IODL & ICEM 2010




      Getting the Right Mix:
       Three generations of
  Distance Education Pedagogy:

Terry Anderson, PhD and Professor
Overview
• Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy
• A Network and Connective future for Flexible
     Lifelong and Learning and Education
• Your Comments and Questions!
Athabasca University,
                   Alberta, Canada

                                  Fastest growing university in
                                             Canada
                                 34,000 students, 700 courses
                                   100% distance education
                                        Graduate and
    *   Athabasca University       Undergraduate programs
                                 Master & Doctorate – Distance
*Athabasca                                Education
 University
                                       Only USA Regionally
                                      Accredited University in
                                              Canada
• “Canada is a great
  country, much too
  cold for common
  sense, inhabited by
  compassionate and
  intelligent people
  with bad haircuts”.
  – Yann Martel, Life of Pi, 2002.
Values
• We can (and must) continuously improve the
  quality, effectiveness, appeal, cost and time
  efficiency of the teaching/learning experience.
• Student control and freedom is integral to 21st
  Century life-long education, training and
  learning.
• Current training models do not scale for
  lifelong learning for all residents of our planet.
Three Generations of Flexible Learning
              Pedagogies
1. Behaviourist/Cognitive
   – Self Paced, Individual
   Study
2. Constructivist – Groups
3. Connectivist – Networks
   and Collectives
1. Behavioural/Cognitive
              Pedagogies
• “tell ‘em what you’re
  gonna tell ‘em,
• tell ‘em
• then tell ‘em what you
  told ‘em”


Direct Instruction
Gagne’s Events of Instruction (1965)

1.    Gain learners' attention
2.    Inform learner of objectives
3.    Stimulate recall of previous information
4.    Present stimulus material
5.    Provide learner guidance
6.    Elicit performance
7.    Provide Feedback
8.    Assess performance
9.    Enhance transfer opportunities
 Basis of Instructional Systems Design (ISD)
Enhanced by the “cognitive
                    revolution”
•    Chunking
•    Cognitive Load
•    Working Memory
•    Multiple Representations
•    Split-attention effect
•    Variability Effect
•    Multi-media effect
      – (Sorden, 2005)

    “learning as acquiring and using conceptual and cognitive
    structures” Greeno, Collins and Resnick, 1996
Behaviourist/Cognitive Knowledge Is:
• Logically coherent, existing independent of
  perspective
• Largely context free
• Capable of being transmitted
• Assumes closed systems with discoverable
  relationships between inputs and outputs
Behaviourist/Cognitive Focus is on
 the Content and the Individual
             Learner
LMS as current primary B/C tool
• Secure – hackers, vandals
• Robust
• Custom designed for teaching
• Simple, consistent and adopted
• Supported and Integrated with other institutional
  systems
• Tracking and recoding
• Sophisticated (branching, printing, permissions)
Focus on Content
• Massive global decrease in costs, complexity
  and collaboration,
• Massive Increase in convenience and access
A Tale of 3 books




                       E-Learning for the 21st   Open Access - First Year
Commercial publisher
                       Century                   41,245 + downloads &
934 copies sold at     Commercial Pub.
$52.00                 1200 sold @ $135.00       Individual chapters
Buy at Amazon!!        2,000 copies in Arabic    1202 hardcopies sold @ $40
                       Translation @ $8.
                                                 Free at www.aupress.ca
New Content Providers - ITune U




• “iTunes is not simply a repository of more than 8 million songs, audio
  books, videos and 70,000 or so iPhone applications.
• It also has the world's largest, constantly available, free educational
  resource” — iTunesU.
New Developments in
   Behavioural/Cognitive Systems

• Reflection Amplifiers
• Social Indicators
  – Global feedback
  – Digital footprints
  – Archives
  – Competition and games
• Multiple Representations
• Student modeling and adaptation - analytics
Behavioural/cognitive learning is
 necessary but not sufficient for
       quality education.
2nd Generation -
         Constructivist Training Pedagogy
• New knowledge is built upon the foundation of previous learning
• The importance of context
• Errors and contradictions are useful
• Learning as an active rather than passive process,
• The importance of language and other social tools in constructing
  knowledge
• Focus on negotiation, meta-cognition and evaluation as a means to
  develop learners’ capacity to assess their own learning
• The importance of multiple perspectives - groups
• Need for knowledge to be subject to social discussion, validation
  and application in real world contexts
   – (from Honebein, 1996; Jonassen, 1991; Kanuka& Anderson, 1999)
Constructivist Knowledge is:

• Socially constructed
• Arrived at through dialogic
  encounter
  – (Bakhtin, 1975)
• “education as the discursive
  construction of shared
  knowledge”
  – (Wegerif, R., 2009)

                          Kathy Sierra http://www.speedofcreativity.org/
Constructivist learning is
           Group Learning
• Motivation
• Feedback
• Alternate and conflicting viewpoints
Taxonomy of the ‘Many’ –
   A Conceptual Model
              Dron and Anderson, 2007




          Group
   Conscious membership
 Leadership and organization
     Cohorts and paced
    Rules and guidelines                Metaphor :
 Access and privacy controls
                                        Virtual classroom
Focused and often time limited
    May be blended F2F




                                                            22
Why Groups?
• “Students who learn in small groups
  generally demonstrate greater
  academic achievement, express more
  favorable attitudes toward learning,
  and persist …
• small-group learning may have
  particularly large effects on the
  academic achievement of members of
  underrepresented groups and the
  learning-related attitudes of
  women…”
  • Springer; Stanne, & Donovan, (1999) P.42
Why Groups?
• Athabasca University’s learner-
  paced undergraduate courses
  averaged 63.6% completion rates
  for the 2002-2003 academic year.
• Completion rates for the same
  courses offered in seminar format
  (either through synchronous
  technologies or face-to-face)
  averaged 86.9% over the same
  period (Athabasca University, 2003, p.12)
Constructivist Learning in Groups
• Long history of research
  and study
• Established sets of tools
  – Classrooms
  – Learning Management
    Systems
  – Synchronous (video &
    net conferencing)
  – Email
• Need to develop face to
  face, mediated and
  blended group learning
  skills
                 Garrison, R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in
                 text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education.
                 The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-105.
Advances in Constructivist
           Learning Tools
• Easier tools for group formation and
  collaborative production.
  – LMS advances,
  – Group editing – wiki, Google docs
  – Free synchronous tools- Skype
  – Beyond email – texting, VocieThread,Twitter,
    location awareness
Problems with Groups
• Restrictions in time, space, pace, &
  relationship - NOT OPEN
• Often overly confined by leader
  expectation and institutional
  curriculum control
• Usually Isolated from the authentic
  world of practice
• “low tolerance of internal
  difference, sexist and ethicized
  regulation, high demand for obedience to
  its norms and exclusionary practices.”
  Cousin & Deepwell 2005
• “Pathological politeness” and fear of
  debate
• Group think (Baron, 2005)
• Poor preparation for Lifelong Learning
  beyond the course
• Constructivist learning in Groups is necessary,
  but not sufficient for advanced forms of
  learning.
3rd Generation - Networked Learning using
         Connectivist Pedagogy
• Learning is building networks of
  information, contacts and resources that are
  applied to real problems.
Connectivist Learning Principles
       George Siemens, 2004
• Learning and knowledge rests in diversity of opinions.
• Learning is a process of connecting specialized nodes or
  information sources.
• Learning may reside in non-human appliances.
• Capacity to know is more critical than what is currently
  known.
• Ability to see connections between fields, ideas, and
  concepts is a core skill.
• Currency (accurate, up-to-date knowledge) is the intent
  of all connectivist learning activities.
Connectivist Knowledge is
•   Emergent
•   Distributed
•   Chaotic
•   Fragmented
•   Non sequential
•   Contextualized
Connectivist Learning designs
                Connection forming
                    Selection
                     Filtering




Awareness and                              Contribution and
 Receptivity                                 Involvement




                  Reflection and
                  Metacognition

                                     Pettenati, M. (2007).
Special Issue of IRRODL on
Connectivism coming Nov. 2010




Free Subscriptions at www.irrodl.org
Connectivist focuses on Networks -
           - not Groups


                                   Network
                             Shared interest/practice
                                Fluid membership
                                Friends of friends
              Group
                          Reputation and altruism driven
                           Emergent norms, structures
                             Activity ebbs and flows
                                    Rarely F2F




                           Metaphor: Virtual Community of Practice
                                                                     34
Dron and Anderson, 2007
Networks add diversity to learning
“People who live in
  the intersection of
  social worlds are at
  higher risk of having
  good ideas” Burt,
  2005, p. 90
Connectivist Designs build
              Social Capital
• “The sum of actual and potential
  resources embedded within,
  available through, and derived from
  the network of relationships
  possessed by an individual or social
  unit.” Nahapiet and Ghoshal (1998,
  p.243)
                                         Photo greensoleshoes.com
How do we Build Networks of Practice ?
• Motivation – learning plans, self and net
  efficacy, net-presence
• Structural support
  – Exposure and training
  – Transparent systems
  – Wireless access, mobile computing
• Cognitive skills – content + procedural,
  disclosure control
• Social connections, reciprocity
  – Creating and sustaining a spiral of social capital building
     • Nahapiet & Ghoshal (1998)
Connectivist Tools - Web 2.0 &
 Personal Learning Networks




            http://www.go2web20.net/
Network Tool Set (example)



                             Text
                              Text




39
         Stepanyan, Mather & Payne, 2007
Access Controls in Elgg
OERs, YouTUBE       Open Net                         Research/Community
                                                          Networks



                                               MY AU
                                               Login
                                                              Discovery
                               Passwords                      Read & Comment
                                                  Passwords
                  AlFresco
                    CMS
     Course                                                   Athabasca Landing
  Development                                     Sample CC
                                                  Course units and
Athabasca                                         Branded OERs       E-Portfolios
                  Moodle                           AUspace           Profiles ELGG
University
                              Single Sign on      Media lab          Networks
                   Registry                                          Bookmarks
                                                                     Blogs
        Library                                        C
                                                       I Secondlife campus
                                                       D
                                                       E
                                                       R
Challenges of Connectivist Learning
              Models
•   Privacy
•   Control
•   Dealing with disruptive change
•   Institutional Support
•   Sustaining motivation and
    commitment
3 Generations of DE Pedagogy
                   Summary




Anderson, T. & Dron, J. (in press) Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. IRRODL
Conclusion
• Behavioural/Cognitive models are useful for
  memory and conceptual knowledge acquisition.
• Constructivist models develop group skills and
  negotiated knowledge.
• Connectivist models and tools introduce
  networked learning and are foundational for
  lifelong learning.
• 21st Century Literacy's and skills demand
  effective use of all three pedagogies
Anderson & Dron (in press) 3 generations of DE Pedagogy. International
Review of Research in Distance and Open Learning (IRRODL)
"He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes;
     he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever.”
                       Chinese Proverb



Your comments and questions most
          welcomed!

     Terry Anderson terrya@athabascau.ca
                           Blog: terrya.edublogs.org

Iodl & icem 2010

  • 1.
    IODL & ICEM2010 Getting the Right Mix: Three generations of Distance Education Pedagogy: Terry Anderson, PhD and Professor
  • 2.
    Overview • Generations ofDistance Education Pedagogy • A Network and Connective future for Flexible Lifelong and Learning and Education • Your Comments and Questions!
  • 3.
    Athabasca University, Alberta, Canada Fastest growing university in Canada 34,000 students, 700 courses 100% distance education Graduate and * Athabasca University Undergraduate programs Master & Doctorate – Distance *Athabasca Education University Only USA Regionally Accredited University in Canada
  • 4.
    • “Canada isa great country, much too cold for common sense, inhabited by compassionate and intelligent people with bad haircuts”. – Yann Martel, Life of Pi, 2002.
  • 6.
    Values • We can(and must) continuously improve the quality, effectiveness, appeal, cost and time efficiency of the teaching/learning experience. • Student control and freedom is integral to 21st Century life-long education, training and learning. • Current training models do not scale for lifelong learning for all residents of our planet.
  • 7.
    Three Generations ofFlexible Learning Pedagogies 1. Behaviourist/Cognitive – Self Paced, Individual Study 2. Constructivist – Groups 3. Connectivist – Networks and Collectives
  • 8.
    1. Behavioural/Cognitive Pedagogies • “tell ‘em what you’re gonna tell ‘em, • tell ‘em • then tell ‘em what you told ‘em” Direct Instruction
  • 9.
    Gagne’s Events ofInstruction (1965) 1. Gain learners' attention 2. Inform learner of objectives 3. Stimulate recall of previous information 4. Present stimulus material 5. Provide learner guidance 6. Elicit performance 7. Provide Feedback 8. Assess performance 9. Enhance transfer opportunities Basis of Instructional Systems Design (ISD)
  • 10.
    Enhanced by the“cognitive revolution” • Chunking • Cognitive Load • Working Memory • Multiple Representations • Split-attention effect • Variability Effect • Multi-media effect – (Sorden, 2005) “learning as acquiring and using conceptual and cognitive structures” Greeno, Collins and Resnick, 1996
  • 11.
    Behaviourist/Cognitive Knowledge Is: •Logically coherent, existing independent of perspective • Largely context free • Capable of being transmitted • Assumes closed systems with discoverable relationships between inputs and outputs
  • 12.
    Behaviourist/Cognitive Focus ison the Content and the Individual Learner
  • 13.
    LMS as currentprimary B/C tool • Secure – hackers, vandals • Robust • Custom designed for teaching • Simple, consistent and adopted • Supported and Integrated with other institutional systems • Tracking and recoding • Sophisticated (branching, printing, permissions)
  • 14.
    Focus on Content •Massive global decrease in costs, complexity and collaboration, • Massive Increase in convenience and access
  • 15.
    A Tale of3 books E-Learning for the 21st Open Access - First Year Commercial publisher Century 41,245 + downloads & 934 copies sold at Commercial Pub. $52.00 1200 sold @ $135.00 Individual chapters Buy at Amazon!! 2,000 copies in Arabic 1202 hardcopies sold @ $40 Translation @ $8. Free at www.aupress.ca
  • 16.
    New Content Providers- ITune U • “iTunes is not simply a repository of more than 8 million songs, audio books, videos and 70,000 or so iPhone applications. • It also has the world's largest, constantly available, free educational resource” — iTunesU.
  • 17.
    New Developments in Behavioural/Cognitive Systems • Reflection Amplifiers • Social Indicators – Global feedback – Digital footprints – Archives – Competition and games • Multiple Representations • Student modeling and adaptation - analytics
  • 18.
    Behavioural/cognitive learning is necessary but not sufficient for quality education.
  • 19.
    2nd Generation - Constructivist Training Pedagogy • New knowledge is built upon the foundation of previous learning • The importance of context • Errors and contradictions are useful • Learning as an active rather than passive process, • The importance of language and other social tools in constructing knowledge • Focus on negotiation, meta-cognition and evaluation as a means to develop learners’ capacity to assess their own learning • The importance of multiple perspectives - groups • Need for knowledge to be subject to social discussion, validation and application in real world contexts – (from Honebein, 1996; Jonassen, 1991; Kanuka& Anderson, 1999)
  • 20.
    Constructivist Knowledge is: •Socially constructed • Arrived at through dialogic encounter – (Bakhtin, 1975) • “education as the discursive construction of shared knowledge” – (Wegerif, R., 2009) Kathy Sierra http://www.speedofcreativity.org/
  • 21.
    Constructivist learning is Group Learning • Motivation • Feedback • Alternate and conflicting viewpoints
  • 22.
    Taxonomy of the‘Many’ – A Conceptual Model Dron and Anderson, 2007 Group Conscious membership Leadership and organization Cohorts and paced Rules and guidelines Metaphor : Access and privacy controls Virtual classroom Focused and often time limited May be blended F2F 22
  • 23.
    Why Groups? • “Studentswho learn in small groups generally demonstrate greater academic achievement, express more favorable attitudes toward learning, and persist … • small-group learning may have particularly large effects on the academic achievement of members of underrepresented groups and the learning-related attitudes of women…” • Springer; Stanne, & Donovan, (1999) P.42
  • 24.
    Why Groups? • AthabascaUniversity’s learner- paced undergraduate courses averaged 63.6% completion rates for the 2002-2003 academic year. • Completion rates for the same courses offered in seminar format (either through synchronous technologies or face-to-face) averaged 86.9% over the same period (Athabasca University, 2003, p.12)
  • 25.
    Constructivist Learning inGroups • Long history of research and study • Established sets of tools – Classrooms – Learning Management Systems – Synchronous (video & net conferencing) – Email • Need to develop face to face, mediated and blended group learning skills Garrison, R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-105.
  • 26.
    Advances in Constructivist Learning Tools • Easier tools for group formation and collaborative production. – LMS advances, – Group editing – wiki, Google docs – Free synchronous tools- Skype – Beyond email – texting, VocieThread,Twitter, location awareness
  • 27.
    Problems with Groups •Restrictions in time, space, pace, & relationship - NOT OPEN • Often overly confined by leader expectation and institutional curriculum control • Usually Isolated from the authentic world of practice • “low tolerance of internal difference, sexist and ethicized regulation, high demand for obedience to its norms and exclusionary practices.” Cousin & Deepwell 2005 • “Pathological politeness” and fear of debate • Group think (Baron, 2005) • Poor preparation for Lifelong Learning beyond the course
  • 28.
    • Constructivist learningin Groups is necessary, but not sufficient for advanced forms of learning.
  • 29.
    3rd Generation -Networked Learning using Connectivist Pedagogy • Learning is building networks of information, contacts and resources that are applied to real problems.
  • 30.
    Connectivist Learning Principles George Siemens, 2004 • Learning and knowledge rests in diversity of opinions. • Learning is a process of connecting specialized nodes or information sources. • Learning may reside in non-human appliances. • Capacity to know is more critical than what is currently known. • Ability to see connections between fields, ideas, and concepts is a core skill. • Currency (accurate, up-to-date knowledge) is the intent of all connectivist learning activities.
  • 31.
    Connectivist Knowledge is • Emergent • Distributed • Chaotic • Fragmented • Non sequential • Contextualized
  • 32.
    Connectivist Learning designs Connection forming Selection Filtering Awareness and Contribution and Receptivity Involvement Reflection and Metacognition Pettenati, M. (2007).
  • 33.
    Special Issue ofIRRODL on Connectivism coming Nov. 2010 Free Subscriptions at www.irrodl.org
  • 34.
    Connectivist focuses onNetworks - - not Groups Network Shared interest/practice Fluid membership Friends of friends Group Reputation and altruism driven Emergent norms, structures Activity ebbs and flows Rarely F2F Metaphor: Virtual Community of Practice 34 Dron and Anderson, 2007
  • 35.
    Networks add diversityto learning “People who live in the intersection of social worlds are at higher risk of having good ideas” Burt, 2005, p. 90
  • 36.
    Connectivist Designs build Social Capital • “The sum of actual and potential resources embedded within, available through, and derived from the network of relationships possessed by an individual or social unit.” Nahapiet and Ghoshal (1998, p.243) Photo greensoleshoes.com
  • 37.
    How do weBuild Networks of Practice ? • Motivation – learning plans, self and net efficacy, net-presence • Structural support – Exposure and training – Transparent systems – Wireless access, mobile computing • Cognitive skills – content + procedural, disclosure control • Social connections, reciprocity – Creating and sustaining a spiral of social capital building • Nahapiet & Ghoshal (1998)
  • 38.
    Connectivist Tools -Web 2.0 & Personal Learning Networks http://www.go2web20.net/
  • 39.
    Network Tool Set(example) Text Text 39 Stepanyan, Mather & Payne, 2007
  • 40.
  • 41.
    OERs, YouTUBE Open Net Research/Community Networks MY AU Login Discovery Passwords Read & Comment Passwords AlFresco CMS Course Athabasca Landing Development Sample CC Course units and Athabasca Branded OERs E-Portfolios Moodle AUspace Profiles ELGG University Single Sign on Media lab Networks Registry Bookmarks Blogs Library C I Secondlife campus D E R
  • 42.
    Challenges of ConnectivistLearning Models • Privacy • Control • Dealing with disruptive change • Institutional Support • Sustaining motivation and commitment
  • 43.
    3 Generations ofDE Pedagogy Summary Anderson, T. & Dron, J. (in press) Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. IRRODL
  • 44.
    Conclusion • Behavioural/Cognitive modelsare useful for memory and conceptual knowledge acquisition. • Constructivist models develop group skills and negotiated knowledge. • Connectivist models and tools introduce networked learning and are foundational for lifelong learning. • 21st Century Literacy's and skills demand effective use of all three pedagogies Anderson & Dron (in press) 3 generations of DE Pedagogy. International Review of Research in Distance and Open Learning (IRRODL)
  • 45.
    "He who asksa question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever.” Chinese Proverb Your comments and questions most welcomed! Terry Anderson terrya@athabascau.ca Blog: terrya.edublogs.org