AN UNUSUAL CASE OF GLAUCOMA
DR. AAYUSH TANDON
M.S Ophthalmology
CASE
Presentation
A 21 year old male patient presented with
Mild blurring of vision in right eye
Redness in right eye
3 months
Scar Mark
Past History
•Road traffic accident one year back,
resulting in fracture of right maxillary bone
& right zygomatic bone.
•Operated by maxillo-facial surgeon by
applying titanium plates for fixation of
fractures.
Medical History:
No history of headache, hypertension or
diabetes.
Personal History:
Sleep, appetite,bowel and bladder habits unaltered.
General Examination:
•Conscious, oriented
•Averagely built and well nourished
•BP- 118/74 mm of Hg, Pulse- 84/min
Systemic Examination:
•CVS: S1S2 heard, no murmurs.
•Lungs: Equal air entry and symmetrical
expansion bilaterally.
•Abdomen: Soft, Non tender.
•Neurological Examination: Alert and oriented.
Ophthalmic Examination
Ophthalmic Examination
MANAGEMENT
• Patient underwent Perimetry – Visual Fields
were normal
• Timolol Maleate 0.5% e/d BD in right eye.
• Frequent follow up was advised for IOP
monitoring and to gauge treatment response.
1st
FOLLOW UP (1 Month)
• Visual acuity remined the same in both eyes
• Dilated and tortous episcleral veins were seen in the RE
• No disc odema was seen on fundus examination
• Perimetry was repeated - Fields were still normal
• Brimonidine 0.2% e/d BD started in the right eye over
and above timolol 0.5% e/d to control the IOP
• Patient was advised frequent follow to gauge the
treatment response
2nd
FOLLOW UP (3 months)
• Mild proptosis seen in both eyes (R>>L)
• More dilated episcleral vessels seen in the right eye
• Gonioscopy was repeated – Both eyes showed open
angle
• No disc oedema seen on fundus examination
IOP still rising ???
• Taking in consideration proptosis, dilated
episcleral vessels and past history of trauma
further evaluation was done which revealed
significant findings.
1) On palpation, arterial pulsations were felt on
both sides
2) On auscultation of the orbit, bruit was heard
Provisional diagnosis of CAROTID CAVERNOUS
FISTULA was made
• Dorzolamide 2% e/d BD was started in the
right eye over and above Timolol and
Brimonidine e/d
• Timolol 0.5% eye drop BD started in the left
eye also
• Patient was advised further investigations to
confirm the diagnosis
COLOUR DOPPLER
Dilated and tortuous superior ophthalmic veins with
reversal of flow in both eyes
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) BRAIN
AND ORBIT (CONTRAST STUDY) WITH MAGNETIC
RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY (MRA)
Congestion of both superior ophthalmic veins and
cavernous sinuses
Clinical diagnosis of
‘Carotid Cavernous Fistula’
was confirmed.
• Patient was referred to higher centre for
further management to be done by
Neurologist and Interventional Radiologist
• He was advised to get a Cerebral Angiography
(GOLD STANDARD) done to know to exact type
and location of the fistula.
TREATMENT
• Patient was treated by interventional
embolization by coiling of fistula.
• Patient followed up to us regurlarly after
embolization
• His signs and symptoms started reducing
gradually
• Anti glaucoma medication was gradually
tapered.
• IOP in both eyes came down to 18 mm of Hg
CAROTID CAVERNOUS
FISTULA
• Type of arteriovenous fistula
• Abnormal communication
between the internal or external
carotid arteries and the
cavernous sinus
Direct carotid-cavernous sinus fistulae
2 types1
Dural carotid-cavernous sinus fistulae
TYPES
(Barrow DL, Spector RH, Braun IF, Landman JA, Tindall SC, Tindall GT: Classification and treatment of
spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas. J Neurosurg 62:248–256, 1985)
TYPES
OPHTHALMIC MANIFESTATIONS
OPHTHALMIC MANIFESTATIONS
GLAUCOMA IN CAROTID-CAVERNOUS FISTULA
Other Factors
•Elevation of orbital pressure secondary to venous
stasis and edema
•Anterior segment neovascularization
•In extreme cases Secondary angle closure occurs
due to congestion of the choroid and ciliary body
and a forward shift of iris diaphragm
TREATMENT
“Completely occlude the fistula while preserving
the normal flow of blood through the ICA”
(I)Endovascular Intervention
(I) Trans arterial Embolization
(II) Trans venous Embolization
(II)Surgical Intervention
(III)Radiosurgical Intervention
Summary
– CAROTID CAVERNOUS FISTULA occurs in just 0.2%
of patients with cranio-cerebral trauma
– Commonly seen in young male patients
– Bilateral involvement is seen in 1% – 2% of patients
with post traumatic fistulas.
- Life threatening sequelae (Intracranial
hemorrhage, SAH etc) if not diagnosed and treated in
time.
• A patient having CAROTID CAVERNOUS FISTULA may rarely
present to an OPHTHALMOLOGIST.
• Because the symptoms and signs of a Carotid Cavernous
Fistula often are mild in the initial stages (specially with
Indirect/Dural fistulas), this lesion is difficult to diagnose
and is often misdiagnosed as chronic conjunctivitis,
blepharoconjunctivitis or POAG
• Therefore a high index of suspicion is required for the
correct diagnosis and management
CONCLUSION
Our case was Rarest of rare
 Complete resolution of Intractable
glaucoma, proptosis and congestion
occurred after correct treatment
Life threatening complications could be
avoided
Why have we presented this case ?
REFERENCES
1. Jason A , Hannah G, Sande P, Philip M. Carotid-cavernous fistulas.
Neurosurg Focus. 32 (5):E9, 2012, 314-23.
2. Borba LAB, Al-Mefty O: Normal anatomy of the cavernous sinus, in
Eisenberg MB, Al-Mefty O (eds): The Cavernous Sinus: A
Comprehensive Text. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000,
pg 21–34.
3. Pedersen RA, Troost BT, Schramm VL: Carotid-cavernous sinus fistula
after external ethmoid-sphenoid surgery. Clinical course and
management. Arch Otolaryngol 107:307–309,1981.
4. Isamat F, Twose J, Conesa G: Surgical management of cavernous-
carotid fistulas, in Eisenberg MB, Al-Mefty O (eds): The Cavernous
Sinus: a Comprehensive Text. Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins, 2000, pp 201–208.
5. Hirai T, Korogi Y, Goto K, Ogata N, Sakamoto Y, Takahashi M: Carotid-
cavernous sinus fistula and aneurysmal rupture associated with
REFERENCES
6. De Keizer R: Carotid-cavernous and orbital arteriovenous fistulas:
ocular features, diagnostic and hemodynamic considerations in relation
to visual impairment and morbidity. Orbit; 22:121–142, 2003.
7. Lewis AI, Tomsick TA, Tew JM Jr: Management of 100 consecutive
direct carotid-cavernous fistulas: results of treatment with detachable
balloons. Neurosurgery; 36:239–245, 1995.
8. Schroth G, Lovblad O, Ozdoba C, Remonda L. Non-traumatic
neurological emergencies: emergency neuroradiological interventions.
Eur Radiol 2002;12:1648–1662.
9. Uchino A, Hasuo K, Matsumoto S, Masuda K. MRI of dural carotid-
cavernous fistulas. Comparisons with postcontrast CT. Clin Imaging.
Oct-Dec 1992;16(4):263-8.
10. Elster AD, Chen MY, Richardson DN, Yeatts PR. Dilated intercavernous
sinuses: an MR sign of carotid-cavernous and carotid-dural fistulas.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Jul-Aug 1991;12(4):641-5.
THANK YOU
CAROTID CAVERNOUS FISTULA patient may
present with raised intraocular pressure and
the etiology may remained undiagnosed unless
thorough evaluation is done

An Unusual case of Glaucoma

  • 1.
    AN UNUSUAL CASEOF GLAUCOMA DR. AAYUSH TANDON M.S Ophthalmology
  • 2.
    CASE Presentation A 21 yearold male patient presented with Mild blurring of vision in right eye Redness in right eye 3 months Scar Mark
  • 3.
    Past History •Road trafficaccident one year back, resulting in fracture of right maxillary bone & right zygomatic bone. •Operated by maxillo-facial surgeon by applying titanium plates for fixation of fractures.
  • 4.
    Medical History: No historyof headache, hypertension or diabetes. Personal History: Sleep, appetite,bowel and bladder habits unaltered. General Examination: •Conscious, oriented •Averagely built and well nourished •BP- 118/74 mm of Hg, Pulse- 84/min
  • 5.
    Systemic Examination: •CVS: S1S2heard, no murmurs. •Lungs: Equal air entry and symmetrical expansion bilaterally. •Abdomen: Soft, Non tender. •Neurological Examination: Alert and oriented.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    MANAGEMENT • Patient underwentPerimetry – Visual Fields were normal • Timolol Maleate 0.5% e/d BD in right eye. • Frequent follow up was advised for IOP monitoring and to gauge treatment response.
  • 9.
    1st FOLLOW UP (1Month) • Visual acuity remined the same in both eyes • Dilated and tortous episcleral veins were seen in the RE • No disc odema was seen on fundus examination • Perimetry was repeated - Fields were still normal • Brimonidine 0.2% e/d BD started in the right eye over and above timolol 0.5% e/d to control the IOP • Patient was advised frequent follow to gauge the treatment response
  • 10.
    2nd FOLLOW UP (3months) • Mild proptosis seen in both eyes (R>>L) • More dilated episcleral vessels seen in the right eye • Gonioscopy was repeated – Both eyes showed open angle • No disc oedema seen on fundus examination
  • 11.
  • 12.
    • Taking inconsideration proptosis, dilated episcleral vessels and past history of trauma further evaluation was done which revealed significant findings. 1) On palpation, arterial pulsations were felt on both sides 2) On auscultation of the orbit, bruit was heard Provisional diagnosis of CAROTID CAVERNOUS FISTULA was made
  • 13.
    • Dorzolamide 2%e/d BD was started in the right eye over and above Timolol and Brimonidine e/d • Timolol 0.5% eye drop BD started in the left eye also • Patient was advised further investigations to confirm the diagnosis
  • 14.
    COLOUR DOPPLER Dilated andtortuous superior ophthalmic veins with reversal of flow in both eyes
  • 15.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING(MRI) BRAIN AND ORBIT (CONTRAST STUDY) WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY (MRA) Congestion of both superior ophthalmic veins and cavernous sinuses
  • 16.
    Clinical diagnosis of ‘CarotidCavernous Fistula’ was confirmed.
  • 17.
    • Patient wasreferred to higher centre for further management to be done by Neurologist and Interventional Radiologist • He was advised to get a Cerebral Angiography (GOLD STANDARD) done to know to exact type and location of the fistula.
  • 18.
    TREATMENT • Patient wastreated by interventional embolization by coiling of fistula. • Patient followed up to us regurlarly after embolization • His signs and symptoms started reducing gradually • Anti glaucoma medication was gradually tapered. • IOP in both eyes came down to 18 mm of Hg
  • 19.
  • 20.
    • Type ofarteriovenous fistula • Abnormal communication between the internal or external carotid arteries and the cavernous sinus Direct carotid-cavernous sinus fistulae 2 types1 Dural carotid-cavernous sinus fistulae
  • 21.
    TYPES (Barrow DL, SpectorRH, Braun IF, Landman JA, Tindall SC, Tindall GT: Classification and treatment of spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas. J Neurosurg 62:248–256, 1985)
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
    GLAUCOMA IN CAROTID-CAVERNOUSFISTULA Other Factors •Elevation of orbital pressure secondary to venous stasis and edema •Anterior segment neovascularization •In extreme cases Secondary angle closure occurs due to congestion of the choroid and ciliary body and a forward shift of iris diaphragm
  • 26.
    TREATMENT “Completely occlude thefistula while preserving the normal flow of blood through the ICA” (I)Endovascular Intervention (I) Trans arterial Embolization (II) Trans venous Embolization (II)Surgical Intervention (III)Radiosurgical Intervention
  • 27.
    Summary – CAROTID CAVERNOUSFISTULA occurs in just 0.2% of patients with cranio-cerebral trauma – Commonly seen in young male patients – Bilateral involvement is seen in 1% – 2% of patients with post traumatic fistulas. - Life threatening sequelae (Intracranial hemorrhage, SAH etc) if not diagnosed and treated in time.
  • 28.
    • A patienthaving CAROTID CAVERNOUS FISTULA may rarely present to an OPHTHALMOLOGIST. • Because the symptoms and signs of a Carotid Cavernous Fistula often are mild in the initial stages (specially with Indirect/Dural fistulas), this lesion is difficult to diagnose and is often misdiagnosed as chronic conjunctivitis, blepharoconjunctivitis or POAG • Therefore a high index of suspicion is required for the correct diagnosis and management CONCLUSION
  • 29.
    Our case wasRarest of rare  Complete resolution of Intractable glaucoma, proptosis and congestion occurred after correct treatment Life threatening complications could be avoided Why have we presented this case ?
  • 30.
    REFERENCES 1. Jason A, Hannah G, Sande P, Philip M. Carotid-cavernous fistulas. Neurosurg Focus. 32 (5):E9, 2012, 314-23. 2. Borba LAB, Al-Mefty O: Normal anatomy of the cavernous sinus, in Eisenberg MB, Al-Mefty O (eds): The Cavernous Sinus: A Comprehensive Text. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000, pg 21–34. 3. Pedersen RA, Troost BT, Schramm VL: Carotid-cavernous sinus fistula after external ethmoid-sphenoid surgery. Clinical course and management. Arch Otolaryngol 107:307–309,1981. 4. Isamat F, Twose J, Conesa G: Surgical management of cavernous- carotid fistulas, in Eisenberg MB, Al-Mefty O (eds): The Cavernous Sinus: a Comprehensive Text. Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000, pp 201–208. 5. Hirai T, Korogi Y, Goto K, Ogata N, Sakamoto Y, Takahashi M: Carotid- cavernous sinus fistula and aneurysmal rupture associated with
  • 31.
    REFERENCES 6. De KeizerR: Carotid-cavernous and orbital arteriovenous fistulas: ocular features, diagnostic and hemodynamic considerations in relation to visual impairment and morbidity. Orbit; 22:121–142, 2003. 7. Lewis AI, Tomsick TA, Tew JM Jr: Management of 100 consecutive direct carotid-cavernous fistulas: results of treatment with detachable balloons. Neurosurgery; 36:239–245, 1995. 8. Schroth G, Lovblad O, Ozdoba C, Remonda L. Non-traumatic neurological emergencies: emergency neuroradiological interventions. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1648–1662. 9. Uchino A, Hasuo K, Matsumoto S, Masuda K. MRI of dural carotid- cavernous fistulas. Comparisons with postcontrast CT. Clin Imaging. Oct-Dec 1992;16(4):263-8. 10. Elster AD, Chen MY, Richardson DN, Yeatts PR. Dilated intercavernous sinuses: an MR sign of carotid-cavernous and carotid-dural fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Jul-Aug 1991;12(4):641-5.
  • 32.
  • 33.
    CAROTID CAVERNOUS FISTULApatient may present with raised intraocular pressure and the etiology may remained undiagnosed unless thorough evaluation is done

Editor's Notes

  • #6 Cardovascular , respiratory, abdominal and neurological examination
  • #9 Iop on presentation was ---- Patient did not follow up for a month but continued to use timolol eye drop in the right eye
  • #10 But he didnot follow up and consulted multiple ophthalmologists who gave him similar anti-glaucoma medication . He finally followed up after 2 month with increase in signs and symptoms
  • #11 Inspite of being on 2 drops in the right eye patients iop had raised to 34.5 mm of hg …Left eye also showed a rise in intraocular pressure of 24.4 mm of hg
  • #15 Colour Doppler was done and it showed
  • #16 MRI brain and orbit (contrast study )with MRA was done and it showed
  • #21 This is the anatomical classification CCF can be further classified according to the vessels involved .
  • #23 Type A is a direct / high volume fistula Type B,C,D are indirect / low volume fistula
  • #25 Some of these manisfestations are seen in extreme cases of CCF specially Direct / High volume fistula
  • #26 Other factors which may lead to raised iop are
  • #27 Basic principal of treatment is to Three modalities to achive this goal are Endovascular interventional is is the most widely used technique
  • #28 Our case was Complete resolution of glaucoma was seen after correct treatment