Guest lecture given at the Communications University of China, Higher Education Research Institute. On the request of the audience an introduction on Belgian culture was added.
1. New learning
paradigms & technologies
Prof. dr. Frederik Questier, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Guest lecture at Communications University of China, Higher Education Research Institute, 16/10/2010
2. This presentation can be found at
http://questier.com
http://www.slideshare.net/Frederik_Questier
25. Projects with Kenia
(Nairobi and Moi universities)
Expertise Centre ICT for edu
Training
Consultancy
Research
Postgraduate master ICT in Education 25
28. Educational Innovation?
Why change the way we teach and learn?
How to change the way we teach and learn?
(with or without technologies)
28
29. Why change the way
we teach and learn?
“Schools we have today
were designed around commonsense assumptions
that had never been scientifically tested”
R. Keith Sawyer
29
30. Why change the way
we teach and learn?
Because everything else is changing !
30
33. information scarcity → information abundance !
Total information is now doubling every year ! 33
34. Evolution of the internet?
Web 2.0 (social and collaborative)
Web 3.0 (semantic)
Mobile and Ubiquitous
The internet of things
Global brain – intelligence
34
37. Evolution of organizations
Source: Jessica Lipnack and Jeffrey Stamps, Virtual Teams
http://www.netage.com/pub/books/VirtualTeams%202/CHAPTERS%20PDF/chapter02.pdf
37
47. You will have to
compete with
amateurs!
An enthusiastic amateur beats
a bored professional
“Karl Marx was perhaps
the original prophet of the
Professional Amateurs
economy:
labour
– forced, unspontaneous
and waged work –
would be superseded
by self-activity”
47
50. Demand for new skills?
➢ Social skills
➢ communicating, networking, teamwork
➢ international, intercultural
➢ Creativity
➢ Entrepeneurship
➢ Information technology skills
➢ Handle information overload
➢ ...
➢
➢ Learning to learn → Life Long Learning!
50
51. Knowledge -> Skills ->
Competences
➢ Competences
➢ are the ability to use
➢ knowledge
➢ skills
➢ attitudes
➢ in new, complex, authentic situations
51
53. Staff are digital immigrants,
students are digital natives
(Prensky)
53
54. Discrepancy?
What are students used to? What is their classroom experience?
control no control
action passive
instant feedback little, late feedback
rich media poor media
always online offline
social interactions working together = cheating
54
55. Why change the way
we teach and learn?
It's a matter of quality!
“The highest-ranked universities are the ones that
make significant contributions to the advancement of knowledge through research,
teach with the most innovative curricula and pedagogical methods
under the most conducive circumstances”
World Bank
55
56. Why change the way
we teach and learn?
We have new scientific knowledge
about teaching and learning
56
57. Major learning theories
Behaviourism Learning = change of behaviour
Stimulus → response
Learner is passive receiver of knowledge
Mind = black box
Cognitivism Focuses on how the brain works
Metacognition, learning strategies
Motivation
Constructivism Knowledge is actively constructed by the learner
New knowledge is linked to prior knowledge
Learners discover themselves facts and relationships
Social Constructivism Social interaction plays a fundamental role
Discussions lead to deeper understanding and increased motivation
Constructionism Constructing an artifact or something that can be shared leads to
better learning
Connectivism Learning is a process of connecting nodes or information sources
Knowledge and learning may reside in non-human appliances
Try to see connections between fields, ideas, and concepts
Know-what & Know-how → Know-where
57
58. Educational innovation?
Traditional learning New Learning
teacher oriented student oriented
(passive) knowledge transfer (active) knowledge construction; interaction
focus on knowledge focus on competences
individual learning collaborative learning
focus on course contents also focus on learning process
(learning to learn, reflection)
teacher = expert teacher = coach
teacher directs also self-directed learning
selective education adaptive education
students focus on good scores attention for (intrinsic) motivation
surface learning deep (natural) learning
58
59. Educational innovation?
Traditional learning New Learning
abstract, school-like examples & tasks authentic contexts
evaluation by teacher self/co/peer-assessment, ...
summative evaluation + formative evaluation
(learning from mistakes and feedback)
linear curriculum flexible curriculum
independent courses and disciplines connexion, integration, interdisciplinarity
supply oriented demand oriented
uniform education differentiated education
(adapted to e.g. learning styles)
classroom flexible learning environment
(also online & virtual)
course materials powerful learning environments
formal learning + informal learning
behaviorism and cognitivism Social constructivism (and connectivism)
59
60. How can we improve
teaching and learning with ICT?
Don't apply traditional teaching methods
in new technologies!
Substitution?
(dropping your coursebook online)
Transformation!
60
61. Seek the synergy!
Theories about learning
and technologies
have evolved
towards very similar concepts
61
62. Model Jonassen for
(constructive) learning environments
→ Technologies can support the intentional construction,
in a collaborative way, of complex contextualized artifacts
and the conversation and reflection about it
62
82. Evolution in E-learning?
e-learning 1.0 e-learning 2.0
closed source software open source software
solitary platform integrated in ICT-environment
closed to outer world open where useful,closed where necessary
only own institution connected with other institutions
focus on technology focus on pedagogy
consumption interaction
courses communities
teacher oriented student centered
content management knowledge management
upload of materials authoring environment
tools intelligent assistant
institutional learning environment personal learning environment
82
83. Is this ICT supported
learning paradigm shift
possible without
teacher learning/training?
84. Research studies show that
how much and how effectively
teachers integrate ICT
in their teaching process
depends mainly on their educational vision
(not age, gender, ...)
84
85. What will you remember from this seminar?
Which recommendations do you have for you university?
85