The Rescorla-Wagner model provides a mathematical framework for Pavlovian conditioning. It states that the change in associative strength (ΔVn) on each trial is proportional to the difference between the maximum possible strength (λ) and the current strength (Vn-1). This results in a negatively accelerated learning curve as the difference gets smaller with more training. During extinction, when the unconditioned stimulus is no longer presented, associative strength decreases on each trial as it becomes less and less surprising. The model can account for many classical and operant conditioning phenomena through simple associative learning rules.
This slide is made by Amit (facebook.com/titanium009) for his class presentation..Sorry fellows and fellas some fonts are not working and creating malfunction... :(...Check fonts from dafont.com and make an awesome slide.. Drop me a mail if you want the exact presentation file (titanium009@gmail.com)
This slide is made by Amit (facebook.com/titanium009) for his class presentation..Sorry fellows and fellas some fonts are not working and creating malfunction... :(...Check fonts from dafont.com and make an awesome slide.. Drop me a mail if you want the exact presentation file (titanium009@gmail.com)
This presentation will help you understand the concepts and principles used in Operant conditioning. This will also help you to understand the difference between classical and operant conditioning.
Classical conditioning is a type of learning that had a major influence on the school of thought in psychology known as behaviorism.Classical conditioning basically involves forming an association between two stimuli resulting in a learned response.
In reality, people do not respond exactly like
Pavlov's dogs. There are, however, numerous real-world applications for classical conditioning. For example, many dog trainers use classical conditioning techniques to help people train their pets.
These techniques are also useful in the treatment of phobias or anxiety problems. Teachers are able to apply classical conditioning in the class by creating a positive classroom environment to help students overcome anxiety or fear. Pairing an anxiety-provoking situation, such as performing in front of a group, with pleasant surroundings helps the student learn new associations
What is different about life? it is inherited oberwolfach march 7 1 2018Bob Eisenberg
What is different about life? Why do life sciences require different science and mathematics? I address these issues starting from the obvious: all of life is inherited from genes. Twenty thousand genes of say 30 atoms each control an animal of ~1e25 atoms. How is that possible? Answer: the structures of life form a hierarchy of devices that allow handfuls of atoms to control everything. A nerve signal involves meters of nerve but is controlled by a few atoms. Indeed, potassium and sodium differ only in the diameter of the atoms. Life depends on this difference in diameter. Sodium and potassium are otherwise identical. The task of the biological scientist is first to identify the hierarchy of devices and what they do. Then we want to know how the devices work. We want to understand life well enough to improve its devices, in disease and technology.
This presentation will help you understand the concepts and principles used in Operant conditioning. This will also help you to understand the difference between classical and operant conditioning.
Classical conditioning is a type of learning that had a major influence on the school of thought in psychology known as behaviorism.Classical conditioning basically involves forming an association between two stimuli resulting in a learned response.
In reality, people do not respond exactly like
Pavlov's dogs. There are, however, numerous real-world applications for classical conditioning. For example, many dog trainers use classical conditioning techniques to help people train their pets.
These techniques are also useful in the treatment of phobias or anxiety problems. Teachers are able to apply classical conditioning in the class by creating a positive classroom environment to help students overcome anxiety or fear. Pairing an anxiety-provoking situation, such as performing in front of a group, with pleasant surroundings helps the student learn new associations
What is different about life? it is inherited oberwolfach march 7 1 2018Bob Eisenberg
What is different about life? Why do life sciences require different science and mathematics? I address these issues starting from the obvious: all of life is inherited from genes. Twenty thousand genes of say 30 atoms each control an animal of ~1e25 atoms. How is that possible? Answer: the structures of life form a hierarchy of devices that allow handfuls of atoms to control everything. A nerve signal involves meters of nerve but is controlled by a few atoms. Indeed, potassium and sodium differ only in the diameter of the atoms. Life depends on this difference in diameter. Sodium and potassium are otherwise identical. The task of the biological scientist is first to identify the hierarchy of devices and what they do. Then we want to know how the devices work. We want to understand life well enough to improve its devices, in disease and technology.
1. Resolution and composition of forces REV (2).pptVrushali Nalawade
Engineering Mechanics Unit-I
Force System
Composition and Resolution of Forces
Parallelogram Law
Varignon's Theorem
Moment
Newton's Law
Law of Moment
Branches of Mechanics
Adaptation free energy: The third generation of models of physiological ada...Alexander Gorban
Our goal was:
*to understand the classical experiments
*and to build the basic top-down models of physiological adaptation
PLAN: Top-down modelling in the bottom-up era;
Homeostasis and stabilisation;
Selye’s “Adaptation energy” – the universal currency for adaptation;
Goldstone’s critics and development of Selye’s concept;
Factor-resource models: resource, reserve and oscillating death;
Two adaptation in Selye’s experiments: Adaptation in a fitness landscape and adaptation of the fitness landscape;
Adaptation entropy and free energy;
Adaptation to load of many factors;
Questions.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...NelTorrente
In this research, it concludes that while the readiness of teachers in Caloocan City to implement the MATATAG Curriculum is generally positive, targeted efforts in professional development, resource distribution, support networks, and comprehensive preparation can address the existing gaps and ensure successful curriculum implementation.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
2. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
BACKGROUND
Research by Rescorla and Kamin requires a
change in our conception of conditioning.
Animals do not evaluate CS-US pairings in
isolation.
Evaluation occurs against a background that
includes: unpaired presentations of CS and US,
or presentations of other CSs, or general
experimental context.
Conditioning is most likely to occur when
evaluation of entire situation reveals that a CS is
best available predictor of US.
3. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
BACKGROUND
This view of Pavlovian conditioning makes
conditioning process appear much more
complex than it had seemed.
How do animals do it?
By what means do animals keep track of CSs
and USs, estimate probabilities, compute
probability differences, and make CRs to CS?
If such calculations do occur, then animals are
likely to make them automatically.
We need an account of the mechanism by which
such automatic calculation might occur.
4. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
BACKGROUND
In last 30 years, many different theories have
been advanced to explain rich details of
Pavlovian conditioning.
Most influential account was that of Robert A.
Rescorla and Allan R. Wagner in 1972.
All later theories have been responses to
shortcomings of Rescorla-Wagner account.
So, we will focus on Rescorla-Wagner theory.
5. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
PRELUDE
Kamin’s blocking effect set stage for RescorlaWagner model.
Blocking effect suggested to Kamin that USs
were only effective when they were
SURPRISING or unpredicted by CSs.
However, USs were not effective when they
were unsurprising or predicted by CSs.
Added CS was not associated with any change
in US.
6. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
OVERVIEW
Rescorla-Wagner theory explains complex
contingency analysis in terms of simple
associations of the sort Pavlov envisioned.
It can account for most standard conditioning
phenomena in Chapter 3 as well as many newer
phenomena in Chapter 4.
Theory is also precise; specified in such clear
detail that one can derive predictions about
behavior in untested experimental situations.
Mathematically
7. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
TUTORIALS
If you need help, then please consult:
http://psy.uq.oz.au/~landcp/PY269/rwmodel/index.html
http://www.biols.susx.ac.uk/home/Martin_
Yeomans/Learning/Lecture6.html
http://www.psych.ualberta.ca/~msnyder/Ac
ademic/Psych_281/C5/Ch5page.html
8. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
ACQUISITION
Standard conditioning curves are negatively
accelerated.
Changes in conditioning strength are very
substantial early in training.
But, as training proceeds, a leveling-off point, or
asymptote, is approached.
Generally speaking, changes in strength of
conditioning get smaller with each trial.
9. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
ACQUISITION
Negatively accelerated learning curve suggests
that organism does not profit equally from each
training trial.
How much one profits depends on how much
one already knows:
When one knows nothing, profits are substantial (US
surprise is high).
When one knows a great deal, profits from further trials
are small (US surprise is low).
10. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
ACQUISITION
Rather than learning a fixed amount with each
trial, one learns a fixed proportion of difference
between one’s present level of learning and
maximum possible.
As difference gets smaller (as one learns more),
amount of new learning produced by further
trials gets smaller.
Rescorla-Wagner model simply builds in a
mathematical expression that conforms to
negatively accelerated learning function.
11. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
ACQUISITION
Here is the equation:
∆Vn = K( — Vn-1)
V, associative strength, is measure of learning.
It is a theoretical quantity.
It is not equivalent to magnitude or probability of
any particular CR.
But, it is assumed to be closely related to such
measures of conditioned responding.
12. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
ACQUISITION
∆Vn = K( — Vn-1)
K reflects salience of CS.
K can vary between 0 and 1 (0 ≤ K ≤ 1).
Bigger K, bigger change in V on any given trial.
Thus, salient stimuli mean large Ks, which mean
large ∆Vs, which mean large changes in
association from trial to trial.
Intensity
Sensory modality
Organism
Types of US’s employed ( belongingness)
13. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
ACQUISITION
∆Vn = K( — Vn-1)
indicates that different USs support different
maximum levels of conditioning.
Asymptote of conditioning will vary with US;
different asymptotes are reflected by different
s.
More intense US, higher asymptote of
conditioning, and higher .
is always equal to or greater than 0 ( ≥ 0).
14. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
ACQUISITION
∆Vn = K( — Vn-1)
Change in strength on Trial n (∆Vn) is
proportional to difference between and prior
associative strength Vn-1.
Because V grows from trial to trial, quantity ( Vn-1) gets smaller and smaller, so ∆Vn also gets
smaller and smaller, generating a negatively
accelerated learning curve.
Eventually, V will equal , so that ( - Vn-1) will
be 0, and conditioning will be complete
(asymptote will be reached).
15. ∆Vn = K( — Vn-1)
∆ (change in) Delta
V, associative strength, is measure of learning
K reflects salience of CS.
( Lambda) indicates that different USs support
different maximum levels of conditioning.
Change in strength on Trial n (∆Vn) is
proportional to difference between and
Vn-1 prior associative strength.
16. Acquisition Trials
First conditioning trial:
Light (CS) is paired with shock (US)
∆Vn= light (CS)=0
k = .20
= associated
strength of shock
= 100
∆Vn = K( — Vn-1)
∆ (change in) Delta
V, associative strength,
is measure of learning
K reflects salience of CS
and US.
( Lambda) indicates that
different USs support
different maximum levels
of conditioning.
Change in strength on
Trial n (∆Vn) is
proportional to difference
between and
Vn-1 prior associative
strength.
First Trial
∆Vn=k( -Vn-1)
∆Vn= .20(100-0)
∆Vn = .20 units
17. ∆Vn = K( — Vn-1)
Acquisition Trials
First conditioning trial:
Light (CS) is paired with shock (US)
∆Vtotal= light (CS)=0
k = .20
= associated
strength of shock
= 100
∆ (change in) Delta
V, associative strength, is
measure of learning
K reflects salience of CS and
US.
( Lambda) indicates that
different USs support different
maximum levels of
conditioning.
Change in strength on Trial n
(∆Vn) is proportional to
difference between and
Vn-1 prior associative strength.
Second Trial
∆Vn=k( -Vn-1)
∆Vn= .20(100-20)
∆Vn = .16 units
18. ∆Vn = K( — Vn-1)
Acquisition Trials
First conditioning trial:
Light (CS) is paired with shock (US)
∆Vtotal= light (CS)=0
k = .20
= associated
strength of shock
= 100
∆ (change in) Delta
V, associative strength, is
measure of learning
K reflects salience of CS and
US.
( Lambda) indicates that
different USs support different
maximum levels of
conditioning.
Change in strength on Trial n
(∆Vn) is proportional to
difference between and
Vn-1 prior associative strength.
Third Trial
∆Vn=k( -Vn-1)
∆Vn= .20(100-36)
∆Vn = .12.8 units
19. ∆Vn = K( — Vn-1)
Acquisition Trials
First conditioning trial:
Light (CS) is paired with shock (US)
∆Vtotal= light (CS)=0
k = .20
= associated
strength of shock
= 100
∆ (change in) Delta
V, associative strength, is
measure of learning
K reflects salience of CS and
US.
( Lambda) indicates that
different USs support different
maximum levels of
conditioning.
Change in strength on Trial n
(∆Vn) is proportional to
difference between and
Vn-1 prior associative strength.
Forth Trial
∆Vn=k( -Vn-1)
∆Vn= .20(100-48.8)
∆Vn = .10.2 units
N= trial4, N-1= trial 3
20. Rescorla-Wagner Model
Calculations from
the RescorlaWagner model
show a
mathematical
relationship to the
process of
conditioning
60
50
40
30
Vtotal
20
10
0
trial
0
trial
2
trail
4
21. Rescorla-Wagner Theory (1972)
Organisms only learn when
events violate their expectations
(like Kamin’s surprise hypothesis)
Expectations are built up when
‘significant’ events follow a
stimulus complex
These expectations are only
modified when consequent events
disagree with the composite
expectation
Surprise
22. First Conditioning Trial
Trial
1
K ( - Vn-1 )
.5 * 100 -
=
0
∆Vn
=
50
Associative Strength (V)
100
80
∆Vn = K( — Vn-1)
60
50
40
20
0
0
0
1
2
3
4
Trials
5
6
7
8
∆ (change in) Delta
V, associative strength, is
measure of learning
K reflects salience of CS and
US.
( Lambda) indicates that
different USs support different
maximum levels of
conditioning.
Change in strength on Trial n
(∆Vn) is proportional to
difference between and
Vn-1 prior associative strength.
28. 7th Conditioning Trial
Trial
7
K ( - Vn-1 )
.5 * 100 - 98.44
Associative Strength (V)
100
87.5
80
=
=
96.8898.4499.22
93.75
∆Vn = K( — Vn-1)
75
60
50
40
20
0
0
0
1
2
∆Vn
.78
3
4
Trials
5
6
7
8
∆ (change in) Delta
V, associative strength, is
measure of learning
K reflects salience of CS and
US.
( Lambda) indicates that
different USs support different
maximum levels of
conditioning.
Change in strength on Trial n
(∆Vn) is proportional to
difference between and
Vn-1 prior associative strength.
35. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
COMPETITION
Key feature of Rescorla-Wagner model is how it
explains conditioning with compound stimuli
comprising two or more elements.
Associative strength of a compound stimulus is
assumed to equal the sum of associative
strengths of elements.
VAX = VA + VX
Here, A and X may have different saliences, K
and M, respectively.
36. ∆Vn = K( — Vn-1)
∆ (change in) Delta
V, associative strength, is measure of learning
K reflects salience of CS.
( Lambda) indicates that different USs support different maximum levels
of conditioning.
Change in strength on Trial n (∆Vn) is proportional to difference
between and
Vn-1 prior associative strength.
A,X symbols used for multiple CS’s
Salience with multiple CS’s: A=K,
X=M
37. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
OVERSHADOWING
VAX = VA + VX
How can theory account for overshadowing?
With equally salient stimuli, VX would attain only
.50 rather than 1.00 if X alone were trained-mutual overshadowing.
Increases in salience of A would further reduce
VX from .50 toward .00.
If salience of A (K) is very high and salience of X
(M) is very low, then overshadowing should be
complete.
38. Eyeblink Conditioning: OVERSHADOWING
Training: Tone/light + Shock
Tone = Eyeblink CR
Light = ?
No CR to light
Corneal Air Puff
Elicits Eyeblink Response
Corneal Air Puff
Given with Tone
Tone Given Alone
Elicits Eyeblink Response
41. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
BLOCKING
VAX = VA + VX
How would theory account for blocking?
With equally salient stimuli, VX would be only .50
rather than 1.00 if AX only were trained.
Prior training with A would further reduce VX,
because VA would already be substantial before
AX trials were introduced.
Extensive training with A should lead to
complete blocking of X.
44. The Rescorla-Wagner associative model of conditioning is based upon
four assumptions that refer to the process by which the CS and UC gain
associative strength
(1) a particular US can only support a specific
level of conditioning,
(2) associative strength increases with each
reinforced trial, but depends upon prior
conditioning,
(3) particular CSs and US can support different
rates of conditioning and
(4) when two or more stimuli are paired with the
UC, the stimuli compete for the associative
strength available for conditioning.
45. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
CONTINGENCY
Theory can also explain animals’ ability to detect
different degrees of contingency between CS
and US.
Recall that fear of a CS for shock is a direct
function of contingency between CS and US.
When contingency between events is zero, no
learning of fear to CS occurs.
But, does a rat really compute probabilities to
form a judgment of contingency?
Not according to Rescorla-Wagner model.
46. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
CONTINGENCY
To explain contingency
sensitivity, Rescorla-Wagner
theory makes use of
background or contextual
stimuli as Pavlovian predictors.
(Context = A discrete CS)
Such contextual stimuli
themselves can compete with
CSs for association with USs.
Case of random presentations
of CS and US provides a useful
illustration.
47. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
CONTINGENCY
Random training can be seen to represent blocking with two kinds of
trials:
A (context)-US [relatively frequent]
AX (context plus CS)-US [relatively infrequent]
As animal receives frequent A-US pairings, VA (and hence VAX)
approaches asymptote.
As VAX approaches asymptote from frequent A-US pairings, VX can
receive no further increments and little responding to X will be
observed despite occasional AX-US pairings.
CS
unpaired
US
0.5 s
time
48. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
CONTINGENCY
So, blocking is basic to effect of random CS and
US presentations.
Contextual cues are present whenever US
occurs in absence of CS; contextual cues thus
acquire excitatory strength.
On trials when CS is paired with US by chance,
contextual cues are present as well.
So, context replaces Stimulus A in blocking
example and randomly presented CS replaces
Stimulus X.
49. RESCORLA-WAGNER THEORY:
INHIBITION
In Chapter 4, we saw that conditioning can be
either excitatory or inhibitory.
At first glance, it is not obvious that RescorlaWagner theory can explain inhibition.
Inhibition requires a V that is less than zero; but,
none of the variables in the equation can ever
be less than zero.
How can V become negative when
none of the terms contributing to V
can be negative?