This document summarizes federal funding for environmental research and development by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2014. It outlines the EPA's six major research areas and budgets for each. In 2014, the EPA's total budget for environmental research was $555 million. The largest shares went to research related to sustainable and healthy communities ($155 million), chemical safety and sustainability ($131 million), and safe and sustainable water resources ($111 million). The document provides details on the goals and programs within each research area.
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ...Lyle Birkey
The document discusses federal funding for environmental research and development by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) in 2014. It finds that the DOD spent $129 million on defense-wide environmental programs, including $62 million on the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program and $66 million on the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program. It also provides funding details for the Department of the Army ($40 million), Department of the Navy ($79 million), and Department of the Air Force ($1 million). The document contains a table summarizing these funding amounts and percentages changes from 2013 to 2014 for various DOD environmental research programs.
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE U.S. GLOBAL CHANGE ...Lyle Birkey
This document provides information on federal funding for environmental research and development by the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) in 2014. It discusses the USGCRP's mission, strategy, structure, and budget. Key points include:
- The USGCRP coordinates federal climate change research and is made up of 13 departments and agencies, led by NASA, NSF, and NOAA.
- The program's budget was $2.5 billion in 2014, with NASA accounting for 57% of funds and NSF and NOAA each receiving 13%.
- The USGCRP addresses climate change through 4 strategic goals and 12 interagency working groups on topics like observations, carbon cycle
Fiscal Year 2014 NSF Environmental R&D Report October 2014Lyle Birkey
This document provides details on federal funding for environmental research and development by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in 2014. It shows that NOAA spent $666 million on environmental R&D in 2014, a 22.7% increase from 2013. The largest amount, $388 million, went to NOAA's Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, which funds climate research, weather and air chemistry research, and ocean/coastal/Great Lakes research. Other NOAA offices that received significant R&D funding included the National Ocean Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, and National Weather Service.
This document discusses human health risk assessment. It defines risk assessment as having two main types - quantitative risk assessment and environmental risk assessment. Environmental risk assessment includes human health risk assessment, where risk is defined as hazard times exposure. The document outlines the process of human health risk assessment, including determining exposure through intake calculations, establishing toxicity values from animal studies with uncertainty factors, and characterizing risk for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic chemicals by calculating hazard quotients and risk levels. The goal of risk assessment is to properly assess and manage risks to avoid health effects.
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE THE U.S. DEPARTM...Lyle Birkey
The document summarizes federal funding for environmental research and development by the U.S. Department of Transportation in 2014. Key points include:
- The DOT allocated $59 million to environmental R&D across three administrations: the Federal Highway Administration ($16 million), Federal Aviation Administration ($29 million), and Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ($14 million).
- The Federal Highway Administration funded research on transportation planning, the natural and human environment, and project development.
- The Federal Aviation Administration funded research to reduce aviation's environmental impacts and develop more fuel efficient and sustainable operations.
- The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration funded research on pipeline safety technologies like leak detection and damage prevention.
FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014Lyle Birkey
Federal funding for environmental research and development in fiscal year 2014 was $8.95 billion, a 7.8% increase from 2013. The top three agencies for funding were the Department of Energy, NASA, and the National Science Foundation, which together provided nearly two-thirds of total funding. Funding levels have remained relatively stable over the past 15 years, with the exception of a one-time boost in 2009 from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The goal of federal environmental research is to provide benefits to society such as more informed decision making, economic growth, public health improvements, and environmental education.
This document summarizes a health impact assessment of air quality and greenhouse gases/climate change for six Latino communities in San Jose, California. It finds that these communities experience higher levels of air pollution and associated health risks like cancer and respiratory illness due to proximity to stationary sources, highways, and vehicle traffic. Climate change is also expected to exacerbate air quality issues and increase heat-related illnesses in these vulnerable neighborhoods. The document recommends measures to reduce pollution exposure, greenhouse gas emissions, and environmental health inequities through the county general plan and environmental review process.
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ...Lyle Birkey
The document discusses federal funding for environmental research and development by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) in 2014. It finds that the DOD spent $129 million on defense-wide environmental programs, including $62 million on the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program and $66 million on the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program. It also provides funding details for the Department of the Army ($40 million), Department of the Navy ($79 million), and Department of the Air Force ($1 million). The document contains a table summarizing these funding amounts and percentages changes from 2013 to 2014 for various DOD environmental research programs.
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE U.S. GLOBAL CHANGE ...Lyle Birkey
This document provides information on federal funding for environmental research and development by the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) in 2014. It discusses the USGCRP's mission, strategy, structure, and budget. Key points include:
- The USGCRP coordinates federal climate change research and is made up of 13 departments and agencies, led by NASA, NSF, and NOAA.
- The program's budget was $2.5 billion in 2014, with NASA accounting for 57% of funds and NSF and NOAA each receiving 13%.
- The USGCRP addresses climate change through 4 strategic goals and 12 interagency working groups on topics like observations, carbon cycle
Fiscal Year 2014 NSF Environmental R&D Report October 2014Lyle Birkey
This document provides details on federal funding for environmental research and development by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in 2014. It shows that NOAA spent $666 million on environmental R&D in 2014, a 22.7% increase from 2013. The largest amount, $388 million, went to NOAA's Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, which funds climate research, weather and air chemistry research, and ocean/coastal/Great Lakes research. Other NOAA offices that received significant R&D funding included the National Ocean Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, and National Weather Service.
This document discusses human health risk assessment. It defines risk assessment as having two main types - quantitative risk assessment and environmental risk assessment. Environmental risk assessment includes human health risk assessment, where risk is defined as hazard times exposure. The document outlines the process of human health risk assessment, including determining exposure through intake calculations, establishing toxicity values from animal studies with uncertainty factors, and characterizing risk for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic chemicals by calculating hazard quotients and risk levels. The goal of risk assessment is to properly assess and manage risks to avoid health effects.
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE THE U.S. DEPARTM...Lyle Birkey
The document summarizes federal funding for environmental research and development by the U.S. Department of Transportation in 2014. Key points include:
- The DOT allocated $59 million to environmental R&D across three administrations: the Federal Highway Administration ($16 million), Federal Aviation Administration ($29 million), and Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ($14 million).
- The Federal Highway Administration funded research on transportation planning, the natural and human environment, and project development.
- The Federal Aviation Administration funded research to reduce aviation's environmental impacts and develop more fuel efficient and sustainable operations.
- The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration funded research on pipeline safety technologies like leak detection and damage prevention.
FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014Lyle Birkey
Federal funding for environmental research and development in fiscal year 2014 was $8.95 billion, a 7.8% increase from 2013. The top three agencies for funding were the Department of Energy, NASA, and the National Science Foundation, which together provided nearly two-thirds of total funding. Funding levels have remained relatively stable over the past 15 years, with the exception of a one-time boost in 2009 from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The goal of federal environmental research is to provide benefits to society such as more informed decision making, economic growth, public health improvements, and environmental education.
This document summarizes a health impact assessment of air quality and greenhouse gases/climate change for six Latino communities in San Jose, California. It finds that these communities experience higher levels of air pollution and associated health risks like cancer and respiratory illness due to proximity to stationary sources, highways, and vehicle traffic. Climate change is also expected to exacerbate air quality issues and increase heat-related illnesses in these vulnerable neighborhoods. The document recommends measures to reduce pollution exposure, greenhouse gas emissions, and environmental health inequities through the county general plan and environmental review process.
The Climate Change and Land -findings from the Fifth Assessment Report and up...ipcc-media
This document provides information about the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) and the Special Report on Climate Change and Land (SRCCL).
It begins with an overview of the timeline and structure of the AR6 cycle and then discusses the development of the SRCCL, including the scoping process, author selection, and outline. The SRCCL aims to provide an integrated analysis of the interactions between climate change, desertification, land degradation, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes.
Compared to previous IPCC reports, the SRCCL offers a more comprehensive perspective by analyzing multiple drivers of natural resource management related to food, water and energy security. It also examines land degradation from a food security lens
This 3 sentence summary provides the high level information from the document:
The document analyzes the Stern Review report on climate change policy and discusses key points such as the economics of choosing a goal for global action on climate change, the social cost of carbon, and conclusions from the report. It examines evidence that the benefits of strong early action on climate change outweigh the economic costs of inaction, and suggests stabilization goals for atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases between 450-550ppm CO2 equivalent.
The document is a comment letter from the Competitive Enterprise Institute to the EPA regarding its draft strategic plan. The letter argues that the plan implies the EPA intends to regulate carbon dioxide emissions, but that the EPA has no authority from Congress to do so. The letter provides several reasons from the Clean Air Act language and legislative history that show Congress did not give the EPA power to regulate greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and climate change. The letter urges the EPA to revise passages in its final strategic plan to remove any implication that it can or plans to regulate carbon dioxide emissions.
EnvEcon 2015 - Air Pollutant Marginal Damage Values Guidebook for Ireland DSS 1J. Andrew Kelly
This guidebook estimates the marginal damage values of five air pollutants in Ireland: nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxide, ammonia, non-methane volatile organics, and particulate matter. It finds the total health costs of air pollution in Ireland to exceed €2 billion annually, with over 700 premature deaths. The values are intended to incorporate the external costs of air pollution into policy analyses, but are conservative due to data limitations."
Lecture-2 Environmental Laws and Policies in Bangladesh - CopyShankor Paul
The document summarizes environmental laws and policies in Bangladesh, including:
1. The key environmental laws in Bangladesh are the Environment Conservation Act of 1995 and the Environment Conservation Rules of 1997. The Act aims to conserve the environment, improve standards, and control pollution.
2. The Environment Policy of 1992 outlines six objectives and identifies 15 priority sectors. It calls for strengthening legal and institutional frameworks to implement the policy.
3. The Department of Environment is responsible for enforcing environmental laws and policies. It issues environmental clearances required for new industrial projects.
Working with the IPCC: experiences from Sudanipcc-media
Sudan is committed to international climate change processes and actively participates in negotiations and the IPCC. Sudanese researchers have contributed extensively to IPCC reports and guidelines as authors, reviewers, and members of the IPCC Bureau. However, developing country researchers face challenges of limited funding, data and technical barriers. Active participation in the IPCC provides an educational experience and opportunities to conduct rigorous assessments, collaborate internationally, and contribute ongoing reports. Addressing challenges could enhance Sudan's climate research and representation in the IPCC.
The IPCC is an intergovernmental body established by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) that assesses scientific information related to climate change. It involves thousands of experts and government representatives and produces comprehensive assessment reports to inform climate policy. The IPCC aims to provide rigorous and balanced summaries of climate science in a policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive manner. Its reports have informed major international agreements on climate change including the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement.
A new bill passed by the New York State Assembly on March 6, 2013 that will ban hydraulic fracturing until May 2015 to allow more time to study the health effects of fracking--even though it's already been studied now for nearly five years in New York State. A transparent effort to permanently ban fracking in New York State.
This document outlines the Environment Conservation Rules of 1997 in Bangladesh. It includes regulations related to declaring ecologically critical areas, vehicles emitting harmful smoke, applications regarding environmental pollution, notices for collecting samples, procedures for environmental clearance certificates, determining environmental standards, fees, and reporting special incidents. It contains 14 rules and 14 schedules with standards and fees. The rules establish a classification system for industrial projects/units (green, orange A/B, red) and set procedures for environmental clearance depending on the category.
This presentation was given at the EPA’s National Water Event 2019, which took place on 29 and 30 May 2019 in Galway. This presentation by Mary Kelly from UCD is on the concept and principles of citizen science.
The Pakistan Environmental Protection Act of 1997 (PEPA 1997) was enacted to provide for the protection, conservation, rehabilitation and improvement of Pakistan's environment. It established regulations for environmental impact assessments, prohibitions on importing hazardous waste, and penalties for violations. PEPA 1997 formed the Pakistan Environmental Protection Council and environmental tribunals to help enforce the act and provide relief for environmental damages. It also requires proponents of projects that could harm the environment to file initial environmental examinations with regulatory agencies.
The letter from the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) comments on the EPA's draft strategic plan. The CEI is concerned that the plan implies an intention to regulate carbon dioxide emissions, which the organization believes the EPA has no authority to do. The letter argues that the plan uses misleading terminology by describing CO2 emissions as "air pollution" and climate change as an "air quality" issue. It also claims the plan contains regulatory signals about controlling greenhouse gas emissions in the future. The CEI asserts that Congress has not given the EPA authority over CO2 in the Clean Air Act and that the agency should not imply it has such power in the strategic plan.
Presentation by PK Joshi, International Food Policy Research Institute, at the CCAFS Workshop on Institutions and Policies to Scale out Climate Smart Agriculture held between 2-5 December 2013, in Colombo, Sri Lanka.
The document discusses ACCC II and risk-based adaptation planning. It describes workshops over 3 sessions to develop skills and methodologies for risk-based adaptation planning and integrating climate risk into socioeconomic planning. The objective is to produce risk-based approach guidelines that can apply to other sectors. Risk-based adaptation planning enables governments to incorporate climate resilience into development goals by addressing potential climate impacts or opportunities by sector. The document outlines ACCC II's risk-based adaptation planning roadmap and importance of linking adaptation plans to other relevant policy areas like emergency response and land use.
Lecture-3 The Challenges of Environmental polluion and Enforcement of lawsShankor Paul
The document summarizes environmental pollution and enforcement of environmental laws in Bangladesh. It discusses major challenges like water, air, and soil pollution from industrial waste, vehicles, and agriculture. Enforcement is challenging due to lack of awareness, reluctance of authorities, and inadequate resources. The Environment Court Act established environment courts, appeal courts, and special magistrate courts to try environmental cases. However, the system remains dependent on executives and has limited appeal options.
1. The document discusses the importance of oceans in providing climate information and the need to expand global ocean observing systems to improve understanding of climate change.
2. It highlights U.S. efforts to support developing an integrated global observing system, including commitments to assist other countries and fund ocean monitoring technologies like ARGO buoys.
3. The author argues that a comprehensive, sustained global observing system is necessary to generate reliable climate data and forecasts that can inform science-based policies around the world.
Global Disposal Inc. aims to increase universal waste collection rates to decrease toxic materials in landfills. A survey found that 32-33% of respondents improperly dispose of batteries, phones, and lightbulbs. If Global Disposal's 4,829 accounts each provide 10 pounds of universal waste, it could divert 4% of the 1,219,156 pounds otherwise landfilled. While the initial diversion is small, improved education can encourage more participation, further reducing environmental contamination from mercury and lead.
This document describes a study that developed indicators to identify potential priorities for reducing exposure to air pollutants in Canada. The indicators are based on emissions data from industrial facilities, transportation, and residential heating for 21 known and suspected carcinogens. The indicators, including total annual emissions and toxic equivalent emissions, are calculated for different regions of Canada to help identify pollutants and sources that may warrant further investigation and exposure reduction efforts. The regional analysis suggests that residents of Quebec and New Brunswick may face higher risks from industrial emissions, and that residential wood burning could be an important source to control, especially in northern and eastern Canada.
Adaptation options, needs, opportunities and associated costs: An African Con...ipcc-media
1) The document summarizes key findings from the IPCC's 5th Assessment Report regarding adaptation to climate change in Africa. It outlines increasing vulnerabilities, needs, and options for adaptation across sectors like water, agriculture, ecosystems, and health.
2) It notes that while awareness of climate risks and options is growing, translation to action remains a challenge. Mainstreaming adaptation into development is important to build synergies.
3) Costs of adaptation are estimated to reach billions annually by 2030, far more than current funding, indicating a large adaptation deficit. Successful implementation requires addressing institutional, financial, and knowledge barriers.
Sixth Assessment Report Cycle; Special Reports with Focus on Climate Change a...ipcc-media
The document outlines the Sixth Assessment Cycle of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It discusses the two upcoming special reports focusing on climate change and land, as well as ways to get involved in the IPCC process. The special reports will examine global warming of 1.5°C, the impacts on oceans and cryosphere, and the interactions between climate change and land. The Sixth Assessment Cycle will also include updated methodology guidelines and the three working group reports being released in 2021 and 2022.
MY SALES PEOPLE WON'T USE MY CRM! WHAT YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT.SalesScripter
Join Sales Growth Hub co-founder, Craig Klein, for a presentation on why sales people resist using CRMs, why CRM success is crucial to your business’ future and how to build a CRM your sales people love and your business can thrive with.
Enhancing the Human Phenotype Ontology for Use by the LaypersonErin D. Foster
The document describes efforts to enhance the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) by adding layperson synonyms to make it more useful and accessible for patients. The workflow involved systematically reviewing over 12,000 HPO classes, searching external sources to find additional lay synonyms, classifying the synonyms, incorporating the new synonyms into the HPO ontology file, and performing quality assurance checks. As a result of this work, 44% of synonyms in HPO are now classified as layperson terms, increasing its utility for applications involving patients.
The Climate Change and Land -findings from the Fifth Assessment Report and up...ipcc-media
This document provides information about the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) and the Special Report on Climate Change and Land (SRCCL).
It begins with an overview of the timeline and structure of the AR6 cycle and then discusses the development of the SRCCL, including the scoping process, author selection, and outline. The SRCCL aims to provide an integrated analysis of the interactions between climate change, desertification, land degradation, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes.
Compared to previous IPCC reports, the SRCCL offers a more comprehensive perspective by analyzing multiple drivers of natural resource management related to food, water and energy security. It also examines land degradation from a food security lens
This 3 sentence summary provides the high level information from the document:
The document analyzes the Stern Review report on climate change policy and discusses key points such as the economics of choosing a goal for global action on climate change, the social cost of carbon, and conclusions from the report. It examines evidence that the benefits of strong early action on climate change outweigh the economic costs of inaction, and suggests stabilization goals for atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases between 450-550ppm CO2 equivalent.
The document is a comment letter from the Competitive Enterprise Institute to the EPA regarding its draft strategic plan. The letter argues that the plan implies the EPA intends to regulate carbon dioxide emissions, but that the EPA has no authority from Congress to do so. The letter provides several reasons from the Clean Air Act language and legislative history that show Congress did not give the EPA power to regulate greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and climate change. The letter urges the EPA to revise passages in its final strategic plan to remove any implication that it can or plans to regulate carbon dioxide emissions.
EnvEcon 2015 - Air Pollutant Marginal Damage Values Guidebook for Ireland DSS 1J. Andrew Kelly
This guidebook estimates the marginal damage values of five air pollutants in Ireland: nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxide, ammonia, non-methane volatile organics, and particulate matter. It finds the total health costs of air pollution in Ireland to exceed €2 billion annually, with over 700 premature deaths. The values are intended to incorporate the external costs of air pollution into policy analyses, but are conservative due to data limitations."
Lecture-2 Environmental Laws and Policies in Bangladesh - CopyShankor Paul
The document summarizes environmental laws and policies in Bangladesh, including:
1. The key environmental laws in Bangladesh are the Environment Conservation Act of 1995 and the Environment Conservation Rules of 1997. The Act aims to conserve the environment, improve standards, and control pollution.
2. The Environment Policy of 1992 outlines six objectives and identifies 15 priority sectors. It calls for strengthening legal and institutional frameworks to implement the policy.
3. The Department of Environment is responsible for enforcing environmental laws and policies. It issues environmental clearances required for new industrial projects.
Working with the IPCC: experiences from Sudanipcc-media
Sudan is committed to international climate change processes and actively participates in negotiations and the IPCC. Sudanese researchers have contributed extensively to IPCC reports and guidelines as authors, reviewers, and members of the IPCC Bureau. However, developing country researchers face challenges of limited funding, data and technical barriers. Active participation in the IPCC provides an educational experience and opportunities to conduct rigorous assessments, collaborate internationally, and contribute ongoing reports. Addressing challenges could enhance Sudan's climate research and representation in the IPCC.
The IPCC is an intergovernmental body established by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) that assesses scientific information related to climate change. It involves thousands of experts and government representatives and produces comprehensive assessment reports to inform climate policy. The IPCC aims to provide rigorous and balanced summaries of climate science in a policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive manner. Its reports have informed major international agreements on climate change including the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement.
A new bill passed by the New York State Assembly on March 6, 2013 that will ban hydraulic fracturing until May 2015 to allow more time to study the health effects of fracking--even though it's already been studied now for nearly five years in New York State. A transparent effort to permanently ban fracking in New York State.
This document outlines the Environment Conservation Rules of 1997 in Bangladesh. It includes regulations related to declaring ecologically critical areas, vehicles emitting harmful smoke, applications regarding environmental pollution, notices for collecting samples, procedures for environmental clearance certificates, determining environmental standards, fees, and reporting special incidents. It contains 14 rules and 14 schedules with standards and fees. The rules establish a classification system for industrial projects/units (green, orange A/B, red) and set procedures for environmental clearance depending on the category.
This presentation was given at the EPA’s National Water Event 2019, which took place on 29 and 30 May 2019 in Galway. This presentation by Mary Kelly from UCD is on the concept and principles of citizen science.
The Pakistan Environmental Protection Act of 1997 (PEPA 1997) was enacted to provide for the protection, conservation, rehabilitation and improvement of Pakistan's environment. It established regulations for environmental impact assessments, prohibitions on importing hazardous waste, and penalties for violations. PEPA 1997 formed the Pakistan Environmental Protection Council and environmental tribunals to help enforce the act and provide relief for environmental damages. It also requires proponents of projects that could harm the environment to file initial environmental examinations with regulatory agencies.
The letter from the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) comments on the EPA's draft strategic plan. The CEI is concerned that the plan implies an intention to regulate carbon dioxide emissions, which the organization believes the EPA has no authority to do. The letter argues that the plan uses misleading terminology by describing CO2 emissions as "air pollution" and climate change as an "air quality" issue. It also claims the plan contains regulatory signals about controlling greenhouse gas emissions in the future. The CEI asserts that Congress has not given the EPA authority over CO2 in the Clean Air Act and that the agency should not imply it has such power in the strategic plan.
Presentation by PK Joshi, International Food Policy Research Institute, at the CCAFS Workshop on Institutions and Policies to Scale out Climate Smart Agriculture held between 2-5 December 2013, in Colombo, Sri Lanka.
The document discusses ACCC II and risk-based adaptation planning. It describes workshops over 3 sessions to develop skills and methodologies for risk-based adaptation planning and integrating climate risk into socioeconomic planning. The objective is to produce risk-based approach guidelines that can apply to other sectors. Risk-based adaptation planning enables governments to incorporate climate resilience into development goals by addressing potential climate impacts or opportunities by sector. The document outlines ACCC II's risk-based adaptation planning roadmap and importance of linking adaptation plans to other relevant policy areas like emergency response and land use.
Lecture-3 The Challenges of Environmental polluion and Enforcement of lawsShankor Paul
The document summarizes environmental pollution and enforcement of environmental laws in Bangladesh. It discusses major challenges like water, air, and soil pollution from industrial waste, vehicles, and agriculture. Enforcement is challenging due to lack of awareness, reluctance of authorities, and inadequate resources. The Environment Court Act established environment courts, appeal courts, and special magistrate courts to try environmental cases. However, the system remains dependent on executives and has limited appeal options.
1. The document discusses the importance of oceans in providing climate information and the need to expand global ocean observing systems to improve understanding of climate change.
2. It highlights U.S. efforts to support developing an integrated global observing system, including commitments to assist other countries and fund ocean monitoring technologies like ARGO buoys.
3. The author argues that a comprehensive, sustained global observing system is necessary to generate reliable climate data and forecasts that can inform science-based policies around the world.
Global Disposal Inc. aims to increase universal waste collection rates to decrease toxic materials in landfills. A survey found that 32-33% of respondents improperly dispose of batteries, phones, and lightbulbs. If Global Disposal's 4,829 accounts each provide 10 pounds of universal waste, it could divert 4% of the 1,219,156 pounds otherwise landfilled. While the initial diversion is small, improved education can encourage more participation, further reducing environmental contamination from mercury and lead.
This document describes a study that developed indicators to identify potential priorities for reducing exposure to air pollutants in Canada. The indicators are based on emissions data from industrial facilities, transportation, and residential heating for 21 known and suspected carcinogens. The indicators, including total annual emissions and toxic equivalent emissions, are calculated for different regions of Canada to help identify pollutants and sources that may warrant further investigation and exposure reduction efforts. The regional analysis suggests that residents of Quebec and New Brunswick may face higher risks from industrial emissions, and that residential wood burning could be an important source to control, especially in northern and eastern Canada.
Adaptation options, needs, opportunities and associated costs: An African Con...ipcc-media
1) The document summarizes key findings from the IPCC's 5th Assessment Report regarding adaptation to climate change in Africa. It outlines increasing vulnerabilities, needs, and options for adaptation across sectors like water, agriculture, ecosystems, and health.
2) It notes that while awareness of climate risks and options is growing, translation to action remains a challenge. Mainstreaming adaptation into development is important to build synergies.
3) Costs of adaptation are estimated to reach billions annually by 2030, far more than current funding, indicating a large adaptation deficit. Successful implementation requires addressing institutional, financial, and knowledge barriers.
Sixth Assessment Report Cycle; Special Reports with Focus on Climate Change a...ipcc-media
The document outlines the Sixth Assessment Cycle of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It discusses the two upcoming special reports focusing on climate change and land, as well as ways to get involved in the IPCC process. The special reports will examine global warming of 1.5°C, the impacts on oceans and cryosphere, and the interactions between climate change and land. The Sixth Assessment Cycle will also include updated methodology guidelines and the three working group reports being released in 2021 and 2022.
MY SALES PEOPLE WON'T USE MY CRM! WHAT YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT.SalesScripter
Join Sales Growth Hub co-founder, Craig Klein, for a presentation on why sales people resist using CRMs, why CRM success is crucial to your business’ future and how to build a CRM your sales people love and your business can thrive with.
Enhancing the Human Phenotype Ontology for Use by the LaypersonErin D. Foster
The document describes efforts to enhance the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) by adding layperson synonyms to make it more useful and accessible for patients. The workflow involved systematically reviewing over 12,000 HPO classes, searching external sources to find additional lay synonyms, classifying the synonyms, incorporating the new synonyms into the HPO ontology file, and performing quality assurance checks. As a result of this work, 44% of synonyms in HPO are now classified as layperson terms, increasing its utility for applications involving patients.
Setting 4.5 billion years of Natural History Data freeMargaret Gold
My Lightning Talk at Over the Air 2016 - about the digital collections programme at the Natural History Museum London, the Natural History Open Data Challenge on the hackathon, and some calls-to-action!
The presentation describes the applications developed within the Via Regina project. The applications collect and display VGI (Volunteered Geographic Information) to rediscover and promote the cultural heritage of the region between Italy and Switzerland called "Via Regina". The presentation was presented at the COST ENERGIC meeting in Siena.
Bridging discrepancies across North American butterfly naming authorities: Su...Anne Thessen
Citizen science monitoring programs have collected data on presence, abundance and distribution of butterfly species (Papilionoidea and Hesperoidea) across North America on a regular basis; some for up to forty years. These observations are fundamental for analyzing trends in butterfly populations over time and space in response to environmental changes, and are all the more valuable because butterflies, with differing requirements for larval and adult stages, are particularly good bioindicators of ecosystem disturbance. In the last 15 years, citizen scientist enthusiasm to participate in butterfly monitoring has sparked a tremendous expansion of new survey projects that would otherwise not be feasible. The North American Butterfly Monitoring Network (http://www.thebutterflynetwork.org/) tracks 30+ independent programs ranging in scope from local to continental, all which recruit local citizen scientists to collect field observations. No global naming authority yet exists for butterflies, so the programs operate using a taxon list of their own choosing, which may or may not derive from a published, authoritative list. To look at broad-scale patterns, data must be integrated across independent monitoring projects, but species and subspecies-level name conflicts significantly complicate integration of data among projects, and in some cases integration is impossible. To resolve as many issues as possible, we developed a data structure to act as a bridge in interpreting nomenclatural discrepancies. We aligned a cumulative total of 3201 species names and 3282 subspecies names from the three most recently published North American butterfly taxonomic checklists: NABA 2nd edition (2001), Opler and Warren (2003), and Pelham (2014) and North American species from the global Integrated Taxonomic Information Service (ITIS) to characterize and resolve all discrepancies. Pair-wise agreement between these base lists ranged from 78% to 95%. We worked with 10 programs to identify which of these base taxonomies their list most closely resembled and to record any name deviations from that base. The project taxon lists ranged in size from 80 to 244 taxa. None of the lists matched a base list exactly; the highest number of deviations between a project list and its base list was 22. Most deviations were due to generic-level disagreements. Our alignment unambiguously relates any name from any participating survey group to the equivalently defined taxonomic entity on any other participating group’s list. Defining comparable relationships between authorities allows essential cross-talk among the multitude of established and newly developing research agendas monitoring the dynamic occurrences of North American butterflies.
EPA’s scientists and engineers are pushing the scientific frontiers in low-cost and portable air sensor monitoring that is engaging communities to learn about their air quality. At the same time, they are inspiring young people to learn what science can do to protect the air we breathe. See what they have accomplished over the last five years (2012-2016).
The document summarizes environmental research and development funding by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for fiscal year 2013. It provides details on funding amounts and percentages for various EPA offices and programs, including the Office of Research and Development and its research programs in areas such as air/climate/energy, chemical safety, human health risk assessment, homeland security, and water resources. It describes the goals and objectives of research conducted by each program. Overall funding for EPA R&D in FY2013 is estimated at $550 million, a slight decrease from FY2012.
2014 Dept of Energy Environmental R&D ReportLyle Birkey
This document summarizes federal funding for environmental research and development by the U.S. Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014. It finds that DOE spent $2.329 billion on environmental R&D, an 8.6% increase over 2013. Most funding (79%) went to Energy Resources R&D, focusing on energy efficiency, fossil fuels, and renewable energy. The Office of Science received $456 million for climate science, biological sciences, and basic energy sciences. Environmental Management R&D received $10 million for cleanup activities. Key areas funded include energy efficiency in buildings, vehicles, and manufacturing; fossil fuel research in coal, natural gas and petroleum; and renewable research in bioenergy, geothermal,
Fy 2014 army corps environmental rd report october 21 2014 kdLyle Birkey
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers supports environmental research and development activities through its Engineer Research and Development Center. The Center focuses on areas like warfighter support, installations, environment, water resources, and information technology. It conducts research on ecosystem science, environmental resiliency, and issues like climate change through laboratories specializing in areas like the environment, coastal and hydraulic engineering, and cold regions. The Corps works to strengthen national security while protecting the environment and has a mission of delivering engineering services and reducing disaster risks.
FY 2013 R&D REPORT January 6 2014 - PreambleLyle Birkey
Federal funding for environmental research and development in the US totaled over $9 billion in 2013 according to this report. The report provides an overview of environmental R&D funding across multiple federal agencies, with the largest amounts going to the Department of Energy ($2.5 billion), National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($1.5 billion), National Science Foundation ($600 million), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ($400 million). It also summarizes programs within each agency that receive environmental R&D funding and the areas of focus for that research.
NCSE Federal Funding for Environmental Research and Development 2013 - Append...Lyle Birkey
The document provides an overview of federal funding for environmental research and development in fiscal year 2013. It summarizes funding levels for various federal agencies that conduct environmental research, including the Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Agriculture, Department of the Interior, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Defense, and National Institutes of Health. The document was developed by the National Council for Science and the Environment to analyze trends in environmental research funding across agencies over time.
2014 NSF Environmental R&D Report October 2014Lyle Birkey
The document discusses federal funding for environmental research and development by the National Science Foundation (NSF) in 2014. It provides an overview of NSF funding for environmental research across its Biological Sciences, Engineering, and Geosciences directorates, totaling $1.729 billion. Specifically, it details funding amounts and programs within the Biological Sciences divisions of Environmental Biology ($139M), Integrative Organismal Systems ($216M), and Biological Infrastructure ($90M).
Global foundations for reducing nutrient enrichment and oxygen depletion from...Iwl Pcu
This document outlines a project aimed at establishing global foundations for reducing nutrient pollution from land into coastal waters. The project will:
1) Develop quantitative models to map nutrient sources and their effects on coastal areas.
2) Create a "policy toolbox" with tools and approaches for developing nutrient reduction strategies.
3) Conduct pilot projects in Manila Bay and Chilka Lake to develop stakeholder-led nutrient reduction strategies.
4) Establish a global partnership on nutrient management to stimulate replication of outcomes.
FY 2013 R&D REPORT January 6 2014 - National Institute of HealthLyle Birkey
The National Institutes of Health allocates $75 million to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) for environmental research and development in 2012. NIEHS' mission is to study how the environment affects human health to promote healthier lives. It focuses on diseases with strong environmental links and conducts long-term, high-risk research through various programs studying topics like biostatistics, epidemiology, toxicology and neurobiology. NIEHS supports numerous extramural programs on issues like autism, bisphenol A, breast cancer and the environment, and Superfund sites.
IAIA Climate Change Special Symposium reportBiva Chapagain
The two-day symposium hosted by the World Bank and IAIA in Washington D.C. brought together 180 climate change and impact assessment professionals. The purpose was to foster collaboration between the two communities and discuss how development institutions are incorporating impact assessment into their climate change strategies. Key themes that emerged included: 1) the need to integrate climate change with other environmental issues; and 2) the pressure on impact assessment to integrate climate change assessment into its processes to better understand project impacts on GHG emissions and the environment's impacts on projects. Strategic environmental assessment was highlighted as having an important role in climate change adaptation and mitigation when bringing together environmental and social issues before project-level assessments.
Chemicals and waste play important roles in society and the economy but can also harm human health and the environment if not properly managed. A third of the world's food is wasted every year, totaling about 1.3 billion tons. The United Nations aims to minimize the adverse effects of chemicals on human health and the environment by 2020. To achieve this, UNEP is working with partners to build countries' capacity and policies for sound chemicals and waste management through increasing scientific knowledge and tools.
Al zarqa river pollution causes, actions and revival ………rectangular of pollutionShomou' Aljizawi
Environment Impact Assessment for Al Zarqa River in Jordan, Rectangular Of Pollution , done by Eng Shomou + Eng Noor and supervised by Dr. Nasser Abu Anzeeh
January 8th esp 179 lecture- class intro and eia basicsCEQAplanner
This document provides information about the ESP 179 - Winter 2013 Environmental Impact Assessment course at UC Davis. The instructor is Trevor Macenski and the teaching assistant is Kevin Fang. The class has a capacity of 85 students and those on the waitlist should speak to the instructor after class. Contact information is provided for the student affairs officer. Brief biographies of the instructor and TA are included. The course objectives are outlined as well as an overview of how the class will be structured and graded. Reading assignments and an introduction to environmental impact assessment are discussed.
Environmental HealthTheme Outdoor Air QualityDescription TanaMaeskm
Environmental Health
Theme: Outdoor Air Quality
Description of the Environmental Health Theme
The environmental theme I choose from the Pilsen windshield survey outdoor air quality. It was resolved that the Pilsen community has had the problem of good quality outdoor air for over ten years. A smelting facility in the neighborhood has been associated with the degrading condition of air safety in the area. The goal of Healthy People 2020 is to create a healthy environment to promote people’s health (HealthyPeople.gov., 2021). Outdoor air quality is the first objective of Healthy People 2020 that focuses on reducing air pollution to reduce the increasing premature deaths associated with poor air quality such as cancer and cardiovascular and respiratory illnesses (HealthyPeople.gov., 2021).
Impact of Outdoor Air Pollution on Pilsen Community
According to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Illinois EPA), air emissions increase the lead concentration in the air. Lead is associated with various health effects when it accumulates in the body. After ingestion, lead enters into the bloodstream and gets distributed to other body parts and increases the risk of brain damage, and may impair prenatal development (Pilsen Environmental Rights and Reform Organization (PERRO), 2021). It can cause lead poisoning when people ingest contaminated substances such as water, soil, and dust. The Illinois Department of Public Health encourages children to be assessed to determine their exposure to lead, particularly those aged between 6 months and 6 years (Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Illinois EPA), 2021). Illinois EPA identified that lead exposure was a community concern due to the proximity of the sources of emissions to schools and residents (Illinois EPA, 2021).
The Historical, Present, and Future Perspectives on Air Pollution in Pilsen
The issue of air pollution in the Pilsen community has been a target for EPA for over 10 years. Community inquiries raised in 2005 about the air emissions from a smelting company known as H. Kramer and Co. attracted the attention of EPA. EPA found that the facility had violated air pollution regulations. In 2013, the Illinois State and EPA started parametric monitoring to monitor lead emissions and ensure the emissions did not exceed the set limits and also prevent leakage. Reports indicate that there has been a reduction in lead concentrations in the air, particularly due to the measures that have been put in place to control emissions. Although significant efforts have been taken to control air pollution in Pilsen, unfiltered emissions still remain a major concern. It appears that the regulatory agencies have struggled to control air pollution from big industries such as H. Kramer and the Fisk and Crawford coal-fired plant. The U.S. EPA stated that there were excessive emissions from the facilities (Guzzardl, 2011). However, the facilities were only asked to set up plans ...
UNDP final report + case reports carbon foot printingGraeme Esau
This document summarizes the objectives and key findings of a study measuring the carbon footprint of UNDP-administered Global Fund grants for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria programs in Zimbabwe. The study aimed to apply the carbon footprint methodology developed in an earlier study at a larger scale in Africa. It found that the methodology could be applied to measure emissions from the new grants and inform program development. It also identified five priority areas - including waste management, product carbon factors, and fleet vehicles - for further action to reduce emissions in health programs.
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY NASA Lyle Birkey
T he National Council for Science and the Environment (NCSE) is pleased to acknowledge and express its deep appreciation to the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). The AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program has provided the budget
analysis behind this report for the past fourteen years, first under Kei Koizumi and, in recent years, under Patrick Clemins and now Matthew Hourihan.
Similar to FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 2014 (20)
This document discusses implementing environmental research and education over the next decade. It emphasizes the need to improve understanding of complex socio-environmental systems through integrated research across disciplines like the natural sciences, social sciences, and engineering. Specifically, it calls for sustaining programs that study these complex systems through experiments, observations, and modeling. It also discusses the importance of sharing knowledge with society through education and communication. Overall the document provides a framework to guide environmental research and education investments at the National Science Foundation over the next 10 years.
Learning Standards for Environment and Sustainability: Expressing leadership ...Lyle Birkey
The document discusses learning standards developed for environment and sustainability programs in Australia. It describes the process used to develop the standards which involved collaboration between 50 higher education institutions and over 250 stakeholders. The standards focus on four domains: technical and disciplinary knowledge, systemic understanding of human-environment interactions, skills for sustainability work, and ethical practice. The standards aim to provide minimum expectations while allowing flexibility for the diverse and transdisciplinary nature of environment and sustainability fields.
This document discusses challenges and strategies for integrating knowledge in interdisciplinary environmental and sustainability teams. It describes how conceptual distance between disciplines can hamper collaboration. Learning is key to connecting different bodies of knowledge, and theories like experiential learning, double-loop learning, and model-based reasoning can help explain learning processes for individuals and groups. Productive team practices include using boundary negotiating objects like visual models to facilitate knowledge sharing and the development of shared conceptual frameworks.
Preparing Students for Collaborative Leadership: Lowering the walls and cross...Lyle Birkey
Preparing Students for Collaborative Leadership: Lowering the walls and crossing boundaries using business-based professional assessments to develop interdisciplinary teams
The document discusses how top-down and bottom-up approaches to sustainability initiatives in universities can meet in the middle. It advocates for leadership from administrators and academics, infrastructure support from facilities, and sustainability champions across different levels. The key to success is institutionalizing sustainability efforts throughout the university through collaboration between various stakeholders rather than relying on individuals.
This document summarizes a study that analyzed the perspectives of 354 leaders of interdisciplinary environmental and sustainability degree programs. The leaders were surveyed about factors influencing their program's success. An exploratory factor analysis identified 9 key areas of influence, which a cluster analysis grouped into 3 views held by program leaders. View 1 leaders emphasized curriculum design, View 2 added an applied learning focus, and View 3 further emphasized external partnerships. The views differed in what factors were most important to success and leaders' program attributes. Challenges varied but included institutional support for all views and external engagement for View 3 programs.
This document summarizes a webinar presentation by Dr. Magdalena Muir on the UN's Sustainable Development Goals. The webinar covered the UN process of establishing the SDGs, the outcome document outlining 17 proposed goals, and several case studies providing examples and visions for implementing the goals. It discussed the European Commission's vision for the SDGs, emphasizing universality, sustainability, and accountability. It also briefly discussed approaches for financing SDG implementation through public-private partnerships.
This document outlines the program for the 2015 CCCAP Winter Conference focused on sustainable bridges to collaboration and partnerships. The conference will take place over two days and include sessions on CCAP strategic initiatives and goals, environmental education and research priorities, institutional self-assessment, overcoming obstacles to sustainability initiatives, and developing partnerships and resource sharing. Keynote speakers will discuss topics like time banking and the food-energy-agriculture nexus. Workshops aim to help member institutions identify challenges, best practices, and strategies for collaboration and leveraging resources. The program concludes with planning next steps for CCAP and the 2016 NCSE conference.
The document provides the program schedule for the 2015 CEDD Winter Conference held over two days. Day 1 includes a CEDD Executive Committee meeting and lunch, followed by an overview and discussion of CEDD initiatives and priorities. In the afternoon there are two workshops on "Mapping" and environmental education research and services. Day 2 begins with CEDD committee meetings followed by three workshops on funding creative approaches, sustainability certification, and interdisciplinary scholarship. The day concludes with discussion on future priorities and the 2015 summer conference.
The document outlines plans for a transportation campaign in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil leading up to the 2016 Olympics. The campaign aims to improve public transportation infrastructure and transparency around projects to ensure success for the Olympics. Key goals include having a functioning public transit system and growing tourism by 2016. Currently there is skepticism that projects will be completed on time. The campaign would address this through improved government communication, transparency around budgets, timelines and stakeholder involvement. The target audience is residents in Rio suburbs who could benefit from improved transportation. Strategies include educational media using celebrities, community meetings, and collecting public feedback to influence government policies and complete projects on schedule.
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE THE SMITHSONIAN INS...Lyle Birkey
The Smithsonian Institution receives federal funding for environmental research and development through four main programs: 1) The Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute ($12 million), which conducts biodiversity research in Panama. 2) The Smithsonian Environmental Research Center ($4 million), which performs Chesapeake Bay ecosystem research. 3) The Smithsonian National Zoological Park ($2 million), including conservation research at its Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute. 4) The National Museum of Natural History ($18 million), housing environmental research departments and facilities.
FY 2013 R&D REPORT January 6 2014 - US Global Change Research ProgramLyle Birkey
The U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) coordinates federal research on changes to the global environment and their implications. Thirteen government agencies participate in USGCRP, which began in 1989 and aims to advance scientific understanding of climate change and inform policymaking. USGCRP's budget was $2.428 billion in FY2011 and $2.685 billion in FY2013, with the largest shares going to NASA, NOAA, and DOE. The program seeks to strengthen climate research, assessment, and communication to support timely decision-making.
FY 2013 R&D REPORT January 6 2014 - National Science FoundationLyle Birkey
The document summarizes federal funding for environmental research and development from the National Science Foundation (NSF) in fiscal year 2013. It provides details on funding amounts for various departments within NSF that support environmental research, including the Biological Sciences, Environmental Biology, Integrative Organismal Systems, Engineering, Geosciences, and Biological Infrastructure. The NSF is the primary source of federal funding for basic environmental research at US universities, providing $1.6 billion for these purposes in FY2013 across various science disciplines.
Improving the viability of probiotics by encapsulation methods for developmen...Open Access Research Paper
The popularity of functional foods among scientists and common people has been increasing day by day. Awareness and modernization make the consumer think better regarding food and nutrition. Now a day’s individual knows very well about the relation between food consumption and disease prevalence. Humans have a diversity of microbes in the gut that together form the gut microflora. Probiotics are the health-promoting live microbial cells improve host health through gut and brain connection and fighting against harmful bacteria. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are the two bacterial genera which are considered to be probiotic. These good bacteria are facing challenges of viability. There are so many factors such as sensitivity to heat, pH, acidity, osmotic effect, mechanical shear, chemical components, freezing and storage time as well which affects the viability of probiotics in the dairy food matrix as well as in the gut. Multiple efforts have been done in the past and ongoing in present for these beneficial microbial population stability until their destination in the gut. One of a useful technique known as microencapsulation makes the probiotic effective in the diversified conditions and maintain these microbe’s community to the optimum level for achieving targeted benefits. Dairy products are found to be an ideal vehicle for probiotic incorporation. It has been seen that the encapsulated microbial cells show higher viability than the free cells in different processing and storage conditions as well as against bile salts in the gut. They make the food functional when incorporated, without affecting the product sensory characteristics.
Evolving Lifecycles with High Resolution Site Characterization (HRSC) and 3-D...Joshua Orris
The incorporation of a 3DCSM and completion of HRSC provided a tool for enhanced, data-driven, decisions to support a change in remediation closure strategies. Currently, an approved pilot study has been obtained to shut-down the remediation systems (ISCO, P&T) and conduct a hydraulic study under non-pumping conditions. A separate micro-biological bench scale treatability study was competed that yielded positive results for an emerging innovative technology. As a result, a field pilot study has commenced with results expected in nine-twelve months. With the results of the hydraulic study, field pilot studies and an updated risk assessment leading site monitoring optimization cost lifecycle savings upwards of $15MM towards an alternatively evolved best available technology remediation closure strategy.
Kinetic studies on malachite green dye adsorption from aqueous solutions by A...Open Access Research Paper
Water polluted by dyestuffs compounds is a global threat to health and the environment; accordingly, we prepared a green novel sorbent chemical and Physical system from an algae, chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle and impregnated with algae with chitosan nanocomposite for the sorption of Malachite green dye from water. The algae with chitosan nanocomposite by a simple method and used as a recyclable and effective adsorbent for the removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solutions. Algae, chitosan, chitosan nanoparticle and algae with chitosan nanocomposite were characterized using different physicochemical methods. The functional groups and chemical compounds found in algae, chitosan, chitosan algae, chitosan nanoparticle, and chitosan nanoparticle with algae were identified using FTIR, SEM, and TGADTA/DTG techniques. The optimal adsorption conditions, different dosages, pH and Temperature the amount of algae with chitosan nanocomposite were determined. At optimized conditions and the batch equilibrium studies more than 99% of the dye was removed. The adsorption process data matched well kinetics showed that the reaction order for dye varied with pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order. Furthermore, the maximum adsorption capacity of the algae with chitosan nanocomposite toward malachite green dye reached as high as 15.5mg/g, respectively. Finally, multiple times reusing of algae with chitosan nanocomposite and removing dye from a real wastewater has made it a promising and attractive option for further practical applications.
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...Joshua Orris
Results of geophysics and pneumatic injection pilot tests during 2003 – 2007 yielded significant positive results for injection delivery design and contaminant mass treatment, resulting in permanent shut-down of an existing groundwater Pump & Treat system.
Accessible source areas were subsequently removed (2011) by soil excavation and treated with the placement of Emulsified Vegetable Oil EVO and zero-valent iron ZVI to accelerate treatment of impacted groundwater in overburden and weathered fractured bedrock. Post pilot test and post remediation groundwater monitoring has included analyses of CVOCs, organic fatty acids, dissolved gases and QuantArray® -Chlor to quantify key microorganisms (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, etc.) and functional genes (e.g., vinyl chloride reductase, methane monooxygenase, etc.) to assess potential for reductive dechlorination and aerobic cometabolism of CVOCs.
In 2022, the first commercial application of MetaArray™ was performed at the site. MetaArray™ utilizes statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and multivariate analysis to provide evidence that reductive dechlorination is active or even that it is slowing. This creates actionable data allowing users to save money by making important site management decisions earlier.
The results of the MetaArray™ analysis’ support vector machine (SVM) identified groundwater monitoring wells with a 80% confidence that were characterized as either Limited for Reductive Decholorination or had a High Reductive Reduction Dechlorination potential. The results of MetaArray™ will be used to further optimize the site’s post remediation monitoring program for monitored natural attenuation.
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 2014
1. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014
1
FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 2014
Prepared by Peter Saundry, Ph.D. for the COUNCIL OF ENVIRONMENTAL DEANS AND DIRECTORS,
AND THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE AFFILIATE PROGRAM OCTOBER 2014
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT
3. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014
3
Contents
Foreword ............................................................................................. 4
Summary ............................................................................................. 5
1. Air, Climate, and Energy ($95 million) ............................................. 7
2. Chemical Safety for Sustainability ($131 million) ............................. 9
3. Homeland Security ($38 million) .................................................... 11
4. Safe & Sustainable Water Resources ($111 million) ...................... 12
5. Sustainable & Healthy Communities ($155 million) ........................ 14
6. Superfund ($19 million) .................................................................. 16
4. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014
4
T
Foreword
he National Council for Science and the Environment (NCSE) is pleased to acknowledge and express its deep appreciation to the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). The AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program has provided the budget analysis behind this report for the past fifteen years, first under Kei Koizumi and, in recent years, under Patrick Clemins and now Matthew Hourihan.
AAAS drew the data for this report from White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) R&D data, Budget of the United States Government and from agency and historical data. Yearly values are adjusted for inflation using OMB's GDP deflators. Nominal values are unadjusted. FY 2013 are estimates adjusted for the full-year continuing resolution and sequestration. The text of this report is largely drawn directly from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) budget justification to Congress,1 from EPA agency web sites, and to a lesser degree, from other EPA resources.
The definition of Environmental R&D used in this report includes environmental physical, life, and social sciences; environmental engineering; energy-related fields; environmental data and information; and studies that utilize any or all of the above to address pollution problems or activities that impair the sustained functioning and productivity of the earth’s environment.
We have made no effort to analyze activities by specific “fields of science” or “scientific disciplines.”
Because terms such as “environmental science” and even “research” and “development” have imprecise definitions, estimates of federal funding for environmental R&D must be considered approximations. That is not to say the data and descriptions of particular programs are not accurate, rather that definitions are important in deciding which programs and projects to include in the analysis. We have attempted to maintain consistency over the past fourteen years in order to identify trends.
The budget of the federal government and the activities of its agencies are subject to change — sometimes significant change at short notice. We again encourage readers to explore the websites and documents of the respective agencies and programs for the latest information.
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FY 2015 Budget - http://www2.epa.gov/planandbudget/fy2015
5. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014
FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014 5
T
Summary
he Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)2 administers over a dozen major environmental laws, including the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Solid Waste Disposal Act and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Superfund, Toxic Substances Control Act, and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. Implementation of these laws provides EPA with an overarching mission to protect human health and safeguard the natural environment.
The Office of Research and Development (ORD) is the principal scientific and research arm of the EPA. ORD’s Strategic Plan describes its approach to fulfilling a mission to conduct leading-edge research and foster the sound use of science and technology to fulfill EPA’s mission to protect human health and safeguard the natural environment. This mission commits ORD to conduct its research in a way that will have a direct and meaningful impact on EPA’s decisions and programs.
Figure 1. Environmental R&D at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (budget authority in millions of dollars)
The Office of Research and Development has six major research areas which are reflected in Table 1 and in the narrative budget. EPA also conducts R&D in support of the responsibilities for the Superfund program to clean up the nation’s uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. Finally, EPA has a modest oil spill research program. These programs map onto five agency goals:
2. Environmental Protection Agency website - http://www.epa.gov/
6. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014 6
1. Addressing Climate Change and Improving Air Quality
2. Protecting America's Waters
3. Cleaning Up Communities and Advancing Sustainable Development
4. Ensuring the Safety of Chemicals and Preventing Pollution
5. Protecting Human Health and the Environment by Enforcing Laws and Assuring Compliance
Approximately three quarters of EPA’s R&D is implemented intramurally or through federally funded research and development centers. ORD’s laboratories, centers and offices are:
National Center for Computational Toxicology (NCCT)
National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA)
National Center for Environmental Research (NCER)
National Exposure Research Laboratory (NERL)
National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (NHEERL)
National Homeland Security Research Center (NHSRC)
National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL)
Office of the Science Advisor (OSA)
Office of Science Policy (OSP)
The remaining quarter of EPA’s R&D is conducted by extramural partners.
Table 1. Environmental R&D at the Environmental Protection Agency (budget authority in millions of dollars)
EPA R&D by Account:
FY 2012 Actual
FY 2013 Actual
FY 2014 Estimate
Change FY 12-13 Percent
Science and Technology1
572
510
534
4.8% Air, Climate, and Energy 104 87 95 9.0%
Chemical Safety and Sustainability
136
123
131
6.3% Homeland Security 39 39 38 -1.4%
Safe & Sustainable Water Resources
114
106
111
4.5% Sustainable & Healthy Communities 174 155 155 0.2%
Congressional Projects (All Goals)
5
0
4
- - Superfund 23 22 19 -11.4%
Oil Spill Response
1
1
1
16.7% ____ ____ ____
TOTAL
596
533
555
4.1%
1 Excludes transfers from Superfund (see Superfund line).
7. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014 7
1. Air, Climate, and Energy ($95 million)
Air, Climate, and Energy (ACE) research3 supports EPA’s programs mandated by the Clean Air Act (CAA). Research examines the interplay between air pollution, climate change, and the dynamic energy sector to develop innovative and sustainable solutions for improving air quality and taking action on climate change. Three research themes provide a framework for ACE:
1. Assess Impacts: Assess human and ecosystem exposures and effects associated with air pollutants and climate change at individual, community, regional, and global scales.
2. Prevent and Reduce Emissions: Provide data and tools to develop and evaluate approaches to prevent and reduce emissions of pollutants to the atmosphere, particularly environmentally sustainable, cost-effective, and innovative multi-pollutant and sector-based approaches.
3. Respond to Changes in Climate and Air Quality: Provide human exposure and environmental modeling, monitoring, metrics, and information needed by individuals, communities, and governmental agencies to adapt to the impacts of climate change and make public health decisions regarding air quality.
ACE research programs are:
1.1 Air Quality, which includes:
a. Indoor air quality, including mold problems and the balance between energy-saving measures and indoor air quality.
b. Impacts of current and emerging energy options on air quality, with particular emphasis on biomass.
c. Impact of climate change on ground-level air pollutants.
d. Solutions for existing or emerging halogenated solvents used in industry.
e. Health and Air Quality, for which role of common air pollutants in the development and exacerbation of asthma at different life stages is of particular interest.
f. Ecosystems and Air Quality, which includes research to address the ecological impacts of air pollutants and to support the secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
1.2 Air Pollution Research, which includes:
a. Impacts of multiple pollutants together.
b. Toxins emitted from highway vehicles and non-road equipment.
c. Emissions from transportation sources.
d. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks.
e. Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program for emissions from individual facilities.
3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Air, Climate, and Energy Strategic Research Action Plan 2012-2016 - http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-06/documents/strap-ace2012.pdf
8. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014 8
1.3 Air Tools and Technology, which includes:
a. Models, databases, and tools for air quality.
b. Greenhouse gases and other air pollutants from freight transport, including the SmartWay Technology Program.
c. Atmospheric modeling and analysis research to assess changes in air quality and air pollutant exposures as affected by changes in ecosystem management and regulatory decisions.
1.4 Emerging technologies, such as satellites and sensor technologies, which could be used to enhance air quality monitoring and measurement.
1.5 Climate Change Research, which occurs in:
a. Climate change and air quality.
b. Health and climate change.
c. Climate change research methods, models, tools, and databases.
d. Climate adaptation and mitigation.
e. Ecosystems and climate change.
f. Energy and climate change.
g. Extreme events grants.
h. Global change grants.
9. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014 9
2. Chemical Safety for Sustainability ($131 million)
The Chemical Safety for Sustainability (CSS)4 research program advances EPA’s priority “Assuring the Safety of Chemicals” (EPA, 2010). The CSS research program uses novel research approaches to address the risks posed by chemicals in industrial and commercial use, as well as risks posed by these chemicals as they degrade or pass through the environment. There are three research goals:
1. Developing the scientific knowledge, tools, and models needed to conduct integrated, timely, and efficient chemical evaluation strategies.
2. Improving methods for assessment and informing management for chemical safety and sustainability.
3. Providing targeted high-priority research solutions for immediate and focused attention.
CSS includes research in:
2.1 Chemical Exposure and Cumulative Risk, which includes:
a. Computational Toxicology (CompTox), which conducts research that integrates molecular biology, chemistry, and computer science to identify important biological processes that may be disrupted by chemicals and trace those biological disruptions to related dose and human exposure to chemicals. EPA’s National Center for Computational Technology is the largest component of EPA’s Computational Toxicology Research Program.
b. Chemical exposure and health effects.
c. Chemical life cycle.
d. Chemical exposure and ecological effects.
e. Perfluorinated chemicals.
f. Pharmaceuticals.
g. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PBCs; also 2.4).
2.2 Nanomaterials/Nanotechnology, which focuses on the most prevalent nanomaterials that have implications for human and environmental health. This research is presently focused on developing a scientific foundation to better understand, predict, and manage the challenges of engineered nanomaterials.
a. Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs; also 5.3), which focuses on:
b. Human health, such as early-life exposure to EDCs and lifetime health; effects on reproductive system development; effects on neurological development; and non-monotonic dose response curves research.
c. Testing and prioritizing chemicals for endocrine disruption.
d. Ecosystems and environment research, which studies EDCs in wastewater, surface water, groundwater, drinking water, air, and soil. EPA is studying the ecological effects that could
4 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chemical Safety for Sustainability Strategic Research Action Plan 2012-
2016 - http://epa.gov/research/docs/css-strap.pdf
10. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014 10
result from exposure to one or more of these substances and investigating ways to manage risks.
EPA has extramural funding and collaboration opportunities in this area.
2.3 Human Health, for which research focuses on the important biological processes involved with adverse outcomes and on improving methods that will better assess the impacts of chemical exposure to human health. Research focuses on populations of greatest protection, including children. This includes:
a. Human health risk assessment, by which estimates of the nature and probability of adverse health effects in humans who may be exposed to chemicals in contaminated environmental media are developed (also 5.4).
b. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in schools.
c. Stochastic Human Exposure and Dose Simulation (SHEDS) Model, which estimates the range of total chemical exposures in a population from different exposure pathways (e.g., inhalation, skin contact, dietary and non-dietary ingestion) over different time periods, given a set of demographic characteristics.
d. Virtual Embryo Research Project, which conducts studies to develop prediction techniques to improve understanding of how environmental influences may impact unborn children.
2.4 Pesticides, for which research supports EPA’s responsibility to register or license pesticides for use in the United States under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Research is conducted under the ToxCast Research Program,5 developed by the National Center for Computational Toxicology (NCCT), to develop cost-effective, innovative approaches to rapidly screen and prioritize many chemicals for further toxicological testing.
5. ToxCast Program - http://www.epa.gov/ncct/toxcast
11. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014 11
3. Homeland Security ($38 million)
Following the terrorist events of September 11, 2001 and the mailing of anthrax contaminated letters later that year, EPA's mission broadened to include protecting human health and the environment from the effects of biological, chemical, and radiological contamination (CBR) due to homeland security events. EPA produced the Strategic Plan for Homeland Security6 in order to identify the specific actions needed to handle its expanded mission to prevent, prepare for, and recover from terrorist threats and incidents.
Research is conducted in four areas:
1. Clean Air and Global Climate Change aims to minimize impacts to human health and the environment should unwanted releases of radiation occur.
2. Clean and Safe Water aims to protect human health by reducing exposure to contaminants in drinking water (including protecting source waters), in fish and shellfish, and in recreational waters. Research supports EPA’s strategy for ensuring safe drinking water and includes strengthening the security of water systems.
3. Land Preservation and Restoration aims to control risks to human health and the environment by mitigating the impact of accidental or intentional releases resulting in contaminated land and by cleaning up and restoring contaminated sites or properties to appropriate levels.
4. Healthy Communities and Ecosystems supports EPA efforts to identify, better understand, and prevent potential risks from accidental chemical releases. Research focuses on the best available scientific information, models, methods, and analyses to support Agency guidance and policy decisions related to the health of people, communities, and ecosystems.
Research highlighted includes:
Threat and consequence assessment research.
Water infrastructure protection research.
Decontamination and consequence management.
6. EPA Strategic Plan for Homeland Security - http://www.epa.gov/ohsporta/ohsportal/strategicplan.htm
12. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014 12
4. Safe & Sustainable Water Resources ($111 million)
EPA’s Safe and Sustainable Water Resources research program7 provides the science and innovative technologies that the Agency and nation need to maintain drinking water resources and systems as well as protect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation’s waters. It uses an integrated, systems approach to support the availability of the clean, adequate, and equitable water supplies necessary for human well-being and resilient aquatic ecosystems. Research is framed under two themes:
1. Sustainable Water Resources: Ensure safe and sustainable water quality and availability to protect human and ecosystem health by integrating social, economic, and environmental research for use in protecting and restoring water resources and their designated uses (e.g., drinking water, aquatic life, recreation, industrial processes, etc.) on a watershed scale.
2. Sustainable Water Infrastructure Systems: Ensure the sustainability of critical water resources using systems-integrated water resource management in which the natural, green, and built water infrastructure is capable of producing, storing and delivering safe and high- quality drinking water, as well as providing transport and use-specific treatment of wastewater and storm water.
Research is carried out in the seven following areas:
4.1 Water and Climate, which focuses on:
a. Modeling climate-related water resource stressors, such as nutrient pollution.
b. Analyzing biological indicators (e.g. microbial) and habitat indicators (e.g. hydrologic alteration) to determine the condition of watersheds.
c. Determining how climate change affects water quality, flow patterns, and flooding risk.
d. Understanding estuarine and coastal vulnerabilities to climate-related factors.
e. Designing predictive tools for improved land use management and water utility practices.
f. Developing adaptation strategies, including economic, social, and ecological approaches, to meet climate-related challenges.
4.2 Water and Energy, which focuses on safeguarding water resources from unintended impacts of energy and mineral exploration and energy efficient technologies that optimize resource recovery at drinking water and wastewater treatment facilities.
4.3 Protecting Watersheds, for which research is underway to:
a. Assess the condition of aquatic ecosystems.
b. Obtain a complete understanding of watershed processes.
c. Quantify the social, economic, and environmental costs of water quality degradation.
d. Establish new approaches to identify, assess, and prioritize contaminant risks.
e. Develop new approaches to minimize the impacts of these contaminants on water resources.
f. Consider the impacts of climate change, increased population, and changing human demographics on watersheds.
7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, , Safe and Sustainable Water Resources Strategic Research Action Plan 2012- 2016 - http://www2.epa.gov/epa-research/safe-and-sustainable-water-resources-strategic-research-action-plan-2012-2016
13. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014 13
4.4 Sustainable Water Infrastructure, for which research focuses on:
a. Developing predictive modeling tools for new infrastructure technologies.
b. Creating decision support tools that include economic and public health considerations while comparing water infrastructure approaches.
c. Exploring innovative techniques to increase water treatment efficiency.
d. Ensuring public health protection from distribution and storage system contaminants.
e. Determining innovating approaches to monitor and mitigate aging infrastructure.
f. Improving design, reliability, and understanding of green infrastructure effectiveness under region-specific conditions.
4.5 Chemical and Microbial Risk, for which research focuses on individual and group water contaminants in order to promote safe recreational waters, maintain healthy water resources and ecosystems, and prepare for potential terrorist threats to the nation’s water sources.
4.6 Managing Nutrients, for which research focuses on:
a. Studying the sources of nutrient pollution and harmful algal blooms.
b. Determining where nutrients go and how they move in the environment.
c. Evaluating the chemical changes that happen as nutrients move in the environment.
d. Studying the effects of nutrients on the environment and health.
e. Evaluating the benefits and costs associated with different nutrient management choices.
4.7 Health and Water, for which research focuses on:
a. Developing the methodologies and scientific information to support drinking water standards and other policies that protect people from waterborne illnesses.
b. Improving methods to measure human exposure to waterborne pathogens from source waters or drinking waters.
c. Prioritizing pathogen groups and information on the health risks of waterborne pathogens.
14. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014 14
5. Sustainable & Healthy Communities ($155 million)
The Sustainable and Healthy Communities (SHC) Research Program8 seeks to inform and empower decision makers in communities, as well as in federal, state and tribal community-driven programs, to effectively and equitably weigh and integrate human health, socio-economic, environmental, and ecological factors in their decisions in a way that fosters community sustainability. SHC is structured into four interrelated themes:
1. Data and Tools to Support Community Decisions
2. Forecasting and Assessing Ecological and Community Health
3. Implementing Near-Term Approaches to Sustainable Solutions
4. Integrated Solutions for Sustainable Outcomes
SHS research includes:
5.1 Ecosystem Research, which addresses:
a. Ecosystems services.
b. Protecting watersheds (also 4.3).
c. Water and climate (also 4.1).
d. Ecosystems and air quality (also 1.1f).
e. Managing nutrients (also 5.2d).
f. Ecological risk assessment.
5.2 Land and Waste Management, for which research addresses:
a. Management of contaminated sites.
b. Groundwater modeling.
c. Materials and waste management.
d. Nutrients management (also 5.1e).
5.3 Health Research, which includes:
a. Health Impact Assessments of public health impacts of projects, policies, and plans in communities.
b. The Durham Sustainability Pilot, which implements and evaluates community sustainability tools and approaches.
c. Asthma research (also 1.1e).
d. Regional Sustainable Environmental Sciences (RESES), which focuses on developing ecosystem goods and service-related data and tools that will be used to enable effective,
8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Sustainable and Healthy Communities Strategic Research Action Plan 2012 - 2016 - http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-06/documents/shc-strap.pdf
15. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014 15
efficient, and socially responsible solutions to commonly faced sustainability problems.
e. Environmental justice and health.
f. Children’s environmental health, including Children’s Centers.
g. Hormone disrupting chemicals (also 2.3).
h. Tribal environmental health research.
i. Environment, health, and society.
5.4 Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA; also 2.4a), which includes:
a. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) health hazard and dose-response assessments.
b. Integrated Science Assessments (ISAs) of criteria air pollutants.
c. Community Risk and Technical Support (CRTS) for exposure and health assessments.
d. Modernizing Risk Assessment Methods.
16. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014 16
6. Superfund ($19 million)
Superfund is the name given to the environmental program established to address abandoned hazardous waste sites. It is also the name of the fund established by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended. This law was enacted in the wake of the discovery of toxic waste dumps such as Love Canal and Times Beach in the 1970s. It allows the EPA to clean up such sites and to compel responsible parties to perform cleanups or reimburse the government for EPA-lead cleanups. The Superfund cleanup process is complex. It involves the steps taken to assess sites, place them on the National Priorities List, and establish and implement appropriate cleanup plans. The EPA budget for Superfund is approximately $1 billion, part of which is transferred for research.
The most significant research program on Superfund is undertaken through the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) within the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which funds university-based multidisciplinary research on human health and environmental issues related to hazardous substances. The central goal is to understand and break the link between chemical exposure and disease.
EPA, which receives a modest Superfund research budget, works with NIEHS. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) also provides critical health-based information to assist EPA in making effective cleanup decisions. The EPA works with these agencies on collaborative projects, information exchange, and identification of research issues and has a MOU with each agency.
17. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2014 17
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT