in 1 M reacted in the 6 M never reacted
6. Which reactions were noticeably exothermic? Support with observations.
The zinc, magnesium and aluminum reacted and all felt hot (temperature increased). The increase in
temperature shows an increase in kinetic energy. This kinetic energy must have come from the reaction.
So the reactions are exothermic.
7. In all the reactions, what is one of the visible products? Support with observations.
Bubbles were observed in all the reactions. This shows that a gas was produced. The molecules are far
apart and neither attracted to the water nor each other.
2. 8. What happened to the atoms of the metals when the metals reacted?
Where are they now? Are they still atoms? Explain your thinking.
The metals were composed of atoms – had no charge and were not attracted to polar water. After the
reaction, the metals must be in solution since we no longer see them. They must now have a charge to
be attracted to the water. So the metals must now be ions.
9. Propose a hypothesis about the products of these reactions. What do think happened to the atoms?
Where are they now? What do you think the gas is?
We started with only metals and HCl. The metals that are now in the solution must have formed
positive ions. There must also be negative ions- chloride ions since hydrogen ions are positive. The
hydrogen must have become a gas.
10. Propose a method to capture and identify the products of the reaction.
Demonstration:
Record observations of aluminum in 6.0 M hydrochloric acid.
Analysis of the Reactions:
11. EQUATIONS TO SUMMARIZE THE REACTIONS:
Write a balanced equation to summarize the reaction of the metals that reacted with hydrochloric acid.
Be sure to include the reactants and products and the symbols.
Mg (s) + 2 HCl (aq) MgCl2(aq) + H2(g)
Zn (s) + 2 HCl (aq) ZnCl2(aq) + H2(g)
2 Al (s) + 6 HCl (aq) 2 AlCl3(aq) + 3 H2(g)
12. REACTANTS:
a. Describe the metals- What kind of particles? What charge on the particles?
Compare the number of protons and electrons in atoms. Identify and describe the bond.
Metals are composed of atoms with no charge, so the number of positive protons must equal the
number of negative electrons. The atoms are held in fixed positions by metallic bonds – a sea of free
moving electrons shared by all the atoms.
b. Describe and draw the ions of hydrogen chloride in aqueous solution (hydrochloric acid- an ionic
acid with hydrogen ions in solution). Include the numbers of protons and electrons in each ion.
Acids (inorganic acids) have hydrogen ions and a negative ion. In the case of hydrochloric acid, the
negative ion is chloride. Since hydrochloric acid is a strong acid – the ions completely dissociate in
solution – that is all the HCl splits up into H+ ions and Cl- ions in solution. These ions are
surrounded by water molecules. The hydrogen ions (H+) each have one proton (+1) and no electrons
for a net charge of positive one. The chloride ions (Cl-) each have seventeen proton (+17) and
eighteen electrons (–18) for a net charge of negative one.
13. PRODUCTS:
a. Draw and describe the gas product produced in all of the reactions.
o What kind of bond holds together the atoms?
The two hydrogen atoms have the same pull on the electrons. They share the electrons equally – a
nonpolar covalent bond. Since the electrons spend the same time around each atom, the ends have
no oppositely charge.
o How did the hydrogen ion change? What happened to the electrons?
The hydrogen ions had no electrons. The hydrogen ions have become hydrogen atoms and they are
now sharing a pair of electrons. They did not have any electrons, so they must have gained electrons.
They were reduced.
o Was the hydrogen oxidized or reduced? Write a half-reaction to show the change.
2H+ (aq) + 2e- H2 (g)
3. b. The magnesium atom became an ion of magnesium in the reaction.
o Draw and describe the magnesium ion in solution. What is the charge on the ion?
Magnesium ions in solution have a charge of positive two (+2) and attracted to the water molecules
by ion-dipole attractions.
o How many protons and electrons in the atoms before the reaction?
o How many protons and electrons in the ions after the reaction?
Before After
Mg (s) Mg2+ (aq)
Atoms Ions
12 p 12p
12 e- 10 e-
0 +2
o Did atom gain or lose an electron to become an ion?
Magnesium had 12 electrons and ends with only 10 electrons, so it lost two electrons.
Write half-reaction to show this change. Was the atom oxidized or reduced?
Since magnesium lost electrons, it was oxidized
Mg (s) Mg2+ (aq) + 2e-
need these two electrons to balance both sides
c. The aluminum atom became an ion of aluminum in the reaction.
Answer all the bullets in b. above for the aluminum (except that a drawing and description of the
ions in solution is not necessary since it would be the same as for magnesium).
Before After
Al (s) Al3+ (aq)
Atoms Ions
12 p 13p
12 e- 10 e-
0 +3
OXIDATION HALF-REACTION
Al (s) Al3+ (aq) + 3e-
d. The zinc atom became a +2 ion of zinc in the reaction. Zinc is a transition metal.
Again. Answer all the bullets in b for zinc.
Before After
Zn (s) Zn2+ (aq)
Atoms Ions
30 p 30 p
30 e- 28 e-
0 +2
OXIDATION HALF-REACTION
Zn (s) Zn2+ (aq) + 2e-
e. The copper does not react with hydrochloric acid, what does that suggest about copper?
Copper must be more stable and less reactive than the other metals.
14. ENTHALPY- ENERGY IN REACTIONS: In the reaction of magnesium with hydrochloric acid, the
energy change should have been noticeable.
a. Was energy transferred into or out of the system? Describe your observational evidence.
Energy transferred out of the system. Since temperature increased – the surrounding gained kinetic
energy, which must have come from the reaction.
4. b. Was the reaction endothermic or exothermic? What happened in terms of stability?
Since energy was transferred out, the potential energy decreased, so it became more stable.
c. Did the energy content (PE) increase or decrease? Which has more PE the products or reactants?
Since energy was transferred out, the potential energy decreased. The reactants have more PE.
d. Describe the reactions in terms of the energy added to break bonds and form bonds.
Energy is required to break the bonds between the metal atoms in the solid as well as between the
hydrogen ions and water molecules. In addition, energy is required to pull off the electrons, since the
electrons are attracted to the positive nucleus.
Energy is released as new bonds form. The magnesium ions form ion-dipole attractions to the
water molecules. The electrons pulled off of magnesium form attractions to the nucleus of hydrogen.
The hydrogen atoms form nonpolar covalent bonds between the atoms to form hydrogen molecules.
Since these reactions were exothermic more energy must be released in the formation of the new
attractions than was required to break the old attractions. The net change in energy is negative – or net
transfer of energy is out.
Draw an energy graph to summarize the reaction.
Ein to Eout as
break attractions form
attractions
H Net Δ H
reactants
negative
products
e. Is this reactions favored or not favored based upon the change in enthalpy? Explain
Since the products have less potential energy they are more stable – so this reaction is
favored to occur based upon enthalpy.
15. ENTROPY:
a. What happened to entropy in these reactions? Explain your reasoning.
Zn (s) + 2 HCl (aq) ZnCl2(aq) + H2(g)
In the beginning, we have solid (fixed positions) and solution (free to move).
In the end, we have a gas (free to move and far apart) and solution (free to move).
The disorder increased since the particles have a greater freedom of movement in the end.
With more possible location there is more disorder.
b. Are these reactions favored or not favored based upon the change in entropy? Explain.
Since the disorder increased, the reaction is favored based upon entropy.
So, this is one of those reactions that is favored based upon both enthalpy and entropy.
16. ATOMS COMPARED TO IONS. Differentiate between atoms and ions. Compare magnesium as an
ion with magnesium as an atom. What is different? What is the same? Are the atoms soluble? Are the
ions soluble? Which is more stable?
17. REACTION RATES.
a. Use a collision model to explain why the aluminum reacted faster with the more concentrated
hydrochloric acid.
See end of document for graphic showing different concentrations.
In these reactions hydrogen ions in solution collide with the metals atoms.
NET IONIC EQUATION H+ (aq) + Al (s) Al3+ (aq) + H2 (g)
REDUCTION HALF-REACTION 2H+ (aq) + 2e- H2 (g)
5. OXIDATION HALF-REACTION Al (s) Al3+ (aq) + 3e-
The hydrogen ions must collide with the aluminum atoms with enough kinetic energy to break the
attractions between atoms as well as the attraction of the negative electrons to the positive nucleus.
If they collide with enough KE, an effective collision occurs and the reaction proceeds as new bonds
form and release energy.
In the more concentrated solution, there are more ions in the same amount of solution. More collisions
will occur between the hydrogen ions in the solution and the metal.
The reaction will be faster.
b. Use a collision model to explain what would happen to the rate of reaction of zinc with hydrochloric
acid if the temperature of the acid were decreased.
Decreasing the temperature decreases the average kinetic energy per particle.
With less KE the particles will collide less often and with less KE.
Thus less collisions will be effective per second and the reaction will be slower.
6. Lab #5 Worksheet Name _______________________________ period ____
Predicting the Products of Single Replacement Reactions
Use activity series (Holt textbook page 327) to determine whether the reaction occurs. If the reaction occurs,
predict the products and balance the equation. Use the most common ion when more than one is possible. If the
reaction does not occur, the write NR (no reaction) and explain why.
1. magnesium and calcium chloride
Mg (s) + CaCl2 (aq) NR – Mg less active than Ca so does not replace
2. lead with copper (II) sulfate
Pb (s) + 2 CuSO4 (aq) Pb(SO4)2 (s) + 2 Cu (s)
3. aluminum with barium nitrate
Al (s) + Ba(NO3)2 (aq) N.R.
4. zinc carbonate with sodium
2 Na (s) + ZnCO3 (aq) Na2CO3 (aq) + Zn (s)
5. lithium with sodium chloride
Li (s) + NaCl (aq) LiCl(aq) + Na (s)
6. magnesium iodide with potassium
MgI2 (aq) + 2 K (s) 2 KI(aq) + Mg (s)
7. hydrochloric acid with silver
HCl (aq) + Ag (s) NR
8. tin (IV) chloride with strontium
2 Sr (s) + SnCl4 (aq) Sn(aq) + 2 SrCl2 (aq)
9. zinc with copper (II) nitrate
Zn (s) + Cu(NO3)2 (aq) Zn(NO3)2 (aq) + Cu(s)
10. lead with magnesium sulfate
Pb (s) + MgSO4 (aq) NR
11. Sacrifical anodes are often used to protect a metal. The Alaskan pipeline is protected by a zinc cable that
rusts alongside it. Which metal will be oxidized first (which is more active and will therefore react first)?
12. Galvanized iron nails are coated with zinc. How does this protect the nail from rusting?
13. Select and defend a metal that might be used to protect tin cans from oxidizing.
7. 1.0 M H+ 3.0 M H+
Same volume
More ions
So – more concentrated