Evgenii, Roelof & Sjoerd
Mission
To establish Andrews Co. as a broad differentiator

of the sensor industry by producing quality,
low-priced products that capture the market
share and maintain a competitive edge.
Value proposition
• To strive for the market leadership in Low
segment by serving our customers’ needs
• To constantly innovate our top products
• To launch new products, which offer
more choice for the customer
Strategy Overview
Place all products on middle line and
keep them there. Products can drift
backwards.

Two new products:
Awsome for High End segment
Arie to conquer Traditional segment
Strategy R&D
• Meet customer criteria
• Shift all current products for
placement within fine cut circle
• Produce new product in performance
& traditional segments
• Repositioning the products towards
the long-term prospective
Strategy Marketing
• Competitive pricing strategy
• Achieve 100% awareness &
accessibility
• Accuretly forecast upcoming years’
sales based on units demanded
and potential market share
Strategy Production
• Heavy investments in capasity and
automation of the plant
• Avoiding 2-nd shifts
• Aiming 0% inventory
Strategy Finance
• To find a perfect levarage level
between long-term debt, current
debt, stock & retained earnings
• Build buffers to cope with
unforeseen declining sales (=8 mln)
Strategy HRM & TQM
• Training & recruiting to the
highest standards
• Investing heavily into reducing
cost via TQM (2 rounds)
Round 1
• Testing the game
• Positioned everything within cost & reason to
fit the ideal spot
• High promo & sales budgets
 Made profits of 3.3 mln
 Focused on all products (low margin)
Round 2
• Proceeded with the Round 1 strategy
• Focused on customer criteria
• Focused on increasing profit margin

 Made profits of 7.8 mln
 Increased stock price by $7.50
Round 3
• Created Arie (Traditional) & Awesome
(Performance)
• Invested heavily in capacity,
automation, R&D and TQM
• Outspent all competitors on promo &
sales budgets
 Steep decrease in stock price (-$10)
 Big Al visit ($2.7 mln)
Round 4
• Invested in capacity again
• Positioned all products for the ideal spots
for Round 6
• Again focused on products (!)
• High promo & sales budgets investments
 Made loss ($2 mln)
 Stock price decreased by $2
 Lost some advanted on labor negotiations
Round 5
• Focused on 3 segments (instead on all)
• Dropped Agape
• New products gained some awareness &
sales
 Made profits of 4.5 mln
 Stock price increased by $8.5
 Became market leader in Low (37%)
Round 6
• Positioned Awesome and Arie into
ideal spot and let the other ones flow
• Managed capacity
• Avoided inventories
• Lowered promo & sales budgets
 Good profits ($18.9 mln)
 Very good profit margin
 Increase in stock price by more than
50%
Results
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Cumulative profit $ 35,693,912
18,9% Total market share
Competing seriously in 4 segments
Market leader in Low segment
3rd most valuable company at $ 167,000,000
Share value growth almost 50% last year
Initial strategy had its flaws bacause shifting products is very costly
& time-consuming
• Products performed poorly in between segments
SWOT team Andrews
Strengths:
 Great team work
 Versiitility
 Good long-term strategy

Weaknesses:
 Busy Schedule
 Difficulties in initial rounds with platform work
 Betting on all ducks fot too long
Future growth
•
•
•
•
•

Continue position in Low Segment
Refine position in Trad segment
Add product in High segment
Divest product in Performance segment
Continue investing in Andrews company as we did

Capsim Andrews Results Presentation

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Mission To establish AndrewsCo. as a broad differentiator of the sensor industry by producing quality, low-priced products that capture the market share and maintain a competitive edge.
  • 3.
    Value proposition • Tostrive for the market leadership in Low segment by serving our customers’ needs • To constantly innovate our top products • To launch new products, which offer more choice for the customer
  • 4.
    Strategy Overview Place allproducts on middle line and keep them there. Products can drift backwards. Two new products: Awsome for High End segment Arie to conquer Traditional segment
  • 5.
    Strategy R&D • Meetcustomer criteria • Shift all current products for placement within fine cut circle • Produce new product in performance & traditional segments • Repositioning the products towards the long-term prospective
  • 6.
    Strategy Marketing • Competitivepricing strategy • Achieve 100% awareness & accessibility • Accuretly forecast upcoming years’ sales based on units demanded and potential market share
  • 7.
    Strategy Production • Heavyinvestments in capasity and automation of the plant • Avoiding 2-nd shifts • Aiming 0% inventory
  • 8.
    Strategy Finance • Tofind a perfect levarage level between long-term debt, current debt, stock & retained earnings • Build buffers to cope with unforeseen declining sales (=8 mln)
  • 9.
    Strategy HRM &TQM • Training & recruiting to the highest standards • Investing heavily into reducing cost via TQM (2 rounds)
  • 10.
    Round 1 • Testingthe game • Positioned everything within cost & reason to fit the ideal spot • High promo & sales budgets  Made profits of 3.3 mln  Focused on all products (low margin)
  • 11.
    Round 2 • Proceededwith the Round 1 strategy • Focused on customer criteria • Focused on increasing profit margin  Made profits of 7.8 mln  Increased stock price by $7.50
  • 12.
    Round 3 • CreatedArie (Traditional) & Awesome (Performance) • Invested heavily in capacity, automation, R&D and TQM • Outspent all competitors on promo & sales budgets  Steep decrease in stock price (-$10)  Big Al visit ($2.7 mln)
  • 13.
    Round 4 • Investedin capacity again • Positioned all products for the ideal spots for Round 6 • Again focused on products (!) • High promo & sales budgets investments  Made loss ($2 mln)  Stock price decreased by $2  Lost some advanted on labor negotiations
  • 14.
    Round 5 • Focusedon 3 segments (instead on all) • Dropped Agape • New products gained some awareness & sales  Made profits of 4.5 mln  Stock price increased by $8.5  Became market leader in Low (37%)
  • 15.
    Round 6 • PositionedAwesome and Arie into ideal spot and let the other ones flow • Managed capacity • Avoided inventories • Lowered promo & sales budgets  Good profits ($18.9 mln)  Very good profit margin  Increase in stock price by more than 50%
  • 16.
    Results • • • • • • • Cumulative profit $35,693,912 18,9% Total market share Competing seriously in 4 segments Market leader in Low segment 3rd most valuable company at $ 167,000,000 Share value growth almost 50% last year Initial strategy had its flaws bacause shifting products is very costly & time-consuming • Products performed poorly in between segments
  • 17.
    SWOT team Andrews Strengths: Great team work  Versiitility  Good long-term strategy Weaknesses:  Busy Schedule  Difficulties in initial rounds with platform work  Betting on all ducks fot too long
  • 18.
    Future growth • • • • • Continue positionin Low Segment Refine position in Trad segment Add product in High segment Divest product in Performance segment Continue investing in Andrews company as we did