The document summarizes federal funding for environmental research and development from the National Science Foundation (NSF) in fiscal year 2013. It provides details on funding amounts for various departments within NSF that support environmental research, including the Biological Sciences, Environmental Biology, Integrative Organismal Systems, Engineering, Geosciences, and Biological Infrastructure. The NSF is the primary source of federal funding for basic environmental research at US universities, providing $1.6 billion for these purposes in FY2013 across various science disciplines.
Green Infrastructure (GI) facilities have capacity to enhance health and mitigate Environmental Sustainability Challenges (ESC). However, the extent of the mitigation and health benefits is unclear in developing countries. This study examined the impact of GI on ESC and Perceived Health (PH) of urban residents in Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria. Multi-stage sampling technique was used to select 1858 residents of Lagos Metropolis who completed semi-structured questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and chi-square test were used to explore data distributions and assess association of the availability of GI with resident’s PH and ESC. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (OR;95%CI) were estimated for good health and ESC mitigation. Participants were mostly men (58.9%) and younger than 50 years old (86.3%). Good health (20.5%) and high mitigation of ESC (collection and disposal of waste-52.7% and official development assistance-63.9%) were reported where GI is mostly available. Participants were more likely to report good health (OR:1.40; 95%CI:1.02-1.92) and high mitigation of ESC [water quality (OR:1.42; 95%CI:1.12-1.81) passenger transport mode (OR:1.41; 95%CI:1.06-1.89)] where GI are mostly available. Availability of Green infrastructure is supporting health and mitigating environmental sustainability challenges in the study area. Green infrastructure should be provided in urban areas where environmental sustainability is under threat.
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY URBAN AFFAIRS (2020), 4(1), 33-46.
https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2020.v4n1-4
Abdelrahim, s. (2017). using citizen based observations to plan..Melissa Maxter
As a global challenge with profound implications at the local level, climate change provides new opportunities for individual engagement. Communities around the world have their own unique experiences with the effects of climate change, as well as drastically different climate adaptation needs. This gives individuals an unprecedented role to play in sharing information and guiding policymaking through citizen-based observation. In “Using Citizen-Based Observations to Plan for Climate Change,” Sarah Abdelrahim looks at the work of a variety of citizen-based observation networks, also known as citizens’ observatories. She recommends greater cooperation and support from government agencies and decision-makers for these networks as a key aspect of any and all climate change adaptation strategies.
This text was originally published by the Atlantic Council.
Emergent global patterns_of_ecosystem_structure_and_function_form_a_mechanist...Dr Lendy Spires
This document summarizes a new mechanistic general ecosystem model (GEM) called the Madingley Model. The model simulates ecological processes like primary production, eating, growth, reproduction and dispersal for individual organisms ranging in size from 10 mg to 150,000 kg across terrestrial and marine environments globally. Emergent properties observed at individual, community, ecosystem and global scales, such as trophic structure and body size distributions, generally agree with empirical data without direct constraints. The model provides novel predictions about relationships between net primary productivity, trophic chain length and herbivore pressure. It indicates ecologists now have sufficient information to build realistic global models of ecosystem structure and function to predict impacts of human pressures.
Applying the Ecosystem Services Approach to BiofuelsSIANI
This document presents a conceptual framework for assessing the impacts of biofuel production on ecosystem services and human wellbeing. It introduces the ecosystem services concept and classification system from the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. The framework analyzes how biofuel production can affect provisioning, regulating, and cultural ecosystem services. It also examines the impacts on dimensions of human wellbeing, such as rural development, energy access, food security, health, and social issues. The framework aims to make the trade-offs between ecosystem services and human wellbeing explicit in order to consistently evaluate different biofuel production systems.
Forecasting Biomass Loss and Carbon Released to the Atmosphere as a Result of...IJEAB
Terrestrial climate change predictions use various models that are based on atmospheric parameters combined with projected carbon emission scenarios. Increased levels of carbon emissions into the atmosphere are accelerated by human activities and are the main reason of climate change (CC). CC threatens networks of protected areas (PAs) and forced many species out of PAs. Unfenced PAs gives species opportunity to migrate from one PA to another or other unprotected areas to sustain their climatic niche. Many PAs in SADC countries including transfrontier conservation areas (TFCA) are unfenced; hence, connectivity of PAs uses corridors. However, many of these corridors are unprotected and advocacies adaptation of reserved fauna and flora under CC. This paper explains the less known amount of biomass loss and carbon released to the atmosphere as result of habitat conversion of eastern corridor of Selous – Niassa TFCA which connecting the two PAs of Tanzania and Mozambique. Specifically, the study predicts amount of biomass loss, amount of carbon released to the atmosphere and amount of conservation profit disposed as a result of habitat conversion from 2015 to 2035. Existing data on spatial and temporal changes in land use and land cover (LULC) of eastern corridor of Selous – Niassa TFCA from 1986 – 2016 was analysed and used to forecast LULC from 2015 to 2035 by using CA-Markov model. The forecasted LULC from 2015 to 2035 was analysed to get intended results. The results revealed that, an average amount of 29559.8 tons of biomass (above ground + below ground + deadwood) loss annually from 2015 to 2035. Consequently, average amount of 40217.2 tons of carbon (above ground + below ground + deadwood) released to the atmosphere annually from 2015 to 2035 equivalent to US$ 160868.6 per annum if REDD+ implemented. The study concludes that, there is a need to include virgin corridors into core PAs network or formulation of sustainable conservation strategies that will consider climatic niche of both flora and fauna without compromising livelihoods of corridor dwellers.
This document describes mapping ecological facets across Australia by analyzing the key drivers of ecosystem formation - macroclimate, lithology, landform, and vegetation structural formations. 59 homogeneous bioclimatic regions were mapped based on clustering uncorrelated bioclimatic variables. Lithology and weathering intensity were derived from existing Geoscience Australia data. Landform was characterized through land surface form and topographic moisture potential indicators. Combining these ecosystem drivers with vegetation structural formations data resulted in a continental dataset of 369,439 unique ecological facets at 90m resolution. This ecological facets mapping provides insight into biophysical variation across Australian ecosystems.
HLEG thematic workshop on measuring economic, social and environmental resili...StatsCommunications
This document discusses measuring and understanding changes in Earth's ecosystems and their resilience. It notes that while we can count organisms and species, measure concentrations and fluxes, and quantify dynamic behavior, our understanding of systemic connections is still limited. It argues that both local contingent methods and global tracking are needed to understand complex change. Resilience assessments require plural, responsive sensing and participation of both local peoples and consideration of ecosystems in societal assessments.
Green Infrastructure (GI) facilities have capacity to enhance health and mitigate Environmental Sustainability Challenges (ESC). However, the extent of the mitigation and health benefits is unclear in developing countries. This study examined the impact of GI on ESC and Perceived Health (PH) of urban residents in Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria. Multi-stage sampling technique was used to select 1858 residents of Lagos Metropolis who completed semi-structured questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and chi-square test were used to explore data distributions and assess association of the availability of GI with resident’s PH and ESC. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (OR;95%CI) were estimated for good health and ESC mitigation. Participants were mostly men (58.9%) and younger than 50 years old (86.3%). Good health (20.5%) and high mitigation of ESC (collection and disposal of waste-52.7% and official development assistance-63.9%) were reported where GI is mostly available. Participants were more likely to report good health (OR:1.40; 95%CI:1.02-1.92) and high mitigation of ESC [water quality (OR:1.42; 95%CI:1.12-1.81) passenger transport mode (OR:1.41; 95%CI:1.06-1.89)] where GI are mostly available. Availability of Green infrastructure is supporting health and mitigating environmental sustainability challenges in the study area. Green infrastructure should be provided in urban areas where environmental sustainability is under threat.
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY URBAN AFFAIRS (2020), 4(1), 33-46.
https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2020.v4n1-4
Abdelrahim, s. (2017). using citizen based observations to plan..Melissa Maxter
As a global challenge with profound implications at the local level, climate change provides new opportunities for individual engagement. Communities around the world have their own unique experiences with the effects of climate change, as well as drastically different climate adaptation needs. This gives individuals an unprecedented role to play in sharing information and guiding policymaking through citizen-based observation. In “Using Citizen-Based Observations to Plan for Climate Change,” Sarah Abdelrahim looks at the work of a variety of citizen-based observation networks, also known as citizens’ observatories. She recommends greater cooperation and support from government agencies and decision-makers for these networks as a key aspect of any and all climate change adaptation strategies.
This text was originally published by the Atlantic Council.
Emergent global patterns_of_ecosystem_structure_and_function_form_a_mechanist...Dr Lendy Spires
This document summarizes a new mechanistic general ecosystem model (GEM) called the Madingley Model. The model simulates ecological processes like primary production, eating, growth, reproduction and dispersal for individual organisms ranging in size from 10 mg to 150,000 kg across terrestrial and marine environments globally. Emergent properties observed at individual, community, ecosystem and global scales, such as trophic structure and body size distributions, generally agree with empirical data without direct constraints. The model provides novel predictions about relationships between net primary productivity, trophic chain length and herbivore pressure. It indicates ecologists now have sufficient information to build realistic global models of ecosystem structure and function to predict impacts of human pressures.
Applying the Ecosystem Services Approach to BiofuelsSIANI
This document presents a conceptual framework for assessing the impacts of biofuel production on ecosystem services and human wellbeing. It introduces the ecosystem services concept and classification system from the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. The framework analyzes how biofuel production can affect provisioning, regulating, and cultural ecosystem services. It also examines the impacts on dimensions of human wellbeing, such as rural development, energy access, food security, health, and social issues. The framework aims to make the trade-offs between ecosystem services and human wellbeing explicit in order to consistently evaluate different biofuel production systems.
Forecasting Biomass Loss and Carbon Released to the Atmosphere as a Result of...IJEAB
Terrestrial climate change predictions use various models that are based on atmospheric parameters combined with projected carbon emission scenarios. Increased levels of carbon emissions into the atmosphere are accelerated by human activities and are the main reason of climate change (CC). CC threatens networks of protected areas (PAs) and forced many species out of PAs. Unfenced PAs gives species opportunity to migrate from one PA to another or other unprotected areas to sustain their climatic niche. Many PAs in SADC countries including transfrontier conservation areas (TFCA) are unfenced; hence, connectivity of PAs uses corridors. However, many of these corridors are unprotected and advocacies adaptation of reserved fauna and flora under CC. This paper explains the less known amount of biomass loss and carbon released to the atmosphere as result of habitat conversion of eastern corridor of Selous – Niassa TFCA which connecting the two PAs of Tanzania and Mozambique. Specifically, the study predicts amount of biomass loss, amount of carbon released to the atmosphere and amount of conservation profit disposed as a result of habitat conversion from 2015 to 2035. Existing data on spatial and temporal changes in land use and land cover (LULC) of eastern corridor of Selous – Niassa TFCA from 1986 – 2016 was analysed and used to forecast LULC from 2015 to 2035 by using CA-Markov model. The forecasted LULC from 2015 to 2035 was analysed to get intended results. The results revealed that, an average amount of 29559.8 tons of biomass (above ground + below ground + deadwood) loss annually from 2015 to 2035. Consequently, average amount of 40217.2 tons of carbon (above ground + below ground + deadwood) released to the atmosphere annually from 2015 to 2035 equivalent to US$ 160868.6 per annum if REDD+ implemented. The study concludes that, there is a need to include virgin corridors into core PAs network or formulation of sustainable conservation strategies that will consider climatic niche of both flora and fauna without compromising livelihoods of corridor dwellers.
This document describes mapping ecological facets across Australia by analyzing the key drivers of ecosystem formation - macroclimate, lithology, landform, and vegetation structural formations. 59 homogeneous bioclimatic regions were mapped based on clustering uncorrelated bioclimatic variables. Lithology and weathering intensity were derived from existing Geoscience Australia data. Landform was characterized through land surface form and topographic moisture potential indicators. Combining these ecosystem drivers with vegetation structural formations data resulted in a continental dataset of 369,439 unique ecological facets at 90m resolution. This ecological facets mapping provides insight into biophysical variation across Australian ecosystems.
HLEG thematic workshop on measuring economic, social and environmental resili...StatsCommunications
This document discusses measuring and understanding changes in Earth's ecosystems and their resilience. It notes that while we can count organisms and species, measure concentrations and fluxes, and quantify dynamic behavior, our understanding of systemic connections is still limited. It argues that both local contingent methods and global tracking are needed to understand complex change. Resilience assessments require plural, responsive sensing and participation of both local peoples and consideration of ecosystems in societal assessments.
Rick Stevens: Prospects for a Systematic Exploration of Earths Microbial Dive...GigaScience, BGI Hong Kong
Rick Stevens presented information about the Earth Microbiome Project (EMP), which aims to systematically characterize microbial life on Earth through a combination of extremely deep metagenomic sequencing and large-scale horizontal surveys. The EMP will establish common standards and coordinate independent projects proposed by the research community to advance large-scale microbial ecology research. It will generate over 1 petabase of sequencing data from around 1 million samples to map microbial habitats and discover new microbial diversity, genomes, and proteins.
This document outlines the methodology for comparing landscapes in the CRP6 research project. It will use a Most Different Systems Design (MDSD) to compare 3-8 landscapes that show high variation. Two key research questions are identified: 1) Does variation in tree cover/quality affect outcomes like poverty and food security? 2) What explains spatial and temporal variation in tree cover? Integrated conceptual frameworks are discussed to combine biophysical and social data, including the DPSIR, press/pulse, and social metabolism approaches. Common factors across landscapes will be examined to understand relationships between rural livelihoods and environmental conditions related to tree cover change.
Human population growth and consumption patterns have significant environmental impacts. The module aims to develop understanding of human-environment interactions and population trends. Key topics covered include demographic characteristics of human populations, historical and current trends in population size and distribution, factors influencing population growth rates, approaches to population control, and relationships between population, poverty, and environmental degradation. Variations in global consumption patterns are also examined.
Hawkesbury institute soil biology masterclassDavid Thompson
This two-day masterclass on soil biology will be held on August 13-14, 2013 at the University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury Campus. It will provide participants with an advanced understanding of soil biology concepts and theories, and insights into explicitly managing soil biology to improve soil productivity. The masterclass will be led by Professors Ian Anderson and Brajesh Singh, and Dr. Jeff Powell from the Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, along with external experts Professor Lynette Abbott from the University of Western Australia and Associate Professor Pauline Mele from the Victorian Department of Primary Industries.
This document presents a Candidate Conservation Agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to protect the greater sage-grouse and its habitat on the Idaho National Laboratory Site. It establishes a Sage-grouse Conservation Area that limits development and disturbance in 68% of remaining sagebrush habitat, protecting lands within 1 km of active lek sites that support 74% of breeding sage-grouse. The agreement introduces population and habitat triggers to monitor impacts and outlines 13 conservation measures to address threats like infrastructure development and human disturbance while allowing DOE to fulfill its mission.
This document discusses a global study examining the impacts of storms on freshwater habitats and phytoplankton assemblages. It outlines the study's goals of analyzing data from over 30 lakes to identify how storms affect ecosystems, biodiversity, and community resilience. The study faces challenges in dealing with heterogeneous data from different disciplines and origins. It employs adapted team management, data compilation strategies, and analytical methods like meta-analysis and trait-based approaches to standardize data and facilitate comparisons across sites. Initial results are available on the study website.
Scientific data is used to assess environmental risk and ensure biodiversity conservation in several ways:
1) Qualitative and quantitative methods like indices are used to measure biodiversity levels and threats.
2) Environmental impact assessments require developers to identify potential effects and propose safeguards to reduce impacts.
3) The precautionary principle places the burden of proof on actions that could harm the environment when risks are uncertain.
4) Risk analysis uses hypothesis testing and comparisons to evaluate probabilities of species extinction.
Dr. Paul J. Croft currently serves as Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs at Kean University. He earned his doctoral degree from Rutgers University studying weather related stress on cranberry growth. His research has focused on operational and applied meteorology, climate, environmental sensors, and cranberry scald. As the initial Executive Director of the School of Environmental and Sustainability Sciences at Kean University, he helped organize faculty, labs, and foster research-based learning. Dr. Croft has held numerous leadership roles in professional organizations and received several awards for his research and teaching.
Petes 2014 science integration into us climate and ocean policy discussionLoretta Roberson
This document discusses science integration into US climate and ocean policy. It outlines several key US policy initiatives that aim to manage impacts of climate change and ocean acidification such as the National Climate Assessment. Examples of how scientific information has been incorporated into policies and planning are provided, including through climate assessments, early-warning systems, and long-term planning like marine protected areas. Opportunities for advancing partnerships between scientists and decision-makers are explored, such as collaborating on research and ensuring scientific findings are disseminated in usable formats.
CERN has 20 years of experience monitoring and researching Chinese ecosystems through its network of 42 stations. It conducts long-term experiments on issues like nutrient management, habitat restoration, and climate change impacts. CERN also demonstrates ecosystem management models, such as controlling soil and water loss on the Loess Plateau and restoring degraded grasslands. The speaker hopes to strengthen collaborations between CERN and other international networks through joint projects, staff exchanges, and workshops.
The document provides an overview of collaboration at the James Hutton Institute. It discusses the benefits of collaboration, including drawing on a wider pool of skills and knowledge to address complex issues. It also mentions transferring knowledge and skills, extending research networks, and wider dissemination of outcomes. The document provides examples of recent collaborations across the research sector and acknowledges those involved in collaboration efforts.
This document provides a summary of a book titled "Yellowstone's Wildlife in Transition" which evaluates the effectiveness of ecological process management in sustaining processes in Yellowstone National Park. The book was edited by experts from Yellowstone National Park and Montana State University and contains research from 32 contributors on topics like population dynamics, migration, effects of exotic species, climate change, and more. It finds that while ecosystem management has helped restore nature, expectations of preserving historical conditions are difficult due to human impacts and climate change. The editors suggest minimal interference could continue in wilderness areas but other areas may require more intervention to address issues like invasive species or changing communities.
IARU Global Challenges 2014 Cornell Tracking our declineSarah Cornell
There is growing attention to the global risks - not just local impacts - of present rates of biodiversity loss. It is worth keeping in mind that 'biodiversity loss' actually means the destruction (sometimes irreversible) – by us, people – of living organisms, Earth's 'genetic library', species, ecosystems and habitats. The fact that ecosystems are complex, adaptive, and locally specific means they can't be adequately represented in a single global measure. But without any overarching global perspective on losses, the locally contingent measures are 'untethered' to the real risks of systemic change. Scientists of many kinds are rising to the transdisciplinary challenge of dealing with this complexity in the face of global drivers of change (climate change, development pressures), recognizing that it is a challenge for everyone, not just academia.
2.4 biomes zonation and succession notesBrad Kremer
The document discusses key concepts relating to biomes, zonation, and succession. It begins by defining biomes as groups of ecosystems with similar climates that can be classified into aquatic, forest, grassland, desert, or tundra. Each biome has characteristic limiting factors, productivity, and biodiversity. The document then discusses zonation, succession, and how climate change is altering biome distribution and causing shifts. It also addresses the concepts of pioneer, intermediate, and climax communities in succession and how this relates to ecosystem stability, diversity, and resilience over time.
State Action Plan June 2013 Briefing, Doug Beard, USGS National Climate Change and Wildlife. Department of Interior Climate Science Centers and National Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center
- Climate change has led to earlier springs and vegetation growth over the past 27 years, advancing by 0.6 days per year. However, birth timing in roe deer did not advance to match this, remaining stable.
- As a result, the mismatch between birth timing and peak vegetation/resource availability increased by 0.54 days per year, reaching 36 days in 2011.
- Earlier birth timing is favored by selection as it increases early fawn survival, but birth timing shows limited heritability and plasticity in roe deer.
- Increased mismatch led to lower cohort survival, with a 40% decrease in survival for every 1 month increase in mismatch. Individual early survival also decreased linearly once mismatch exceeded 16
El documento describe un proyecto inmobiliario de apartamentos en Rionegro con acabados de alta calidad como pisos de cerámica, puertas de roble, cocinas integrales con mesón de mármol y ventanas de aluminio. Los apartamentos tienen entre 75 y 81 metros cuadrados con 2 habitaciones, 2 baños, sala comedor y balcón. Se ofrece un garaje opcional por $9 millones y se aceptan propuestas de forma de pago.
GOLDEN TIJUCA, alto luxo pronto pra morar na Tijuca Nobre.Marcelo Maia
O documento apresenta um projeto imobiliário chamado Golden Tijuca localizado na Rua Marquês de Valença, Tijuca, Rio de Janeiro. O empreendimento oferece apartamentos de 3 e 4 quartos entre 94 e 114m2, além de coberturas, com diversas opções de lazer como piscinas, salão de festas, academia e brinquedoteca.
Rick Stevens: Prospects for a Systematic Exploration of Earths Microbial Dive...GigaScience, BGI Hong Kong
Rick Stevens presented information about the Earth Microbiome Project (EMP), which aims to systematically characterize microbial life on Earth through a combination of extremely deep metagenomic sequencing and large-scale horizontal surveys. The EMP will establish common standards and coordinate independent projects proposed by the research community to advance large-scale microbial ecology research. It will generate over 1 petabase of sequencing data from around 1 million samples to map microbial habitats and discover new microbial diversity, genomes, and proteins.
This document outlines the methodology for comparing landscapes in the CRP6 research project. It will use a Most Different Systems Design (MDSD) to compare 3-8 landscapes that show high variation. Two key research questions are identified: 1) Does variation in tree cover/quality affect outcomes like poverty and food security? 2) What explains spatial and temporal variation in tree cover? Integrated conceptual frameworks are discussed to combine biophysical and social data, including the DPSIR, press/pulse, and social metabolism approaches. Common factors across landscapes will be examined to understand relationships between rural livelihoods and environmental conditions related to tree cover change.
Human population growth and consumption patterns have significant environmental impacts. The module aims to develop understanding of human-environment interactions and population trends. Key topics covered include demographic characteristics of human populations, historical and current trends in population size and distribution, factors influencing population growth rates, approaches to population control, and relationships between population, poverty, and environmental degradation. Variations in global consumption patterns are also examined.
Hawkesbury institute soil biology masterclassDavid Thompson
This two-day masterclass on soil biology will be held on August 13-14, 2013 at the University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury Campus. It will provide participants with an advanced understanding of soil biology concepts and theories, and insights into explicitly managing soil biology to improve soil productivity. The masterclass will be led by Professors Ian Anderson and Brajesh Singh, and Dr. Jeff Powell from the Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, along with external experts Professor Lynette Abbott from the University of Western Australia and Associate Professor Pauline Mele from the Victorian Department of Primary Industries.
This document presents a Candidate Conservation Agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to protect the greater sage-grouse and its habitat on the Idaho National Laboratory Site. It establishes a Sage-grouse Conservation Area that limits development and disturbance in 68% of remaining sagebrush habitat, protecting lands within 1 km of active lek sites that support 74% of breeding sage-grouse. The agreement introduces population and habitat triggers to monitor impacts and outlines 13 conservation measures to address threats like infrastructure development and human disturbance while allowing DOE to fulfill its mission.
This document discusses a global study examining the impacts of storms on freshwater habitats and phytoplankton assemblages. It outlines the study's goals of analyzing data from over 30 lakes to identify how storms affect ecosystems, biodiversity, and community resilience. The study faces challenges in dealing with heterogeneous data from different disciplines and origins. It employs adapted team management, data compilation strategies, and analytical methods like meta-analysis and trait-based approaches to standardize data and facilitate comparisons across sites. Initial results are available on the study website.
Scientific data is used to assess environmental risk and ensure biodiversity conservation in several ways:
1) Qualitative and quantitative methods like indices are used to measure biodiversity levels and threats.
2) Environmental impact assessments require developers to identify potential effects and propose safeguards to reduce impacts.
3) The precautionary principle places the burden of proof on actions that could harm the environment when risks are uncertain.
4) Risk analysis uses hypothesis testing and comparisons to evaluate probabilities of species extinction.
Dr. Paul J. Croft currently serves as Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs at Kean University. He earned his doctoral degree from Rutgers University studying weather related stress on cranberry growth. His research has focused on operational and applied meteorology, climate, environmental sensors, and cranberry scald. As the initial Executive Director of the School of Environmental and Sustainability Sciences at Kean University, he helped organize faculty, labs, and foster research-based learning. Dr. Croft has held numerous leadership roles in professional organizations and received several awards for his research and teaching.
Petes 2014 science integration into us climate and ocean policy discussionLoretta Roberson
This document discusses science integration into US climate and ocean policy. It outlines several key US policy initiatives that aim to manage impacts of climate change and ocean acidification such as the National Climate Assessment. Examples of how scientific information has been incorporated into policies and planning are provided, including through climate assessments, early-warning systems, and long-term planning like marine protected areas. Opportunities for advancing partnerships between scientists and decision-makers are explored, such as collaborating on research and ensuring scientific findings are disseminated in usable formats.
CERN has 20 years of experience monitoring and researching Chinese ecosystems through its network of 42 stations. It conducts long-term experiments on issues like nutrient management, habitat restoration, and climate change impacts. CERN also demonstrates ecosystem management models, such as controlling soil and water loss on the Loess Plateau and restoring degraded grasslands. The speaker hopes to strengthen collaborations between CERN and other international networks through joint projects, staff exchanges, and workshops.
The document provides an overview of collaboration at the James Hutton Institute. It discusses the benefits of collaboration, including drawing on a wider pool of skills and knowledge to address complex issues. It also mentions transferring knowledge and skills, extending research networks, and wider dissemination of outcomes. The document provides examples of recent collaborations across the research sector and acknowledges those involved in collaboration efforts.
This document provides a summary of a book titled "Yellowstone's Wildlife in Transition" which evaluates the effectiveness of ecological process management in sustaining processes in Yellowstone National Park. The book was edited by experts from Yellowstone National Park and Montana State University and contains research from 32 contributors on topics like population dynamics, migration, effects of exotic species, climate change, and more. It finds that while ecosystem management has helped restore nature, expectations of preserving historical conditions are difficult due to human impacts and climate change. The editors suggest minimal interference could continue in wilderness areas but other areas may require more intervention to address issues like invasive species or changing communities.
IARU Global Challenges 2014 Cornell Tracking our declineSarah Cornell
There is growing attention to the global risks - not just local impacts - of present rates of biodiversity loss. It is worth keeping in mind that 'biodiversity loss' actually means the destruction (sometimes irreversible) – by us, people – of living organisms, Earth's 'genetic library', species, ecosystems and habitats. The fact that ecosystems are complex, adaptive, and locally specific means they can't be adequately represented in a single global measure. But without any overarching global perspective on losses, the locally contingent measures are 'untethered' to the real risks of systemic change. Scientists of many kinds are rising to the transdisciplinary challenge of dealing with this complexity in the face of global drivers of change (climate change, development pressures), recognizing that it is a challenge for everyone, not just academia.
2.4 biomes zonation and succession notesBrad Kremer
The document discusses key concepts relating to biomes, zonation, and succession. It begins by defining biomes as groups of ecosystems with similar climates that can be classified into aquatic, forest, grassland, desert, or tundra. Each biome has characteristic limiting factors, productivity, and biodiversity. The document then discusses zonation, succession, and how climate change is altering biome distribution and causing shifts. It also addresses the concepts of pioneer, intermediate, and climax communities in succession and how this relates to ecosystem stability, diversity, and resilience over time.
State Action Plan June 2013 Briefing, Doug Beard, USGS National Climate Change and Wildlife. Department of Interior Climate Science Centers and National Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center
- Climate change has led to earlier springs and vegetation growth over the past 27 years, advancing by 0.6 days per year. However, birth timing in roe deer did not advance to match this, remaining stable.
- As a result, the mismatch between birth timing and peak vegetation/resource availability increased by 0.54 days per year, reaching 36 days in 2011.
- Earlier birth timing is favored by selection as it increases early fawn survival, but birth timing shows limited heritability and plasticity in roe deer.
- Increased mismatch led to lower cohort survival, with a 40% decrease in survival for every 1 month increase in mismatch. Individual early survival also decreased linearly once mismatch exceeded 16
El documento describe un proyecto inmobiliario de apartamentos en Rionegro con acabados de alta calidad como pisos de cerámica, puertas de roble, cocinas integrales con mesón de mármol y ventanas de aluminio. Los apartamentos tienen entre 75 y 81 metros cuadrados con 2 habitaciones, 2 baños, sala comedor y balcón. Se ofrece un garaje opcional por $9 millones y se aceptan propuestas de forma de pago.
GOLDEN TIJUCA, alto luxo pronto pra morar na Tijuca Nobre.Marcelo Maia
O documento apresenta um projeto imobiliário chamado Golden Tijuca localizado na Rua Marquês de Valença, Tijuca, Rio de Janeiro. O empreendimento oferece apartamentos de 3 e 4 quartos entre 94 e 114m2, além de coberturas, com diversas opções de lazer como piscinas, salão de festas, academia e brinquedoteca.
Este documento presenta varios sistemas constructivos innovadores como la construcción modular industrializada y el uso creciente de la madera en la construcción de viviendas. También describe cómo la empresa Arup ha adoptado el modelado de información de construcción (BIM) utilizando Revit Structure para mejorar la coordinación entre disciplinas, entregar documentación de mayor calidad y reducir los tiempos y costos de los proyectos.
El documento presenta una lista de libros profesionales de arquitectura y construcción ofrecidos por Marketlibro, incluyendo libros sobre proyectos constructivos, casas modernas, diseño interior, paisajismo, ingeniería civil, materiales de construcción y más. Proporciona información de contacto para Marketlibro.
This document discusses implementing environmental research and education over the next decade. It emphasizes the need to improve understanding of complex socio-environmental systems through integrated research across disciplines like the natural sciences, social sciences, and engineering. Specifically, it calls for sustaining programs that study these complex systems through experiments, observations, and modeling. It also discusses the importance of sharing knowledge with society through education and communication. Overall the document provides a framework to guide environmental research and education investments at the National Science Foundation over the next 10 years.
Studying tropical rainforest ecology in malaysiaMark McGinley
The document provides an overview of long-term ecological research (LTER) being conducted in tropical rainforests, with a focus on sites in Malaysia. It describes several long-term forest plot sites, including Danum Valley, Lambir Hills, and Pasoh, which are part of broader networks like the Center for Tropical Forest Science and Long Term Ecological Research. At each site, teams of scientists conduct long-term research on topics like forest structure and composition, species diversity, and the impacts of disturbance. The research helps increase understanding of rainforest ecology and informs sustainable forest management.
[Ostrom, 2009] a general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-e...FiorellaIsabelCampos1
This document presents a framework for analyzing the sustainability of social-ecological systems (SESs). The framework identifies four core subsystems that interact within an SES: resource systems, resource units, governance systems, and users. It then identifies 10 variables within these subsystems that are frequently found to affect the likelihood of users self-organizing to manage resources and achieve sustainability. These variables influence the perceived costs and benefits of investing in governance systems, such as the size of the resource system, its productivity, clarity of system boundaries, and collective-choice arrangements. The framework is intended to facilitate multidisciplinary analysis of complex SESs by providing a common structure for organizing knowledge about factors influencing sustainability.
This document summarizes the goals and phases of the Mathematics and Informatics for Environmental ‘Omic Data Synthesis (‘Omics) TAP program. The program has five phases: 1) NERC consultation, 2) forming an advisory group, 3) administering bioinformatics fellowships, 4) building an environmental ‘omics network, and 5) wrapping up the program. All phases aim to establish the Environmental ‘Omics Synthesis (EOS) centre to synthesize ‘omics data as recommended by the NEOMICS strategy through building collaborations between researchers. The advisory group will oversee administering fellowships focused on using ‘omics to address challenges in understanding biodiversity, evolution, genetics, ecosystems, and more. The
This document discusses the Future Earth and Health Knowledge-Action Network (KAN). It summarizes that:
1) The KAN was motivated by the Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission report recognizing the need to study planetary health and the links between environmental and human health.
2) The KAN aims to support transdisciplinary research with stakeholders to improve understanding of health-environment links and find holistic solutions to global challenges.
3) Initial priority research themes identified include land use change and disease risk, food systems and nutrition, urbanization and health, energy and air quality, and disasters and extreme events.
A presentation given at the WLE Ganges Focal Region writeshop in 2014 on the Ecosystem Services and Resilience Framework (ESR). Put together and presented by Sarah Jones of Bioversity International.
Living in the Anthropocene: Science, Sustainability, and Societytewksjj
This document discusses the role of science in addressing sustainability challenges in the Anthropocene era. It argues that science needs to focus on systems and solutions, conduct research with societal partners, and ensure its findings are effectively communicated and applied to policy and business. The document proposes that Future Earth establish knowledge-action networks and a global boundary organization to facilitate co-designed, transdisciplinary research on issues like food, water, energy systems, cities, and the climate crisis. The goal would be to generate science, solutions, and services to achieve sustainability objectives like healthy ecosystems and equitable societies.
The document summarizes environmental research and development funding by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for fiscal year 2013. It provides details on funding amounts and percentages for various EPA offices and programs, including the Office of Research and Development and its research programs in areas such as air/climate/energy, chemical safety, human health risk assessment, homeland security, and water resources. It describes the goals and objectives of research conducted by each program. Overall funding for EPA R&D in FY2013 is estimated at $550 million, a slight decrease from FY2012.
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE THE SMITHSONIAN INS...Lyle Birkey
The Smithsonian Institution receives federal funding for environmental research and development through four main programs: 1) The Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute ($12 million), which conducts biodiversity research in Panama. 2) The Smithsonian Environmental Research Center ($4 million), which performs Chesapeake Bay ecosystem research. 3) The Smithsonian National Zoological Park ($2 million), including conservation research at its Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute. 4) The National Museum of Natural History ($18 million), housing environmental research departments and facilities.
This systematic review examines pathways to recover from open defecation (OD) in communities that have achieved open defecation free (ODF) status through community-led total sanitation and hygiene (CLTSH) interventions. The review assesses outcomes and impacts of ODF status on disease reduction, identifies challenges that can lead to ODF reversion, and explores options for maintaining ODF status over the long term. A comprehensive search of published and unpublished literature from 2007 to 2018 in multiple languages and databases was conducted. Key findings related to CLTSH implementation characteristics, obstacles to maintaining ODF status, and recommendations for effective long-term ODF are discussed.
Presented by Jeff Gilbert at a meeting on sharing the experiences on the application of One Health approaches in China, Beijing, China, 8-9 August 2013.
2014 NSF Environmental R&D Report October 2014Lyle Birkey
The document discusses federal funding for environmental research and development by the National Science Foundation (NSF) in 2014. It provides an overview of NSF funding for environmental research across its Biological Sciences, Engineering, and Geosciences directorates, totaling $1.729 billion. Specifically, it details funding amounts and programs within the Biological Sciences divisions of Environmental Biology ($139M), Integrative Organismal Systems ($216M), and Biological Infrastructure ($90M).
John F. Schalles is a full professor in the Biology Department at Creighton University who specializes in remote sensing of aquatic ecosystems. He has over 30 years of experience conducting research using remote sensing to analyze phytoplankton, salt marshes, and other coastal environments. He has advised over 100 undergraduate students and 16 graduate students, and has received over $1.45 million in research funding from agencies like NSF, NASA, and NOAA.
FY 2013 R&D REPORT January 6 2014 - PreambleLyle Birkey
Federal funding for environmental research and development in the US totaled over $9 billion in 2013 according to this report. The report provides an overview of environmental R&D funding across multiple federal agencies, with the largest amounts going to the Department of Energy ($2.5 billion), National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($1.5 billion), National Science Foundation ($600 million), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ($400 million). It also summarizes programs within each agency that receive environmental R&D funding and the areas of focus for that research.
Eko Artificial Life, Determinacy of Ecological Resilience and Classification ...ijtsrd
Simulating the effects of biotic and a biotic interactions with or without human interference to compute ecological resilience within a closed ecosystem. Simulating a set food chain in the said ecosystem and studying the effects of biotic factors on the biotic chains and vice versa. Classifying and comparing various closed ecosystems on the said parameters and determinacy of the stability of an ecosystem over time. Study of various a biotic compound statistics via graphical representations in a time controlled order. Ability to introduce new species, remove existing ones or change the concentration amounts of current biotic parameters and thus study various results in a cause effect relationship. Time factoring and control over biotic gene pool to affect ecosystems on both a macro and micro scale. In depth latency about ecosystems in the gaming industry, weather simulators, and life perseverance of various endangered and threatened species along with sustainable resource control. Ankita Dhillon | Kirti Bhatia | Rohini Sharma "Eko: Artificial Life, Determinacy of Ecological Resilience and Classification of Closed Ecosystems" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-5 | Issue-5 , August 2021, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd46318.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/computer-science/bioinformatics/46318/eko-artificial-life-determinacy-of-ecological-resilience-and-classification-of-closed-ecosystems/ankita-dhillon
Eco cultural factors and ecological footprint as variables and measure of env...Alexander Decker
This document summarizes a study that investigated eco-cultural factors and ecological footprints as variables that measure environmental consciousness and accounting in Nigeria. The study examined factors like location, gender, education level, and age of respondents in two Nigerian locations. It found no significant differences in ecological footprints between urban and rural dwellers, males and females, or people of different education levels or ages. However, it observed serious environmental problems in the region from practices like uncontrolled bush burning and tree cutting that are greater threats than footprints. The study concludes there is a need for government policies to promote positive environmental attitudes and accountability.
Course DescriptionENVI110 is an introductory, interdisciplinary .docxfaithxdunce63732
Course Description
ENVI110 is an introductory, interdisciplinary science course for majors in the Department of Earth and Environmental Systems and for students wishing to satisfy their general education requirement for a science course with or without a lab [Science w/lab requirement of FS2010].
Both major and non-major students should be enrolled concurrently in ENVI 110L.
2 This course presents the environment as a complex, highly interrelated system of physical and biological processes that impacts virtually every sphere of human activity. We depend on the environment for basic necessities such as food, water, and the raw materials that we transform into shelter; we rely upon large-scale environmental processes that provide ecosystem services, such as the climate regulation and the natural flood control provided by forests and wetlands; and yet we also incur the sometimes catastrophic consequences of major environmental events, such as earthquakes, hurricanes and drought. Increasingly, human activity is altering these basic physical and biological environmental processes; the human population has more than doubled since 1960, and our economic activity in developed and developing countries has heightened our demand for limited environmental resources, such as arable land and clean water. Other consequences of increased human activity are less obvious, but no less consequential. It clearly benefits us to acquire a better understanding of this environment that we depend upon and influence so dramatically.
In this class we will explore the various processes that contribute to the functioning of the environment, as well as the ways we interact with it.
We will introduce topics using a case-studies approach, in which we use current news stories as a launching point for our science-based investigations. We will investigate the science of the environment, delving into how environmental issues and problems can be understood and addressed using the scientific method. Most importantly, we will focus on how you, whether a scientist or lay citizen, can take a scientific and informed approach to real -life decision making, whether in the workplace, marketplace or voting booth. Throughout, we emphasize the importance of using critical thinking and evidence to draw conclusions and suggest actions.
Course Goals (abbreviated S&L 1-4 for Science and Laboratory Learning Objectives and SAL 1-3 for Skill Applied Learning Requirements from the Foundational Studies Program)
Increase our knowledge about the scientific process and the importance of science in making informed and reasonable choices. (S&L 4)
Formulate hypotheses and interpret authentic data to evaluate those hypo theses. (S&L
1 and 2)
Develop critical thinking skills and critical analysis through problem solving of practical problems associated with the physical and biological environment. (SAL 1)
Advance our understanding of environmental science by applying basic principles of physics, chemi.
Similar to FY 2013 R&D REPORT January 6 2014 - National Science Foundation (20)
Learning Standards for Environment and Sustainability: Expressing leadership ...Lyle Birkey
The document discusses learning standards developed for environment and sustainability programs in Australia. It describes the process used to develop the standards which involved collaboration between 50 higher education institutions and over 250 stakeholders. The standards focus on four domains: technical and disciplinary knowledge, systemic understanding of human-environment interactions, skills for sustainability work, and ethical practice. The standards aim to provide minimum expectations while allowing flexibility for the diverse and transdisciplinary nature of environment and sustainability fields.
This document discusses challenges and strategies for integrating knowledge in interdisciplinary environmental and sustainability teams. It describes how conceptual distance between disciplines can hamper collaboration. Learning is key to connecting different bodies of knowledge, and theories like experiential learning, double-loop learning, and model-based reasoning can help explain learning processes for individuals and groups. Productive team practices include using boundary negotiating objects like visual models to facilitate knowledge sharing and the development of shared conceptual frameworks.
Preparing Students for Collaborative Leadership: Lowering the walls and cross...Lyle Birkey
Preparing Students for Collaborative Leadership: Lowering the walls and crossing boundaries using business-based professional assessments to develop interdisciplinary teams
The document discusses how top-down and bottom-up approaches to sustainability initiatives in universities can meet in the middle. It advocates for leadership from administrators and academics, infrastructure support from facilities, and sustainability champions across different levels. The key to success is institutionalizing sustainability efforts throughout the university through collaboration between various stakeholders rather than relying on individuals.
This document summarizes a study that analyzed the perspectives of 354 leaders of interdisciplinary environmental and sustainability degree programs. The leaders were surveyed about factors influencing their program's success. An exploratory factor analysis identified 9 key areas of influence, which a cluster analysis grouped into 3 views held by program leaders. View 1 leaders emphasized curriculum design, View 2 added an applied learning focus, and View 3 further emphasized external partnerships. The views differed in what factors were most important to success and leaders' program attributes. Challenges varied but included institutional support for all views and external engagement for View 3 programs.
This document summarizes a webinar presentation by Dr. Magdalena Muir on the UN's Sustainable Development Goals. The webinar covered the UN process of establishing the SDGs, the outcome document outlining 17 proposed goals, and several case studies providing examples and visions for implementing the goals. It discussed the European Commission's vision for the SDGs, emphasizing universality, sustainability, and accountability. It also briefly discussed approaches for financing SDG implementation through public-private partnerships.
This document outlines the program for the 2015 CCCAP Winter Conference focused on sustainable bridges to collaboration and partnerships. The conference will take place over two days and include sessions on CCAP strategic initiatives and goals, environmental education and research priorities, institutional self-assessment, overcoming obstacles to sustainability initiatives, and developing partnerships and resource sharing. Keynote speakers will discuss topics like time banking and the food-energy-agriculture nexus. Workshops aim to help member institutions identify challenges, best practices, and strategies for collaboration and leveraging resources. The program concludes with planning next steps for CCAP and the 2016 NCSE conference.
The document provides the program schedule for the 2015 CEDD Winter Conference held over two days. Day 1 includes a CEDD Executive Committee meeting and lunch, followed by an overview and discussion of CEDD initiatives and priorities. In the afternoon there are two workshops on "Mapping" and environmental education research and services. Day 2 begins with CEDD committee meetings followed by three workshops on funding creative approaches, sustainability certification, and interdisciplinary scholarship. The day concludes with discussion on future priorities and the 2015 summer conference.
The document outlines plans for a transportation campaign in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil leading up to the 2016 Olympics. The campaign aims to improve public transportation infrastructure and transparency around projects to ensure success for the Olympics. Key goals include having a functioning public transit system and growing tourism by 2016. Currently there is skepticism that projects will be completed on time. The campaign would address this through improved government communication, transparency around budgets, timelines and stakeholder involvement. The target audience is residents in Rio suburbs who could benefit from improved transportation. Strategies include educational media using celebrities, community meetings, and collecting public feedback to influence government policies and complete projects on schedule.
FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014Lyle Birkey
Federal funding for environmental research and development in fiscal year 2014 was $8.95 billion, a 7.8% increase from 2013. The top three agencies for funding were the Department of Energy, NASA, and the National Science Foundation, which together provided nearly two-thirds of total funding. Funding levels have remained relatively stable over the past 15 years, with the exception of a one-time boost in 2009 from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The goal of federal environmental research is to provide benefits to society such as more informed decision making, economic growth, public health improvements, and environmental education.
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE U.S. GLOBAL CHANGE ...Lyle Birkey
This document provides information on federal funding for environmental research and development by the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) in 2014. It discusses the USGCRP's mission, strategy, structure, and budget. Key points include:
- The USGCRP coordinates federal climate change research and is made up of 13 departments and agencies, led by NASA, NSF, and NOAA.
- The program's budget was $2.5 billion in 2014, with NASA accounting for 57% of funds and NSF and NOAA each receiving 13%.
- The USGCRP addresses climate change through 4 strategic goals and 12 interagency working groups on topics like observations, carbon cycle
Fy 2014 army corps environmental rd report october 21 2014 kdLyle Birkey
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers supports environmental research and development activities through its Engineer Research and Development Center. The Center focuses on areas like warfighter support, installations, environment, water resources, and information technology. It conducts research on ecosystem science, environmental resiliency, and issues like climate change through laboratories specializing in areas like the environment, coastal and hydraulic engineering, and cold regions. The Corps works to strengthen national security while protecting the environment and has a mission of delivering engineering services and reducing disaster risks.
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE THE U.S. DEPARTM...Lyle Birkey
The document summarizes federal funding for environmental research and development by the U.S. Department of Transportation in 2014. Key points include:
- The DOT allocated $59 million to environmental R&D across three administrations: the Federal Highway Administration ($16 million), Federal Aviation Administration ($29 million), and Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ($14 million).
- The Federal Highway Administration funded research on transportation planning, the natural and human environment, and project development.
- The Federal Aviation Administration funded research to reduce aviation's environmental impacts and develop more fuel efficient and sustainable operations.
- The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration funded research on pipeline safety technologies like leak detection and damage prevention.
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ...Lyle Birkey
The document discusses federal funding for environmental research and development by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) in 2014. It finds that the DOD spent $129 million on defense-wide environmental programs, including $62 million on the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program and $66 million on the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program. It also provides funding details for the Department of the Army ($40 million), Department of the Navy ($79 million), and Department of the Air Force ($1 million). The document contains a table summarizing these funding amounts and percentages changes from 2013 to 2014 for various DOD environmental research programs.
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL ...Lyle Birkey
This document summarizes federal funding for environmental research and development by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2014. It outlines the EPA's six major research areas and budgets for each. In 2014, the EPA's total budget for environmental research was $555 million. The largest shares went to research related to sustainable and healthy communities ($155 million), chemical safety and sustainability ($131 million), and safe and sustainable water resources ($111 million). The document provides details on the goals and programs within each research area.
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...Joshua Orris
Results of geophysics and pneumatic injection pilot tests during 2003 – 2007 yielded significant positive results for injection delivery design and contaminant mass treatment, resulting in permanent shut-down of an existing groundwater Pump & Treat system.
Accessible source areas were subsequently removed (2011) by soil excavation and treated with the placement of Emulsified Vegetable Oil EVO and zero-valent iron ZVI to accelerate treatment of impacted groundwater in overburden and weathered fractured bedrock. Post pilot test and post remediation groundwater monitoring has included analyses of CVOCs, organic fatty acids, dissolved gases and QuantArray® -Chlor to quantify key microorganisms (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, etc.) and functional genes (e.g., vinyl chloride reductase, methane monooxygenase, etc.) to assess potential for reductive dechlorination and aerobic cometabolism of CVOCs.
In 2022, the first commercial application of MetaArray™ was performed at the site. MetaArray™ utilizes statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and multivariate analysis to provide evidence that reductive dechlorination is active or even that it is slowing. This creates actionable data allowing users to save money by making important site management decisions earlier.
The results of the MetaArray™ analysis’ support vector machine (SVM) identified groundwater monitoring wells with a 80% confidence that were characterized as either Limited for Reductive Decholorination or had a High Reductive Reduction Dechlorination potential. The results of MetaArray™ will be used to further optimize the site’s post remediation monitoring program for monitored natural attenuation.
RoHS stands for Restriction of Hazardous Substances, which is also known as t...vijaykumar292010
RoHS stands for Restriction of Hazardous Substances, which is also known as the Directive 2002/95/EC. It includes the restrictions for the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. RoHS is a WEEE (Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment).
Microbial characterisation and identification, and potability of River Kuywa ...Open Access Research Paper
Water contamination is one of the major causes of water borne diseases worldwide. In Kenya, approximately 43% of people lack access to potable water due to human contamination. River Kuywa water is currently experiencing contamination due to human activities. Its water is widely used for domestic, agricultural, industrial and recreational purposes. This study aimed at characterizing bacteria and fungi in river Kuywa water. Water samples were randomly collected from four sites of the river: site A (Matisi), site B (Ngwelo), site C (Nzoia water pump) and site D (Chalicha), during the dry season (January-March 2018) and wet season (April-July 2018) and were transported to Maseno University Microbiology and plant pathology laboratory for analysis. The characterization and identification of bacteria and fungi were carried out using standard microbiological techniques. Nine bacterial genera and three fungi were identified from Kuywa river water. Clostridium spp., Staphylococcus spp., Enterobacter spp., Streptococcus spp., E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Shigella spp., Proteus spp. and Salmonella spp. Fungi were Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus flavus complex and Penicillium species. Wet season recorded highest bacterial and fungal counts (6.61-7.66 and 3.83-6.75cfu/ml) respectively. The results indicated that the river Kuywa water is polluted and therefore unsafe for human consumption before treatment. It is therefore recommended that the communities to ensure that they boil water especially for drinking.
Evolving Lifecycles with High Resolution Site Characterization (HRSC) and 3-D...Joshua Orris
The incorporation of a 3DCSM and completion of HRSC provided a tool for enhanced, data-driven, decisions to support a change in remediation closure strategies. Currently, an approved pilot study has been obtained to shut-down the remediation systems (ISCO, P&T) and conduct a hydraulic study under non-pumping conditions. A separate micro-biological bench scale treatability study was competed that yielded positive results for an emerging innovative technology. As a result, a field pilot study has commenced with results expected in nine-twelve months. With the results of the hydraulic study, field pilot studies and an updated risk assessment leading site monitoring optimization cost lifecycle savings upwards of $15MM towards an alternatively evolved best available technology remediation closure strategy.
Epcon is One of the World's leading Manufacturing Companies.EpconLP
Epcon is One of the World's leading Manufacturing Companies. With over 4000 installations worldwide, EPCON has been pioneering new techniques since 1977 that have become industry standards now. Founded in 1977, Epcon has grown from a one-man operation to a global leader in developing and manufacturing innovative air pollution control technology and industrial heating equipment.
Kinetic studies on malachite green dye adsorption from aqueous solutions by A...Open Access Research Paper
Water polluted by dyestuffs compounds is a global threat to health and the environment; accordingly, we prepared a green novel sorbent chemical and Physical system from an algae, chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle and impregnated with algae with chitosan nanocomposite for the sorption of Malachite green dye from water. The algae with chitosan nanocomposite by a simple method and used as a recyclable and effective adsorbent for the removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solutions. Algae, chitosan, chitosan nanoparticle and algae with chitosan nanocomposite were characterized using different physicochemical methods. The functional groups and chemical compounds found in algae, chitosan, chitosan algae, chitosan nanoparticle, and chitosan nanoparticle with algae were identified using FTIR, SEM, and TGADTA/DTG techniques. The optimal adsorption conditions, different dosages, pH and Temperature the amount of algae with chitosan nanocomposite were determined. At optimized conditions and the batch equilibrium studies more than 99% of the dye was removed. The adsorption process data matched well kinetics showed that the reaction order for dye varied with pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order. Furthermore, the maximum adsorption capacity of the algae with chitosan nanocomposite toward malachite green dye reached as high as 15.5mg/g, respectively. Finally, multiple times reusing of algae with chitosan nanocomposite and removing dye from a real wastewater has made it a promising and attractive option for further practical applications.
Presented by The Global Peatlands Assessment: Mapping, Policy, and Action at GLF Peatlands 2024 - The Global Peatlands Assessment: Mapping, Policy, and Action
Improving the viability of probiotics by encapsulation methods for developmen...Open Access Research Paper
The popularity of functional foods among scientists and common people has been increasing day by day. Awareness and modernization make the consumer think better regarding food and nutrition. Now a day’s individual knows very well about the relation between food consumption and disease prevalence. Humans have a diversity of microbes in the gut that together form the gut microflora. Probiotics are the health-promoting live microbial cells improve host health through gut and brain connection and fighting against harmful bacteria. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are the two bacterial genera which are considered to be probiotic. These good bacteria are facing challenges of viability. There are so many factors such as sensitivity to heat, pH, acidity, osmotic effect, mechanical shear, chemical components, freezing and storage time as well which affects the viability of probiotics in the dairy food matrix as well as in the gut. Multiple efforts have been done in the past and ongoing in present for these beneficial microbial population stability until their destination in the gut. One of a useful technique known as microencapsulation makes the probiotic effective in the diversified conditions and maintain these microbe’s community to the optimum level for achieving targeted benefits. Dairy products are found to be an ideal vehicle for probiotic incorporation. It has been seen that the encapsulated microbial cells show higher viability than the free cells in different processing and storage conditions as well as against bile salts in the gut. They make the food functional when incorporated, without affecting the product sensory characteristics.
Promoting Multilateral Cooperation for Sustainable Peatland management
FY 2013 R&D REPORT January 6 2014 - National Science Foundation
1. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
1
FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2012
T
An Exclusive service for Affiliates of the National Council For Science and the Environment
1. NationalScienceFoundation($1,604million)
he National Science Foundation (NSF) provides about one fifth of all federally support for basic
research conducted by America’s colleges and universities; and approximately half of non-
biomedical basic research. Approximately 77 percent of NSF funding goes to colleges and
universities. AllNSF R&D is classified as research and93 percentas “basic” research.
Source:OMB R&Ddata,Budgetofthe United StatesGovernment,agencybudgetjustification,agencybudgetdocuments,andhistoricaldata. Yearlyvaluesareadjustedfor
inflationusing OMB’sGDPdeflators.Nominalvaluesareunadjusted.
NSF awarded about 11,200 limited-term grants in 2011 to 1,875 universities, colleges and other
institutions. Grants have an average duration of three years. Most awards go to individuals or small
groups of investigators. Others provide funding for research centers, instruments and facilities. NSF
also supports science and engineering education, which is often connected to research grants.
NSF is organized around Directorates, each with a number of more specialized Divisions. The
NSF supports environmental research through all of its disciplinary Directorates, the Office of Polar
Programs, and a variety of integrative mechanisms. Some entire programs and Divisions fall within the
environmental research category.
An increasing number of NSF programs are collaborations between Divisions within and across
Directorates, across NSF as a whole (e.g. Global Change), and between parts of NSF and other federal
agencies (e.g., EPA, NOAA) and other entities within the U.S. and internationally. This is particularly
true of its efforts to promote interdisciplinary research necessary for improved understanding of
complex environmental and global change processes.
2. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
2
Environmental R&D at the National Science Foundation (budget authority in millions of dollars)
FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 12-13
Actual Actual Estimate Percent
Biological Sciences 446 439 419 -4.7%
Environmental Biology 143 143 134 -6.3%
Integrative Organismal Systems
1
213 212 205 -3.6%
Biological Infrastructure 90 84 81 -4.7%
Engineering 159 172 167 -2.6%
Chem, Bioeng, and Trans Sys 159 172 167 -2.6%
Geosciences 885 885 845 -4.5%
Atmospheric Sciences 258 259 245 -5.3%
Earth Sciences 184 183 174 -5.3%
Ocean Sciences 352 352 343 -2.5%
Integr & Collab Res & Edu 92 91 84 -8.1%
Polar Programs 177 179 172 -3.6%
Research & Education - - 132 127 -3.6%
Arctic Research Support - - 42 41
Antarctic Neutrino Observatory - - 3 3
Arctic Sciences 106 - - - - - -
Arctic Research Commission 2 1 1 -4.1%
Antarctic Sciences 69 - - - - - -
TOTAL 1,666 1,675 1,604 -4.3%
1
Figures include formerly separate Plant Genome Research beginning in FY 2011.
Source: AAAS estimates of R&D from OMB R&D data, Budget of the U.S. Government, and agency budget documents.
Figures are rounded to the nearest million. Changes calculated from unrounded figures. FY 2013 are estimates adjusted for
the full-year continuing resolution and sequestration
Biological Sciences ($419 million)
BIO’s mission is to enable discoveries for understanding life. The FY 2014 Request includes projects
on understanding the changing dynamics of the biosphere, research on the fundamental characteristics of
biological energy systems, and efforts to broaden participation and develop the next generation of biological
researchers. BIO continues support for Research at the interface of Biological, Mathematical and Physical
Sciences, and Engineering (BioMaPS). BIO also participates in several NSF-wide investment portfolios,
including advanced manufacturing through the Cyber-enabled Materials and Manufacturing and Smart
Systems (CEMMSS) activity; Cyberinfrastructure Framework for 21st Century Science, Engineering, and
Education (CIF21); Clean Energy investments; and Science, Engineering, and Education for Sustainability
(SEES).
Environmental Biology ($134 million)
DEB supports catalytic and transformative research to inventory and document life on earth, to
discover life’s origins and evolutionary history, and to understand the dynamics of ecological and
evolutionary systems, in four clusters:
The Ecosystem Science Cluster backs projects through the Ecosystem Studies Program, which
supports investigations of whole-system ecological processes and relationships across a diversity of
spatial and temporal (including paleo) scales in order to advance understanding of:
1. material and energy fluxes and transformations within and among ecosystems;
2. roles and relationships of ecosystem components in whole-system structure and function;
3. ecosystem dynamics, resilience, and trajectories of ecosystem change through time; and
4. linkages among ecosystems in space, time, and across spatial and temporal scales.
3. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
3
The Evolutionary Processes Cluster supports research on microevolutionary processes and their
macroevolutionary consequences. Topics include mutation, gene flow, recombination, natural
selection, genetic drift, assortative mating acting within species, speciation, and long-term features of
evolution. These investigations attempt to explain causes and consequences of genetically-based
change in the properties of groups of organisms (at the population level or higher) over the course of
generations as well as large-scale patterns of evolutionary change, phylogeography, origin and
maintenance of genetic variation, and molecular signatures of evolution at the population or species
level. The cluster seeks to fund projects that are transformative -- that is, those that will change the
conceptual bases of evolutionary biology and have broad implications for future research. Both
empirical and theoretical approaches are encouraged. The Cluster is comprised of two programs,
Evolutionary Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology (described below); proposals should be submitted to
one of these programs. The Cluster comprises two programs:
• The Evolutionary Genetics Program, which supports research that investigates the
genetic bases of micro- and macroevolutionary processes and their effects on
the evolution of genotypes and phenotypes.
• The Evolutionary Ecology Program supports research on the evolutionary causes
and consequences of ecological interactions (intra-specific, interspecific, and with
the abiotic environment).
The Population and Community Ecology Cluster supports research that advances the conceptual
or theoretical understanding of population ecology, species interactions and community dynamics in
terrestrial, wetland and freshwater habitats. This is done through the Population and Community
Ecology Program, which supports fundamental studies in the broadly defined areas of population and
community ecology. Topics include the population dynamics of individual species, demography, and
fundamental ecological interactions affecting populations, communities, and their environments.
Themes include, but are not limited to: population regulation; food-web structure and trophic
dynamics; competition, predation, mutualism and parasitism; mechanisms of coexistence and the
maintenance of species diversity; community assembly; paleoecology; landscape ecology;
conservation and restoration biology; behavioral ecology; and macroecology. The Program particularly
encourages studies that can be applied to a wide range of habitats and taxa across multiple spatial and
temporal scales.
The Systematics and Biodiversity Science Cluster supports research that advances our
understanding of the diversity, systematics, and evolutionary history of organisms in natural systems.
The Cluster comprises two core programs:
• The Biodiversity: Discovery & Analysis program supports all aspects of Biodiversity
Science, including expeditionary and exploratory research in natural environments to
advance the discovery, identification, description, classification and cataloguing of the
world’s biodiversity. These investigations should be focused at the organismal level and within
an evolutionary context.
• The Phylogenetic Systematics program supports research that addresses significant questions
about organismal evolution using phylogenetic approaches. The primary foci of this program
are to investigate the origins of biodiversity and to resolve the relationships among species
across the hierarchy of life.
In general, 51 percent of the DEB portfolio is available for new research grants. The remaining 49
percent funds continuing grants made in previous years.
4. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
4
IntegrativeOrganismalServices($205million)
IOS supports research and education aimed at understanding the diversity of plants, animals, and
microorganisms as complex systems interacting with their environments. Reaching a systems level
understanding of organisms will require a new emphasis on interdisciplinary approaches and
development of new tools. These approaches span computational, molecular, cellular, individual
organism and population levels of inquiry. Many activities supported by IOS focus on biological
processes that affect organismal development, structure, performance, and interactions under varying
environmental conditions. IOS-supported research focuses on investigating organismal performance
in an environmental context, which is significant for understanding reciprocal interactions between
living systems and the environment.
The Behavioral Systems Cluster consists of the Animal Behavior Program which
supports research in the area of integrative animal behavior to understand how and
why individuals and groups of animals do what they do in nature. Research in this area
occurs in field, laboratory and captive environments and covers a wide range of
scientific fields and levels of analysis to study the development, mechanisms, adaptive
value, and evolutionary history of behavior. The Cluster encourages species specific
and comparative studies as well as modeling and theoretical approaches that use
animal systems to discover and explore overarching principles of the biology of
behavior and to advance a fully integrated understanding of the behavioral phenotype
from genes to ecosystems.
The Developmental Systems Cluster supports research aimed at understanding how
interacting developmental processes give rise to the emergent properties of organisms.
Systems level approaches to understanding these processes at the molecular, cellular,
and organismal levels of organization, combining the use of molecular, genetic,
biochemical, and physiological techniques as well as techniques from outside biology
are encouraged. The Developmental Systems Cluster is also particularly interested in
understanding how emergent properties result in the development of complex
phenotypes and lead to the evolution of developmental mechanisms.
o The Plant, Fungal and Microbial Developmental Mechanisms Program
supports research that addresses developmental processes in plants from algae
to angiosperms, microbes and fungi.
o The Animal Developmental Mechanisms Program supports research that
seeks to understand the processes that result in the complex phenotypes of
animals.
o The Evolution of Developmental Mechanisms Program supports research
to discover the developmental processes that are shared by all organisms, and
also those processes that produce diversity (phenotypic variation within a
species and/or between species).
The Neural Systems Cluster focuses on the basic functions of the nervous system
and its interactions with the physical and social environments. The neuronal
mechanisms underlying organismal responses and adaptation to an ever-changing
biosphere are also of interest. The Cluster encourages the use of comparative species
approaches to better understand how organisms perceive their environment, transduce
that information in the nervous system and respond appropriately. Projects supported
by the Neural Systems Cluster span multiple levels of analysis ranging from the
molecular and cellular to the complex behavioral aspects of organisms functioning in
5. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
5
their natural environments.
o The Organization Program supports research focused on how the nervous
system is organized along developmental, genetic, molecular and cellular
lines; exploring developmental mechanisms and determining how
experiential/environmental interactions affect the basic structural and
functional characteristics of the nervous system.
o The Activation Program supports research focused on how signals from the
external environment activate the nervous system to produce motor responses;
investigating how the internal state of the organism reaches a decision
threshold, integrates sensorimotor responses, and triggers an action.
o The Modulation Program supports research focused on how various factors
modulate the nervous system to produce complex behavior, and how that
complex behavior, in turn, feeds back to have an impact on the nervous
system; examining basic neural mechanisms underlying neuroendocrine and
neuroimmune function, learning and memory, biological rhythms, and other
complex behavior.
The Physiological and Structural Systems Cluster (PSS) supports research to
advance understanding of physiological mechanisms and functional morphology. PSS
supports hypothesis- and discovery-based research encompassing a wide range of
approaches at levels of organization from molecules to populations. The Cluster
encourages submission of proposals aimed at identifying fundamental design
principles of physiological and structural systems and at understanding why particular
patterns of morphology and physiological mechanisms have evolved and how they are
integrated at the level of the whole organism.
o The Symbiosis, Defense and Self-recognition Program (SDS) supports
research on processes mediating both antagonistic and beneficial symbiotic
interactions, as well as mechanisms of self/non-self recognition within and
between species.
o The Physiological Mechanisms and Biomechanics Program (PMB)
supports research on the physiological and structural features that contribute
to life processes in plants, animals, microbes, and other organisms.
o The Integrative Ecological Physiology Program (IEP) supports research on
the structural and physiological traits of organisms that underlie their
capacities to live in various ecological settings.
This program is a continuation of the Plant Genome Research Program (PGRP) that
began in FY 1998 as part of the National Plant Genome Initiative (NPGI). Since the
inception of the NPGI and the PGRP, there has been a tremendous increase in the
availability of functional genomics tools and sequence resources for use in the study
of key crop plants and their models.
In general, 43 percent of the IOS portfolio is available for new research grants and 57 percent is
available for continuing grants.
BiologicalInfrastructure ($81 million)
DBI empowers biological discovery by supporting the development and enhancement of biological
research resources, human capital, and centers. In particular, DBI supports the development of, or
improvements to: research infrastructure, including instruments, software, and databases; and
improvements to biological research collections, living stock collections, and field stations and marine
6. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
6
labs. In addition, DBI funds the development of human capital through support of undergraduate,
graduate, and postdoctoral research experiences. Support of center and center-like activities creates
opportunities to address targeted but deep biological questions that have major societal impact. DBI
supports varied activities that provide the infrastructure for contemporary research in biology.
These include human resources and research resources.
The Human Resources Cluster includes research experiences for undergraduates
(sites), undergraduate mentoring in environmental biology, cross-disciplinary research
at undergraduate institutions, and, in selected disciplines, postdoctoral research
fellowships.
The Research Resources Cluster includes databases, the curatorial improvement and
computerization of research collections, living stock collections, the purchase of major
items of multi-user instrumentation, development of new instrumentation, and
improvement of research facilities at biological field stations and marine laboratories.
In general, 28 percent of the DBI portfolio is available for new research grants and 72 percent funds
continuing grants made in previous years.
Engineering ($167 million)
ENG provides about 32 percent of the federal funding for basic research in engineering at academic
institutions.
ENG is a global leader in identifying and catalyzing fundamental engineering research, innovation,
and education. To achieve this vision, the directorate leads in frontier engineering research, cultivates
an innovation ecosystem, develops the next-generation engineer, and demonstrates organizational
excellence. Since its inception, ENG has provided substantial support for frontier research and
education across all fields of engineering. ENG-funded basic and use-inspired research, combined with
the creativity of well-educated engineers and the resources of state-of-the-art facilities, have fueled
many important innovations that in turn have stimulated economic growth and improved the health and
quality of life for all Americans.
Many ENG programs and activities support national priorities and contribute to solutions to grand
challenges. ENG is central to several cross-Foundation investments designed to create the knowledge
and innovations required for these areas. These investments include Cyber-Enabled Materials,
Manufacturing, and Smart-Systems (CEMMSS); Innovation Corps (I-Corps); Science, Engineering,
and Education for Sustainability (SEES); and the Cyberinfrastructure Framework for 21st Century
Science, Engineering, and Education (CIF21).
ENG will be a major contributor in the CEMMSS investment through interdisciplinary research
in breakthrough materials and materials design, advanced manufacturing techniques and
processes, and smart systems research, including robotics.
The ENG role in SEES will continue with significant emphasis on Sustainable Research
Networks and Sustainable Energy Pathways, in addition to engineering research related to
sustainable synthesis, use, and reuse of chemicals and materials as part of the Sustainable
Chemistry, Engineering, and Materials (SusChEM) component.
ENG will build on its significant contributions to innovation programs in growing the evolving
I-Corps program to the next phase of establishing a platform for innovation, thus joining other
established innovation programs such as Partnerships for Innovation (PFI), Engineering
Research Centers (ERC), Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers (I/UCRC), and
others that are managed by ENG.
7. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
7
ENG leads the Foundation in strategic research investments focusing on research and education
in manufacturing in all its dimensions (advanced manufacturing, nanomanufacturing, and
transformative technologies for traditional manufacturing).
The ENG investment in CIF21 will build upon the directorate’s support of groundbreaking
work in cyber–physical systems, engineering modeling and simulation, smart networks, and
sensors.
The Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems (CBET)
($167 million) supports research to enhance and protect U.S. national health, energy, environment,
process manufacturing, and security. Research is conducted in biotechnology and the chemical,
environmental, biomedical, mechanical, civil, and aerospace engineering disciplines. To serve these
communities and achieve its goals, CBET has been organized into four thematic clusters: Chemical,
Biochemical, and Biotechnology Systems; Biomedical Engineering and Engineering Healthcare;
Environmental Engineering and Sustainability; and Transport and Thermal Fluids Phenomena. In
general, 67 percent of the CBET portfolio is available for new research grants and 33 percent supports
continuing increments for grants made in previous years.
The Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (CMMI) Division promotes cross-
disciplinary research partnerships at the intersections of traditional research disciplines to advance
transformative research results that promote innovative manufacturing technology; enable the design
and analysis of complex engineering systems; enhance the sustainability and resiliency of U.S.
infrastructure (for example, buildings, transportation, and communication networks); help protect the
Nation from extreme events; and apply engineering principles to improve the Nation’s service enterprise
systems, such as healthcare. In general, 76 percent of the CMMI portfolio is available for new research
grants and 24 percent supports continuing increments for grants made in previous years.
The Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems (ECCS) area supports fundamental
research of novel electronic and photonic devices, the integration of these devices into circuit and
system environments, and the networking of intelligent systems at multiple scales for applications
in energy, healthcare, disaster mitigation, telecommunications, environment, manufacturing, and
other systems-related areas. ECCS research and education investments emphasize interdisciplinary
collaboration and the convergence of technologies to take on major technological challenges for
the next generation of innovative devices and systems. In general, 67 percent of the ECCS
portfolio is available for new research grants and 33 percent supports continuing increments for
grants made in previous years.
Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (EFRI) funds interdisciplinary topics at the
frontiers of engineering research and education that have the potential for transformative impacts on
national needs and/or grand challenges. Recent EFRI topics have included areas such as: sustainable
energy sources; integrated systems designed to make U.S. infrastructures more resilient to disasters;
advances in robotics; manufacturing healthcare; and regeneration of some of the body’s most complex
tissues. In general, 92 percent of the EFRI portfolio is available for new research grants and 8 percent
supports continuing increments for grants made in previous years.
Engineering Education and Centers (EEC) programs are administratively managed within three
categories: (1) Major Centers and Facilities; (2) Engineering Education Research; and (3) Engineering
Career Development. The Major Centers and Facilities category is comprised of the signature ERC
program, NSECs, and a Science of Learning Center (SLC). They provide the framework for
interdisciplinary research and education, development, and technology transfer in partnership with
academia, industry, and government.
8. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
8
Geosciences ($845 million)
GEO supports basic research that advances the frontiers of knowledge and drives
technological innovation while improving our understanding of the many processes that affect
the global environment. These processes include the role of the atmosphere and oceans in
climate, the planetary water cycle, and ocean acidification. Support is provided for
interdisciplinary studies that contribute directly to national research priorities such as:
understanding, adapting to, and mitigating the impacts of global change; developing and
deploying integrated ocean observing capabilities to support ecosystem-based management; and
understanding future availability of fresh water. GEO provides about 61 percent of the federal
funding for basic research at academic institutions in the geosciences.
Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences ($245 million)
The mission of AGS is to extend the intellectual frontiers in atmospheric and geospace sciences by
making investments in fundamental research, technology development, and education that enable
discoveries, nurture a vibrant, diverse scientific workforce, and help attain a prosperous and sustainable
future. AGS supports activities to further our understanding of the physics, chemistry, and dynamics of
Earth’s atmosphere, from the Earth’s surface to the Sun, on timescales ranging from minutes to millennia.
AGS provides support for: 1) basic science projects and 2) the acquisition, maintenance, and operation of
observational and cyberinfrastructure facilities and services that enable modern-day atmospheric and
geospace science research activities.
Although the majority of AGS support is through individual investigator merit-reviewed
multi-year grants, the division also supports small-scale, limited-duration exploratory research
projects; collaborative or multi-investigator group projects focusing on a particular problem,
subject, or activity; large center or center-like projects; and funding for the research conducted at
facilities provided by the NSF-supported National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR),
which extends and enhances research at universities. More information on NCAR is available in
the Facilities chapter. The division will increase support in key areas of fundamental atmospheric
and geospace science, including dynamics and predictability of high-impact atmospheric and
space weather hazards, and support for research concerning the complex and dynamic
interactions among natural and human-driven processes in coastal areas through its contributions
to NSF’s Science, Engineering, and Education for Sustainability (SEES) activities of Hazards
SEES and Coastal SEES.
The main programs within AGS include:
The Atmospheric Chemistry program supports research to measure and model the
concentration and distribution of gases and aerosols in the lower and middle atmosphere. Also
supports research on the chemical reactions among atmospheric species; the sources and sinks
of important trace gases and aerosols; the aqueous-phase atmospheric chemistry; the transport
of gases and aerosols throughout the atmosphere; and the improved methods for measuring the
concentrations of trace species and their fluxes into and out of the atmosphere.
The Climate and Large-Scale Dynamics program aims to: (i) advance knowledge about the
processes that force and regulate the atmosphere’s synoptic and planetary circulation, weather
and climate, and (ii) sustain the pool of human resources required for excellence in synoptic and
global atmospheric dynamics and climate research.
Paleoclimate research on the natural evolution of Earth's climate with the goal of providing a
baseline for present variability and future trends through improved understanding of the
9. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
9
physical, chemical, and biological processes that influence climate over the long-term.
Physical and Dynamic Meteorology supports research involving studies of cloud physics;
atmo- spheric electricity; radiation; boundary layer and turbulence; the initiation, growth, and
propagation of gravity waves; all aspects of mesoscale meteorological phenomena, including
their morphological, ther- modynamic, and kinematic structure; development of mesoscale
systems and precipitation processes; and transfer of energy between scales. The program also
sponsors the development of new techniques and devices for atmospheric measurements.
The Aeronomy program supports research on upper and middle atmosphere phenomena of
ionization, recombination, chemical reaction, photo emission, and transport; the transport of
energy, and momentum. This program also supports research into mass in the mesosphere-
thermosphere-ionosphere system including the processes involved and the coupling of this
global system to the stratosphere below and magnetosphere above and the plasma physics of
phenomena manifested in the coupled ionosphere-magnetosphere system, including the effects
of high-power radio wave modification.
The Coupling, Energetics, and Dynamics of Atmospheric Regions (CEDAR) program
is a broad-based, community-initiated, upper atmospheric research program. The goal is to
understand the behavior of atmospheric regions from the middle atmosphere upward through
the thermosphere and ionosphere into the exosphere in terms of coupling, energetics, chemistry,
and dynamics on regional and global scales. These processes are related to the sources of
perturbations that propagate upward from the lower atmosphere as well as to solar radiation and
particle inputs from above. The activities within this program combine observations, theory and
modeling.
Geospace Environment Modeling (GEM) is a broad-based, community-initiated research
program on the physics of the Earth's magnetosphere and the coupling of the magnetosphere to
the atmosphere and to the solar wind. The purpose of the GEM program is to support basic
research into the dynamical and structural properties of geospace, leading to the construction of
a global Geospace General Circulation Model (GGCM) with predictive capability.
Magnetospheric Physics supports research on the magnetized plasma envelope of the outer
atmosphere, including energization by the solar wind; the origin of geomagnetic storms and
substorms; the population by solar and ionospheric sources; the origin of electric fields; the
coupling among the magnetosphere, ionosphere, and atmosphere; and waves and instabilities in the
natural plasma. Also supported are ground-based observational programs at high latitudes and
laboratory experiments applicable to the geospace environment. Theoretical research programs
may include numerical simulations using a variety of MHD, hybrid and particle codes. The
analysis of data from all sources, whether ground-based or from spacecraft, is also supported.
The Lower Atmospheric Observing Facilities (LAOF) Program consists of planning,
budgeting, coordination, and oversight of multi-user national facilities that are sponsored by
NSF for the geosciences research community. Program Management resides within ATM in the
UCAR and Lower Atmospheric Facilities Oversight Section (ULAFOS) which provides a
single point for coordination.
The Solar Terrestrial program supports research on the processes by which energy in diverse
forms is generated by the Sun, transported to the Earth, and ultimately deposited in the terrestrial
environment. Major topics include space weather impacts, helioseismology, the solar dynamo, the
solar activity cycle, magnetic flux emergence, solar flares and eruptive activity, coronal mass
ejections, solar wind heating, solar energetic particles, interactions with cosmic rays, and solar
10. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
10
wind/magnetosphere boundary problems.
EarthSciences($174million)
EAR supports fundamental research into the structure, composition, and evolution of the Earth, and
the life it has sustained over the four and a half billion years of Earth history. The results of this
research will lead to a better understanding of Earth's changing environment (past, present, and future);
the natural distribution of its mineral, water, biota, and energy resources; and provide methods for
predicting and mitigating the effects of geologic hazards, such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions,
floods, and landslides. EAR operates through two sections:
Deep Earth Processes Section (DEP)
• The Instrumentation and Facilities Program in the Division of Earth Sciences (EAR/IF)
supports meritorious requests for infrastructure that promotes research and education in areas
supported by the Division. AR/IF will consider proposals for: 1) acquisition or upgrade of
research equipment; 2) development of new instrumentation, analytical techniques or
software; 3) support of national or regional multiuser facilities; 4) support for early career
investigators.
• The EarthScope Program provides a framework for broad, integrated studies across the
Earth sciences, including research on fault properties and the earthquake process, strain
transfer, magmatic and hydrous fluids in the crust and mantle, plate boundary processes,
large-scale continental deformation, continental structure and evolution, and composition and
structure of the deep Earth.
• The Geophysics Program supports basic research in the physics of the solid earth to explore its
composition, structure, and processes from the Earth's surface to its deepest interior. Laboratory,
field, theoretical, and computational studies are supported. Topics include seismicity, seismic
wave propagation, and the nature and occurrence of geophysical hazards; the Earth's magnetic,
gravity, and electrical fields; the Earth's thermal structure; and geodynamics.
• The Petrology and Geochemistry Program supports basic research on the formation of
planet Earth, including its accretion, early differentiation, and subsequent petrologic and
geochemical modification via igneous and metamorphic processes. Proposals in this program
generally address the petrology and high-temperature geochemistry of igneous and
metamorphic rocks (including mantle samples), mineral physics, economic geology, and
volcanology.
Surface Earth Processes Section (SEP)
• The Human Resources Program (E&HR) facilitates activities that engage a wide range of
audiences in Earth Sciences research efforts, which are research experiences for
undergraduates and teachers; faculty early career development (CAREER); and EAR
Postdoctoral Fellowships.
• The Geobiology and Low-Temperature Geochemistry Program supports research on 1) the
interactions between biological and geological systems at all scales of space and time; 2)
geomicrobiology and biomineralization processes; 3) the role of life in the transformation and
evolution of the Earth's geochemical cycles; 4) inorganic and organic geochemical processes
occurring at or near the Earth's surface now and in the past, and at the broad spectrum of
interfaces ranging in scale from planetary and regional to mineral-surface and supramolecular;
5) mineralogy and chemistry of soils and sediments; 6) surficial chemical and biogeochemical
systems and cycles and their modification through natural and anthropogenic change; and 7)
11. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
11
development of tools, methods, and models for low-temperature geochemistry and
geobiological research - such as those emerging from molecular biology - in the study of the
terrestrial environment.
• The Geomorphology and Land-Use Dynamics Program supports innovative research into
processes that shape and modify landscapes over a variety of length and time scales. The
program encourages research that investigates quantitatively the coupling and feedback among
such processes, their rates, and their relative roles, especially in the contexts of variation in
climatic and tectonic influences and in light of changes due to human impact.
• The Hydrologic Sciences Program focuses on the fluxes of water in the environment that constitute
the water cycle as well as the mass and energy transport function of the water cycle in the
environment. The Program supports studying processes from rainfall to runoff to infiltration and
streamflow; evaporation and transpiration; as well as the flow of water in soils and aquifers and the
transport of suspended, dissolved and colloidal components. Water is seen as the mode of coupling
among various components of the environment and emphasis is placed on how the coupling is
enabled by the water cycle and how it functions as a process.
• The Sedimentary Geology and Paleobiology Program (SGP) supports research in a wide variety
of areas in sedimentary geology and paleobiology in order to comprehend the full range of physical,
biological, and chemical processes of Earth's dynamic system. The program supports the study of
deep-time records of these processes archived in the Earth's sedimentary carapace (crust) at all
spatial and temporal scales. These records are fingerprints of the processes that produced them and
continue to shape the Earth.
Ocean Sciences ($343 million)
The Division of Ocean Sciences (OCE) address the central role of the oceans in a changing Earth
and as a national strategic resource, as recognized in the President’s 2010 Executive Order establishing
a National Ocean Policy (NOP) and creating a National Ocean Council (NOC) to implement the
policy. OCE supports interdisciplinary research to better understand changing ocean circulation and
other physical parameters, biodiversity and the dynamics of marine organisms and ecosystems, and
changing ocean chemistry as exemplified by ocean acidification. OCE also supports research on the
geology of the ocean margins and sub-seafloor to investigate past ocean and climate conditions,
stability of methane hydrates, natural hazards associated with earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, and
microbial life deep below the seafloor.
Ocean Section
• The Biological Oceanography Program supports research in marine ecology broadly
defined: relationships among aquatic organisms and their interactions with the environments
of the oceans or Great Lakes. Projects submitted to the program for consideration are often
interdisciplinary efforts that may include participation by other OCE Programs.
• The Chemical Oceanography Program supports research into the chemical components,
reaction mechanisms, and geochemical pathways within the ocean and at its interfaces with
the solid earth and the atmosphere. Major emphases include: studies of material inputs to and
outputs from marine waters; orthochemical and biological production and transformation of
chemical compounds and phases within the marine system; and the determination of reaction
rates and study of equilibria. The Program encourages research into the chemistry,
distribution, and fate of inorganic and organic substances introduced into or produced within
marine environments including those from estuarine waters to the deep sea.
• The Physical Oceanography Program supports research on a wide range of topics
12. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
12
associated with the structure and movement of the ocean, with the way in which it transports
various quantities, with the way the ocean's physical structure interacts with the biological
and chemical processes within it, and with interactions between the ocean and the
atmosphere, solid earth and ice that surround it.
Marine Geosciences Section
• The Marine Geology and Geophysics program supports research on all aspects of geology
and geophysics of the ocean basins and margins, as well as the Great Lakes. The Program
includes:
• Structure, tectonic evolution and volcanic activity of the ocean basins, the
continental margins, the mid-ocean ridges, and island arc systems
• Processes controlling exchange of heat and chemical species between seawater and
ocean rocks
• Genesis, chemistry, and mineralogic evolution of marine sediments
• Processes controlling deposition, erosion and transport of marine sediments
• Past ocean circulation patterns and climates and
• Interactions of continental and marine geologic processes
• The Ocean Drilling program supports the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP),
an international scientific research program supported by 24 countries, advances
scientific understanding of the Earth by monitoring, drilling, sampling, and analyzing
subseafloor environments. IODP scientific objectives require a heavy vessel for drilling
deep sedimentary and crustal holes, a lighter vessel to provide widely distributed arrays
of high resolution cores to address climate, environmental, and observatory objectives,
and use of other drilling platforms, called Mission Specific Platforms (MSP's), for the
Arctic and shallow water projects which can't be undertaken from the two primary
IODP vessels.
Integrative Programs Section
• OCE Education supports efforts to integrate ocean research and education via three main
program areas, which are: 1) Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site Program.
This program provides funding to Universities and Marine Laboratories that allows them to
offer summer internships to undergraduate students who would like to participate in ocean-
related research efforts. Proposals may be submitted annually (August deadline). 2) Faculty
Early Career Development (CAREER). This program supports pre-tenure researchers who
would like to combine their research efforts with excellent educational programs. Proposals
may be submitted annually (July deadline). 3) Centers for Ocean Education Excellence
(COSEE), supports partnerships between ocean science researchers, educators, and informal
science organizations, providing the public a deeper understanding of the ocean and its
influence on each person's quality of life and our national prosperity.
• The Oceanographic Technology and Interdisciplinary Coordination (OTIC) Program
supports a broad range of research and technology development activities. Unsolicited
proposals are accepted for instrumentation development that has broad applicability to ocean
science research projects and that enhance observational, experimental or analytical
capabilities of the ocean science research community. Specific announcements for funding
opportunities are made for additional projects involving Improvements in Facilities,
Communications, and Equipment at Biological Field Stations and Marine Laboratories
(FSML) and the National Ocean Partnership Program.
• The Oceanographic Technology and Interdisciplinary Coordination (OTIC) Program
supports a broad range of research and technology development activities. Unsolicited
13. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
13
proposals are accepted for instrumentation development that has broad applicability to ocean
science research projects and that enhance observational, experimental or analytical
capabilities of the ocean science research community. Specific announcements for funding
opportunities are made for additional projects involving Improvements in Facilities,
Communications, and Equipment at Biological Field Stations and Marine Laboratories
(FSML) and the National Ocean Partnership Program.
Other OCE special funding opportunities include:
• Improvements in Facilities, Communications, and Equipment at Biological Field Stations and
Marine Laboratories (FSML). Biological Field Stations and Marine Laboratories (FSMLs) are
off-campus facilities for research and education conducted in the natural habitats of terrestrial,
freshwater, and marine ecosystems. FSMLs support environmental and basic biological research
and education by preserving access to study areas and organisms, by providing facilities and
equipment in close proximity to those study areas, and by fostering an atmosphere of mutual
scientific interest and collaboration in research and education. To fulfill these roles, FSMLs must
offer modern research and educational facilities, equipment, communications and data
management systems for a broad array of users. In recognition of the importance of FSMLs in
modern biology, NSF invites proposals that address these general goals of FSML improvement.
• Paleo Perspectives on Climate Change (P2C2). The goal of research funded under the
interdisciplinary P2C2 solicitation is to utilize key geological, chemical, atmospheric (gas in
ice cores), and biological records of climate system variability to provide insights into the
mechanisms and rate of change that characterized Earth's past climate variability, the
sensitivity of Earth's climate system to changes in forcing, and the response of key
components of the Earth system to these changes.
• To address ecological questions that cannot be resolved with short-term observations or
experiments, NSF established the Long Term Ecological Research Program (LTER) in 1980.
Three components differentiate LTER research from projects supported by other NSF
programs: 1) the research is located at specific sites chosen to represent major ecosystem
types or natural biomes; 2) it emphasizes the study of ecological phenomena over long
periods of time based on data collected in five core areas; and 3) projects include integrative,
cross-site, network-wide research.
InnovativeandCollaborativeResearchandEducation($84million)
ICER supports novel, complex, or partnership projects in both research and education. These
investments cut across traditional boundaries within the geosciences, encouraging interdisciplinary
activities and responding directly to critical needs of the entire geoscience community. ICER’s
principal goals are to develop innovative means to initiate and support geoscience education,
attract underrepresented groups to careers in the geosciences, foster the interchange of scientific
information nationally and internationally, and to join with other parts of NSF in major integrative
research and education efforts. In FY 2014, the division will make strategic investments in climate
research, international activities, education, diversity, and human resource development.
In general, 38 percent of the ICER portfolio is available for new research grants. The
remaining 62 percent funds continuing grants made in previous years.
ICER will support SEES activities totaling $17.25 million in FY 2014. Supported activities
will lay the foundation for technologies to mitigate, and adapt to, environmental change that
threatens sustainability, with an emphasis in FY 2014 on vulnerable regions in the Arctic and
14. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
14
along coasts. ICER will participate in activities to establish a robust suite of Sustainability
Research Networks, and in a program to identify clean energy sources and the impact of using
those sources on the environment and society.
ICER supports a varied portfolio of international collaborative activities. In FY 2014, this will
total $6.50 million, and emphasize collaborative research across the Americas and specific
research activities sponsored by the International Group of Funding Agencies for Global Change
Research.
In FY 2014, GEO is consolidating geoscience education and diversity support into the NSF-
wide CAUSE initiative. ICER houses GEO’s support for the CAUSE activity, which totals
$10.90 million in FY 2014. No other education efforts are supported by ICER in FY 2014.
ICER provides GEO’s contribution to the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network. In
FY 2014, this support decreases by $300,000, to a total of $300,000, as a previously supported
center refocuses its emphasis upon renewal.
Polar Programs ($172 million)
The Division of Polar Programs (PLR) is the primary U.S. supporter of, and serves NSF interagency
leadership responsibilities for, fundamental research in the polar regions. The Arctic Sciences section
supports research in social, earth systems, and a broad range of natural sciences; its Research Support &
Logistics program is driven by and responds to research by assisting researchers with access to the
Arctic and for engagement in planning and sharing of results with local Arctic communities. Antarctic
Sciences funds research for which access to Antarctica is essential to advancing the scientific frontiers,
including research in a broad array of geo- and bio-sciences, such as earth system science, as well as
space and astrophysical sciences that can only be achieved or are best achieved with work performed in
Antarctica and the Southern Ocean. Antarctic Infrastructure and Logistics enables research in Antarctica
on behalf of the U.S. Government through a network of stations, labs, equipment, and logistical
resources. The Environment, Safety, and Health section provides oversight for the environmental,
safety, and health aspects of research and operations conducted in polar regions.
The Antarctic Sciences area ($70 million) includes:
• The Antarctic Astrophysics and Geospace Sciences Program supports studies of three
major domains: Middle and upper atmosphere — mesosphere and thermosphere; near-Earth
solar wind, magnetosphere, and ionosphere; astronomy and astrophysical studies of the
Universe, including cosmic ray and solar physics.
• The Antarctic Earth Sciences Program supports research to provide insights into Antarctica's rich
history and lead to increased understanding of the processes that shape it today. AES encourages and
supports field, laboratory, and theoretical work in both terrestrial and marine settings in the fields of
geology, geophysics, and other areas of earth sciences.
• The Antarctic Glaciology program is concerned with the study of the history and dynamics of
all naturally occurring forms of snow and ice, including floating ice shelves, glaciers, and
continental and marine ice sheets. Program emphases include paleoenvironments from ice
cores, ice dynamics, numerical modeling, glacial geology, and remote sensing of ice sheets.
• The Antarctic Integrated System Science (AISS) program supports projects that transcend
disciplinary boundaries, are highly integrated and address the need for integrative
15. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
15
approaches to forge new understanding of the complex interactions that govern Antarctica
and its past, present and future roles in the earth system.
• The Antarctic Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences program is intended to improve
understanding of the oceanic environment at high latitudes, including global exchange of
heat, salt, water, and trace elements, sea-ice dynamics, and tropospheric chemistry and
dynamics.
• The Antarctic Organisms and Ecosystems Program aims to improve understanding of
organisms and their interactions within the biosphere and geosphere. The program
supports projects directed at all levels of biological organization from molecular,
cellular, and organismal, to communities and ecosystems up to regional and global
scales. Investigators are encouraged to develop and apply theory and innovative
technologies to understand how organisms adapt to and live in high-latitude
environments and how populations and ecosystems may respond to global change.
• The Arctic Natural Sciences (ANS) Program supports disciplinary and
interdisciplinary research on arctic processes and phenomena, with particular emphasis
on understanding the changing arctic environment. The Program encourages proposals
that test hypotheses leading to new understanding of the Arctic and the development of
predictive tools. Although proposals to perform monitoring per se are discouraged, the
program welcomes proposals that use the data generated by the Arctic Observing
Network to advance scientific understanding of the Arctic.
• The Arctic Observing Network (AON) enables the environmental observing
infrastructure required for the scientific investigation of Arctic environmental system
change and its global connections. AON encompasses physical, biological, social,
cultural, and economic observations, including indigenous knowledge, of the land,
ocean, atmosphere (troposphere and stratosphere) and social systems
• The Arctic Research Support and Logistics (RSL) Program supports the field
component of research projects funded through science programs in the Arctic Sciences
Section of the Division of Polar Programs and through other programs at National
Science Foundation (NSF).
• The Arctic Social Sciences Program (ASSP) encompasses all social sciences
supported by NSF. These include, but are not limited to anthropology, archaeology,
economics, geography, linguistics, political science, psychology, science and technology
studies, sociology, traditional knowledge and related subjects.
• The Arctic System Science Program (ARCSS) funds proposals or groups of proposals
that advance our understanding of the Arctic as a system. ARCSS projects are often
interdisciplinary and focus on the relationships among the physical, biological, chemical,
and human processes that govern the cycling of energy and matter in the arctic system.
The cycles of carbon, water, and energy are important to consider in investigating the
functioning of the arctic system.
Science, Engineering and Education for Sustainability (SEES)
Note: Funding for SEES initiatives comes through the directorates.
16. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
16
NSF’s Science, Engineering, and Education for Sustainability (SEES) activities aim to “advance
science, engineering, and education to inform the societal actions needed for environmental and eco-
nomic sustainability and sustainable human well-being” through support for interdisciplinary research
and education.
Fundamental to all sustainability research is the simultaneous consideration of social, economic, and
environmental systems and the long-term viability of those systems. Concepts that underlie the science
of sustainability include complex adaptive systems theory, emergent behavior, multi-scale processes, as
well as the vulnerability, adaptive capacity, and resilience of coupled human-environment systems. An
important research goal is to understand how patterns and processes at the local and regional scales are
shaped by-and feed into-processes and patterns that manifest at the global scale over the long term.
These topics guide research to explore alternate ways of managing the environment, migrating from
finite resources to renewable or inexhaustible resources, and applying technology to improve human
well-being. Conceptual frameworks for sustainability, including general theories and models, are criti-
cally needed for such informed decision-making.
SEES activities span the entire range of scientific domains at NSF and aim to: 1) support interdis-
ciplinary research and education that can facilitate the move towards global sustainability; 2) build
linkages among existing projects and partners and add new participants in the sustainability research
enterprise; and 3) develop a workforce trained in the interdisciplinary scholarship needed to under-
stand and address the complex issues of sustainability.
SEES Portfolio of Programs:
• Dimensions of Biodiversity. This campaign seeks to transform how we describe and under-
stand the scope and role of life on Earth; it promotes novel, integrated approaches to identify
and understand the evolutionary and ecological significance of biodiversity amidst the
changing environment of the present day and in the geologic past. This campaign takes a broad
view of biodiversity, and currently focuses on the integration of genetic,
taxonomic/phylogenetic, and functional dimensions of biodiversity. While this focus
complements several core NSF programs, it differs by requiring that multiple dimensions of
biodiversity be addressed simultaneously, in innovative or novel ways, to understand their
synergistic roles in critical ecological and evolutionary processes. (NSF 12-528)
• Climate Change Education (CCE): Climate Change Education Partnership (CCEP) Pro-
gram, Phase II (CCEP-II). The CCEP Program seeks to establish a coordinated national net-
work of regionally- or thematically-based partnerships devoted to increasing the adoption of
effective, high quality educational programs and resources related to the science of climate
change and its impacts. This solicitation is for proposals for (CCEP-II). CCEP-II awardees will
receive up to 5 years of funding to support full-scale implementation of mature and robust
strategic plans already developed by regional or thematic partnerships to improve climate
change education activities at a significant scale and meet the goals of the CCE program. (NSF
12-523)
• Ocean Acidification (OA). The goal of this solicitation is to understand a) the
geochemistry and biogeochemistry of ocean acidification; b) how ocean acidification
interacts with biological and physical processes at the organismal level, and how such
interactions impact the structure and function of ecosystems; and c) how the earth system
history informs our understanding of the effects of ocean acidification on the present day and
future ocean. (Most recent solicitation: NSF 12-500)
• Sustainable Energy Pathways (SEP). SEP calls for innovative, interdisciplinary basic research
in SEES by teams of researchers for developing systems approaches to sustainable energy
17. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
17
pathways based on a comprehensive understanding of the scientific, technical, environmental,
economic, and societal issues. The SEP solicitation considers scalable approaches for sustain-
able energy conversion to useful forms, as well as its storage, transmission, distribution, and
use. (NSF 11-590)
• Science, Engineering and Education for Sustainability Fellows (SEES Fellows). Through
SEES Fellows, NSF seeks to enable the discoveries needed to inform actions that lead to
environmental, energy and societal sustainability while creating the necessary workforce to
address these challenges. (Most recent solicitation: NSF 11-575)
• Sustainability Research Networks. The goal of the Sustainability Research Networks (SRN)
competition is to support the development and coalescence of entities to advance
collaborative research that addresses questions and challenges in sustainability science,
engineering, and education. (Most recent solicitation: NSF 11-574)
• Partnerships for International Research and Education (PIRE). The primary goal of PIRE
is to support high quality projects in which advances in research and education could not
occur without international collaboration. The FY 2012 PIRE competition will be focused
exclusively on the NSF-wide SEES investment area. (Most recent solicitation: NSF 11-564)
• Water Sustainability and Climate. The goal of the WSC program is to enable new
interdisciplinary paradigms in water research, which broadly integrate across the biological
sciences, geosciences, engineering, and social sciences to address water systems in their
entirety. (Most recent solicitation: NSF 11-551)
• Research Coordination Networks (RCN). The goal of the RCN program is to advance a field
or create new directions in research or education. Groups of investigators will be supported
to communicate and coordinate their research, training and educational activities across
disciplinary, organizational, geographic and international boundaries. The program has a
SEES track. (NSF 11-531)
• Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems (CNH). This program promotes
interdisciplinary analyses of relevant human and natural system processes and complex
inter- actions among human and natural systems at diverse scales. The most recent revision
of the solicitation included special emphasis on SEES related proposals. (Most recent
solicitation: NSF 10-612)
Programs that have approaching deadlines include:
• Arctic SEES (ArcSees). ArcSEES is a multi-year, interdisciplinary program which seeks both
fundamental research that improves our ability to evaluate the sustainability of the Arctic
human-environmental system as well as integrated efforts which will provide community-
relevant sustainability pathways and engineering solutions. For this competition, interdisci-
plinary research will be focused in four thematic areas: the natural and living environment, the
built environment, natural resource development, and governance. (NSF 12-553) Deadline:
September 14, 2012
• Decadal and Regional Climate Prediction Using Earth System Models (EaSM). This in-
terdisciplinary grand challenge calls for the development of next-generation Earth System
Models that include coupled and interactive representations of ecosystems, agricultural work-
ing lands and forests, urban environments, biogeochemistry, atmospheric chemistry, ocean
and atmospheric currents, the water cycle, land ice, and human activities. (NSF 12-522)
Deadline: May 12, 2012
18. FederalFundingforEnvironmentalResearchandDevelopment2013
18
In FY 2013, there will be an official solicitation on Oceans and Coastal Environments.
FurtherReading
• National Science Foundation, FY 2014 Budget Request to Congress
http://www.nsf.gov/about/budget/fy2014/pdf/EntireDocument_fy2014.pdf
• Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) http://www.nsf.gov/dir/index.jsp?org=BIO
• Directorate for Geosciences (GEO) http://www.nsf.gov/dir/index.jsp?org=GEO
• Directorate for Engineering (ENG) http://www.nsf.gov/dir/index.jsp?org=ENG
• Office of Polar Programs (OPP) http://www.nsf.gov/dir/index.jsp?org=OPP
• Science, Engineering and Education for Sustainability (SEES) http://www.nsf.gov/funding/
pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=504707