Derek Wenmoth
Director, eLearning
Core Education Ltd
derek@core-ed.net
Report Card

• We’re doing OK - based on evidence from our own
  research an international comparisons.
  (http://www.core-ed.org/lab/research-report/evaluations-of-information-
  communication-technology-professional-development)
    – Differences evident in the ways primary & secondary schools are
      using ICTs.
    – Age is a myth - not true that it’s only the younger teachers who
      are working with ICTs
    – Emphasis on skills as PD primary focus doesn’t work
• Teachers continuing to progress from adoption to
  assimilation…
Prominence/connectedness


         •   Prominence describes the extent to
             which ICTs are explicitly made a part of
             the teaching and learning
         •   Connectedness describes the
             explicitness of ICT use with the
             curriculum goals and intent
         •   The relationship between the two
             illustrates the extent of integration (see
             following slides for more detail)
Addition




• Total or almost total focus on ICT, ICT skills, ICT
  planning.
• Little or no connection to thinking, learning,
  cognitive challenge, philosophy etc.
• Computer activity separated in time and place
  from other learning.
• Emphasis on use per se.
Incorporation




• ICT a significant aspect of focus
• Some connection to curriculum, thinking,
  learning, cognitive challenge, philosophy etc.
• Computer activity probably separated in time
  and place from other learning.
• Emphasis on frequent use
Integration




• Some ICT consciousness still present
• High connectedness ICT activity with thinking,
  learning, challenge, philosophy
• Computer activity linked in time or place with
  other learning.
• Emphasis on appropriate use
Assimilation




• Total or almost total focus on learning.
• High but subconscious connectedness between ICT
  activity and curriculum, philosophy, learning
  theory/styles, thinking etc.
• Computer activity embedded in long term structure
  for learning.
• Emphasis on spontaneous use and student choice
Impact of digital technology
    From international research…




Key findings:
• Increased learner effectiveness or
  performance gains
• Increased learner efficiency
• Greater learner engagement or
  satisfaction
• More positive student attitudes to
  learning
Two facts

a.   ICT has a powerful defining impact on all
     important aspects of our lives and hence
     our culture

b.   The ICT revolution is a part of a group of
     intertwined revolutions that in the past 20
     years have been transforming Western
     culture from a modern into a postmodern
     culture
                                                        iv e r y
                                    ucat io n a l d e l
                    p ly a bout e d
         ’s not sim
       It’
        t
Three strategies for the future


                    • A minimum emphasis - not a comfortable
                        option
                    • Getting technology to serve the system -
                        supporting the existing structures
                    • Merge and evolve - adapt and respond to
                        new possibilities
                                                                                     n
                                                              s ta in a b le o p tio
                                               -focu sed & su
                           he o n ly fu tu r e
   O p tio n th r e e is t
Successful schools….

Schools that are well resourced in technology and show the greatest
improvement in results have the following characteristics: (p.20)
 •     Technology informs rather than leads decisions about teaching and learning
 •     Resource decisions are addressed head-on, with a move to more flexible
       approaches
 •     There is effective technical support that is seen as a central element of the
       whole school strategy
 •     There is a realistic expectation of the level of support, including development
       time, needed to change the educational practice of teachers
                                                                                                   h o o ls
                                                                             p e r ie n c e in s c
                                                         th th e liv e d e x
                                      and v a lu e s w i
               t lin k in g v is io n
     It’s abou
      t’
Policy issues


•   Lack of coherent vision and leadership
•   Time for a new ‘metaphor’
•   Locked in a ‘stable state’ mindset
•   Future ICT Trends
Lack of coherent vision…


             Technological change is not
             additive, it is ecological.
             A new technology doesn’t just
             change something…
             … it changes everything!




          But do we really believe this…?
          How is this belief reflected in policy?
A new metaphor...

TRADITIONAL             CONNECTED             NETWORKED


      F2F
  Classrooms
                            Intranets           Knowledge


    Teaching                                   Virtual Learning
                            e Learning         Networked schools
    & process
                           focus on learner
   of instruction                                and learners



                            Extranets           Networks
   Distance
   Education



                      The emergence of the networked school
Beyond the stable state

The loss of the stable state means that our society and all of its institutions are in continuous
processes of transformation. We cannot expect new stable states that will endure for our own
lifetimes.
We must learn to understand, guide, influence and manage these transformations. We must make the
capacity for undertaking them integral to ourselves and to our institutions.
We must, in other words, become adept at learning. We must become able not only to transform our
institutions, in response to changing situations and requirements; we must invent and develop
institutions which are ‘learning systems’, that is to say, systems capable of bringing about their own
                                 systems’
continuing transformation.
The task which the loss of the stable state makes imperative, for the person, for our institutions, for
our society as a whole, is to learn about learning.

   –     What is the nature of the process by which organizations, institutions and societies transform themselves?

   –     What are the characteristics of effective learning systems?

   –     What are the forms and limits of knowledge that can operate within processes of social learning?

   –     What demands are made on a person who engages in this kind of learning? (Schon 1973: 28-9)
                                                                                 (Schon

                                                                 Beyond the stable state, Donald Schon, 1973
                                                                                                 Schon,
Future ICT Trends

                         Next 12 months:
                         • Mobile internet devices
                         • Personal clouds
                         2-3 years
                         • Open content
                         • Virtual, Augmented and
                            Alternate realities
                         4-5 years
                         • Location-based learning
                         • Smart objects
http://www.nmc.org/news/nmc/7292
CORE’s Ten Trends

                    1.    Changing role of teachers and learners
                    2.    Internet capable, mobile devices for learning
                    3.    Globalised learning
                    4.    Ubiquitous computing
                    5.    Cyber citizenship
                    6.    Digital literacy
                    7.    Open education resources
                    8.    Cloud computing
                    9.    Advanced networks and school ‘loops’
                                                          loops’
                    10.   Assessment practices




http://www.core-ed.org/lab/core-ten-trends-2010
Issues to consider…

To achieve the networked school future, we need to
consider….
  –   Policy issues
  –   Technology issues
  –   Curriculum issues
  –   Staffing issues
  –   Pedagogical issues
  –   Leadership and coordination issues
  –   Learning resources issues
  –   Quality issues
Policy issues


• How can student funding be shared between schools?
• How can staffing, including management units, be shared
  among schools
• What evidence needs to be gathered to demonstrate the
  worth of this?
Technology issues


• Connectivity and interoperability – who sets the
  standards?
• Networks – VPNs, MUSH etc
• Bridging – what is required? What technologies must be
  supported?
• Scheduling – enable direct access and school level
  control?
• IAM, interoperability issues
Curriculum issues


• Assessment – developing consistency in approach
• Reporting – enabling a unified student report from
  several ‘schools’ etc
• Modularisation – a different view of ‘course’
• RPL – includes recognising the value of informal learning
Staffing issues


• Creating more flexibility in recognising teacher roles: e-
  teachers, m-teachers, c-teachers,
• How to involve those with real subject expertise as
  mentors, hot-seats etc
• Teacher registration issues
• Mentoring roles
Pedagogical issues


• “personalisation” – what does it mean? How do we make
  it happen?
• Matching pedagogy to technology?
• Instructional design - learning design?
• staff training – how to train a large group of the teaching
  force in these new approaches?
Leadership and coordination issues


•   Who is providing the leadership
•   Who should provide the leadership?
•   What form should leadership take?
•   What support is required for leadership?
•   What coordination is required nationally, locally etc?
Learning Resource issues


• How best to provide resources for learning to support
  teachers in this environment
• learning objects, repositories, search tools – who
  provides them, who manages them etc?
• how to cater for user-generated resources?
• Copyright and IP issues – how are these to be managed?
• Role of creative commons and Open Education
  Resources (OER)?
Quality issues


•   What is best practice?
•   What benchmarks do we use?
•   What are quality indicators?
•   How do we know we’re preparing for their future,
    not our past?
Thankyou
  education leaders
  and policy makers



          Derek Wenmoth
         Director, eLearning
         CORE Education Ltd
             derek@core-ed.net
       http://blog.core-ed.net/derek

Nat partyedpolicyforumjuly10

  • 1.
    Derek Wenmoth Director, eLearning CoreEducation Ltd derek@core-ed.net
  • 2.
    Report Card • We’redoing OK - based on evidence from our own research an international comparisons. (http://www.core-ed.org/lab/research-report/evaluations-of-information- communication-technology-professional-development) – Differences evident in the ways primary & secondary schools are using ICTs. – Age is a myth - not true that it’s only the younger teachers who are working with ICTs – Emphasis on skills as PD primary focus doesn’t work • Teachers continuing to progress from adoption to assimilation…
  • 3.
    Prominence/connectedness • Prominence describes the extent to which ICTs are explicitly made a part of the teaching and learning • Connectedness describes the explicitness of ICT use with the curriculum goals and intent • The relationship between the two illustrates the extent of integration (see following slides for more detail)
  • 4.
    Addition • Total oralmost total focus on ICT, ICT skills, ICT planning. • Little or no connection to thinking, learning, cognitive challenge, philosophy etc. • Computer activity separated in time and place from other learning. • Emphasis on use per se.
  • 5.
    Incorporation • ICT asignificant aspect of focus • Some connection to curriculum, thinking, learning, cognitive challenge, philosophy etc. • Computer activity probably separated in time and place from other learning. • Emphasis on frequent use
  • 6.
    Integration • Some ICTconsciousness still present • High connectedness ICT activity with thinking, learning, challenge, philosophy • Computer activity linked in time or place with other learning. • Emphasis on appropriate use
  • 7.
    Assimilation • Total oralmost total focus on learning. • High but subconscious connectedness between ICT activity and curriculum, philosophy, learning theory/styles, thinking etc. • Computer activity embedded in long term structure for learning. • Emphasis on spontaneous use and student choice
  • 8.
    Impact of digitaltechnology From international research… Key findings: • Increased learner effectiveness or performance gains • Increased learner efficiency • Greater learner engagement or satisfaction • More positive student attitudes to learning
  • 9.
    Two facts a. ICT has a powerful defining impact on all important aspects of our lives and hence our culture b. The ICT revolution is a part of a group of intertwined revolutions that in the past 20 years have been transforming Western culture from a modern into a postmodern culture iv e r y ucat io n a l d e l p ly a bout e d ’s not sim It’ t
  • 10.
    Three strategies forthe future • A minimum emphasis - not a comfortable option • Getting technology to serve the system - supporting the existing structures • Merge and evolve - adapt and respond to new possibilities n s ta in a b le o p tio -focu sed & su he o n ly fu tu r e O p tio n th r e e is t
  • 11.
    Successful schools…. Schools thatare well resourced in technology and show the greatest improvement in results have the following characteristics: (p.20) • Technology informs rather than leads decisions about teaching and learning • Resource decisions are addressed head-on, with a move to more flexible approaches • There is effective technical support that is seen as a central element of the whole school strategy • There is a realistic expectation of the level of support, including development time, needed to change the educational practice of teachers h o o ls p e r ie n c e in s c th th e liv e d e x and v a lu e s w i t lin k in g v is io n It’s abou t’
  • 12.
    Policy issues • Lack of coherent vision and leadership • Time for a new ‘metaphor’ • Locked in a ‘stable state’ mindset • Future ICT Trends
  • 13.
    Lack of coherentvision… Technological change is not additive, it is ecological. A new technology doesn’t just change something… … it changes everything! But do we really believe this…? How is this belief reflected in policy?
  • 14.
    A new metaphor... TRADITIONAL CONNECTED NETWORKED F2F Classrooms Intranets Knowledge Teaching Virtual Learning e Learning Networked schools & process focus on learner of instruction and learners Extranets Networks Distance Education The emergence of the networked school
  • 15.
    Beyond the stablestate The loss of the stable state means that our society and all of its institutions are in continuous processes of transformation. We cannot expect new stable states that will endure for our own lifetimes. We must learn to understand, guide, influence and manage these transformations. We must make the capacity for undertaking them integral to ourselves and to our institutions. We must, in other words, become adept at learning. We must become able not only to transform our institutions, in response to changing situations and requirements; we must invent and develop institutions which are ‘learning systems’, that is to say, systems capable of bringing about their own systems’ continuing transformation. The task which the loss of the stable state makes imperative, for the person, for our institutions, for our society as a whole, is to learn about learning. – What is the nature of the process by which organizations, institutions and societies transform themselves? – What are the characteristics of effective learning systems? – What are the forms and limits of knowledge that can operate within processes of social learning? – What demands are made on a person who engages in this kind of learning? (Schon 1973: 28-9) (Schon Beyond the stable state, Donald Schon, 1973 Schon,
  • 16.
    Future ICT Trends Next 12 months: • Mobile internet devices • Personal clouds 2-3 years • Open content • Virtual, Augmented and Alternate realities 4-5 years • Location-based learning • Smart objects http://www.nmc.org/news/nmc/7292
  • 17.
    CORE’s Ten Trends 1. Changing role of teachers and learners 2. Internet capable, mobile devices for learning 3. Globalised learning 4. Ubiquitous computing 5. Cyber citizenship 6. Digital literacy 7. Open education resources 8. Cloud computing 9. Advanced networks and school ‘loops’ loops’ 10. Assessment practices http://www.core-ed.org/lab/core-ten-trends-2010
  • 18.
    Issues to consider… Toachieve the networked school future, we need to consider…. – Policy issues – Technology issues – Curriculum issues – Staffing issues – Pedagogical issues – Leadership and coordination issues – Learning resources issues – Quality issues
  • 19.
    Policy issues • Howcan student funding be shared between schools? • How can staffing, including management units, be shared among schools • What evidence needs to be gathered to demonstrate the worth of this?
  • 20.
    Technology issues • Connectivityand interoperability – who sets the standards? • Networks – VPNs, MUSH etc • Bridging – what is required? What technologies must be supported? • Scheduling – enable direct access and school level control? • IAM, interoperability issues
  • 21.
    Curriculum issues • Assessment– developing consistency in approach • Reporting – enabling a unified student report from several ‘schools’ etc • Modularisation – a different view of ‘course’ • RPL – includes recognising the value of informal learning
  • 22.
    Staffing issues • Creatingmore flexibility in recognising teacher roles: e- teachers, m-teachers, c-teachers, • How to involve those with real subject expertise as mentors, hot-seats etc • Teacher registration issues • Mentoring roles
  • 23.
    Pedagogical issues • “personalisation”– what does it mean? How do we make it happen? • Matching pedagogy to technology? • Instructional design - learning design? • staff training – how to train a large group of the teaching force in these new approaches?
  • 24.
    Leadership and coordinationissues • Who is providing the leadership • Who should provide the leadership? • What form should leadership take? • What support is required for leadership? • What coordination is required nationally, locally etc?
  • 25.
    Learning Resource issues •How best to provide resources for learning to support teachers in this environment • learning objects, repositories, search tools – who provides them, who manages them etc? • how to cater for user-generated resources? • Copyright and IP issues – how are these to be managed? • Role of creative commons and Open Education Resources (OER)?
  • 26.
    Quality issues • What is best practice? • What benchmarks do we use? • What are quality indicators? • How do we know we’re preparing for their future, not our past?
  • 27.
    Thankyou educationleaders and policy makers Derek Wenmoth Director, eLearning CORE Education Ltd derek@core-ed.net http://blog.core-ed.net/derek