TESOL France presentation (Whyte & Siddiqa, 2016)
Interlanguage pragmatics is considered one of the major communicative skills. However it has been rarely a focus in traditional classrooms that focus on lexico-grammatical functions, and second language (L2) speakers often fail to approximate native-like norms. The present study focused on supporting EFL teachers in the teaching of interlanguage pragmatics in secondary schools, with a particular emphasis on requests.
MEd: EAL pupils and classroom teachers' attitudes to class withdrawal vs main...Kamil Trzebiatowski
ABSTRACT
In the 1980s, the teaching of English to EAL (English as an Additional Language) learners in England moved from the provision of separate programmes to providing language support in mainstream settings. Both The Swann Report (1985) and The Calderdale Report (1986) considered teaching EAL students away from schools as racial segregation. Nowadays, the English government policy in England expects EAL learners to be included in the mainstream as quickly as possible, requiring subject teachers to teach both language and content in their classes. However, many schools still provide some withdrawal-based support to EAL learners, seeing such an approach as the most practical. Whilst, over the years, there have been numerous research papers debating the advantages and drawbacks of EAL withdrawal and mainstreaming, this debate has almost never included EAL children’s opinions themselves.
This dissertation reports on a small-scale study conducted at a secondary school in north-east England into the opinions held by new-to-English EAL pupils and mainstream teachers on whether or not such pupils should be mainstreamed or withdrawn for English language lessons, investigating whether these opinions are aligned or divergent. 5 EAL pupils and 5 mainstream teachers were interviewed for this study. Were EAL pupils’ and their teachers’ views very different, an assertion could be made that schools do not serve this group very well and act directly against their needs – perhaps due to political, historical and social processes. Taking into consideration factors likely to influence the opinions held by the two parties, this dissertation presents its findings, conclusions and recommendations for the future.
MEd: EAL pupils and classroom teachers' attitudes to class withdrawal vs main...Kamil Trzebiatowski
ABSTRACT
In the 1980s, the teaching of English to EAL (English as an Additional Language) learners in England moved from the provision of separate programmes to providing language support in mainstream settings. Both The Swann Report (1985) and The Calderdale Report (1986) considered teaching EAL students away from schools as racial segregation. Nowadays, the English government policy in England expects EAL learners to be included in the mainstream as quickly as possible, requiring subject teachers to teach both language and content in their classes. However, many schools still provide some withdrawal-based support to EAL learners, seeing such an approach as the most practical. Whilst, over the years, there have been numerous research papers debating the advantages and drawbacks of EAL withdrawal and mainstreaming, this debate has almost never included EAL children’s opinions themselves.
This dissertation reports on a small-scale study conducted at a secondary school in north-east England into the opinions held by new-to-English EAL pupils and mainstream teachers on whether or not such pupils should be mainstreamed or withdrawn for English language lessons, investigating whether these opinions are aligned or divergent. 5 EAL pupils and 5 mainstream teachers were interviewed for this study. Were EAL pupils’ and their teachers’ views very different, an assertion could be made that schools do not serve this group very well and act directly against their needs – perhaps due to political, historical and social processes. Taking into consideration factors likely to influence the opinions held by the two parties, this dissertation presents its findings, conclusions and recommendations for the future.
Inherent power structures across departments and (mutual) ignorance are barriers to collaboration - and thus barriers to language curriculum renewal and teaching that meets learner needs. Through a narrative account of our own experience, we reflect in this talk on the highly productive inter-knowingness that has emerged and evolved between the English Language Centre and academic departments at Durham University. We relate how professional image management and the development of our own 'plausibility' among academic staff has led to a change in relationship, from 'working for' to 'working with'. Most importantly, we examine how this evolution has benefitted the student language learning experience.
Covered the lesson plan framework I've developed for EAL lessons/teaching, incorporating both the principles of Talk to Writing principles (P.Gibbons) and B.Mohan's Knowledge Framework. Practical examples from my lessons were given
PPP to TBL Different approaches to language presentationJo Gakonga
What is PPP? TTT? TBL? What are the differences between them? What are the advantages and drawbacks of each of these methods of language presentation? This slideshow explores these issues. For a free, voiced over presentation of this, go to elt-training.com
Competently Brought to Life - Bringing The Competency Framework for EAP Teach...Steve Kirk
This was a workshop delivered at 'The Janus Moment', BALEAP Biennial Conference (20 April 2013), together with colleagues from the Universities of Glasgow and Reading. We looked at ways of bringing alive the Competency Framework for EAP Teachers (CFTEAP) for teacher development.
Session Summary:
Putting theory and research into practice is a challenge in any context. Doing it in a way that is transferable to a variety of contexts provides an even greater level of challenge. It could be argued that this situation applies to the Competency Framework for Teachers of English for Academic Purposes (CFTEAP), published in 2008.
After three years of development the framework has gone on to provide excellent guidance for the professional development of teachers, and those responsible for training them. However, there is further scope to make the framework a practical resource for both teachers and teacher trainers. This practical workshop will look at concrete examples of materials that enact certain CFTEAP criteria to help teachers demonstrate their knowledge and progress in EAP. It will also look at materials that can be used by teacher trainers in facilitating the development of others.
The first part of the workshop will take a hands-on look at materials produced to help teachers structure both their study of EAP and development as an EAP practitioner. The materials provide a framework within which teachers can develop their knowledge and skills in a staged and scaffolded way.
The second part will look at a set of materials that have been developed for use by teacher trainers to provide help and guidance to early career professionals.
Finally, reactions and comments will be gathered from the workshop participants in order to feed into the further development and completion of this resource.
A selection of strategies and techniques for the teaching of both EAL and non-EAL learners - cloze and others for focusing students' attention on texts themselves (rather than only meaning)
How a teacher presents information and motivates students to talk in English can seriously decide the efficiency of an English class; therefore, teachers need to explore sufficient approaches to stimulate students to talk. Coaching students to be involved in the process of communication can greatly satisfy individualized English learning. The author here will analyze teaching speaking based on multimodality and put forward some suggestions for English learners and teachers.
EAP Opportunities in Academic Reading - Some Thoughts for TeachersSteve Kirk
This was an EAP staff development session I ran for a UK university EAP unit early in 2013. I was tasked with looking 'beyond comprehension exercises', to look at exploiting texts and tasks for learning that was both linguistically and academically focused. This is what I came up with.
One key aspect of the session looked at teasing apart the difference between co-text and context, and using this distinction to see 'EAP learning opportunities' (for students and teachers) in text, that go beyond the surface words and the grammar.
Inherent power structures across departments and (mutual) ignorance are barriers to collaboration - and thus barriers to language curriculum renewal and teaching that meets learner needs. Through a narrative account of our own experience, we reflect in this talk on the highly productive inter-knowingness that has emerged and evolved between the English Language Centre and academic departments at Durham University. We relate how professional image management and the development of our own 'plausibility' among academic staff has led to a change in relationship, from 'working for' to 'working with'. Most importantly, we examine how this evolution has benefitted the student language learning experience.
Covered the lesson plan framework I've developed for EAL lessons/teaching, incorporating both the principles of Talk to Writing principles (P.Gibbons) and B.Mohan's Knowledge Framework. Practical examples from my lessons were given
PPP to TBL Different approaches to language presentationJo Gakonga
What is PPP? TTT? TBL? What are the differences between them? What are the advantages and drawbacks of each of these methods of language presentation? This slideshow explores these issues. For a free, voiced over presentation of this, go to elt-training.com
Competently Brought to Life - Bringing The Competency Framework for EAP Teach...Steve Kirk
This was a workshop delivered at 'The Janus Moment', BALEAP Biennial Conference (20 April 2013), together with colleagues from the Universities of Glasgow and Reading. We looked at ways of bringing alive the Competency Framework for EAP Teachers (CFTEAP) for teacher development.
Session Summary:
Putting theory and research into practice is a challenge in any context. Doing it in a way that is transferable to a variety of contexts provides an even greater level of challenge. It could be argued that this situation applies to the Competency Framework for Teachers of English for Academic Purposes (CFTEAP), published in 2008.
After three years of development the framework has gone on to provide excellent guidance for the professional development of teachers, and those responsible for training them. However, there is further scope to make the framework a practical resource for both teachers and teacher trainers. This practical workshop will look at concrete examples of materials that enact certain CFTEAP criteria to help teachers demonstrate their knowledge and progress in EAP. It will also look at materials that can be used by teacher trainers in facilitating the development of others.
The first part of the workshop will take a hands-on look at materials produced to help teachers structure both their study of EAP and development as an EAP practitioner. The materials provide a framework within which teachers can develop their knowledge and skills in a staged and scaffolded way.
The second part will look at a set of materials that have been developed for use by teacher trainers to provide help and guidance to early career professionals.
Finally, reactions and comments will be gathered from the workshop participants in order to feed into the further development and completion of this resource.
A selection of strategies and techniques for the teaching of both EAL and non-EAL learners - cloze and others for focusing students' attention on texts themselves (rather than only meaning)
How a teacher presents information and motivates students to talk in English can seriously decide the efficiency of an English class; therefore, teachers need to explore sufficient approaches to stimulate students to talk. Coaching students to be involved in the process of communication can greatly satisfy individualized English learning. The author here will analyze teaching speaking based on multimodality and put forward some suggestions for English learners and teachers.
EAP Opportunities in Academic Reading - Some Thoughts for TeachersSteve Kirk
This was an EAP staff development session I ran for a UK university EAP unit early in 2013. I was tasked with looking 'beyond comprehension exercises', to look at exploiting texts and tasks for learning that was both linguistically and academically focused. This is what I came up with.
One key aspect of the session looked at teasing apart the difference between co-text and context, and using this distinction to see 'EAP learning opportunities' (for students and teachers) in text, that go beyond the surface words and the grammar.
Demystifying Interlanguage Pragmatics for EFL TeachersOmaima Ayoub
This presentation defines Interlanguage Pragmatics (ILP), introduces key relevant concepts, and provides a flexible model of L2 pragmatic instruction that can minimize instances of pragmatic failure in intermediate and advanced learners' L2 production. This model aims to increase learners’ cognitive awareness and enhance their receptive and productive skills. This presentation was delivered on January, 24th 2017 at the NileTESOL 21st International Conference, Cairo, Egypt.
Pragmatics in the EFL classroom: An introductionJerry Talandis
Here are the slides from my presentation at the JALT 2013 national conference, in Kobe, Japan on October 27th. Here's the abstract:
If pragmatic competence is indeed a crucial part of successful communication (Murray, 2009), it follows that language learners need both instruction of pragmatic routines and awareness raising in order to achieve proficiency in a second language (Charlesbois, 2004). The field itself is quite broad, however, encompassing areas such as speech acts, discourse organization, sociolinguistics, and conversational structure, implicature, and management- all areas not traditionally addressed in language teaching curricula (Bardovi-Harlig & Mehan-Taylor, 2003). For English teachers in Japan largely unfamiliar with pragmatics yet interested in learning more, guidance is needed in exploring its many benefits for improving oral communication skills. This workshop will therefore aim to make pragmatics more accessible and practical by defining the field in lay terms, making a case for its inclusion within an oral communication curriculum for low-intermediate and above learners, and providing specific ideas on which aspects to focus upon and how to teach them. Participants will have an opportunity to experience and reflect on various activities that introduce, practice, and assess progress in building pragmatic competency. Space will also be included for participants to discuss their teaching contexts and exchange ideas on how to effectively introduce pragmatics to their students.
References:
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Mehan-Taylor, R. (2009). Teaching pragmatics. English Teaching Forum 2003(41:3).
Charlebois, J. (2004). Pragmatics: The heart and soul of linguistic proficiency. The Language Teacher, 28(4).
Murray, N. (2009). Rethinking pragmatics pragmatics for the classroom: A deductive approach. PAC7 at JALT2008 Conference Proceedings.
Classroom integration of interactive technologies to support learner autonomyShona Whyte
Seminar on Education technologies & Language learner autonomy, LaDiLS (Laboratory of Didactics of Foreign Languages), as part of the Language Teaching Centre at the Department of Linguistics and Comparative Studies of Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. 14 October 2013. http://www.unive.it/nqcontent.cfm?a_id=120390
Also blog post here: http://bit.ly/19VK0T2
ELLiE: a longitudinal transnational study on early language learningETAI 2010
Lucilla Lopriore
This contribution is aimed at presenting some preliminary results of a study of young EFL learners’ attitude to foreign language learning as well as of their language achievements. Longitudinal investigations have been carried out for four years in 7 European countries as part of a transnational research project.
How can I improve the class interaction with my students in English? Jc's act...Juan Reyes Jc
Students love English in the school, they enjoy doing oral presentations about their interests, they like singing or playing games, however, they don’t use English to ask requests, ask for information or express their feelings using this foreign language.
Hypothesis:
Students don’t ask questions in the English class due to the fact that they feel shy to make mistakes in front to the class and also because they don’t have the habit of speaking in the foreign language naturally.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
3. UMR7320 BASES, CORPUS, LANGAGE.
UNIVERSITÉ NICE SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS.
wp.me/p28EmH-yL
LEARNING TO MAKE
REQUESTS IN ENGLISH
The acquisition of politeness
strategies by young EFL learners in
France: An exploratory study of
interlanguage pragmatic development
Doctoral thesis
JM Merle, S Whyte
4. LANGUAGE TEACHER EDUCATION
SECOND LANGUAGE INTERACTION
wp.me/p28EmH-yL
TEACHING ENGLISH AS A
FOREIGN LANGUAGE
Introduction to
classroom EFL research
Master MEEF anglais
Académie de Nice
5. Aims of presentation
Themes: Teacher Training and
Development &Young Adult Learners
Interlanguage pragmatics is
considered one of the major
communicative skills. However it has
been rarely a focus in traditional
classrooms that focus on lexico-
grammatical functions, and second
language (L2) speakers often fail to
approximate native-like norms. The
present study focused on supporting
EFL teachers in the teaching of
interlanguage pragmatics in
secondary schools, with a particular
emphasis on requests.
6. WORKSHOP
OUTLINE 1. BACKGROUND
2. DOCTORAL RESEARCH PROJECT
3. TEACHER EDUCATION COURSE
4. SAMPLE TEACHING MATERIALS
5. FEEDBACK FROM PARTICIPANTS
6. IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING
workshop
activities
7. What is pragmatics?
✤ “how-to-say-what-to-whom-when”
(Bardovi-Harlig, 2013)
✤ “the study of language from the point of view of
users, especially of the choices they make, the
constraints they encounter in using language in social
interaction and the effects their use of language has
on other participants in the act of communication”
(Crystal, 1997)
8. a. in a secondary school class
b. in a lecturer’s office
c. at university
d. in a plane, before take-off
e. in the audience of a school concert
f. in a car park
g. in an office
h. on a footpath
Contexts for requests
1. It’d be cool if you could move up
one.
2. Get us a pie, mate.
3. If you could just grab a copy of that
for a moment.
4. I was wondering if I could have, um,
3 weeks annual leave?
5. Would it be OK if I handed my
assignment in next Monday?
6. Could you just pop that up there for
me?
7. Do you wanna move over ?
Yates, 2008
9. Cross-cultural
(mis)communication
✤ Do you have a bag? Beebe &
Takahashi (1989)
✤ Japanese waiter in New York
sushi bar asked female
American customer if she had
a bag (information question vs
warning, illocutionary force)
✤ study of L2 pragmatics,
interlanguage pragmatic
development
10. Researching L2
pragmatics
1. Are there universals of language
underlying cross-linguistic
variation? If so, do they play a role
in interlanguage pragmatics?
2. How can approximation to target
language norms be measured?
3. Does the L1 influence the learning
of a second language?
4. Is pragmatic development in a
second language similar to first
language learning?
5. Does type of input make a
difference?
6. Does instruction make a difference?
7. Do motivation and attitudes make
a difference?
8. Does personality play a role?
9. Does formulaic speech play a role?
10. What mechanisms drive
development from stage to stage?
–Kasper & Rose, 2002
11. WORKSHOP
OUTLINE 1. BACKGROUND
2. DOCTORAL RESEARCH PROJECT
3. TEACHER EDUCATION COURSE
4. SAMPLE TEACHING MATERIALS
5. FEEDBACK FROM PARTICIPANTS
6. IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING
12. Research study
The use and acquisition of
politeness strategies among EFL
learners in France:
An exploratory study of
interlanguage pragmatic
development
13. What is a request?
A request is a directive speech act whose illocutionary purpose is to get the
hearer to do something in circumstances in which it is not obvious that he/she
will perform the action in the normal course of events (Searle, 1969).
Request
Alerter
Head act Request
perspective
Internal
Modification
Request
Strategy
Supportive
Move
14. Head act: Request Strategies
Direct requests
Conventionally
indirect requests
Non-
conventionally
indirect requests
• Speak up please.
• Repeat please.
• Madam, can I go to the board?
• Can I have a paper please?
• I don’t have the paper.
16. Doctoral research project: Research questions
1.How well are French learners of English able to
formulate requests?
2.Is there any evidence of development over time?
3.What kind of input do the classroom learners get
in France?
4.What opportunities do they have for production?
Do they use these opportunities? Do they
create others?
17. Methodology
Naturalistic + Experimental data
1. Classroom filming
2. Cartoon oral production task
(COPT)
3. Role plays
4. Teacher interviews
5. Textbook analysis
19. • Design of the study
Cross-sectional
• Participants
3 levels of learners
Level Name of
class
School year Approximate
age (years)
1 6eme First year of
middle school
11-12
2 3eme Last year of
middle school
14-15
3 Terminale Last year of
high school
17-18
Methodology
20. Level
Number
of
classes
Hours of class
recorded
(3 hours per
teacher)
Total
number of
learners
Mean
number of
learners
per class
1 5 15 131 26
2 3 9 73 24
3 5 15 104 20
Total 13 39 308
Can I come
to the board
please?
can I have the test
please because I
need the questions
Have you
règle, please?
Participants: Classroom filming
21. Level
Sessions
(N)
Participants
(N)
Age (years)
1 5 107 11-12
2 3 69 14-15
3 5 67 17-18
Total 13 243
Can you give
me one
paper?
Excuse me, can I
please borrow a
piece of paper?
Participants: COPT
It's possible: to
have, a paper
for me please?
22. Role play
participants
Level
Participants
(N)
Age (years)
Level 1 18 11-12
Level 2 10 14-15
Level 3 13 17-18
Total 41
§ Participant: #00:00:00-1# Sorry miss I, I was talking
with Arthur and, can you show again the video?
§ Interlocutor:#00:00:06-7# Okay in the normal
situation, yes. This is a test I told you this was a test
and I told you that our time was limited. So I'm
sorry, no. If you can't answer the questions, whose
responsibility is that?
§ Participant#00:00:17-8# It's my respon/
responsibility but, I would like to, to look the video.
§ Interlocutor #00:00:25-1# Yeah I understand…..
23. Development of request strategies
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
COPT
Direct
Conventionally Indirect
Non-conventionally indirect
Request strategy
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Role plays
Direct
Conventionally indirect
Non-conventionally indirect
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Authentic Requests
Direct
Conventionally Indirect
Non-conventionally indirect
Give me
a paper
Can you
give me a
paper?
Do you
have a
paper?
24. Development of modifier use
Request modifications
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
COPT
Alerters
Internal modification
Supportive moves
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
350%
400%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Role plays
Alerters
Lexical downgraders
Supportive moves
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Authentic requests
Alerters
Lexical and phrasal downgrader
Supportive moves
Miss,
excuse
me
Please,
a little
because I
didn’t….,
thank you
25. What our research suggests so far
• Learners make different choices regarding request strategies and
modifiers depending on task type
• in cartoon production and role-plays, learners use a range of
moves and more modifiers
• in naturally occurring classroom contexts, their request behaviour
is more restricted
• Learners do develop in request behaviour over time: older, more
proficient learners are able to make more indirect requests
• BUT the learners’ range of request strategies, modifiers and modals
remains quite limited
what are the implications for teaching pragmatics?
26. WORKSHOP
OUTLINE 1. BACKGROUND
2. DOCTORAL RESEARCH PROJECT
3. TEACHER EDUCATION COURSE
4. SAMPLE TEACHING MATERIALS
5. FEEDBACK FROM PARTICIPANTS
6. IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING
27. Masters in Teaching
English
master MEEF anglais (ESPE Nice)
modules in English studies and education
first year: introduction to classroom research
28. Masters in Teaching
English
master MEEF anglais (ESPE Nice)
M1 => CAPES preparation (university/ESPE)
M2 => part-time teaching (collège-lycée), part-
time study (university/ESPE)
30. Masters in Teaching
English
first year: introduction to classroom research
school placement: observation and supervised
practice (2 x 2 weeks, November and May)
collecting and analysing classroom data
second year: 9h EFL teaching (collège-lycée)
2.5 days’ teacher education
research project + report (mémoire professionnel)
collecting and analysing classroom data
31. Participants
class of fifteen M1 student-teachers
4 student-teachers in 3 classes (stagiaires)
3 mentor teachers (tutrices)
17 learners in 3 focus groups (élèves)
32. Teacher education input
14 hours: school placement, introduction to
classroom research
raising awareness of IL pragmatics
sample teaching activities
data collection procedures
analysing learner language making polite
requests
33. Classroom study
student-teachers
planned and delivered lessons on making
appropriate requests in English
received feedback from school tutors
analysed classroom data
presented findings to peers
teaching
requests
34. Data
3 groups of student-teachers
Jenny, 3ème
Megan, 2nde
Aude & Faiza, 1ère
teaching
requests
35. WORKSHOP
OUTLINE 1. BACKGROUND
2. DOCTORAL RESEARCH PROJECT
3. TEACHER EDUCATION COURSE
4. SAMPLE TEACHING MATERIALS
5. FEEDBACK FROM PARTICIPANTS
6. IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING
36. video extracts
Watch and listen to three
extracts from TV series
Note down any requests
you hear
Compare with neighbour
37. video extracts
Read transcripts as you
watch again
Underline requests
What parts of requests or
strategies can you identify?
How do a) interlocutor status
and b) level of imposition
affect requests?
How are modals used in
requests?
38. Joey: I can't believe what I'm hearing
here.
Phoebe: (sings) I can't believe what
I'm hearing here...
Monica: What? I-I said you had a-
Phoebe: (sings) What I said you had...
Monica: (to Phoebe) Would you stop?
Phoebe: Oh, was I doing it again?
All: Yes!
Monica: I said that you had a nice
butt, it's just not a great butt.
Joey: Oh, you wouldn't know a great
butt if it came up and bit ya.
Ross: There's an image.
Rachel: (walks up with a pot of coffee)
Would anybody like more coffee?
Chandler: Did you make it, or are you
just serving it?
Rachel: I'm just serving it.
All: Yeah. Yeah, I'll have a cup of coffee.
Chandler: Kids, new dream... I'm in Las
Vegas.
Customer: (To Rachel) Ahh, miss?
More coffee?
Rachel: Ugh. (To another customer
that's leaving.) Excuse me, could you
give this to that guy over there? (Hands
him the coffee pot.) Go ahead. (He does
so.) Thank you. (To the gang.) Sorry.
Okay, Las Vegas.
Chandler: Okay, so, I'm in Las Vegas...
I'm Liza Minelli-
39. Joey: I can't believe what I'm hearing
here.
Phoebe: (sings) I can't believe what
I'm hearing here...
Monica: What? I-I said you had a-
Phoebe: (sings) What I said you had...
Monica: (to Phoebe) Would you stop?
Phoebe: Oh, was I doing it again?
All: Yes!
Monica: I said that you had a nice
butt, it's just not a great butt.
Joey: Oh, you wouldn't know a great
butt if it came up and bit ya.
Ross: There's an image.
Rachel: (walks up with a pot of coffee)
Would anybody like more coffee?
Chandler: Did you make it, or are you
just serving it?
Rachel: I'm just serving it.
All: Yeah. Yeah, I'll have a cup of
coffee.
Chandler: Kids, new dream... I'm in Las
Vegas.
Customer: (To Rachel) Ahh, miss?
More coffee?
Rachel: Ugh. (To another customer
that's leaving.) Excuse me, could you
give this to that guy over there?
(Hands him the coffee pot.) Go ahead.
(He does so.) Thank you. (To the
gang.) Sorry. Okay, Las Vegas.
Chandler: Okay, so, I'm in Las Vegas...
I'm Liza Minelli-
40. Jake: Good job.
[indistinct chatter] Thanks. Bye. See you.
Jake: Harry, hey, that was... That was something.
Harry: I never got an A+ before.
Jake: Well, congratulations.
Harry: Can I ask you a question?
Jake: Yeah.
Harry: I'm going for a promotion. Can you write a letter to the
principal?
Jake: Only if you promise to give me a raise as soon as you're running
this place.
Harry: Yeah.
Jake: All right, see you.
41. Jake: Good job.
[indistinct chatter] Thanks. Bye. See you.
Jake: Harry, hey, that was... That was something.
Harry: I never got an A+ before.
Jake: Well, congratulations.
Harry: Can I ask you a question?
Jake: Yeah.
Harry: I'm going for a promotion. Can you write a letter to the
principal?
Jake: Only if you promise to give me a raise as soon as you're running
this place.
Harry: Yeah.
Jake: All right, see you.
42. THOMAS And they're off.
MRS HUGHES No rest for the wicked.
MRS PATMORE Lady Mary. Are the tea trays ready?
ANNA All ready, Mrs Patmore, if the water’s
boiled. Could you give us a hand to
take the other two up?
MISS O'BRIEN I've got Her Ladyship's to carry.
GWEN I'll help.
MRS HUGHES Back door.
--
MR CARSON The papers at last. William.
WILLIAM You're late.
PAPERBOY Yeah. I--I know, but--
WILLIAM But what?
PAPERBOY You'll see.
43. THOMAS And they're off.
MRS HUGHES No rest for the wicked.
MRS PATMORE Lady Mary. Are the tea trays ready?
ANNA All ready, Mrs Patmore, if the water’s
boiled. Could you give us a hand to
take the other two up?
MISS O'BRIEN I've got Her Ladyship's to carry.
GWEN I'll help.
MRS HUGHES Back door.
--
MR CARSON The papers at last. William.
WILLIAM You're late.
PAPERBOY Yeah. I--I know, but--
WILLIAM But what?
PAPERBOY You'll see.
44. MR CARSON Do The Times first. He only reads that at
breakfast, and The Sketch for Her Ladyship. You can
manage the others later if need be.
--
DAISY Why are the papers ironed?
MRS PATMORE What's it to you?
MISS O'BRIEN To dry the ink, silly. We won't want His
Lordship's hands as black as yours.
WILLIAM Mr Carson, I think you ought to see this.
--
MRS HUGHES I can't make myself believe it.
MRS PATMORE Me neither.
THOMAS His Lordship's dressed.
MRS PATMORE William! Will you stop talking and take this
kedgeree up, and mind the burners are still lit.
WILLIAM Yes, Mrs Patmore.
THOMAS Is it really true?
WILLIAM Afraid so.
MRS PATMORE Nothing in life is sure.
45. MR CARSON Do The Times first. He only reads that at
breakfast, and The Sketch for Her Ladyship. You can
manage the others later if need be.
--
DAISY Why are the papers ironed?
MRS PATMORE What's it to you?
MISS O'BRIEN To dry the ink, silly. We won't want His
Lordship's hands as black as yours.
WILLIAM Mr Carson, I think you ought to see this.
--
MRS HUGHES I can't make myself believe it.
MRS PATMORE Me neither.
THOMAS His Lordship's dressed.
MRS PATMORE William! Will you stop talking and take this
kedgeree up, and mind the burners are still lit.
WILLIAM Yes, Mrs Patmore.
THOMAS Is it really true?
WILLIAM Afraid so.
MRS PATMORE Nothing in life is sure.
46. ROBERT, EARL OF GRANTHAM
Is Her Ladyship awake?
MISS O'BRIEN
Yes, Milord. I'm just going to take in her breakfast.
ROBERT, EARL OF GRANTHAM
Thank you.
--
ROBERT, EARL OF GRANTHAM
May I come in?
CORA, COUNTESS OF GRANTHAM
Isn't this terrible?
47. ROBERT, EARL OF GRANTHAM
Is Her Ladyship awake?
MISS O'BRIEN
Yes, Milord. I'm just going to take in her breakfast.
ROBERT, EARL OF GRANTHAM
Thank you.
--
ROBERT, EARL OF GRANTHAM
May I come in?
CORA, COUNTESS OF GRANTHAM
Isn't this terrible?
49. WORKSHOP
OUTLINE 1. BACKGROUND
2. DOCTORAL RESEARCH PROJECT
3. TEACHER EDUCATION COURSE
4. SAMPLE TEACHING MATERIALS
5. FEEDBACK FROM PARTICIPANTS
6. IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING
50. Lesson 1: Structure
Jenny (3ème) : awareness raising
activity 50 minutes
1. watch video extracts of series
Fresh off the Boat with short whole-
class discussion
2. identify requests from transcripts
3. find alternatives to can I/can you
with different interlocutors
4. establish when each expression is
appropriate (explicit sociopragmatic
teaching)
51. Lesson 1: Student teacher
feedback
Choice of videos
Jenny: “I really first I was more
worried about the videos. I knew
my tutor was working on
immigration and I thought about
this TV series about this Asian family
that I watch. So I just played the
first episode and from the start
there were requests so I was just
“Oh yes, I can just take some
parts and make them watch it and
see how it goes.”
52. Lesson 1: Student teacher
feedback
Unexpected lack of response
Jenny: I don’t know why, I mean when I showed them
the video, I don’t know if they didn’t understand what
I was asking or if it was that they didn’t understand
the video or, they didn’t want to do it, so I don’t
know.
53. Lesson 1: Learner
feedback
Comprehension difficulties
Pupil 1 : “…quand vous dites une phrase en anglais et il y a
personne qui répond ni rien, enfin la prof d'anglais elle fait ça elle
nous dit une phrase en anglais, quand elle voit qu'il y a un blanc
qu'il y a personne qui dit rien, eh ben elle répète la même mais
en français
Jenny: il faut me dire ça quand vous comprenez ça dès fois il y a
trop d'anglais
Pupil 2: Sinon elle la reformule avec des leçons qu'on a déjà
faites, et du coup vu que ces leçons on a déjà faites ça il y a tout
se rentre dans la tête, du coup ça nous fait réapprendre toutes
les autres leçons.
54. Lesson 1: Tutor feedback
Jenny’s Tutor: So I would have stopped.
They would have had asked me
questions about what was that , how do
you say un camion?
I might have asked them what kind of truck
is it why is there a truck? How do you say:
ils déménagent?
Then we would have watched it again and
this time that’s what I love about that,
everything is you know unlocked, and so
easier and they would have understood.
55. Lesson 2: Aude and Faiza
Structure of the lesson:
• brainstorm requests
• watch extracts from TV
series
• analyse transcripts (who
is talking to whom)
• focus on modals
56. Lesson 2: Student teacher
feedback
Faiza: It was a discovery for us and for them as well....it was
out of the usual framework. Because as an English teacher,
you have to define specific plans with specific objectives. And,
we didn’t do that, for, this lesson actually, based on requests. We
didn’t keep in mind the objective, like linguistic objective or
cultural objectives.… So it was very blurry because we didn’t
know where to start ....because it was so new for us.
Aude: I think they might have realised that we were not
expecting ONE answer. There was no, you know the right one
and the wrong one. So that makes it more pleasant,
altogether.
57. Lesson 2: Learner
feedback
Pupil A: The film is good. Interesting
Pupil B: I think, in classes we work more on the
grammar, grammar than the than the
expression...there is more participation now than the
(pause)
Researcher: the usual classes
Pupil B: Yes.
58. Lesson 2: Tutor feedback
Aude and Faiza’s tutor: "They all
managed to say things what they
don’t say, in class. And I was amazed
at the reactions of some who are
considered as so-called low
achievers and they could react
spontaneously. So this I found this very
interesting……. And, they all looked you
know keen and involved in the
activity. And they were attentive. They
did listen, not only to the teachers,
and the people present, but also to
each other."
59. Lesson 3: Examples of
production activity
The teacher used research cartoons to
elicit learner responses before explicit
instruction
Pupil 1: Can I have a sheet of paper please?
Pupil 2: Can you give me some money. I forgot mine at home.
Pupil 3: Can you explain this, exercise?
Pupil 4: Can you report the nex/ the test after, week.
60. Lesson 3: Analysis phase
Meghan: So what do you notice? In the way you’re making,
the requests.
Pupil 1: It’s always the same verb.
Meghan: Yes. Do you think there is other way to make requests?
Pupil 2: Is it possible to?
Teacher:Yes
Teacher: Any other?
Pupil 3: May I go to
61. Lesson 3: Production
activity
Production after explicit
instruction
Pupil 4: “is it possible to explain me this exercise please?”
Or “Do/ do you think that you’ve time to teach me this
exercise please?"
Pupil 5: “it is possible to report the test the next week. I’m
sorry but is it possible?”
Pupil 3: I’m sorry but, could you lend me some money
please?
62. Including pragmatics in
syllabus
Aude and Faiza's Tutor: I just wondered about the AIM of
the lesson itself. Uh as far as pragmatics is concerned, no
problem. But, in the syllabus or in, you know the type of
documents or units that we study with the students, how
can we relate it, to some unit, for example? That may
be, could be, a possible drawback if I may say. It sounds
to me a very specific grammatical point or aspect of
the language. Now how can we relate it, to the rest of
the unit? Or current events? Or maybe we need to add
some more follow up work. As the student asked me, what
about some more grammatical exercises on modals?
63. Mismatch between secondary EFL
expectations and IL pragmatic goals
• usual focus on grammar and
culture in collège/lycée EFL
•PPP approach based on
grammar point
•translates/subtitles/explains/
UNLOCKS target language
extract
•sets as a lesson to memorise
for subsequence reuse
• materials are selected on the
basis of themes (fitting
cultural objectives) rather
than language used
• pragmatics instruction seeks
to trigger IL development via
•rich input
•noticing of particular aspects
of language
• pragmatics instruction
assumes that similar
pragmatic functions can be
accomplished through a
range of grammatical
structures
(and should not be treated as
grammatical rules)
64. WORKSHOP
OUTLINE 1. BACKGROUND
2. DOCTORAL RESEARCH PROJECT
3. TEACHER EDUCATION COURSE
4. SAMPLE TEACHING MATERIALS
5. FEEDBACK FROM PARTICIPANTS
6. IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING
65. conclusions and
implications
clear patterns in IL pragmatic
development indicate need for
pedagogical intervention
awareness-raising or noticing
activities are relatively easy to
design and implement
production activities seem
harder for novice teachers
questions about integration of
pragmatics instruction in
wider teaching programmes
66. Take-aways
links to cartoon production
prompts
links to other request
lessons
links to other pragmatics
teaching materials
further reading …
wp.me/p28EmH-yL
Shona Whyte
whyte@unice.fr
efl.unice.fr
@whyshona
Aisha Siddiqa
ashsiddiqa1@gmail.com