This document provides an overview of planning educational research. It discusses frameworks for planning research, conducting literature reviews, orienting decisions, research design and methodology, data analysis, and presenting results. Different types of research are described, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Key elements of research design are outlined. The document also discusses operationalizing research questions, sources for literature reviews, developing hypotheses, and ensuring quality in research planning.

1. PLANNING EDUCATIONAL
RESEARCH
© LOUIS COHEN, LAWRENCE
MANION, KEITH MORRISON

2. STRUCTURE OF THE CHAPTER
• Approaching research planning
• A framework for planning research
• Conducting and reporting a literature review
• Searching for literature on the internet
• Orienting decisions in planning research
• Research design and methodology
• How to operationalize research questions
• Data analysis
• Presenting and reporting the results
• A planning matrix for research
• Managing the planning of research
• Ensuring quality in the planning of research

3. KINDS OF RESEARCH
PURPOSE
KINDS OF RESEARCH
Does the research want to test
a hypothesis or theory?
Experiment, survey, action
research, case study
Does the research want to
develop a theory?
Ethnography, qualitative
research, grounded theory
Does the research need to
measure?
Survey, experiment
Doe the research want to
understand a situation?
Ethnographic and interpretive/
qualitative approaches
Does the research want to see
what happens if . . . ?
Experiment, participatory
research, action research
Does the research want to find
out ‘what’ and ‘why’?
Mixed methods research
Does the research want to find
out what happened in the
past?
Historical research

4. ELEMENTS OF RESEARCH DESIGN
• Statement of the problem/
what gave rise to the
research;
• Grounding in literature;
• Constraints on the research
(e.g. access, time, people,
politics);
• Aims and purposes;
• Intended outcomes;
• Nature of the phenomena to
be investigated
• Operationalizing research
aims and purposes;
• Research questions;
• Foci of the research;
• Priorities for the research;
• Methodology/kind of research;
• Ethical issues;
• Ownership of the research
and data;
• Politics of the research;
• Audiences of the research;
• Instrumentation;
• Sampling;
• Piloting;
• Time frames and sequence;
• Resources required;
• Reliability and validity:
• Data analysis;
• Verifying/validating data;
• Reporting/writing up the
research.

5. WHAT KIND OF RESEARCH?
• Positivist
• Post-positivist
• Quantitative, scientific
and hypothesis-testing
• Qualitative
• Interpretive
• Naturalistic
• Phenomenological
• Existential
• Interactionist
• Ethnographic
• Experimental
• Ideology critical
• Participatory
• Feminist
• Political
• Complexity theoretical
• Evaluative
• Mixed methods

6. A POSSIBLE SEQUENCE OF QUANTITATIVE
RESEARCH
1. Literature review →
2. Generate and formulate the hypothesis/the theory to
be tested/the research questions to be addressed →
3. Design the research to test the hypothesis/theory (e.g.
an experiment a survey) →
4. Conduct the research →
5. Analyze results →
6. Consider alternative explanations for the findings →
7. Report whether the hypothesis/theory is supported or
not supported, and/or answer the research questions
→
8. Consider the generalizability of the findings.

7. A POSSIBLE SEQUENCE OF QUALITATIVE
RESEARCH
1. Identify the topic/group/phenomenon for research →
2. Literature review →
3. Design research questions, research and data collection →
4. Locate fields of study and your role in the research/situation →
5. Locate informants, gatekeepers, sources of information →
6. Develop working relations with participants →
7. Conduct the research and the data collection simultaneously →
8. Conduct the data analysis either simultaneously, on an ongoing
basis as the situation emerges and evolves, or conduct the
data analysis subsequent to the research →
9. Report results and the grounded theory or answers to the
research questions that emerge from the research →
10. Generate a hypothesis for further research or testing.

8. A POSSIBLE SEQUENCE OF MIXED
METHODS RESEARCH
• Identify the problem or issue to investigate →
• Formulate research questions →
• Identify the several kinds of data and the methods for
collecting them which, together and/or separately will
yield answers to the research questions →
• Plan the mixed methods design (e.g. parallel mixed
design, fully integrated mixed design, sequential mixed
design →
• Conduct the research →
• Analyze results →
• Consider alternative explanations for the findings →
• Answer the research questions →
• Report the results.

9. MAXWELL’S INTERACTIVE MODEL
OF RESEARCH DESIGN
GOALS
CONCEPTUAL
FRAMEWORK
RESEARCH
QUESTIONS
METHODSVALIDITY

10. A SEQUENCE OF CONSIDERATIONS
PREPARATORY
ISSUES
METHODOLOGY
SAMPLING &
INSTRUMENTATION
TIMING &
SEQUENCING
Ontology, epistemology, constraints,
purposes, foci, ethics, research
question, politics, literature review
Approaches, reliability, validity
Reliability, validity, piloting

11. A SEQUENCE OF CONSIDERATIONS
ORIENTING
DECISIONS
RESEARCH DESIGN
& METHODOLOGY
DATA ANALYSIS
PRESENTING AND
REPORTING RESULTS
E.G. SURVEY,
EXPERIMENT,
NATURALISTIC, CASE
STUDY, ACTION
RESEARCH, TESTING

12. ORIENTING DECISIONS
1. Who wants the research?
2. Who will receive the research?
3. What powers do the recipients of the research have?
4. What are the time scales of the research?
5. What are the purposes of the research?
6. What are the research questions?
7. What must be the focus in order to answer the
research questions?
8. What costs are there – human, material, physical,
administrative, temporal?
9. Who owns the research?
10. At what point does the ownership pass from the
respondent to the researcher and from the
researcher to the recipients?

13. RESEARCH DESIGN & METHODOLOGY
1. What are the specific purposes of the research?
2. How are the general research purposes and aims
operationalized into specific research questions?
3. What are the specific research questions?
4. What needs to be the focus of the research in order
to answer the research questions?
5. What is the main methodology of the research?
6. How will validity and reliability be addressed?
7. How will reflexivity be addressed?
8. What kinds of data are required?
9. From whom will data be acquired (i.e. sampling)?
10. Where else will data be available?
11. How will the data be gathered (i.e. instrumentation)?
12. Who will undertake the research?

14. DATA ANALYSIS
1. How will the data be analyzed?
2. How to verify and validate the data and their
interpretation?

15. PRESENTING & REPORTING THE RESULTS
1. How to write up and report the research?
2. When to write up and report the research (e.g.
ongoing or summative)?
3. How to present the results in tabular and/or
written-out form?
4. How to present the results in non-verbal forms?
5. To whom to report (the necessary and possible
audiences of the research)?
6. How frequently to report?

16. A SAMPLE PLANNING MATRIX
Time
Sample
Stage 1
(start)
Stage 2
(3 months)
Stage 3
(6 months)
Stage 4
(9 months)
Stage 5
(12 months)
Principal/
Headteacher
Documents
Interview
Questionnaire 1
Interview Documents
Questionnaire 2
Interview Documents
Interview
Questionnaire 3
Teacher
group 1
Questionnaire 1 Questionnaire 2 Questionnaire 3
Teacher
group 2
Questionnaire 1 Questionnaire 2 Questionnaire 3
Teacher
group 3
Questionnaire 1 Questionnaire 2 Questionnaire 3
Students Questionnaire 2 Interview
Parents Questionnaire 1 Questionnaire 2 Questionnaire 3
University
staff
Interview
Documents
Interview
Documents

17. THE LITERATURE REVIEW MUST . . .
• Set out the argument(s) that it will advance.
• Set out points in favour of the argument(s) or
thesis to be advanced/supported.
• Set out points against the argument(s) or thesis
to be advanced/supported.
• Have a conclusion based on the points raised
and evidence presented.

18. THE LITERATURE REVIEW . . .
• establishes and justifies the need for the research ,its
significance, originality and foci;
• establishes and justifies the methodology to be adopted;
• has an organized and developed argument, not just a
descriptive summary;
• presents, contextualizes, analyzes, interprets, critiques,
and evaluates sources and issues, not just accepting
what they say;
• presents arguments and counter-arguments, evidence
and counter-evidence about an issue;
• reveals similarities and differences between authors,
about the same issue;
• states its purposes, foci, methods of working,
organization and how it will move to a conclusion, i.e.
what it will do, what it will argue, what it will show, what it
will conclude, and how this links into or informs the
subsequent research project;

19. THE LITERATURE REVIEW . . .
• is a springboard into, and foundation for, all areas
and stages of the research in question: purpose,
foci, research questions, methodology, data
analysis, discussion and conclusions;
• must be conclusive;
• must be focused yet comprehensive in its coverage
of relevant issues;
• must present both sides of an issue or argument;
• should address theories, models (where relevant),
empirical research, methodological materials,
substantive issues, concepts, content and elements
of the field in question;
• must include and draw on many sources and types
of written material and kinds of data.

20. SOURCES OF LITERATURE IN A
LITERATURE REVIEW
• Books
• Journal articles:
academic &
professional
• Empirical research
• Non-empirical research
• Reports
• Policy documents
• Public and private
records
• Research papers &
reports
• Theses and
dissertations
• Manuscripts
• Databases (hard copy/
online)
• Conference papers
• Electronic media
• Primary sources
• Secondary sources
• Tertiary sources

21. OPERATIONALIZING RESEARCH
• Specify a set of operations or behaviours that
can be measured, addressed or manipulated.
• Translate a very general research aim or
purpose into specific, concrete questions to
which specific, concrete answers can be given.
• Move from the general to the particular, from the
abstract to the concrete.
• Break down each general research purpose or
general aim into more specific research
purposes and constituent elements, continuing
the process until specific, concrete questions
have been reached to which specific answers
can be provided.

22. A GOOD HYPOTHESIS . . .
• is clear on whether it is directional or non-
directional;
• is written in a testable form;
• is written in a form that can yield measurable
results.

23. A FOUR-STAGE PLANNING
PROCESS
STAGE ONE:
IDENTIFY THE PURPOSES OF THE RESEARCH
STAGE TWO:
IDENTIFY AND GIVE PRIORITY TO THE CONSTRAINTS
UNDER WHICH THE RESEARCH WILL TAKE PLACE
STAGE THREE:
PLAN THE POSSIBILITIES FOR THE RESEARCH
WITHIN THESE CONSTRAINTS
STAGE FOUR:
DECIDE THE RESEARCH DESIGN

24. ENSURING QUALITY IN RESEARCH
PLANNING (Furlong and Oancea, 2005)
FITNESS FOR PURPOSE
• Theoretical and methodological robustness:
– The trustworthiness’ of the research;
– Its ‘contribution to knowledge’;
– Its ‘explicitness in designing and reporting’;
– Its ‘propriety’ (conformance to legal and ethical
requirements);
– The ‘paradigm-dependence’(fidelity to the
paradigm, ontology and epistemological premises
of the research) that the research demonstrates;

25. ENSURING QUALITY IN RESEARCH
PLANNING (Furlong and Oancea, 2005)
FITNESS FOR PURPOSE
• Value for use:
– The ‘salience/timeliness’ of the research;
– Its ‘purposivity’ (fitness for purpose);
– Its ‘specificity and accessibility’(scope,
responsiveness to user needs, and predicted
usage);
– Its ‘concern for enabling impact’(dissemination for
impact); and
– Its ‘flexibility and operationalisability’(development
into practical terms and utility for audiences).

26. ENSURING QUALITY IN RESEARCH
PLANNING (Furlong and Oancea, 2005)
FITNESS FOR PURPOSE
• Capacity building and value for people:
– ‘Partnership, collaboration and engagement’;
– ‘Plausibility’ (‘from the practitioner’s perspective’);
– ‘Reflection and criticism’(research that develops
reflexivity and self-reflection);
– ‘Receptiveness’(research that enhances the
receptiveness of practitioners and a wider
audience);
– ‘Stimulating personal growth’.

27. ENSURING QUALITY IN RESEARCH
PLANNING (Furlong and Oancea, 2005)
FITNESS FOR PURPOSE
• Economic dimension:
– ‘Cost-effectiveness’;
– ‘Marketability’ and ‘competitiveness’(e.g. in
the research market);
– ‘Auditability’;
– ‘Feasibility’;
– ‘Originality’;
– ‘Value-efficiency’.