IPM 2009 presentation. The Performance Measurement Baseline is the collection of the Cost, Schedule, and Technical Performance Measures for the program - used to make management decisions.
Building a Credible Performance Measurement BaselineGlen Alleman
Establishing a credible Performance Measurement Baseline, with a risk adjusted Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule, starts with the WBS and connects Technical Measures of progress to Earned Value
Establishing the performance measurement baseline (v4) Glen Alleman
The Performance Measurement Baseline is the "anchor" of any successful project. It tells the story of what is being developed, how much it will cost, when the work will be performances, and when the deliverables - that produce the value of the project - will be available for use
Establishing the performance measurement baseline (pmi northern utah)(v1)Glen Alleman
The Performance Measurement Baseline is a time phase, budgeted description of all the work on a project to produce the needed capabilities that fulfill the business case or accomplish the mission
Project driven organization require lifecycle management to successfully deliver value to those paying for the outcomes of the project effort. This involves processes and data for Executive processes, Enterprise Governance, Program Management Office activities, Applications that enable the delivery of value, and overarching processes and data.
Recent College of Performance Management Webinar on using Technical Performance to inform Earned Value Management. Six steps to building a credible Performance Measurement Baseline to connect the dots between all the elements of the program
Building a Credible Performance Measurement BaselineGlen Alleman
Establishing a credible Performance Measurement Baseline, with a risk adjusted Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule, starts with the WBS and connects Technical Measures of progress to Earned Value
Establishing the performance measurement baseline (v4) Glen Alleman
The Performance Measurement Baseline is the "anchor" of any successful project. It tells the story of what is being developed, how much it will cost, when the work will be performances, and when the deliverables - that produce the value of the project - will be available for use
Establishing the performance measurement baseline (pmi northern utah)(v1)Glen Alleman
The Performance Measurement Baseline is a time phase, budgeted description of all the work on a project to produce the needed capabilities that fulfill the business case or accomplish the mission
Project driven organization require lifecycle management to successfully deliver value to those paying for the outcomes of the project effort. This involves processes and data for Executive processes, Enterprise Governance, Program Management Office activities, Applications that enable the delivery of value, and overarching processes and data.
Recent College of Performance Management Webinar on using Technical Performance to inform Earned Value Management. Six steps to building a credible Performance Measurement Baseline to connect the dots between all the elements of the program
SE1 - Integrating SE and PPM to Increase the Probability of SuccessGlen Alleman
New systems mean new paradigms
An Unconstrained system is a collection of component systems, simple or complex
A Complex System is a collection of large, multifaceted, and interre;lated component systems
Managing both requires process be in place
Performance-Based Management
integrates Principles, Practices, and Processes
– to assure actionable information is provided to the decision makers that can increase the Probability Of Program Success.
Successful projects deliver capabilities:
§ Not work efforts,
§ Not cost expenditures,
§ Not documentation, test results, or the processes.
§ These all needed, but they’re not the deliverables.
§ For success projects must deliver tangible beneficial outcomes, assessed in units of measure meaningful to the decision makers.
This slide deck is an extract from the Book of the same name https://www.amazon.com/Performance-Based-Project-Management-Increasing-Probability/dp/0814433308
The core concepts of a Release Based development lifecycle for agile enterprise projects.
The lifecycle starts with the Product Roadmap, showing what Capabilities are provided in what order, in what Capability, to deliver the needed business value, on the needed dates, for the needed cost, with the needed Features.
The Features and Stories that implement these Capabilities are traceable to the Product Roadmap to show Physical Percent Complete from starting at the Story flowing to a Capability to deliver a needed Capability.
Increasing the Probability of Project Success with Five Principles and PracticesGlen Alleman
There are many approaches to managing projects in every domain.
This seminar lays the foundations for increasing the probability of project success, no matter the domain, what technology, what approach to delivering the outcomes of the project.
The principles of this approach are immutable.
The practices for implementing the principles are universally applicable.
Each chart in this presentation, contains guidance that can be applied to your project, no matter the domain.
In our short hour here, we’re going to cover a lot of material.
The bibliography contains the supporting materials we can tailor to your individual project
The core concepts of a Release Based development lifecycle for NES projects.
The lifecycle starts with the Product Roadmap, showing what Capabilities are provided in what order, in what Epic, to deliver the needed business value, on the needed dates, for the needed cost, with the needed Features.
The Features and Stories that implement these Capabilities are traceable to the Product Roadmap to show Physical Percent Complete from starting at the Story flowing to a Capability to deliver a needed Capability.
SOLVING PROJECT ALLOCATION RESOURCE PROBLEMS WITH AEROSPACE ERPKevin West
Defence manufacturing is all about project manufacturing and project accounting. And that means enterprise resource planning (ERP) software for defence manufacturing must include robust functionality for project management and specifically project cost allocation.
Calculating Physical Percent Complete on Agile ProjectsGlen Alleman
Developing software using Scrum still needs the ability to determine the Estimate to Complete (ETC), the Estimate at Completion (EAC), and the Estimated Completion Data (ECD) when there is a fixed deliverable date, a fixed budget for that software, and a minimal set of Features and Capabilities on that date for that budget
The integrated master plan and integrated master scheduleGlen Alleman
The Integrated Master Plan (IMP) and Integrated Master Schedule( (IMS) provide a strategy for the incremental delivery of program outcomes through increasing maturity assessments with Measures of Effectiveness, Measures of Performance, Technical Performance Measures, and Key Performance Parameters.
These assessment assure the needed capabilities of the project are met at each assessment point to confirm physical percent complete as planned in the Integrated Master Plan
Establishing the Performance Measurement BaselineGlen Alleman
The Performance Measurement Baseline is a time-phased schedule of all work to be performed, the budgeted cost for this work, and the organizational elements that produce the deliverables from this work.
PGCS 2019 Master Class Integrating SE with PPMGlen Alleman
The projects are managed as if they were merely complicated ‒ when in fact, they were complex.They are planned as if everything is known or knowable at the start ‒ when in fact, they involve high levels of reducible (Epistemic) and irreducible (Aleatory) uncertainty and resulting risk.Combining Systems Engineering and Project Management is a critical success factor in reducing these uncertainties, resulting in increased probability of program success.
Performance based planning in a nut shell (V5)Glen Alleman
Step by step activtiies to increase the probability of success for all projects, no matter the project domain. These principles and practices can be found in all successful projects.
Project Success: The Basis of the Five Immutable PrinciplesGlen Alleman
Some people in the field talk about the “basic tenets” of project management. Where do these come from? Some say they come from hands-on experience, anecdotal “best practices,” and the good old “school of hard knocks.”
Published in The Public Manager, Vol. 43, No. 3, Fall 2014
We have lots data. Let’s use it create more credible estimates to help tame the growth beast. In spite the estimating community’s efforts to provide credible estimates, government programs still seem to deliver less than promised, cost more than planned, and take longer than needed. When estimates are consistently biased low:
- Decisions of choice are distorted
- Cost growth causes more growth as programs are stretched out to fund portfolios with fixed budgets
- Taxpayers become more cynical and negative about government
- The estimating community’s credibility is seriously questioned
SE1 - Integrating SE and PPM to Increase the Probability of SuccessGlen Alleman
New systems mean new paradigms
An Unconstrained system is a collection of component systems, simple or complex
A Complex System is a collection of large, multifaceted, and interre;lated component systems
Managing both requires process be in place
Performance-Based Management
integrates Principles, Practices, and Processes
– to assure actionable information is provided to the decision makers that can increase the Probability Of Program Success.
Successful projects deliver capabilities:
§ Not work efforts,
§ Not cost expenditures,
§ Not documentation, test results, or the processes.
§ These all needed, but they’re not the deliverables.
§ For success projects must deliver tangible beneficial outcomes, assessed in units of measure meaningful to the decision makers.
This slide deck is an extract from the Book of the same name https://www.amazon.com/Performance-Based-Project-Management-Increasing-Probability/dp/0814433308
The core concepts of a Release Based development lifecycle for agile enterprise projects.
The lifecycle starts with the Product Roadmap, showing what Capabilities are provided in what order, in what Capability, to deliver the needed business value, on the needed dates, for the needed cost, with the needed Features.
The Features and Stories that implement these Capabilities are traceable to the Product Roadmap to show Physical Percent Complete from starting at the Story flowing to a Capability to deliver a needed Capability.
Increasing the Probability of Project Success with Five Principles and PracticesGlen Alleman
There are many approaches to managing projects in every domain.
This seminar lays the foundations for increasing the probability of project success, no matter the domain, what technology, what approach to delivering the outcomes of the project.
The principles of this approach are immutable.
The practices for implementing the principles are universally applicable.
Each chart in this presentation, contains guidance that can be applied to your project, no matter the domain.
In our short hour here, we’re going to cover a lot of material.
The bibliography contains the supporting materials we can tailor to your individual project
The core concepts of a Release Based development lifecycle for NES projects.
The lifecycle starts with the Product Roadmap, showing what Capabilities are provided in what order, in what Epic, to deliver the needed business value, on the needed dates, for the needed cost, with the needed Features.
The Features and Stories that implement these Capabilities are traceable to the Product Roadmap to show Physical Percent Complete from starting at the Story flowing to a Capability to deliver a needed Capability.
SOLVING PROJECT ALLOCATION RESOURCE PROBLEMS WITH AEROSPACE ERPKevin West
Defence manufacturing is all about project manufacturing and project accounting. And that means enterprise resource planning (ERP) software for defence manufacturing must include robust functionality for project management and specifically project cost allocation.
Calculating Physical Percent Complete on Agile ProjectsGlen Alleman
Developing software using Scrum still needs the ability to determine the Estimate to Complete (ETC), the Estimate at Completion (EAC), and the Estimated Completion Data (ECD) when there is a fixed deliverable date, a fixed budget for that software, and a minimal set of Features and Capabilities on that date for that budget
The integrated master plan and integrated master scheduleGlen Alleman
The Integrated Master Plan (IMP) and Integrated Master Schedule( (IMS) provide a strategy for the incremental delivery of program outcomes through increasing maturity assessments with Measures of Effectiveness, Measures of Performance, Technical Performance Measures, and Key Performance Parameters.
These assessment assure the needed capabilities of the project are met at each assessment point to confirm physical percent complete as planned in the Integrated Master Plan
Establishing the Performance Measurement BaselineGlen Alleman
The Performance Measurement Baseline is a time-phased schedule of all work to be performed, the budgeted cost for this work, and the organizational elements that produce the deliverables from this work.
PGCS 2019 Master Class Integrating SE with PPMGlen Alleman
The projects are managed as if they were merely complicated ‒ when in fact, they were complex.They are planned as if everything is known or knowable at the start ‒ when in fact, they involve high levels of reducible (Epistemic) and irreducible (Aleatory) uncertainty and resulting risk.Combining Systems Engineering and Project Management is a critical success factor in reducing these uncertainties, resulting in increased probability of program success.
Performance based planning in a nut shell (V5)Glen Alleman
Step by step activtiies to increase the probability of success for all projects, no matter the project domain. These principles and practices can be found in all successful projects.
Project Success: The Basis of the Five Immutable PrinciplesGlen Alleman
Some people in the field talk about the “basic tenets” of project management. Where do these come from? Some say they come from hands-on experience, anecdotal “best practices,” and the good old “school of hard knocks.”
Published in The Public Manager, Vol. 43, No. 3, Fall 2014
We have lots data. Let’s use it create more credible estimates to help tame the growth beast. In spite the estimating community’s efforts to provide credible estimates, government programs still seem to deliver less than promised, cost more than planned, and take longer than needed. When estimates are consistently biased low:
- Decisions of choice are distorted
- Cost growth causes more growth as programs are stretched out to fund portfolios with fixed budgets
- Taxpayers become more cynical and negative about government
- The estimating community’s credibility is seriously questioned
Delivering programs with less capability than promised, while exceeding the cost and planned durations, distorts decision making, contributes to increasing cost growth to other programs, undermines the Federal government’s credibility with taxpayers and contributes to the public’s negative support for these programs.
Many reasons have been hypothesized and documented for cost and schedule growth. The authors review some of these reasons, and propose that government and contractors use the historical variability of the past programs to establish cost and schedule estimates at the outset and periodically update these estimates with up-to-date risks, to increase the probability of program success. For this to happen, the authors recommend changes to estimating, acquisition and contracting processes.
Slides as given for the Feb. 12, 2014 talk at Bay Area Software Testers.
(btw, I failed to give credit for the "Stand Back!" t-shirt image, it was from the XKCD T-shirt here: http://store-xkcd-com.myshopify.com/products/try-science)
Also forgot reference to the paper on Fibonacci numbers in planning poker affecting estimates: http://simula.no/publications/Simula.simula.1282/simula_pdf_file
Avoid software project horror stories - check the reality value of the estima...Harold van Heeringen
Many large software projects turn into software horror stories, resulting in newspaper headlines and even political issues. Often, the project costs and schedule were estimated unrealistically optimistic, using immature estimation techniques. A relatively simple way to avoid many problems is to perform a reality check on the estimate. This presentation was given on the conference of the International Cost Estimating and Analysis Association (ICEAA2014), June 2014 (Denver, USA)
The Impedance Mismatch in Integrated Engineering Design Systems is an issue in the Integration of commercial off the shelf (COTS) components.
This issue is a member of the Impedance Mismatch
problems found when commercial off the shelf
components are assembled into systems.
This mismatch occurs when event, control sequence,
or data semantics of two or more participating application
domains are mismatched.
During the system integration process the impedance
mismatch must be addressed through some means,
either through an integration layer which hides the
mismatch or through an integrating service, such as
CORBA, which facilitates the impedance adaptation
between the applications.
When we hear that a proposed process, tool, method or any ideas is all about "risk management," check to see if it covers these areas. If not, the suggestion is not really about risk management.
Una pequeña reflexión sobre diferentes maneras de evitar que los perros manchen la calle con sus necesidades. Nos encontramos desde avisos procedentes de las autoridades, tanto apelando a la ley como premiando actitudes positivas, hasta carteles hechos por particulares.
The use of an architecture–centered development process for delivering information technology began with the introduction of client / server based systems. Early client/server and legacy mainframe applications did not provide the architectural flexibility needed to meet the changing business requirements of the modern manufacturing organization. With the introduction of Object Oriented systems, the need for an architecture–centered process became a critical success factor. Object reuse, layered system components, data abstraction,
web based user interfaces, CORBA, and rapid development and deployment processes all provide economic
incentives for object technologies. However, adopting the latest object oriented technology, without an adequate understanding of how this technology fits a specific architecture, risks the creation of an instant legacy
system.
This is a familiar topic to all in the project management business. We usually start our project management quest with capturing requirements, building a schedule to deliver them, executing that schedule, and making adjustments along the way when we’re not staying on schedule.
Performance-Based Project Management® id s deliverables based approach to project success. Deliverables start with the needed capabilities that the project produces to meet the mission objectives or fulfill a business case.
These deliverables fulfill the requirements, assessed through Measures of Effectiveness and Measures of Performance
IS EARNED VALUE + AGILE A MATCH MADE IN HEAVEN?
Increasing the Probability of Program Success requires by connecting the dots between EV and Agile Development.
Presented at
The Nexus of Agile Software Development and
Earned Value Management, OSD-PARCA,
February 19 – 20, 2015
Institute for Defense Analysis, Alexandria, VA
There are four major questions that need answers when applying agile software development to DOD development programs
1. How can Agile Development methods increase the Probability of Program Success (PoPS) on Earned Value programs?
2. How can Agile development be integrated with the FAR / DFAR and OMB mandates for program performance measures using Earned Value?
3. What are the “touch” points (or possible collision points) between Agile and EIA-748-C?
4. What are the measures of success for Agile methods in the context of EIA-748-C?
Five immutable principles of project successGlen Alleman
All successful projects adhere to five immutable principles during their lifecycle. These principles are independent of any project or program domain or context in that domain. They are also independent of any project management or product development method as well, including Agile. They ask five questions that must have credible answers that establish the foundation for success. Without credible answers to these 5 questions, the project has little hope of success.
Customers measure progress in terms of business value – the currency of this business value are the project deliverables, not the passage of time or consumption of money.
Five Immutable Principles of Project of Digital Transformation SuccessGlen Alleman
Successful Digital Transformation projects are fraught with technical, cost, and schedule risks.
These Five Principles of Project Success have been shown to increase the Probability of Project Success (PoPS).
Building A Credible Measurement BaselineGlen Alleman
Establishing a credible Performance Measurement Baseline, with a risk adjusted Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule, starts with the WBS and connects Technical Measures of progress to Earned Value
EIA-748-C asks us to “objectively assess accomplishments at the work performance level.” As well §3.8 of 748-C tells us “Earned Value is a direct measurement of the quantity of work accomplished. The quality and technical content of work performed is controlled by other processes.”
Nowadays, as the software industry is slowly becoming more mature, software measurement and performance measurement are becoming increasingly important. Organizations need to know their productivity and competitiveness in software development projects for various reasons. In many software development contracts, targets are set for the suppliers to reach. These targets are based on software metrics like productivity, speed of delivery and software quality. In order to check if the targets are reached, it is necessary to measure the functional size of the software product that is delivered and also the functional size of the software development project that is carried out, as there is usually a difference between these two sizes. To be able to use functional size in contracts, it must be measured in an objective, repeatable, verifiable and therefore defensible way. That being the case, the industry’s best practice is to use an ISO/IEC standard for functional size measurement, e.g. Nesma, COSMIC or IFPUG function points. However, these methods only measure the functional user requirements from the total software requirements to be delivered. In activities like project estimation and productivity measurement, the influence of the non-functional requirements is expressed in the Project Delivery Rate (PDR) which is expressed in effort hours per function point. If more than the average amount of non-functional requirements need to be realized in a project (or more severe non-functional requirements), the PDR used should also be higher. In the industry it is customary to set productivity targets based on an average (or calibrated) influence of non-functional requirements and this works quite fine in traditional software projects. In software development projects that are executed in an agile way, this is not always the case. When working agile, there are forces that influence the traditional way of performance measurement significantly, resulting in a number of serious issues. In this paper these issues are explained and a method to overcome these issues is proposed.
Planning projects usually starts with tasks and milestones. The planner gathers this information from the participants – customers, engineers, subject matter experts. This information is usually arranged in the form of activities and milestones. PMBOK defines “project time management” in this manner. The activities are then sequenced according to the projects needs and mandatory dependencies.
Increasing the Probability of Project SuccessGlen Alleman
Risk Management is essential for development and production programs. Information about key cost, performance and schedule attributes are often uncertain or unknown until late in the program.
Risk issues that can be identified early in the program, which may potentially impact the program, termed Known Unknowns, can be alleviated with good risk management. -- Effective Risk Management 2nd Edition, Page 1, Edmund Conrow, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2003
Cost and schedule growth for complex projects is created when unrealistic technical performance expectations, unrealistic cost and schedule estimates, inadequate risk assessments, unanticipated technical issues, and poorly performed and ineffective risk management, contribute to project technical and programmatic shortfalls
From Principles to Strategies for Systems EngineeringGlen Alleman
From Principles to Strategies How to apply Principles, Practices, and Processes of Systems Engineering to solve complex technical, operational,
and organizational problems
Building a Credible Performance Measurement BaselineGlen Alleman
Establishing a credible Performance Measurement Baseline, with a risk adjusted Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule, starts with the WBS and connects Technical Measures of progress to Earned Value
Capabilities‒Based Planning the capabilities needed to accomplish a mission or fulfill a business strategy
Only when capabilities are defined can we start with requirements elicitation
Starting with the development of a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) estimate of work and duration, creating the Product Roadmap and Release Plan, the Product and Sprint Backlogs, executing and statusing the Sprint, and informing the Earned Value Management Systems, using Physical Percent Complete of progress to plan.
Program Management Office Lean Software Development and Six SigmaGlen Alleman
Successfully combining a PMO, Agile, and Lean / 6 starts with understanding what benefit each paradigm brings to the table. Architecting a solution for the enterprise requires assembling a “Systems” with processes, people, and principles – all sharing the goal of business improvement.
This resource document describes the Program Governance Road map for product development, deployment, and sustainment of products and services in compliance with CMS guidance, ITIL IT management, CMMI best practices, and other guidance to assure high quality software is deployed for sustained operational success in mission critical domains.
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Let's dive deeper into the world of ODC! Ricardo Alves (OutSystems) will join us to tell all about the new Data Fabric. After that, Sezen de Bruijn (OutSystems) will get into the details on how to best design a sturdy architecture within ODC.
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Tobias Schneck
As AI technology is pushing into IT I was wondering myself, as an “infrastructure container kubernetes guy”, how get this fancy AI technology get managed from an infrastructure operational view? Is it possible to apply our lovely cloud native principals as well? What benefit’s both technologies could bring to each other?
Let me take this questions and provide you a short journey through existing deployment models and use cases for AI software. On practical examples, we discuss what cloud/on-premise strategy we may need for applying it to our own infrastructure to get it to work from an enterprise perspective. I want to give an overview about infrastructure requirements and technologies, what could be beneficial or limiting your AI use cases in an enterprise environment. An interactive Demo will give you some insides, what approaches I got already working for real.
2. I’ll present today eight (8) core steps in developing a credible Performance Measurement
Baseline (PMB).
These appear to be “easy” steps in principle. In practice of course all things are hard when
it comes to successfully managing programs.
But let’s start with the principles. And let’s also remember Yogi Berra’s quote
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.
So let’s talk a little bit about the theory, but focus our time here on the practice of building
a credible Performance Measurement Baseline.
Glen B. Alleman
Lewis & Fowler, 8310 South Valley
Highway, Englewood CO80112
www.lewisandfowler.com 2
5. Building a credible PMB starts with identifying the architecture of the IMP and the
supporting tasks in the IMS.
Although this is restating the obvious the process to do this is actually quite hard.
Adding schedule and cost risk identification and mitigation to the process is the
minimal result for a winning proposal.
It cannot be emphasized enough – the architecture of the IMS is critical to
identifying i k t l
id tif i a risk tolerant schedule. The “rats nest” approach i simply unacceptable
t h d l Th “ t t” h is i l t bl
to the success of any program.
9. Here’s our 8 steps to building the Performance Measurement Baseline.
Each step should be performed in the order defined here.
1. Define the product or service to be delivered
2. Define the maturity assessment points – the places where the pre‐defined technical
performance measures will be assessed
3. Define the accomplishments needed to move the product to a pre‐defined level of
maturity
4. Define the measurement criteria needed to performance the maturity assessment
measurements. These are the “exit” criteria for the individual work packages.
5. Define those work packages. Keep them inside a duration that answers the question
“how long are you willing to wait before you find out you’re late?” Most firms limit the
work packages to 60 calendar days
work packages to 60 calendar days
6. Connect the work packages in a sequence to provides increasing technical maturity and
minimal exposure to programmatic and technical risk.
7. Assemble all this information into an Integrated Master Schedule
8. Do this integration in an incremental manner – one program event at a time.
9
21. One of the new ideas about building the PMB is to only connect the Work Packages
together – instead of the Tasks. Tasks within the Work Package can be
interconnected.
But between the Work Packages, if there is interconnections the work on the right
will be using partially completed work on the left.
If this is done, then the work package on the right will absorb this partially
completed work, and when the work on the left is completed, re-work may be
re work
needed of anything changed.
Treat the work packages as complete “lumps of work,” with 100% fidelity to the
planned deliverable.
This way the work package on the right can start with fully formed raw materials.
21
29. Analysis of Probabilistic Schedule and Last Updated: 11/2/2009
Cost Models
When we speak of probabilistic risk analysis, we also need to speak of the statistical
nature of the activity network.
When we speak of a probabilistic activity network (a Bayesian network) we also
need to speak in terms of probability.
A question that can be asked of the network is – “ what is the probability of
completing this task by a certain date?”
A second question th t can be asked i – “ h t are th underlying statistics of th
d ti that b k d is “what the d l i t ti ti f the
activities of the network?”
A final question that needs to be asked is “what is the inherent uncertainty in these
estimates?”
In other words – how good is our ability to guess in the presence of a statistical
process?
Prepared by Glen B. Alleman
December 2005 29/176
32. And we need to connect that forecast of future performance to the technical performance
of product.
f d
Being on schedule and on budget but being out of compliance with the technical
performance measures is not good. More work is now needed to get the product “on
spec.”
Some might say that “off spec” is recognizable. But if the performance specification (MoP
or MoE) are statistical compliance, it’s not that straight forward.
We must understand what it means to be statistically compliant. This is a statistical process
control issue. In what Standard Deviation are we compliant. It’s different to be in the 1st
standard deviation than in the 2nd standard deviation.
This presentation is too short to dive into the issues around probabilistic compliance
models, but remember is simple story
What is the most likely (the mode) of temperatures in Trinidad Tobago and Cody
Wyoming?
Wyoming?
Well they are the same 78°
What is the variance?
Well that’s different
In Trinidad its about ± 5°
In Cody its – 50 to +20
In Cody its 50° to +20°
32