This document summarizes a study on securing tenure rights for forest-dependent communities through forest tenure reforms. It provides background on forest tenure reforms globally and the research approach. Key points: - Forest tenure reforms aim to change rights and responsibilities over forests, focusing on communities and smallholders. Most forestlands are state-owned or -administered. - Between 2002-2013, there was a 128.5 million hectare increase in lands designated for or owned by indigenous and other communities. Reforms vary regionally. - The study examines factors enabling/constraining reforms, impacts on rights/livelihoods, and how implementation can be strengthened. It uses a participatory, comparative approach including scenario development.

1. Anne M. Larson, EGT Team Leader, CIFOR-ICRAF
Iliana Monterroso, Scientist, Co-coordinator of gender and social inclusion research, CIFOR-ICRAF
IFAD-CGIAR Partnership Webinar Series #3
9 March 2021
Securing Tenure Rights for Forest-Dependent
Communities: A global comparative study of
design and implementation of tenure reform

2. What is a “forest tenure reform”?
• A change in the set of rights and responsibilities to use, manage or control forest
or forest land
• For which right holder: (our specific interest) Communities, indigenous people,
smallholders

3. Forest Tenure Reforms
Source: RRI, 2018:18
Mostforestlands are owned and
administeredby the state
• Latin America - 48%
• Africa 92%
• Asia 65%

4. Forest tenure reforms:
Global change in forest land tenure
2650.1
49.8
333.2
369.9
2405.6
96.3
415.2 379.4
0.0
500.0
1000.0
1500.0
2000.0
2500.0
3000.0
Administered by
Government
Designated for IPs and other
Communities
Owned by IPs and other
Communities
Owned by Individuals and
Firms
Million
hectares
2002
2013
Increase of at least
128.5 Mha
Between 2002 and 2013
In lands Designated and Owned by IPs
and Other Communities
Source: Rights and Resources Initiative,
2016

5. Forest tenure reforms:
Regional differences

6. Devolution of forest rights across developing
regions
Source: Based on Lawry and McLain, 2012:56. Devolution of
Forest Rights and SustainableForest Management. Volume1.

7. Research countries

8. Research questions
▪ Establish how forest tenure reforms emerge:
opportunities, and options for formal approaches
to securing customary rights.
▪ Identify factors that enable or constrain reform
implementation.
▪ Identify impacts of tenure reform on rights,
livelihoods and security of women, poor men and
ethnic minorities to forests and trees.
▪ How reform implementation can be strengthened
/improved.

9. •Prospectiveparticipatory
Analysis
•Focus GroupDiscussions;
•Key informant interviews;
•Intrahousehold surveys
•Key informant interviews;
•Survey toAgent’s of
Implementation
•Legal and Institutional
Analysis;
• Historical Analysis
Reform Implementation
Granting
Outcomes
Mobilization
&
Conflict
A framework to analyze tenure reform processes
(1) Methods

10. LEGAL REFORM
• Historical Analysis: Social actors
(Supporting / Opposing)
• Legal Analysis: Regulatory
Framework
REFORM IMPLEMENTATION
•Analysis of government
institutions in charge of reform
implementation (Surveys and
Interviews)
•Institutional framework
•Procedures and requirements
(Legal Steps)
GRANTING
• # of titles, # hectares formalized,
permits, authorizations, contracts
completed and registered
• Scenarios of tenure security at the
regional level
• South-South Exchanges
IMPACT/OUTCOMES
• Analysis at the
village/Household level
•Land/Forest tenure conditions
•Tenure security
•External threats
•Forest conditions
REFORM
PROCESS
A framework to analyze tenure reform processes
(2) Issues

11. Consultative & partnering—diverse actors with multiple roles and interests
Three interactive pillars:
• Research: comparative; diagnostic; good practice principles; indicators for
monitoring tenure security; tools/strategies for integrating multiple interests
• Multistakeholder engagement: joint problem solving; scenarios
development; experience sharing
• Knowledge sharing and capacity enhancement: workshops; needs
assessments; tools (e.g. conflict resolution; gender integration); tenure
literacy
Approach

12. Project Partners and Funders
Indonesia
• University of Pattimura
• University of Lampung
• Ministry of Forestry
Uganda
• Makerere University
• Associationof Uganda ProfessionalWomenin
Agriculture and Environment AUPWAE
• Forestry SectorSupportDepartment,Ministryof
Environmentand Water
Peru
• Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
• Ministry ofAgriculture,Rural Cadastre Office;National
ForestService

13. Innovation 1
The Participatory Prospective Analysis
(PPA) processes: Co-ellaboration of
Tenure Security Scenarios through
staekholder engagement

14. OUR APPROACH TO STUDY TENURE SECURITY: PROSPECTIVE
PARTICIPATORY ANALYSIS (PPA)
IDENTIFYING
FORCES
• Id Forces influencing the system
• Defining and measuring forces
IDENTIFYING
POSSIBLE FUTURES
• States of driving forces
• Identifying possible
scenarios
DEFINING AN
ACTION PLAN
• Strategy
FORCES DRIVING
(IN)SECURITY IN
COLLECTIVE LANDS
POSSIBLE FUTURES
ACTION PLAN

15. Tenure security is the
assurance of conditions
that allow communities to
live in their land and
benefit from it in the long
term.
Peru
DIFFERENT PERCEPTIONS OF WHAT IS TENURE SECURITY:
(Examples from Peru and Colombia)
Tenure security is the condition that
provides legal security and allows for
land use and management, through
the recognition
of autonomy, sustainable natural
resource use, organizational
strengthening and
cultural recognition.
Montes de Maria, Colombia

16. 3. Scenariosaddressing the
relationshipbetween the
community and the
government
POSSIBLE FUTURES AND CONTRASTING
SCENARIOS OF TENURE SECURITY
(PERU)
“ideal” “bad”
“when NGOs replace the government” “half way”
“paternalist government” “the community disappears”
1. Scenarios addressing the
state of the forests
2. Scenarios addressing the
state of the community

17. Action Plans:
Uganda

18. Innovation 2
Approaches to address implementation
gaps from the perspective of government
agents

19. Stage Number of steps
(Law)
Number of
government
agencies involved
(Law)
Number of steps
(Practice)
Number of
government
agencies involved
(Practice)
Legal recognition 8 4 11 7
Demarcation and
Titlinng
11 7 +22 +12
Usufruct contract 1 2 5 5
TOTAL 20 +7 38 +12
Source: Notess et al., 2018; Monterroso y Larson, 2018
3. Institutions and procedures for implementation,
mechanisms for coordinating
WHY INTERSECTORIAL COORDINATION/COMMUNICATION IS IMPORTANT?
• Ensures meeting outcomes (36%),
• Allows meeting goals (22%),
• Is part of the institutional mandate (19%).
Source: Notess et al., 2018; Monterroso y
Larson, 2018
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
si no no sabe
Is there a formal agreement to coordinate with other government
institutions involved in imnplemenntation of reform process?
yes no Doesn’tknow

21. From design to implementation:From the perspective of government
agents
Source: Myers et al., underreview
Rating of effectiveness of
coordination among implementing
agencies (N=126)
Efficacy of reform
implementation (N=143)

22. Innovation 3
South-South
Exchanges
• Purpose: Sharing experience, lessons learned and synergies acrossstudy countries
• Three events: World Forestry Congress(2016); World Bank Land Poverty Conference(2017); Field Visit
and Sub-nationalInternationalConferencein Madre de dios, Peru (2018)
• Outcomes: Multi-stakeholder policy dialogues; training events; cross-country exchangefield-visits;
review of theory of change, involvement of multi-stakeholder projectadvisory committees

23. IFAD ENGAGEMENT IN GCS-TENURE PROJECT:
Challenges and opportunities
• IFAD Project Management:
Program offices involved Land Tenure vs.
Forest/Environment
Opportunities to cross learning across IFAD topic desks
• IFAD Country context:
Example: IFAD country work in Peru focused outside
the lowlands-Amazon vs. GCS Tenure project
geographic and theme focus
Different situation in Uganda and Indonesia
Focus of country projects limit the opportunities of
engagement, establishment of synergies and cross-
learning.
• IFAD Mission field visit in Indonesia
•Lessons learned
•Engagement with country
projects at the inception
level is important but not
enough if the process is
not linked around the project
design​ (including topics
•More opportunities for cross
learning and engagement
along the implementation of
the project

24. https://www2.cifor.org/gcs-tenure/

25. Thank you
foreststreesagroforestry.org | globallandscapesforum.org | resilient-landscapes.org
cifor.org | worldagroforestry.org
The Center for International ForestryResearch (CIFOR) and World Agroforestry (ICRAF) envisiona more
equitableworld where trees in all landscapes, from drylands to the humid tropics, enhance the environment
and well-being for all. CIFOR and ICRAF are CGIAR Research Centers.