This presentation was delivered during the Course on Governance of Landscapes, Forests and People at the CIFOR Campus in Bogor, Indonesia.
It discusses: the reason public-private partnerships became an option; whether or not these partnerships are effective, trade-offs and challenges to consider; and how to ensure the effectiveness public-private partnerships at the landscape level.
Smallholder and community forest management in the tropics: what we know and ...CIFOR-ICRAF
Communities now own or manage a quarter of the world’s tropical forests, but the case studies in this presentation illustrate the many key challenges remaining for smallholder and community forest management in the tropics. For example, the customary rights of smallholders and communities are still not properly recognised; there are discrepancies between the law and the reality in forest management and use; and there are difficulties in linking communities to markets.
CIFOR scientist Amy Duchelle explains how the smallholder and community forest management model came about, and where we need to go next. She gave this presentation on 16 June 2012 as part of the Forest Stewardship Council’s side event at Rio+20. She was answering the topic “Focussing on smallholders and forest communities: achievements and challenges at the local level”.
Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+)Janathakshan Gte Ltd
Presentation by Mr. Mr. Anura Sathurusinghe, CGF, Sri Lanka Forest Department
and Raushan Kumar
Technical Session 01: Climate Change Mitigation
Experience Sharing Forum on Climate Smart Initiatives of Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka Next – A blue Green Era – Conference and Exhibition 2017
16 – 17 October 2017, BMICH, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Community forestry. Where and why has devolution of forest rights contributed...IFPRI-PIM
Presentation for the webinar organized by the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (www.pim.cgiar.org) on August 29, 2017. Steven Lawry, Director of Equity, Gender and Tenure research program at Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) summarized findings of selected meta-analyses, presented case studies from Nepal, Guatemala, and Mexico, and previewed emerging research looking at the investment effects of community forestry models that feature strong elements of forest rights devolution.
REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation)Janathakshan Gte Ltd
The presentation prepared by Janathakshan on REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) initiative in Sri Lanka. SL became a UN-REDD partner country in 2009. Government fo Sri Lanka (GoSL) through the forest department (FD), department of wildlife conservation (DWC) and the CCS with many stakeholders and support of 3 UN organisations has jointly implemented a UN-REDD National Program (2013 to 2017).
Smallholder and community forest management in the tropics: what we know and ...CIFOR-ICRAF
Communities now own or manage a quarter of the world’s tropical forests, but the case studies in this presentation illustrate the many key challenges remaining for smallholder and community forest management in the tropics. For example, the customary rights of smallholders and communities are still not properly recognised; there are discrepancies between the law and the reality in forest management and use; and there are difficulties in linking communities to markets.
CIFOR scientist Amy Duchelle explains how the smallholder and community forest management model came about, and where we need to go next. She gave this presentation on 16 June 2012 as part of the Forest Stewardship Council’s side event at Rio+20. She was answering the topic “Focussing on smallholders and forest communities: achievements and challenges at the local level”.
Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+)Janathakshan Gte Ltd
Presentation by Mr. Mr. Anura Sathurusinghe, CGF, Sri Lanka Forest Department
and Raushan Kumar
Technical Session 01: Climate Change Mitigation
Experience Sharing Forum on Climate Smart Initiatives of Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka Next – A blue Green Era – Conference and Exhibition 2017
16 – 17 October 2017, BMICH, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Community forestry. Where and why has devolution of forest rights contributed...IFPRI-PIM
Presentation for the webinar organized by the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (www.pim.cgiar.org) on August 29, 2017. Steven Lawry, Director of Equity, Gender and Tenure research program at Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) summarized findings of selected meta-analyses, presented case studies from Nepal, Guatemala, and Mexico, and previewed emerging research looking at the investment effects of community forestry models that feature strong elements of forest rights devolution.
REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation)Janathakshan Gte Ltd
The presentation prepared by Janathakshan on REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) initiative in Sri Lanka. SL became a UN-REDD partner country in 2009. Government fo Sri Lanka (GoSL) through the forest department (FD), department of wildlife conservation (DWC) and the CCS with many stakeholders and support of 3 UN organisations has jointly implemented a UN-REDD National Program (2013 to 2017).
SWaRMA_IRBM_Module1_#3, Upstream-Downstream linkages and Multi-scale IRBM, Sa...ICIMOD
This presentation is the part of 12-day (28 January–8 February 2019) training workshop on “Multi-scale Integrated River Basin Management (IRBM) from the Hindu Kush Himalayan Perspective” organized by the Strengthening Water Resources Management in Afghanistan (SWaRMA) Initiative of the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), and targeted at participants from Afghanistan.
Forests, Climate Change and REDD+: A brief introductionCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Maria Brockhaus at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable REDD+ carbon and non-carbon results', held from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Sustainable land management to mitigate and adapt to climate changeExternalEvents
This presentation was presented during the 1 Parallel session on Theme 2, Maintaining and/or increasing SOC stocks for climate change mitigation and adaptation and Land Degradation Neutrality, of the Global Symposium on Soil Organic Carbon that took place in Rome 21-23 March 2017. The presentation was made by Ms. Maria José Sanz Sanchez, from Basque Centre for Climate Change - Spain, in FAO Hq, Rome
Traditional knowledge in climate smart agriculturejayanta thokdar
Traditional knowledge is unique to a given culture or society which established over time. It is techniques or practices which is well knitted with customs, traditions and beliefs in rural life. Mainly rural people or tribal are main custodian of this traditional knowledge. The traditional knowledge or practices are found to be socially desirable, economically affordable, sustainable, and involve minimum risk to rural farmers and producers. This knowledge is evolved over time periods so it offers a climate resiliency. The knowledge is also based on their belief and customs, so it is location specific and acceptable. As modern science or approaches are not well suited to many rural or remote locations, there integration between these two knowledge may provide better understanding and result. Modern approaches are resource exploitable however it is widely believed that traditional practices try to conserve resources. It provides basis for problem solving strategies for local communities. CSA identifies agricultural strategies suitable to local conditions for sustainable food production under climate change scenario.
Operationalizing landscape approach in Indonesia: The socio-economic perspect...CIFOR-ICRAF
By Ani Adiwinata Nawir, PhD
SLF –Sustainable Landscape & Food System Team, CIFOR
JFCC Panel Discussion on Indonesia and its environmental record, 28 November 2016, Inter-Continental Hotel Midplaza, Jakarta
SWaRMA_IRBM_Module1_#3, Upstream-Downstream linkages and Multi-scale IRBM, Sa...ICIMOD
This presentation is the part of 12-day (28 January–8 February 2019) training workshop on “Multi-scale Integrated River Basin Management (IRBM) from the Hindu Kush Himalayan Perspective” organized by the Strengthening Water Resources Management in Afghanistan (SWaRMA) Initiative of the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), and targeted at participants from Afghanistan.
Forests, Climate Change and REDD+: A brief introductionCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Maria Brockhaus at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable REDD+ carbon and non-carbon results', held from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
Sustainable land management to mitigate and adapt to climate changeExternalEvents
This presentation was presented during the 1 Parallel session on Theme 2, Maintaining and/or increasing SOC stocks for climate change mitigation and adaptation and Land Degradation Neutrality, of the Global Symposium on Soil Organic Carbon that took place in Rome 21-23 March 2017. The presentation was made by Ms. Maria José Sanz Sanchez, from Basque Centre for Climate Change - Spain, in FAO Hq, Rome
Traditional knowledge in climate smart agriculturejayanta thokdar
Traditional knowledge is unique to a given culture or society which established over time. It is techniques or practices which is well knitted with customs, traditions and beliefs in rural life. Mainly rural people or tribal are main custodian of this traditional knowledge. The traditional knowledge or practices are found to be socially desirable, economically affordable, sustainable, and involve minimum risk to rural farmers and producers. This knowledge is evolved over time periods so it offers a climate resiliency. The knowledge is also based on their belief and customs, so it is location specific and acceptable. As modern science or approaches are not well suited to many rural or remote locations, there integration between these two knowledge may provide better understanding and result. Modern approaches are resource exploitable however it is widely believed that traditional practices try to conserve resources. It provides basis for problem solving strategies for local communities. CSA identifies agricultural strategies suitable to local conditions for sustainable food production under climate change scenario.
Operationalizing landscape approach in Indonesia: The socio-economic perspect...CIFOR-ICRAF
By Ani Adiwinata Nawir, PhD
SLF –Sustainable Landscape & Food System Team, CIFOR
JFCC Panel Discussion on Indonesia and its environmental record, 28 November 2016, Inter-Continental Hotel Midplaza, Jakarta
This presentation is a compilation of four that were given on 30 November 2011 at an official UNFCCC COP17 side-event organised by CIFOR: 'How is REDD+ unfolding on the ground?'. The event discussed early insights on the capability of REDD+ projects to deliver on their goal of sequestering forest carbon while providing a range of co-benefits. The information presented draws mainly on findings of CIFOR's Global Comparative Study on REDD+, and covers the status and challenges of REDD+ projects on the ground;
challenges encountered in establishing REDD+ in Africa;
the policy and economic context in which REDD+ projects is unfolding; and
the status of monitoring, reporting and verification in setting up REDD+.
The co-occurrence of two major African forests management processes such as REDD+ and FLEGT raised hopes in the civil society and especially the Africa Community Rights Network (ARCN), that legality and governance could be enhanced in their forests. ARCN’s priorities were to use these processes to secure gains for forest dependent communities by:
- Securing their land and customary rights,
- Better sharing benefits derived from forests,
- Empowering them to manage forests at community level,
- And ensuring their right to free, prior and informed consent to any activity affecting them.
Ten years after the adoption of the FLEGT action plan and five years after the launch of REDD+, the situation is rather worrying, the political will which led to the signing of the various
VPAs has disappeared at the time of implementation, and negotiations on climate have resulted in a succession of disappointments.
This study nevertheless points to some notable progress, especially the unprecedented participation of the civil society in decisions resulting from VPA negotiations in many countries.
This therefore confirms a clear potential of the VPAs to improve governance, reduce malpractices and unlawfulness, provide opportunity for new rights. However, this study calls for greater realism of the civil society in its commitment. Its participation in negotiations, then in implementation, is hampered by the reluctance of governments, obviously anxious to keep as much as possible their ‘business as usual’, so the direct participation of communities remains the exception rather than the rule.
Progress through this commitment is limited, and rarely has changed the rules on land ownership, FPIC or the respect for customary rights. Finally, the implementation of these commitments, however limited they may be, remains to be seen, while abuse, unlawfulness and the acquisition of largescale land and forest still continue. The situation is even
more worrying for, REDD+, with a more limited participation and
few signs of progress to come to enhance community land and forest rights.
The main lesson thus remains that civil society participation is still the mother of all battles for community rights, the only way to open the door to real progress.
This observation calls on ACRN members to
continue their efforts to ensure that all commitments under the VPAs are implemented.
Regarding REDD+, a process of this magnitude and with such potential impact on local and indigenous communities cannot continue without a real participation of all forest management stakeholders, including forest communities and civil society.
Without a radical change of the trends observed so far in most countries of the network, ACRN members could raise again the issue of their willingness to legitimize a process by participating in it, on the basis of the minimum criteria they themselves defined to engage their participation in a national or international process.
Community forestry and certification: Dealing with interfaces between global ...CIFOR-ICRAF
K. Freerk Wiersum, Shoana S. Humphries and Severine van Bommel
Presentation for the conference on
Taking stock of smallholders and community forestry
Montpellier France
March 24-26, 2010
Ebaa Atyi Community Forest Management in Central Africa 020424.pdfVerina Ingram
Community forests management in central Africa, progress and challenges - Richard Ebba Atyi, CIFOR-IRCAF
Community forestry enterprises in the Congo Basin
Seminar
Chaired by Verina Ingram & Serge Piabou (Wagenignen UR)
10.00 -13.00 2 April 2024
NCountR Room, Impulse, Wageningen CMAPUS & online
doctoral Defense Serge Piabuo
“Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) as successful social enterprises: Empirical Evidence from Cameroon”
16.00 – 17.30 2 April 2024
Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen campus & online
Link to recording
https://wur-educationsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/111045/l/1595365-about-recording-and-livestreaming-a-promotion-phd-defence-graduation-ceremony-inauguration-farewell-speech-or-other-public-events#where-can-i-watch-the-livestream
Assessing REDD+ Benefit Sharing for Efficiency, Effectiveness and EquityCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Grace Wong, Cecilia Luttrell, Lasse Loft, Anastasia Yang, Maria Brockhaus, Shintia Arwida, Januarti Tjajadi, Pham Thu Thuy and Samuel Assembe-Mvondo at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable carbon and non-carbon results' from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
REDD+ social safeguards in Indonesia: Opportunities and challengesCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Nining Liswanti (Researcher, CIFOR-ICRAF) at "Global Comparative Study on REDD+ Workshop: REDD+ social safeguards in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges", on 16 May 2023
Benefits, burdens and solutions to Indonesian Peatland FiresCIFOR-ICRAF
Peatland fires have burned annually in Indonesia since the 1990s, and they come with significant costs between multiple stakeholders. There perceptions might help build a bridge to a solution.
Global Comparative Study on REDD+: Inputs for ASEAN regionCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Sandy Nofyanza (CIFOR-ICRAF) at "21st ASOF International Seminar on Current International Issues Affecting Forestry and Forest Products: Scaling up Nature-based Solutions and REDD+ Implementation in ASEAN Region" on 14 June 2023
Discussions for agreement on the specific details for the expansion of Agoro ...Dr. Joshua Zake
This presentation was prepared and delivered for discussions during the District Level Stakeholders Meeting for Agoro-Agu Landscape Platform Expansion, which was organized by the International Union for conservation of Nature on 6th June 2019. It highlighted key considerations for reflection to inform establishment of the platform in terms of focus and governance structures.
Financing FLR: Governance and funding opportunities for landscape management ...Etifor srl
Presentation by Etifor at the workshop Maich Chania organised in the context of the Mediterre3 project. The project is supported by the European Climate Initiative (EUKI)
Mejorando la estimación de emisiones GEI conversión bosque degradado a planta...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Kristell Hergoualc'h (Scientist, CIFOR-ICRAF) at Workshop “Lecciones para el monitoreo transparente: Experiencias de la Amazonia peruana” on 7 Mei 2024 in Lima, Peru.
Inclusión y transparencia como clave del éxito para el mecanismo de transfere...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Lauren Cooper and Rowenn Kalman (Michigan State University) at Workshop “Lecciones para el monitoreo transparente: Experiencias de la Amazonia peruana” on 7 Mei 2024 in Lima, Peru.
Avances de Perú con relación al marco de transparencia del Acuerdo de ParísCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Berioska Quispe Estrada (Directora General de Cambio Climático y Desertificación) at Workshop “Lecciones para el monitoreo transparente: Experiencias de la Amazonia peruana” on 7 Mei 2024 in Lima, Peru.
Land tenure and forest landscape restoration in Cameroon and MadagascarCIFOR-ICRAF
FLR is an adaptive process that brings people (including women, men, youth, local and indigenous communities) together to identify, negotiate and implement practices that restore and enhance ecological and social functionality of forest landscapes that have been deforested or degraded.
ReSI-NoC - Strategie de mise en oeuvre.pdfCIFOR-ICRAF
Re nforcer les S ystèmes d’ I nnovations
agrosylvopastorales économiquement
rentables, écologiquement durables et
socialement équitables dans la région du
No rd C ameroun
ReSI-NoC: Introduction au contexte du projetCIFOR-ICRAF
Renforcer les systèmes d’innovation agricole en vue de
promouvoir des systèmes de production agricole et
d’élevage économiquement rentables, écologiquement
durables et socialement équitables dans la région du
Nord au Cameroun (ReSI-NoC)
Renforcer les Systèmes d’Innovations agrosylvopastorales économiquement renta...CIFOR-ICRAF
Renforcer les Systèmes d’Innovations agrosylvopastorales économiquement rentables, écologiquement durables et socialement équitables dans la région du
Nord Cameroun
Introducing Blue Carbon Deck seeking for actionable partnershipsCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Daniel Murdiyarso (Principal Scientist, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
A Wide Range of Eco System Services with MangrovesCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Mihyun Seol and Himlal Baral (CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Presented by Citra Gilang (Research Consultant, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Peat land Restoration Project in HLG LonderangCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Hyoung Gyun Kim (Korea–Indonesia Forest Cooperation Center) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Sungsang Mangrove Restoration and Ecotourism (SMART): A participatory action ...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Beni Okarda (Senior Research Officer, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Coastal and mangrove vulnerability assessment In the Northern Coast of Java, ...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Phidju Marrin Sagala (Research Consultant, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Carbon Stock Assessment in Banten Province and Demak, Central Java, IndonesiaCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Milkah Royna (Student Intern, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Cooperative Mangrove Project: Introduction, Scope, and PerspectivesCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Bora Lee (Warm-Temperate and Subtropical Forest Research Center, NIFoS Jeju, Republic of Korea) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Micro RNA genes and their likely influence in rice (Oryza sativa L.) dynamic ...Open Access Research Paper
Micro RNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs molecules having approximately 18-25 nucleotides, they are present in both plants and animals genomes. MiRNAs have diverse spatial expression patterns and regulate various developmental metabolisms, stress responses and other physiological processes. The dynamic gene expression playing major roles in phenotypic differences in organisms are believed to be controlled by miRNAs. Mutations in regions of regulatory factors, such as miRNA genes or transcription factors (TF) necessitated by dynamic environmental factors or pathogen infections, have tremendous effects on structure and expression of genes. The resultant novel gene products presents potential explanations for constant evolving desirable traits that have long been bred using conventional means, biotechnology or genetic engineering. Rice grain quality, yield, disease tolerance, climate-resilience and palatability properties are not exceptional to miRN Asmutations effects. There are new insights courtesy of high-throughput sequencing and improved proteomic techniques that organisms’ complexity and adaptations are highly contributed by miRNAs containing regulatory networks. This article aims to expound on how rice miRNAs could be driving evolution of traits and highlight the latest miRNA research progress. Moreover, the review accentuates miRNAs grey areas to be addressed and gives recommendations for further studies.
"Understanding the Carbon Cycle: Processes, Human Impacts, and Strategies for...MMariSelvam4
The carbon cycle is a critical component of Earth's environmental system, governing the movement and transformation of carbon through various reservoirs, including the atmosphere, oceans, soil, and living organisms. This complex cycle involves several key processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, decomposition, and carbon sequestration, each contributing to the regulation of carbon levels on the planet.
Human activities, particularly fossil fuel combustion and deforestation, have significantly altered the natural carbon cycle, leading to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and driving climate change. Understanding the intricacies of the carbon cycle is essential for assessing the impacts of these changes and developing effective mitigation strategies.
By studying the carbon cycle, scientists can identify carbon sources and sinks, measure carbon fluxes, and predict future trends. This knowledge is crucial for crafting policies aimed at reducing carbon emissions, enhancing carbon storage, and promoting sustainable practices. The carbon cycle's interplay with climate systems, ecosystems, and human activities underscores its importance in maintaining a stable and healthy planet.
In-depth exploration of the carbon cycle reveals the delicate balance required to sustain life and the urgent need to address anthropogenic influences. Through research, education, and policy, we can work towards restoring equilibrium in the carbon cycle and ensuring a sustainable future for generations to come.
Willie Nelson Net Worth: A Journey Through Music, Movies, and Business Venturesgreendigital
Willie Nelson is a name that resonates within the world of music and entertainment. Known for his unique voice, and masterful guitar skills. and an extraordinary career spanning several decades. Nelson has become a legend in the country music scene. But, his influence extends far beyond the realm of music. with ventures in acting, writing, activism, and business. This comprehensive article delves into Willie Nelson net worth. exploring the various facets of his career that have contributed to his large fortune.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Willie Nelson net worth is a testament to his enduring influence and success in many fields. Born on April 29, 1933, in Abbott, Texas. Nelson's journey from a humble beginning to becoming one of the most iconic figures in American music is nothing short of inspirational. His net worth, which estimated to be around $25 million as of 2024. reflects a career that is as diverse as it is prolific.
Early Life and Musical Beginnings
Humble Origins
Willie Hugh Nelson was born during the Great Depression. a time of significant economic hardship in the United States. Raised by his grandparents. Nelson found solace and inspiration in music from an early age. His grandmother taught him to play the guitar. setting the stage for what would become an illustrious career.
First Steps in Music
Nelson's initial foray into the music industry was fraught with challenges. He moved to Nashville, Tennessee, to pursue his dreams, but success did not come . Working as a songwriter, Nelson penned hits for other artists. which helped him gain a foothold in the competitive music scene. His songwriting skills contributed to his early earnings. laying the foundation for his net worth.
Rise to Stardom
Breakthrough Albums
The 1970s marked a turning point in Willie Nelson's career. His albums "Shotgun Willie" (1973), "Red Headed Stranger" (1975). and "Stardust" (1978) received critical acclaim and commercial success. These albums not only solidified his position in the country music genre. but also introduced his music to a broader audience. The success of these albums played a crucial role in boosting Willie Nelson net worth.
Iconic Songs
Willie Nelson net worth is also attributed to his extensive catalog of hit songs. Tracks like "Blue Eyes Crying in the Rain," "On the Road Again," and "Always on My Mind" have become timeless classics. These songs have not only earned Nelson large royalties but have also ensured his continued relevance in the music industry.
Acting and Film Career
Hollywood Ventures
In addition to his music career, Willie Nelson has also made a mark in Hollywood. His distinctive personality and on-screen presence have landed him roles in several films and television shows. Notable appearances include roles in "The Electric Horseman" (1979), "Honeysuckle Rose" (1980), and "Barbarosa" (1982). These acting gigs have added a significant amount to Willie Nelson net worth.
Television Appearances
Nelson's char
UNDERSTANDING WHAT GREEN WASHING IS!.pdfJulietMogola
Many companies today use green washing to lure the public into thinking they are conserving the environment but in real sense they are doing more harm. There have been such several cases from very big companies here in Kenya and also globally. This ranges from various sectors from manufacturing and goes to consumer products. Educating people on greenwashing will enable people to make better choices based on their analysis and not on what they see on marketing sites.
Natural farming @ Dr. Siddhartha S. Jena.pptxsidjena70
A brief about organic farming/ Natural farming/ Zero budget natural farming/ Subash Palekar Natural farming which keeps us and environment safe and healthy. Next gen Agricultural practices of chemical free farming.
Artificial Reefs by Kuddle Life Foundation - May 2024punit537210
Situated in Pondicherry, India, Kuddle Life Foundation is a charitable, non-profit and non-governmental organization (NGO) dedicated to improving the living standards of coastal communities and simultaneously placing a strong emphasis on the protection of marine ecosystems.
One of the key areas we work in is Artificial Reefs. This presentation captures our journey so far and our learnings. We hope you get as excited about marine conservation and artificial reefs as we are.
Please visit our website: https://kuddlelife.org
Our Instagram channel:
@kuddlelifefoundation
Our Linkedin Page:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/kuddlelifefoundation/
and write to us if you have any questions:
info@kuddlelife.org
WRI’s brand new “Food Service Playbook for Promoting Sustainable Food Choices” gives food service operators the very latest strategies for creating dining environments that empower consumers to choose sustainable, plant-rich dishes. This research builds off our first guide for food service, now with industry experience and insights from nearly 350 academic trials.
Diabetes is a rapidly and serious health problem in Pakistan. This chronic condition is associated with serious long-term complications, including higher risk of heart disease and stroke. Aggressive treatment of hypertension and hyperlipideamia can result in a substantial reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes 1. Consequently pharmacist-led diabetes cardiovascular risk (DCVR) clinics have been established in both primary and secondary care sites in NHS Lothian during the past five years. An audit of the pharmaceutical care delivery at the clinics was conducted in order to evaluate practice and to standardize the pharmacists’ documentation of outcomes. Pharmaceutical care issues (PCI) and patient details were collected both prospectively and retrospectively from three DCVR clinics. The PCI`s were categorized according to a triangularised system consisting of multiple categories. These were ‘checks’, ‘changes’ (‘change in drug therapy process’ and ‘change in drug therapy’), ‘drug therapy problems’ and ‘quality assurance descriptors’ (‘timer perspective’ and ‘degree of change’). A verified medication assessment tool (MAT) for patients with chronic cardiovascular disease was applied to the patients from one of the clinics. The tool was used to quantify PCI`s and pharmacist actions that were centered on implementing or enforcing clinical guideline standards. A database was developed to be used as an assessment tool and to standardize the documentation of achievement of outcomes. Feedback on the audit of the pharmaceutical care delivery and the database was received from the DCVR clinic pharmacist at a focus group meeting.
Summary of the Climate and Energy Policy of Australia
Public private partnership in forestry management
1. Ani Adiwinata Nawir (CIFOR) presentation in
‘Course on Governance of Landscapes, Forests and People’
(Amazon Room, CIFOR Campus Bogor, 27 August 2015)
This PPT is protected by CIFOR Intellectual Property Right Policy,
proper citation is required for any use(s) partially or all of the information provided here
2. Public-Private Partnership in Forestry Management:
Case of partnership scheme in forestry management
in Indonesia
Ani Adiwinata Nawir, PhD
Socioeconomics Scientist, Forests and Livelihoods Research (LIV Portfolio)
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
Presented in Course on Governance of Landscapes, Forests and People
Amazon Room, CIFOR Campus Bogor, 27 August, 2014
3. Scope of presentation:
1. Public-Private Partnership (PPP) –
some understandings
2. Why does Public-Private Partnership
Scheme become an option?
3. Effectiveness of the partnership
4. Trade-offs & challenges to consider
5. Ensuring the effectiveness of
public-private partnership
at the landscape level
4. 1. Public-Private Partnership (PPP) – some understandings
1. There is no overarching definition for public-private partnerships:
PPP is an umbrella notion covering a wide range of economic activity and
is in constant evolution
(Source: Speech by Commissioner Frits Bolkenstein, DG Internal Market)
2. PPP is the private sector’s involvement in developing/managing facilities &
services for the economy & society to function (Yescombe, 2007)
3. Such partnerships are characterized by the sharing of investment, risk,
responsibility and reward between the partners.
4. PPP ≈ Privatization
5. More common in infrastructure development (e.g. roads, public water
facilities)
6. Less developed in natural resources management (including forests)
5. TFA 2020 was catalyzed by The Consumer Goods Forum (CGF) commitment to mobilize
resources within their respective businesses to help achieve zero net deforestation by 2020.
TFA 2020 is engaging with governments around the world, a range of civil society organizations
active in both producer and consumer nations, smallholder farmers and indigenous
representatives and multinational corporations (Source:http://www.tfa2020.com/index.php/about-tfa2020)
Other initiatives: Responsible Business Forum, & TEEB Business Coalition
Example:
Tropical Forest Alliance
(TFA)
New Buzzwords: Public-Private-People Partnership
Source: Presentation at Tropical Landscape Summit by Felipe Calderon–Former President of Mexico and Chair, Global Commission of the Economy and the Climate, 2015
7. One of the strategy for forestry
plantation development
Alternative mechanism to
acknowledge community rights
Access to benefits transferred
from commercialised forestry
management based on
contract with clear
responsibilities and rights
Cooperative
Alternative to:
resolving conflicts
securing wood supply
strategy for risk management
Company
State
Contract agreement
8. 2. Why does Public-Private Partnership Scheme become an option?
(1) An alternative approach in CF responding to governance failures
in forest management
9. Negative
ecological impacts &
socioeconomic
benefits disparity:
local community
& industry
Sharp increases
in fuel prices
Sustainable development
paradigm and the
Sustainable Livelihoods
Approach (SLA)
Common Property
Resource Management
Regime
Collaborative
management
concept
Decentralisation &
devolution policies
Economic globalization
through trade
liberalisation
‘Forest for people’
Objectives:
Releasing the pressures
on natural forests and
meeting the peoples’
subsistence needs
Focused on
afforestation programs
The balance between
conservation &
development objectives
for sustainable forest
management
Focussed on livelihood
strategies
Shift from passive to active participation:
combining collaborative and adaptive management
Management principles have
not been robust enough to
face new challenges:
economic globalization
Collective actions through
collaborative management (co-
management)
Diversity of income generation options:
Payment for Environmental Services (PES) & REDD
Keydriversinfluencing
theevolvingapproaches
Evolvingapproaches
1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s - presentPeriods
Climate Change &
REDD+ Regimes
10. Implemented in various forms to involve community
Management
of forestry
resources
Types of control or ownership of resources
Private Communal State
Communal
Private lands organised by
community institutions
Communal on
community lands
State land allocated
for community-based forestry
projects
(e.g. reforestation projects)
Private
Privately managed forests
around households
(e.g. farm forestry)
Privately-managed on
community lands
(e.g. Customary land in
Borneo: tembawang)
Public land allocation schemes
to be individually managed
Co-management
Co-management on
privately-owned lands
(e.g. outgrower schemes)
Co-management on
communal lands
(e.g. Joint Forest
Management)
State lands allocated to
community group
(e.g. CBFM in Nepal & the
Philippines)
11. 2. Why does Public-Private Partnership Scheme become an option?
(2) As an approach in conflict resolution
13. The dynamics of tenurial conditions behind
the partnership scheme initiatives (case of Indonesia)
Company right: state-nested system
Community partner:
Company-nested system
14. Commercialization: towards more market-oriented production
processes
Globalization: a close association between ‘global’ and ‘local’ or
‘glocalization’ (Robertson,1995 in Haan, 2000)
Promoted as a way to reduce poverty by
creating new niche markets and potential buyers of scarce
forest products: multilateral agreements – AFTA, NAFTA
2. Why does Public-Private Partnership Scheme become an option?:
(3) Empowering (community bargaining power) in facing challenges under
globalized and commercialized economics - so can benefit
local communities
15. Direct and indirect land use changes driven by foreign companies’
investments in agricultural and forestry plantations:
Moratorium in Indonesia: Oil palm companies look for lands in new regions
Source: Nawir et al., 2011
16. CF management principles have not been robust enough
to face the new challenges coming from trade liberalisation
The slow pace of development for community empowerment,
communities involved in CF do not have:
adequate management and financial capacity
the business knowledge and skills required to deal with
international investors and traders
Impacts of globalisation & trade liberalisation – which partnership with
company might be crucial
local products cannot compete with imported mass-produced
products
a drop in prices and profits received by local producers;
increased pressure on forests:
they have to switch to unsustainable practices to compensate
the decreasing returns from the drop in price and profits
17. Bundle of rights Ownership position
Owner Proprietor Claimant Authorised user Authorised entrant
Access √ √ √ √ √
Withdrawal √ √ √ √
Management √ √ √ √
Exclusion √ √
Alienation √
State forests Public-Private
Partnership
Scheme
Common cases
3. Effectiveness of the partnership: Bundle of rights
18. Collaborative arrangements Relevant schemes
1.
A pure state-nested system, with the community rights granted
directly by the state
Community-based forest
management schemes
inside state forests
2.
Company is part of a state-nested system and community is one
layer down, embedded in rights granted for the company
Community-company
partnership scheme inside
state forests
3.
An exchange system between company and community
Community-company
partnership scheme on
household-owned lands
(outside state forests)
Notes: S-State, Comp-Company, and C-Community.
Sources: Analysed from case studies using the framework adapted from Carlsson and Berkes (2005).
S C
S
C
Possible co-arrangements under partnerships
19. Categories of land status Requirements and implications for rights assurance
1. Communal land belongs to the
village (including adat lands,
but not tembawang b)
• Community members respect the land status as required by
adat or customary rules
• May not be administered within the land status categories
according to state law
2. Individually-owned land based
on paper from the Head of
Village on land status or SKT-
Surat Keterangan Tanah
• Approved by the Head of the Village and respected by
communities in neighbouring villages
• Can be upgraded to obtain land certificate from the office of
National Land Agency (BPN – Badan Pertanahan Nasional)
at provincial level
3. Individually-owned land based
on paper from the Head of
Dusun (sub-village) or SPH-
Surat Pengakuan Hak
• Approved by the Head of Dusun (sub-village) and may be
respected between villages
• May be upgraded to obtain land certificate with additional
administration procedures
4. Individually-owned land based
on land certificate
• Legalised land status and approved by all levels of
government authorities
• Respected by all parties
5. Paper on right over
transmigration areas
• Secured land status under government
resettlement/transmigration program
• Respected by all parties
Challenges for effective bundle of rights:
a range of land status affecting the rights assurance
(Case of Indonesia)
20. Introducing the programme
Ground survey & land delineation
Communities submit the proposal to company
Verifying the status of land legality
Signing the contract agreement
Implementation
(Land preparation, planting, maintenance & thinning)
Feasibility study
Processes in partnership development: important in clarifying land boundaries
Clarifying land
boundaries
21. Contractual agreement: rights & responsibilities
(Case of partnership scheme in forestry plantation mgm, Indonesia)
Companies Communities (as a group)
Responsible for managing lands and
plantation, including paying expenses
for land clearing, planting, and
maintaining plantations
• To form a Forest Farmer Co-operative
• Co-operative members bounded by a contract
agreement
• Will not prevent company from having access to the
areas managed under partnership schemes
Companies Communities (as a group)
• Has full rights and access over the
land under the period of contract
• Right to harvest planted trees
• Decide the royalty under benefit-
sharing agreement
• First priority to be employed as a labourer
• Receiving incentives: land value & infrastructure
• Royalty paid to community partners based on total
volume or weight of timber harvested, varies based
on distance and type of land)
• Benefit from community development programs:
rubber, agroforestry, native species, & credit facilities
Responsibilities
Rights
23. Comparison of the proportions of the different cost components:
partnership scheme and industrial plantation (BAU) – Case of Indonesia
Cost components
Proportion of cost
Partnership schemes
Industrial plantation
A B
1. Investment 17% 23% 22%
2. Plantation development costs 11% 51% 59%
3. Timber harvesting and transporting 7% 1% 1%
4. Overhead 37% 23% 17%
5. Transaction costs 29% 2%
-
Total 100% 100% 100%
File: Compilation Jambi & Sanggau 220611.xls - Comparison Kemitraan & HTI (2)
24. Example of high transaction costs:
Requirements for harvesting & transporting timber applied to
partnership schemes ≈ industrial plantations
Transit logyard/logpond
Logs landing Logyard/logpondFelling
compartment
Concession areas
FA-FKB
FA-FKB
FA-FKB
DKB-FA
(Logs inspection &
verification
register)
PSDH
Payment
LHP
(Felling
report)
FA-FKB
RKT
(Annual
Work plan)
LHC
(Timber
cruising
report)
Wood based primary industry
25. 5. Ensuring the effectiveness of public-private partnership at the
landscape level:
(1) Identifying & dealing with the complexities of problems
26. Upstream forests:
honey trees (Boan:Tetramales nudiflora)
Downstream area:
City of Sumbawa
Sumbawa
island
Conserving watersheds: upstream forests
Main program of FMU in eastern Indonesia (Sumbawa) - 32,776 Ha
(Limited production forest – 55%, production forest – 23%, protected forest – 22%)
Main
watersheds
27. (1) Managing
protected forest while
enhancing livelihoods
(4) Rehabilitating degraded area
while enhancing livelihoods
District capital city:
Sumbawa Besar
(3) Illegal logging in state-own
company rehabilitated forests
(2) Forest encroachment
28. (2) Dealing with competition with other investment alternative,
such as oil palm plantations developed under partnership scheme
29. Tree growing partnership schemes Oil palm plantation partnership schemes
Sources of vulnerability for land owners:
Low productivity and quantity harvested
Timber buying prices are set under market price
Fires – partnership scheme can reduce the risks
Theft (illegal logging in planted acacia)
Sources of vulnerability for land owners:
High risk of losing the land partially
International price fluctuations
Too many brokers/middle-men
Improper post-harvesting treatment - low buying
price
Over-repayment of credit by land owners due
lack of transparency mechanism for records on
paid credit
Companies also bear some risks due to:
Paying high transaction costs
Abandoned tree grower commitments - due to
more interesting economic options
Social conflicts hit timber plantation companies
harder than oil palm companies
Companies also bear some risks due to:
Paying high transaction costs
International price fluctuations & boycott by
international consumers
Increasingly low quality of products – no
company assistance, mainly after credit
payments finish
Risks should be communicated to prospective community partners
30. Household income portfolio
Timber uses & trading
Privately-
owned lands
Protected forests
or nature reserve
Domesticated NTFPs:
e.g. candle nuts
Policy regulating access
to utilize the forests
(Limited) extractive
NTFPs: honey
Timber
management permit
Verifying timber legality
NTFPs Processing & Market
Timber processing & marketing
Transporting timber
Transporting NTFPs
Regulated locally based
national policy
Customary norms
& rules
Regulated locally
based national policy
(3) Effectiveness at the landscape level: opportunities for scaling-up
Integrated along the supply chain (production, marketing & processing
31. (4) Ensuring the effectiveness at the landscape level:
A framework for strengthening policy and economic incentives
(Case of community-company partnership scheme for timber
plantation development in Indonesia)